I listened to this from beginning to end. I actually listened to it with the propensity to believe the description, given the fact that Kimberly was asked to resign, which is at least prima facie an indication something bad is going on. That said, there was absolutely nothing in this recording that was remotely incriminating. Other than hearsay and vague accusations of corruption (corruption is a conclusion, not a premise), and accusations of potential improper behavior, there’s absolutely no evidence of anything at any point in this recording. It sounds like @bulllaw has a personal grievance, understandable as that may be, which explains his willingness to believe. It also explains his gratuitous use of the term “wow” throughout. 😂 What I did find curious about the guy on the other end of the call is when he said that they don’t accept big cash offerings because it usually means something “illegal, immoral or undoable”. Which sort of admits of the possibility that they do accept big cash if something is doable. I don’t know what the referenced report evidences, but on its face, this 16 minute recording is not much to go with.
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) October 17, 2026
I listened to this from beginning to end.
I actually listened to it with the propensity to believe the description, given the fact that Kimberly was asked to resign, which is at least prima facie an indication something bad is going on.
That said, there was absolutely nothing in this recording that was remotely incriminating.
Other than hearsay and vague accusations of corruption (corruption is a conclusion, not a premise), and accusations of potential improper behavior, there’s absolutely no evidence of anything at any point in this recording.
It sounds like @bulllaw
has a personal grievance, understandable as that may be, which explains his willingness to believe. It also explains his gratuitous use of the term “wow” throughout.What I did find curious about the guy on the other end of the call is when he said that they don’t accept big cash offerings because it usually means something “illegal, immoral or undoable”. Which sort of admits of the possibility that they do accept big cash if something is doable.
I don’t know what the referenced report evidences, but on its face, this 16 minute recording is not much to go with.
Replies