My quick read found they:
~prohibited questioning illegal aliens about their status even in workplace raids
~Banned lethal force against people who are under the influence of narcotics and others:
(A) the types of less lethal force and deadly force that are prohibited under paragraphs (2) and (3); and
(B) how a Federal law enforcement officer can—
(i) assess whether the use of force is appropriate and necessary; and
(II) children and youth under 21 years of age;
(III) elderly persons;
(IV) persons with mental, behavioral, or physical disabilities or impairments;
(V) persons experiencing perceptual or cognitive impairments due to use of alcohol, narcotics, hallucinogens, or other drugs;
(VI) persons suffering from a serious medical condition; and
(VII) persons with limited English proficiency.
~Funnel a ton of money to their pet community organizing groups as grants and consultant
~Tossed in lynching which hasn't been reported in the USA since.....1981, but it makes a good place to complain and call people names:
SEC. 402. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) The crime of lynching succeeded slavery as the ultimate expression of racism in the United States following Reconstruction.
(2) Lynching was a widely acknowledged practice in the United States until the middle of the 20th century.
(3) Lynching was a crime that occurred throughout the United States, with documented incidents in all but 4 States.
(4) At least 4,742 people, predominantly African Americans, were reported lynched in the United States between 1882 and 1968.
(5) Ninety-nine percent of all perpetrators of lynching escaped from punishment by State or local officials.
(6) Lynching prompted African Americans to form the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (referred to in this section as the “NAACP”) and prompted members of B'nai B'rith to found the Anti-Defamation League.
(7) Mr. Walter White, as a member of the NAACP and later as the executive secretary of the NAACP from 1931 to 1955, meticulously investigated lynchings in the United States and worked tirelessly to end segregation and racialized terror.
(8) Nearly 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in Congress during the first half of the 20th century.
(9) Between 1890 and 1952, 7 Presidents petitioned Congress to end lynching.
(10) Between 1920 and 1940, the House of Representatives passed 3 strong anti-lynching measures.
(11) Protection against lynching was the minimum and most basic of Federal responsibilities, and the Senate considered but failed to enact anti-lynching legislation despite repeated requests by civil rights groups, Presidents, and the House of Representatives to do so.
(12) The publication of “Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America” helped bring greater awareness and proper recognition of the victims of lynching.
(13) Only by coming to terms with history can the United States effectively champion human rights abroad.
(14) An apology offered in the spirit of true repentance moves the United States toward reconciliation and may become central to a new understanding, on which improved racial relations can be forged.
(15) Having concluded that a reckoning with our own history is the only way the country can effectively champion human rights abroad, 90 Members of the United States Senate agreed to Senate Resolution 39, 109th Congress, on June 13, 2005, to apologize to the victims of lynching and the descendants of those victims for the failure of the Senate to enact anti-lynching legislation.
(16) The National Memorial for Peace and Justice, which opened to the public in Montgomery, Alabama, on April 26, 2018, is the Nation’s first memorial dedicated to the legacy of enslaved Black people, people terrorized by lynching, African Americans humiliated by racial segregation and Jim Crow, and people of color burdened with contemporary presumptions of guilt and police violence.
(17) Notwithstanding the Senate’s apology and the heightened awareness and education about the Nation’s legacy with lynching, it is wholly necessary and appropriate for the Congress to enact legislation, after 100 years of unsuccessful legislative efforts, finally to make lynching a Federal crime.
(18) Further, it is the sense of Congress that criminal action by a group increases the likelihood that the criminal object of that group will be successfully attained and decreases the probability that the individuals involved will depart from their path of criminality. Therefore, it is appropriate to specify criminal penalties for the crime of lynching, or any attempt or conspiracy to commit lynching.
(19) The United States Senate agreed to unanimously Senate Resolution 118, 115th Congress, on April 5, 2017, “[c]ondemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States” and taking notice specifically of Federal Bureau of Investigation statistics demonstrating that “among single-bias hate crime incidents in the United States, 59.2 percent of victims were targeted due to racial, ethnic, or ancestral bias, and among those victims, 52.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by the offenders’ anti-Black or anti-African American bias”.
(20) On September 14, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed into law Senate Joint Resolution 49 (Public Law 115–58; 131 Stat. 1149), wherein Congress “condemn[ed] the racist violence and domestic terrorist attack that took place between August 11 and August 12, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia” and “urg[ed] the President and his administration to speak out against hate groups that espouse racism, extremism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and White supremacy; and use all resources available to the President and the President’s Cabinet to address the growing prevalence of those hate groups in the United States”.
(21) Senate Joint Resolution 49 (Public Law 115–58; 131 Stat. 1149) specifically took notice of “hundreds of torch-bearing White nationalists, White supremacists, Klansmen, and neo-Nazis [who] chanted racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-immigrant slogans and violently engaged with counter-demonstrators on and around the grounds of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville” and that these groups “reportedly are organizing similar events in other cities in the United States and communities everywhere are concerned about the growing and open display of hate and violence being perpetrated by those groups”.
(22) Lynching was a pernicious and pervasive tool that was used to interfere with multiple aspects of life—including the exercise of federally protected rights, as enumerated in section 245 of title 18, United States Code, housing rights, as enumerated in section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631), and the free exercise of religion, as enumerated in section 247 of title 18, United States Code. Interference with these rights was often effectuated by multiple offenders and groups, rather than isolated individuals. Therefore, prohibiting conspiracies to violate each of these rights recognizes the history of lynching in the United States and serves to prohibit its use in the future.
