Forum

The Justice here doesn't appear to know who called the Special Session that resulted in the proposed amendment, which is concerning.

But appellee's counsel argues, excellently, that an amendment requires only a 1/3 + 1 vote to block the special session. But since the special… pic.twitter.com/XvjHn0Kss1

— CannCon (@canncon) April 28, 2026

The Justice here doesn't appear to know who called the Special Session that resulted in the proposed amendment, which is concerning.

But appellee's counsel argues, excellently, that an amendment requires only a 1/3 + 1 vote to block the special session. But since the special session was proposed to deal with a budget issue, it was not shut down.

Once in that special session, they chose to propose an amendment to the Constitution, which only required a majority vote.

So they tricked them into a 2/3 vote for a Special Session to address a budget issue and then rope-a-doped into an amendment.

Insane.