It is not the mother's body or her right to life that is being denied... It is the aborted infant's life and body that were denied the right to life. The woman's body is not being violated ... It is the child's body that is being murdered ... aborted.
Typical devildemocommiecrat, 2 faced!!!!! dementia is merely a bobblehead puppet with no cognitive thinking ability left doing the bidding of his puppet masters!!!!!!!!!! The Lake of Fire awaits ALL devildemocommiecrats and the fools that vote for them!!!!!!!!!!
Exactly... WHat part of its Unconstitutional don't they understand.... any so-called right is reserved for the people or the states under the 9th and 10th Amendments. It is time to pass a law that those running for office must pass a competency test on our Founding Documents... the Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, and Federalist Papers... no one should hold public office without having a firm knowledge regarding their duties and the powers of government... no one.
Skeptical > Ronald A. Nelson COL, USA, RetiredJune 29, 2022 at 3:30am
I would take a differant tack.
Office holders propose and support clearly unconstitutional measures because they are deemed immune from repercussions for doing so.
In serious issues only, that would constitute sedition, insurrection, and violation of due-process Constitutionality, I would remove the in-office immunity presumption or internal peer review of serving politicians, and subject the accused to Grand Jury investigation.
It takes an Amendment though. One more reason for a CoS?
My god man... there is no in-office immunity for members of Congress under the Constitution or statutory law... Constitutional Claims of such immunity are for misdemeanors and exist only while Congress is in session. The powers that be in government are not above the law... They are corrupting the law and have avoided prosecution unlawfully. We have a runaway government anyone that expects these individuals to propose and ratify an amendment that exposes them to prosecution and loss of power is mistaken. Are we to believe that the several States are above corruption and that they would hang themselves and their fellow officers? Wake up. No self-serving blue state is going to ratify an Amendment that puts their party and personal power in jeopardy.
Must we be reminded that it takes 2/3rds of Congress to PROPOSE an amendment and 3/4ths of the several States to ratify a proposed amendment before it can become Constitutional law? Even if we were able to invoke an Article 5 convention of states, any amendment proposed would have trouble getting 2/3rds of the Convention to approve it and 3/4ths of the States to ratify it. I would suggest that a COS is highly unlikely to occur. History demonstrates how difficult it is as none has ever been called in over 250yrs. America is more divided and polarized today than ever making political agreement more difficult than at any time in our history. Don't look for a COS to be called anytime soon.
Pipe dreams always end up in smoke... the COS is a pipe dream. In ten years it has managed to get 19 of the required 34 states to petition congress... it has failed to demand a COS based on the existing open petitions for a COS... more than enough to call one but nothing is happening nor likely to happen.
Skeptical > Ronald A. Nelson COL, USA, RetiredJuly 1, 2022 at 5:10pm
- A form of immunity from direct prosecution actually does exist, to prevent a break of serving continuity for certain office holders. Felonies only are addressed, and misdemeanors are completely ignored. This insulation can be suspended by a show of no confidence by current serving political peers in a process called Impeachment. An opportunity to adjust to avoid disruption of government function is then afforded, and a minimalizing of Justice being deferred is a second benefit. Otherwise we would be stuck with a government official and his bad actions, like say an influence peddling geriatric POTUS, until the term is up for election.
- With the exception of high population Blue states, I truly question the assumption that party control must remain in lockstep opposition to obviously benficial actions, like a CoS.
- It is precisely that this Nation has not seen such a stalemate in party block representation in the Federal government, that a CoS becomes so much more desirable.
Folks know change is mandated to occur, and is not simply a preferred option. If our government servants will not own the duty, then We must.
I am fearing for you Colonel, really. It seems the 2020 debacle has tinged you with a hard-bitten outlook. Do not dispair. This Nation is favored by Divine Providence.
I did not say that immunity was not being practiced... I stated that it was not lawful or conferred by a lawful process... No one is above the law and that includes Nancy Pelosi... However, when the law is in the sewer, it becomes nearly automatic that most of the privileged are granted DEFACTO immunity.... not by the process of the law, but by corrupt PRACTICE.
It should be obvious that immunity by an act of law is not available... as immunity only applies to Marxist operatives, as there certainly is no immunity for Trump The left has made it clear they want all of Trump's allies in jail. How then does immunity work under the law... it doesn't.
In practice, immunity generally applies to those who have the political and or personal power to avoid prosecution... Passing more laws will only result in more privileged avoidance of the law... fiat immunity. Immunity is not part of the lawful process it is a result of unlawful conduct by those who are charged with bringing justice to bear upon the lawless. Our legal system has become a two-tiered system... one for the common man and another for the privileged. There exists a de facto new age aristocracy, a cabal of wealthy and the connected that operate outside the law with impunity.
It is a Red Herring, mere political theater, to suggest new laws focused on political corruption will pass or be administered any differently than the existing laws against political corruption... We currently have law libraries full of such laws... Only, to have them remain shelved, hidden away in the dark recesses of a corrupt judiciary, and Department of Justice. Our corrupt government is not the product of a lawful process, it is the result of corrupt men and women who refuse to properly administer the law.
Replies
If ever the Court made a tragic error, it was their refusal to get involved in the STOLEN ELECTION OF 2020.
