President Trump declares Republican Dan Sullivan the FINAL VICTOR of the Alaska U.S. Senate race

Well, if we knew what our founders intended, we could. THIS IS our HISTORY. It is technically, extra-Constitutional but absolutely constitutional.

Citizen's Common Law Grand Juries. Verified by Col. Ronald Nelson. Bottom up Courts with powers to subpoena, above Article III courts, judges, opinions and orders. Formed by whomever, gather evidence, subpoena powers, try the case, enforced to Constitutional Sheriffs who do what is called Interposition. These juries can also Nullify unconstitutional anything by anyone or any company or anything.

—The Founding Fathers included the grand jury clause in the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment to ensure that citizens exercise oversight on the executive branch when it is seeking to try a person for crimes that subject them to imprisonment.https://www.acslaw.org/inbrief/praise-be-thee-grand-jury/

The United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment and the California Constitution call for grand juries. Throughout history, there have been actions to abolish the Grand Jury. The sentiment is still alive today.

Yet the Grand Jury is the only remaining institution not answerable to the administration, the politician or the legislator. It is the “ombudsman” or “watchdog” of the public interest. Those who appreciate and believe in the need to maintain this peoples’ panel must guard it by responsible conduct.

In the United States, Grand Juries were established to protect citizens and society and to keep a watchful eye on certain aspects of government. In 1791 they became part of the United States Constitution, the Fifth Amendment and Grand Juries became part of the California Constitution in 1879.

https://wp.sbcounty.gov/grandjury/history/

As England journeyed to the American colonies, so too did the grand jury. Each American colony instituted its own version of the grand jury, with variations found in how grand jurors were selected or appointed.5 Outside of criminal prosecutions, colonial-era grand juries were used for a variety of functions. They levied taxes, appointed public officials, and supervised public works.6 Certain colonies even allowed grand juries to audit public institutions and inspect jails.7 In the buildup to the American Revolution, grand juries became a tool for “outright resistance to the monarchy.”8 Despite British officials accusing newspaper publisher John Peter Zenger of printing libelous statements about the crown, a colonial grand jury refused to indict him – three times.9 After gaining independence from the British, Americans adhered to the idea that 1 1 BEALE, SARA, ET AL., GRAND JURY LAW & PRACTICE, § 1:2 (2d ed. 2002) 2 Ric Simmons, Article: Re-Examining the Grand Jury: Is There Room for Democracy in the Criminal Justice System?, 82 B.U.L. REV. 1, 6 (2002) 3 Id. at 9 (citing Helene E. Schwartz, Demythologizing the Historic Role of the Grand Jury, 10 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 701, 715 (1972)). The government later questioned the foreperson for the grand jury as to why no indictment was issued and ultimately imprisoned him in the Tower of London. BEALE at §1:2, 1-10. 4 Mark Kadish, Article: Behind the Locked Door of an American Grand Jury: Its History, Its Secrecy, and Its Process, 24 FLA. ST. U.L. REV. 1, 9 (1996). 5 BEALE at §1:3, 1-13. 6 Kadish at 10. 7 BEALE at §1:3, 1-13. 8 Kadish at 10. 9 Id. at 12. Zenger was ultimately prosecuted by a bill of information, which only emboldened the American preference for grand juries. 1 the grand jury could act as a great defender of liberty. In 1791, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted and, with it, the right to a grand jury was created. Continued Use Across the Country After its inclusion in the Constitution, the right to a grand jury was uniformly provided by individual states as well.10 By the mid-1800s, however, this consensus was quickly eroding. Contending that the grand jury had outlived its purpose and that its investigatory powers were infringing on personal liberties, multiple states removed the right to a grand jury from their constitutions.11 Around this same time, six newly admitted states declined to utilize the grand jury. Mostly western and sparsely populated, these states contended that the grand jury was too cumbersome and inefficient for their needs.12

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Boards/grandJury/Materials/2016/F...

There is zero, absolutely zero reason that this couldn't start in every small-town USA if they knew about it. My Grandpa would have done this is a heartbeat. So would have my uncles, my Dad and my Mom.

Imagine if this were part of a 3rd party platform and backed up by Constitutional Sheriffs who verified interposition and nullification. All these creeps would have been Gitmo'd or elsewhere by now.

It comes down to--how do we destroy the corporate hold or leash that controls us?

Here is what else is not known.

The original definition of "peers," as in a "jury of one's peers," is those "randomly drawn from a fair cross section of the local community," as In neighbors. Webster"s 1828 dictionary. The one that should be used whenever possible.

This coincides with what my Mother said, as one of the 1st Federal professional female employees back in the early 50's. She said gov would send someone to "interview" neighbors before hiring for a position. I think they may have done that with her or she wouldn't have known that.

Ironically, Trump is reviving doing this for citizenship applicants. Did they do this when you came applied for citizenship? Do you know?

How contorted they have made Truth. More preferences for judges and less and less for the common folk, who are the only ones beholden to no one. We do not serve money-masters. But the 'elites' sure do.

Replies

Paul Simmon November 8, 2026 at 5:48am

President Trump needs to issue an Executive Order and make Sullivan's victory official.
- ilona Trommler > Paul Simmon November 8, 2026 at 2:00pm
  
  This is an election issue, I don't see how Trump can just decide it.....becuause it's logical.
  We are looking at a difference of 102-105.000 votes higher than the Democrat, that's not close especially in Alaska with its small population.
- ilona Trommler > Paul Simmon November 8, 2026 at 6:41am
  
  Wait for the activist judge!
- Jea9 > ilona Trommler November 8, 2026 at 1:41pm
  
  And knock him out. Tired of them. Beyond tired of them. I have rope.
- ilona Trommler > Jea9 November 8, 2026 at 2:00pm
  
  Don't you wish we could?
- Jea9 > ilona Trommler November 8, 2026 at 2:23pm
  
  Well, if we knew what our founders intended, we could. THIS IS our HISTORY. It is technically, extra-Constitutional but absolutely constitutional.
  
