🔴 When you report on Islam, the warnings start almost immediately:
— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) April 13, 2025
“Be careful.”
“Watch your back.”
“Get protection.”
These warnings aren’t coming from online trolls. They’re coming from law enforcement officers, intelligence experts, and national security veterans—people…
When you report on Islam, the warnings start almost immediately:
“Be careful.”
“Watch your back.”
“Get protection.”These warnings aren’t coming from online trolls. They’re coming from law enforcement officers, intelligence experts, and national security veterans—people who know exactly what happens when you pull back the curtain on Islam’s political agenda.
I can name countless friends in Europe who now live under 24-hour armed protection, bouncing between undisclosed safe houses. Others were murdered—for writing, drawing, teaching, or simply refusing to lie.
And when violence fails, the next weapon is lawfare—lawsuits meant to bankrupt, silence, and intimidate critics using our own legal system as a bludgeon.
So here’s the question no one in the mainstream media will dare ask:
If Islam is really “peaceful,” why does exposing it require armed guards, safe houses, bulletproof vests—and a legal defense team?
Just look at the names. Read their stories.
They weren’t the threat.
They held up a mirror to it.
And that’s what made them dangerous—to those who needed the truth buried.These are just a few of the hunted.
🟥 Charlie Hebdo staff (France)– massacred in their Paris office for drawing Muhammad.
🟥 Samuel Paty (France) – beheaded for showing those cartoons in a classroom lesson on free speech.
🟥 Salman Rushdie – stabbed on stage in NY, nearly blinded, decades after Iran’s fatwa over The Satanic Verses.
🟥 Theo van Gogh (Netherlands)– murdered for directing a film about Islam’s abuse of women.
🟥Ayaan Hirsi Ali – fled the Netherlands, now lives under protection in the U.S.
🟥 Lars Vilks (Sweden) – killed in a car crash while under 24/7 police escort after years of death threats.
🟥 Geert Wilders (Netherlands) – lives under constant armed protection for opposing Islamic immigration.
🟥 Pamela Geller (USA)– targeted in a beheading plot by ISIS supporters in the U.S.
🟥 Bosch Fawstin (USA) – continually threatened for drawing Muhammad and winning the Garland cartoon contest.
🟥 Rasmus Paludan (Denmark) – lives in safe houses, under armed guard for burning Qur’ans and warning about Islamization.
🟥 Robert Spencer (USA) – poisoned in Iceland, caught on video after criticizing Islam publicly.
🟥 Masih Alinejad (USA)– targeted in Iranian plots to kidnap or assassinate her for leading the anti-hijab movement.
🟥 Vipul Amrutlal Shah – faced threats and bans for producing The Kerala Story, which exposed ISIS recruitment and Love Jihad in India.
🟥 Nupur Sharma (India)– received global death threats for quoting Hadiths about Aisha.
🟥 Mila (France) – under permanent police protection since age 16 for criticizing Islam on Instagram.
🟥 Laurence Marchand-Taillade – under 24/7 police protection for exposing Muslim Brotherhood networks in France.
🟥 Éric Zemmour (France) – follows armed bodyguards daily, relentlessly targeted for criticizing Islam and immigration.
🟥 Michel Houellebecq (France)– under gendarmerie protection for writing Submission.
🟥 Robert Redeker (France) – forced into hiding, his life shattered after one article in Le Figaro.
🟥 Mohammed Sifaoui (France) – branded a murtad, under police protection for infiltrating Islamist cells.
🟥 Frédéric Haziza, Philippe Val, Zineb El Rhazoui, Imam Hassen Chalghoumi – all under heavy protection in France for defending secularism and exposing Islamic extremism.
🟥 Father Jacques Hamel (France)– slaughtered at the altar by ISIS terrorists during Mass in Normandy.
🟥 Avijit Roy – butchered in the street in Bangladesh for writing a secular blog.
🟥 Saman Abbas – murdered by her family in Italy for embracing Western life.
