Forum

One of the less understood NC provisional ballots categories is "No Record of Registration" (NROR). This is when a prospective voter presents but the pollworker can't find the voter in the pollbook. This is usually because the voter is in fact NOT registered, and you can't register on election day. Of the 34,782 2026 provisionals, 46% are NROR. Of the 26,022 2022 provisionals, 50% were NROR, but 1,120 (9%) WERE counted, usually because the pollworker could not find the voter in the pollbook, but the name was actually there, OR there may have been an error in processing a timely registration OR still in a queue from DMV. See image below for party and race stats on 2026 and 2022 NROR. In 2022, a plurality were registered Republican, in 2026 they were more than 2 to 1 Democratic. An interesting factoid, for any NROR not counted, the provisional form is also a voter registration, so the person will be registered for future elections. If 9% of the 16,021 NROR for 2026 are counted, the remaining 14,000+ not counted will become registered voters! #ncpol

— Gerry Cohen (@gercohen) November 7, 2026

In 2022, a plurality were registered Republican, in 2026 they were more than 2 to 1 Democratic

This wasn’t a normal midterm. This is 2020 on steroids https://t.co/oLE3jpRVLS

— Vitruvius Republic 🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) November 7, 2026

I’ve lived in Texas for 45 years. No one outside of Austin knew who the hell Gina Hinojosa was. And you’re telling me she beat a multi-term incumbent, who won his last election by double digits, by a big margin in Texas. That math ain’t mathing

— Jim Verdi (@jjverdi) November 7, 2026

Texas midterms statewide races, in a figure https://t.co/SqQdWiCg0f

— Kevin Bass (@kevinnbass) November 8, 2026

I still don't know how everyone isn't talking about this 36+ point swing towards Democrats in PROVO. https://t.co/ILc8jtIzNy

— Dylan McDonnell (@DylanCMcDonnell) November 8, 2026

There are so many ways to program the machines to cheat. Rejecting ballots is one of them.

— Lara Logan (@laralogan) November 8, 2026

Speaking as a computer scientist... Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely. This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4. At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials. Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.

— Insomnus (@nighttimemedia) November 7, 2026

Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.

This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.

At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.

Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.

There are six congressional districts where turnout (votes counted so far) is at 90%+ of 2024 levels: 1. #TX29 (Houston) 2. #MN05 (Minneapolis) 3. #TX37 (Austin) 4. #TX30 (Dallas) 5. #TX18 (Houston) 6. #TX33 (Dallas)

— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) November 8, 2026

🚨🚨🚨🚨Update on this situation here in MaRICOpa County regarding the overvotes that were all adjudicated against Andy Biggs and Republicans and for the Democrats. My source who was adjudicating ballots showed me this breakdown - look at how many ballots sent to adjudication were due to overvotes - over 50%. I smell a rat.

— Rachel Alexander (@Rach_IC) November 7, 2026

My cousin in Maine worked the polls on Tuesday for 15 hours, and she was there when the mail-in ballots for our overseas active-duty military came in. Nope, there's no way in hell that our present military under our @SecWar, @PeteHegseth, voted 90% Dumocrat! If this happened in one state, y'all know good and damned well it happened in every other Democrat controlled state!

— Gypsy Hamilton (@GypsyHamilton) November 7, 2026

Someone misplaced a bag of ballots in Johnson County. I don't know if I trust Johnson County with a bag of unattended ballots. https://t.co/xnTd5WIBQF

