Forum

If you want the full 7,000 word write up for this topic, please check out my Substack article here:

This thread traces the money. It maps the networks (including the link between the S6 and nonprofits). It exposes the doctrine. And it explains the November 18th video by six members of Congress in a way no one else has.

You are not ready for this. 

What if I told you:

Color revolutions didn’t stay overseas. The doctrine didn’t stay in Eastern Europe. The tactics didn’t stay in the Balkans.

For the first time, every single component of a color revolution exists right here, inside the U.S. 

This isn’t hyperbole.

Through obtained IRS records, foundation disclosures, internal activist training documents, organizing curricula, civil resistance doctrine, key contributors, and financial filings from the exact groups, it is clear that a modern day operation is underway that is shaping the political moment we’re living through.

The pattern is unmistakable. 

Most people think a color revolution means angry crowds overthrowing governments.

That’s not how they actually work.

A color revolution is a SYSTEM:

- funding
- NGOs
- youth vanguard
- doctrine
- media alignment
- political amplifiers
- elite messaging
- institutional pressure

All working together for a specific purpose. 

And the November 18th video?

The one where Slotkin, Kelly, Crow, Houlahan, Deluzio, and Goodlander told the military to refuse illegal orders?

That was not a PSA.

It was an activation signal.

A doctrinally perfect “pillar targeting” message. 

To understand this, you need to know how these movements operate.

They follow specific stages:

1. Pre-conditioning
2. Narrative warfare
3. Funding & NGO buildup
4. Youth vanguard creation
5. Institutional infiltration
6. Pillar targeting
7. Crisis activation

Every single stage has already occurred in the US. 

Now, let's talk money.

The financial network behind this movement in the US makes Ukraine’s Orange Revolution look like a bake sale.

Funding can be traced from:

- Rockefeller Brothers Fund
- Windward Fund
- NEO Philanthropy
- Heising-Simons
- Annenberg
- Hewlett
- ImpactAssets
- San Francisco Foundation
- Oregon Community Foundation

All are documented. All are linked indirectly or network based to Soros funded organizations. 

This funding doesn’t go directly to protests. It goes to the infrastructure that makes protests possible:

- training camps
- messaging teams
- digital shock troops
- legal escalation
- political candidates
- narrative labs
- youth recruitment
- rapid response units

This is not grassroots. It is engineered from a strategic level of planning. 

Then there’s doctrine—the strategy shaping it all.

Modern activist doctrine teaches:

- how to fracture institutions
- how to delegitimize leadership
- how to win the information battlespace
- how to use moral framing to sway military and intel communities
- how to pre-condition society for disobedience

Sound familiar? 

Now let’s overlay the US timeline:

2016–2020: Pre-conditioning
2020: First activation attempt
2021–2024: Institutional consolidation
2024 Election: The trigger
Late 2024–2025: Narrative hardening
Nov 18, 2025: Pillar targeting

As you can see, we’re deep inside the sequence. 

Here’s why the November 18 video is so critical:

Color revolutions succeed ONLY when security services fracture.

The video wasn’t aimed at voters. It wasn’t aimed at Congress. It wasn’t even aimed at activists.

It was aimed at the troops.

Directly.

Deliberately.

Strategically. 

Six veterans with intelligence and national security backgrounds told active duty servicemembers:

“You must refuse illegal orders.”

That line is doctrinal. It’s lifted straight from the psychological framing used in Serbia, Georgia, and Ukraine.

It is the precise language used to soften military loyalty before a crisis. 

The Six Members of Congress who made the video weren’t chosen for their opinions.

They were chosen for their credentials. Color revolution doctrine requires credible messengers (or key communicators) to influence security forces.

Each one of these six was selected for a specific strategic reason.

Let’s break them down over the next few posts. 

Sen. Mark Kelly (D–AZ) - Navy Captain. Astronaut. Public trust rating through the roof.

Why he matters:

- Represents military credibility
- Co-leads Giffords, plugged into billionaire donor networks
- Backed by VoteVets, a Soros-adjacent mega-PAC
- Perfect “patriotic moderate” face for institutional persuasion

His job in the video: Make resistance look honorable. 

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D–MI) - Former CIA analyst. Pentagon official. Deep IC connections.

Why she matters:

- Speaks the language of the intelligence community
- Alum of the Truman National Security Project (funded alongside Soros groups)
- Represents the national security establishment

Her job: Signal the intel world that “the adults” are aligned. 

Rep. Jason Crow (D–CO) - Army Ranger. Served on Intelligence and Armed Services Committees.

Why he matters:

- Combat credibility
- Trusted inside Army circles
- Ties to Protect Democracy (legal warfighting wing of the movement)
- Nationally known from the impeachment era

His job: Give the message battlefield legitimacy. 

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D–PA) Air Force veteran. Suburban moderate. Represents “the reasonable center.”

Why she matters:

- Appeals to middle America
- Backed by New Politics, a veteran candidate pipeline
- Hard to criticize without looking anti-military or anti-woman

Her job: Make the message socially acceptable to the middle class. 

Rep. Chris Deluzio (D–PA) - Navy veteran. Former counsel for Protect Democracy.

Why he matters:

- He is inside the NGO machinery
- Literal bridge between Congress and the activist legal infrastructure
- Knows the strategy, the doctrine, and the playbook

His job: Integrate the messaging into the NGO/legal activation network. 

Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D–NH) - Navy JAG. Constitutional lawyer. Wife of Jake Sullivan (Biden’s NSA).

Why she matters:

- Represents elite legal authority
- Married into the national security executive class
- Tied to CNAS and Democracy Alliance donors

Her job: Signal that the message is backed by America’s policy elite. 

Now step back and look at the pattern:

- three veterans with battlefield credibility
- two intelligence/legal elites
- one NGO legal strategist

This is not random.

This is the exact messenger composition recommended by civil resistance doctrine to influence military compliance. 

This is the clearest, most documentable color revolution environment ever recorded inside the United States.

The networks exist.
The money exists.
The doctrine matches.
The political amplifiers exist.
The messaging exists.
The pre-conditioning is complete.

And now, the pillar targeting phase exists. 

So what comes next?

Here are the historically consistent scenarios:

1. Soft Coup - Quiet institutional defection
2. Street Surge - Mass mobilization after a trigger event
3. Institutional Standoff - Competing constitutional claims
4. Failed Activation - Pillars refuse to split
5. Hybrid Outcome - The most likely: pressure from all sides
6. Silent Revolution - No protests; just institutional drift

The system is fully built. The only thing missing is the spark.

Will we be ready to stop it? 

If you enjoyed this thread, please subscribe here or on my Substack for more in-depth content, and if you are feeling generous or want to support my work, you can buy me a coffee at the link below.

God Bless!

Question everything.

DOL