That may be, but I am inclined to think some things are for men and some things are for women. Security is security and sometimes force, action, strength and manly strategy is necessary. Just my opinion.
Strategy is important for both men and women, it's used in all aspects of life, even in raising children. While I agree some things are for men and some for women, securing a museum or even a prison is all strategy, the designer of the system would not likely be on the premises at the time of a brake-in, or a brake-out.
True, but I have doubts. Yes, mental matters, strategy matters and yes, likely, she wouldn't even be there. But IF anything became physical, she is a detriment unless she is quick draw mcgraw or trained in hand to hand combat or martial arts. Muscle mass matters, as does training. In truth, I prefer to see men in men's roles when it comes to guarding, protection and related matters. I also believe that some of 'gender confusion" comes from the current lack of identify all the way back to the source of family structure.
There is a brilliant writer on Substack, he and his wife write 'Biblical Man' and 'Biblical Womanhood,' who delve into what the lack of Christian teaching has done in this country, creating and leading to sexual role confusion and destruction of the family unit. Different topic but that is part of why I think as I do.
Replies
Morons. Women are not men. Hello? ? ?
There's no reason why a woman couldn't do this job and do it well.....they chose the wrong woman for the wrong reason!
That may be, but I am inclined to think some things are for men and some things are for women. Security is security and sometimes force, action, strength and manly strategy is necessary. Just my opinion.
Strategy is important for both men and women, it's used in all aspects of life, even in raising children.
While I agree some things are for men and some for women, securing a museum or even a prison is all strategy, the designer of the system would not likely be on the premises at the time of a brake-in, or a brake-out.
True, but I have doubts. Yes, mental matters, strategy matters and yes, likely, she wouldn't even be there. But IF anything became physical, she is a detriment unless she is quick draw mcgraw or trained in hand to hand combat or martial arts. Muscle mass matters, as does training.
In truth, I prefer to see men in men's roles when it comes to guarding, protection and related matters. I also believe that some of 'gender confusion" comes from the current lack of identify all the way back to the source of family structure.
There is a brilliant writer on Substack, he and his wife write 'Biblical Man' and 'Biblical Womanhood,' who delve into what the lack of Christian teaching has done in this country, creating and leading to sexual role confusion and destruction of the family unit. Different topic but that is part of why I think as I do.