ADMIN

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • The judiciary is getting more and more out of hand. They are making a banana republic out of our country. Time for President Trump to assume full authority over the judiciary and clean up this mess. 

    • That's because, just like children, they will get away with what they can get away from, when not busted for bad behavior. The black-robed fools saw Roberts get away with (1). altering 0care's submission, tax to insurance.. (2) They saw Roberts and ? add trannie protection to existing Title VII Civil Rights legislation. Not one word was in Title VII that allowed violations of marriage definitions or indefinable sexual identities that no one can prove. So, the court decision was made based on nothing—to equate 'sex' with 'gender,' at that point, which is again, a constitutional AND moral ssue, not a court issue.

      If sex equated truly with gender, the entire govco would not have needed to reprint every single federal application for anything and revise all web pages. At OUR COST.

      And it—GENDER, violates ALL forms of Natural Law, violates biology, chemistry, what is known about the two brain hemispheres, which differ according to biological sex. Maturity age differs. Violates Anatomy and Physiology. Plus. Moral. Family. Faith. Education. Advertising. And God. 
      What does HE say? He calls it abominable. HE SAID, be fruitful and multiply. Good luck with that.

      Roberts—not a **** thing was done either time. And how did homosexual marriage become lawful? It was never in Congress, it was the judiciary. From the ones who cannot yet define Life or Woman or Legal or Immigrant or Marriage or Sex. Or abortion. Obergefell, which supposedly legalized homo marriage, was never heard in Congress. 

      And how does any sane person equate borders with LIFE? Try THAT in high school biology. Logic? The eyes begin formation in the 4th-5th week.

      Redefining Marriage—is a moral AND cultural question, as it destroys the very foundational structure of society, which are the family and the church. The court never 'went there.' It was an act of rebellion equal to the violations of Sodom. The court effectively decided that children do not need a Mother and a Father. Ask any child in an orphanage about how that works out. Or a child who had parents but lost one or both in a war. Ask. Or a child whose parent/s were killed in other violence. 

      Any group of people, black robed or not, who cannot identity the very thing that has allowed civilizations over millenia to flourish, and animals to flourish, is a group of people who are so unreal they cannot even define what it means to be human, it is unfathomable. 

      They pulled a fascist coup on us that altered our entire civilization in America. If this were flipped some way into a military parallel, it would mean defeat. Just like it has accomplished, the bricks of a civil, formerly moral society, are being pulled out, brick by brick. Just like the communists planned in The Communist Manifesto. (and the UN in its U.N. Child Rights Treaty.

      The Communist Manifesto abolishes the family in totality. Even Israel, some time ago, experimented raising children outside of the family unit, in kibbutz situations. The result was that those children could not form emotional bonds. They were insecure and were reduced in intimacy as adults. Nothing later made up for that loss of original and continuing M and F family structure. And here in the US, LBJ did his wicked deed in "Aid to Dependant Families," which broke up the Black family. He bribed the Mother with more financial aid if she had no Father in the home. He knew exactly what he was doing and said so. He was FOUL. His plan WAS to break up the Black family and to impoverish them in both ways, financial and emotional. A curse upon their lives.

    • What about the ball room? 

    • I addressed Roque judges, Ilona. Also part of the topic. 

    • Ilona, what does the ballroom have to do with this? 

    • The title of the story is a judge blocked the building of the ball room...that's what it has to do with the ball room. The conversation is off topic! 

    • Rogue judges are very much part of this conversation. The judge who gets involved in the ballroom is one of them. He should dismiss the case and let President Trump do what he wants to do, which is work on behalf of we the people. And again, this kind of rogue judge is exactly the reason why it is high time that President Trump assumes full authority over the judiciary and cleans up the mess. Of course, I'm happy to listen to other suggestions, if you want to share them. 

  • Ignore the rat. Set a trap. File charges for Judicial Misconduct. They are BOUND to "Under" and BOUND to "Good Behavior." Words matter.

This reply was deleted.