🚨
— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) May 22, 2025
Major Supreme Court win for President Trump and the American people.
“Because the Constitution vests the executive power in the President, see Art. II, §1, cl. 1, he may remove without cause executive officers who exercise that power on his behalf, subject to narrow… pic.twitter.com/aNmlp2ur0P
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
SCOTUS GAVE NOTHING TO THE PRESIDENT... that he did not already have by Constitutional Law... The SCOTUS doesn't have JUDICIAL REVIEW over the powers and authority granted to the Executive Branch by the Constitution.Â
The President doesn't need the Federal Courts' permission to remove appointed members of the Executive Branch.  Any alleged Constitutional violations by the Executive are to be addressed by Congress using the IMPEACHMENT PROCESS or an Election.
YES, it's a "Major Supreme Court win."
End. Not for Trump and not for the people, it's NOT.Â
THEY ARE NOT OVER POTUS. They are feeding their own delusions and still getting away with it. IT MATTERS HOW WE WIN.
The SCOTUS PRESUMES TO MUCH... too, act as if the President needs their permission (agreement to remove appointed members of the Administration without their tacit permission. The Constitution does not give the SCOTUS legal review over a President's managment of the Executive Branch's personnel.
A President doesn't need the Federal Court's permission or legal findings to revoke a Presidential appointment... 'COMMISSION' to federal office. Federal Unions have no Constitutional standing in the management of the Federal Government or its employees ... Hence, no standing in Constitutional law... Thus, no case to be heard by the court.
Trump should ignore the Court's unconstitutional interference with his managment of the Executive Departments' personnel... The Union should be barred from representing federal employees as it has no soverign interests or Constitutional standing in the government of the United States...
Do we know what this was about, what this ruling is referring to specifically?
"Chief Justice John Roberts paused a lower-court order that would have required the Trump administration to release over $1.5 billion to aid organizations for work that was approved by Congress."
Take a look at some other demo bs.
"SCOTUS Hands Trump His First Legal Victory of Second Term"
Note: "Judge ALLOWS Trump to...."
And of course, this bs site is named, "Democracydocket.com" Where exactly is that word in our founding documents?Â
and then there's this:
"The stay came just hours after Washington D.C. District Court Judge Amir Ali issued an order requiring the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Department of State to unfreeze funds to AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Journalism Development Network by before midnight Wednesday.
Sure sounds like rulership via COURTS is expanding.Â
"the administration failed to comply with his previous restraining order."
"Judge Rules Trump Officials Must Testify in DOGE Data Lawsuit"
If I had any sayso, I would ...throw their rears in GITMO. Usurpation of the Office of President of the United States. It is the same as a coup e' tat.Â
Rightly so... it appears that a significant number of federal judges have conspired to conduct an internal insurgency to govern America by judicial fiat...Â
Exactly Jea9... Under Article 2, Section 1 and 3, the President has the power to appoint all the Unelected Officers of the Federal Government by Presidential Commission/Appointment.Â
He may remove any 'Presidential Commission' AT WILL... Ending the appointment and terminating any federal officer except those OFFICERS exempted by the Constitution (Inferior Federal Judges are not specifically exempted from such termination. Congress and the Courts may not interfere with this Presidential power. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to change this power...not a court order or act of Congress.
Pres. Trump can use this power to remove inferior federal court justices... by revoking their 'Commissions' as Judges. Just do it... Cite the Constitution and refuse to obey illegal, unconstitutional court orders or findings.
The SCOTUS has no jurisdiction to amend, redefine, or apply Judicial review that challenges the Constitutional powers granted to the President... Challenges to the Constitutional powers and functions rest with Congress, the several States, using the AMENDMENT process.
The Judicial Branch has overstepped its jurisdiction when it attempts to dictate limits and or changes to the historic assignment of Constitutional powers. Doing so should result in IMPEACHMENT Of the Justices who support such unconstitutional review by the courts.
The aroma of tyrannical power must be quite addictive. This is what happens when murder, mayhem and evil have been allowed to run rampant for over 30 years. Even animals have a pack order. Too bad humans don't. At least our black-robed fools don't. Where's Putin. He could take care of this.