Rudy Tirre's Posts (5090)

Sort by

Tuesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
WND, Trump neutering the mainstream media
NCczj-IrP0HEoqDvxm4Ol9aqtd-Kv3up8Gw1XzZPcQiGX6LPjqDh8s9EahVpVQz8Rwv6YiXR5AeXa5M9WzACqdpWFZdJteoBbg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Gina Loudon
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Is the End Near for NAFTA? 
VbghNl6GEyUTnyMgRRrx4qO9Aq1l03tZz3_LD113BwlEuAFFQcVV9-fEXlJ5nqNHYrVxrntf356AO5iWQlEa67RLwWq9L7oY3NErWC6NxKEKYnLNVqnnkVcRbm7nPg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Michael Swartz: Since being signed into law by Bill liar-Clinton in 1993, the North American Free Trade Agreement has been a political whipping boy for various interests. In particular, one group of Americans has never warmed up to the opportunities NAFTA could have provided.
          That sting was felt by those who saw the maquiladoras lined up along the border between the United States and Mexico. These duty- and tariff-free assembly plants were a constant reminder to those whose livelihoods were being erased by a southward stampede of American manufacturing. Thanks to NAFTA, companies could now crank out products once made in the Rust Belt with a significant cost difference thanks to the cheaper labor in Mexico. Meanwhile, those fortunate enough to get a job in these factories could begin to make their way up Mexico's version of the economic ladder.
          On the other hand, some estimates say NAFTA supports 14 million American jobs, and has generated $1 trillion in trade between the three nations.
          A number of politicians over the years have attempted to curry favor with protectionists by running against NAFTA, but none were more forceful or outspoken while being successful than Donald Trump. There's little doubt that thousands of onetime laborers and factory workers took to heart Trump's promise to repeal or at least renegotiate the trade pact with more favorable terms for America, and those votes may have made the difference in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.
          Promising to address the issue in his first 100 days and actually governing are two different things, though. Factor in Trump's tendency to shift positions on the fly, and you get what one Canadian trade group's director of government affairs called Trump's "typical way of doing things — saying completely unreasonable things as a negotiating posture." Thus, it was only a matter of a few hours — and conversations with both Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto — before the president's initial threat to drop NAFTA entirely softened to a vow to renegotiate the pact while reserving the right to withdraw and negotiate separate bilateral deals with each nation.
          Having separate deals rather than one common market seems to be Trump's true preference anyway. Trump showed this by withdrawing from the Trans Pacific Partnership. Then again, just Thursday he threatened to terminate a bilateral trade agreement with South Korea, calling it too "a horrible deal" that's left America "destroyed." So who knows.
          As a deal struck in the days before more recent technical advances like iPhones, Google, and virtual retail, where even a tiny shop has the capability to sell products to far-flung corners of the world, there are many observers who believe a renegotiation of NAFTA could rejuvenate the free trade movement and enhance economic freedom. They also see it as an opportunity to make the deal more of a trade agreement, eliminating many of the sidebar issues negotiators insisted on including, such as environmental mandates or labor regulations.
          On the other hand, there are those who feel that the U.S. should adopt a "Buy American, Hire American" stance on trade and immigration. Trump issued an executive order regarding that very thing last week. Others call that "dangerous nonsense" and argue it isn't a viable solution at the moment because (A) the last thing the world economy needs is a trade war that America starts, and (B) adopting a protectionist approach to trade and — to a lesser extent — immigration will only lead us in that direction. To lead in a market, one must first be able to compete in it. Companies that corner a domestic market often become complacent and lag far behind globally.
          Yes, NAFTA has problems. Witness the recent Trump move to place tariffs on Canadian softwood because the administration argues our northern neighbor is subsidizing its industry at America's expense. For its part, Canada also puts its own tariff on American dairy products, so we aren't talking about a completely free trade zone here. Broad areas of commerce between the three nations, particularly in energy and technology, are exempted from NAFTA.
          Whichever way the Trump administration eventually decides to go, the prevailing wisdom is that NAFTA isn't long for its present form. If he can master the art of this deal, Donald Trump may set the precedent for American prosperity in a global economy for the next couple generations. Because whether you agree with his trade positions or not, it's clear his message is "America first."  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Senator Points To ‘Material Inconsistencies’
In Comey’s Statements On Trump Dossier
wHFYoU7ZQGdXoEOHn0_el1sYYDiVSmPT61OiQVeai_qdtFlriyaS40U0L2dcwBcP4UBz_1hwvwjY-Wnx8tRlDUBvKn4KECWNhvsHfBFjmvhi9yUZDhQUCK362M6D8g49r8g23vf9MmYJyXLKXwY4paGe_bMWNqdtCvaTf92RyCxHUg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Chuck Ross
{dailycaller.com} ~ Ahead of a highly anticipated Senate hearing later this week, FBI Director James Comey is being accused of making inconsistent statements about the bureau’s relationship with Christopher Steele... the ex-British spy behind the Trump dossier. “There appear to be material inconsistencies between the description of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele that you did provide in your briefing and information contained in Justice Department documents made available to the Committee only after the briefing,” Grassley wrote to Comey. Grassley will have a chance to quiz Comey on the issue on Wednesday, when the FBI chief testifies before the Judiciary Committee in a routine oversight hearing...
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/01/senator-points-to-material-inconsistencies-in-comeys-statements-on-trump-dossier/
.
HUD Watchdog Kept 14 Fraud
Reports Hidden From Public
-8cVirjDbjU3obQsc_QGRjQRI1MW1sndBVF4edJVv5s8gS5c7UfJQowxFGhhIrhmSBlKGpnYdYxrRzeY82Eb_BAxK3Y4NrD-HmqBaS2KqonU6pOcEm247fQoQ-WxkCA-puU8d4FJnUarmcIgHo-hMC61sq6qz1U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Ethan Barton
{dailycaller.com} ~ A government watchdog withheld at least 14 reports that revealed department-wide problems that allow fraud and waste at a cabinet-level agency... The Daily Caller News Foundation’s (TheDCNF) Investigative Group has learned. The reports concern issues plaguing the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), including felons illegally living in federally-funded homes, tax fraud and millions of dollars sitting in unused bank accounts for years. The department’s 2017 budget is $48.9 billion and it has 8,375 employees. The HUD Inspector General (IG) posted its systemic implication reports – documents that reveal opportunities for fraud in agency programs – to its website. A comparison between that listing and another TheDCNF previously obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request showed 14 reports from 2011 through 2014 were excluded from the IG’s the website... http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/30/exclusive-hud-watchdog-kept-14-fraud-reports-hidden-from-public/
.
MEF Sues DHS for Hiding Information
on Its Funding of Islamists
KQX1UCvBamXdbUN8yPpANO3Odw4BX9L-l9Io4_WRhLoRuW-Mi7gZVeNlj-HVnQa6vb8OEIrQRYU0atg7KqGdzw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by The Middle East Forum
{meforum.org} ~ The Middle East Forum has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to secure the release of documents related to the liar-nObama administration's Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) grant program... The grant program, which began last year, is intended to assist "efforts at the community level to counter violent extremist recruitment and radicalization to violence," but MEF was concerned about U.S. Islamist groups – themselves radicals – receiving CVE funds. Indeed, grant recipients have included the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), an organization with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and a long history of sanitizing Islamist terrorism...
.
Repeal and replace universities
58-q2LiZXRwf3S2lrwbKypP_w-DTfyUjHIiYs0DZM7zCcMTSBpLG3CMBKMr3_oLsIY0UrVctaeZhOC2VtmEA8VAyk64CmIqNBmcQhgvwg7UxNAmtvBzH3NkpSEvScROQy30E4ObvmeHPNeXwcRO1Nw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Lawrence Sellin PhD
{aim.org} ~ The political left has made a complete pig’s breakfast of our educational system. Safe Snowflake Schools for Socialism... Political intolerance is now the official policy at colleges and universities across the United States with violence or the threat thereof as the means of enforcing extreme leftist orthodoxy. Eric Clanton, a faculty member at California’s Diablo Valley College and alleged ANTIFA (self-proclaimed anti-fascist but in reality anti-First Amendment) activist, who spends “a lot of time thinking about REVOLUTION,” is the prime suspect in bloody attacks, where a bicycle lock was used as a weapon to assault free speech campaigners and Trump supporters. Clanton’s Diablo Valley College profile has now been scrubbed, but according to the WayBack Machine, he joined the faculty in 2015 and “His primary research interests are ethics and politics.” Got that? He teaches ethics in politics...http://www.aim.org/guest-column/repeal-and-replace-universities/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Email%20May-01-2017&utm_medium=email
.
Glare of Corrine Brown’s One Door trial puts
unwelcome spotlight on Jacksonville nonprofit
qadC5SDjduEPHPff0mDJQ09CgcI5ZYHsoMJWjqE5P-r5K3uZNTn4fe6vFZet58Mt_pnxPrniK7WlPjLAmEZ4i5DUa2Tojjm_MHBgT5dCytJMzUWKZeXnG34Gx8JvFGillmhPit4YzEsv3MzFL6A1v1h3HB2eZoIwhoviuVv50Hj0It8WnyHIncJeZ3smaYxZnVT-1nDcW4LDw3bE6oFJzsJOww=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{jacksonville.com} ~ Former U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown’s fraud trial is training a harsh light on Jacksonville’s Community Rehabilitation Center and the politician who founded it, City Councilman Reginald Gaffney... During the first hour of Brown’s trial Wednesday, Gaffney and the Northside nonprofit were described by a prosecutor as sources of unreported income for the 12-term congresswoman before the sham organization, One Door for Education, became her cash cow...http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2017-04-29/glare-corrine-brown-s-one-door-trial-puts-unwelcome-spotlight-jacksonville
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
WND, Trump neutering the mainstream media
NCczj-IrP0HEoqDvxm4Ol9aqtd-Kv3up8Gw1XzZPcQiGX6LPjqDh8s9EahVpVQz8Rwv6YiXR5AeXa5M9WzACqdpWFZdJteoBbg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Gina Loudon
{wnd.com} ~ Before Saturday night, it was unthinkable for a president to skip the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Although, don’t mistake a president’s attendance for enjoyment.

Presidents have always had two main reasons for attending this gathering of the out-of-touch media elite. One: They fear the media. Two: They desire the media’s adulation.

The thought of skipping the WHCD was previously unthinkable. To disrespect the all-powerful media in that way would start a war.

What Republicans in D.C. have never understood was that the war had already begun. There was no amount of cozying up to journalists at swanky dinners that would make the media love them.

Republican presidents in the past hoped their respectful treatment and capitulation in the war with the media would somehow result in them giving up or being nice.

President Bush’s tactic of never defending himself as the media bashed him only emboldened the elitists and allowed them to paint him as a bumbling idiot.

President Trump is taking the opposite approach and is dismantling the mainstream media a little bit every day. Day 100 of the Trump presidency just passed, and if the media keep up their war on the president, they may be unrecognizable before the end of his presidency.

On Fox Business this week, I likened the media to “the person with lung cancer that won’t quit smoking.”

On Saturday night, the WHCD was dedicated to trashing President Trump, but this wasn’t the first time that happened.

At the 2011 WHCD, when Donald Trump was reportedly contemplating a GOP primary run to challenge liar-nObama in 2012, Seth Meyers spent two-and-a-half minutes on Trump. Meyers famously joked, “Donald Trump has been saying that he will run for president as a Republican … which is surprising, since I just assumed that he was running as a joke.”

An expressionless Donald Trump didn’t find it funny at all, and neither did anyone else outside of that room. Although President Trump denies it, you can almost see him deciding to run for president in that two-and-a-half minutes of bashing by Meyers.

The nasty treatment of Trump continued last night at the 2017 WHCD, and the media are so out of touch that they have no idea they are a laughingstock outside of their bubble in D.C. and New York City.

We weren’t laughing at the jokes told at the WHCD; we were laughing at the media who have become a joke.

Before Trump’s election, conservatives felt alone, and I was one of them. I, like many of you, would read a biased article or watch a slanted report on television and become so upset that some Americans out there could be falling prey to the media’s biased reporting.

With Trump’s election, voters in Middle America found out they weren’t alone, and we have a new view of the media.

Now, when we see a biased headline or a slanted TV news segment, we laugh!

We now know that we were never alone in our frustration and that there are countless millions out there who also recognized the fake news being spewed by the mainstream media.

The only ones being fooled now are the so-called journalists who believe they are still able to shape public opinion.

The media are only shooting themselves in the foot as they continue their overtly biased coverage, and we can only hope they keep it up.

WND has been on the forefront of exposing mainstream media bias, and it is an honor to be part of such a great organization.

This week, WND celebrates 20 years of reporting stories the mainstream media either ignored or distorted.

And it is great to have a president who is now fighting the media alongside us as WND begins its next 20 years taking on and providing an alternative to the lamestream mainstream media.

Congratulations to WND for an amazing 20 years!
 
 
Read more…

Tues/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Attacks On Trump At WHCD
Not Funny, Vicious, Degrading
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ CNN fake news host Ana Cabrera asks Ben Stein if he still believes that President Trump did the right thing by skipping the White House Correspondents’ Dinner... having previously defended him as being a punching bag.  From her reaction she seems genuinely surprised by her guest’s response. Stein said, “I thought that what Mr. Minhaj said was sickening, I couldn’t watch it for very long.” She responds with a child-like “Why?” Stein continues telling her exactly that, saying, “I think it’s stunning to belittle and attack and mock the President at such a base an villainous level and to describe him as a Soviet agent and Liar-in-Chief, especially to the media. The media is a joke in this situation.”...

.

‘No More Reasons Why Congress Can’t
Totally Repeal liar-nObamacare’
by Ken McIntyre
{dailysignal.com} ~ Since it was enacted into law in 2010, most Americans have opposed the Affordable Care Act, aka liar-nObamacare. In elections since then, Republicans have campaigned on the promise of total repeal of liar-nObamacare... We, political constituents and grassroots supporters, responded by giving Republicans the House, then the Senate, and, in 2016, the presidency. There are no more reasons why Congress cannot totally repeal liar-nObamacare (“What’s in the New liar-nObamacare Deal That Could Unite Conservatives, Centrists”). The new American Health Care Act, as it stands now, is not liar-nObamacare repeal.  Most Americans agree, given that only 17 percent support the bill, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll...

.

The End of Europe as We Know It?
by Yiftach Ofek
{mosaicmagazine.com} ~ In early March, European leaders were uniformly reported to have sighed in relief when the Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte defeated Geert Wilders... one of the continent’s most vocal opponents of immigration and European integration, in the country’s parliamentary elections. With Rutte’s victory and Wilders’ defeat, it seemed to many that the so-called wave of populism spreading throughout the continent might be coming to an end. Those hopes were sustained in late April when, in the latest balloting for the presidency of France, the anti-immigration and anti-EU candidate Marine Le Pen came in behind the centrist front-runner Emmanuel Macron; most forecasters are cautiously predicting an easy victory for Macron in the final May 7 runoff, and, buoyed by the results so far, are hoping for a similar outcome in September’s federal elections in Germany...

.

War Casualties in Afghanistan Hit All-Time High as Country Stands on Brink of Collapse
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ As America's $117 billion war in Afghanistan enters its sixteenth year—making it the longest war in U.S. history—conflict casualties have hit an all-time high... calling into question the U.S. strategy in the country, where Taliban terrorists still control a third of the nation and corruption runs rampant. President Donald Trump will face tough decisions about how to proceed in Afghanistan, where rebuilding projects have repeatedly failed and been hindered by corruption among Afghan nationals and U.S. contractors. Military leaders have already begun calling for an increased U.S. troop presence in the country, which could anger Trump’s voting base. The United States has spent more than $11 billion so far on other weapons, communications, aircraft, and vehicles for the struggling Afghan forces. The cost to U.S. taxpayers is unlikely to diminish over the coming years, as Taliban forces continue to control a large number of key territories...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/war-casualties-afghanistan-hit-time-high-country-stands-brink-collapse/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=425fd00679-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-425fd00679-45611665

.

You can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill
liar-Clinton for North Korea’s nukes
{nypost.com} ~ North Korea’s boast that it just detonated its first hydrogen bomb met instant doubts from the White House and arms experts. If they’re right, Pyongyang “only” has plain-old atomic bombs. What a . . . relief?... But, as one Chinese expert told The Wall Street Journal, the H-bomb claim still shows that tyrant Kim Jong-un is “marching in that direction.” For all this, thank Jimmy Carter and Bill liar-Clinton. North Korea couldn’t have done it without their gullibility...http://nypost.com/2016/01/06/you-can-thank-jimmy-carter-and-bill-clinton-for-north-koreas-nukes/
.
.
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
{lidblog.com} ~ NASA Electrical Engineer Frank Nola invented a electronic motor control technology known as the Nola Controller in the late 1970’s which is employed in spacecraft and tens of millions of applications daily back here on planet Earth. Some consider Frank Nola a true genius for inventing the algorithm behind a devise which delivers the optimum amount of energy to electrical motors, but not the EPA.

The EPA considers the Nola Controller nothing more than Black Box technology, which the high priests at the temple of government innovation long ago declared to be bad JuJu. Unworthy of the attention of the “non-profit” scientist producing cost-effective products for the ENERGY STAR brand.

Nola’s invention was such a threat to government ‘certified’ energy efficiency that it was literally banned from use in America’s industrial sector, the largest electrical market on the the planet. Why was there no love available for Nola’s creation? Money, really big money!

“If it’s not ENERGY STAR, it’s not energy efficient” wasn’t just the motto for the EPA, it has been the central theme of a federal initiative known as Market Transformation since 1992. The EPA claims that ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency has saved over $430 billion dollars, but has never been able to explain how their certified products allegedly save 25-50% more electrical energy than other identical products. Only the EPA could make such a delusional claim, because only the EPA processes the secret science behind their multi-billion dollar commodity.

Hundreds of billions of dollars were supposedly generated by EPA’s unique commodity, but try to find a single news report, government study or any evidence to support those claims. There is none. A fact well known to mainstream media, academics and environmental activist which have been the primary beneficiaries from the magical properties of ENERGY STAR. Vast fortunes were made by marketing ENERGY STAR brand as a global leader in energy efficiency, not from any actual energy-savings produced by ENERGY STAR products.

There has never been a National Standard for the measurement and verification of energy-savings in electrical technologies and products, yet lawyers somehow crafted rules mandating the exclusive use of ENERGY STAR by the government in the United States. Canada, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland and the entire European Community also decided to mandate the use of EPA’s superior brand, making ‘certified’ government energy efficiency into the most lucrative commodity on the planet.

ENERGY STAR was also selected as the primary source for GHG emission reductions in the Paris Climate agreement, which placed EPA energy efficiency experts in charge of measurement and verification of energy-saving for all countries signed on to that international agreement. But you knew that, right?

All of governments multi-billion dollar claims are based on estimations by bureaucrats as directed by the EPA; Lead By Example guidelines released in 2009, in which bureaucrats are instructed to base their energy-savings estimates on the number of ENERGY STAR products purchased or Green-built buildings erected. Providing bureaucrats a financial incentive to expand their bureaucratic empires by joining EPA Partnerships profiting big-time from the new Clean Energy Economy which was controlled exclusively by the EPA Billionaires Club, a group described in a 2014 Senate Report.

EPA’s superior brand of energy efficiency represented the single largest and most expensive component in liar-nObama’s Clean Power Plan, a fact never included in debate heard before the US Supreme Court. It was also the key feature in liar-nObama’s Save Energy Now program pushing for $100 Billion in energy efficiency investments in the industrial sector, but is only available to EPA partners. Like all of EPA’s multi-billion dollar programs, the general public has never been allowed to learn about EPA efforts to bring government energy efficiency to America’s industrial sector.

The Save Energy Now boondoggle had 24 universities providing ‘free’ energy audits at the industrial facilities of large corporations in partnerships with the EPA, and claiming their audits produced billions of dollars in savings which had been missed or intentionally overlooked by real engineers and plant managers. A concept so delusional as to defy all logic, yet excepted without question by your government. This is part of the Settled Science nobody wants to talk about, and for good reason.

President Trump recently announced the ‘close out’ of the ENERGY STAR program, which effectively ends the mandate requiring government to purchase only ENERGY STAR products and services from EPA partners. Opening up a trillion dollar market for American businesses to market products and services directly to our government, the largest procurement agency in the world.

This is a secret worth keeping if you’re member of the EPA Billionaires Club or the Media Foundations raking in billions of taxpayer dollars through non-profit organizations, whose revenue is dependent of promoting the bogus energy-savings of EPA that appear to exist only in the minds of the political elites.

If EPA can claim to have saved hundreds of billions of dollars without ever identifying a single technology installed, imagine how much money could really be saved through the actual installation of real technologies by  professionals with license to engage in the electrical industry. If you’re into jobs and wealth creation, here is a topic worthy of a sober conversation.

Which brings us back to the invention of a real rocket scientist and all-round freaking genius, Frank Nola the man who created one of the most important technological breakthroughs since Nikola Tesla introduced the alternating current system and polyphase induction motor. The true reason for banning Nola technology had nothing to do with science, but the acceptance of ENERGY STAR as the sole source of energy efficiency for government leaders around the world.

The Nola Controller technology has been updated with a Digital Signal Processor, increasing the performance of its soft start features and the ability to integrate with wireless applications and participate in a wide variety of utility load-shedding and Time of Use programs of value to industrial customers. Making it one of the advanced technologies on the planet for industrial customers, and a major threat to radical professors promoting 1960’s era ideologies as cutting-edge technologies on campuses across America.

Now that the Trump Administration has ended the corrupt ENERGY STAR program and mandate, will government finally lift the ban on Nola’s invention and other advanced technologies that could actually benefit manufacturing and production operations? Thousands of highly-paid professionals in the electrical field could immediately begin treating motor loads in place, saving hundreds of billions in electric bills annually for manufacturers, which in turn would relieve stress from our ‘crumbling’ electrical gird system. A win, win, win scenario for America.

This is not some pipe dream, it is exactly what the EPA has been promising for decades and failing to deliver. Former President liar-nObama promised skyrocketing electric rates under his energy plan, and we shouldn’t act surprised by his efforts to fulfill this promise. It was precisely the results EPA expected from the adoption of the ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency, and the main reason for the media ‘blackout’ on news related to the ENERGY STAR program for the last twenty-five years.
Read more…

Tues/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
by Conor Coughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Attacks On Trump At WHCD
Not Funny, Vicious, Degrading
KVaTsbgu_8N4CsmVu2iqEUj7VfW2nIA412WUxGRII6kSCNAbOFKu18DQ5K6tZJf51YZRDP4u9AcHPTGwaXp0RkgAr8O3A8JUvM1JmSIovzJVAjjtgoIxGiUmnQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ CNN fake news host Ana Cabrera asks Ben Stein if he still believes that President Trump did the right thing by skipping the White House Correspondents’ Dinner... having previously defended him as being a punching bag.  From her reaction she seems genuinely surprised by her guest’s response. Stein said, “I thought that what Mr. Minhaj said was sickening, I couldn’t watch it for very long.” She responds with a child-like “Why?” Stein continues telling her exactly that, saying, “I think it’s stunning to belittle and attack and mock the President at such a base an villainous level and to describe him as a Soviet agent and Liar-in-Chief, especially to the media. The media is a joke in this situation.”...http://rickwells.us/ben-stein-attacks-trump-whcd-not-funny-vicious-degrading-absolutely-right-skip/

.

