The editors at the National Review have released an op/ed that essentially endorses widespread Democrat vote rigging and denigrates the efforts of whistleblowers who have attested via sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury to witnessing fraud on election day.
The editors paid lip service to concerns “about the security of mail-in ballots and the process of counting votes” but only to sweep the massive evidence of fraud under the rug. They claim that Trump has circulated “already-debunked claims and crackpot conspiracy theories about Dominion voting systems,” without doing much of anything to address many credible claims about the vote hacking software.
National Review proclaims the honor and the integrity of Republican officials who are refusing to investigate the electoral abnormalities or use their constitutionally-delegated powers to overturn the steal.
“Trump’s most reprehensible tactic has been to attempt, somewhat shamefacedly, to get local Republican officials to block the certification of votes and state legislatures to appoint Trump electors in clear violation of the public will,” the editors wrote.
read more:
Replies