🟥 Mahsa Amini – beaten to death in Iran for wearing her hijab “incorrectly.”
🟥 Ahmad Abu Marhia – beheaded in the West Bank for being gay.
🟥 Sarah Halimi, Lola, Luna – victims of Islamist rage and brutal violence in France.
🟥 Salwan Momika – killed in Sweden after burning the Qur’an—while awaiting trial for “blasphemy.”
🟥 Saïd Djabelkhir (Algeria) – sentenced to 3 years in prison for calling for Islamic reform.
🟥 Asif Mohiuddin (Bangladesh/Germany) – survived assassination, now in exile for secular activism.
🟥 Farag Foda (Egypt) – assassinated for advocating separation of mosque and state.
🟥 Fatima Naoot (Egypt) – imprisoned for criticizing Eid animal sacrifice.
🟥 Ahmad Al Shamri (Saudi Arabia) – sentenced to death for expressing atheism online.
🟥Mashal Khan (Pakistan) – lynched by a mob over false blasphemy claims.
🟥 Basuki Tjahaja Purnama “Ahok” (Indonesia) – imprisoned for “blasphemy” after quoting the Qur’an.
🟥 Asia Bibi (Pakistan) – spent 8 years on death row for false accusations, forced to flee the country.
🟥 Farkhunda Malikzada (Afghanistan) – beaten to death by a mob after false accusations of burning the Qur’an.
🟥 Hatun Tash (UK) – stabbed and targeted for death after publicly criticizing Islam at Speakers’ Corner. Lives under heightened security.
🟥 Tommy Robinson (UK) – constantly threatened and forced into hiding for exposing Islamic extremism and "grooming gangs."
🟥 Jyllands-Posten Staff (Denmark) – journalists and editors under threat after publishing Muhammad cartoons in 2005; continue to face security concerns.
🟥 Imran Firasat (Spain) – lost asylum status and faced arrest after producing anti-Islam films; targeted with death threats and legal action for his criticism of Islam.
🟥 Kurt Westergaard (Denmark) – The Danish cartoonist who drew the controversial Muhammad cartoon in 2005. He survived an assassination attempt in 2010 and lived under police protection until his death in 2021.
🔻 The Verdict
Not one of these individuals committed violence.
Their only “crime” was using their voice—through words, art, protest, or belief.
They questioned. They criticized. They told the truth as they saw it.
And for that, they were harassed, sued, hunted, stabbed, exiled, poisoned, and killed.
If Islam is truly “peaceful,” why does exposing it come at the cost of one’s safety, freedom, or life?
Why are so many forced to live behind security gates, rotate through safe houses, or rely on legal teams just to survive?
And these are only some of the names I’ve listed.
How many more have been silenced before they could speak?
How many are being intimidated into silence in their own communities?
How many live in fear—unseen, unheard—knowing that one wrong word could end everything?
Cost them their job? Their safety? Their future?This is no longer just about free speech.
It’s about civilizational survival.Because if we can no longer name the danger—
If we can no longer protect our own citizens from violence and intimidation,
If we allow fear to dictate truth, and submission to replace courage—
Then freedom is already gone.
Speech will die first.
But our countries will follow.The names on this list are not just victims.
They are warnings.And unless we force our political leaders to act now,
many more will follow.History has made that pattern painfully clear.
Replies
"This is no longer just about free speech.
It’s about civilizational survival."
I wish Americans would understand, realize what is going on globally with Islam, how governments advancing the Islamic takeover of the world! Twenty years ago when 9/11 was still fresh in America's heart, the Muslims were already invading us. Instead of warning Americans about the dangers of Islam and telling us this will not take root in America, all George Bush could say was "Islam is the religion of peace".
How peaceful are we since the towers, since mosques are going up all over this country, since entire areas are taken over by Muslims, since they got into our government, since we aren't supposed to say what Islam really is? How many Americans must die to protect those who chant "death to America"? Are we crazy?
