Replies

  • she is one delusional broad

  • Just you are above the law~

  • He's smart enough to know the whole system is corrupt, why would he bother. 

  • Her alcoholic infected brain along with her Trump Derangement Syndrom causes her to mae crazy statements.  The old Hag needs to go! 

  • Back in 2017, Pelosi said that, if Hillary would have won the Presidency in 2016, Nan would have soon retired. She hates Trump for winning the 2016 election, even though Nan says she has a "heart full of love". To this day, Nan feels she is duty bound to save ObamaCare, and other Democrat causes, and attempt to destroy President Trump. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/nancy-pelosi-would-have-reti...

    Pelosi: I would have retired had Clinton won
    Pelosi beat back a challenge to her leadership after the November election.
  • Chief Justice Roberts: “Congress has no enumerated constitutional power to conduct investigations or issue subpoenas, but we have held that each House has power ‘to secure needed information’ in order to legislate. The subpoenas must have a significant legislative purpose that is supported by sufficiently “detailed and substantial” evidence; whether Congress can reasonably get the information from other sources; the subpoenas are “no broader than reasonably necessary to support Congress’s legislative objective”; and whether the third parties’ compliance with the subpoenas would somehow burden the president. The Court reinforced the limitations to the subpoena power, including that the subpoena must serve a “valid legislative purpose,” and is proper only if it is “related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of Congress.” 
     
    In addition,The Court confirmed Congress’s authority to issue subpoenas, but noted it is not limitless. The Court reaffirmed that those subject to a congressional subpoena have both constitutional, common law and executive privileges—including attorney-client privilege—against the subpoena.
     
    The Court affirmed that Congress’s subpoena power cannot be used for law enforcement purposes. In other words, Congress cannot use its subpoena authority to put someone on trial for a crime or wrongdoing, nor does Congress have the “power to expose for the sake of exposure."
     
    The Court reaffirmed if Congress uses its authority to issue a subpoena and it is used as such against "opposite and rival political branches,” or  "rival Political Opponents" "[t]he subpoenas do not represent a run-of-the-mill legislative effort but rather a clash between rival branches of government and political opponents and are deemed illegal, unenforceable and thereby null and void.”
     
    Fact: Multiple Members of the J-6 Committee have gone on record stating that they will do everything in their powers to ensure President Trump will never hold public office again.
     
    That sure sounds like the Committee is going after a political opponent and by the Supreme Court's ruling above renders their committee and subpoenas illegal, unenforceable and null and void!

  • I wish he would with paper work she had national guard waiting for her to decide on help at congress. Dumb woman. They got Steve bannon they want to use it same to President Trump.

  • All this is a political campaign and the idiots can't defeat President Trumps on legal ballots now that want the committee to do their job they hate him more than Jesus 

  • Why should he testify when he didn't do anything wrong and if he does they will just alter everything he says.

  • LMAO...the Jan. 6 Committee is already a Schitt show. I really don't believe the morons on the committee truly believe Trump will testify. If they become convinced that he will, I expect that they will find a way to avoid being ustaged and emmbarrassed by the former POTUS, especially prior to election day. 

     

     

This reply was deleted.