— Real "MAGA Extremist" Housewives of Iowa (@fairfield_iowa) November 7, 2026

In MN! Check out the numbers from my precinct I worked during Election Day from start to finish. I talked to others that worked different precincts and was told Republicans won big time! I took pictures of the end results tape from the machine tabulator, so I have proof. This is the precinct I was head election judge for; Westonka Precinct - 1A (Minnetrista MN): MN Governor - Lisa Demuth 553 Amy Klobuchar 316 Difference = 237 US Senator for MN - Michelle Tafoya 553 Peggy Flanagan 301 Difference = 252 MN Secretary of State - Tad Jude 545 Steve Simon 293 Difference = 252 MN Attorney General - Ron Schutz 570 Keith Ellison 289 Difference = 281 MN County Attorney (Hennepin) - Anders Folk 406 Cedrick Frazier 147 Difference = 259 MN County Sheriff (Hennepin) - Joseph Bands 337 Dawanna Witt 240 Difference = 87 MN State Auditor - Scott Jensen 548 Zack Filipovich 292 Difference = 256 US Representative District 3 - Tyler Bass 531 Kelly Morrison 341 Difference = 190 State Senator District 45 - Shannon Bruce 548 Anne Johnson Stewart 320 Difference = 228 State Representative District 45A - Andrew Myers 572 Tracey Breazeale 298 Difference = 274 Three Rivers Park Commissioner District 1 - Marge Beard 357 Declan McCrory 171 Difference = 186

— Revive Minnesota (@revive_mn) November 7, 2026

This is the precinct I was head election judge for; Westonka Precinct - 1A (Minnetrista MN):

MN Governor -
Lisa Demuth 553
Amy Klobuchar 316
Difference = 237

US Senator for MN -
Michelle Tafoya 553
Peggy Flanagan 301
Difference = 252

MN Secretary of State -
Tad Jude 545
Steve Simon 293
Difference = 252

MN Attorney General -
Ron Schutz 570
Keith Ellison 289
Difference = 281

MN County Attorney (Hennepin) -
Anders Folk 406
Cedrick Frazier 147
Difference = 259

MN County Sheriff (Hennepin) -
Joseph Bands 337
Dawanna Witt 240
Difference = 87

MN State Auditor -
Scott Jensen 548
Zack Filipovich 292
Difference = 256

US Representative District 3 -
Tyler Bass 531
Kelly Morrison 341
Difference = 190

State Senator District 45 -
Shannon Bruce 548
Anne Johnson Stewart 320
Difference = 228

State Representative District 45A -
Andrew Myers 572
Tracey Breazeale 298
Difference = 274

Three Rivers Park Commissioner District 1 -
Marge Beard 357
Declan McCrory 171
Difference = 186

HIGH PRIORITY NEWS ALERT: Peltolagate expands to Pinkinsgate in the Mississippi senate race as evidence of Democrat election fraud across the United States in the 2026 midterm elections emerges. In the short term, the only solution is for Republicans to block certification of midterm elections results where there is strong evidence of Democrat corruption and illegal and unethical election interference. In the state of Mississippi senate race, evidence has been uncovered that shows deep state, long time Democrat Tyrone "Ty" Pinkins engaged in potentially illegal election fraud, election interference and collusion with the Democratic Party to help Democrat senate candidate Scott Colom defeat popular incumbent Republican Senator Cindy-Hyde Smith. After filing multiple campaign documents with the FEC as a Democrat, Tyrone Pinkins changed his party affiliation to Independent With 96.9% of the vote counted, the current results of the Mississippi senate race are: Democrat Scott Colom 467,930 49.1% Republican Cindy Hyde-Smith 465,356 48.8% "Independent" Tyrone Pinkins 20,028 2.1% Pinkins has run as Democrat in multiple prior campaigns in Mississippi. Pinkins now admits he placed himself on the Mississippi genderal election ballot as an Independent for the sole purpose of heisting Republican votes to defeat incumbent Republican Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith. Pinkins included a fraudulent statement in his campaign biography: "I am Ty Pinkins, and I'm an Independent candidate for the United States Senate. I am a proud son of the Mississippi Delta, born and raised in Rolling Fork, where I grew up in a working-class family and learned the values of faith, hard work, service, and perseverance." Pinkins has never been an Independent candidate in Mississippi. In fact, he contributed an enormous number of contributions to Barack Obama's campaign. Over the last few years, Pinkins has raked in tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from Act Blue, foreign-owned Democrat campaign operation NGP VAN, the Democrat Collective PAC and major Democrat donors from across the country including Jennifer Allan Soros, Loretta Lynch and Joseph Kaempfer. Pinkins campaigns have also paid Act Blue tens of thousans of dollars. During his 2026 campaign, Pinkins has received multiple warning letters from the FEC over irregularities in his campaign financial disclosures. Pinkins told WTVA News that he knew there was no chance of winning the election. Some argue that the race between Hyde-Smith and Colom would not be razor-thin had he dropped out of the race. However, Pinkins remained in. In an interview on the day after the election, Pinkins said the beautiful thing about a democracy is that voters have freedom of speech to vote for whomever they want. Pinkins said a poll showed that if he ran, 70% of his voters would be disgruntled Republican supporters. Which is ridiculous considering his far-left extremist positions to grant mass amnesty to illegal aliens, his pro-LGBT and pro-abortion agenda, his gun control and expanding the Supreme Court ideology, his anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian propaganda and his previous support for Barack Obama. Pinkins said his goal all along was to defeat the incumbent Sen. Hyde-Smith. He said he purposely did not campaign in majority Black areas. “Here is what needs to be shared. The portion of the vote that I drew – and people were concerned about splitting the Black vote – what I actually did was split the Republican vote,” Pinkins said. “Most of my votes came from Harrison County, DeSoto County, Rankin County, Jackson County, Hancock County, Madison County, Jones County, Pearl River County, Lamar County. All those counties have 13 percent Black population. Sixteen percent Black population. Ten percent Black population because I did not go to the Mississippi Delta. While Scott Colom was going all over this state.” I have unearthed even more disturbing intel on Pinkins which I will be reporting on shortly.

