Perry L. Brock vs The United States began as an action under The Contract Disputes Act but the constitutional violations of a DCMA Commander, former USN Capt Joe Manna, and his subordinates against me by discrimination and First Amendment violations to spoliate my contract claims and prima facie evidence made the cause of action constitutional instead of contract.

The Court of Federal Claims judge, Judge Bush, agreed with DoJ attorneys that the federal district court was the proper court for my legal action. The judge abused judicial presumptions to dismiss my case in the USCFC when the DoJ submitted a false affidavit by one of Joe Manna's conspirators while holding prima facie evidence that proved the DoJ affidavit fraudulent.

The DoJ refused to waive or return summons in district court and the first filing in that court was dismissed by a judge that knew DoJ had received the summons and ignored it.

All of the judicial discretion and judicial immunity used to dismiss and prolong my constitutional cause of action is derived from Marbury vs Madison and judicial review.

This is a well documented pro se action and  DoJ has not denied liability because the evidence is solid but they thwart every move to bring it to court.

I ask for the Tea Party's help because the government is trying to starve the people out of justice by using implied authority against expressed provisions of The Constitution and their stall tactics have bankrupted me personally in the process.

The Manna conspirators used their positions in DCMA to withhold contract payments and pro se litigation became a necessity for financial reasons. I have held my own but need help to end this matter.

Any advice is appreciated and I can forward any and all court documents to responsible Tea Party officials for verification.

Thanks for your time.

plb