A Berkeley-trained ideologue born in Vietnam has single-handedly overturned American immigration law.
Miranda Du, the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, ruled today that illegal aliens cannot be prosecuted for illegally re-entering the country due to immigration law's "Disparate Impact" against "Latinx" individuals.
According to court documents obtained by National Justice, the defendant was Gustavo Carrillo-Lopez, a career Mexican drug trafficker who has now been caught inside the country a third time.
Carillo-Lopez was removed from the country in 1999 and again in 2012, when he was convicted for selling drugs and beating his wife. The illegal alien was found in the country again in 2019, where he was found in possession of multiple firearms and large quantities of cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin intended for distribution. By 2020, a Grand Jury indicted him under criminal law that forbids deported aliens from reentering the country.
Relying heavily on a political narrative developed by "Afro-Latinx" UCLA history professor and anti-white activist Kelly Lytle Hernandez, Judge Du declared that Section 1326 of the Immigration and Nationality Act is illegitimate because a few supporters of the law used the term "wetback" in1952.
read more here: https://national-justice.com/nevada-federal-judge-unilaterally-upends-american-immigration-law-because-its-racist
Replies
When will Congress start impeaching activist judges... this sort of Judicial Fiat is what happens in the third world... impeach this judge.. The GOP in the House of Representatives needs to draft Articles of Impeachment to remote this judge... and a host of other activist judges.
Yes!!!
I do not comprehend why these judges have been allowed to get away with this for so long. They should have been put in their place at the very first. The Congress makes laws, they do not. They may render their opinion and the Congress will decide the next step.
It has become abundantly clear that many judges have politicized and prostituted their respective offices in various ways by infusing social trends and personal bias into their judgments and are no longer capable of unbiased Constitutional objectivity. The common sense preservation of the Republic seems to elude them.
It seems clear that many congressional "representatives" are so busy weighing public opinion and trying to please their donors that they have forgotten or simply don't care about why they were elected in the first place. Hence they allow these usurpers and interlopers to cross boundaries and render the three branches of government moot.