The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Liberals' misguided love affair with Islam
by Minister Michael Brown
.
.liar-nObama Holdouts In Trump Administration
Hiding liar-Hillary Emails For YEARS
by Ginni Thomas
{dailycaller.com} ~ Judicial Watch’s President Tom Fitton is astounded: The Trump officials he finds working on Freedom of Information cases he files are still, typically, liar-nObama holdovers... Those holdovers, he told The Daily Caller News Foundation, are telling Judicial Watch it will be years before it can get former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton’s emails. “Frankly,” Fitton told TheDCNF, “we should be waiting just a few months for them to get their act together.” Trump should take the point of view that the government belongs to Americans– and its agencies need to tell the people what they are up to, Fitton said. “If there is no good reason for withholding information, give it to them and give it to them quickly.”...http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/20/obama-holdouts-in-trump-administration-hiding-hillary-emails-for-years-video/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20WeekendNorth Korea launches another mid-range
ballistic missile, officials say
by foxnews.com
{foxnews.com} ~ U.S. and South Korean officials announced on Sunday that North Korea fired a medium-range missile, in the latest ballistics test for a country speeding up its development of nuclear weapons and missiles... U.S. Pacific Command said it tracked the missile until it landed into the sea. South Korea’s Office of Joint Chiefs of staff released a statement Sunday afternoon stating that the launch came from an area near Pukchang, in South Phyongan Province, and flew eastward about 310 miles. The White House said it was aware that North Korea had launched a midrange ballistic missile...http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/05/21/north-korea-launches-another-mid-range-ballistic-missile-officials-say.html
.
Schiff Slams Trump, Russia For Fighting Back
Against Globalist Impeachment Machine
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The manipulation of their tools into positions of prominence and influence is indicative of the extent to which the Democrat / globalist establishment / propaganda media alliance completely controls the narrative... coming out of what misrepresents itself as the American “press.” Congressman Adam “Shifty” Schiff was just a virtual unknown with a super-sized head and pencil neck, who was usually viewed with the same morbid fascination as a car wreck, in a manner not unlike a sideshow bearded woman, the three-legged man or the wolf boy. That was before he took on his official role as the lead smear merchant for the Russia hoax, enabled by his position as the ranking anti-American on the House Intelligence Committee. Now he’s somebody, Tapper and the elites have made him “a star.”...Its time for this jerk Schiff to be taken down. http://rickwells.us/schiff-slams-trump-russia-fighting-globalist-impeachment-machine
.
We Don’t Need A Republican Revolution –
What We Really Need Is A Conservative Revolution
by Michael Snyder
{thesleuthjournal.com} ~ Are you sick and tired of being betrayed by politicians that use the conservative label to get votes but then never actually act like conservatives once they get into office?... As a voter, this is something that has deeply frustrated me for decades. On the federal level, there are a few dozen true conservatives in Congress, and I am very thankful for them. In particular, Mark Meadows, Raul Labrador and other members of the Freedom Caucus are doing an outstanding job. But they are greatly outnumbered by a huge number of RINOs that have fooled conservatives into voting for them. In 2018, it is time for conservatives to say that enough is enough. If conservatives will work together, we can do extraordinary things. But we just can’t sit back and wait for someone else to do something... http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/really-need-conservative-revolution/
.
CIA Can’t Explain How Identities Of 20
China Operatives Discovered
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ In typical leftist cover up fashion, the New York Times reported on Saturday that “The Chinese government ‘systematically dismantled’ CIA spying operations in the country... starting in late 2010 and killed or imprisoned at least a dozen CIA sources over the next two years.” They go on to report that “10 current and former US officials described the intelligence breach as one of the worst in decades. They spoke on condition of anonymity.” Of course they did, citing individuals and relying upon facts to make your case is far too restrictive for the NYT. The fish wrapper of record NYT, in exploring the source of the possible leaks that identified the individuals, never once referenced the most likely culprit, their favored political candidate of 2016 and espionage queen, liar-Hillary Clinton. Also ignored were her Muslim Brotherhood aide Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Hussein liar-nObama, Sidney Blumenthal, or any other members of the large circle of leftist individuals with knowledge of or access to and possession of classified materials in an unclassified, unsecured location... http://rickwells.us/nyt-covers-story-cia-cant-explain-how-identities-of-20-china-operatives-discovered/
.
.
.
by Minister Michael Brown
Liberals' misguided love affair with Islam
by Minister Michael Brown
{wnd.com} ~ Why do so many liberals praise a religion that, at its root, is quite conservative, if not fundamentalist? Why do they defend a faith that would not defend them? Worse still, why do they defend a faith that, in some cases, would do violence to them?
Last week, Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch and a New York Times best-selling author on radical Islam, was invited to speak at the University of Buffalo. But he was unable to say much because of the vocal opposition. He was shouted down and reviled, especially when attempting to read Islamic texts describing Islamic beliefs.
