CDR Kerchner "I find it best to always stick with statements that have Constitutional authority behind them. For instance When someone states “He or she was born in the U.S. they are a natural born CITIZEN.” I go to the Supreme Court who has the Constitutional authority to say who is and who is not a natural born CITIZEN. Then post one or two of these quotes >>>
The Supreme Court standard birth circumstance that must be met to be a natural born CITIZEN. Here is what the Supreme Court Justices say
>>> Justice Gray “all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens”
>>> Chief Justice Fuller in the same case >> “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Justice Grier “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Chief Justice Waite “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens,”
>>> Justice Livingston “The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Chief Justice Fuller (in dissent) “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
Finally In Perkins v Elg Chief Justice Hughes called the defendant Ms Elg A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN then described her birth circumstances –Miss Elg was *****born in Brooklyn, New York, *****on October 2, 1907. Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to ***1906, and her father was naturalized here in that year.*** The law then was wives became U.S. Naturalized CITIZENS automatically when their husband’s were naturalized. <<< So Ms Elg ***was born in the U.S. of CITIZEN parents. I say the Supreme Court standard because that is the only way the Supreme Court has ever described the birth circumstances of a natural born CITIZEN.
NEVER EVER has the Supreme Court stated "Anyone born in the U.S. is a natural born CITIZEN." By doing it this way I never give my personal opinion. It is always WORD for WORD quotes from Supreme Court Justices "who do have the Constitutional authority to decide who is and who is not a natural born CITIZEN. They have the last say. And the Supreme Court standard birth circumstances has been that way since 1814.
Is Vivek qualified ... is he a natural-born citizen? We can not expect to have a Constitutional government unless we faithfully follow the Constitution. He was born in Cincinnati to non-citizen, resident alien parents. He is not a Natural Born Citizen... he is a native-born citizen.
Replies
CDR Kerchner
"I find it best to always stick with statements that have Constitutional authority behind them. For instance When someone states “He or she was born in the U.S. they are a natural born CITIZEN.” I go to the Supreme Court who has the Constitutional authority to say who is and who is not a natural born CITIZEN. Then post one or two of these quotes >>>
The Supreme Court standard birth circumstance that must be met to be a natural born CITIZEN. Here is what the Supreme Court Justices say
>>> Justice Gray “all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens”
>>> Chief Justice Fuller in the same case >> “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Justice Grier “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Chief Justice Waite “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens,”
>>> Justice Livingston “The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
>>> Chief Justice Fuller (in dissent) “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
Finally In Perkins v Elg Chief Justice Hughes called the defendant Ms Elg A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN then described her birth circumstances –Miss Elg was *****born in Brooklyn, New York, *****on October 2, 1907. Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to ***1906, and her father was naturalized here in that year.*** The law then was wives became U.S. Naturalized CITIZENS automatically when their husband’s were naturalized. <<< So Ms Elg ***was born in the U.S. of CITIZEN parents. I say the Supreme Court standard because that is the only way the Supreme Court has ever described the birth circumstances of a natural born CITIZEN.
NEVER EVER has the Supreme Court stated "Anyone born in the U.S. is a natural born CITIZEN." By doing it this way I never give my personal opinion. It is always WORD for WORD quotes from Supreme Court Justices "who do have the Constitutional authority to decide who is and who is not a natural born CITIZEN. They have the last say. And the Supreme Court standard birth circumstances has been that way since 1814.
CLEAR AS A BELL. VIVEK is HIDING THIS.
Is Vivek qualified ... is he a natural-born citizen? We can not expect to have a Constitutional government unless we faithfully follow the Constitution. He was born in Cincinnati to non-citizen, resident alien parents. He is not a Natural Born Citizen... he is a native-born citizen.
See: Vivek Ramaswamy NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States t...