Forum

neo-liberal CBS’s own data tells a different story. According to the survey, 80% of Black Americans and 77% of Hispanics support requiring a valid photo ID to vote. Not exactly a divided country. It gets better. Among both groups, more than twice as many respondents said voter ID requirements would make them more likely to vote than less likely. So the policy described as suppressive appears, in the polling, to encourage participation.

Now here’s the interesting part. left-wing CBS published a write-up on its own poll. The question about whether voter ID would increase turnout did NOT make the article. Shocker. It is available in the full dataset for anyone motivated enough to go looking. No headline. No segment. No discussion. An understandable oversight, apparently!!!

Support for proof of citizenship follows the same pattern. Majorities of Black and Hispanic respondents favor requiring documentation to register to vote. Both groups are also more likely than Democrats overall to view ineligible voting as a problem. None of which fits especially well with the neo-liberal  narrative. Which explains the editing choices.

Perhaps the left-wing’s greatest contribution to public discourse is to threaten anyone who disagrees with them with financial ruin, slander, embarrassment, condemnation, homelessness and prison -- and then announce the existence of a “consensus.” Their signature consensus-by-threat technique has been used to prove the truth of global warming, Russian interference with the 2016 election, COVID-19 lockdowns, hunter’s laptop as Russian disinformation, and -- especially important today -- the nonexistence of voter fraud. Dissenters from the neo-liberal position on all these issues are slyly compared to Holocaust conspiracy theorists by calling them “deniers” -- “climate deniers,” “COVID deniers,” “mask deniers,” “global warming deniers,” “science deniers,” and “election deniers.” Until very, very recently, “denier” was a word that referred exclusively to Holocaust deniers.

Although I’m sure it’s fun, browbeating people into a terrified, cowering silence isn’t proof of anything. In fact, it kind of suggests beliefs of such dainty substance that raising the slightest objection could make the whole thing fall apart. Ask Soviet scientists who were sent to the gulag for refusing to renounce Lysenkoism about it. Oh, you can’t. They’re dead.

But let's examine the left-wing's “consensus” on the question of voter fraud. With the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) under debate -- which would merely require proof of citizenship to vote -- we’re getting a lot of categorical, sweeping statements for which there can be no proof, such as: “the 2020 election was the most secure in U.S. history!”17 intellligence agencies agree! Wait - no, that was about putin hacking the 2016 election to elect Trump.

To the extent liberals bother trying to marshal any proof that voter fraud doesn’t exist, their evidence is:
1) Promiscuous use of words like “without evidence,” “misinformation,” “conspiracy theory,” “lies,” and “you’re more likely to be struck by lightning.” (All those are from a singleneo-liberal ny times article on voter fraud.)
2) Name-calling -- extremely effective among kindergarteners and ny times readers; and
3) Citing the rarity of voter fraud convictions.

The entire left-wing media Blabosphere: THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS VOTER FRAUD! Bu can we look? The entire left-wing media Blabosphere: ARE YOU A DENIER? THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS VOTER FRAUD!

Thus, a ny times opinion piece proved that voter fraud is a “myth” by citing the book “The Myth of Voter Fraud.” The book noted that, in 2005, there were more prosecutions for migratory bird law violations than voter fraud. (Perhaps neo-liberals wouldn’t be so glib about migratory bird prosecutions if they knew that 90% of the cases are brought against oil companies.)

Unaware of the “No Convictions, No Crimes” as proof? Now you know about it. And I can prove that there were no lynchings in the Old South from 1877 to 1950 since convictions for lynchings were vanishingly rare and punishment rarer. But even the klan didn’t block prosecutions like neo-liberals do. The estimated 1% conviction rate for lynchings is still higher than the 0.04% of convictions for voter fraud that neo-liberals tout to prove the nonexistence of voter fraud. Remember back in 2006 and 2007 when President Bush fired 8 US attorneys for not investigating voter fraud, and all hell broke loose? About a decade earlier, in an unprecedented act, b.j. clinton had fired all 93.

Extract the facts. Abstract the lesson. Get the point?
 

Supplemental Info: 
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1H46xjKNNA/ 

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1G4pUMFqXY/ 

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1bbGvj7VvQ/ 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/03/24/victor-davis-hanson-the-new-democratic-party/ 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/03/why_are_the_cities_blue.html 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/03/25/democrats-continue-holding-american-air-travelers-hostage-to-save-illegal-aliens/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=democrats-continue-holding-american-air-travelers-hostage-to-save-illegal-aliens&utm_term=2026-03-25 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5798964-afge-president-slams-shutdown/ 

https://spectator.org/another-isolated-incident-right-on-schedule/ 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/minnesota-millionaire-who-qualified-for-food-stamps-warns-of-fraud-by-design-loophole-ahead-of-hearing 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/03/24/watch-margot-cleveland-breaks-down-5-ways-jack-smiths-witch-hunt-ripped-up-the-constitution/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=watch-margot-cleveland-breaks-down-5-ways-jack-smiths-witch-hunt-ripped-up-the-constitution&utm_term=2026-03-25