‘No More Reasons Why Congress Can’t
Totally Repeal liar-nObamacare’
FcjvALsqIDK8FuBozmejvOEFggQh0Y9QLlIBM3WBUNOa6CMDQn7AMEBdpOumH7Exo7oLYPAOAsHu6KF_2qAa8ouL_LFw6-WSr-f5aROwICN492NPABUsfby_3sgUFmJHBXWwYvYA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Ken McIntyre
{dailysignal.com} ~ Since it was enacted into law in 2010, most Americans have opposed the Affordable Care Act, aka liar-nObamacare. In elections since then, Republicans have campaigned on the promise of total repeal of liar-nObamacare... We, political constituents and grassroots supporters, responded by giving Republicans the House, then the Senate, and, in 2016, the presidency. There are no more reasons why Congress cannot totally repeal liar-nObamacare (“What’s in the New liar-nObamacare Deal That Could Unite Conservatives, Centrists”). The new American Health Care Act, as it stands now, is not liar-nObamacare repeal.  Most Americans agree, given that only 17 percent support the bill, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll...http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/30/we-hear-you-no-more-reasons-why-congress-cant-totally-repeal-obamacare/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpFek9EaGhaR1JtTVRnMSIsInQiOiJHak42QnlUbHhQVE8wYjZUd2haMnFSQ0Fobit1MzFQaHVhSWRFVXVxRlwvTmZIRGtNQmVzOUt1Ylwvd3RsV21uY3owV05EZDVIUXl1enVLcElcL3VkckxmR2FpY2t5MFRBY3VqaENIWGU3S29BUDVLQnFSOUhxVGZrZUJZTjY3S09GaiJ9

.

The End of Europe as We Know It?
yZ0QiIl7YKEDn8kjFAMbSV3tkdgAhuUGL5pM9e5L6PqWCIaemr9y-8OEuJ-tBrXNhxIX1hCB4P2toi9ZYUCNdsr_2SfkEKZeS7mFdaT4101YZ4DpetSOiO2LawMl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Yiftach Ofek
{mosaicmagazine.com} ~ In early March, European leaders were uniformly reported to have sighed in relief when the Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte defeated Geert Wilders... one of the continent’s most vocal opponents of immigration and European integration, in the country’s parliamentary elections. With Rutte’s victory and Wilders’ defeat, it seemed to many that the so-called wave of populism spreading throughout the continent might be coming to an end. Those hopes were sustained in late April when, in the latest balloting for the presidency of France, the anti-immigration and anti-EU candidate Marine Le Pen came in behind the centrist front-runner Emmanuel Macron; most forecasters are cautiously predicting an easy victory for Macron in the final May 7 runoff, and, buoyed by the results so far, are hoping for a similar outcome in September’s federal elections in Germany...https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/2017/05/the-end-of-europe-as-we-know-it/

.

War Casualties in Afghanistan Hit All-Time High
as Country Stands on Brink of Collapse
iHIGvMYoJK_WkhcJjzvDTpg891bwSdxR9l-zsYIitp6zRU66MB5MarbaAv5UrV-ajqs6Dezkaf_s6MySz8ZfhnJHk7qkFSP2-Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ As America's $117 billion war in Afghanistan enters its sixteenth year—making it the longest war in U.S. history—conflict casualties have hit an all-time high... calling into question the U.S. strategy in the country, where Taliban terrorists still control a third of the nation and corruption runs rampant. President Donald Trump will face tough decisions about how to proceed in Afghanistan, where rebuilding projects have repeatedly failed and been hindered by corruption among Afghan nationals and U.S. contractors. Military leaders have already begun calling for an increased U.S. troop presence in the country, which could anger Trump’s voting base. The United States has spent more than $11 billion so far on other weapons, communications, aircraft, and vehicles for the struggling Afghan forces. The cost to U.S. taxpayers is unlikely to diminish over the coming years, as Taliban forces continue to control a large number of key territories...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/war-casualties-afghanistan-hit-time-high-country-stands-brink-collapse/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=425fd00679-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-425fd00679-45611665

.

You can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill
liar-Clinton for North Korea’s nukes
{nypost.com} ~ North Korea’s boast that it just detonated its first hydrogen bomb met instant doubts from the White House and arms experts. If they’re right, Pyongyang “only” has plain-old atomic bombs. What a . . . relief?... But, as one Chinese expert told The Wall Street Journal, the H-bomb claim still shows that tyrant Kim Jong-un is “marching in that direction.” For all this, thank Jimmy Carter and Bill liar-Clinton. North Korea couldn’t have done it without their gullibility...http://nypost.com/2016/01/06/you-can-thank-jimmy-carter-and-bill-clinton-for-north-koreas-nukes/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
EPA And Energy Star Teamed To Ban
REAL Energy Saving Technology
2j0Z4LAPAHTAe4BLCOw9GzC-0hKOfQaaPJkTRAkEuuKUqAMTf5556zh-RMs0G673SRE12RuLDMjWC7sp0oS2uMsu5pYFKCDwjGHZvWC2k42Lg4Dk7582hxEcZjHFM2Obnf1d5a2scgWZUwgb7gYj-WEJV9ixIMiaID0uXdlpNKXSiKWC9X02km_FF3m4b-rwGa_ghvG2NSqG-bUQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Conor Coughlin
{lidblog.com} ~ NASA Electrical Engineer Frank Nola invented a electronic motor control technology known as the Nola Controller in the late 1970’s which is employed in spacecraft and tens of millions of applications daily back here on planet Earth. Some consider Frank Nola a true genius for inventing the algorithm behind a devise which delivers the optimum amount of energy to electrical motors, but not the EPA.

The EPA considers the Nola Controller nothing more than Black Box technology, which the high priests at the temple of government innovation long ago declared to be bad JuJu. Unworthy of the attention of the “non-profit” scientist producing cost-effective products for the ENERGY STAR brand.

Nola’s invention was such a threat to government ‘certified’ energy efficiency that it was literally banned from use in America’s industrial sector, the largest electrical market on the the planet. Why was there no love available for Nola’s creation? Money, really big money!

“If it’s not ENERGY STAR, it’s not energy efficient” wasn’t just the motto for the EPA, it has been the central theme of a federal initiative known as Market Transformation since 1992. The EPA claims that ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency has saved over $430 billion dollars, but has never been able to explain how their certified products allegedly save 25-50% more electrical energy than other identical products. Only the EPA could make such a delusional claim, because only the EPA processes the secret science behind their multi-billion dollar commodity.

Hundreds of billions of dollars were supposedly generated by EPA’s unique commodity, but try to find a single news report, government study or any evidence to support those claims. There is none. A fact well known to mainstream media, academics and environmental activist which have been the primary beneficiaries from the magical properties of ENERGY STAR. Vast fortunes were made by marketing ENERGY STAR brand as a global leader in energy efficiency, not from any actual energy-savings produced by ENERGY STAR products.

There has never been a National Standard for the measurement and verification of energy-savings in electrical technologies and products, yet lawyers somehow crafted rules mandating the exclusive use of ENERGY STAR by the government in the United States. Canada, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland and the entire European Community also decided to mandate the use of EPA’s superior brand, making ‘certified’ government energy efficiency into the most lucrative commodity on the planet.

ENERGY STAR was also selected as the primary source for GHG emission reductions in the Paris Climate agreement, which placed EPA energy efficiency experts in charge of measurement and verification of energy-saving for all countries signed on to that international agreement. But you knew that, right?

All of governments multi-billion dollar claims are based on estimations by bureaucrats as directed by the EPA; Lead By Example guidelines released in 2009, in which bureaucrats are instructed to base their energy-savings estimates on the number of ENERGY STAR products purchased or Green-built buildings erected. Providing bureaucrats a financial incentive to expand their bureaucratic empires by joining EPA Partnerships profiting big-time from the new Clean Energy Economy which was controlled exclusively by the EPA Billionaires Club, a group described in a 2014 Senate Report.

EPA’s superior brand of energy efficiency represented the single largest and most expensive component in liar-nObama’s Clean Power Plan, a fact never included in debate heard before the US Supreme Court. It was also the key feature in liar-nObama’s Save Energy Now program pushing for $100 Billion in energy efficiency investments in the industrial sector, but is only available to EPA partners. Like all of EPA’s multi-billion dollar programs, the general public has never been allowed to learn about EPA efforts to bring government energy efficiency to America’s industrial sector.

The Save Energy Now boondoggle had 24 universities providing ‘free’ energy audits at the industrial facilities of large corporations in partnerships with the EPA, and claiming their audits produced billions of dollars in savings which had been missed or intentionally overlooked by real engineers and plant managers. A concept so delusional as to defy all logic, yet excepted without question by your government. This is part of the Settled Science nobody wants to talk about, and for good reason.

President Trump recently announced the ‘close out’ of the ENERGY STAR program, which effectively ends the mandate requiring government to purchase only ENERGY STAR products and services from EPA partners. Opening up a trillion dollar market for American businesses to market products and services directly to our government, the largest procurement agency in the world.

This is a secret worth keeping if you’re member of the EPA Billionaires Club or the Media Foundations raking in billions of taxpayer dollars through non-profit organizations, whose revenue is dependent of promoting the bogus energy-savings of EPA that appear to exist only in the minds of the political elites.

If EPA can claim to have saved hundreds of billions of dollars without ever identifying a single technology installed, imagine how much money could really be saved through the actual installation of real technologies by  professionals with license to engage in the electrical industry. If you’re into jobs and wealth creation, here is a topic worthy of a sober conversation.

Which brings us back to the invention of a real rocket scientist and all-round freaking genius, Frank Nola the man who created one of the most important technological breakthroughs since Nikola Tesla introduced the alternating current system and polyphase induction motor. The true reason for banning Nola technology had nothing to do with science, but the acceptance of ENERGY STAR as the sole source of energy efficiency for government leaders around the world.

The Nola Controller technology has been updated with a Digital Signal Processor, increasing the performance of its soft start features and the ability to integrate with wireless applications and participate in a wide variety of utility load-shedding and Time of Use programs of value to industrial customers. Making it one of the advanced technologies on the planet for industrial customers, and a major threat to radical professors promoting 1960’s era ideologies as cutting-edge technologies on campuses across America.

Now that the Trump Administration has ended the corrupt ENERGY STAR program and mandate, will government finally lift the ban on Nola’s invention and other advanced technologies that could actually benefit manufacturing and production operations? Thousands of highly-paid professionals in the electrical field could immediately begin treating motor loads in place, saving hundreds of billions in electric bills annually for manufacturers, which in turn would relieve stress from our ‘crumbling’ electrical gird system. A win, win, win scenario for America.

This is not some pipe dream, it is exactly what the EPA has been promising for decades and failing to deliver. Former President liar-nObama promised skyrocketing electric rates under his energy plan, and we shouldn’t act surprised by his efforts to fulfill this promise. It was precisely the results EPA expected from the adoption of the ENERGY STAR brand of ‘certified’ energy efficiency, and the main reason for the media ‘blackout’ on news related to the ENERGY STAR program for the last twenty-five years.
Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Netanyahu's bold move against
Western diplomatic warfare
By Caroline B. Glick
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Russia's Lavrov says ready to cooperate
with U.S. on Syria: agencies
PeXbAyJJDRhiZEo24hjEVOgNz0kd_wjcgl1kz_3sT3dowyVcQbHwrKpW4h6OtJrvCO7zQiPA7f1Cxefkf6OL8xXG33bSHv8vaJK8Eq8ZR1YOwGBlHhPrOl1jer3-fMEHfv7ifv59zA4tAGUjkEFbch0iRVErLr_ElT4X_qGwiw6MKFI9SV5PQw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{reuters.com} ~ Moscow is ready to cooperate with the United States on settling the Syrian crisis, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday, Russian news agencies reported... Russian authorities reiterate periodically that they stand ready to renew cooperation with Washington on Syria and, more globally, on fighting terrorism. Relations between the two countries, however, are seen reaching another low after U.S. fired missiles at Syria to punish Moscow's ally for its suspected use of poison gas earlier in April. Russia condemned the U.S. action. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-usa-idUSKBN17V07Y?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5904ffff04d3013e5e0510dd&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
.
After 44 Years President Trump Restoring
American Energy, Security, Prosperity
2twZXtHCymPr-3L_mTucocemDuEHwRgqwHfJlQYJrFxDlo8svKKnq9hJUDZglzEJMpHRvqLwz0qkqEvhcPu7eX0DqYBSpDNqSQvRDuWLzO3EbIrzbKDyKiYjrTO_s2e6Am_UvHpS_f2eQjCXpy8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ President Trump made good in part on another of his promises with the signing of an executive order on Friday that moves to once again allow the United States to develop our oil and gas resources... In the Seventies the CFR globalist establishment put America last and cut off our access to our own domestic oil through a contrived shortage. Efforts to expand our domestic production levels were denied, apparently in anticipation of future events as we were increasingly steered into a position of dependence upon imports, largely from the Persian Gulf. We were told America was running low on oil and that we had to conserve and look elsewhere for our supplies. It was an obvious farce then and it’s been proven to be one through the reserve estimates through to present day... http://rickwells.us/take-that-opec-after-44-years-president-trump-restoring-american-energy-security-prosperity/
.
Sen. Menendez Ally Dr. Salomon Melgen
Found Guilty on All 67 Counts of Medicare Fraud
7ksgheq4Xrhc5CFm3_MEa9UOkzi-VsYDb_FlFicVP5qlxVbGrSLwvfiiYh5UuJybWuODLJ3ZPePjJXLan_2Q5OBSfluzqYtStB8Y1sBl8yq2qns3KrTlM1PO8-nRnsBTLGV8prH_AGNZ-ngnvpCEevmbwc3cuyxmO6BR=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Michael Patrick Leahy
{breitbart.com} ~ “A prominent Florida eye doctor has been convicted on all counts in his Medicare fraud trial, raising the possibility he could be pressured to testify in the bribery trial of New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez,”... Jurors announced their verdict Friday for Dr. Salomon Melgen. He effectively faces a life sentence if no deal is struck. Menendez denies any wrongdoing. Prosecutors contended that the 62-year-old Melgen stole up to $105 million from the federal insurance program between 2008 and 2013, by giving patients treatments and tests that couldn’t help them...http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/28/sen-menendez-ally-dr-salomon-melgen-found-guilty-on-all-76-counts-of-medicare-fraud/
.
Rice Acts Like A Guilty Defendant As She Denies Wrongdoing In Unmasking, Spy Scandal
ZndTV91e9UWggCtRyfWcJG_jtnHXo9hF3_ghS-1p3yYoc7KOVXMVz8sASGLJyr4c2rE0pn7nigKnwG3EIOfJ7G2fxnPjWJwawHWyRZZSK19y1k2JtOTtYiuzk2w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The two Council on Foreign Relations shadow government comrades, Fareed Zakaria and Susan Rice, put on a stage performance in what is an obvious attempt at damage control for her being caught spying on Americans... and to try to stem the tide of negative publicity that is inevitable, given her likely hearings before Congressional intelligence committees. Rice is infamous for her five network lie-fest to attempt to mislead the American people on the liar-nObama regime’s misadventures in Benghazi which resulted in the deaths of four Americans, the incident she falsely claimed to be a response to a YouTube video. She’s not doing much better with today’s little “why I’m innocent and a patriot” skit...
.
George Soros fixes eye on new enemy
hnef5S-brSJAcz547vhJTJY3PYGwjPHE5d2xmZTIrV63sgyC9S7tEBBnkb_Yq5edUDrQVwqdpPPfBCjvUCqqeg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Bremmer
{wnd.com} ~ George Soros appears to have fixed his eye on a new enemy – a proposed Article V Convention... Operatives from Soros-funded organizations have been caught on camera lobbying state legislators in at least two states to oppose an Article V Convention resolution. Anthony Gutierrez of Common Cause Texas, a Soros-funded group, testified against Article V Convention legislation before the Texas legislature, and Ted Boettner of the West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy, sponsored by Soros’ Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, lobbied against such legislation in the Mountain State...
.
 G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Netanyahu's bold move against
Western diplomatic warfare
DT344UCaU-pnDqKGifWX3ahIPVcKkTBukDCkPSS5OA7PIt1i9dhmOijeAJbUaulO5c3RCSrUxUe4ID4zyqpATMmiLDqObRXytrDILYqhBovsRG0Q-50yry8XzXSfUa7bOuU_twE7Kb4kwA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Caroline B. Glick
{
jewishworldreview.com} ~ On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu adopted a new strategy for managing Israel’s diplomatic relations with the West. Long in the making and increasingly urgent, Israel’s new strategy is very simple. Foreign governments can either treat Israel in accordance with international diplomatic norms of behavior, or they can continue to discriminate against Israel.

If they act in accordance to international diplomatic norms, Israel will respond in like fashion. If they choose instead to discriminate against Israel and treat it in a manner no other democratic state is treated, Israel will abandon diplomatic convention and treat foreign governments as domestic critics.

On Monday, after his repeated requests for Germany’s visiting Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel to cancel his plans to meet with Breaking the Silence and B’Tselem, Netanyahu gave Gabriel an ultimatum. Gabriel could meet with Netanyahu, or he could meet with Breaking the Silence.

Gabriel refused to cancel his meeting with Breaking the Silence. So Netanyahu canceled their meeting.

To understand the strategic significance of Netanyahu’s decision and what further steps are now required to ensure the success of his strategy, it is necessary to understand what Breaking the Silence represents. It is then important to recognize how it is used by Berlin and other foreign governments.

But first, Netanyahu’s move has to be seen in a general context.

Today’s Western democracies are in a furor over the notion that foreign governments would dare to interfere in their domestic affairs. The uproar in the US over Russia and in Europe over Turkish efforts to drum up support for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan among Turkish nationals in Europe make clear how roundly democracies decry attempts by foreign governments to influence their internal politics.

This then brings us to Israel, and the unique rules that the West applies in its dealing with the Jewish state.

In the final quarter of the 20th century, European and other Western states abandoned their earlier support for Israel. From 1974 on, Europeans could be depended on to either support condemnations of Israel at the UN and other international forums, or to abstain from votes.

Whereas from 1974 to 2000, European hostility was largely limited to the diplomatic arena, beginning in 2000, the Europeans began to expand their anti-Israel policies to the Israeli domestic political sphere.

After the PLO abandoned the peace process with Israel at the July 2000 Camp David summit and initiated its terrorist war against Israel two months later, the Europeans began massively funding radical leftist groups registered as NGOs in Israel. The collapse of the peace process and the initiation of the Palestinian terrorist war all but dried up domestic support for groups like Peace Now, B’Tselem and Rabbis for Human Rights. But with millions of euros in their pockets and the unconditional diplomatic support of Europe, these groups were able to become players in Israel’s domestic politics and cause massive harm to Israel’s international standing.

As for the Europeans, their Israeli contractors gave them the ability to fend off allegations that they were antisemites engaged in systematic and prejudicial discrimination against the Jewish state.

Every time Israeli officials and others protested about their unfair treatment of Israel, the Europeans responded that they were simply restating allegations made by Israelis.

The fact that the Israelis they quoted were only able to speak because Europe paid for their microphones was entirely beside the point, as was the fact that those Israelis reflected the views of next to no one in Israel.

In the face of this assault – fronted by Israel-registered organizations staffed by Israelis, for the past 17 years, official Israel has been paralyzed. First it didn’t know how to respond. And second, when it responded, it was beset with the prospect of Europe retaliating by backing its political war against Israel with economic warfare.

As a result, time after time, Israel buckled to European pressure. Consequently, it saw its international status undermined and its very right to sovereignty questioned.

The most significant example of that buckling came in 2008, when then-prime minister Ehud Olmert agreed to transfer Israel’s postal codes to the EU and so enabled the Europeans to discriminate against Israeli products made beyond the 1949 armistice lines.

In another example, in 2013, then-minister Bennie Begin convinced the government to bow to European pressure – exerted through its Israel-registered nonprofits – to legalize Beduin settlements in the Negev built on stolen state land.

In both instances, far from placating the Europeans and their Israeli contractors, these actions convinced them to escalate their pressure against Israel and to adopt ever more prejudicial positions against the Jewish state.

The playing field between Israel and Europe has shifted in recent years. Today, the EU is fighting for its life. Donald Trump’s victory in November, Britain’s decision to exit the EU, and the growing power of anti-EU forces in Europe have all had a debilitating impact on Brussels’ ability to throw its weight around in the global arena.

Moreover, over the past several years, the government has actively promoted expanding Israeli trade to Asia. One motivation for the policy is the desire to diminish Europe’s economic leverage over Israel.

The diminishment of Europe’s power advantage over Israel set the conditions for Netanyahu’s adoption of his strategy for dealing with Europe’s war against it.

And just in a nick of time. Because as Europe becomes less powerful, Europe’s policies toward Israel become more toxic.

And this brings us to the nature of Breaking the Silence.

Breaking the Silence, which was formed in 2002, is a group dedicated to libeling the IDF and its soldiers and officers by constantly accusing them of carrying out war crimes. Since its inception, Breaking the Silence’s budget has come almost entirely from European governments. Germany is a major backer.

Germany’s interest in Breaking the Silence is understandable. As polls taken between 2011 and 2015 showed, between a third and half of Germans view Israel as the moral equivalent of Nazi Germany. The Palestinians, by their telling, are the new Jews.

Likewise, a large majority of Germans is sick of hearing about the Holocaust. And an even larger majority says that Israel is behaving unjustly toward the Palestinians.

Breaking the Silence’s work not only legitimizes these views, shielding them from condemnation as indications of the growing virulence of German Jew-hatred. It also, to a degree, justifies the Holocaust. After all, if the Jews are as evil as the Nazis, then they are illegitimate actors who deserve to be defeated.

Europe’s rapidly escalating campaign against Israel can be viewed through its rapidly escalating embrace of these groups.

According to senior Foreign Ministry officials, until very recently, European governments conducted their meetings with these organizations in private, far from the glare of television cameras.

This changed in February. During his visit to Israel, Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel shocked Netanyahu when in defiance of Netanyahu’s request, he personally met with Breaking the Silence during his official visit to Israel.

Last month, British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson went even further.

Johnson, who has a reputation for being a friend to Israel, surprised Netanyahu and his advisers when, during their meeting he all but refused to discuss anything but Israeli construction beyond the 1949 armistice lines.

Ahead of his meeting with Netanyahu, Johnson traveled to Judea with Peace Now and got himself photographed looking gravely at a map held by a Peace Now leader who pointed to where Jews were building in the area around metropolitan Jerusalem and Ma’aleh Adumim.

When Johnson was asked by reporters why he wasn’t meeting as well with representatives of the Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria, he scoffed. Netanyahu will give the other side of the story, he insisted.

In other words, for Johnson, Netanyahu was expected to answer the allegations launched against his government by a European-funded NGO. Johnson treated Peace Now as a more credible source of information than the government.

During his visit, Peace Now served as a general prosecutor of Israel. Johnson treated Netanyahu as the defendant. And he, whose government funds Peace Now, served as judge and jury.

