Replies

  • I don't understand how they can check to see if signatures are phony on the mail in ballots unless they have the persons registration there to compare it with. Is this how they do it? If so, boy it would take a lot of time to check each and every one of them. Or do they do this only if the ballot looks hokey? 

    • well, well what's that tells you?

       

  • Is she asking to see if the recounters are prone to making the mistake? (what I hope and expect)

    Is she requesting the recounters to commit election recount fraud? (what we have come to suspect)

    So where are the police come to collect office holders committing documented criminal acts?

    Do you believe elections are held without organized wide scale fraud? 

     

    It is surprising how a military invasive attack and a medical lockdown attack have the same effects upon a victimized civil country, no?

    The Country must be still be free since no military has been used to occupy it, right?

    It seems the armed citizenry has had something to do with the choice of method, but just doesn't discourage the itchy globalist palm entirely.

     

    How are your civil liberties doing in what some would still call a "free society"?

    Have you:

    - been placed under house arrest at state direction, and told to remain unless authorized to leave?

    -been told to isolate in small family ghetto groups with a headcount limit, or face punishment?

    -been told your ability to run a business/earn a living is subject to state permission to what it deems essential ( a wartime term)

    -faced a threat of bankrupted business or house eviction due to economy-crippling state edicts?

    -been hampered constantly in buying necessities under regulation for access?

    -been restricted from worship at church, but see no restrictions on state-tolerated group activities?

    -been told you will have foreign substances placed into you, just as farmers do livestock?

    -seen news services self-censoring and labeling information as it conforms to state policy?

    -seen your ability to travel subject to permission by other than your determination?

    -had the right to keep and bear arms for self defence remain under relentless state effort to restrict or ban? (the state still manages time for this)

    -realized the state is quite comfortable with this arrangement, and will never release control, but rather intends increasing it at will while denying the intention? 

    -been offered minimal universalized entitlement state support for signing away your rights to own personal property, especially in the form of anonymous portable wealth?

    If so for most or all reasons, you are occupied, with the same ruthless intent as NAZI Germany showed with its undesirables.

    Of course, these oppressors will dare only go as far as the victims allow them to.

    All these radical changes have occured in a 10 month period. Is Joe Biden as a President, supposed to eliminate them, or enhance their effect?

    Some would say being mindful of these issues is not seemly at this time of observance.

    I am prompted to remember Christs reply to "unseemly" behaviour on the Sabbath:

    MARK 2:23 - 28

    23 One Sabbath he was going through the grainfields, and as they made their way, his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. 24 And the Pharisees were saying to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?” 25 And he said to them, “Have you never read what David did, when he was in need and was hungry, he and those who were with him: 26 how he entered the house of God, in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those who were with him?” 27 And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. 28 So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

    Merry Christmas! And a Country free of Tyranny!

  • THIS IS GETTING CRAZY AS THE DAY GOES BY

  • Same counters will do it again, like they did the first time!  Election fraud!!!!   New counters needed with cameras behind each one to validate everything they do!

    • If the police have to wear webcams so do they

    • But Shirley, interests that have carefully purposefully maintained this election fraud liablity in our process for d-e-c-a-d-e-s , and even enhanced it with computer tallying technology designed to reject 60% of ballots for adjudication (the manager gets to decide what the vote is), have no interest in imposing technology to document the intended fraud.

      So count on the idea being resisted. And remember who resists the accountabilty. That person is either compromised or dangerously dull-witted. A Jar Jar Binks!

      https://youtu.be/bPJy0HTRD4s

  • Fraud election!! Get it fixed. Where is the scotus!? 

    • scotus is part of the deep state, they won't help us

  • There is too much evidence to prove that the election was fraud so let us have a re-election this time legal and by the law.

This reply was deleted.