Forum

🚨 LEAKED: BLUE STATE SEDITION? 🚨

A Common Interest Agreement signed just 3 days after Trump’s landslide victory reveals a coordinated effort by 22 blue states, DC, and San Francisco to resist Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

At first glance, this might… pic.twitter.com/PSfVatqqsX

— Voltaire's Looking Glass 🇺🇸 (@DrakeBehren) February 11, 2025'

A Common Interest Agreement signed just 3 days after Trump’s landslide victory reveals a coordinated effort by 22 blue states, DC, and San Francisco to resist Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

At first glance, this might seem like a routine legal strategy. But dig deeper: this wasn’t a reactive lawsuit—it was a pre-planned operation, crafted before Trump even took office.

Legal vs. Seditious?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 2384 (Seditious Conspiracy), it’s illegal for two or more persons to:
✔️ Conspire to overthrow or oppose the U.S. government by force.
✔️ Obstruct the execution of U.S. laws.

So does this qualify? Not outright—but it’s dangerously close.

These officials weren’t defending an existing law; they were actively plotting to block a sitting president’s lawful actions before he even signed them.

Instead of legislating change, they sought to litigate their way to victory, nullifying the election’s mandate in the courts.

This was a direct assault on executive power, using legal mechanisms as a weaponized resistance strategy against a democratically elected administration.

The Real Agenda: Future Voter Lock?

Instead of fixing crime, inflation, or border security, Democrats’ first move after losing the election was ensuring that children of illegal immigrants could become future voters.

It’s not about protecting rights—it’s about protecting political power.

How many other “Common Interest” agreements exist?
Who funded this?
Why was this their #1 priority?

Congress and the DOJ must investigate NOW.