ADMIN

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • VIVEK, GREAT POST!

  • From a Constitutional law professor at Yale.
     
     
  • Everything they do is a deflection for the indoctrinated. Lies upon more lies.

  • Something else we shouldn't fall for: If the Republican Party tries to put Vivek R up for VP, or even POTUS again.  Both of our major poitical parties doing all lthey can to obfuscate the constitutional error/crime here. 

    It's very simple - and both parties know it, based on their past actions.  To wit: One of the eligibility requirements for both of those federal offfices is that the occupant needs to be a 'natural born' citizen.  What is a nbc?  It is a person "born in the counry, of parents who are citizens" thereof.  The definition is from the definitive tome of the day of the constitutional Framers on such nation-building matters, E. de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations'.  (Book One, Ch. XIX, Sect. 212.  Look it up.)  And that eigibiity requirement for those two federal offices - and those two only; signifying their speclal nature in the eyes of the Framers (having to do with the fact that the occupant of the office of POTUS - to which that of the office of VP might accede - becomes as well, then, the Commander in Chief of the nation's military forces, and the Framers didn't want anybody occupying that position who had DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCESS.  Rather, only someone who had FULL ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.) - STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary. Thus, BHO occupied the office of POTUS illegally (which still needs to be rectified).   And K Harris currently occupies the office of VP illegally.  And neither Vivek R nor Nikki Haley were eligible as Repub candidates for the higher office this year.  And nor were Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, nor Rick Santorum, nor Bobby Jindal, in the Repub presidential primary of 2016. 

    And the proof that both poitical parties knew full well that they were attempting to skirt around the Constitution in this matter?  Because both of them, beteween 2003 and' 08 alone, tried a total of 8 times between them to get a constitutional amendment going through Congress on thisi ssue - the larger issue of eligibility in general, with this particular issue as their common denominator - and they failed each time even to get their proposals out of committee, such was the sensitivity around the eligibiiity issue.  So, what did they do?  It's obvious what they did. They colluded.   And they will both go down for it.

    Just as soon as the U.S. military honors their oath.  And brings this nation under Martial Law.  And starts a whole series of military tribunals, on this, and other such matters.  As the breaking of the rule of law of this nation - its Constitution.  As we learn a lesson the hard way.  That  either we live by the rule of law.  Or we will die by suicide.

    In the hands of the NWO crowd.  Who hve been scheming for this outcome for a very long time.                     

    • AGREE 100%!

    • Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think martial law can only be brought by the state, not the federal level.

    • Abstract
      When martial law is in effect, the military commander of an area or country has unlimited authority to make and enforce laws. Martial law is justified when civilian authority has ceased to function, is completely absent, or has become ineffective. Further, martial law suspends all existing laws, as well as civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose martial law. 
      Another source
       
      Second, and more specifically, the Posse Comitatus Act makes it illegal for federal military forces to participate in civilian law enforcement activities — the exact sort of activities that are associated with martial law — unless Congress has provided express authorization.
       
      we need to know
      Martial Law in Times of Civil Disorder | Office of Justice Programs
    • Jea, we the people desperately need President Donald J. Trump to be the commander-in-chief with "unlimited authority to make and enforce laws". This is the only way we can save our Republic, our freedom and liberties.

  • There in lies the problem, we have to deal with the Clinton's  Again.  Lord I would not wish that on anyone.  Not that she would get elected. I just don't want to have listen to that Witch, in any way shape or form. 

This reply was deleted.