Remember that large Danish study the media said proved there was no link between vaccines and autism?
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) August 28, 2025
They quietly issued a correction 👇 https://t.co/McnJDyAiuN
Big Pharma just accidentally proved that vaccines cause autism.
This is not a joke—it’s the biggest bombshell of the year.
The media called this new study of 1.4 million kids “definitive proof” of no link between vaccines and autism.
Then, the medical journal quietly issued a correction—and corrected data EXPOSED that autism and ADHD rates were over 200% higher than the study claimed at first.
The study’s authors—who work for a state-owned vaccine producer that makes $400M a year selling vaccines—manipulated the data and ignored unvaccinated kids to get the result they wanted.
Bookmark this thread.
We’re about to reveal one of the darkest secrets behind Pharma’s “safe and effective” lie:
🧵THREAD
This is not a joke—it’s the biggest bombshell of the year.
The media called this new study of 1.4 million kids “definitive proof” of no link between vaccines and autism.
Then, the medical journal quietly issued a correction—and corrected data EXPOSED that autism and ADHD rates were over 200% higher than the study claimed at first.
The study’s authors—who work for a state-owned vaccine producer that makes $400M a year selling vaccines—manipulated the data and ignored unvaccinated kids to get the result they wanted.
Bookmark this thread.
We’re about to reveal one of the darkest secrets behind Pharma’s “safe and effective” lie:
🧵THREAD
First, make sure to bookmark this thread above.
A new study from Denmark is being hailed in mainstream media as definitive proof that there is no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism.
But here’s what they won’t tell you:
The study was designed to HIDE any evidence of such a link.
It was full of inexplicable faults and decisions made to obscure the truth that other studies have revealed—that aluminum exposure via childhood vaccines is strongly linked to numerous chronic diseases.
Then, the raw data exposed the truth.
Let’s break this down:🧵
A new study from Denmark is being hailed in mainstream media as definitive proof that there is no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism.
But here’s what they won’t tell you:
The study was designed to HIDE any evidence of such a link.
It was full of inexplicable faults and decisions made to obscure the truth that other studies have revealed—that aluminum exposure via childhood vaccines is strongly linked to numerous chronic diseases.
Then, the raw data exposed the truth.
Let’s break this down:🧵
NBC News accused RFK Jr. of spreading “vaccine misinformation” for calling aluminum in vaccines “extremely neurotoxic.”
But it’s not just RFK Jr. saying this.
Decades of scientific research PROVE it:🧵
But it’s not just RFK Jr. saying this.
Decades of scientific research PROVE it:🧵
Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, and the “most abundant neurotoxic metal on Earth.”
Aluminum has no biological function or need. It is toxic to all life forms.
It is toxic to the brain, central nervous system, immune system, and gastrointestinal system.
Aluminum is found in elevated levels in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and autism.
A 2011 NIH study revealed that “since 1911, experimental evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that chronic [aluminum] intoxication reproduces neuropathological hallmarks of [Alzheimer’s].”
Full study:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21157018/
Aluminum has no biological function or need. It is toxic to all life forms.
It is toxic to the brain, central nervous system, immune system, and gastrointestinal system.
Aluminum is found in elevated levels in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and autism.
A 2011 NIH study revealed that “since 1911, experimental evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that chronic [aluminum] intoxication reproduces neuropathological hallmarks of [Alzheimer’s].”
Full study:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21157018/
A 2017 NIH study revealed that aluminum and other neurotoxic elements can easily overwhelm the human body.
The study even called for directives to require “vaccination programs to use only non-neurotoxic adjuvants, especially for young children and all women of child-bearing ages.”
Full study:Â pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29206191/
The study even called for directives to require “vaccination programs to use only non-neurotoxic adjuvants, especially for young children and all women of child-bearing ages.”
Full study:Â pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29206191/
The Metal Neurotoxins: An Important Role in Current Human Neural Epidemics? - PubMedMany published studies have illustrated that several of the present day neurological epidemics (autism, attention deficit disorder, Alzheimer's) cannot be correlated to any single neurotoxicant. Howev…https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29206191/
Still, Pharma and mainstream science concoct manipulated studies to defend their use of aluminum in vaccines.
The new Danish study was designed to HIDE any potential evidence of a link between aluminum and autism or other chronic diseases.
Here’s how:🧵Â
The new Danish study was designed to HIDE any potential evidence of a link between aluminum and autism or other chronic diseases.
Here’s how:🧵Â
First, the Danish study excluded kids who received an “implausible” number of vaccines—or more than are officially recommended.
But this “implausible” number of vaccines is the same amount that American kids receive.
Why is this a problem?
They excluded the kids who were MOST likely to reveal a link between aluminum and chronic diseases, because these kids had the greatest exposure.
Furthermore, they only followed children from 2 years old up to 5 years in their primary analysis—despite having access to nearly three decades of records.
But this “implausible” number of vaccines is the same amount that American kids receive.
Why is this a problem?
They excluded the kids who were MOST likely to reveal a link between aluminum and chronic diseases, because these kids had the greatest exposure.
Furthermore, they only followed children from 2 years old up to 5 years in their primary analysis—despite having access to nearly three decades of records.
