“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a ruling in Texas’ lawsuit challenging election procedures in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The lawsuit divided the nation, with roughly half the states supporting and opposing the lawsuit, respectively.
The Court just denied Texas’ request to file a Bill of Complaint. Justices Alito and Thomas would have granted it, but denied any additional relief.
Here’s the Order:
155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
read more: https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/u-s-supreme-court-denies-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/
Replies
Not to mention Kennedy. Even Nixon knew that he and his daddy stole the 1960 Presidential election, but Nixon refused to put the country through what is being done to us now. Those demoncrats never stop.
I see it differently. The SC chose to scrutinize the merits of the case by judging whether Texas had any "standing" to even bring the case. The SC decided that Texas was not personally hurt by the actions of these other States, therefore cannot have a case against them. But ... is that true? If the actions (allowed fraud) to decide the outcome of an election were allowed to stand, would not Texas (being one of the U.S. 50 States be hurt? Texas would have to abide by the decisions of a fraudulent President. It's not as if the fraud allowing of Biden to become President would not have consequences for Texas ... it would have terrible consequences ... as for all the States.
Yet the Judges (probably led by Roberts) decided to look into and "try" to form an opinion based not on the case's merits at all, but on "possible" side issues. In my view, if 250 Million people are convinced of fraud, the court shouldn't be looking for ways to side-step their responsibility, but for any reason at all to take the case. And the other Judges just fell into line and had to admit that along this one sliver of reasoning, Texas doesn't appear to have a case. They could just as easily have said that every U.S. State DOES have a case. And it appears that over 20 Attorney Generals claim that very same thing, that their State has a case also.
We can't trust the Supreme Court anymore. Is that surprising? After wonderful decisions like Roe vs Wade, which wound up destroying over 60 million lives, does ANYONE think that the court is infallible How about denying our written founding documents that state that the United States was founded on biblical principles, and subsequently taking prayer out of schools.
The people of TEXAS plus the other states WERE HURT by this fraud of an election. even an IDIOT can see that, so you know how far below IDIOTS the SC is.
Give me a break, Texas has no STANDING... How can Texas, a member of a Constitutional Republic consisting of 50 States, not have standing to challenge the election of the President of that Republic? Not only does Texas have a common interest and stake in the election of the President, they are also impacted by the election of all members to the Federal Government. The actions of Federal Officers in a Republic not only impact the State they are elected to represent, their actions in governing will directly impact the commerce, wealth, taxes, security and safety, of every other State in the Republic... including Texas.
There is only ONE PRESIDENT for our Constitutional Republic chosen by the electorate of the Republic... each member State has a direct interest in who becomes President. Each State has a vested interest in knowing that the other members of the Republic hold fair and open elections, which honor the ONE VOTE for ONE MAN principal in electing our President. States that permit non-Citizens, the Dead, underage voters, felons, multiple-registrations for one voter, or compromise the security of ballots and or use illicit means to tabulate their votes violate the rights to a fair and open election by every other state and its citizens. The voters in Texas have a vested interest in how the other states conduct their election to any office in the Federal Government, due to their common interest in how those elected to the Federal Government will impact the policies and laws which regulate much of their life.
If the several states including Texas are not 'affected' why are millions of dollars donated to the campaigns for federal office in states other than one's resident state? Why do some individuals risk arrest, to illegally vote in another state's elections, if there is no correlating benefit to do so? The SCOTUS not only shirked their duty by refusing to take the Texas case they demonstrated a contempt for the citizens of Texas and those states who joined the lawsuit. The SCOTUS has demonstrated it is no longer worthy of passing JUDGMENT IN ANY CASE brought before it. They have no integrity and honor. America has no Supreme Court only the shell of an inferior system of justice. America's Supreme Court is compromised it has become the harbor for a corrupt judiciary, a judicial bench with no moral backbone.
So what are we left with:
Hopes of an Electoral upset.
Instituted Martial law in State of Emergency.
The ultimate resolution of conflict, Civil War?
Ain't we up to our eyeballs in it?
YES!
I say we show Washington DC how pissed off we are!
that was when Joe Biden and Obama was in office.
They weren't "in office," because soetoro is a foreign national, and the incredibly cowardly RINOS probably knew it. Therefore, both offices were vacant for eight miserable years through demoncrat fraud, and the more they get away with, the more and more insidious they will become. God help us.
So much for "orignalist" Justices. I am sickened by this turn of events. It seems to me that in a case of federal impact as selecting a president of these United States, all states impact each other and their voters. Perhaps we needs to think about making the presidential election a federal one and not a federalist one.
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
of 14 Next