🚨 🇺🇸 ACTIVIST JUDGE WHO BLOCKED TRUMP'S SPENDING FREEZE HAS HIDDEN MONEY TIES
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) February 17, 2025
Federal Judge John McConnell failed to disclose his role at Crossroads Rhode Island while ruling against Trump's spending freeze.
His non-profit received $128M in government funding during his… https://t.co/JG3H6bicc0 pic.twitter.com/SKlSz3nICs
Federal Judge John McConnell failed to disclose his role at Crossroads Rhode Island while ruling against Trump's spending freeze. His non-profit received $128M in government funding during his 18-year board tenure, including $42M from 2020-2023. Rhode Island, a plaintiff in the case, already sent his organization $2.9M in 2025. The judge ordered federal funds to keep flowing to states—and coincidentally, to his own non-profit. Federal law requires judges to recuse themselves when their impartiality might be questioned. Wonder why he didn't.
READ ⬇️








Prior to serving as Chair, he was the Vice Chair in 2009 and 2010 and a board member from 2006 to 2008.




That accounted for over half of its $30 million of revenue.


Crossroads received over $42 million from 2020 to 2023 from government sources, including the state of Rhode Island, a named plaintiff in the lawsuit.





Here, Judge McConnell ordered taxpayer dollars to continue flowing to the states, including Rhode Island, writing, “[s]tates rely on federal funds to provide and maintain vital programs.”

In FY2023 alone, the organization’s audit shows that more than $10 million in federal funding flowed through Rhode Island to Crossroads.




When Judge McConnell ruled against the Trump Administration and required federal taxpayers to continue funding the State of Rhode Island, it seems that he also required continued funding for his pet “non-profit,” Crossroads Rhode Island.



The Judicial Conference of the United States imposes the same rules in the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges.


Both the appearance and reality of impartial justice are necessary to the public legitimacy of judicial pronouncements and thus to the rule of law itself.”

In that time, that NGO has received over $128 million dollars in government funding from the state, a recipient of federal taxpayer dollars.
This NGO, to which he owes a fiduciary duty, stood to lose millions of dollars based on the outcome of his decision in the case.Â
He did not do these things.
Now, it appears he should immediately vacate his TRO and swiftly recuse himself from this case without delay to comply with his ethical obligations.Â
• • •
Replies
We need to crack down on all these activist judges, they need to understand they are there to carry out the laws.......not make them!Â