According to the media's general judgment, 2020 U.S. voters are most concerned with purportedly complex issues of crime and justice. Voters should place no trust in this. This same media forbade itself to investigate a simple, yet objectively historic corruption scandal of national interest.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has almost certainly committed the most extensive spree of felonies by a congressperson in U.S. history. As a criminal, she also appears to be historically inept. Scores of verified items of evidence against her are in the public record. Omar has never challenged their authenticity and has never produced a single piece of evidence to support her version of events.
She faces a primary on Tuesday. She again won her party's endorsement. She again won House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's endorsement — and her funding.
The mainstream media judges this remarkable situation to be irrelevant to Minnesota voters, let alone the dominant concern. Editorial malpractice on issues of crime, justice, and the 2020 election spreads everywhere this summer; by no coincidence, the spread can be traced to irresponsible media coverage of a deadly riot in Rep. Omar's district.
Below are 32 new, verifiable, archived pieces of evidence of Omar's historic crime spree.
* * * * *
* * * * *
Above: One of many Somali-language tributes to "Colonel Nur Said Elmi," Rep. Ilhan Omar's father, sent from around the world by family, friends, and contacts following his tragic June 2020 death from a COVID-19 infection. As a high-ranking officer in Somalia's (U.S.-backed) military from the 1970s until 1991, he was well known by this name and title.
* * * * *
In mid-June, Ilhan Omar's father tragically died from a COVID-19 infection. Expressions of grief, condolences, and prayers arrived from around the world, but particularly from the Somali-speaking immigrant community of Minneapolis and from the U.K. By all accounts, he earned his reputation as a gentle, kind neighbor, well known and beloved within Cedar-Riverside, as he had been in Somalia.
His relevance to Rep. Omar's landmark scandal is, of course, his birth name. Upon arriving in the United States in 1995, he claimed to be "Nur Omar Mohamed" and received a Social Security number with this name. However, all appeared to know him as Nur Said. He presented himself as Nur Said. Both Ilhan and her sister Sahra Noor referred to their father as Nur Said (prior to deleting the evidence). He is identified on-screen as "Nur Said, Ilhan's father" in the 2018 documentary film "Time for Ilhan" and again as "Nur Said" in the credits. Twice.
Most importantly, British citizen Leila Nur Said Elmi declared her father to be "Nur Said Elmi, military officer" on her 1997 marriage application. (Click the link to see the application and a photo of Leila Nur Said Elmi with both Ilhan and Nur Said.)
read the rest here: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ilhan-omar-must-resign-new-evidence-from-nearly-three-dozen-somalis-reveals-a-probable-spree-of-felonies
Replies
Voters voted for this disreputable person because she is a Muslim running in a predominantly Muslim District‼️
And this. IS what we get for letting so many people in from Muslim countries‼️
She is here fraudulently, she became citizen fraudulently, and has broken many more laws.
she should have her citizenship revoked and deported immediately thereafter, and blacklisted from EVER RETURNING‼️
I can not find any confirmation that either of Kamala Harris's parents are or ever applied for US Citizenship... It appears that Sen. Harris may have been born to parents here illegally, overstaying educational visas without applying for permanent resident status or for US Citizenship. Someone needs to demand they produce evidence of their US Citizenship and their status to be in the US Legally when Kamala Harris was born... as it stands now I have found no claims to US Citizenship ...nothing in their bio's or internet articles cite actual US Citizenship. Her father is a Jamaican and her mother is a citizen of India. Citing her father as a Jamaican-American doesn't make him a bonafide US Citizen... we have naturalization laws and many have violated them and should not be permitted now to benefit from their crimes... violations of our immigration law.
Once the Constitution, the Law of the Land, is compromised, it becomes easier to compromise it again, and easy soon becomes a necessity because a precedent has been set. There is almost no outcry concerning the elgibility of Harris.
Draining the swamp does not mean that DC is filled with polluted rancid murky disease infested putrid slop and ugly rancid critters thriving in puke. Well, it does. But in reality it means getting rid of corruption. It means exposing the corrupt people who thrive in corruption.
Trump is doing that. Prior to Trump was Obama, and everything negative was said to be Bush's Fault. During Dubyuh's administration he never faced an investigation or an impeachment attempt. He did his eight years. The Left then put up a phony fraud and used racism as a means to get his sorry rear end into the chief seat. The republicans put up a phony conservative, and followed with yet another to oppose Obama. After him it was Clinton' s gig, to follow up for another eight years. But, then along came Trump.