— Saint James Hartline (@JamesHartline) November 7, 2026

Breaking news from Galveston county in Texas! #breakingnews #news #foxnews #galvestontx #houstontx https://t.co/RntF6vpvnk

— Nick’s Right Podcast (@nicksrightpod) November 7, 2026

🚨🚨CD1 - RECOUNT Things that make you go hmmm……🤔 “Hey Pam - we had 50 missing ballots on our summary sheet that might be of interest in Brad Finstad’s recount”⬇️ An Election worker in my district sent me this photo and text message. I called to clarify. They said the ballots delivered in the morning had this summary sheet stating 800 ballots were delivered. However, when filling out this summary at the end of the night…..they realized they only had 750 ballots. They changed the number on the summary sheet (as shown in picture) to 750 and wrote this on the Election Incident Log reporting the 50 ballot discrepancy to Goodhue County. @BradFinstad @RepFinstad

— Rep. Pam Altendorf (@PamAltendorf) November 7, 2026

Striking voting patterns: Texas Republicans cast more votes for the Appeals Court seat than the US Senate. And in Georgia, Republicans cast more votes for the Ag Commissioner than the US Senate seat. Same pattern in Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina and Arizona. BUT in Nevada you see what is expected, and they did not have a US Senate race this year. Special thanks to Jeff O'Donnell for finding these patterns. Help him out at his give send go link at his X account @FSociety_1942

— Peter Bernegger (@PeterBernegger) November 7, 2026

I'm not guessing about whether our voter rolls are automated. In New Mexico, the data shows repeating ratios where we see exactly how many Democrats register on a given day. And they ALWAYS outpace Republicans in lockstep. Decline-to-state voters track just behind Democrats. This is a controlled algorithm. The image with multiple graphs demonstrates how the rolls are inflated in lockstep in all counties on the same date and time, adjusted for population. When the pollster class presents data, but never considers how that data has been manipulated, any conclusion they offer is typically vomit worthy.

— David Clements (@theprofsrecord) November 7, 2026

Someone asked me about Pennsylvania. The Republican governor candidate (Garrity) received 233,407 less votes than the total of all Republican House candidates. The Democrat governor (Shapiro) received 209,114 MORE votes than all of the Democrat house candidates. And... heavily gerrymandered district 3 didn't run a Republican candidate (again), leaving over 43,000 registered Republicans in that district with no Republican to vote for (there were 17,361 3rd party votes). Even so, 233,407 more Republican House candidate votes than the Republican Governor.

