The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by Washington, D.C., residents over their lack of voting rights in Congress.
The justices’ move affirmed a lower court ruling that held that D.C. residents are not entitled to voting representation in the U.S. House.
In a brief unsigned order Monday, the justices indicated their ruling was based on a Supreme Court decision from more than two decades ago that found that Washingtonians do not have a constitutional right to a vote in Congress.
Two of the court’s more conservatives justices — Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — indicated they would have dismissed the appeal based on their view that the court lacked jurisdiction over the dispute.
D.C. has a delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), who is not authorized to vote on legislation on the House floor.
She told The Hill in a statement that she is “deeply disappointed” by the court’s decision, but argued that the ruling “has no bearing on D.C.
read more here: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/575160-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-dispute-over-dc-representation-in?rl=1
Replies
Excellent decision. D.C. is not a state - they should not have representation Actually I don't believe anyone should live in D.C.
I am surprised the Progressive Socialists have not worked the clenched fist into the logo.
It is their fascist graphic style. Beware!
Even for the folks my family tree traces to.
It is really all the same inspired evil.
There's a real easy fix here. All the residential areas of DC north of the River, cede back to Maryland. Limit the District to only the governmental properties. Problem solved.
That works.
Excellent.
Lynn Bryant DeSpain