Little Bright Feather

Posted a couple Blogs I'm sick at what I discovered

If not for silly petty political games this would have prevented Hillary from being Sec of State and bar her attempt at office now because of the crap she has pulled at the Clinton Foundation

I am very conflicted by the discovery and the ramifications should they be verifiable, because the implications are profound. It also presents the members of the 1^st Congress in the traditional role of a politician instead of as a more virtuous noble character. It is not unusual when doing this type of research that you will stumble across other things unlooked for. This case is no exception, I discovered several exceptionally well researched sites claiming disturbing things relating to the 13^th amendment. There is overwhelming evidence that in 1819 the 13^th amendment as ratified as the Titles of Nobility Amendment. The evidence is compelling as it is reflected in the historic records of Colorado and Wyoming, Maine, The British Museum (particularly disturbing)and many other sources that in or around 1876 it was thrown away and replaced with what is represented as the 13^th amendment. Some evidence shows the currently accepted 13^th amendment as the TONA and the current 13^th amendment as the 14^th amendment. One shows the previously stated order with the 15^th amendment in agreement. There are many questions as to the legitimacy of the ratifications of the 16^th and 17^th amendment. The records of the states are in conflict

What is readily apparent is the respect and deference paid to the documents is not reflective of their actual treatment . The claim of Rule of Law is only that, there is no respect or belief that the people and government stand as equals before the law and they never have.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html#167-1

This link will take you to a site that raises issues with the 13^th, 14^th, 15^th, 16^th, and 17^th amendments. What becomes clear is Congress does not believe the amendment process is important. If an inconvenient conflict arises the Constitution stops being the supreme law of the land

The language of TONA which the call the original 13^th amendment bars Hillary Clinton from ever holding office and her time as Secretary of State was in violation of the law

As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendmentwas proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to further the causes and positions of"Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.

As noted in the discussion ⁶⁹ in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nob

Comments

Rhonda K Clark November 18, 2015 at 8:44am

God bless u angle
Tom Gallagher October 16, 2015 at 7:16pm

Posted a couple Blogs I'm sick at what I discovered

If not for silly petty political games this would have prevented Hillary from being Sec of State and bar her attempt at office now because of the crap she has pulled at the Clinton Foundation

I am very conflicted by the discovery and the ramifications should they be verifiable, because the implications are profound. It also presents the members of the 1^st Congress in the traditional role of a politician instead of as a more virtuous noble character. It is not unusual when doing this type of research that you will stumble across other things unlooked for. This case is no exception, I discovered several exceptionally well researched sites claiming disturbing things relating to the 13^th amendment. There is overwhelming evidence that in 1819 the 13^th amendment as ratified as the Titles of Nobility Amendment. The evidence is compelling as it is reflected in the historic records of Colorado and Wyoming, Maine, The British Museum (particularly disturbing)and many other sources that in or around 1876 it was thrown away and replaced with what is represented as the 13^th amendment. Some evidence shows the currently accepted 13^th amendment as the TONA and the current 13^th amendment as the 14^th amendment. One shows the previously stated order with the 15^th amendment in agreement. There are many questions as to the legitimacy of the ratifications of the 16^th and 17^th amendment. The records of the states are in conflict

What is readily apparent is the respect and deference paid to the documents is not reflective of their actual treatment . The claim of Rule of Law is only that, there is no respect or belief that the people and government stand as equals before the law and they never have.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html#167-1

This link will take you to a site that raises issues with the 13^th, 14^th, 15^th, 16^th, and 17^th amendments. What becomes clear is Congress does not believe the amendment process is important. If an inconvenient conflict arises the Constitution stops being the supreme law of the land

The language of TONA which the call the original 13^th amendment bars Hillary Clinton from ever holding office and her time as Secretary of State was in violation of the law

As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendmentwas proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to further the causes and positions of"Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.

As noted in the discussion ⁶⁹ in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nob
Robert Brown Jr MOD July 21, 2014 at 2:04pm

Welcome,

WE ARE GLAD YOU HAVE JOINED US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE BACK AMERICA!

Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your e-mail settings:

TEA PARTY Member Tips

TEA PARTY Navigation Tips

Help Desk E-Mail Settings

TEA PARTY Groups

If you need to Contact Congress then check out these links:

Contact Senate!

Social Site Contacts for the Senate!

House of Representatives!

Social Site Contacts for the House!

If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!

This reply was deleted.

Little Bright Feather

About

Comment Wall

Comments

Photos

Discussions

Note: this page contains paid content.

Blog Posts

Note: this page contains paid content.