ADMIN

Why the IRS Must Investigate the Tax-Exempt Syndicate that Weaponized Mamdani’s Campaign

Days after winning, Zohran Mamdani told NBC: "I don't think we should have billionaires"
Our investigation reveals his 'grassroots revolution' was actually backed by a $2+ billion tax-exempt syndicate raising serious IRS compliance questions.

Mamdani is merely a product of this syndicate—the coordinated infrastructure that manufactured his political rise operates continuously, creating candidates while maintaining the illusion of grassroots democracy.

Full investigation, with receipts (35m Read):
➡️https://whitecollarfraud.com/2025/08/17/why-the-irs-must-investigate-the-tax-exempt-syndicate-that-weaponized-mamdanis-campaign/

THE FORENSIC ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK:
🔴 SUBSTANCE OVER FORM DOCTRINE: IRS examines operational reality, not just legal formalities
🔴 Professional auditors at Deloitte & Withum determined legally separate entities must be treated as UNIFIED OPERATIONS
🔴 When organizations share executives, payroll systems, office space - legal separation becomes fiction

🟠 CASH FUNGIBILITY PRINCIPLE: Money is interchangeable
🟠 Government grants create organizational capacity that enables political transfers
🟠 Even if organizations claim fund segregation, taxpayer money frees up other resources for politics

THE NETWORK EXAMINED:
🟢 Open Society network (Soros foundations) - $693+ million operation
🟢 Working Families Party entities - coordinated political operations
🟢 Tides Foundation network - $350+ million pass-through operation
🟢 Make the Road organizations - $16.1 million in taxpayer grants flowing to political arms

THE OPERATIONAL REALITY:
🟡 $2+ BILLION network with SAME executives controlling "separate" organizations
🟡 Organizations acknowledge "common control" with political groups in their own IRS filings
🟡 Shared addresses, personnel, and payroll systems across supposed independents
🟡 Professional auditors identified "significant deficiencies" in federal fund controls
🟡 $36.4 million in transfers between "charitable" and political operations

THE COMPLIANCE QUESTIONS THIS RAISES:
🔵 Potential IRC Section 501(c)(3) violations: Political intervention by tax-exempt organizations
🔵 Potential IRC Section 4955 issues: Excise taxes on political expenditures
🔵 Potential IRC Section 4958 issues: Excess compensation across related entities
🔵 Form 990 reporting accuracy questions about organizational independence

THE TAX IMPLICATIONS:
🟣 $450+ million in potential annual tax impact
🟣 Questions about donor deductions for activities supporting political operations
🟣Investment income tax treatment under potentially improper exempt status
🟣 Corporate income tax questions on $5.57 billion in assets

IRS WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT FILED documenting these compliance patterns

When operational reality contradicts legal formalities, substance over form analysis reveals the true tax compliance picture.

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • WOW! What a catch!

This reply was deleted.