You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
-
This process has historical presedent... it has been used to deny the seating of contested elections and for individuals who did not meet constitutional standards for holding the office they claim
See:
See all on Wikipedia" alt="See more" width="16" height="16" data-bm="43" />
WikipediaUnseated members of the United States Congress - Wikipedia
McCormack (1969), limited the powers of the Congress to refuse to seat an elected member to when the individual does not meet the specific constitutional requirements of age, citizenship or residency. See more
Both houses of the United States Congress have refused to seat new members based on Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution which states that:
"Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns … See more -
Bump
This reply was deleted.
We are at WAR for our Republic...it is past time the GOP/RNC leadership demands loyalty and the full support of all its members.
Timing on this issue is important... Let the Speaker call for a special session of the House NOW... in order to Constitutionally challenge the many state elections where serious election irregularities exist.. Two such cases exist in Orange County, CA... others exist in several States where ballots were accepted and counted well past election day...
The House must deny the contested seats admittance until it determines the lawful count and certifies the winner(s). Other contested elections need similar Constitutional certification by the House and US Senate as the Constitutional Judge of their elections.
See Article 1, Section 5, Clause 1 of the US Constitution: Article I Section 5 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
"Article I, section 5, clause 1 of the Constitution gives to the branches of the Legislature power to “judge” or determine whether an election of one of its members is valid and whether the person elected meets the Constitutional requirements for service."
Congress's review and certification of its elections and findings ARE NOT SUBJECT to the Court's review... see link above.