— The Lone Raccoon (@FSociety_1942) November 6, 2026

ELECTION INTEGRITY: Mississippi used Experian to determine voting eligibility. It determined that thousands of people were registered illegally and removed them from the rolls. Voters who were removed would still vote by affidavit, resulting in a massive surge in affidavit ballots.

— @amuse (@amuse) November 7, 2026

I’ve compiled the full list of ‘New valid voter registrations’ done nationwide between 2022-2024 WITHOUT PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP and the total number is 20,283,937 🚨 So 20,283,937 new voters were registered without citizenship checks and Democrats won the Midterms with roughly 20 million extra votes Here is a breakdown are 37 states that do not require citizenship verification to complete new voter registration and how many new registrations they registered without citizenship checks California: 4,308,269
Texas: 2,900,357
North Carolina: 1,410,905
Florida: 1,337,303
Illinois: 981,482
Pennsylvania: 842,187
New York: 680,259
Alabama: 572,632
Virginia: 563,781
Maryland: 524,189
Wisconsin: 524,103
Colorado: 498,308
Washington: 473,192
Massachusetts: 465,616
Missouri: 460,197
New Jersey: 425,782
Oklahoma: 388,669
Connecticut: 386,014
Louisiana: 263,705
Arkansas: 246,974
Oregon: 240,611
Kentucky: 220,093
Kansas: 218,739
Idaho: 181,741
Nebraska: 164,491
Nevada: 145,494
New Mexico: 118,141
Iowa: 116,644
Maine: 106,978
Vermont: 81,993
Montana: 78,669
Delaware: 71,902
Hawaii: 64,468
New Hampshire: 61,210
West Virginia: 53,343
Rhode Island: 53,040
Alaska: 52,456 States: 37
 Total: 20,283,937 This data comes from the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report buried on page 192 and 193 of the document — Ohh and if you redo this list to include new voter registrations that were done without proof of ID being required it’s even worse 43 states do not require you to show or attach an ID or any other eligibility documents to complete a standard new standard voter registration form During 2022-2024, there were 24,662,998 new valid registrations across 43 states that were done without any ID

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) November 7, 2026

I’ve compiled the full list of ‘New valid voter registrations’ done nationwide between 2022-2024 WITHOUT PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP and the total number is 20,283,937

🚨 So 20,283,937 new voters were registered without citizenship checks and Democrats won the Midterms with roughly 20 million extra votes

Here is a breakdown are 37 states that do not require citizenship verification to complete new voter registration and how many new registrations they registered without citizenship checks

California: 4,308,269
Texas: 2,900,357
North Carolina: 1,410,905
Florida: 1,337,303
Illinois: 981,482
Pennsylvania: 842,187
New York: 680,259
Alabama: 572,632
Virginia: 563,781
Maryland: 524,189
Wisconsin: 524,103
Colorado: 498,308
Washington: 473,192
Massachusetts: 465,616
Missouri: 460,197
New Jersey: 425,782
Oklahoma: 388,669
Connecticut: 386,014
Louisiana: 263,705
Arkansas: 246,974
Oregon: 240,611
Kentucky: 220,093
Kansas: 218,739
Idaho: 181,741
Nebraska: 164,491
Nevada: 145,494
New Mexico: 118,141
Iowa: 116,644
Maine: 106,978
Vermont: 81,993
Montana: 78,669
Delaware: 71,902
Hawaii: 64,468
New Hampshire: 61,210
West Virginia: 53,343
Rhode Island: 53,040
Alaska: 52,456
States: 37

Total: 20,283,937

This data comes from the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report buried on page 192 and 193 of the document

—

Ohh and if you redo this list to include new voter registrations that were done without proof of ID being required it’s even worse

43 states do not require you to show or attach an ID or any other eligibility documents to complete a standard new standard voter registration form

During 2022-2024, there were 24,662,998 new valid registrations across 43 states that were done without any ID