Seven people nobody will name… and that is the entire foundation of this story. Seven anonymous voices whispering to Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian at MS NOW, one week before Election Day, that some FBI agent somewhere might get handed a warrant and told to pick up a voting machine and actually look at it. Think about what they are afraid of here. Not that the counts are wrong, not that a single vote got flipped, not that anybody broke the law… they are afraid somebody with a badge and a warrant signed by a federal judge might hold the evidence in their hands. If these machines are so clean, why does the idea of anyone opening one make these people break out in hives? Honest systems do not need a panic story on the front page the week of the vote. Here is what the article actually says once you get past the headline. The FBI took ballots in Fulton County in January on a warrant. The FBI got electronic voting records and equipment out of the Maricopa review in March after grand jury subpoenas. Neither one has produced charges yet, and yet somehow the FBI is the scandal. A state attorney general, who would not even let them print which state, has already written to the federal judges asking for a chance to object before any warrant gets signed for ballots or machines. And so called advocates for free and fair elections are lining up ways to coach FBI agents on when to say no. Activists coaching federal agents on how to refuse a lawful warrant, and they wrote it up as the heroes of the story. Then they quote a current FBI official who says they expect "at least one U.S. attorney and one FBI agent to be willing to sign on to such actions." Sign on to what… a warrant? Reviewed and approved by a judge? That is the nightmare they are selling you, an investigation that actually reaches the boxes. I have been saying for years that these machines are a black box nobody is allowed to open, and the people who tried to look got raided, sued, and in Tina Peters' case locked in a cell. The same crowd that cheered when the FBI searched Tina's home over a forensic image now wants you terrified that the FBI might look at a machine. Funny how the rule only ever runs one direction, right? Kash, Todd… the evidence is the machine. Get the warrants, follow the law, and do not let a story built on seven people who will not give their names scare you off the one thing that settles this for every American who votes next week. Pray, Stand, Speak, ACT.
— Joe Oltmann (@Joeoltmann) October 29, 2026
Seven people nobody will name… and that is the entire foundation of this story. Seven anonymous voices whispering to Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian at MS NOW, one week before Election Day, that some FBI agent somewhere might get handed a warrant and told to pick up a voting machine and actually look at it.
Think about what they are afraid of here. Not that the counts are wrong, not that a single vote got flipped, not that anybody broke the law… they are afraid somebody with a badge and a warrant signed by a federal judge might hold the evidence in their hands. If these machines are so clean, why does the idea of anyone opening one make these people break out in hives? Honest systems do not need a panic story on the front page the week of the vote.
Here is what the article actually says once you get past the headline. The FBI took ballots in Fulton County in January on a warrant. The FBI got electronic voting records and equipment out of the Maricopa review in March after grand jury subpoenas. Neither one has produced charges yet, and yet somehow the FBI is the scandal. A state attorney general, who would not even let them print which state, has already written to the federal judges asking for a chance to object before any warrant gets signed for ballots or machines. And so called advocates for free and fair elections are lining up ways to coach FBI agents on when to say no. Activists coaching federal agents on how to refuse a lawful warrant, and they wrote it up as the heroes of the story.
Then they quote a current FBI official who says they expect "at least one U.S. attorney and one FBI agent to be willing to sign on to such actions." Sign on to what… a warrant? Reviewed and approved by a judge? That is the nightmare they are selling you, an investigation that actually reaches the boxes.
I have been saying for years that these machines are a black box nobody is allowed to open, and the people who tried to look got raided, sued, and in Tina Peters' case locked in a cell. The same crowd that cheered when the FBI searched Tina's home over a forensic image now wants you terrified that the FBI might look at a machine. Funny how the rule only ever runs one direction, right?
Kash, Todd… the evidence is the machine. Get the warrants, follow the law, and do not let a story built on seven people who will not give their names scare you off the one thing that settles this for every American who votes next week.
Replies