To paraphrase, “Not on our campus! We are progressive. We are liberal. We are enlightened. You will not bring your hate-filled bigotry here!”
In Spencer’s own words, “I spoke a few sentences and made a couple of points in between being screamed at by leftist and Islamic supremacist fascists who think they’re opposing fascism.”
Did you catch that? Spencer was opposed by staunch liberals and staunch Muslims. What an odd couple they make, yet this has happened time and again in the recent past. Why?
A few years ago, I read about a pro-Hamas, anti-Israel rally led by feminists and LGBT activists, among others on the left. Why in the world would groups like this support Hamas, which would kill or imprison them for their beliefs and their sexual or romantic proclivities? And why would they oppose Israel, which would welcome them with open arms? I’m not talking about religious Jews, who would certainly not welcome them. I’m talking about the population as a whole, which is quite “progressive.” Note also that it wasn’t the ultra-Orthodox Jews who were fighting Hamas, so the rally was not targeting them.
This makes no sense, unless there is something deeper that unites these groups such as anti-Israel animus or a serious deception they are buying into such as the idea that true Islam is always a religion of peace and tolerance; in John Zmirak’s words, they are Islam’s “useful idiots”.
And why is it that the most liberal political leaders in the West are often the strongest defenders of Islam? Why are they constantly telling us that real Islam is neither radical nor violent?
Getting back to Robert Spencer not to be confused with the alt-right leader Richard Spencer, he has “led seminars on Islam and jihad for the FBI, the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army’s Asymmetric Warfare Group, the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Justice Department’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council and the U.S. intelligence community. He has discussed jihad, Islam, and terrorism at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. State Department and the German Foreign Ministry. He is a consultant with the Center for Security Policy and vice president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative.
“Spencer has appeared on the BBC, ABC News, CNN, Fox News’ ‘O’Reilly Factor,’ Megyn Kelly’s ‘The Kelly File,’ the Sean Hannity show,” among many, many others, which would lead one to believe that he was highly qualified to give an address on campus.
Not today. His allegedly bigoted views about a beautiful religion were not welcome. He is in violation of the progressive PC code, which includes, “Thou shalt not insult Islam.”
The University of Buffalo’s student newspaper reported, “Spencer planned to speak to students about ‘the dangers of jihad in today’s world’ but constant heckling from the crowd made it near impossible for him to complete a full sentence.”
Ah, the blissful beauty of tolerance! How mellifluous are its melodies. How sweet its sounds. Hardly.
Spencer wrote, “These students have been hoodwinked into thinking that ‘Islamophobes,’ rather than jihad terrorists, are killing people around the world.”
Yes, those are the really dangerous enemies, those “Islamophobes,” not those jihadi terrorists. And the enemies are not the Islamists who enforce a death penalty for “apostasy” meaning, leaving Islam. The enemies are the ones who call this barbarism out.
Spencer noted the biting irony of it all: “For example, one man held a sign that read ‘Queers Against Islamophobia.’ The crowd booed lustily when I attempted to read from Islamic authorities about Islam’s death penalty for homosexuality. Even to read from Islamic sources is hate, apparently, at the University at Buffalo – unless, of course, one endorses such penalties rather than oppose them.”
Yes, these days, if you expose something murderous or hateful, you are guilty of a worse sin – the sin of judging. And on campuses these days, there is hardly a worse sin you could commit.
I once spotted a comment responding to a YouTube video posted by a 12-year-old boy who opposed same-sex marriage, based on the Bible. The comment read: “You, just like everyone who is against gay marriage, is a mentally retarded bigot. No exceptions. Now go to hell.”
This is the voice of tolerance, the same voice that drowned out Spencer in Buffalo. And how interesting that “tolerance” reviles a 12-year-old boy who does not support same-sex “marriage” but then defends Islam that calls for a death-penalty for homosexual practice. How interesting that “tolerance” wants to silence Christians who peacefully oppose homosexual activism as well as silence those who draw attention to Islam’s violent opposition to homosexuality. What a laughable contradiction.
But this is no laughing matter. As Spencer noted, “By shutting down any discussion of the motivating ideology of the jihad threat and consigning it all to the realm of ‘hatred’ and ‘bigotry,’ the student mob at the University of Buffalo enables that threat to grow. One day, the leftists who screamed, heckled, and booed as I tried to speak may very well experience the consequences of their actions, carried out by those with whom they thought they stood in solidarity.”
Yes, let that mob try pulling off the same stunt in strict Islamic countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan or in places like the Hamas-governed Gaza Strip, and let’s see how far they get. In fact, let’s see how far they get carrying a sign saying, “Queers Against Islamophobia.”
The left needs to end its naïve love affair with Islam. And may peace-loving Muslims help lead the way in working against radical Islam.
