Source;
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a challenge filed by an Arizona resident who had sought to prove claims of election fraud during the Nov. 3 election in her state.
The nine justices, without comment, dismissed (pdf) a request by Pinal County resident Staci Burk to find evidence of election fraud. Burk had sought access to ballots to prove that some were invalid or fraudulent.
Earlier this year, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a ruling that agreed with a trial court judge in Pinal County that Burk lacked the right to contest the election. The reason given was that she wasn’t a registered voter at the time she filed her lawsuit, as required in state election contests. Both courts also agreed that she made her legal challenge too late, after the five-day period for filing such an action had passed.
Burk said in her lawsuit that she was a qualified Arizona voter, but officials said they discovered she wasn’t registered to vote. She later said she mistakenly thought “qualified electors” were people who were merely eligible to vote, and that her voter registration was canceled because election workers were unable to verify her address.
“There is nothing before the Court to indicate that Appellant timely contacted the appropriate authorities to correct any problems with her voter registration,” Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Brutinel wrote. “An election challenge … is not the proper vehicle to reinstate voter registration.”
Brutinel also said that Burk had admitted “that she was well aware before the election that she would not be able to vote in the general election … There is nothing before the court to indicate that [Burk] timely contacted the appropriate authorities to correct any problems with her voter registration.”
In her petition to the Supreme Court, Burk wanted a hearing over the question about whether she was an “elector.”
Meanwhile, an audit ordered by the Arizona state Senate of nearly 2.1 million Maricopa County, Arizona, ballots could last for weeks, according to former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, the Senate audit liaison.
Bennett said over the weekend that there is “no deadline” and added that the Senate has been granted permission to the state fairgrounds “for as long as we need it.”
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court threw out a slew of election-related lawsuits, including former President Donald Trump’s last remaining challenge.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The case is 20-1243 Burk, Staci V. Ducey, Gov. of Az, et al.
MY OPINION ON THIS!
I believe our Government and I mean all three branches are irrevocably compromised. We need to use the section of the Constitution our Founders wisely placed in it in anticipation of what's happening to America today. Our founders knew eventially our government would grow and become corrupt. so to avoid the bloodbath that would come with another Revolution they created a way to have a bloodless revolution the npeople themselves could initiate. That creation is article-V of the Constitution.
We the People have the right to reform our Government, and we don't even have to change one word of the Constitution or Bill of Rights. Every amendment coming after the bill of rights was originated by Congress. Knowing Congress and the results of those amendments, you can see they were all to increase the power of Elites and Central Federal Government. It's time for the people to take back the stolen power from the government. We can do that by demanding our State Legislatures petition Congress for an Article-V amendment proposal convention. Congress must by Constitutional Law convene one then step mback and allow the people to make the proposals the congress would never make on their own.
The people could impose a term limit of 12 years of Congressional service.
They could decree a balanced budget be the first priority of every new congress and forbid any other legislation to be proposed until the Balanced budget was completed and enacted.
They could propose amendments to undo all the other infringements Congress has made in favor of themselves at the expense of the people.
They could repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments so America could go back to apportioned taxation and place the Senators back under their States control instead of their party.
They could amend the 14th to remove the toxic section "No State Shall" which flipped the Constitution from chains on the Federal Government to chains on the States and People.
They could bolster the 2nd Amenmdment to forbid confiscation of firearms and make it necessary for the people to affirm ANY Law, Rule, or Regulation by a 3/4 vote by the American Citizens for it to be made or continue to be. Of course the existing ones will need to be reviewed and allowed or rejected by the public.
They could even create an Amendment where the American Public would have the Legal Means to overturn any Law, Regulation, or Supreme Court Ruling, by a 7/8 vote by the american Public.
They could even create an Amendment that a;llowed the American Public to recall any elected official by a 3/4 vote and any appointed official by a 7/8 vote.
THIS IS HOW WE TAKE BACK OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR LEGITIMATE POWER VESTED IN US BY THE CONSTITUTION!
The Tradesman
Replies
As soon as we can regain control of the Executive and Congressional Branches we need to IMPEACH MOST OF THE SITTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES... a clear and resounding message must be sent that we no longer will tolerate JUDGES that have a problem READING ENGLISH and the simple language of the US Constitution. We must... must impeach the bulk of sitting justices in the Federal Courts...
We must also rewrite the 'federal judiciary act'... to restrict the judgments and orders of any federal court to apply only to the case in law before it. No more rule by judicial fiat and the unconstitutional doctrine of 'Stare Desisis'. Judges must not be permitted to rewrite law thru judicial dicta... judgments. If they find a law unconstitutional refer it to Congress and let Congress decide if they agree by repealing the law or reforming those portions of the law found unconstitutional. Let Congress be the final arbiter of the laws they write not... some individual judge or a compromised and corrupt SCOTUS.
I am sorry to say but Pres. Trump's judicial appointments have turned out to be horrible... we probably have more than 300 new justices that frankly need immediate recall. It appears he relied on others to recommend these justices ... men like McConnel... and other RINOs. I just keep finding more and more questionable appointments and what appears to be misguided management of key personnel in the former Administration. It begs the question of who was in charge of making all those questionable recommendations for appointments and retention.. Sessions, Barr, Kelly, Esper, Mattis, Comey, Wray, Rosenstein, Priebus, and many others.