  Citizen's Common Law Grand Juries. Verified by Col. Ronald Nelson. Bottom up Courts with powers to subpoena, above Article III courts, judges, opinions and orders. Formed by whomever, gather evidence, subpoena powers, try the case, enforced to Constitutional Sheriffs who do what is called Interposition. These juries can also Nullify unconstitutional anything by anyone or any company or anything.
  
  —The Founding Fathers included the grand jury clause in the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment to ensure that citizens exercise oversight on the executive branch when it is seeking to try a person for crimes that subject them to imprisonment.https://www.acslaw.org/inbrief/praise-be-thee-grand-jury/
  
  The United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment and the California Constitution call for grand juries. Throughout history, there have been actions to abolish the Grand Jury. The sentiment is still alive today.
  
  Yet the Grand Jury is the only remaining institution not answerable to the administration, the politician or the legislator. It is the “ombudsman” or “watchdog” of the public interest. Those who appreciate and believe in the need to maintain this peoples’ panel must guard it by responsible conduct.
  
  In the United States, Grand Juries were established to protect citizens and society and to keep a watchful eye on certain aspects of government. In 1791 they became part of the United States Constitution, the Fifth Amendment and Grand Juries became part of the California Constitution in 1879.
  
  https://wp.sbcounty.gov/grandjury/history/
  
  As England journeyed to the American colonies, so too did the grand jury. Each American colony instituted its own version of the grand jury, with variations found in how grand jurors were selected or appointed.5 Outside of criminal prosecutions, colonial-era grand juries were used for a variety of functions. They levied taxes, appointed public officials, and supervised public works.6 Certain colonies even allowed grand juries to audit public institutions and inspect jails.7 In the buildup to the American Revolution, grand juries became a tool for “outright resistance to the monarchy.”8 Despite British officials accusing newspaper publisher John Peter Zenger of printing libelous statements about the crown, a colonial grand jury refused to indict him – three times.9 After gaining independence from the British, Americans adhered to the idea that 1 1 BEALE, SARA, ET AL., GRAND JURY LAW & PRACTICE, § 1:2 (2d ed. 2002) 2 Ric Simmons, Article: Re-Examining the Grand Jury: Is There Room for Democracy in the Criminal Justice System?, 82 B.U.L. REV. 1, 6 (2002) 3 Id. at 9 (citing Helene E. Schwartz, Demythologizing the Historic Role of the Grand Jury, 10 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 701, 715 (1972)). The government later questioned the foreperson for the grand jury as to why no indictment was issued and ultimately imprisoned him in the Tower of London. BEALE at §1:2, 1-10. 4 Mark Kadish, Article: Behind the Locked Door of an American Grand Jury: Its History, Its Secrecy, and Its Process, 24 FLA. ST. U.L. REV. 1, 9 (1996). 5 BEALE at §1:3, 1-13. 6 Kadish at 10. 7 BEALE at §1:3, 1-13. 8 Kadish at 10. 9 Id. at 12. Zenger was ultimately prosecuted by a bill of information, which only emboldened the American preference for grand juries. 1 the grand jury could act as a great defender of liberty. In 1791, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted and, with it, the right to a grand jury was created. Continued Use Across the Country After its inclusion in the Constitution, the right to a grand jury was uniformly provided by individual states as well.10 By the mid-1800s, however, this consensus was quickly eroding. Contending that the grand jury had outlived its purpose and that its investigatory powers were infringing on personal liberties, multiple states removed the right to a grand jury from their constitutions.11 Around this same time, six newly admitted states declined to utilize the grand jury. Mostly western and sparsely populated, these states contended that the grand jury was too cumbersome and inefficient for their needs.12
  
  https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Boards/grandJury/Materials/2016/F...
- ilona Trommler > Jea9 November 8, 2026 at 4:11pm
  
  I guess we need people who are true Americans, brilliant, though, determined, focused, who simple will not settle for anything less than winning the country back.
- Jea9 > ilona Trommler November 8, 2026 at 4:37pm
  
  There is zero, absolutely zero reason that this couldn't start in every small-town USA if they knew about it. My Grandpa would have done this is a heartbeat. So would have my uncles, my Dad and my Mom.
  
  Imagine if this were part of a 3rd party platform and backed up by Constitutional Sheriffs who verified interposition and nullification. All these creeps would have been Gitmo'd or elsewhere by now.
  
  It comes down to--how do we destroy the corporate hold or leash that controls us?
  
  Here is what else is not known.
  
  The original definition of "peers," as in a "jury of one's peers," is those "randomly drawn from a fair cross section of the local community," as In neighbors. Webster"s 1828 dictionary. The one that should be used whenever possible.
  
  This coincides with what my Mother said, as one of the 1st Federal professional female employees back in the early 50's. She said gov would send someone to "interview" neighbors before hiring for a position. I think they may have done that with her or she wouldn't have known that.
  
  Ironically, Trump is reviving doing this for citizenship applicants. Did they do this when you came applied for citizenship? Do you know?
  
  How contorted they have made Truth. More preferences for judges and less and less for the common folk, who are the only ones beholden to no one. We do not serve money-masters. But the 'elites' sure do.

This reply was deleted.