SEC. 403. LYNCHING. (a) Offense.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “§ 250. Lynching “Whoever conspires with another person to violate section 245, 247, or 249 of this title or section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) shall be punished in the same manner as a completed violation of such section, except that if the maximum term of imprisonment for such completed violation is less than 10 years, the person may be imprisoned for not more than 10 years.”.
So, basically the House (who is still on vacation) wasted their vacation time on a bill that will be dead on arrival in the Senate. Can we stop paying their salaries now? This is getting ridiculous!
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definitions.
Sec. 101. Deprivation of rights under color of law.
Sec. 102. Qualified immunity reform.
Sec. 103. Pattern and practice investigations.
Sec. 104. Independent investigations.
Sec. 111. Short title.
Sec. 112. Definitions.
Sec. 113. Accreditation of law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 114. Law enforcement grants.
Sec. 115. Attorney General to conduct study.
Sec. 116. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 117. National task force on law enforcement oversight.
Sec. 118. Federal data collection on law enforcement practices.
Sec. 201. Establishment of National Police Misconduct Registry.
Sec. 202. Certification requirements for hiring of law enforcement officers.
Sec. 221. Short title.
Sec. 222. Definitions.
Sec. 223. Use of force reporting.
Sec. 224. Use of force data reporting.
Sec. 225. Compliance with reporting requirements.
Sec. 226. Federal law enforcement reporting.
Sec. 227. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 301. Short title.
Sec. 302. Definitions.
Sec. 311. Prohibition.
Sec. 312. Enforcement.
Sec. 321. Policies to eliminate racial profiling.
Sec. 331. Policies required for grants.
Sec. 332. Involvement of Attorney General.
Sec. 333. Data collection demonstration project.
Sec. 334. Development of best practices.
Sec. 335. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 341. Attorney General to issue regulations.
Sec. 342. Publication of data.
Sec. 343. Limitations on publication of data.
Sec. 351. Attorney General to issue regulations and reports.
Sec. 361. Training on racial bias and duty to intervene.
Sec. 362. Ban on no-knock warrants in drug cases.
Sec. 363. Incentivizing banning of chokeholds and carotid holds.
Sec. 364. PEACE Act.
Sec. 365. Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act.
Sec. 366. Best practices for local law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 371. Short title.
Sec. 372. Requirements for Federal uniformed officers regarding the use of body cameras.
Sec. 373. Patrol vehicles with in-car video recording cameras.
Sec. 374. Facial recognition technology.
Sec. 375. GAO study.
Sec. 376. Regulations.
Sec. 377. Rule of construction.
Sec. 381. Short title.
Sec. 382. Law enforcement body-worn camera requirements.
Sec. 401. Short title.
Sec. 402. Findings.
Sec. 403. Lynching.
Replies
And we thought these communists couldn't get any more crazy. We the people want a strong police that can take care of terrorist thugs demonstrating and looting in our streets.
ONE LAST CHANCE IS TO VOTE IN 2020 AND IT MATTERS. ONE THING I AGREED W/OBAMA ON IS THAT ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES AND BOY ARE WE SEEING IT. THE BLUE STATE GOV AND MAYORS; THE SCHOOLS WE NEED TO HELP NOW TEACH OUR KIDS OURSELVES FOR WHAT THEY ARE TAUGHT NOW HAS NOTHING TO DO W/AMERICA OR OUR HISTORY WHICH IS BTW BEING TORN APART.
TIME TO RE-ELECT TRUMP AND GET RID OF ALL DEMS AND RINOS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE IF WE DON'T THEN FIND A MIRROR FOR THE PERSON TO BLAME WILL BE YOU.
THE DISGUSTING WAY OUR GOVERNMENT IS BEING RUN NOW BY PILLHEAD AND HER ICE CREAM AND SCHUMER ARE A DESPICABLE DISGRACE AND THAT HAS TO CHANGE. IT IS UP TO US NOW.
THE GOVT HAS TO SHRINK NOT GROW AND BLM HAS TO BE STOPPED.
Giving monies to community organizers is nothing more than money laundering, the larger percentage will go back to newsom, deblasio and the rest of the corrupt bunch ( do you really think the everyday Americans donates to these pukes? The only way they can win elections is through fraud, and the money they siphon off of their so called pacs) along with his 125 million he is suposedly trying to give illegals. How many billions of those dollars obama had printed for Iran came back into his account? How about Ukraine? Not to mention uranium 1.
(5) Ninety-nine percent of all perpetrators of lynching escaped from punishment by State or local officials? These perpetrators were Democrats.
If this law passes look for the police to withdraw from most forms of contact policing... patroling, routine traffic stops anything where they have to engage in contact with potential criminals... it will simply be too risky from personal injury and liability aspect. Every Tom, Dick, and Harry felon will carry a digital camera and the phone number for the nearest ACLU lawyer. Why would anyone place themselves in harm's way, give the advantage to those looking to harm them and subject themselves to a raft of potential lawsuits from individuals who have nothing to lose by filing a frivolous suit?
Not a chance!
Those damn communists are hell bent on totally destroying our country.
Yes, they certainly are!