The evidence of voter fraud was compelling enough to halt the transfer of power until the issue was resolved.
That tragic error by The Supreme Court was the worst miscarriage of justice in American history.
Agree 100%
It is not the mother's body or her right to life that is being denied... It is the aborted infant's life and body that were denied the right to life. The woman's body is not being violated ... It is the child's body that is being murdered ... aborted.
Typical devildemocommiecrat, 2 faced!!!!! dementia is merely a bobblehead puppet with no cognitive thinking ability left doing the bidding of his puppet masters!!!!!!!!!! The Lake of Fire awaits ALL devildemocommiecrats and the fools that vote for them!!!!!!!!!!
It's unconstitutional.........PERIOD!
Exactly... WHat part of its Unconstitutional don't they understand.... any so-called right is reserved for the people or the states under the 9th and 10th Amendments. It is time to pass a law that those running for office must pass a competency test on our Founding Documents... the Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, and Federalist Papers... no one should hold public office without having a firm knowledge regarding their duties and the powers of government... no one.
I would take a differant tack.
Office holders propose and support clearly unconstitutional measures because they are deemed immune from repercussions for doing so.
In serious issues only, that would constitute sedition, insurrection, and violation of due-process Constitutionality, I would remove the in-office immunity presumption or internal peer review of serving politicians, and subject the accused to Grand Jury investigation.
It takes an Amendment though. One more reason for a CoS?
Boy, this ought to cause a stir.
My god man... there is no in-office immunity for members of Congress under the Constitution or statutory law... Constitutional Claims of such immunity are for misdemeanors and exist only while Congress is in session. The powers that be in government are not above the law... They are corrupting the law and have avoided prosecution unlawfully. We have a runaway government anyone that expects these individuals to propose and ratify an amendment that exposes them to prosecution and loss of power is mistaken. Are we to believe that the several States are above corruption and that they would hang themselves and their fellow officers? Wake up. No self-serving blue state is going to ratify an Amendment that puts their party and personal power in jeopardy.
Must we be reminded that it takes 2/3rds of Congress to PROPOSE an amendment and 3/4ths of the several States to ratify a proposed amendment before it can become Constitutional law? Even if we were able to invoke an Article 5 convention of states, any amendment proposed would have trouble getting 2/3rds of the Convention to approve it and 3/4ths of the States to ratify it. I would suggest that a COS is highly unlikely to occur. History demonstrates how difficult it is as none has ever been called in over 250yrs. America is more divided and polarized today than ever making political agreement more difficult than at any time in our history. Don't look for a COS to be called anytime soon.
Pipe dreams always end up in smoke... the COS is a pipe dream. In ten years it has managed to get 19 of the required 34 states to petition congress... it has failed to demand a COS based on the existing open petitions for a COS... more than enough to call one but nothing is happening nor likely to happen.
- A form of immunity from direct prosecution actually does exist, to prevent a break of serving continuity for certain office holders. Felonies only are addressed, and misdemeanors are completely ignored. This insulation can be suspended by a show of no confidence by current serving political peers in a process called Impeachment. An opportunity to adjust to avoid disruption of government function is then afforded, and a minimalizing of Justice being deferred is a second benefit. Otherwise we would be stuck with a government official and his bad actions, like say an influence peddling geriatric POTUS, until the term is up for election.
- With the exception of high population Blue states, I truly question the assumption that party control must remain in lockstep opposition to obviously benficial actions, like a CoS.
- It is precisely that this Nation has not seen such a stalemate in party block representation in the Federal government, that a CoS becomes so much more desirable.
Folks know change is mandated to occur, and is not simply a preferred option. If our government servants will not own the duty, then We must.
I am fearing for you Colonel, really. It seems the 2020 debacle has tinged you with a hard-bitten outlook. Do not dispair. This Nation is favored by Divine Providence.
Haven't you recently seen encouraging signs?
I did not say that immunity was not being practiced... I stated that it was not lawful or conferred by a lawful process... No one is above the law and that includes Nancy Pelosi... However, when the law is in the sewer, it becomes nearly automatic that most of the privileged are granted DEFACTO immunity.... not by the process of the law, but by corrupt PRACTICE.
It should be obvious that immunity by an act of law is not available... as immunity only applies to Marxist operatives, as there certainly is no immunity for Trump The left has made it clear they want all of Trump's allies in jail. How then does immunity work under the law... it doesn't.
In practice, immunity generally applies to those who have the political and or personal power to avoid prosecution... Passing more laws will only result in more privileged avoidance of the law... fiat immunity. Immunity is not part of the lawful process it is a result of unlawful conduct by those who are charged with bringing justice to bear upon the lawless. Our legal system has become a two-tiered system... one for the common man and another for the privileged. There exists a de facto new age aristocracy, a cabal of wealthy and the connected that operate outside the law with impunity.
It is a Red Herring, mere political theater, to suggest new laws focused on political corruption will pass or be administered any differently than the existing laws against political corruption... We currently have law libraries full of such laws... Only, to have them remain shelved, hidden away in the dark recesses of a corrupt judiciary, and Department of Justice. Our corrupt government is not the product of a lawful process, it is the result of corrupt men and women who refuse to properly administer the law.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 7 Next