Replies

  • Jeanine:  I.M.H.O., Some bunch is starting to mess with this site,, Also i am receiving E-Mails , the contents of which would lure us away from here or tend to confusethe reader as to WHO THE REAL VILLAINS AGAINST OUR U.S.A. ARE.

  • All votes should be out in the open so their constituents can decide if they want to relect them in the mid terms

    • AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH SESSION OF CONGRESS, SHOULDN'T ALL MEMBERS RECEIVE AN ORIENTATION SPEECH -EMPHASIZING THAT ALL THEIR BUSINESS SHALL ONLY PERTAIN TO THE BETTERMENT OF OUR NATION and OUR CITIZENS.......AND ANYONE DEPARTING FROM THAT MODEL SHALL BE GIVEN "WALKING PAPERS"--( LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER ITEM FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION-EHH ? ), AND MR. TRUMP WOULD BE THE IDEAL COMMANDER IN CHIEF TO GIVE SUCH A SPEECH.

    • ABSOLUTELY!

    • Instead, as soon as they are elected to Congress-- They are assigned an AIPAC handler. American Isreali PAC. I am not against Israel, I pray for the peace of Israel as the Bible instructs; but I am against this as priority #1. I see no training or understanding promoted or taught about our rights and liberties. Our Constitution and Declaration and our own people should be first. The strength of our Constitution rests upon our rights and liberties as declared in the breadth of our Declaration. We are Created, with life and liberty and with all freedoms---to do no harm and to be free people. We have as of yet, no cohesive understanding of how the two work together and that must change. 

    • JEA9, VERY GOOD POST, THANKS!!!

    • Thanks, Michael. Appreciate it.

    • SUPER JEA9 : Glad you stated this point.  Earlier i stated that we should have a page established for changes we'd like to have in government , perhaps put into effect at a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. As you state this current arrangemeny does not RE EMPHASIZE OUR AMERICAN FREEDOMS, which should be formally RESTATED to CONGRESS PERSONS. This would go hand in hand with an ORIENTATION BRIEFING, Reiterating the purpose for which those CONGRESS PERSONS are there ! ! !

    • It needs to be more than that, somehow. It's almost as if someone needs to be postitioned, such as Massie or someone of his high caliber, to speak to Congress pertaining to each and every bill, as to whether that bill fulfills the limited authorities and jurisdictions of Art. I, and how exactly, the implementation of the bill either succeeds or fails on those same criteria. A teaching, advising position, with authority in some way as well.

    • Actually, this is what needs to happen. One Amendment must be written. It must require from all new legislation, the following:
      Proof that this new legislation is authorized specifically in Art. I. Proof that this legislation does not violate any natural rights. Proof that this legislation fulfills "Necessary and Proper," in order to even be brought to the floor. Othewise, through it on the floor and light it on fire. First throw tea bags on it, then light it and sweep up the trash. sarc intended.

      And then, all existing legislation must go through the wringer as well, haul it out, study it to see whether it is within jurisdication and authority of Art. I. If it does not, tear it up, throw it on the floor and burn it. Again. Again. All.

This reply was deleted.