I can find no evidence that she ever argued a case.
— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) October 24, 2024
Not an appeal, not a crunch trial court motion … nothing.
If she’d argued a Ninth Circuit appeal, there would be video. And if she’d argued a case for California, when state AG in the Supreme Court, there would be audio.
And… https://t.co/CD5vJGs73P
Kamala Harris is a fraud.
— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) October 23, 2024
As the NRO article shows, she claimed she prosecuted hundreds of cases, then dialed that back to 50, then dialed that back to “under 30.”
The reality is that she did no more than 10 cases. And if you credit her boss, Hallinan, she did only one case in… https://t.co/1wgGf482l8 pic.twitter.com/GhSgSjLAXJ
Replies
Makes sense since she doesn't make sense.