Gabriel’s decision to opt for a meeting with Breaking the Silence over a meeting with Netanyahu took matters one step forward. In acting as he did, Gabriel showed that as he sees things, Israel’s elected leader is less legitimate than representatives of an organization that legitimizes German antisemitism.

By refusing to meet with Gabriel, Netanyahu made clear that new rules will now apply to Europe and other Western governments that have joined Europe’s campaign against Israel. But his move – while important – is not enough.

To ensure that his strategy of demanding that Europe treat Israel in a manner that accords with diplomatic norms, Netanyahu needs to take additional steps. Like his decision to deny Gabriel diplomatic cover for his meeting with anti-Israel groups, Netanyahu needs to deny Western governments diplomatic immunity for their other actions aimed at undermining the government’s capacity to carry out its domestic duties.

For instance, one of the major ways that European- funded groups subvert the government is by suing the government in local courts. The government must require the foreign governments that fund these groups to appear as sides in the court battles. In this manner, the government can ask the courts to compel these foreign governments to hand over documents relevant to the cases being adjudicated.

So, too, the government should require foreign government- funded groups to submit all communications between their representatives and those governments, and all internal documents of foreign governmental funders relating to their decision to fund the Israel-registered group. Given that the goal of the funding is to interfere with domestic Israeli affairs, those communications should not enjoy diplomatic immunity.

The penalty for failing to present all the required documents will be the imposition of a 100% tax on the foreign government contributions to the Israel-registered nonprofit.

Perhaps the most discouraging aspect of Netanyahu’s diplomatic gambit this week is that opposition leader MK Isaac Herzog refused to support him. Instead, Herzog sided with Gabriel. He insisted that Netanyahu harmed Israel’s relations with Germany by demanding to be treated in a manner that comports with international norms.

For decades, the political Left has claimed that it can manage Israel’s diplomatic ties better than the Right, which it castigates as inept, incompetent and dangerous to Israel’s international standing. By failing to recognize why Netanyahu’s move was vital for Israel’s international standing, or to understand that international conditions have changed sufficiently to allow Israel to stand up for itself, Herzog and his colleagues showed that their boastful claims to diplomatic capabilities are empty.

Netanyahu took a necessary first step toward implementing a constructive strategy for handling Western diplomatic warfare. More steps are still required for this strategy to succeed. But at least, for the first time in years, Israel is finally taking a constructive position in its own defense.
Read more…

Monday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Republicans, Learn the Limits of Loyalty
by Peggy Noonan
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Carlson Surprised By Constitutionalist,
Actor Richard Dreyfuss...
h0aCdkzGNpB7jhVCdotKauRW2XmUFeNoE7eKTFto5wVQWi06aWXrxBM6tSjfAuZa6aHssTuPVwJsyqGJpB2hPPy3GkvyhpuyyuHyrY2HiL2x76iQdd2_aHnRoBTrmIqsSzHmZC3DIDzGKaxOVpjK2w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Tucker Carlson was surprised when Richard Dreyfuss emailed him one night and offered to come onto his program... and “explain this rudimentary explanation of the basic checks and balances to you and your audience.” So Carlson took him up on his offer, inviting him on. Carlson notes that Dreyfuss attended Oxford, studied civics, knows a lot about the Constitution and is a smart guy. He asks his opening question, “But where in the Constitution does it say states can do whatever they want in contravention of federal law and the rest of us have to be quiet and pay for it anyway? Dreyfuss replies that it doesn’t say that. It simply says that the monies attached to things that the executive might want are the province of the Congress...
.
It's time to defend the Constitution
against Soros-led attacks
GM8gaPbJjab9yHRcN8E3ry5XHLshXZ6WWxjB28Nd4KHGEb0RR8KQpaFAXQpTgQ2oeYLQ8pJ2VFylqjVIoI61Ve-9q8Xev9dnHxG7cJ41_WR5-qAR17mQVEzgiHnxvPth_BQSVnoFfWWtRnPNq6ZAkQMH8QO94TcdGPt4sIyIcnasNCiwEWKr-ApkraZLwCzU6yYm1W8zsg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Gardiner
{conventionofstates.com} ~ There is most definitely a war going on in America that is largely unpublicized; it is a war so important that America's military veterans and all Americans need to know about it, understand it, and become actively involved... Recent reports indicate that far-leftist billionaire George Soros has chosen to enter the conflict on the side of those who wish to harm the nation by severely undercutting America's ability to continue functioning as a republic. This is no small matter and deserves every American's close attention, especially the attention of America's veterans... https://www.conventionofstates.com/calling_all_veterans_defend_constitution_against_soros?utm_source=Convention+of+States+Project&utm_campaign=6715fcf0c7-4_29_17_COS_Weekly_Roundup&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_45196125c1-6715fcf0c7-214976545
.
Sheriff David Clarke Considered For DHS To
Help Trump, Kelly Clean Up liar-nObama Mess
nWZ3h_QcHiUOnn1nRovGvtM3tc7Df18-XQg3-UVJGp5BpNbgiJ8OyP381quGUEIEosp6FKmgZvhx_xQtaQSzN79Tu2P5WOhwLREO9w0AgLyeRSUexY3Gmdggkcr2b01k71pGMCF0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Sheriff David Clarke of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, is reportedly under consideration for a position with the Department of Homeland Security, that of Assistant Secretary at the DHS Office of Partnership and Engagement... That office coordinates interaction and outreach to state, local and tribal officials and law enforcement. Clarke has often said he’d serve if called upon and met with President Trump in Trump Tower last November. He spoke at the Republican Convention in Cleveland.With the pace of the confirmation process thus far under the obstructionist stunts of Senate Minority Leader Chuck clown-Schumer being just beyond that of standing still, it’s fortunate that no Senate confirmation is required for the position. One senior administration official cautioned it’s “not a done deal yet,” and there will likely be an effort by Democrats to derail the high-profile supporter of President Trump...  
.
California Sheriff Calls for “Law & Order,”
Rejects Sanctuary City Idea
GXiFsBTlcrPkUMDPJT1pzLmObqMIbgXn04lrs7Cyv40SLe6iPXzIydkAXJR8BlHnZy0y5tTM_5gKtJw0PMGzrKAHUP0R884Sq7FEpnaLJlP3yGJ-zEKOR_q4z0zuTneztJUIwA8Tk8O9xUD7Z8OstpvYfA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Will Racke
{dailycaller.com} ~ Kern County, California, Sheriff Donny Youngblood has a message for immigrants seeking shelter in “sanctuary cities,” and it’s not one they want to hear... Youngblood is planning to ask the Kern Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution declaring the county a “law and order” county, which would ensure that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers can do their jobs without running into interference from local governments. Youngblood wants agents to be able to continue identifying felonious illegal immigrants in the county jails so they can be deported upon their release, unlike what happens or doesn’t happen in many California jurisdictions, the Los Angeles Times reported...
.
North Korea threatens Israel with
'merciless, thousand-fold punishment'
0m26xcfmbWPuMIEkMsMwZj0k68DZORxFMls2eMiMdQX1pKnkO3pSTUBzBv40YV3I9ob1COx34Dzg1ySSSXF0BMwpvu4X1YHqyyZ-bVepGU2F1dQvRmzwix0KQSM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by JPOST.COM STAFF
{jpost.com} ~ Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman hurt the "dignity of the supreme leadership" of North Korea, state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported Saturday... The comment was in reaction to Israeli remarks on how the Jewish State is affected by North Korean tension with the United States. In an interview with Hebrew news site Walla this week, the hawkish Liberman stated that North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un is a madman and that together with the leaders of Iran and Syria was part of an “insane and radical” gang that was bent on undermining international stability...
.
 G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Republicans, Learn the Limits of Loyalty
UrNoFgz4pUk8gDzNmHfhINCRmRw0tXBfi9XkrlfuzxSDKTUdEFTYKGXcklbkURneoRDmfqHLpYPNyUXPfjIV8Lv08HeGDLGAR8WfAfUxvwnyNMz9mywOiUgyaiaqFU6_FhcqzCm_B4nNeZRQ63uFdw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Senator Joni Ernst  
 
by Peggy Noonan
{peggynoonan.com} ~ No sooner do you remember never to join a pile-on than you wonder if you shouldn’t start one. Bill O’Reilly’s departure this week from Fox News is a real blow to piggishness, and I believe that must be said. He has denied all allegations, but the number of them over the years, and the $13 million in reported payouts, suggests a clear and obvious pattern of sexual harassment. This follows the retirement of Roger Ailes, who left under a similar cloud. I don’t know what was in the water over there, but it wasn’t good, it was poisonous, and I’m glad they’re doing environmental cleanup.

A lot of life is murky. Good things can come from mixed motives, bad things from clean ones. You can hold in your head the knowledge that all prominent conservatives are, essentially, a target in a media matrix dominated by ideological views that are not conservative—isn’t that a nice way to say it?—and yet be happy something bad has been thwarted. You can be aware that the exposé that triggered Mr. O’Reilly’s fall came in the form of a deeply reported piece in this newspaper’s chief competitor—it is the second-greatest newspaper in America—and you can suspect its focus on a Fox News star was fueled, at least in part, by both animal spirits and ideological animus. But you can still feel satisfaction that a culture of looking the other way has for the moment been defeated.

And again, this ought to be said. It is not conservative to be a pig. It is piggish to be a pig. You owe pigs nothing. So say the obvious.

We thus segue to the observation that Republican officeholders should by now have figured out how to speak about our ever-interesting president, and most have not. They think since he is a Republican and they are Republican, they must defend him on all things. They are looking at it wrong. He is Donald Trump. He is not “a Republican.” He is a wholly unusual historical figure who happened to them, and who now heads their party. They owe him an eager and open-minded willingness to work with him, to create helpful legislation, to join in debate and support him on areas of mutual conviction. They do not owe him a thing in terms of covering for his gaffes or oddnesses, mistakes or failures. They should not defend him on his tax returns unless they think he is right not to reveal them. They should not defend him on his refusal to make public the White House visitor’s logs—unless, bizarrely, they think that constitutes good public policy.

Being loyal isn’t being a lickspittle.

The president has a base of support. They’re with him and will give him time before they detach—if they detach. They hope for big, serious changes in policy. But they are not children. They are not unaware of his faults and weaknesses. Treat them with respect by speaking to them like adults.

Make clear you want to work with Mr. Trump but won’t cover for him. If the president doesn’t like it, and lashes out, so what? He’ll tweet that you’re not attractive. Laugh and say: “That’s what my mother said. But I have great hopes we can work together to reform our tax system. Best, Unattractive Tom.”

The first to break the code has been Iowa’s junior senator, Joni Ernst. This week she was back home doing her 99-county tour. In a community center in Wall Lake she was peppered with questions about Mr. Trump. Asked about his showy meetings with foreign leaders at Mar-a-Lago, she gently replied: “I do wish he would spend more time in Washington, D.C. That is what we have the White House for.” She conceded his “character flaws.” She said she supports “a majority of the policies versus the actual person.”

In a telephone interview this week she noted there was no “secret meaning” in her Mar-a-Lago criticism. “He spends too much money coming and going, and if we’re preaching about spending, we need to be following that.” One of the first questions in Wall Lake came from an anti-Trump constituent. He asked Ms. Ernst about “your president.” She responded, “It is our president. Mike Pence is our vice president.” She added, “Just as Barack liar-nObama was my president and my commander in chief.” A man asked how she could support a president who treats women as he does. “I said we would be hard pressed to find a president who doesn’t have flaws, I can’t excuse him.”

She is not, she told me, distancing herself from the president. “I’m just pointing out what I’ve observed in response to honest questions Iowans are asking. He’s my president. I will work with him. But we have to be honest, he is a flawed human being, just like everyone else.”

I close with a connected thought, on the president’s tweets. He hasn’t tweeted anything crazy lately, but he surely will again. He seems to grow anxious when he has an unexpressed thought. The next time he does it, reporters will rush as they always do to administration officials and Republican members of Congress, and demand a response.

Staffers and Hill people have mostly felt personally, professionally and politically obliged to refrain from criticizing the tweets.

They should stop feeling that way. They should not try to explain and defend. It does them no good—and it does him no good.

Staffers, throw yourself on the grenade. When pressed for a response, try: “Those of us who care about the president are often puzzled by his tendency to send out these sometimes strange and obnoxious thoughts. I wish he wouldn’t. You’ll have to ask him about it in the next press conference. I myself don’t do tweet commentary. I leave that to you.” If you are a congressman or senator and the president decides to tweet about Arnold Schwarzenegger, Miss Universe or Kim Jong Un, consider saying this: “You’ll have to take that up with the president. I think he sounds like a fool.”

If you’re a staffer and say that, you’ll get fired. But you’ll have shown some style and helped the country. You’ll for the first time get some respect, and will be able to support your family and go on to a good living while having rescued your reputation. The first paragraph of your obituary, years hence, will say you were fired for speaking the truth, not that you were embarrassing back in the Trump era.

It will help the president. He doesn’t really like to do things he knows will hurt him, but he has a hard time retaining the information that his tweets have that effect. He thinks they helped make him president and help him govern. He’s wrong. After the first firing he’ll realize there’ll be a price to the second and third.

When being loyal involves not stating obvious truths, maybe you’re being loyal to the wrong thing.

Being truthful is moral and good. It comes, for both speaker and listener, as a refreshment. Or in the practical, strategic language political figures respect, candor is the new cleverness. Everyone’s had it with evasions and circumlocutions. Stop. Say it true and keep walking.
Read more…

Mon/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Liberal thought police getting even scarier
6H0oMJDNBYF995aEpMfRCD8EmZaq7DEWpM8vaUYm8E17nYo1y4iKTcu1CXjTKmUPl8tZE3K8K0PHRgqc-CuPFqCZoNKOq4qD1uvMAtd_V0k=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by David Limbaugh
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Tillerson Seeking 9% Cut to U.S. State Department Workforce, Sources Say
_4seDWQAOISQn718krhDdMHylgzbaBVqDJjPT_lNO63JLln14PABadO7rf-mvFfTwNqKpvYC-58u9bzQRPCmrZX3J5ufeBmdmLmYriadSSoYoHdKSAV5YpfygQ6YxhLzwrzliF1oOytsLG4Qhx43TR7T=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Nick Wadhams
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ The State Department plans to cut 2,300 U.S. diplomats and civil servants -- about 9 percent of the Americans in its workforce worldwide -- as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson presses ahead... with his task of slashing the agency’s budget, according to people familiar with the matter. The majority of the job cuts, about 1,700, will come through attrition, while the remaining 600 will be done via buyouts, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the decision hasn’t been publicly announced. William Inglee, a former Lockheed Martin Corp. official and policy adviser in Congress, is overseeing the budget cuts and briefed senior managers on the plan Wednesday, the people said. The personnel cuts, which may be phased in over two years, represent the most concrete step taken by Tillerson as he seeks to reverse the expansion the department saw under former President Barack liar-nObama’s administration and meet President Donald Trump’s demand... https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/28/report-secretary-t-rex-begins-reducing-state-dept-bureaucrats/
.
DHS May Turn Over Jihadi Jeh Johnson’s
“liar-Clinton-Style” Secret Emails...
k__Q_O3Ja-SlifZPLNrTwKO00uqpF3RVYceDSDYGyeKs5DQ-HOc0EiAymilLr0nsxogYDrGLVFv1XX6fMvCGa0_ki6c97ml3F4wfxA81PtvZ0NuGhUM7qCsSx9DYTn7-GD1sNKz-I2c=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Jihadi Jeh Johnson may have hoped he had buried the evidence deep enough to where it would never be found, and if liar-Hillary Clinton had won the election, he would have surely been correct... But she didn’t, John Kelly’s in charge at DHS and Jihadi Jeh may be in for a little accountability. This is, after all, the “law and order” Department of Homeland Security now, the opposite of the crime syndicate Johnson oversaw. Johnson engaged in a personal war, his and liar-nObama’s jihad against border enforcement, immigration laws and the national security of the United States, helping to enable the invasion from around the globe by characters of every description. It’s understandable why he would circumvent public records laws and the Freedom of Information Act...http://rickwells.us/dhs-may-turn-jihadi-jeh-johnsons-clinton-style-secret-emails-saudis-kuwaitis/
.
America Is Losing the Cyber Information War
oMGAoOR7-GrxXZSC0DvW-EAPSXq3b9IS0f1_E6nG0rphmxcGh4NIvGLwQ0avpl5zLhNXE9T6w_l9SXTfv71urIL5YKNHJd6aKzM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Bill Gertz
{freebeacon.com} ~ The United States faces a growing threat of information warfare attacks and needs new strategies and organizations to counter it, national security experts told Congress this week... John C. Inglis, former deputy director of the National Security Agency, said cyber attacks are only one form of influence, propaganda, and disinformation attacks being waged in the cyber war of ideas. "Cyber warfare, in my view, is not a standalone entity," Inglis told a Senate subcommittee hearing Thursday. "When you're talking about information warfare, it's at that top-most stack, and it does not necessarily comprise of an exchange of tools or an exchange of literal warfare. It is, in fact, a conflict of ideas."...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/america-losing-cyber-information-war/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=5e8719e5eb-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_28&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-5e8719e5eb-45611665
.
Trump First 100 Days Exceptional Despite
Paul Ryan And Dems Obstructionism
iIyWXJMWNFVsTzt7KN7IepUgtmGyvdc_1mtLuXahQbBJiungU_4j8f_-eIIZVxQEblohpZyCsviNVLyN5MvvZw6ZCc0-RqKDTfcHblXeVvEKZxh7Zwphuo24UVl8WBg8FQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs has a few thoughts “as President Trump approaches the 100 day mark of his Presidency. Since President Trump took the oath of office, 99 days ago... he’s met with more than 170 business leaders, he’s held meetings with 16 foreign leaders, he’s held 9 press conferences, 21 of his 22 cabinet members have finally been confirmed.” Dobbs points out, “But the Dems have created capricious, frustrating obstacles for the President’s nominees, and in an unprecedented commitment to frustrate the legitimate prerogatives and authorities of the White House, they’ve slowed the process beyond any reasonable level of tolerance.  The President’s Trade Representative nominee, Robert Lighthizer, has been moved out of committee now, but he’s yet to be confirmed by the full Senate.” “President Trump’s successes, however,” says Dobbs, “are unmatched in recent presidential history...http://rickwells.us/dobbs-trump-first-100-days-exceptional-despite-paul-ryan-dems-obstructionism/
.
House Democrats Hide 2016 Autopsy,
Won’t Even Allow Members to Have Copies
798fZfOI-wT7vNr1AKrFoocj1oNydPn_wTZ4i8gpvW6O6Hi8YfqZB9Rh5RKnMad-JxeJ82SkKLzyBSfJ9Ws9zFYKwJyJ9MFEgnD8Zsj5n7fGjeEFwTemr6jL10apxhTLk40a=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Alex Griswold
{freebeacon.com} ~ An official Democratic "autopsy" detailing the miscues and mistakes that led to their 2016 election losses will not be made public but will be kept strictly under lock and key... The practice of election autopsies took off in 2012 when Republicans drafted and then publicly released a detailed breakdown of why presidential candidate Mitt Romney lost and how to fix the mistakes in the future. Democrats likewise did their own autopsy after their 2014 midterm election losses. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee set out to draft a similar autopsy after only picking up six seats in the House in 2016, far less than expected. But this time around, the public won't learn any of the findings...
.
 G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Liberal thought police getting even scarier
6H0oMJDNBYF995aEpMfRCD8EmZaq7DEWpM8vaUYm8E17nYo1y4iKTcu1CXjTKmUPl8tZE3K8K0PHRgqc-CuPFqCZoNKOq4qD1uvMAtd_V0k=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by David Limbaugh
{wnd.com} ~ The totalitarian left is emboldened by its selective suppression of speech. Just as scary is the deluded thought process that inspires its Stalinism.

Recognizing its inability to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the left has been chipping away for years at the concept of free speech. You have to give leftists points for cleverness, not to mention persistence, because they don’t openly advocate censoring conservative speech as such. They pretend to be protecting some greater good or preventing imminent harm to certain groups.

When they failed in talk radio, they resurrected the Fairness Doctrine, which is euphemistically disguised as a policy to ensure the presentation of all viewpoints but is actually a sinister ploy to dilute the power of conservative talk. They always have some excuse – and plausible deniability.

They protest conservative speakers or those easily demonized as conservatives on college campuses, arguing that conservative “hate speech” can lead to violence against certain groups. No one wants violence, so we must muzzle conservative political speech, right?

But it’s patently absurd to contend that everyday conservative speech is “hate speech” and that it leads to violence. It is pernicious nonsense. What’s worse is that these speech cops don’t acknowledge their own hypocrisy in committing violence – the very harm they claim to be preventing – to prevent speech that allegedly could lead to violence. Let’s just burn some buildings down and smash some skulls in to show just how adamant we are about preventing violence. I wish I were exaggerating.

But the thought-control zealots are now coming up with even more bizarre rationalizations to curb competitive speech. In a recent New York Times op-ed, New York University provost Ulrich Baer argues: “The idea of freedom of speech does not mean a blanket permission to say anything anybody thinks. It means balancing the inherent value of a given view with the obligation to ensure that other members of a given community can participate in discourse as fully recognized members of that community. Free-speech protections – not only but especially in universities, which aim to educate students in how to belong to various communities – should not mean that someone’s humanity, or their right to participate in political speech as political agents, can be freely attacked, demeaned or questioned.”

You may consider that to be psychobabble. What would you expect from an academic who describes himself in the same piece as “a scholar of literature, history and politics”? But I digress.

Let’s try to decipher what he’s saying. To do so, we must understand that like so many leftists, Baer cannot avoid viewing these matters through the grid of identity politics; everything must be evaluated in terms of how it affects minorities or historically oppressed groups.

Even though one could define unfettered freedom of expression as “guaranteeing the robust debate from which the truth emerges,” we shouldn’t support it, Baer also says in the piece. Specifically, we shouldn’t protect speech that insults whole groups in an effort to discredit and delegitimize them “as less worthy of participation in the public exchange of ideas.” He seems to be saying that if you discredit groups of people with your speech, then you unlevel the playing field to the point that any speech these groups express will be less valuable and effective.

We must weigh the “inherent value” of ideas against the dangerous possibility that these ideas could discredit other groups and thereby effectively silence them, he says. Thus, a “pure model of free speech” presents a “clear and present” danger to our democracy.

So the republic is better-served if we allow certain ivory tower elites, with their worldly wisdom, to weigh the “inherent value” of speech to determine whether it should be protected. If it arguably demeans a certain group – and there are newly defined groups all the time in the left’s world – it is not worthy of protection.

Thus, the liberal thought police can decree that because anything conservative firebrand Ann Coulter would say at Berkeley on immigration or other topics would diminish other groups, it should not be protected. She’s a conservative, and conservative ideas don’t have much inherent value to liberals and, in their distorted world, also discredit certain groups. Voila! Shut her down. The sophistry is astounding.

I urge you not to miss the most stunning aspect of Baer’s specious analysis. The thrust of the left’s message against conservatives across the board is that because of our toxic ideas, we should be discredited and delegitimized “as less worthy of participation in the public exchange of ideas.”

