When the SCOTUS could no longer construct a logical and moral analysis, definition or contrast between what is "gender" and what is "sex," they ex-post facto, in 2020; altered 1964 Civil Rights legislation, to include trans as a protected class. Even Gorsuch could not separate "sex" from "gender.' It wasn't just Roberts. So lets put the blame where it deserves to be hurled: Squarely at SCOTUS. NO one in their right mind thinks a man is a woman. Period.
Replies
When the SCOTUS could no longer construct a logical and moral analysis, definition or contrast between what is "gender" and what is "sex," they ex-post facto, in 2020; altered 1964 Civil Rights legislation, to include trans as a protected class. Even Gorsuch could not separate "sex" from "gender.' It wasn't just Roberts. So lets put the blame where it deserves to be hurled: Squarely at SCOTUS. NO one in their right mind thinks a man is a woman. Period.