Replies

  • Some discussions downloaded to we patriots are worthy to one degree or another. or another of our time and/or attention.  But, why do the Tea Party powers at times download these lesser "discussions" to us.  This topic is a "no-brainer."  I will not share my thoughts on this present topic because my thoughts are obvious   There are other discussions/topics far more worthy of our attention that provided by "common" patriots that you will never put before our eyes.  That is CENSORSHIP.  I, myself, years ago, felt the sting of your censorship.  Your defense is that you keep them "on file" and we can go to the "Other Discussions" file and read them there if we so choose.  No, your thoughts are regularly placed before our eyes.  It seems to me that we do not need to "Go and Fetch" for your topics.  But we must for others.  Either place all discussions up front or toss all discussions into one location where we dogs can go and fetch.  I know you place some discussions of others before us in a poor attempt to 'balance the budget," but the vast majority seem to be from the powers.  Why is it that we need your approval instead of directly posting our discussion articles?  This perceived attitude is caused by all of you, not by anyone else.  I am confident there are others who thoughts are similar if not exactly the same.  

  • YES, ABSOLUTELY!    WHY HAVE WE NOT DONE IT YEARS AGO?   THEY CERTAINLY DO NOT BRING US ANYTHING WE NEED! 

  • "Should we ban muslims- - "??  We already DID THAT with the immigration act of 1952; everyone seemed to forget that, while the Indonesian fraud was squatting in the Oval Office, wit his size 13s parked on the Resolute desktop!

     

  • It is up to the intelligent and aware to protect the sheep from the wolves.

    The how seems an impossible task, considering the stupidy of the sheep, who would sacrifice everything we value in this nation.

    By willful ignorance that leads to complicity.

    • Thumbs up to that.

  • Hell yes. Muslims have a continent. Why have them mess up ours. 

  • Let’s just not jump into conclusion, there are a good person in the Muslim community the problem is the ones that has radicalizes and these are the one that create the problem. They believe all communist nonsense and it is mixed with the religion.  Is like saying that because Colombia export cocaine, we going to ban all Colombians so that no cocaine gets into the USA. It is totally absurd of trying to do that. 

    • Your comment is absurd! It is impossible to be a good Muslim! Any Muslim who is following the Koran is a Muslim who is for the destruction of all else. Muslims who do not follow the Koran aren't good Muslims, as a Catholic who doesn't follow catholic doctrine isn't a good catholic. The problem with the Muslims who do not follow the Koran is that they will not say so! They aren't good Muslims, but cannot be good Americans either because they refuse to choose sides. YES, this is a situation where one MUST take a side! Islam and Islamic law do not work with our constitutional laws. This is a bad match all the way around, Muslims need to stay with their own in the countries they have lived in for their existence, europe, america are Christian lands and we don't need the constant violence from islamists. Their religious and their legal laws are the same....neither works in America. 

    • Those muslims who are not (supposedly) radicalized are just as bad, because they do NOT oppose, or attempt to stop the actions of those radical "terrorists"!!

This reply was deleted.