Just as leftists support the commission of violence in the name of preventing speech that could arguably lead to it, they would muzzle us because through our speech, we would discredit and then effectively muzzle them. Insanity.

We don’t want to muzzle liberals; we want to defeat them in the marketplace of ideas. We don’t want to commit violence against them, but they often want to do so against us. Boy, how they project.

Let me ask you: In their world, who would decide whether certain speech has inherent value? The federal government, no doubt, provided Democrats are in control at the time. The true acid test of Baer’s preposterous arguments would be to ask how liberals would feel if Republicans were allowed to make such decisions while in control of the federal government. How would they feel if a conservative had written this silly, scary op-ed?

It is precisely because we can’t have certain self-appointed groups deciding what speech is worthy that we must vigorously protect “robust” political speech in this country. The Founding Fathers knew this, and everyone with common sense understands it. But the crazy modern left wants us to unlearn it – and leftists call us conservatives a danger to democracy.

Whatever you do, don’t casually dismiss Baer’s ideas as fringe. This is the way leftists think today – and they are the people teaching our university students, producing Hollywood movies and largely controlling the mainstream media. Wake up and be vigilant! And fight back!
Read more…

Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Not Building the Wall
IS a Government Shutdown
by: Ann Coulter
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 liar-nObama's Lucrative Speech Fee Assailed by 
 Leftists 
Ip4b-VO7U8y6moREGJF9nn5LOln-LjN7LhWP-kQwTUq0J3banNtEPKswGccYBqh-6Bm2XeQagYRpCiwzrNYnnNflnT0VQHur00lHV6IKYhoRnEBTBVV0Wt01xb4ECg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Barack liar-nObama appears to be following in the footsteps of Bill and Hillary liar-Clinton, both of whom leveraged their political careers to rake in $100 million dollars through overpriced speaking fees. Already, liar-nObama has secured not one, but two, speeches for which he will earn a comfortable $400,000 apiece. Not bad for being "unemployed" for 99 days. By the way, liar-nObama is slated to receive a handsome $60 million for his forthcoming memoir.
          In the "Audacity of Hope," liar-nObama proclaimed: "The path of least resistance — of fund-raisers organized by the special interests, the corporate PACs, and the top lobbying shops — starts to look awfully tempting, and if the opinions of these insiders don't quite jibe with those you once held, you learn to rationalize the changes as a matter of realism, of compromise, of learning the ropes." Fast forward to today and this statement sounds less like something he's opposing and more like a great description of his presidency.
          Some powerful voices on the Left aren't thrilled with the dichotomy of liar-nObama's supposed sentiments versus his deeds. Sen. Bernie Sanders responded, "I think it just speaks to the power of Wall Street and the influence of big money in the political process. I think it's unfortunate." And Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren stated, "I was troubled by [this revelation]. One of the things I talk about in [my] book is the influence of money. I describe it as a snake that slithers through Washington. And that it shows up in so many different ways here in Washington."
          Neither of course has room to talk, because both have tarnished their own reputations with double standards. Socialist Sanders is part of the 1%, but evades taxes like the plague. For her part, dinky-Warren lectures America about the importance of equal pay for women, yet the gap among her own staff dwarfs the national average. For all the Democrats' talk about the evils of money (which is true to an extent), it sure is amazing how often they are the victims of their own drivel.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Prime Minister of Hungary: George Soros
“has Ruined” Millions of Lives
by Onan Coca
{sonsoflibertymedia.com} ~ If you think billionaire liberal George Soros is a horrible person, you’re not alone... It’s not just here in America where Soros has earned himself a reputation for being corrupt, malicious, and an ever-ready opponent of liberty. Apparently, the man who has been leading the Democrat Party for the last 20 years or so, is also quite hated in Europe. Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán delivered a scathing indictment of the world’s liberals and arguing that Hungary had the right to implement whatever immigration policies it chooses to, and that the nation also had the right to fight back against the underhanded efforts of Soros and his minions... http://sonsoflibertymedia.com/prime-minister-hungary-george-soros-ruined-millions-lives/
.
North Korea Dangerous Because Kim Is
Crazy And Not Very Good With Nukes
VTmwd6UyBJ5XFamLZGhRbhUe-L02HZ7luyIi0m29yyR4EzCjF3IeO6W-sqY8jEoZqOhnKx6le_YODr_B3SLTQi2nkfSS2Z11MCH2TLG6y6BTga4pNDSE7DRexvC6Rdhb75PR5oqVpgY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Neil Cavuto plays a clip of Donald Trump in a radio interview with Reuters saying, “There’s a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with North Korea... Absolutely.” Mark Steyn agrees, saying, “We have the wealthiest countries in human history, countries like Norway and New Zealand, that can’t project power to their own borders, and we have basket case states like North Korea, which has an all but undetectable GDP, but it’s a nuclear power.” Steyn contends, “Sooner or later, if North Korea’s nuclear, if Sudan goes nuclear, if Yemen goes nuclear, and all the rich countries spend nothing defending themselves, the world will collapse, and that’s what’s at the heart of the North Korean question.”...
 .
Heritage Foundation President
Jim DeMint Being Ousted
vUIFEN7Q8-lg2bC8mL2A_zzG7HuxfBWkwd9oHWC0w9QfkngZ1UJRnGqqL6HWKcXWhxSA1DKuTVISNmGgu1yd8aYN60fsB2hGjfbeaTmz6twQIXd7IwFaa2OPUqz0dq3Ke1kaHgA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Jack Davis
{westernjournalism.com} ~ Heritage Foundation President Jim DeMint and the policy research center will soon be parting ways, according to multiple news reports on Friday... The Washington Examiner, Politico and New York Times all reported that the board of the foundation no longer supports the former South Carolina senator. Former Heritage Foundation president Ed Feulner has been mentioned by the Times and Politico as the person who will lead the foundation on an interim basis... http://www.westernjournalism.com/reports-heritage-foundation-president-jim-demint-ousted/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=minutemennews&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=lib
.
Smokescreens in Islam:
Confusing the Public about the Facts
NURLMvSNtjHyGL5bt8RddHQ68hopexa90BqM5V6LbKgjDc4UUmxhLmLHvOd0nJnumEAvpvnLaZbZ5vi100KYkvF7mffhVg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
When Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri conceals important information and
distorts Arabic vocabulary in order to drive home a narrative of Islam's
deep connection to peace and security, he is engaged in setting up a smokescreen
by Denis MacEoin
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Following the terrorist attack outside Britain's Houses of Parliament on March 22, 2017, it was not surprising or wrong that many Muslims denounced the attack and declared it to be un-Islamic... There are said to be 123 verses in the Quran concerning fighting and killing for the cause of Allah -- more than a few. These claims also show that many people seem to be buying into the narrative of Islam as a perfect religion of peace, even if saying so runs counter to more than 1400 years of history and the official record of classical Islamic scholarship about jihad. Islam, after all, conquered Persia, Turkey, North Africa and the Middle East, Greece, Spain and most of Eastern Europe -- until its armies were stopped at the gates of Vienna in 1863...https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10283/islam-facts
.
North Korea Launches Another Ballistic Missile
bpfX7KWGbpSLnJMtcaOgJVu_iGVbT8ZM7QWN7Z7fBy351lwUkjoWJNatqh1drt38EoLnVFmftTWkGcd1oLGF3W4-drgrIxTAJM6t-4Nf5D2LN20H58T_037U44-bP28igmzCoDYGdJAeYuOl2OdIMndlfcOnXeRR7bvPTQiK01qCTsP7z-I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Philip Hodges
{eaglerising.com} ~ North Korea fired an unidentified missile from a site in the vicinity of Bukchang in Pyeongannam-do (South Pyeongan Province) early this morning,” the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) said... The South Korean military is analyzing the type of the missile and the distance it flew, Yonhap added. The last North Korean missile launch, which happened earlier this month, ended in failure when the missile blew up almost immediately. On Saturday local time, apparently North Korea test-fired a ballistic missile, and the word on the street is that it failed. Again...
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Not Building the Wall
IS a Government Shutdown
FC2puok4bdlfszEoETNJhXf-VnQvayPtcXJxLpEJdAI_UX25tlH-XDn-JIJGDVU9w8Mn43T2WkkTQogTeDLhwKIQGfqA-O9f5FAjkhxOP5U62-0lGXigeI_OowCZ70fspVIP_g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 
by: Ann Coulter
{freedomsback.com} ~ Fake News’ question of the week: Will Trump risk a government shutdown over the wall?

The media flip back and forth on who’s to blame for a government shutdown depending on which branch is controlled by Republicans. But the “shutdown” hypothetical in this case is a trick question.

A failure to build the wall IS a government shutdown.

Of course it would be unfortunate if schoolchildren couldn’t visit national parks and welfare checks didn’t get mailed on time. But arranging White House tours isn’t the primary function of the government.

The government’s No. 1 job is to protect the nation.

This has always been true, but it’s especially important at this moment in history, when we have drugs, gang members, diseases and terrorists pouring across our border. The failure of the government to close our border is the definition of a government shutdown.

This isn’t like other shutdowns. Democrats can’t wail about Republicans cutting Social Security or school lunches. They are willing to shut the government down because they don’t want borders.

Take that to the country!

As commander in chief, Trump doesn’t need Congress to build a wall. The Constitution charges him with defending the nation. Contrary to what you may have heard from various warmongers on TV and in Trump’s Cabinet, that means defending our borders — not Ukraine’s borders.

Building a wall is not only Trump’s constitutional duty, but it’s also massively popular.

Although Trump doesn’t need congressional approval for a wall, it was smart for him to demand a vote. Let the Democrats run for re-election on opposing the wall.

Let Sen. Claire McCaskill explain to the parents of kids killed by illegals that she thought a wall was inhumane.

Let Sen. Angus King say to the people of Maine that instead of a wall that would block heroin from pouring into our country, he thought a better plan was to sponsor a bunch of treatment centers for after your kid is already addicted.

Let Sen. Chuck clown-Schumer tell us why it’s OK for Israel to have a wall, but not us.

Let open borders Republicans like Sen. Marco Rubio tell African-Americans that it’s more important to help illegal aliens than to help black American teenagers, currently suffering a crippling unemployment rate.

Republicans are both corrupt and stupid, so it’s hard to tell which one animates their opposition to the wall. But the Democrats are bluffing. They’re trying to get the GOP to fold before they show us their pair of threes.

Now that Trump has capitulated on even asking for funding for a wall, the Democrats are on their knees saying, “Thank you, God! Thank you, God!”

No politician wants to have to explain a vote against the wall. What the Democrats want is for Trump to be stuck explaining why he didn’t build the wall.

Then it will be a bloodbath. Not only Trump, but also the entire GOP, is dead if he doesn’t build a wall. Republicans will be wiped out in the midterms, Democrats will have a 300-seat House majority, and Trump will have to come up with an excuse for why he’s not running for re-election.

The New York Times and MSNBC are not going to say, “We are so impressed with his growth in office, we’re going to drop all that nonsense about Russia and endorse the Republican ticket!”

No, at that point, Trump will be the worst of everything.

No one voted for Trump because of the “Access Hollywood” tape. They voted for him because of his issues; most prominently, his promise to build “a big beautiful wall.” And who’s going to pay for it? MEXICO!

You can’t say that at every campaign rally for 18 months and then not build a wall.

Do not imagine that a Trump double-cross on the wall will not destroy the Republican Party. Oh, we’ll get them back. No, you won’t. Trump wasn’t a distraction: He was the last chance to save the GOP.

Millions of Americans who hadn’t voted in 30 years came out in 2016 to vote for Trump. If he betrays them, they’ll say, “You see? I told you. They’re all crooks.”

No excuses will work. No fiery denunciations of the courts, the Democrats or La Raza will win them back, even if Trump comes up with demeaning Twitter names for them.

It would be an epic betrayal — worse than Bush betraying voters on “no new taxes.” Worse than LBJ escalating the Vietnam War. There would be nothing like it in the history of politics.

He’s the commander in chief! He said he’d build a wall. If he can’t do that, Trump is finished, the Republican Party is finished, and the country is finished.
Read more…

Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Today’s Nullification Crisis
by Myron Magnet
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Want the Big Bucks? Join the Government 
2XBTrn7QeeAeKSdGdeY8pBBIsIHYhS-GXtYa8Lba-6el9rQuc0cHdRieJ4tmZ-kwJ8vHLZq_SSrCkxQeWn6G-YtWLrBNN-GqClJkN1Xk74YNxSQGHQYQMz2K1y_Plw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
A new analysis shows that the public-private sector wage disparity has not improved. In fact, it's worsened. Previously, the CBO, based on 2005-2010 data, calculated that public sector employees were compensated at a roughly 16% better rate than commensurate private sector workers. That disparity is now up to 17%, according to 2011-2015 data.
          And check this out, via Government Executive: "Federal employees with bachelor's degrees as their highest level of education earned an average of 5 percent more in wages than their private sector counterparts, 52 percent more in benefits and 21 percent more in total compensation. Federal workers with a high school diploma or less earned a 34 percent more in wages than those in the private sector, 93 percent more in benefits and 53 percent more in total compensation." As nice as it must be to have a higher base pay as a government worker, it seems the primary catalyst for the increasing disparity is the extremely lucrative benefits. Meanwhile, those of us in the private sector are struggling just to pay for health insurance.
          An aside and caveat: There are extremely hard workers who earn their pay as public servants. Military personnel are government workers, and many others do admirable work. The problem is we have people like the EPA employee who browse porn all day and IRS employees who steal from taxpayers. When you factor in the total job security that government workers have and then lump in extra pay and benefits, the private sector simply can't compete. Notwithstanding the fact there are public sector people who do their jobs well and work hard, the inherent imbalance is glaring. And as much as Democrats rail against the gender wage gap, don't expect any demands to balance the public-private sector wage disparity.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Rep Smith Asks DOJ To Prosecute Platte River
Owner Still Hiding liar-Clinton Server Docs
8Kv9T0vsxQmnyMxQYiFPgrh91eL6k9PbQt1xRwCrgrt3FXH8Xyl1_9da-mGQjZmvklYCBkYRnjBwiX3G864tk8z67x9v0_oCtdutbQCUd_VvQxYAM3VqzlUtSv8MnoRKBpKcoJo-R0QTZUSu=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Accountability is a slow process in Washington DC, and it often never comes, particularly if your last name is liar-Clinton or liar-nObama... For those involved in aiding and facilitating the lawbreaking of those who are generally above the law, the day of reckoning sometimes does come, particularly when the other side wins elections. Texas Rep Lamar Smith, the Republican chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, has issued a referral to the Justice Department for Treve Suazo, the CEO of Platte River Networks, for obstruction of justice and making false statements...http://rickwells.us/rep-smith-asks-doj-prosecute-platte-river-owner-still-hiding-clinton-server-docs/
.
German Companies Silent on Iran’s Holocaust
Denial Following Call to Cease Business
bq9TY72TVMSRByevqcP-9UBhGBQVyCK1umfnDhWGZHubFuPfo3F3T3BNa8UDvFtcaJxqs0Dw1iB2TP8I9fPx8lQ2nfEyHLA7t7zeEKcN=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ A cadre of German companies seeking to engage in business with Iran is remaining silent in the face of calls by an international advocacy group to shun working with the Islamic Republic until it disavows... its institutionalized anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel. United Against Nuclear Iran, or UANI, has petitioned more than a dozen major German companies, asking them to sign a declaration promising to not do business with Iran until its leadership stops denying the Holocaust and calling for the destruction of the Jewish state...http://freebeacon.com/national-security/german-companies-silent-irans-holocaust-denial-following-call-cease-business/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=c8c41a0bc9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_28&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-c8c41a0bc9-45611665
.
Soros Sucked $5 Million US Tax Dollars
For Thursday’s “Berkeley” Attack
Xfk4GH2Dcwzbu59FnDEbQtGCu-HBFI-7yGwd3BkwFSFowKJbJi-eVge_m0j4oRJE6GpjHxmH3dCfoAr5rnnH8ulN5VtsC56bAAtI2tCdU7dIL0GjBMC1NpnH0ZMGPQQJXA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ It looks like it could be Berkeley in the midst of one of the attacks from a Soros funded group, perhaps the Antifa radicals... It could be, and there’s really only one difference of any significance, this Soros orchestrated chaos is taking place in Macedonia, a country he’s been five years in the process of destabilizing, with the help of a pilfering pretend US ‘president’ willing to steal our tax dollars. Americans weren’t asked if their money should go to fund liar-nObama and Soros government destabilization efforts in Europe, we’d have undoubtedly told them to stuff it...Why the committee isn't going after liar-nObama, liar-Hillary, hanoi-Kerry and Soros, but rather go after Flynn. http://rickwells.us/soros-sucked-5-million-us-tax-dollars-thursdays-berkeley-attack-macedonia-parliament/
.
Rex Tillerson Calls On The UN To
Increase Pressure On North Korea
jCHtQDXe_VrVWW_fnCpRnWq1CdOHpqi48w_4vVBgHvhsmq2yZrgDHTHD0GSFL_Eioj5VYA4TB-7FRHrt62QxA7n8Shp3AqPOrpakMTy-Ggf4_AgyXehnCj2yBbT3zn3-PTiEn8w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{westernjournalism.com} ~ Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Friday called for a full-scale, global effort to pressure North Korea into scrapping its aggressive plans for a nuclear arsenal... His comments came a day after he said North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un was “not crazy” and President Donald Trump said there was “absolutely” a chance of a major conflict with North Korea. “All options for responding to future provocations must remain on the table,” Tillerson said during a special United Nations session called to discuss the North Korean crisis...http://www.westernjournalism.com/rex-tillerson-calls-on-the-un-to-increase-pressure-on-north-korea/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=WJDailyEmail&utm_content=2017-04-28
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Today’s Nullification Crisis
wBMRjpVmmVz3-av4otq_WeioSWR01kGkEmN8yuJEPL_qzG3vYi9ZhupiiQyJlZpaH57CIUT3d-uFIgEU38gR35HDAI42tsPS6gHVNCl_XnNO7NdSLjmzCbAqaLBY-jUvVzJOFHJrWENVdFsPscv4MTUv1GUqwAdp9dUMBwI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Myron Magnet
{city-journal.org} ~ Wait: let me get this straight. It’s legally binding for two underlings in the civil rights divisions of the Departments of Education and Justice to send out a “Dear Colleague” letter declaring that, as these bureaucrats interpret Title IX of Congress’s  Education Amendments of 1972, colleges and universities can’t get any federal funding if they don’t make special accommodations for transgendered students, however defined; but it is not legal for the president of the United States, pursuant to the Constitution’s injunction that he ensure that the laws “be faithfully executed,” to deny some federal funding to cities that declare themselves “sanctuaries” from federal immigration laws, and that accordingly forbid their officials from cooperating with federal authorities in implementing them, as Congress has demanded?

Such is the implication of federal Judge William Orrick’s ruling in California this week that it is unconstitutional for President Donald Trump to attach conditions to federal funding to such sanctuary localities. After all, the president was merely enforcing compliance with the law of the land in a much more straightforward manner than the two functionaries who threatened to withhold federal funding if colleges failed to satisfy every whim of transgendered students.

To be sure, defeated presidential candidate liar-Hillary Clinton, churlishly flouting America’s long tradition of gracious acceptance of electoral results and the seamless transfer of power from one administration to the next, called on her supporters to “resist, insist, persist, enlist” in her opposition to Trump and the GOP-dominated Congress. And few have heeded her call as substantively as leftish federal judges, who all seem to imagine themselves as even more heroic defenders of blue-state orthodoxy than Senate minority leader Chuck clown-Schumer himself.

But the “Resistance,” as the anti-Trump left styles itself, is sailing into very dangerous waters, where earlier negationist movements have foundered. Do these pro-illegal-immigrationists really want to follow the nullification movement of the 1830s, when South Carolina toyed with the idea that it could reject a tariff passed by Congress, because it weighed so heavily on that state’s economy? Nullification advocates, led by John C. Calhoun, who had resigned the vice-presidency so as more effectively to oppose the tariff from the Senate, appealed to the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions written, respectively, by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Kentucky Resolution described the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts as being “void and of no force” in that state, though the state legislature didn’t dare use Jefferson’s original language that its resolution constituted a “nullification” of the acts. Madison’s Virginia Resolution was merely hortatory, and he was aghast to hear Jefferson declare explicitly that he was willing to have the two states secede from the Union in response to the acts of John Adams’s Federalist-dominated Congress. But of course Calhoun and other Southerners caught the separatist implication of Jefferson’s Kentucky Resolution and claimed that their nullification had the sanction of the Founding Fathers. President Andrew Jackson caught their drift and rightly predicted that “the tariff was only a pretext, and disunion and southern confederacy the real object. The next pretext will be the negro, or slavery question,” which a generation later ignited the Civil War...
https://www.city-journal.org/html/todays-nullification-crisis-15159.html
Read more…

Sat/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The FBI and liar-Hillary, Again
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump And Americans Want The Wall –
Vote In A New Congress...
MQExagin_pHIzCbh3Iz8aD9-gDwcdnn0Nbq9zZmptyAd5xSZoElHtI0Oh0t5BH_GrYn7BmVADNMj7E7-Ct5EfD6Z_QXchXFtxr1mWfoM2htnd_Ww7Nlbcs8f5q1L=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ When  Americans voted for Donald Trump as their President, it was because we believed he would return our country to us and that he was a man who was beyond the reach of the swamp creatures he promised to eliminate... A pillar of his contract with the American people is the border wall. We voted him in, he says he wants to build it, Congress needs to fund it. They supposedly work for us and we’ve given them clear instructions. Replace Speaker Ryan, make an example out of the traitor Mitch McConnell in some way, do whatever it takes. Do not buckle to globalist pressure, Mr. President. We did our part, you must find a way to do yours. Evidence that that sentiment is widespread came in hearings before the National Security Subcommittee of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday. Four witnesses spoke in favor of the wall, one liberal anti-American spoke against...

.

