Judge Strikes Down California Law Requiring “Diversity” On Company Boards of Directors |
 https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-768x512.jpg 768w, https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-600x400.jpg 600w, https://www.daybreakinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-02T165037Z_1_LYNXNPEI3109B_RTROPTP_4_USA-DAILYLIFE-450x300.jpg 450w" alt="" width="400" height="auto" />From the story: In a statement after the ruling, Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, decried the law as part of “one of the most blatant and significant attacks in the modern era on constitutional prohibitions against discrimination.” California has led the country in pushing companies to diversify their top ranks, starting with a 2018 law that required corporate boards have at least one woman. Companies that do not comply face fines (NY Times). From Carol Platt Liebau: The California law reinforced the bigoted premise that people’s immutable characteristics were what mattered most about them. This pernicious assumption undercuts the whole idea of merit. Ironically, these sorts of laws hurt high achieving members of so-called “underrepresented communities” by raising unfair doubts about whether they’ve been selected for their abilities or because they check a box (Townhall Review). |
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
There's still some sanity on the west coast!