Last week, Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch and a New York Times best-selling author on radical Islam, was invited to speak at the University of Buffalo. But he was unable to say much because of the vocal opposition. He was shouted down and reviled, especially when attempting to read Islamic texts describing Islamic beliefs.
To paraphrase, “Not on our campus! We are progressive. We are liberal. We are enlightened. You will not bring your hate-filled bigotry here!”
In Spencer’s own words, “I spoke a few sentences and made a couple of points in between being screamed at by leftist and Islamic supremacist fascists who think they’re opposing fascism.”
Did you catch that? Spencer was opposed by staunch liberals and staunch Muslims. What an odd couple they make, yet this has happened time and again in the recent past. Why?
A few years ago, I read about a pro-Hamas, anti-Israel rally led by feminists and LGBT activists, among others on the left. Why in the world would groups like this support Hamas, which would kill or imprison them for their beliefs and their sexual or romantic proclivities? And why would they oppose Israel, which would welcome them with open arms? I’m not talking about religious Jews, who would certainly not welcome them. I’m talking about the population as a whole, which is quite “progressive.” Note also that it wasn’t the ultra-Orthodox Jews who were fighting Hamas, so the rally was not targeting them.
This makes no sense, unless there is something deeper that unites these groups such as anti-Israel animus or a serious deception they are buying into such as the idea that true Islam is always a religion of peace and tolerance; in John Zmirak’s words, they are Islam’s “useful idiots”.
And why is it that the most liberal political leaders in the West are often the strongest defenders of Islam? Why are they constantly telling us that real Islam is neither radical nor violent?
Getting back to Robert Spencer not to be confused with the alt-right leader Richard Spencer, he has “led seminars on Islam and jihad for the FBI, the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army’s Asymmetric Warfare Group, the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Justice Department’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council and the U.S. intelligence community. He has discussed jihad, Islam, and terrorism at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. State Department and the German Foreign Ministry. He is a consultant with the Center for Security Policy and vice president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative.
“Spencer has appeared on the BBC, ABC News, CNN, Fox News’ ‘O’Reilly Factor,’ Megyn Kelly’s ‘The Kelly File,’ the Sean Hannity show,” among many, many others, which would lead one to believe that he was highly qualified to give an address on campus.
Not today. His allegedly bigoted views about a beautiful religion were not welcome. He is in violation of the progressive PC code, which includes, “Thou shalt not insult Islam.”
The University of Buffalo’s student newspaper reported, “Spencer planned to speak to students about ‘the dangers of jihad in today’s world’ but constant heckling from the crowd made it near impossible for him to complete a full sentence.”
Ah, the blissful beauty of tolerance! How mellifluous are its melodies. How sweet its sounds. Hardly.
Spencer wrote, “These students have been hoodwinked into thinking that ‘Islamophobes,’ rather than jihad terrorists, are killing people around the world.”
Yes, those are the really dangerous enemies, those “Islamophobes,” not those jihadi terrorists. And the enemies are not the Islamists who enforce a death penalty for “apostasy” meaning, leaving Islam. The enemies are the ones who call this barbarism out.
Spencer noted the biting irony of it all: “For example, one man held a sign that read ‘Queers Against Islamophobia.’ The crowd booed lustily when I attempted to read from Islamic authorities about Islam’s death penalty for homosexuality. Even to read from Islamic sources is hate, apparently, at the University at Buffalo – unless, of course, one endorses such penalties rather than oppose them.”
Yes, these days, if you expose something murderous or hateful, you are guilty of a worse sin – the sin of judging. And on campuses these days, there is hardly a worse sin you could commit.
I once spotted a comment responding to a YouTube video posted by a 12-year-old boy who opposed same-sex marriage, based on the Bible. The comment read: “You, just like everyone who is against gay marriage, is a mentally retarded bigot. No exceptions. Now go to hell.”
This is the voice of tolerance, the same voice that drowned out Spencer in Buffalo. And how interesting that “tolerance” reviles a 12-year-old boy who does not support same-sex “marriage” but then defends Islam that calls for a death-penalty for homosexual practice. How interesting that “tolerance” wants to silence Christians who peacefully oppose homosexual activism as well as silence those who draw attention to Islam’s violent opposition to homosexuality. What a laughable contradiction.
But this is no laughing matter. As Spencer noted, “By shutting down any discussion of the motivating ideology of the jihad threat and consigning it all to the realm of ‘hatred’ and ‘bigotry,’ the student mob at the University of Buffalo enables that threat to grow. One day, the leftists who screamed, heckled, and booed as I tried to speak may very well experience the consequences of their actions, carried out by those with whom they thought they stood in solidarity.”
Yes, let that mob try pulling off the same stunt in strict Islamic countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan or in places like the Hamas-governed Gaza Strip, and let’s see how far they get. In fact, let’s see how far they get carrying a sign saying, “Queers Against Islamophobia.”
The left needs to end its naïve love affair with Islam. And may peace-loving Muslims help lead the way in working against radical Islam.
ht