Iran in Syria: A Gathering Storm?
2AJij5Q2OvXrHuI_vE-69Rm3qEgvBi0DYGyLacx8Dl6rUsP3UoJP_IwHTbY3M9L13wXX_QBoztE5AZ2xORA7XPqQKOt1gv5yq86NkqoJD3u4Q5c6UGYjHtduZVaNY1UW5j7sls-ML_odCy1KJ350-fagUikBjulxzP6pw-UCCC93b34_SKxz=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by P. David Hornik
{frontpagemag.com} ~ The Iranian regime, as it has made clear in countless threats, rallies, and missile displays, wants to destroy Israel, the “Little Satan.”... Given Israel’s military might and, according to foreign reports, nuclear arsenal, Iran’s goal is probably unattainable. But the nearer Iran gets—or perceives itself to get—to that goal, the more warfare and instability is likely to ensue. At present, thanks to Syria’s collapse into civil war and the liar-nObama administration’s—at best—inept policy there, Iran is within reach of establishing a permanent military presence to Israel’s north—a surefire recipe for ongoing struggle and menace... http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266537/iran-syria-gathering-storm-p-david-hornik
.
UN Interference with Efforts to
Repeal and Replace liar-nObamacare
qJBPbE9FbpHWVSCvduK15WoRLb4Njc4acMksGbZpIbMvl5WgR3KP05JO1DdtIqFexL9TjP2YIxS7Gs6BNcx7RtY_YZYYXLw_ntlO1bk1BQWBc1Yb9mkClc4H5HrrdoTsCgUVH2MznyzfU55xMTkEG_3ik-DEQ5N1GPZc-U_1kbFRLLGVoHRmg-cP7BN6qAI_H77GYgRZUUVMPZt2dM_wi78M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Joseph Klein
{frontpagemag.com} ~ The United Nations is once again sticking its nose into the domestic affairs of the United States in violation of its own charter (Article 2, para. 7)... The Washington Post has uncovered a transmittal letter dated February 2, 2017 from the UN Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights, forwarding to the then acting U.S. Secretary of State, Thomas Shannon, Jr., a complaint from one of the UN’s Special Rapporteurs about plans to repeal and replace liar-nObamacare. This Special Rapporteur “on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health,” Dainius Puras, believes it is within his mandate to intervene in the internal debate going on within the U.S. Congress and the executive branch as to what to do about liar-nObamacare...The WH and Congress should kick the UN out of the United States and stop funding them.
.
EPA Administrator Pruitt Hopeful President Trump Will Exit UN Paris “Climate” Agreement
AAks2QgHeDp_9eOUuAwcGW5eaaiDRxL1E2K8s31G6OYuuIjodSp05oIf7UcaUKJhk0K8XKv2lxFSsQ3zH-xSTRhPITNz5MG44FCiURa8VMTA2cSJypg-NxE0-Fs9bWYxXpQX2SA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt speaks to the possibility that the United States will pull out of the Paris Climate hoax, a treaty that was never ratified in the first place beyond some Chinese shenanigans by the former pretend ‘president.’... The Senate never approved it, they never even took it up because liar-nObama knew it wouldn’t pass. Still, much of DC, unfamiliar with or just dismissive of the Constitution, pretend it’s binding and continue to throw our money at it. liar-nObama flushed $1 billion down the drain into the green climate slush fund it created in his last year squatting in the White House. It’s our money that goes to his corrupt UN globalist cronies...
.
Center for Security Policy's Jim Hanson speaks with Tucker Carlson about reports of rising crime by refugees in Germany
.
U.S. Military Identifies 'Mustard Agent' As Chemical Used by ISIS Against Iraqi Troops
.
Krauthammer on Coulter at Berkeley: "Reaching a Situation Where" "Fascist Gangs Can Shut Down Free Speech"
.
"This Madness Has to Stop": Hannity Says the Left Is Stifling Free Speech
.
White House: liar-nObama Administration Issued Flynn's Security Clearance
Elizabeth dinky-Warren "Troubled" by liar-nObama’s $400,000 Wall Street Speaking Fee
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The FBI and liar-Hillary, Again
p1KKkntn-5uDsTzY9CVxv3ja2f1pP1GEvgfVYhHtBsUhYRxIpJArdrlQQqZek9tWbx4eH7_e5SD72R8qqiB6RmJkFgVpVpDzWWh1F2uw2N7U9tnwgSq3Y5skJyCFWw-io1nOWPK3uUNDIRIQsUUbxRw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by Judge Andrew Napolitano
{
townhall.com} ~ Last weekend, The New York Times published a long piece about the effect the FBI had on the outcome of the 2016 presidential campaign. As we all know, Donald Trump won a comfortable victory in the Electoral College while falling about 3 million votes behind liar-Hillary Clinton in the popular vote.

I believe that liar-Clinton was a deeply flawed candidate who failed to energize the Democratic Party base and who failed to deliver to the electorate a principled reason to vote for her. Yet when the Times reporters asked her why she believes she lost the race, she gave several answers, the first of which was the involvement of the FBI. She may be right.

Here is the back story.

In 2015, a committee of the House of Representatives that was investigating the deaths of four Americans at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, learned that the State Department had no copies of any emails sent or received by liar-Clinton during her four years as secretary of state. When committee investigators pursued this -- at the same time that attorneys involved with civil lawsuits brought against the State Department seeking the liar-Clinton emails were pursuing it -- it was revealed that liar-Clinton had used her own home servers for her emails and bypassed the State Department servers.

Because many of her emails obviously contained government secrets and because the removal of government secrets to any non-secure venue constitutes espionage, the House Select Committee on Benghazi sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice, which passed it on to the FBI. A congressionally issued criminal referral means that some members of Congress who have seen some evidence think that some crime may have been committed. The DOJ is free to reject the referral, yet it accepted this one.

It directed the FBI to investigate the facts in the referral and to refer to the investigation as a "matter," not as a criminal investigation. The FBI cringed a bit, but Director James Comey followed orders and used the word "matter." This led to some agents mockingly referring to him as the director of the Federal Bureau of Matters. It would not be the last time agents mocked or derided him in the liar-Clinton investigation.

He should not have referred to it by any name, because under DOJ and FBI regulations, the existence of an FBI investigation should not be revealed publicly unless and until it results in some public courtroom activity, such as the release of an indictment. These rules and procedures have been in place for generations to protect those never charged. Because of the role that the FBI has played in our law enforcement history -- articulated in books and movies and manifested in our culture -- many folks assume that if a person is being investigated by the FBI, she must have done something wrong.

In early July 2016, liar-Clinton was personally interviewed in secret for about four hours by a team of FBI agents who had been working on her case for a year. During that interview, she professed great memory loss and blamed it on a head injury she said she had suffered in her Washington, D.C., home. Some of the agents who interrogated her disbelieved her testimony about the injury and, over the Fourth of July holiday weekend, asked Comey for permission to subpoena her medical records.

When Comey denied his agents the permission they sought, some of them attempted to obtain the records from the intelligence community. Because liar-Clinton's medical records had been digitally recorded by her physicians and because the FBI agents knew that the National Security Agency has digital copies of all keystrokes on all computers used in the U.S. since 2005, they sought liar-Clinton's records from their NSA colleagues. Lying to the FBI is a felony, and these agents believed they had just witnessed a series of lies.

When Comey learned what his creative agents were up to, he jumped the gun by holding a news conference on July 5, 2016, during which he announced that the FBI was recommending to the DOJ that it not seek liar-Clinton's indictment because "no reasonable prosecutor" would take the case. He then did the unthinkable. He outlined all of the damning evidence of guilt that the FBI had amassed against her.

This double-edged sword -- we won't charge her, but we have much evidence of her guilt -- was unprecedented and unheard of in the midst of a presidential election campaign. Both Republicans and Democrats found some joy in Comey's words. Yet his many agents who believed that liar-Clinton was guilty of both espionage and lying were furious -- furious that Comey had revealed so much, furious that he had demeaned their work, furious that he had stopped an investigation before it was completed.

While all this was going on, former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of liar-Clinton's closest aide, Huma Abedin, was being investigated for using a computer to send sexually explicit materials to a minor. When the FBI asked for his computer -- he had shared it with his wife -- he surrendered it. When FBI agents examined the Weiner/Abedin laptop, they found about 650,000 stored emails, many from liar-Clinton to Abedin, that they thought they had not seen before.

Rather than silently examine the laptop, Comey again violated DOJ and FBI regulations by announcing publicly the discovery of the laptop and revealing that his team suspected that it contained hundreds of thousands of liar-Clinton emails; and he announced the reopening of the liar-Clinton investigation. This announcement was made two weeks before Election Day and was greeted by the Trump campaign with great glee. A week later, Comey announced that the laptop was fruitless, and the investigation was closed, again.

At about the same time that the House Benghazi Committee sent its criminal referral to the DOJ, American and British intelligence became interested in a potential connection between the Trump presidential campaign and intelligence agents of the Russian government. This interest resulted in the now infamous year-plus-long electronic surveillance of Trump and many of his associates and colleagues. This also produced a criminal referral from the intelligence community to the DOJ, which sent it to the FBI.

Yet this referral and the existence of this investigation was kept -- quite properly -- from the press and the public. When Comey was asked about it, he -- quite properly -- declined to answer. When he was asked under oath whether he knew of any surveillance of Trump before Trump became president, Comey denied that he knew of it.

What was going on with the FBI?

How could Comey justify the public revelation of a criminal investigation and a summary of evidence of guilt about one candidate for president and remain silent about the existence of a criminal investigation of the campaign of another? How could he deny knowledge of surveillance that was well-known in the intelligence community, even among his own agents? Why would the FBI director inject his agents, who have prided themselves on professional political neutrality, into a bitterly contested campaign having been warned it might affect the outcome? Why did he reject the law's just commands of silence in favor of putting his thumb on political scales?

I don't know the answers to those questions. But the American public, and liar-Hillary Clinton, is entitled to them.
Read more…

Sat/Mid-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
 The March for Science Fiction
 By Louis DeBroux
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Wait, Tariffs Cost Consumers Money? 
HQqfOfrNdPa0NzMe9T9kUHt4IbNnmMwIb5FxYv2w7YcvyapxlxSvRWiJjz8Kr_8eGn6Szvh7Wv6c2MxyvEziXdzkoY4_PotVU7xNfotlxyYhVwvwxcpli23iP-MufA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
When Democrats propose health insurance mandates, or a carbon tax, or a higher gas tax, or energy regulations, or a minimum wage hike, or a tax increase on "the wealthy" (i.e., small business owners), or any number of other burdensome costs on the economy, the Leftmedia can only coo about how fair and good those things are. But when Donald Trump slaps a tariff on Canadian lumber, the Leftmedia blares headlines about how much it's going to cost American homebuilders — between $1,200 and $3,000 per house.
          Now, to be clear, they're not wrong about the cost, but these fair-weather free marketeers are profound hypocrites.
          Whenever you tax or regulate something, and a tariff is a tax, the price of that thing goes up and the consumer pays more. This is economics 101. Yet leftists only see this when Trump's at work.
          So what's going on here? First of all, Trump has long argued that NAFTA is a terrible trade deal for the U.S. and needs to be renegotiated. Without going through the whole history of that deal, suffice it to say that he has a point about other nations not always trading fairly — and there's definitely a difference between free and fair. For example, Canada and Mexico both subsidize goods more than the U.S. does, which undercuts American producers.
          In this case, Canadian lumber is subsidized, and it's a dispute that has been ongoing since the early 1980s. Trump's Commerce Department calculated its tariff rates on how much various Canadian lumber producers are subsidized. But the tariff also has to do with Canada's own tariffs on imported dairy products, which the Trump administration argues particularly hurts Wisconsin dairy farmers. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said, "The Trump administration has been much more focused on enforcement than had been true previously."
          And whether it's trade or immigration or foreign policy, Trump the dealmaker is all about sending signals that he means business. Yes, this lumber tariff will cost Americans money, and we're not arguing in favor of tariffs. But Trump has set about to seek what he believes are fair trade terms. Don't think Mexico and China aren't also getting the message.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-nObama Lied, Released Iranian
Nuke Traffickers Who Belonged In Gitmo
ck4t8HLp8_jctSTyXL_xKPW3AoxlNE9p2loL_zq_P-y0axS-f-7Tg0Ym_4cCajDNczzNmY_YcX8A0N-APRyp846XBuitU55EzY-fdlUGlshPz0tELNAdGqLhXx-YutpiLdI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Steve Doocy opens the discussion, asking if we remember when Hussein liar-nObama made one of his innumerable false promises, this one regarding the prisoners in the Iranian swap deal... liar-nObama said, “These individuals were not charged with terrorism, or any violent offenses, they’re civilians and their release is a one-time gesture to Iran, given the unique opportunity offered by this moment in the larger circumstances at play. He uses the words “not charged with terrorism” or any “violent” offenses in order to create the impression that they’re not dangerous or that their crimes are not serious. He asks us to let him make this one time, minor, insignificant offering to Iran to show them we’re good partners in his destructive, anti-American plotting. Ainsley Earhardt, not one for mincing words, describes the pretend ‘president’s’ comments, saying, “That is really not true. That turns out, what he was just saying – a total lie, and they were a potential threat, these individuals, to national security...http://rickwells.us/napolitano-obama-lied-released-iranian-nuke-traffickers-belonged-gitmo/
.
.Veteran faces 21 years in prison for
possession of pistol magazines
0mmP9g_cR0FWib84TDlsNj_IY21KnZUnL4mNBmNwR_0ZgPqN99iYhirGcgNz2wsgNcNY17bnTAO0hw9PZMkNGVwn6fAvFKujW2MjIdLnYZz5Gede5hV6e8m8mQyrX92NfNgWCML-1ocwtGVVs9Bfor3_URXwSaJzMkYUyQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Michael Filozof
{americanthinker.com} ~ Simeon D. Mokhiber, a Niagara Falls, N.Y. Army veteran, was convicted April 21 on three felony counts of possessing "large capacity ammunition feeding devices" under Gov. Andrew Cuomo's SAFE Act... Mokhiber served nine years in the U.S. Army and participated in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.  He subsequently worked as an armed private security contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan and was formerly licensed as an armed security guard in New York.  He is the father of an eight-year-old with disabilities and had no prior criminal record. Mokhiber was pulled over for speeding in April 2016.  Although Mokhiber had not been drinking, police performed field sobriety tests.  When Mokhiber requested that officers turn on body cameras, he was arrested, and his vehicle was searched without a warrant...This is insane. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/04/veteran_faces_21_years_in_prison_for_possession_of_pistol_magazines.html
.
Climate Hoax Swamp Creatures
Pitch Profiteering, Wealth Redistribution...
-_JER1XvBMl_lw9sNS6l7Qy0SUQL5dc5X9As0uEx93K97iAqVguTicfW9Tw3v9vY1OxiEA9iS69CEXita5Yacv3txkctmvgaGVZei1J3ykHkPcmN4xw3f7Ji8mPFHg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ It is beginning to appear that decisions were made, contrary to the will of the American people, when a collection of exploitative charlatans were entertained on February 8th by President Trump’s top economic adviser, Gary Cohn... Swamp scum is increasingly becoming a common sight at the White House. Some of it, like former Goldman Sachs Partner Cohn, has even “taken root.”, Why are these crooked fat cats being allowed on property, let alone to make their presentation for the fleecing of the American people once again? They made the arguments we’ve heard so often before, the ones we thought we were free of under President Trump. The economic suicide of remaining in and becoming active participants in the Climate Hoax agreement is now being revived by the establishment swamp vermin who have been allowed into and are becoming part of, the Trump administration. They have to be stopped and the question that should be on everybody’s lips is “Why?”...http://rickwells.us/climate-hoax-swamp-creatures-pitch-profiteering-wealth-redistribution-carbon-tax-white-house/
.
Where Are the Moderate Muslims?
AVx4SMuEv_eGDX322xLtCNl94YbKxCMTKcswk9GFeOaMjfvzvqb_9u0g_2wciocpY4H0pP4UZnJlPv_GZlRm2CdWJ3R-fpDVrJy44ZOlfRD2f6uwqLIzgvJpJWsuFjGmZyjqQRt8HA2IyLEWs-61kEsUhM_NdQt32O7ojaM9Nj1BkOr2OwhWE1xRoOnl-4SolEdpsy0F7ToT5OsJi6QgkpHNHTPW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Truth Revolt
{truthrevolt.org} ~ After every new Jihadist attack against the West, politicians reassure us that the atrocity does not represent the true nature of mainstream Islam... Of the 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, they constantly reassure us, the overwhelming majority are as law abiding as any members of any other monotheistic faith. Only a tiny fraction engage in terror. And Islam is a religion of peace. Furthermore, we are told, the great majority of Muslims hold moderate views. But what does that mean? How moderate are moderate Muslims? Given the threat of radical Islam, it would seem to be a fair question. Let me start to answer it by telling you something of my own story...http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/prager-u-where-are-moderate-muslims
.
 
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 The March for Science Fiction 
DGwWdzCK6CNIBPZeL_JkTiyDS7PKxQi3lz28NAUxv_i47grXBq7oIUt6D4sfmuxhmZEOgAoDT1GStwWMt0JTStaPTrAbrc74wlnOtFO_vHXVxQQVqvm9kBlmlCVD0g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Louis DeBroux: One of the asinine yet oft-repeated phrases in the modern progressive lexicon is "settled science," an oxymoron that is the antithesis of the scientific method. The literal definition of the scientific method is "a method of procedure ... consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses." Modification means alteration or change. Meaning that in science, many, many things are never "settled."
          Among the most well-known theories that have been debunked over time are that the world is flat, that the universe is geocentric (it is heliocentric), that the physical world is made up of four elements (rather than more than a hundred currently known elements, including four new elements discovered just last year), and that atoms are the smallest units of matter. Each and every one of these was once universally accepted as infallible truth.
          This makes the recent "March for Science" in Washington, DC, not only ludicrous, but an indictment of those marching while claiming to believe in science. It was not about science, but about publicly rebuking President Donald Trump behind the thin patina of ideology masquerading as science. The leftist mainstream media played its part well, praising the event while ignoring dissent from actual scientists.
          With scathing wit, Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and a clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School, exposed the hypocrisy and lunacy of the march — in the lefty rag Slate, no less. He observed, "Being 'pro-science' has become a bizarre cultural phenomenon in which liberals (and other members of the cultural elite) engage in public displays of self-reckoned intelligence as a kind of performance art, while demonstrating zero evidence to justify it."
          Instead of elevating the quality of, and respect for, actual science, says Faust, this march "revealed the glaring dissonance of opposing that trough of ignorance by instead accepting a cringe-worthy hive-mind mentality that celebrates Science as a vague but wonderful entity. ... There was an uncomfortable dronelike fealty to the concept — an oxymoronic faith that information presented and packaged to us as Science need not be further scrutinized before being smugly celebrated en masse. That is not intellectually rigorous thought — instead, it's another kind of religion."
          Indeed, progressive Democrats claim to be the "Party of Science" yet, mind-bogglingly argue that sex/gender is determined by how one "feels" rather than by DNA and plumbing. They accept man-made global warming (now known as "climate change" to free themselves of the pesky fact that the Earth stopped warming for nearly two decades) as inarguable fact. These are the same people who chain themselves to trees to protest the "destruction" of Mother Earth, but refuse to acknowledge that a baby in utero is a living human being.
          In short, they are modern-day pagans, worshipping "Gaia" while denying observable truths that conflict with their secular religion, and seeking punishment for the heretics who dare challenge their belief system with something so coarse, so crude and as unenlightened as mere facts.
          The ultimate goal of the progressive religionists is to force compliance with their worldview, either through the coercive power of rigid, politically correct orthodoxy, or through punishment such as jail time for "climate change dissenters/deniers," a position embraced by leftist celebrity and fake TV scientist Bill Nye "The Science Guy."
          CNN, in an interview with Nye and an actual scientist, physicist William Happer of Princeton, inadvertently displayed the truth behind the march with a caption that read "March for Science: Scientists Rally for EPA, Govt Funding and More." Climate change hysteria is a big business. If you are a scientist, you have access to billions of dollars in federal grants so long as you produce "research" that proves the claims of the alarmists. Politicians pushing climate hysteria can usurp tremendous power over the lives of hundreds of millions of people in the name of saving the world from cataclysmic disaster.
          The reality is that "science," across a broad spectrum of disciplines, is not nearly as "settled" as its advocates would have us believe. In fact, the most-repeated claims have a habit of turning out to be spectacularly wrong. For example, as we've noted previously, leftist climate alarmists have been trying to scare us into giving up the abundant energy and higher standard of living that comes with industrialization. They warned that "civilization will end within 15 or 30 years" (Harvard biologist George Wald, 1970), and that (due to scarce food supplies), "The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years" (Paul Ehrlich, 1970), and that by 1980 "urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution."
          They are often insanely wrong in their predictions, and are so wedded to their ideology that they can't even identify fake science even when it is specifically written to be obviously wrong. Time after time, robotically generated "gibberish papers" were accepted in supposedly peer-reviewed journals.
          As amusing as this can be, it's actually dangerous. The beauty of science is that it is ruthless. It cares not for sex, race, education or socio-economic status. It cares only about replicable fact. But when science — actual science — is hijacked by partisans and ideologues, and propaganda is passed off as science, it undermines our faith in science, and therefore the truth.
          And that is never a good thing.  ~The Patriot Post
Read more…

Saturday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Low-cut tops, sexual harassment
and Bill O'Reilly
msSN11H3NQOY9bUwTgwQrr3bbCGpxdpo1_JD3pV50SxOKoyEZq4G-6hkxsJD69z-vJs3JhqpP_K21V6K1yPWk08Zy0NjGsufH08kpxIkBA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Minister Michael Brown
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Top Headlines 
lbcpnGutU7GfZhEV3CXj7YRDjO_5mSFiMyKMkrQ3txHwxq8KISm3uqdtXci6EH1xg8To9vS5M1hd-5_4k9L2u2CSG-CDrCE-tp789pE_UYJdeg_-d1TNu-PPE_PjFQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
House GOP unveils bill extending government shutdown deadline a week. (CBS News)
 
Trump tells Mexico, Canada he won't terminate NAFTA "at this time." (The Hill)
 
FCC begins process to rollback net neutrality rules. (NPR)
 
ESPN layoffs should be a wake-up call about politicizing sports. (National Review)
 
ESPN publishes poetry tribute to fugitive cop killer. (The Federalist)
 
Ann Coulter cancels Berkeley speech after losing conservative groups' support. (USA Today)
 
University of California President Janet Napolitano hid $175 million while raising tuition, paying excessive salaries. (Hot Air)
 
New CMP video: Planned Parenthood executive haggles over compensation for organ sales ... again. (Hot Air)
 
Senators told North Korea nuclear threat is urgent. (The Washington Free Beacon)
 
U.S. military begins installation of missile defenses in South Korea. (ABC News)
 
Policy: House health care bill is moving in the right direction. (The Daily Signal)
 
Policy: Energy revolutions hidden in plain sight: shale crushes solar. (Real Clear Energy~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Sharia, Arkansas Style
oJHCiMCO-5lBdmpRgyxsENFLvGqFbL0YYIXj45I6wrgmBoSAap1dyaCEdwRUHhQx9VCB7KNUcrFdyqUeQ1iB2LzYLeSZjgGqxHMK0RitskFB0vtpffj1UTwUNgVVmaPoSJMcw2t9qMqRvu50W7O_C6HMWM2lerO2vD6ywY6mALHYqgKOI-w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Bruce Bawer 
{frontpagemag.com} ~ On April 13-15, the King Fahd Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Arkansas held a symposium on so-called “honor violence,” as exemplified by honor killings, forced marriage, and other such delightful acts... I'll get back to this – but first of all, am I the only person who still finds it jarring to see words like “King Fahd Center for Middle East Studies” in the same sentence as words like “University of Arkansas”? The Center, as its website informs us, “was founded with a $20 million endowment from the Saudi government in the mid-1990s.  An initial endowment of $2 million, dedicated toward language, literary translation and publication was followed by a much larger $18 million gift designed to spark the foundation of a comprehensive Middle East Studies program at the undergraduate and graduate levels.” Of course, this isn't the only so-called “Middle East Studies” shebang based at a Western university, named for a Saudi royal, and funded by Saudi cash...

.

