Forum

Agnotology is found in a variety of public-policy issues where one side has manufactured enough doubt through false statements, inflammatory rhetoric, and data from dubious sources that they can mislead public opinion in a significant way, at least for a time. But by acting in such a manner, the liberal-biased media earned a collective “F” for their performance. However, their dysfunctional disconnect will not change as long as the neo-liberal media’s analysis of the world continues to ignore that many of today’s most fashionable political and social causes are essentially replays of earlier flawed ideological fads. Even more so if they continue to ignore the very people whom they claim to want to talk with and get to know.

A network of tens of millions of people across the country, frustrated with left-wing government, academia, entertainment, and media empires decided to act. Yet even now, when you watch the analysis of the change, what is offered is more naval gazing by the people who didn’t look up over the years of BObama/biden, as wages had fallen, costs had exploded, freedom decreased and violence increased and millions of Americans had cried out for some relief.

Most of the time when an issue boils over into the headlines, left-wing media representatives spend hours gathering select details of the story, preparing select experts on the front lines and fine tuning select key points, all the while ignoring significant other relevant matters, then spending countless more hours trying to get members of the liberal media to pay attention. And most of the time, if there is a story, you find members of the liberal media explaining what conservatives, or people of faith, or pro-life advocates or constitutionalists think. But God forbid that the actual people who are fighting good the fight on any specific issue get booked and are given the opportunity to speak for themselves.

And then there is the psychological approach to treating conservatism as some kind of weakness for which neo-liberal reporters and liberal academics either out right demonize or at best dismiss as lack of learning or response to economic pressures or a misplaced desire to return to the 1950s. 

New flash for them: Arriving at a different conclusion (which in this case is usually based on germane fact, sound logic and conclusions) is not deplorable; it’s a Constitutional right. However, many neo-liberal reporters, by the very nature of their questions, make it clear that their mind is made up, and we shouldn’t confuse them with the facts. The fact gathering ends when the left-wing media feels they have just enough to dismiss a point of view, regardless of the sagacity of that information. Or should neo- liberal reporters or producers book a conservative voice for a news package, they edit complex issues to one 7-second sound bite, ending with the liberal press telling the world what they “really” meant.  Even comedy shows routinely try to hide their intent, thinking sophisticated conservatives are too stupid to recognize that they will be the punch line. 

For neo-liberals it's clearly bullying if someone is mocked for their looks or sexual orientation but, it’s commentary and analysis if they are mocked for their political, moral, economic, or religious views, or the region of country they live in, or their support for a candidate they have every right to choose.

If we can’t even agree on what are the stories we see in the press or true, even what truth means, how can we have an honest conversation about complex issues like race, climate change, religion, foreign policy, the economy, our school system, artificial intelligence, or just about anything else that actually matters? Because the left-wing press is so unwilling to expose the truth, so committed to their ideology at the expense of the facts, tens of millions of Americans never hear well documented, highly sourced facts that could shed a dramatic new light on nearly everything that they see in the news on a daily basis. There’s a big difference between conspiracy theories and conspiracy facts, as   Lenin’s  rise to power is but one example. knowing what the difference is could prove vital for America’s future.