Après toutes ces vagues d’immigration en Espagne, je vais vous expliquer par A + B pourquoi une partie de la gauche a structurellement besoin de flux continus d’arrivées irrégulières pour rester au pouvoir.
— Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael) August 1, 2026
A. Un immigrant qui vient d’arriver via le Maroc, interviewé dans la rue…
After all these waves of immigration in Spain, I’m going to explain to you by A + B why a part of the left structurally needs continuous flows of irregular arrivals to stay in power.
A. An immigrant who just arrived via Morocco, interviewed on the street by Nate Friedman, responds without beating around the bush: once he gets his papers, he’ll vote socialist his whole life. Not out of deep ideology. Out of simple rationality: the party that regularizes, that gives access to benefits, that talks “rights,” becomes the natural clientele.
B. Native voters, on the other hand, are starting to see the cost (housing, schools, security, cohesion).
AI is brutally accelerating this awareness. The emotional narratives that worked for 40-50 years (division, permanent victimization, “if you criticize, you’re mean”) are losing their power when everyone can cross-check the data in two clicks.
Mechanical result: the more people understand the deal, the more new loyal voters need to be imported to compensate for those who leave. It’s pure electoral arithmetic. We saw it in the United States despite Trump’s victory. We’re seeing it play out again in Europe.
This isn’t a question of “hatred of foreigners.” Most people who arrive react rationally to the incentives dangled in front of them. The real problem is the political idea that turns immigration into a permanent clientele machine rather than a demanding and selective integration process.
Bad ideas don’t just destroy societies. They end up first destroying those who carry them: trust erodes, polarization explodes, crises pile up.If the European peoples don’t regain control of this dynamic very quickly, we’re heading toward increasingly fragmented societies, low-trust, where the only glue left is clientelist redistribution.
History shows that this kind of trajectory rarely ends well.
But we’re not doomed. AI removes the pillars of opacity. X removes the narrative monopoly. Reversal is always possible.
The 21st century will belong to those who build high-trust societies, not to those who endlessly dilute social capital to save power.
It’s up to us to choose.
Replies