Former liar-nObama
DHS Secretary Napolitano Busted...
5Bl-GHy8jKCVZUPBtqR4AF2u_jIC1_7cy9WyCSLnTW_v30nLd5cGOl0-fxylUojLCYvQXxtj3RXIsuP_ZLQAanAzh4tJzpUX9cUKte3ZPV7ppOYOQFbizj_LMloma4XZQ67vz-K9d9oIXYA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ liar-nObama’s former Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, provided some insight into the corruption that permeates her management style at the University of California... and which was surely covered up by the her equally corrupt comrades within the liar-nObama regime. An audit of the University of California reveals that Napolitano had a hidden “rainy day fund” stashed that nobody was supposed to find out about, to the tune of $175 million. The secret fund existed at the same time that the University system was claiming to be in dire financial straits and requesting a funding increase. The means by which the surplus was accumulated was deceptive as well, with Napolitano overestimating the amount of money needed to run the school system...

.

Sean Spicer: Sanctuary Cities "Have the Blood of Dead Americans on Their Hands"VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFXVu_qE-PI

TUCKER: Spars With Democrat Over Iran Deal - "You Were Hoodwinked"
VIDEO:  http://video.insider.foxnews.com/v/5411259999001
.
RUSH: Federal Judge Had To "INVENT A VIOLATION" To Make Trump Look Like A Tyrannical Dictator (Sanctuary Cities)
VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgwFxq2uB0w
.
Ann Coulter: Colleges Like Berkeley Want to "Squelch" Conservative Speech
VIDEO:  http://video.insider.foxnews.com/v/5412805532001
 
The Most Anti-Trump Anchor on TV News
.
European Union Regulation of Internet
Speech Demonstrates Its Secular Trend
iWlp6Ek2RkkzmzVYoNCWVDE9FmkarPzOSjUtKPSL-I7MLUnmN1X2gOqs3PAZPlESsgvqYZq91b0SQpUjeIvBoeBTOgqtdyiRJtE50DOfxdIyh4ZcbxYV6rE1kNmbzaNr_dyv4MUHOxqSXjVVUjAdSA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Steve Byas
{thenewamerican.com} ~ The European Parliament (EP) voted earlier this week to increase regulation of speech on the Internet, specifically targeting Google’s YouTube and Vimeo — platforms in which average citizens can share videos... The EP, the legislative body of the European Union (EU), has decided that some videos do not meet their standards. The EP said it wants to protect its citizens from videos that use so-called hate speech and incitement to violence. While one can certainly understand a desire to curb incitement to violence, it is important to define what this actually means in practice. Perhaps of even greater concern is the prohibition against “hate speech,” which some in America have sarcastically defined as “speech that someone hates.” Opponents of “hate speech” usually define it as any speech that denigrates members of certain groups, based on subjects such as race or religion, or even "sexual orientation.”...
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Low-cut tops, sexual harassment
and Bill O'Reilly
msSN11H3NQOY9bUwTgwQrr3bbCGpxdpo1_JD3pV50SxOKoyEZq4G-6hkxsJD69z-vJs3JhqpP_K21V6K1yPWk08Zy0NjGsufH08kpxIkBA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Minister Michael Brown
{wnd.com} ~ I’m not defending or accusing Bill O’Reilly, and I don’t know if his antagonists are telling the truth. I’m simply asking a question: If a woman wears a low-cut top to work and a male colleague or employer looks at her cleavage, is that sexual harassment?

I asked my Twitter followers this question, and the responses were somewhat surprising. But before I share what they had to say, let me start with the appropriate caveats.

I'm not denying the reality of sexual harassment in the workplace.

I’m not denying that some men feel they have the right to treat women as sexual objects.

I’m not denying that many women feel constant pressure to dress sensually.

I’m not denying that some judges have outrageously implied that rape victims got what they deserved because of their scanty attire.

I’m not questioning or minimizing or excusing any of this. Not a chance.

What I’m questioning is whether it’s sexual harassment if a woman wears suggestive attire and a man checks her out. Is she getting the desired results – namely, male attention – or is this a form of sexual harassment?

Again, I’m not justifying the man’s behavior or the woman’s attire. As a follower of Jesus, I do my best to look away from temptation, not toward it. And my wife and I taught our daughters never to dress in such a way as to appeal to male lusts.

But if a woman comes to work in a very tight, very short mini-skirt and some male coworker checks out her legs, is he guilty of sexual harassment? Or, more generally, if he says to her, “That’s a nice outfit!” has he sexually harassed her?

Perquita Burgess, one of O’Reilly’s accusers, claimed he “would come by her desk and would leer at her up and down. She felt like he was looking at her cleavage, and it made her feel uncomfortable.”

If true, was this harassment? Perhaps it’s one thing to glance and another thing to leer? Or was she displaying her cleavage for all to see? I’m simply asking questions.

She also claimed that “O’Reilly told her ‘lookin’ good there girl’ one time when she was getting off the elevator.”

What about this behavior? Can a friendly compliment be construed as sexual harassment unless it was part of a larger complex of inappropriate comments? Or is this just one more exaggerated reaction from our hyper-PC culture in which almost everything is construed to be sexist or racist?

Remember that one campus listed complimentary comments to women such as, “I love your shoes!” as gender microagressions, since it would suggest that females had nothing to offer other than nice attire.

Getting back to my Twitter poll, I asked, “If a woman wears a low-cut top to work, is it sexual harassment if a man checks her out?”

The four possible responses were: Yes (I’m female); No (I’m female); Yes (I’m male); No (I’m male).

My Twitter followers seem to be about two-thirds male in contrast with my Facebook followers, who are about 55 percent female, especially in the older age groups. So the responses to my poll were in keeping with the demographics, with men representing 68 percent of the responders and women 32 percent.

Interestingly, 81 percent of those responding answered with No. And check this out: The percentage of women answering No was virtually identical to that of men who answered No. How striking! To be exact, of the 32 percent of women responding, 6 percent answered Yes, and 26 percent No; of the 68 percent of men responding, 13 percent answered Yes, and 55 percent No.

So, not only did the vast majority of my respondents believe that this was not sexual harassment, but the women and men agreed.

One woman tweeted back to me: “That’s why women wear revealing stuff, whether they admit or not … so men will look at them.”

Another woman tweeted: Totally agree. Females who say otherwise are dishonest. A person w/positive self-concept won’t dress immodestly to get attention. Conversely, a female doesn’t accidentally put a top on so her action hangs out. … It’s on PURPOSE! I see it on campus. Shorts so one literally sees the you know what. I find it repulsive not to mention unsanitary. Totally unnecessary!”

Yet another woman added: “Women should respect themselves more if they want to be respected!!!”

And another: “Touching is obviously a no no. But why not dress modestly at work? I don’t mean up to the chin, but not so low. Or tight. Show respect.”

And one more: “If a woman displays herself are men expected to NOT look?”

(Remember: These were all women expressing these views.)

One man did feel that to check the woman out was harassment. But, he added, “do women have a responsibility of addressing themselves properly? Men are visual. Let’s be real.”

Not all, however, agreed.

One woman wrote: “Next step: ‘Please wear a burka because it’s your responsibility if I find you attractive and can’t rule myself.'”

Interestingly, when I clicked on the bio of this tweeter, her description was short and to the point: “Liberal and atheist.” Perhaps her response is not so surprising.

From the totally opposite perspective, one man asked: “I’d also like to know how many men feel uncomfortable when a woman wears a ‘low-cut top’ to work? Isn’t that sexual harassment?”

Who wants to open that can of worms?

All this being said, I trust we agree that: 1) making a woman feel uncomfortable because of her looks is inappropriate; 2) our airbrushed, super-model culture puts women under extra pressure to present themselves a certain way; 3) and men can sometimes act like male animals chasing a female dog in heat.

But is it sexual harassment if a man compliments a female coworker’s attire in non-lewd terms? Or is it sexual harassment if a man’s eyes are drawn to a female coworker’s highly accentuated areas? I think not.

What do you think?
Read more…

Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The world learns: Socialism sucks
pjs7qG1me52znO9JEbLTdeeJJgOK5216ReKhRvpGRfX5VAiKsBO7hf06gc20s3fXMsSwFvbl8-z5BSG9dM0ml5VVAjeTU6hhhfYj=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Erik Rush
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 liar-nObama Lackey Blocks Trump ...or Does He? 
xWn-VxrKTC62t3GrhstRjQDysF37yPMzrNGe6JZ71UXyp3mJwv1ecXRACVdkXYw0A-Df6aqIPO0clyMRzD4rlAU5jouagISbwgMKCG_caXaMauMys1El-7_U6-h1TA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Just when you think judicial activism can't get any more bizarre, in comes U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick. Yesterday, Judge Orrick — who, by the way, targeted the noble work of the pro-life group Center for Medical Progress and also helped funnel almost a quarter-million dollars to Barack liar-nObama and his lemmings — issued a provisional injunction against defunding so-called sanctuary cities. For now, the ruling protects the nine lawless jurisdictions that are being threatened with imminent Justice Department sanctions. But the details of the case and the court's reasoning are almost surreal.
          The injunction pertains to a January executive order (and this is the key). According to Judge Orrick, "The President has called it 'a weapon' to use against jurisdictions that disagree with his preferred policies of immigration enforcement, and his press secretary has reiterated that the President intends to ensure that 'counties and other institutions that remain sanctuary cites don't get federal government funding in compliance with the executive order.' The Attorney General has warned that jurisdictions that do not comply with Section 1373 would suffer 'withholding grants, termination of grants, and disbarment or ineligibility for future grants,' and the 'claw back' of any funds previously awarded."
          But then Judge Orrick goes on to argue, "That said, this injunction does nothing more than implement the effect of the Government's flawed interpretation of the Order. It does not affect the ability of the Attorney General or the Secretary to enforce existing conditions of federal grants or 8 U.S.C. 1373, nor does it impact the Secretary's ability to develop regulations or other guidance defining what a sanctuary jurisdiction is or designating a jurisdiction as such. It does prohibit the Government from exercising 9(a) in a way that violates the Constitution."
          So the executive order is void, but Sessions is also being allowed to carry on. Huh? In essence, the judge wrongly contends that Trump intended to completely defund sanctuary cities. Legally, the defunding measures are relegated to three grants. So the question is: What was the administration's motive? For the answer, let's look at what Trump's original executive order actually said: "[T]he Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary." Notice the phrase "consistent with law." The judge is inaccurately surmising things from Trump's admittedly lose mouth despite what the text actually says.
          To be fair, the executive order was unnecessary legally. Why executively execute something that's already legal? The message it sent, on the other hand, was needed. On the flip side, the courts hijacked the order by pretending it's something it's clearly not. Politico called it "another high-profile blow to Trump's efforts to use executive orders to carry out major policy moves." Except it's not. The Leftmedia is sensationalizing yesterday's news even though it literally changes nothing. As David French put it, "Trump isn't blocked from enforcing existing law. He's only blocked from engaging in illegal acts that the DOJ promised the court that it wasn't considering. In other words, move along. There's not much to see here."
          Unfortunately, extreme judicial activism and Leftmedia hyperbole will be the modus operandi for the next four years. On the positive side, it's impossible to overstate just how important it was to get Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court. Because that's ultimately where sanity will (we hope) prevail. 
~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
California Testing Boundaries Of Anarchy,
Corruption Everywhere You Turn
JqhoJPdRT3fK21jii7OzxjESFYKrIz_VYEYEEEnuXyhyX45Gq35tUugVplivbReNEdqqjHPvynUl7lwjJa76ujq6ElZ-dldNC8W8umJKfbz2kzVQfkpkdbhL2RHQ5Y-s1PsXEZ3b=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=>
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs has a few thoughts “on the all but perfect laboratory for left-wing ideological experimentation and deep-state subversion... The fertile venue to watch what happens when government works against its residents, its citizens, when local and state governments battle the Trump administration and our nation’s federal laws.” Dobbs alleviates the low level suspense with an admission of, “Of course, I’m talking about California.” Dobbs reassures his audience, saying, “No, California hasn’t yet seceded, but many Californians are acting as if it had left the union.” Dobbs notes, “They want California to become the nation’s first sanctuary state if they can’t secede and the California legislature has even hired former Attorney General Eric Holder to be their point man for legal battles with the Trump administration. And of course, San Francisco is the home of the 9th Circuit, the left-most appellate court in the country, the most reversed court in all the land.”...http://rickwells.us/dobbs-california-testing-boundaries-of-anarchy-corruption-everywhere-you-turn/
.
East Asia Nuclear Roulette
B8KUxrMLdwnoQRHrU6PwsJuinU_aTmcxbi5nz_nlbYxB27t4ASTidaoaRTog_tvK18sxU1oWN9rxPOg6aCnFEoyh30zA2gEr0UFPxd4LxmvvrFzAL4FVvmmmPXNA7pXFy5OC5sCJZTyznRUpi85kqOfYPdbVvA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Stephen Lendman
{thesleuthjournal.com} ~ The UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) warned about possible nuclear war, by design or accident, calling the risk highest since the end of the Cold War... Nine nations have nukes: America, Russia, China, Britain, France, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea. Given heightened world tensions, especially in East Asia, the Middle East, and US hostility toward multiple countries, possible nuclear war may be inevitable, perhaps just a matter of time. In 1982 testimony before Congress, founder of America’s nuclear navy Admiral Hyman Rickover said “the lesson of history is when a war starts, every nation will ultimately use whatever weapons it has available.”...http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/east-asia-nuclear-roulette/
.
Why This Judge’s Ruling Won’t Block
Federal Action on Sanctuary Cities
Ssyf_Oqd7ApTtdcYmTtGo-LGm_wUpx2TJNJYISinrBSwlRhR39pZ-y-TxU6JiXYpLyM1xdIm8YaH4xnkJIUK9Q0JEjzk3ikkjMLgTkrVEKGnvPccsElY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Hans von Spakovsky
{dailysignal.com} ~ Media sources are all breathlessly reporting that the Trump administration’s proposed termination of federal funding to sanctuary cities has been enjoined by a federal judge... But that is misleading, and the media is misinterpreting the injunction order in the same way the federal judge misinterpreted President Donald Trump’s executive order. At issue in the lawsuit filed in San Francisco federal court by Santa Clara County and San Francisco was Section 9 of Executive Order 13768, “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States.” If you read all of the news accounts, as well as the order of Judge William Orrick (an liar-nObama appointee), you would think that Trump ordered the cutoff of all federal funding to sanctuary cities, from basic federal entitlement payments like Medicaid to discretionary grants... http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/26/why-this-judges-ruling-wont-block-federal-action-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTURNMU0yRTJPRE01T0RObSIsInQiOiJiY1FzeEZ6Y2R0elJWTVZGXC8xampMTmNYc0w3QWJwbllVTStVN3hCTHVtVWxkbEdHbzhsbUJCd2h2VTFRR2g2XC9mMHZQajJRcEFYU0ZqMDdyeW1uM21Ea2I0MFwvcmhocHFxbFFMNmhvbWdwU053Mko3YmJcL1owUzVPQUdic2Z0YysifQ%3D%3D  
.
Only 2 House Dems Have Examined
Those Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Docs
ZYorP1J_-kIt0kGcsJVSN6oXYxdjcHLYD2ILAg6SFGItZjMF-TmQSWW3lZJF46EqD6QNGQeu9zz_2k7ncP0lY-jJY9uOhD3tIXIcbptNolsl_Izw4akt6iku69lEfzFt14TA3gn6K0MwBUHnR2IkvbIlLhIK8DIsAocBEEbx2a2Dk5eh7kuUpnwhoj8J_r8SK7agMVKWfbGFb59071_M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Richard Pollock
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group has learned. The apparent lack of interest among the remaining seven Democrats on the intelligence panel is in striking contrast to their earlier vocal demands that they see the documents after committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes disclosed he had read them at the White House complex. According to a source with knowledge of congressional visits to the National Security Agency, the classified documents have been available to committee members for three weeks, but Himes and Schiff are the lone Democrats to review them...All those dems need to be replaced, even Schiff. http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/26/exclusive-only-2-house-dems-have-examined-those-susan-rice-unmasking-docs/
.
Palestinians: This is How We Intimidate Journalists
FdQD4TDMuZlWOtuAKQ20HpSHm1M1m8EdvsZPyb2c-W8a7rZRa1XMPhaZafnRna9ZhahoSkbb8_dSYQ8epy4yraG9v354Sw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Palestinian Authority police assault journalists at a protest in Ramallah
by Bassam Tawil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Seven Palestinian journalists are the latest victims of the Palestinian Authority's (PA) continued crackdown on the media... The repressive measures are aimed at silencing critical voices among the journalists and deterring others from reporting stories that reflect negatively on the Palestinian leadership in particular and Palestinians in general. In the view of President Mahmoud Abbas and his PA, Palestinian journalists exist to write stories slamming Israel or praising PA leaders. Media, for them, is defined as a mouthpiece for Abbas, the PA leadership and the Palestinian cause. Any journalist who dares to think outside this checkpoint is subject to severe punishment. Under Abbas and the PA, there is no room for an independent media... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10116/palestinians-journalists-intimidation
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The world learns: Socialism sucks
pjs7qG1me52znO9JEbLTdeeJJgOK5216ReKhRvpGRfX5VAiKsBO7hf06gc20s3fXMsSwFvbl8-z5BSG9dM0ml5VVAjeTU6hhhfYj=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Erik Rush
{wnd.com} ~ Recently, I heard popular host Glenn Beck state that he had eliminated the word “evil” from his vocabulary, the rationale being that he believed it would thwart efforts for conservatives to “come together” with their political opponents to solve the problems facing our nation.

I acknowledge the fact that Beck has done a lot over the years toward educating his audience concerning the machinations of global socialists, first on Fox News television and later through his online network, The Blaze. However, as I’ve indicated previously, sometimes the host goes too far in his self-styled Mormon flower-child modality with regard to the reality of dealing with said political opponents, their ruthlessness, lack of ethics and intractability.

Even though it has not always been a pervasive belief among Western Christians, as a Christian, I can certainly concur with Beck’s belief that love is the highest ideal a person can have. That said, notions of brotherly love and “coming together” are naïve at best when it comes to political opponents who are wholly dedicated to eradicating an opponent’s system of belief, governance or population, whether by attrition or by the sword.

Typically, this sort of political opponent is referred to as an “enemy.”

The half-billion people murdered, maimed and enslaved by socialists of varied stripes during the last century ought to be sufficient proof of their ruthlessness, lack of ethics and intractability. Likewise, Islam’s 1,400 years of blind zealotry, as well as the murder and mayhem perpetrated by Islamists during that time to say nothing of the same perpetrated by Islamists over the last couple of decades alone ought to be sufficient proof of their inability to come to accords with their opponents.

Over the last couple of years, we have seen key indicators that citizens of Western nations who’ve had socialism and its attendant social engineering devices rammed down their throats over the last 50 years have had enough.

With regard to immigration, for example: Europe is obviously further along than America with respect to the machinations of international socialist politicos. Now, we are seeing a strong response to the doctrine of European leaders having welcomed millions of individuals from culturally bankrupt nations over the last 50 years. Those who have refused to assimilate and treat the largesse of Europeans as their birthright have become a poisonous, indigestible mass in the European body politic.

This isn’t an instance of Westerners being bigoted, creepy Christian dogmatists, particularly in the case of Europeans. Europe accounted for 66.3 percent of the world’s Christian population in 1910. Today, it represents 25.9 percent. The proportion of European Christians has dropped from 94.5 percent of the population to 76.2 percent in 100 years.

Over time, Westerners, whether Europeans, Canadians or Americans, have begun to find the insidious aspects of socialism that were dramatically misrepresented to them by politicians, akin to having ingested spoiled food. One doesn’t get sick right away, but when it sets in, it’s something one never forgets.

These people are not ideological conservatives either, nor have they identified socialism as the name of their pain – yet. They just know that their paychecks don’t go nearly as far as they used to, they’re far less safe, their entertainment media has become shameless left-wing propaganda, and their children are being indoctrinated in school rather than educated.

Other than the election of Donald Trump to the presidency the most notable byproduct of this phenomenon, there are myriad examples of plain folk expressing their disgust with socialist encroachment. Brexit, the United Kingdom’s effort to extricate itself from the European Union is certainly one of these. Citizens’ expulsion of their government in Iceland a few years ago is another.

In the corporate world, the shrinking coffers of the NFL and ESPN followed those companies’ tolerance of anti-American expression among certain pro football players and sportscasters, respectively. Big-box giant Target is currently hemorrhaging top executives and cash, the result of that organization becoming a corporate activist for the homosexual agenda.

It was one thing for Westerners to view from afar the desolation of Soviet Russia, Cuba and other nations that went socialist during the last century, or to muse over oil-rich Venezuela being flat broke due to hard-line socialist policies – but the foregoing declines have struck too close to home for comfort.

With regard to the opening paragraphs and concepts of evil and enmity: Most people can recognize evil when they see it; obviously, this holds true even among societies in which leftist moral relativism abounds. There is a danger to the excising and modification of language in that it smacks of the Orwellian – the politically correct moral relativism, social engineering and borderline mind control so often employed by socialists. They’ve even gone so far as to modify or negate such terms as “good” and “evil” to advance amorality and secure political gains.

