BREAKING: A Michigan judge just ruled that the Democrat Secretary of State's election manual issued to local election officials is unconstitutional & against state law. He is also mandating strict signature verification for mail in votes in the upcoming 2024 election
— George (@BehizyTweets) June 13, 2024
"The Court… pic.twitter.com/mVmq7QA4td
A Michigan judge just ruled that the Democrat Secretary of State's election manual issued to local election officials is unconstitutional & against state law. He is also mandating strict signature verification for mail in votes in the upcoming 2024 election
"The Court declares that the "initial presumption" of validity in signature verification of absentee-ballot applications and envelopes mandated by the December 2023 guidance manual issued by defendants is incompatible with the Constitution and laws of the State of Michigan. For similar reasons, the Court declares that the catch line referring to an "initial presumption of validity" in R 168.22 is incompatible with the Constitution and laws of the State of Michigan. Accordingly, those provisions must be excised from the guidance manual and the catch line in R 168.22" - Judge Christopher Yates
BREAKING: MI SoS @JocelynBenson has been found in violation of law by SEVEN separate courts! In the latest ruling, she once again attempted to direct election officials to presume signatures on ballot envelopes and absentee ballot applications are valid (i.e. unilaterally remove… pic.twitter.com/ROcW0JNGzo
— Patrick Colbeck✝️ (@pjcolbeck) June 13, 2024
MI SoS
@JocelynBenson
has been found in violation of law by SEVEN separate courts! In the latest ruling, she once again attempted to direct election officials to presume signatures on ballot envelopes and absentee ballot applications are valid (i.e. unilaterally remove signature verification requirement). She has exhibited a pattern of disregard for our laws and court rulings. Clear case for contempt charges and jail time for MI SoS.
NOTE: Number EIGHT likely after oral hearing of O'Halloran v Benson by MI Supreme Court on Tuesday
Replies