And he upset the apple cart completely. Ruined the plan. Enraged the Liberal Left. Called them what they were, in plain terms, in street language that everybody understood clearly. His Make America Great Again campaign illustrated how corrupt we had become and draining the swamp was what was needed.
He has been stunningly successful in exposing the corrupt people and the media protecting them. There is no doubt who the fake news networks are, and a lot less doubt as to who the corrupt political types are. And it is now the Justice Department who must act thoroughly and with purpose to clean it up and bring real justice to those who need it most of all due to always being immune to it.
President Trump is Constitutionally elgible, and also deserving due to his astonishing accomplishments, to be reelected as the President of The United States of America. Those oppossing him are not qualified. Biden suffers from dementia. Harris would become president. She is not mentally sound either, let alone qualified. She doesn't have American values in her mind and would be much worse than Obama. So bad that she would finish what he only started.
well said, Sir!
All Americans can clearly see how great Trump has made America and they remember the chaos, riots and fiscal disarray left behind by obummer all too well. We are still suffering from the debt increase under obummer and we are blessed to have a successful business man in office, who is cleaning up the budget mess. For all these reasons, Americans will give Trump another landslide victory in November and they will put the House back into Republican hands.
The question of elgibility is really not a question at all. It becomes one due to so many believing, or at least claiming that they do, that the wording used in the Constitution is ambiguous at best and subject to interpretation, to the point that only Justices of the Supreme Court can decide the true meaning.
We, the people, are expected to live by decisions of the Court. Right or wrong the black robed politically appointed people are supposed to be the arbiters of truth and justice, real justice that is, on truth being the ultimate factor in their decisions. Yet the Supreme Court only considers cases that they deem worthy of consideration, and those decisions are not necessarily based on finding the truth of a matter, but on an opinion of whether or not the matter has merit enough to warrant consideration.
Presidential elgibility seems to be one of those matters . And in law opinions reign supreme, not facts and the search for truth. And the times in which one lives have a heavy influence on the courts as well as the people. That point was made before, and dismissed by some as bs. If it is bs, then please tell me why it is important to appoint responsible and honest people to the Court? And Why does the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal always decide politically rather than with truth and justice?
As for President Trump. He is running to be reelected. Does anyone think that he, as a person, should right now voice his view on a gotcha question such as this? Look, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was the man who swore Obama in as President. What in the hell does that tell you about the Supreme Court? Does the Constitution matter, at all times? Look at it like this. Does the power of the people have the right to destroy our system of Government? To make the Constitution null and void?
NO. Yet the times in which we find ourselves, sadly, it seems that the answer would be Yes, indeed. And that would be politically correct. Obama was elgible because he was a democrat, he was black, and he was groomed for it. And we suffered, and still are, through his eight years, and it continues to poison the minds of many just as the aftermath of Clinton does. Harris is elgible for the same reasons. And if she gets in office, it will be all over for what America was intended to be.
very interesting.
Government by the people, for the people and of the people, derives its power and right to govern by CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE... So, yes... the people have the right... .nay the duty to dissolve any government that fails to live by consent of the people... and the people have the duty to their heritage to form such governments as may provide for their future success and happiness.
We are experiencing nearly every abuse our forefathers suffered under the reign of King George just prior to the American Revolutionary War... if our forefather's heritage yet remains a driving force within us, a new revolution is just over the horizon, and with the coming dawn that driving force may spill over into the main streets of America.
Those fools pushing America to the brink may awake to find their own living rooms aflame... and rivers red with the blood of patriots and tyrants... The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the natural manure of freedom, the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Obama was president by the consent of people. He was put up, and marketed as some sort of a super hero and the people, enough of them anyway, fell for it hook, line, and sinker. Thomas Jefferson warned against having a majority rule, a democracy, because of the "Tyranny of the Majority" as he put it. He also claimed that the public was not known for making wise decisions.
This consent of the people is often damned dangerous. The majority can be swayed and influenced into believing and accepting just about anything.
There is no way that we can be certain Obama's election was not rigged... we can be certain that his certification of eligibility to hold the Office of President was rigged. What makes anyone believe our current electoral system produces results that reflect THE PEOPLE'S WILL & CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED?
Our electoral system is gerrymandered and rigged... the people's consent to be governed has been hijacked by a plutocracy of elites. The People no longer hold an exclusive franchise on their ballot in America. Elections have been replaced by carefully choreographed events, which produces coerced government, the product of votes cast for the lesser of two evils... that is not choice, that is coercion.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 28 Next