Increasing numbers of those who have known liberty under Western constitutions and democratic republics are coming to realize that a chief consequence of this strategy has been an erosion of their liberties and a decline in their quality of life – which I suppose breathes new life into the axiom referencing not being able to fool all of the people all of the time.
Read more…

Fri/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
On Course, Underground, Uninspected
by Clare Lopez
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Judicial Watch On Rice Hearings,
Soros Sucking Taxpayer Millions
PvKc4iXLV8zZVqohSHxQ1lPe-Cs_HsBrFbb91bYduRh5h9zpYALVvNWox0FDyT-7qBOuFOyII02vA1KpdZ2YbAwM7JrK7c10MQgh8lzuS8emwVU6asz8NGCdNeOcdJDw3NOo1g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Chris Farrell, the Director of Research and Investigations for Judicial Watch, joined Lou Dobbs for an update of their legal actions, starting off with an investigation into $5million of taxpayer money that went to George Soros... laundered through USAID under the US State Department. He notes it was “To basically use Saul Alinsky tactics to knock out the duly and rightly elected center-right government in Macedonia.” Farrell continues, “And so they did things like translate Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals into Macedonian, and they’re training youth to go out on the street and protest.” He clarifies, “USAID is funding an Open Society Foundation arm, a Soros operation.” Dobbs interjects, “Which are always political arms.” Farrell replies, “Correct, in Macedonia, using our tax dollars.” Dobbs mockingly says, “Well, I’m surprised the left isn’t all over this because this would be interference in an election by George Soros and his open society...http://rickwells.us/lou-dobbs-judicial-watch-rice-hearings-soros-sucking-taxpayer-millions/
.
Trump agrees to renegotiate NAFTA
with Canada, Mexico – for now
{foxnews.com} ~ President Trump and the leaders of Mexico and Canada agreed Wednesday to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the White House said... though Trump warned Thursday he’d be willing to “terminate” the pact if they can’t strike a “fair deal.” "It is my privilege to bring NAFTA up to date through renegotiation," Trump said in a statement late Wednesday. "It is an honor to deal with both Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and I believe that the end result will make all three countries stronger and better." The White House added that Trump "agreed not to terminate NAFTA at this time" and that all three leaders ""agreed to proceed swiftly, according to their required internal procedures, to enable the renegotiation" of the trade deal to "the benefit of all three countries."... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/27/trump-agrees-to-renegotiate-nafta-with-canada-mexico-leaders.html
.
Ivy League Schools Did Not Disclose
$246 MILLION in Taxpayer Funding
lbUpzn0x5buTVvHN_1_PS_cPyqBIgMoQn6MX8vU-PcTY8ZTGFYNbGQEUIQM65-aGES_saSMrlVo2ATEfuT2ltvdDm3aDHnt0Jo7zeruddUo19_LzgVXIJaNTujx81xaboA95oz7ZNUDnX3_CRbkshlmB1TKG8jfZgk5W2L5Z3h56mVQWrOlhaa5swSk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Pamela Geller
{pamelageller.com} ~ An analysis of over $200 million in research projects conducted by Ivy League institutions found that none disclosed how they spent taxpayer dollars, in violation of federal law... Senators are now asking the Government Accountability Office to investigate how many federally funded projects are not standing the scrutiny of how taxpayer dollars are spent. The report conducted by White Coat Waste Project, a bipartisan organization seeking an end to taxpayer-funded animal experiments, and co-authored by Restore Accountability, identified 100 National Institutes of Health studies that did not disclose funding in press releases. The nondisclosure violates the Stevens Amendment, a three decades-old transparency rule. White Coat Waste found “widespread transparency failures by Ivy League universities receiving more than $2 billion annually from the National Institutes of Health,” according to the report... http://pamelageller.com/2017/04/ivy-schools-taxpayer.html/
.
Huma Abedin's family under federal investigation
SG02pasq2jmeQhwvb1ikudfw9ZggDsu9HJDt4uW6m2lyhXzfqfSkngv9TAaZxBV0_Zu1GXP1lxJZ0i_c8-wkLndCQRiMT8w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Sperry
{wnd.com} ~ While liar-Hillary Clinton loyal aide Huma Abedin was reportedly sidelined in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential campaign as a result of Abedin’s husband’s child-porn scandal, she was potentially an even greater liability than known... It turns out Anthony Weiner wasn’t the only family member under investigation. In fact, the U.S. Justice Department has been actively prosecuting two other Abedin family members – for conspiracy, wire fraud and securities fraud – and she along with the State Department, where she previously worked for liar-Clinton, are mentioned in the federal case, court records show. Other documents reveal the same allegedly crooked kin solicited Abedin for help at State in a deal that netted more than $1.2 million in federal grants...
.
China warns Kim Jong-un Pyongyang faces 'GREAT LOSSES' if North Korea tests another nuke
VzZKrnXF9EW8KVoeKoCCzlyZIJ2g6aNW65C1BEOnwrfEgAGkfjmFQ2hOUDbYS7mm4nYnH4rJy0SXPb4qmJOdMtqx3uVsnwHJXyLd6o6M-zmbav6-syoPWijj5vQHHp35Yp2ouHfv22GSVRDTeF4Rcyei-SNV1LQekZc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Patrick Christys
{express.co.uk} ~ The Chinese government have also warned that should war break out, it would be Pyongyang that would suffer most... Xi Jinping’s powerhouse is clearly worried about nuclear war breaking out in the region, pleading with Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un to behave with restraint. An editorial piece in the Global Times, widely regarded as the mouthpiece of the Communist Party, said: “The game of chicken between Washington and Pyongyang has come to a breaking point.”...http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/796394/North-Korea-Kim-Jong-un-Donald-Trump-America-China-Xi-Jinping-nuclear-war
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
On Course, Underground, Uninspected
1SnZlDS5DBPaKYTd3XukhD8qDiB2_KO3I2LiTWc4nI2BfRw_S9hlHhR-VDdVG8EncTrrD0dj7T0QIHAiUvAg2H9V658jzgKlIYY7UjK7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Clare Lopez
{aim.org} ~
The Iranian regime’s nuclear weapons program, born in secrecy and kept hidden for years, has never skipped a beat and today continues on course in underground and military facilities to which inspectors have no access. On 21 April 2017, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the oldest, largest, and best organized democratic Iranian opposition group presented startling new evidence that the jihadist regime in Tehran is violating the terms of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) agreement reached in July 2015 among the P-5 +1 (Permanent Five Members of the UN Security Council plus Germany), the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and Iran.

As will be recalled, it was the NCRI that first blew the lid off Iran’s clandestine nuclear weapons program in 2002, at a time when it had been in progress for at least fourteen years (since 1988), unbeknownst to most of the world, including the IAEA. Virtually all of the Iranian nuclear sites now known publicly were only retroactively ‘declared’ by the mullahs’ regime after exposure: the Natanz enrichment site, Isfahan conversion site, Fordow enrichment and Research and Development (R&D) site, Lavizan-Shian, and more. Regularly corroborated additional revelations since 2002 by the NCRI have built a record of credibility that should prompt a closer official look at these new reports by the U.S. State and Defense Departments, National Security Council (NSC), and White House.

Alireza Jafarzadeh, deputy director of NCRI’s Washington office, provided a devastating expose of the ongoing activities of the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research (SPND), the Tehran-based element of the Iranian Ministry of Defense that has primary responsibility for the regime’s nuclear weapons development. The SPND, established in February 2011, was officially sanctioned by the U.S. Department of State in August 2014 for engaging in nuclear weapons R&D.   Mohsen Fakhrizadeh (aka Dr. Hassan Mohseni), the founder and director of the SPND and a veteran IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps) brigadier general, was designated individually under UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1747 in 2007 and by the U.S. in July 2008 for his involvement in Iran’s proscribed WMD activities. Despite these designations, and the IAEA’s failure to resolve the many critical indicators of “Possible Military Dimensions” related to Iran’s nuclear program as specified in the November 2011 IAEA Board of Governors report, the July 2015 JCPOA inexplicably lifted sanctions against the SPND.

It is hardly surprising, then, to learn that the SPND not only continues critical weaponization research involving nuclear warheads, triggers, and explosives, but has expanded that work at each of seven subordinate locations. One of these, revealed by the NCRI in 2009 but never declared to the IAEA, is the Center for Research and Expansion of Technologies on Explosions and Impact (Markaz-e Tahghighat va Tose’e Fanavari-e Enfejar va Zarbeh or METFAZ), which works on triggers and high-impact, non-conventional explosives. The current METFAZ director is a Ministry of Defense engineer named Mohammad Ferdowsi, whose expertise is in high explosives. Ferdowsi also serves as chairman of the board of directors of the High-Explosive Society of Malek Ashtar University (affiliated with the Defense Ministry).

After conclusion of the July 2015 JCPOA, much of METFAZ’s personnel and work was moved to the Parchin military facility for better cover and security. Parchin Chemical Industries, an element of Iran’s Defense Industries Organization (DIO), was sanctioned by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2008 for importing “a chemical precursor for solid propellant oxidizer, possibly to be used for ballistic missiles.” Parchin is the location where the IAEA long suspected Iran was conducting test explosions for nuclear detonators. In October 2014, Iran finally admitted to using Parchin to test exploding bridge wires, but implausibly claimed they were not for weapons development. Equally incredibly, the IAEA concluded a secret side deal with Iran that allowed it to collect its own samples at Parchin—in which the IAEA in fact did find evidence of enriched uranium. But despite that and more evidence, the JCPOA was concluded and sanctions against Parchin Chemical Industries were lifted.

Within Parchin are twelve separate military and missile complexes. According to the NCRI’s new information, METFAZ has established a new location within one of these that is near the center of Parchin and referred to simply as the “Research Academy” in SPND internal communications. Located on the sprawling Parchin complex some 30 miles southeast of Tehran, the new METFAZ center is called the Chemical Plan of Zeinoddin and is located in a section called Plan 6. It’s completely fenced in and protected by heavy security under control of the IRGC’s Intelligence Service. What goes on there is concealed from the IAEA, and likely with good reason.
bF6Sh-pVhQmIpFv6-Qh2quuqbv3_epTp-xaC3CE3eWuL2OsVkSvDNYm5DouuwyAAF8hu2Ti9TNbuYM5t06dvVsS1w6vuoQEImSHD5pJwxPwjUvnZUU1HjjIVQlyDPW67RA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 
Old and New Locations for the SPND

9X_2XDjKmSJVAfew2oD430JNuAkKJKIr1UhsN7-s93MrO5v1aNB-XQqTenwpyAouSIDsZUOqw55XqmrJ3CaRk4zemV0Iu7ZjOUbxKDF6ermzSPLTTrTANbMx7wg6WVkcOYnhGw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

METFAZ’s Research Academy Location within Parchin Plan 6 Area

Lambasting the Iranian regime for its ongoing regional aggression and support to terrorist organizations, as Secretary of State Tillerson did on 20 April 2017, is certainly a step in the right direction. Noting that after ten years, Iran can break out and build all the bombs it wants is also a useful observation. But neither of those comes close to fulfilling the Trump campaign pledge to “rip up” the JCPOA – or hold Iran accountable for its violations of the JCPOA. Secretary Tillerson’s 18 April letter to U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan, certifying that Iran was in compliance with the 2015 deal, simply cannot be squared with the NCRI’s latest revelations, which it has shared with both the U.S. government and the IAEA. Indeed, the independent Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) issued a March 3, 2017 report in which it explicitly states about the IAEA’s 24 February 2017 Quarterly report, “Nowhere in the report does the IAEA state that Iran is fully compliant with the JCPOA, and it should not make that judgement.”

The real problem with the JCPOA—and why it needs to be ripped to shreds—is not what’s in it: it’s what’s been left out or exempted in any number of secret side deals that the U.S. and IAEA concluded with the Iranians. Among critical issues either explicitly permitted or simply not covered in the JCPOA are the following:
  • Iran keeps its entire nuclear infrastructure intact
  • Iran keeps all its centrifuges and is allowed to work on newer models
  • Iran can deny IAEA inspectors access to any site it seeks to keep off-limits
  • Iran can continue its ballistic missile nuclear weapons delivery system research, development, and testing
  • Iran’s nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missile collaboration with North Korea is not mentioned in the JCPOA
  • Iran’s ongoing support for terrorism is off-limits for the JCPOA
The Trump administration must make good on its campaign promises with regard to Iran, its nuclear weapons program, and the JCPOA. The U.S. with its international partners and the IAEA must demand that Iran fully implement all UN Security Council Resolutions including the one prohibiting Iran from any nuclear enrichment activities; accept the Additional Protocol; and allow unhindered access for IAEA inspectors to all suspected centers and facilities.

Beginning to fill relevant USG positions with officers untainted by association with the failed JCPOA or Iran Lobby affiliates like NIAC (National Iranian American Council) is an imperative and urgent first step. Announcing U.S. intent to end all activities associated with the JCPOA, hold Iran to account for its human rights abuses, involvement in the 9/11 attacks, and continuing support for terrorism would be natural subsequent policy positions.

We look forward to the results of the JCPOA policy review that Secretary Tillerson has announced.

http://www.aim.org/guest-column/irans-nuclear-weapons-program-on-course-underground-uninspected/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Email%20Apr-26-2017&utm_medium=email

Read more…

Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Muddy Maxine Waters: What a Riot
by Michelle Malkin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Top Headlines 
-7e4J3qK_H8IqC9kGqai5EdMIhtN9TEwR0GvwiMnJ5hHYOFEdWY9k_Borv2U9a2BEZsjjKDPEMG-VblIVzkPBCHf22GVa6x3B2FmmaCxdiIHp0bB5Z1oVgM5TqZIDg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Trump foreign policy and national security policy in 100 Days. (The Daily Signal)
 
Administration to propose large increase in deductions Americans can claim on their taxes. (The Washington Post)
 
Married people pay most of the nation's income tax. (Washington Examiner)
 
Your taxes at work: Government employee salaries outpace private-sector salaries by double digits for similar work. (The Washington Free Beacon)
 
While Congress stalls, conservatives are scoring big wins at the state level. (Washington Examiner)
 
Anticipating a shift to the right in the courts, the NRA begins its attack on gun controls in California. (Los Angeles Times)
 
ATF reverses controversial stance on shouldering AR-15 pistols. (The Washington Free Beacon)
 
Most homicides in U.S. occurred in 5% of counties. (The Washington Times)
 
Heritage Foundation flooded with protesters: "groups connected to George Soros." (The Washington Times)
 
Hump Day Humor: Merriam-Webster updates definition of "fascism" to "anything one disagrees with." (The Babylon Bee)
 
Policy: The liar-nObama administration's Iran-deal duplicity. (National Review)
 
Policy: North Korea is a problem, but China and Pakistan are just as harmful. (The Hill ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
.Trump Unveils New Tax Plan:
Here's What's Inside
zlfVwmji8H5G8_l3OsQJhIw8-VFxmVQbwKux12dZQjJ6OL0iQb0cUG6URfbb1Q9ZSfUA-XXvllYY91CZJTdaCJhRuWaG2NdbM71jK2OfDH91GgPN=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Hannity.com Staff
{hannity.com} ~ The Trump administration unveiled its dramatic new tax plan on Wednesday, hoping to pass the new legislation by August. If successful, this would be the first major adjustment in federal tax policy since 1986... Speaking with reporters at the White House briefing room, White House economic advisor Gary Cohn and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin outlined key details from the new proposal. “We have a once in a generation opportunity to do something big and important on taxes,” said Cohn. According to the Trump administration, the new tax plan will:
  • Cut corporate tax rates from 35% to 15%.
  • Reduce the number of income tax brackets from seven to three: 35%, 25%, and 10%.
  • Eliminate most tax deductions.
  • Repeal the estate or 'death' tax.
  • Permit a one time 'tax holiday' for overseas entities that wish to repatriate money back to the United States.
  • Repeal the 'liar-nobamacare' tax and the alternative minimum tax.     
http://www.hannity.com/articles/election-493995/trump-unveils-new-tax-plan-heres-15777768/

.

TUCKER: Battles Dem over legitimacy of judge's decision to block Trump's EO withholding funds from “Sanctuary Cities”

VIDEO:  http://video.insider.foxnews.com/v/5411264148001

Who Is The Democratic Party's Leader? Don't Ask Them Because They Don't Know
VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gmzXuN70Ac
CSP Executive Vice President Jim Hanson grades President Trump on his first 100 Days
VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV4TLpRJPms

NYT Reporter Says Press Conferences are More 'Democratic' Under Trump Than liar-nObama
VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBhKLzOgU3M
.
"Deep in the Heart of Texas!"
QGVSg96fc4rS9s0c0G2caIg5Xr--y7DmBdpcKHOAjouNB-jrytdLdESbvshci4zmSOlZleh7Ab9Kv3oIYMIUnnbYCYI-9qRLkh_Zq3jrY6BxTUWawf85ccSyqcu-PA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 
by AMBASSADOR HENRY F. COOPER

{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ A year ago, I joined a number of "Secure the Grid" colleagues at an Austin, Texas conference to discuss the existential threat to America posed by possible physical, cyber and electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks on the nation's electric power grid... or by a natural EMP event, a massive solar storm, that will one day certainly occur. The Texas Tribune report on that conference intended to inform Senator Bob Hall's efforts to gain support for his resolution in the Texas legislature to protect the "Texas Interconnect" of electric power grid against those threats. And May 3, 2016 discussion of that effort among others on the same trip, including Indiana, Louisiana and Alabama, to encourage a "bottom's up" effort to protect the electric power grid. Senator Hall's resolution failed to pass out of committee last year - lost by a single vote; and he is trying again, supported last week by many of the same colleagues, though I had conflicts in South Carolina and was not able to join them this year.  I am told his proposed legislation will pass out of committee overwhelmingly this time... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/deep-in-the-heart-of-texas?f=must_reads
.
Why is the Trump Administration Continuing
the Fight Against Nuns and Baptists?
wfxaL33UEzJaBk46nj45u2TLm2_Gcf9pBCwPQ4BP6k9H6LUYpCe3nXuG7h1xXZpoR8vmyVsZAdTKoQc0UvwKGNA29NUdZuxQF5oeKRkpSsGZaTzEjutBJ8wEgWMJ3YuDsVaLrUtQ_LSfRB1m=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Anika Smith
{stream.org} ~ The Trump administration appears to be continuing liar-nObama’s losing fight on the contraception mandate, and religious liberty advocates aren’t sure why... This week Trump’s DOJ asked the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for a 60-day stay in the case with East Texas Baptist University and other religious nonprofits who object to the HHS mandate. This means trouble for those who have sought exemption from the onerous mandate, including Little Sisters of the Poor. The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty represents the Little Sisters and East Texas Baptist University. According to Becket, the stay is unnecessary...https://stream.org/trump-administration-continuing-fight-nuns-baptists/?utm_source=The+Stream&utm_campaign=04013d61e6-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8da00e4cb4-04013d61e6-371883569
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Muddy Maxine Waters: What a Riot
k1v5Dj_XdDIHYux2qt6MGjNX2wUu1epeSLQsuoj5YLnjcUzccIptyzXIqVHCOhn6EtNRssEAS9cVsjGVYYbHQM2BqVc_yA3U3-bp5ib7kSDt2vWHDObbK46UbjsBMDRe6CNPnjW7MZSDWj3UI1eDNaQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Michelle Malkin
{townhall.com} ~ Are you freaking kidding me? Thirteen-term Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Beltway barnacle permanently affixed to USS Government, is now the fresh-faced "rock star" of the Democratic Party.

"Auntie Maxine" is stoking the resistance, inspiring millennials, combating hate, crusading against corruption and invoking the counterinsurgent cry to "stay woke!"

I do not have enough guffaws to give.

This new spokesmodel for civility and clean government has stoked division and exploited taxpayers for decades.

Change agent? She has served on the Democratic National Committee since 1980 -- when the Atari 2600 was cutting-edge, Kim Kardashian was a newborn, and Al Franken was hamming it up on "Saturday Night Live."

Waters has spent 37 years in office -- many of those years as head of the Congressional Black Caucus -- promising to make life better for constituents in economically ravaged South Central Los Angeles.

What do the denizens of her district have to show for it? Staggering levels of persistent unemployment, poverty and gang violence as the 25th anniversary of the L.A. riots looms this coming weekend.

What does Rep. Waters have to show for it?

She's earned a lifetime of left-wing adoration for whitewashing the deadly riots as a "rebellion," excusing the week-long shooting, looting and arson orgy as "a spontaneous reaction to a lot of injustice and a lot of alienation and frustration," and coddling Crips and Bloods gang members -- with whom she performed the Electric Slide as part of her "fearless support and understanding of young people and their efforts at self-expression."

I covered Waters in the early 1990s as an editorial writer and columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. Her federally funded Maxine Waters Employment Preparation Center was a gang-infested boondoggle.

She embraced Damian Williams, the infamous thug who hurled a chunk of concrete at white truck driver Reginald Denny and performed a victory dance over the bloodied innocent bystander.

And she and her family personally profited from her rise to racially demagogic power.

She owns a tony mansion in predominantly white Hancock Park, several miles outside her congressional district.

She secured an ambassadorship to the Bahamas for her husband, a former pro football player and car salesman whose main qualification was having traveled to the island for a vacation.

Her daughter, Karen, has scooped up nearly $650,000 in payments from Mama Waters' slate mailer operation for her federal campaign committee since 2006, the Washington Free Beacon reported this week. And Mama Waters owes her well-heeled daughter an additional $108,000.

Waters also mau-maued the House Veterans Committee into hiring two black staffers.

And she walked away with a slap on the wrist from the toothless House Ethics Committee in 2012 after being charged with multiple ethics violations related to her meddling in minority-owned OneUnited Bank.

Reminder for all the new fangirls and fanboys suffering from Maxi-mnesia: Her husband, Sidney, was an investor in one of the banks that merged into OneUnited. As stockholders, they profited handsomely from their relationship with the bank.

It was a mutually beneficial relationship. After Waters' office personally intervened and lobbied the Treasury Department in 2008, OneUnited received $12 million in federal TARP bailout money -- despite another government agency concluding that the bank operated "without effective underwriting standards" and engaged "in speculative investment practices." After the federal bailout of Fannie/Freddie, OneUnited's stock in the government-sponsored enterprises plunged to a value estimated at less than $5 million. Only through Waters' intervention was OneUnited able to secure an emergency meeting with the Treasury and then-Secretary Henry Paulson.

Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, reported that Waters' friend and fellow California Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren helped delay her scheduled 2010 House ethics trial on the matter by stalling subpoenas and improperly firing two attorneys working on the investigation. Six of 10 House Ethics panel members quit the case in 2012 over questions about their partiality. An outside investigator absolved Waters of any wrongdoing.

The newfound Maxine Waters Fan Club might want to know that Waters' government cronyism and self-dealing earned her a "Most Corrupt member of Congress" designation from the left-wing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington five times -- in 2005, 2006, 2009, 2011 and 2017.

