Federal judge blocks suspension of right to carry firearms in public ordered by New Mexico governor

It is really almost simple. Take what the devil has meant for evil and turn it for good. They like gangs. We form groups.

Posse Comitatus Act, USE it.

Description

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes which limits the——powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies——within the United States.

Originally published: June 18, 1878

Enacted by: the 45th United States Congress

Other short titles: Knott Amendment; Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Public law: Pub. L. 45–263

U.S.C. sections created: 18 U.S.C. § 1385

So, in terms of now, Constitutional Sheriffs have full authority and jurisdiction to interpose, or stand between unconstitutional and anti-Natural Law (Declaration of Independence) liberties and rights, and they have the full authority and jurisdiction to defend private property——which does include our health, our children's bodies, hearts, minds and souls, and our neighbor's as ourselves.

It's called shoving back. This crap is rolling downhill. Shove it back uphill. The idea is take the Posse Comitatus Act, and extend it's authority to all government violence against our rights. The case can be made that violence is violence, no matter the source, the government is actiing with violence in various forms, one upon another, Who needs the military when Fauci, the FDA and school boards are the ones doing violence.

Since the govco is using administrative and unconstitutional force against anyone with varying viewpoints, it is essentially a show of force, equal to the use of military in both force and effect. When there is no way out, it is force and unequivacable force. If they can force viewpoints that men are women, then words mean little to nothing, so force is therefore—force, whether military or judicial or administrative or any other.

It is NO dfiferent from the right to assemble being now equated to the right to steal, kill, destroy, loot, attack, beat, molest, kick, fire, shame, prosecute and persecute. Proof is in the mindless idiot Mayors who fired police and let looting begin, along with beatings and murders.

We just take it as the entire Federal govco enforcing anti-Natural Rights and Constitutional Jurisdictions. We need the Sheriffs to appoint deputees—even and entire town—and to interpose between us and them. In school boards, City Councils, businesses that do not allow free speech, etc.

Interposition: An Overlooked Tool of American Constitutionalism

Christian G. Fritz, University of New Mexico - School of LawFollow
https://www.google.com/search?q=Interposition+book&rlz=1C5CHFA_...

Book Title

Union and States' Rights: A History and Interpretation of Interposition, Nullification, and Secession 150 Years After Sumter

Editor

Neil H. Cogan

First Page

299 pages

Description

The third book in the &LAW series addresses the perpetual issue of state sovereignty in the federal union”˜states' rights.' From the 1770s, through the Confederate states' secession, and continuing until now, a central issue of governance is state power to object to, cancel, or be immune from federal law. The issue is fervently debated in the political arena by Tea Party efforts to limit federal intervention in education and health care; and the nullification movement efforts to prevent federal gun control and marijuana regulations. And it is a linchpin of the Supreme Court's ruling on the Voting Rights Act. This volume provides an intelligent voice in the debate about states' rights”interposition, nullification, secession, constitutional amendment”150 years after Fort Sumter.

https://www.amazon.com/Remedy-State-Interposition-Nullification-Cha...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/20...

excerpt: My first post introduced both the book and “The Myth of Judicial Supremacy” in constitutional interpretation. My second post used the example of “Lincoln Versus Judicial Supremacy” to illustrate our general proposition that the Constitution does not itself embrace the notion of judicial supremacy, but instead admits of multiple, independent interpreters, none of whom is literally bound by the views of any of the others.

If we want our Constitutional Republic back we better start using it, knowing it, forcing the issues based on our rights and right to defend ourselves, our lives, liberties, family's, property and neighbors, as ourselves.

45th United States Congress - Google Search

Replies

Jea9 September 14, 2023 at 11:07am

It is really almost simple. Take what the devil has meant for evil and turn it for good. They like gangs. We form groups.

Posse Comitatus Act, USE it.

Description
The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes which limits the——powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies——within the United States.

Originally published: June 18, 1878

Enacted by: the 45th United States Congress

Other short titles: Knott Amendment; Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Public law: Pub. L. 45–263

U.S.C. sections created: 18 U.S.C. § 1385

So, in terms of now, Constitutional Sheriffs have full authority and jurisdiction to interpose, or stand between unconstitutional and anti-Natural Law (Declaration of Independence) liberties and rights, and they have the full authority and jurisdiction to defend private property——which does include our health, our children's bodies, hearts, minds and souls, and our neighbor's as ourselves.

It's called shoving back. This crap is rolling downhill. Shove it back uphill. The idea is take the Posse Comitatus Act, and extend it's authority to all government violence against our rights. The case can be made that violence is violence, no matter the source, the government is actiing with violence in various forms, one upon another, Who needs the military when Fauci, the FDA and school boards are the ones doing violence.

Since the govco is using administrative and unconstitutional force against anyone with varying viewpoints, it is essentially a show of force, equal to the use of military in both force and effect. When there is no way out, it is force and unequivacable force. If they can force viewpoints that men are women, then words mean little to nothing, so force is therefore—force, whether military or judicial or administrative or any other.

It is NO dfiferent from the right to assemble being now equated to the right to steal, kill, destroy, loot, attack, beat, molest, kick, fire, shame, prosecute and persecute. Proof is in the mindless idiot Mayors who fired police and let looting begin, along with beatings and murders.

We just take it as the entire Federal govco enforcing anti-Natural Rights and Constitutional Jurisdictions. We need the Sheriffs to appoint deputees—even and entire town—and to interpose between us and them. In school boards, City Councils, businesses that do not allow free speech, etc.

"

Interposition: An Overlooked Tool of American Constitutionalism

Christian G. Fritz, University of New Mexico - School of LawFollow
https://www.google.com/search?q=Interposition+book&rlz=1C5CHFA_...

Book Title

Union and States' Rights: A History and Interpretation of Interposition, Nullification, and Secession 150 Years After Sumter

Editor

Neil H. Cogan

First Page

299 pages

Description

The third book in the &LAW series addresses the perpetual issue of state sovereignty in the federal union”˜states' rights.' From the 1770s, through the Confederate states' secession, and continuing until now, a central issue of governance is state power to object to, cancel, or be immune from federal law. The issue is fervently debated in the political arena by Tea Party efforts to limit federal intervention in education and health care; and the nullification movement efforts to prevent federal gun control and marijuana regulations. And it is a linchpin of the Supreme Court's ruling on the Voting Rights Act. This volume provides an intelligent voice in the debate about states' rights”interposition, nullification, secession, constitutional amendment”150 years after Fort Sumter.

https://www.amazon.com/Remedy-State-Interposition-Nullification-Cha...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/20...

excerpt: My first post introduced both the book and “The Myth of Judicial Supremacy” in constitutional interpretation. My second post used the example of “Lincoln Versus Judicial Supremacy” to illustrate our general proposition that the Constitution does not itself embrace the notion of judicial supremacy, but instead admits of multiple, independent interpreters, none of whom is literally bound by the views of any of the others.

If we want our Constitutional Republic back we better start using it, knowing it, forcing the issues based on our rights and right to defend ourselves, our lives, liberties, family's, property and neighbors, as ourselves.

45th United States Congress - Google Search

This reply was deleted.