Second, the authors excluded kids who showed symptoms of the very conditions they were looking for.
All kids with “preexisting conditions” before age 2, “including congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, and heart of liver failure,” were excluded.
Up to 466,047 kids were excluded from the source cohort of 1,384,357 kids because they had these symptoms before the age of 2.
All kids with “preexisting conditions” before age 2, “including congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, and heart of liver failure,” were excluded.
Up to 466,047 kids were excluded from the source cohort of 1,384,357 kids because they had these symptoms before the age of 2.
Third, the study made a decision that ERASED the very evidence they were looking for.
The authors adjusted for a list of confounding variables to isolate the impact of aluminum exposure.
Birth year and season, sex, maternal age at delivery, etc.
But then, they adjusted for the “number of visits to a general practitioner before age 2.”
If aluminum exposure from a vaccine resulted in a chronic disease, it’s very likely that the child would have had more visits to a general practitioner to address their symptoms.
Thus, the study excluded kids who may have showed clear signs of an injury from an aluminum-containing vaccine.
The authors adjusted for a list of confounding variables to isolate the impact of aluminum exposure.
Birth year and season, sex, maternal age at delivery, etc.
But then, they adjusted for the “number of visits to a general practitioner before age 2.”
If aluminum exposure from a vaccine resulted in a chronic disease, it’s very likely that the child would have had more visits to a general practitioner to address their symptoms.
Thus, the study excluded kids who may have showed clear signs of an injury from an aluminum-containing vaccine.
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. perfectly EXPOSED the insanity of adjusting for the number of doctor visits before age 2:
“Imagine studying the association between smoking and lung disease and adjusting for having nicotine-stained fingers, carrying a lighter, or frequency of coughing in the 24 months before lung cancer diagnosis.”
“What you are doing, in effect, is mathematically erasing the very signal you are supposed to be detecting.”
“Imagine studying the association between smoking and lung disease and adjusting for having nicotine-stained fingers, carrying a lighter, or frequency of coughing in the 24 months before lung cancer diagnosis.”
“What you are doing, in effect, is mathematically erasing the very signal you are supposed to be detecting.”
So, did the authors compare health outcomes of kids with no aluminum exposure to kids with aluminum exposure?
No.
They only looked for differences between kids who received vaccines with aluminum to kids who received vaccines with slightly less aluminum.
No.
They only looked for differences between kids who received vaccines with aluminum to kids who received vaccines with slightly less aluminum.
In fact, 15,237 kids in the study’s cohort received ZERO vaccines with aluminum before age 2.
This would have been a perfect independent control group.
But the authors mixed this group into a group with kids who received a low level of exposure to aluminum through vaccines.
This would have been a perfect independent control group.
But the authors mixed this group into a group with kids who received a low level of exposure to aluminum through vaccines.
The data plot below reveals the study’s flawed results.
Notice anything anomalous?
If the study found a link between aluminum exposure and chronic conditions, the black diamond and its head and tail would sit to the right of the vertical line.
But the results SHOCKINGLY reveal that aluminum exposure actually DECREASED the chance of many chronic conditions—an implausible finding that the authors of the study didn’t even try to explain.
Notice anything anomalous?
If the study found a link between aluminum exposure and chronic conditions, the black diamond and its head and tail would sit to the right of the vertical line.
But the results SHOCKINGLY reveal that aluminum exposure actually DECREASED the chance of many chronic conditions—an implausible finding that the authors of the study didn’t even try to explain.
The Statens Serum Institut, who employs the study’s authors, makes $200-$400 million a year selling vaccines.
Is it any wonder that they would also fund “science” to sweep vaccine injury under the rug?
Is it any wonder that they would also fund “science” to sweep vaccine injury under the rug?
🚨But there’s another BOMBSHELL.
A correction to the study was issued on July 17.
Revised data showed a “statistically significant” link between aluminum exposure from vaccines and autism and ADHD.
The study’s data literally proved the OPPOSITE of what the authors claimed:🧵Â
A correction to the study was issued on July 17.
Revised data showed a “statistically significant” link between aluminum exposure from vaccines and autism and ADHD.
The study’s data literally proved the OPPOSITE of what the authors claimed:🧵Â
Dr. Friedrich V. Pfister revealed that the revised data showed a substantial increase in the neurodevelopmental events like autism and ADHD “from approximately 2200 to over 5200.”
That’s not a minor correction—it’s over 200% higher than the original number.
“This revision fundamentally alters the statistical power and confidence intervals for key outcomes.”
That’s not a minor correction—it’s over 200% higher than the original number.
“This revision fundamentally alters the statistical power and confidence intervals for key outcomes.”
The revised data reveals “statistically significant associations” between aluminum exposure from vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes like autism and ADHD.
In other words, the data proved exactly the OPPOSITE of what the study claimed.
In other words, the data proved exactly the OPPOSITE of what the study claimed.
The media is SILENT about the revised data exposing the truth—after falsely declaring that the study “proved” no link between vaccines and autism.
Why?
Because they’re owned by the same dark forces that are poisoning our children.
Why?
Because they’re owned by the same dark forces that are poisoning our children.
Â
Replies