This country supposed to be run by the people, how is it that the people have no say about who we want and don't want in this country. How does Islam in America serve the people......how are the politicians who bend knee to Islam serve us, WHAT ARE THEY GETTING OUT OF SERVING THE ENEMY?
AND the pope said, "We need to learn to be less fundamental.." He did NOT speak that only about islam, but about Chrisitanity itself.
This pope is not fit for his position. There should be a lot less politics in religion but the Vatican is much like DC!
I do have a question! Why do all American presidents visit the pope when they aren't catholic (outside of Kennedy and Biden) and neither is America.
In addition to all of the above, there is this:
The brutal beating and gang rape of Lara Logan in Egypt by muslim men.
The brutal beating and gang rape of a Dutch reporter, Nina Burleigh, who also had to be hospitalized, like Lara, for her injuries. Recent.
Criticism of this satanic cult of mohammed, sparks outrage no matter where, when or by whom. The cover of (Polish) @Tygodnik—Sieci ("Online") provocatively suggests muslim migrants grabbing a woman. Of course, it wasn't true and muslim men confirmed that by force. The article was titled, "The Islamic Rape of Europe." This cover is the exact PROOF of what the so-called European Union was MEANT to do——subdue the Christian white European populations. NOTE: NO ONE is telling muslims to subdue themselves, their men or their gangs or their fatwa's or their leaders. But leaders of Germany and other nations just told their women to stay home at night. Except the gang rapes noted above happened in broad daylight.
Facebook article; "2/3 of German women are afraid to take public transport after dark."
MidEast Forum: "Europe is turning into One Big No-Go Zone."
Ayan Hirsi has been speaking out for at least a decade about the islamic practice of "cutting"of girls, known as Female Genital Mutilation. Over a decade ago, I happened upon a 2 hr documentary about this topic. The women don't even tell their daughters what is going to happen to them. The mothers told their daughters they were going to a place in the country. They held each girl down, them screaming, while the woman paid to do the cutting had to be paid MORE in order to use clean knife or scissors. They, then bind the girls so they can't move until the bleeding lessons.
Institutions such as the Hoover Institution, Georgetown Institute for Women Peace and Security, and social entities such as Facebook,, are ALL screaming about the increase of islamic rage against women.
Islam's "fatwa" allowing what is 'called' thighing of an infant. Here is a description by one of their own.
https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235070573-sistanis-office-resp...
Allah Seeker
"Sounds like nonsense to me personally. What about consent which is a pillar of Islamic marriage? And some of them aren't even girls, but toddlers and babies.
So in other words they say you can sell your baby daughter to perverts, because there are men who bury their babies alive. That's human trafficking paradise fatwa to me!
I lost all respect for these scholars."
pisceswolf96
"Hello everyone. So I just got off the phone talking to Sistani's office about the Thighing fatwa.
Just so we are on the same track I asked a few days ago about Sistani's fatwa on thighing (more specifically why it was removed) and you can check it here
I began by asking why the Fatwa was removed in the newer editions on Minhaj Al-Saleheen and the response was that they are NOT sure and it is surely for the benefits of Shia as Sistani sees fit.
As for why it was allowed in the first place, they answered because in Islam the rule of (جلب المصالح ودرء المفاسد) bringing the good and warding off the bad is in play, since Arabs used to practise female infanticide because females were seen as very undesirable for many reasons including economical reasons. They continued to explain that it is then better to marry off those girls to men who can spend money on them as their wives instead of burying them alive but since disallowing coitus without allowing other sexual acts would discourage men from marrying those girls, thighing was allowed alongside other non-penetrative sexual acts. I mentioned the age difference or the fact that this might have a lasting psychological effect on the minor girl but that didn't change anything and the ruling still stands.
Any damage done to an infant via 'thighing' makes the infant the responsibility of the man for as long as the child lived.
That is what Sistani shb actually said : "There is no problem in it." and same goes for Ayatullah Khomeini (رضي الله عنه).
As i said many times....Islam was created by Satan, only something that evil could bring about something so distructive.
What is it going to take for people to KNOW that?