WOW 🚨 DAY 10 Hurricane Helene Update
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) October 8, 2024
Swannanoa Valley, North Carolina: Man on the ground working with local law enforcement, says there’s NEW requests “We also have heard of several requests for 1,000 body bags. They're asking other places to bring body bags in”
One single… pic.twitter.com/xGl3zvmo8c
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
The answer is THIS: Citizen's Common Law Grand Juries
5th A: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury." It means that Citizens who are trained and know that juries DO have the right to gather evidence for themselves, try the accused. They run the jury free from limitations by "judges" and "attorneys."
Hale v. Henkel, Justice Henry Brown stated, "we deem it entirely clear that under the practice in this country, at least, the examination of witnesses need not be preceded by a presentment or indictment formally drawn up, but that the grand jury may proceed, either upon their own knowledge or upon the examination of witnesses to inquire for themselves whether a crime cognizable by the court has been committed."
Briefly: dates back to 1166. The Magna Carta grants individuals the right to stand before a Grand Jury. Designed to exclude outside persons, including prosecutors. Colonial Grand Juries are part of our heritage. They followed the practice from England and began as a defense against the monarchy. American Grand Juries initiated prosecutions against corrupt agents of government in response to individuals. One MA Grand Jury indicted British soliders for crimes against colonialists. 1902, a Minneapolis GJ, on its own initiative, hired private detectives, collected evidence to indict the mayor and force the police chief to resign. In multiple cases, multiple Judges have supported the lawful nature of Citizen's Common Law Grand Juries.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (one of our best) wrote, "The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been texturally assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the government and the people. Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the Judicial Branch has been so to speak at arm's length. Judges' direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office." [id. at 57]
This needs to be understood and implemented by WE the People. It just takes a few to start the ball rolling.
It means Informed Citizens form a jury and try the case.
On a separate topic, all jurors also can try the law (whether constitutional or not, this is called "Nullification of the law,") It is legal and is our duty, not only our right.
The Fully Informed Jury Association is alive and well, and trains ordinary Citizens how to accomplish Nullification.
https://fija.org/
These are two important means that we Americans know nothing about until we dig in and find gold.
https://faca.fl-counties.com/themes/bootstrap_subtheme/sitefinity/d..
$ympathy & EMPATHY WILL NOT BE GENERATED BY ANY MARXIST-COMMUNIST LEANING GOVERNMENT. OUR "REPRESENTATIVES" IN D.C. HAVE SHOWN THEIR TRUE COLORS. THIS GOVERNMENT AND APPOINTED LACKEYS ARE THE ENEMY OF "WE THE PEOPLE". THEY NEED TO BE LOOKED OVER AND THE TRAITORS NEED TO BE IMPRISONED TILL HONEST JUDGES CAN TRY THEM AND SENTENCE THE GUILTY ACCORDINGLY.