Now, Muddy Maxine is leading the charge to drain the swamp that sustains her. What a riot. 
Read more…

Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Jeff Sessions Is Right About New York
by Seth Barron
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 This Iran Deal's Getting Worse All the Time 
BQWMBvsSXUVoz_yb0RHREiHmZlfpx6RFbaCD0uQW81XzKAdYTug7gpInqNzvINwUx29ODfJ24__1si_TGpdODJr9Mu-YsohKglozZW0yvDo4sV3Ou5ynZDvMXoNdxA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
During the campaign, Donald Trump trashed Barack liar-nObama's nuclear deal with Iran as the "worst deal ever negotiated," and rightfully so. It was, after all, the sum of all lies. So when the Trump administration announced a review of the deal and that Iran was currently in compliance with it, leftists smugly responded, "We told you so." As if that proved the genius of the deal.
          National Review's Jonathan Tobin explains, "Those who focus on Iranian compliance are missing the big picture about both the consequences of the nuclear deal and the chances for reversing the colossal mistake liar-nObama made with Iran. As Trump and his foreign-policy team are realizing, the issue isn't so much whether the letter of a deal that will expire within a decade is observed as it is what role Iran is playing in the region while its economy recovers and its nuclear program remains a long-term problem. The threatening talk from Washington isn't a flimsy cover for a flip-flop. It's a recognition that the Iranian threat was actually exacerbated by liar-nObama's gambit."
          How so? Well, for starters, Iran got to keep its nuclear infrastructure, including the ability to continue enriching uranium, all while inspecting itself at its primary weaponization facility. That's right — Iran can advance its program while still "complying" with the deal. Eight years from now, Iran is free to finish its development of nuclear weapons effectively with the stamp of approval from the West. And as long as Iran is in "compliance," Trump is going to find it difficult to justify rescinding the deal. Besides, North Korea already has the bomb, meaning our allies are less interested in revisiting the Iran agreement than dealing with the crazy guy firing missiles every other week.
          Moreover, liar-nObama paid the mullahs $1.7 billion in clandestinely delivered cash in a hostage deal — in which he also released Iranian spies. Flush with that money and some sanctions relief, Iran has no reason to rush, and every reason not to. Iran is gaining regional hegemony, including propping up Syria's Bashar al-Assad, which the deal did not address at all. Iran thus has practically everything it wanted. Trump's challenge is figuring out how to renew pressure on Iran and advance U.S. national security interests in the region. Simple enough, right? 
~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Freedom Caucus supports
liar-nObamacare repeal deal while centrists waver
ZP_NPs7-dz9AJYY1-woP3dL2sgeDEJbJ_ONde7TbPpbV9eBHlOGqqgylr77yDsO8if3XtP7h7TWBsmTfHYcuo2Wsx7uTuBflaryeZOnkqA3TS2nQ6IH_ADIQ2UvQBnZe0ZH1Gz2EYwwsI3Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Robert King
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ In a major win for GOP leadership, the leadership of the House Freedom Caucus said Wednesday that it supports a new deal to repeal liar-nObamacare. But support from centrist Republicans is lagging... "While the revised version still does not fully repeal liar-nObamacare, we are prepared to support it to keep our promise to the American people to lower healthcare costs," Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., the House Freedom Caucus chairman, said in a statement. Meadows did not indicate whether all of the approximately three dozen members of the group would vote for the bill. The Freedom Caucus typically supports legislation only when 80 percent of its membership is behind it...
.
Trump’s Enemies GOP Leaders On Capitol Hill –
Fight, Obstruct, Ridicule Him
_kY3PFGYPGEnAAKXFJFHeGHGnpdaJfp094mJLTukD1eG064OopXkaXX-F5UANnPrzSdQD29kUZCKBzV_QUAr30A3Obfe13zY0Ulz2RBDJdKby2kZEP34z0-NYyC_U0d9giQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Laura Ingraham joins Sean Hannity for a discussion that reveals the level of betrayal and establishment arrogance that still exists within the Republican leadership... towards the Trump agenda that we, the people, support and elected him to fulfill. Hannity leads with the decision by President Trump to remove the funding of the border wall as an obstruction, a move that has the potential to backfire and play right into Democrat hands, with the assistance of corrupt Republicans. It is already being regarded as a surrender and a victory for the left by many. Ingraham responds, “One thing that I know for sure, Sean, is that we have way too many people on Capitol Hill who aren’t on the President’s side on this issue. And I’m talking Republicans. So I have no doubt in my mind that Donald Trump wants this wall to be built. Congress has to appropriate the money...http://rickwells.us/ingraham-trumps-enemies-gop-leaders-capitol-hill-fight-obstruct-ridicule/
.
PC Pentagon Caves To CAIR, Agrees
to 'Review' Anti-Terror Training Program
_fxnGJj7RSbJ7NOQ5uzFw7J_uBZv6vnrmU3haXSMPsNAD4ktgiouZYuwu4nwZgZWDnX7tA-e_waZ5qj9rkOB0ea12g8Fb9c5B9Qyb-R0ySr764OdZuMgmyyeH_XsG5Nh6YA9hM0oxCtr7QYNVR85Ek4taI4FZ9Lcr1T6Munxc9icvTpMY9PXZA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Sperry
{frontpagemag.com} ~ The Pentagon has agreed to formally review an anti-terror training program taught to special forces by a private contractor for material deemed offensive to Islam and Muslims... even though the Muslim group that lodged a complaint against the allegedly “Islamophobic” program has been accused by the Justice Department of supporting terrorism and is currently banned from outreach activities by the FBI. The instructor hired to teach the program says he fears his class might not get a fair hearing, because military brass have assigned the review to a Muslim military chaplain who graduated from a radical Saudi-funded Islamic school raided by federal agents after 9/11 on suspicion of terrorist activities. He is their second choice for conducting the review. They had originally picked a more radical military chaplain to inspect the training materials before learning he has ties to an imam with a history of ministering to Muslims later convicted of terrorism...What the heck are they doing. Haven't they learned yet? http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266509/pc-pentagon-caves-cair-agrees-review-anti-terror-paul-sperry
.
Leadership, Not Art Of The Deal, GOP Has All
3 Branches Of Govt – Build The Damn Wall
4eX03xIZYSdOmruQ7-dp4wY4FaUx-aX0VEI_DIdHJpk-FZEgP8VRzWj58r2kc0e97ialASTMSmRHfCUxWOzY0IhlV9xTKFj9dZ6RB86F0ku5aH6IOAex9LfRALQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Mark Levin believes there’s no excuse for what the Republican Congress is doing. He says, “There’s no excuse for what Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell are doing or not doing... There’s no excuse for the fact that the President doesn’t yank them into the Oval Office and read them the riot act. Levin says he’s talking about the priorities the President ran on and the priorities that matter to us.“ Levin points out that, “Chuck clown-Schumer, Nancy Pulosi, their predecessors and their successors, do not have permanent control over the treasury of the United States, to reward their favorite constituent groups and donors and to redistribute wealth. And the only way to address this is the way that it was addressed during the Presidency of Ronald Reagan.  He continues, “And yes, be prepared to have a showdown. Be prepared to have a showdown and the competency  in the articulation as the Republican Party that controls all the damn elected branches in Washington DC, to make the case to the American people, that it is the despicable snake oil salesman, Chuck clown-Schumer, and the despicable failure, Nancy Pulosi, who are destroying this economy, who are driving up the debt and that we have a President who wants to do something about both.”...http://rickwells.us/levin-leadership-not-art-deal-gop-3-branches-govt-build-damn-wall/
.
Canada’s top imam: “Jihad will continue
until the Day of Judgment”
oSd7kVpK77IR2r_94fkK1xL0XGGHV4sfTANUiLv4jtkyXhpQdVGuGeHfz1uxL81LHJs7Wb22vjO3sivM_fXVNZ2ogoE98AojLAPa1feoh5g1rHsgkhlD4yCzVBhzepsAFlk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Christine Williams
{jihadwatch.org} ~ Dr. Iqbal Al-Nadvi (Mohammad Iqbal Masood Al-Nadvi) is the Chairperson of Canadian Council of Imams (Canada’s top imam) and the Amir (President) of Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) Canada... a nation-wide Islamic organization that is striving “to build an Exemplary Canadian Muslim Community” by “total submission to Him [Allah] and through the propagation of true and universal message of Islam.” He also serves as the Muslim Chaplain of the Canadian army. In a panel discussion in Toronto on the “Finality of Prophethood”, Nadvi called Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam a “false prophet” who abrogated the jihad in contradiction to an explicit hadith by Mohammad who said the jihad will continue to the end of time...Canada is for a rude awaking. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/04/canadas-top-imam-jihad-will-continue-until-the-day-of-judgment
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Jeff Sessions Is Right About New York
dcGmSOehZQG5pYttWpUziqGUilBuYdXmIeisF1e8C-9wrtra77Nuo2L-MckIS5BqRdrZnOkl_dolHB_eKzrnbsVh5vgxYMaT5U3GO_mg_1rhikeDiN4Z4zVNr5RqPII42RTzBBCpJo8yaGLq3vqtGQNrlUdGl1EiNEFHlQo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Seth Barron
{city-journal.org} ~
Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a statement last week to nine self-described sanctuary cities, ordering them to certify compliance with federal immigration law. Sessions in particular cited gang-related crime in these cities, and, in reference to New York, remarked, “New York City continues to see gang murder after gang murder, the predictable consequence of the city's ‘soft on crime’ stance.”

Those words prompted outrage from New York mayor Bill de Blasio and NYPD commissioner James O’Neill. The mayor called Sessions’s statement “outrageous” and “an insult” to law enforcement. “Month after month crime has gone down,” de Blasio said. “That seems to have reached everywhere but Washington, D.C.” Commissioner O’Neill said that his “blood began to boil” when he heard the attorney general’s claims. “To say we’re soft on crime is absolutely ludicrous.” Other elected officials took to Twitter to denounce Sessions. City council speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, who is planning a massive legislative effort to block municipal cooperation with federal authorities on immigration enforcement, called Sessions’s remarks “Ridiculous & surely illegal.” Some reporters chimed in on the mayor’s behalf, editorializing, for instance, that “# are unequivocally on BDB’s side.”

But Sessions didn’t claim that crime is rising in New York City, as it is in Chicago and other major cities. He said that New York is plagued by gang-related homicide, and that the city has gone “soft” on enforcement. Are these statements true?

So far in 2017, New York City has had 64 homicides, with arrests made in 38 cases. The NYPD describes 16 of these homicides as gang-related. That means that at least 25 percent of the city’s killings this year have been “gang murders.”

The real number is probably much higher. Twenty-six murders remain unsolved, and these tend to be nighttime shootings in which suspects slip away, a characteristic of gangland killings. In recent years, approximately half of all New York City homicides have been gang-related. With two-fifths of this year’s murder cases still open, it’s likely that at least some of them will turn out to be gang-related.

Sessions is right that New York City has seen “gang murder after gang murder,” on the order of at least one per week, and maybe two. That’s not much compared with Chicago today or with New York in the 1980s, but it indicates that violent gangs operate with some regularity. Hundreds of gang-related, nonlethal shooting incidents occur, too. The NYPD has taken down lots of gangs—100 in 2016, according to Commissioner O’Neill—but more work clearly remains to be done.

Is Sessions right that the city is “soft on crime”? Crime is, after all, at historic lows across New York, even as it spikes nationwide. The NYPD deserves enormous credit for that.

But it’s not all good news: the city’s political class wants to lower crime figures largely by defining crime out of existence. The de Blasio administration has reduced the penalties for public consumption of alcohol, possession of marijuana, and public urination. The recent Lippmann Report, which urges the closure of the municipal jail on Rikers Island, encourages the city to decriminalize prostitution, turnstile jumping, and the possession of gravity knives. If there are no laws, there can be no crime, and hence no criminals. QED.

Brooklyn’s acting district attorney, Eric Gonzalez, wants to reduce criminal charges for illegal immigrants to make it less likely that they will be deported. He promises to seek “immigration-neutral disposition” of criminal cases. This policy will require all prosecutors to coordinate with defense attorneys to discuss the potential consequences of guilty pleas on the defendant’s immigration status. “If someone confronts a guilty plea that would automatically subject them to a harsh immigration penalty,” explained Gonzalez, “and there’s another possible plea that would hold them accountable and ensure public safety, justice demands they be given the one that doesn’t have immigration consequences.” The district attorneys for Queens, Manhattan, and the Bronx will likely join him in this new cause.

De Blasio and the rest of the city’s leadership insist that sanctuary policies somehow make New York safer. Following this logic, then, protection of the “undocumented” should be the ultimate goal of public policy, since we’ll just get safer and safer the more illegal residents we harbor. Unlike the last eight years, however, an attorney general in Washington doesn’t see it that way.
Read more…

Thurs/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The police vs. the PC police
by Cal Thomas
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Nine 'Sanctuary' Jurisdictions Face Defunding 
g_ZB-RbUItLgtlsxtRnw2s36JEiTv0LuC4QvkU_E4UDF3mjef1rvwjMe9GnJfleitH42V3KPPs8DLO7_5clJwdE4E5UO-MSA3BNelDXMhi8wmHcsByjICU7Li-Y7kBo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Department of Justice has singled out and distributed a missive to nine jurisdictions alerting them to the financial consequences of continuing to shield illegal immigrants. According to the DOJ, "The letters remind the recipient jurisdictions that, as a condition for receiving certain financial year 2016 funding from the Department of Justice, each of these jurisdictions agreed to provide documentation and an opinion from legal counsel validating that they are in compliance with Section 1373."
          That law stipulates: "[A] Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual." You'll recall last month when Attorney General Jeff Sessions pre-empted Friday's action: "The Department of Justice will require that jurisdictions seeking or applying for DOJ grants to certify compliance with [U.S. Code 1373] as a condition of receiving those awards." Obviously, Sessions is signaling that he isn't bluffing on the sanctuary city crackdown.
          To be clear, "These letters are not demanding that police and municipal governments assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in rounding up illegal immigrants subject to deportation orders," Reason's Scott Shackford explains. "The federal government cannot force cities to help them enforce immigration laws. It's important to understand that, just as they can't force cities to enforce the federal ban on marijuana possession or consumption."
          Shackford adds, "There is, however, a federal immigration regulation that this small group of cities may be violating. Federal regulations forbid any state or local government from prohibiting its employees from communicating with the feds about any person's immigration status. So, for example, if a local police officer arrests somebody he knows is an immigrant in the United States illegally, he cannot be prohibited from passing that information along to ICE. The targets of these letters are cities — New Orleans, Miami, Chicago (and Cook County), Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, New York City, Sacramento (California) — that have policies or ordinances that prohibit this communication."
          And that defiance is a big reason the DOJ says that "many of these jurisdictions are ... crumbling under the weight of illegal immigration and violent crime." These jurisdictions are actively shielding illegal immigrants, some of whom are felonious. And by doing so they are essentially telling officers of the law to disregard their conscience. That's a total disregard for Rule of Law.
          Words matter. And when word gets around that jurisdictions will defy immigration statutes, it only emboldens illegal immigrants. But words matter when it comes to enforcement too. Donald Trump's and Sessions' hardline stance on illegal immigration is the driving force for why illegal border crossings are down significantly. In that sense, the status quo has already been shattered. And cities that pretend otherwise do so at their own peril. 
~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ethics Complaint Against Chaffetz For Cover Up Of Extortion 17, Flynn Used As Diversion
QYOS-tJ3LDZVzf9EHtghN2GdyH0JvA5aRZ5N7K0zWaD09xN2EVqXwX7JGLx5avxOXU3phl2RV81Q_8OJOMqX2egfvORTHVF9VvQg-2C5qw3LtAG46dviXwEw7wZaCY_1U9RpyJyjThM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The first question that comes to mind in watching the sideshow that Rep Congressman Jason Chaffetz is performing with libtard Greta Van Susteren acting as ring master is ‘Why are you after General Michael Flynn... when there is a whole mountain of evidence on liar-Hillary Clinton’s espionage and treason against the United States. Why, when it undoubtedly extends to Hussein liar-nObama, John hanoi-Kerry, and other key members of the criminal operation that was and remains as the liar-nObama OFA shadow government are you ignoring the whales and targeting the minnow? The Chaffetz, Van Susteren interview is the second video below, the first one sets the stage with Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch founder explaining why he believes Chaffetz is retiring from the House. It’s a decision that he believes involves Chaffetz attempting to run away from being prosecuted for his own criminal activity or at a minimum having his career ruined...
.
Expert: North Korea has EMP attack capability
CnKoSoGuJV-5pw3e7iq9qwgZheKsEP2yrHl2HAn0WG_TcWRyXnoD2iALQQa_dWvZ_rn-QszMc6NWlyedS4EylNxbx7VGCVsQLw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{wnd.com} ~ Americans have become accustomed to a steady flow of troubling news from North Korea lately. The communist nation detained another U.S. citizen over the weekend and held a massive artillery drill on Monday... as American naval forces moved closer to the reclusive communist dictatorship. The American media worries about whether a North Korean missile could hit California, and sales of nuclear shelters and air purifiers that can block radiation are skyrocketing in Japan. Yet, with a report that the U.S. government sabotaged a recent missile test, many Americans may be tempted to dismiss the threat from Kim Jong-un’s Hermit Kingdom...http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/expert-north-korea-has-emp-attack-capability/
.
 Keep Your Fancy Airplane Ryan –
Get Out Of The Way
DotetrlsZcMDfyxKVVgAxAQdgRy-Sa2WPqh6e4SIALOgwvr3ZR4ND4uhc3S-Zt9YCYCS7KNeIVsZAkZjQOxleCGpl2BUGF7QV97F-QX4ayC-k9pjg3xG08ylR0o=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs has a few thoughts as “members of Congress are trickling back into our nation’s capital, particularly Congressmen and women who’ve heard an earful from their constituents... many of whom can’t quite understand why the Republican Party, in control of the House, the Senate and the Presidency, can’t get anything done.” Dobbs continues, describing their mystification as to “Why they refuse to help, for example, the President move his agenda ahead. And Lord, they don’t like speaker Ryan, 40% of voters view him negatively, almost twice as many do so as those who like him, up from 5% in February. And a vast majority of Americans are just unimpressed by Congress altogether.” “Nearly three-quarters disapproves of Congress’ job performance, that’s up twelve 12 points just since February. There’s no mystery about why. The Dems in Congress want a government shutdown, Speaker Ryan seems indifferent and cooperative with the Democrats, as usual,” notes Dobbs.”...http://rickwells.us/lou-dobbs-keep-fancy-airplane-ryan-just-please-please-get-way/
.
Palestinians: The Secret West Bank
F85qXXZSihSE4f4rGGLglPyq6IgGVGTxddmOpLhKsqRTcwksL-pBoLtIbLs-tIOo_vyAgO4GWDQz-TrzDqMf_WKpgBQ0RA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Thousands of supporters of Hizb ut Tahrir, a radical pan-Islamic political organization
by Bassam Tawil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ often refer to Ramallah as a modern and liberal city dominated by Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah faction... The city boasts fancy restaurants and bars where alcohol is served freely to men and women in Western dress, who sit together to eat and to smoke water pipes (nargilas). But the scenes on the streets of Ramallah, headquarters of Abbas's Palestinian Authority (PA) last week broadcast a rather different message -- one that calls for the elimination of Israel. The message came on the eve of Abbas's visit to the White House for his first meeting with US President Donald Trump. As Abbas and his advisors prepare for the May 3 meeting with Trump, however, thousands of Palestinians gathered in Ramallah to call on Arab armies to "liberate Palestine, from the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) sea." The Palestinians also called for replacing Israel with an Islamic Caliphate... https://www.https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10276/secret-west-bank/10276/secret-west-bank
.
State Dept. official reassigned amid
conservative media attacks
jcSuPy6UPe5_MI9CtV4LvyRrrmSQHfvlyIOkmg8ITHV-zla49mQZn5pT7_LYNiUgk83-LcRhEj2FKJeoHnv7jVGmrp1iX57d0tvZlRR8VzoPqX5MV-SnTKmB0pZZDTvuCahQQFXZb_YI0l74Ad-eM9eQC1j6BDEr7BrhPnDCzhrWSYaFfcsjHrOOdgDknPc8fHRMquNZPsc874qBa3BBpTmNR-SNfPUR0nff3gV5LAfe_HB7jfIh--bfwwDUJe7Yjnb5UyPTNBIFaCo-GCShhCd0D27NCuxa=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Nahal Toosi
{politico.com} ~ The Trump administration has moved a second career government employee out of a top advisory role amid pressure from conservative media outlets that have publicly targeted individual staffers... questioning their loyalty to the new administration.Nowrouzzadeh, a civil service employee who helped shape the controversial Iran nuclear deal, had been detailed since last July to the secretary of state’s policy planning team, where she handled ongoing issues related to Iran and Gulf Arab countries. Her yearlong assignment was cut short earlier this month, after critical stories about her and others appeared in the Conservative Review and on Breitbart News, according to the State Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter. Nowrouzzadeh did not want to be reassigned, according to the official...http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/21/sahar-nowrouzzadeh-reassigned-state-department-237466
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The police vs. the PC police
o4iSc_odvLZXsfQOo6nHjGdFI9vvNm09u0mWUvJ2cx8ClGGv36JCDHrBnCM55lqwvyeaFpcMi9asETnuAW9YB0f8JvcIixxfAzJqnKSu_xzc_TMRJPe86ekwS6J7u-UmUH5aPFE-pRbA5x2Qwf8Np-yUf6H7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 
by Cal Thomas
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ As is almost always the case, signs of trouble preceded the latest shooting in Paris, which left one police officer dead and wounded two bystanders before police killed the gunman, later identified as French national Karim Cheurfi, a known criminal with a long, violent record. ISIS claimed to be behind the attack. According to police, a note praising ISIS fell out of Cheurfi's pocket when he fell.

Cheurfi was of Algerian descent, born in a Paris suburb. The Washington Post reported he had a criminal record and was known to authorities. His rap sheet included four arrests and convictions since 2003. He had spent nearly 14 years in prison for crimes that included burglary, theft and attempted murder.

When Cheurfi attempted to buy weapons French authorities took notice, especially when he made statements about wishing to kill police officers. After he traveled to Algeria earlier this year, Paris prosecutor Francois Molins said Cheurfi was interviewed, but a judge refused to revoke his probation. It makes one question not only France's probation laws, but the types of background checks in place that ought to have prevented Cheurfi from legally acquiring any firearm if he bought it legally, much less the Kalashnikov rifle he allegedly used.

French and other European politicians immediately expressed concern over what effect the shooting and the terrorist attacks that preceded it might have on France's choice of a new president. Rightist candidates immediately tried to exploit the issue, but it has been a subject on the minds of French voters, particularly in Paris, where a major enclave of immigrants from Muslim countries continue to be seen by many as a threat to the French way of life.

Cheurfi should have been back in jail for parole violations. Given his record, his statements and the trip to Algeria, enough red flags were raised to warrant action.

A side note. While Algeria has not been a main source of terrorism in the world, the human rights agency Algeria Watch has noted: "Although Algerian nationals were not among the suicide bombers of 11 September 2001, they have featured prominently in subsequent investigations into al-Qaida activities in North America and Europe. In the UK, where an Algerian community has grown as a largely unknown minority in recent years, several dozen Algerians have been arrested since mid-2001 in localities as widely spread as Leicester, Glasgow, Edinburgh, London and Manchester. Arrests in London in January 2003 uncovered a cell producing ricin, while in Manchester, one of the Algerian detainees, 27-year-old Kamel Bourgass, was responsible for killing a police officer -- the first victim in the UK's post-11 September anti-terrorist campaign."

United States and other countries in the West, most often someone has to actually break the law before they can be arrested. Given the tactics of terrorists, it might be worth discussing whether to invoke a doctrine of pre-emption, which is sometimes employed when an enemy nation appears to be an imminent threat. If that is an option to prevent death and destruction from countries, why can't we impose something similar for people who have violent criminal records and who openly state, as Cheurfi did, that he intends to kill police?

Western reluctance to adapt such a practice shows there is one force more powerful than the uniformed police. It is the "PC police." These are people who care more about how they feel than for the innocent people gunned down in our streets.

Don't innocents have the right to be protected from fanatics who so often claim to be doing the Divine's work? With ongoing investigations by the Department of Homeland Security into radical terrorists in every state, it's long past time to get them before they get any more of us.
Read more…

Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Progress With The Board of Education
by Tom McLaughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Howard Dean Really Hates 'Hate Speech' 
6YkG4_V_hz-UnkooQiO2LIJ9WRcMvVdxlOZ_lBQ1J0ISefhL7m5rEfEdlV4FSHlGMgAIJmEqV54wxzdKy-3gi1JfgyENwMCEpF9HUcLH-J482SoxmOkkUB0xn68C3Yk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Former Vermont governor and failed presidential aspirant Howard Dean has some advice for conservative firebrands targeted by student snowflakes on college campuses. According to Dean, "Hate speech is not protected by the first amendment." He asserted this last week after former New York Times reporter Steven Greenhouse reminded his followers (also via Twitter), "Free Speech Defenders Don't Forget: Ann Coulter once said: My only regret w/ Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."
          But that wasn't the end of Dean's screed. In March, Ann Coulter, in her typically inflammatory way, facetiously said, "I would like to see a little more violence from the innocent Trump supporters set upon by violent leftist hoodlums." This prompted another retort from Dean, who last night asserted, "This is NOT protected speech under the first amendment." Add all this up, Dean contends, and here's the bottom line: "This does not mean she can be prosecuted for saying this but I argue this kind of stuff is grounds for barring her from a University campus."
          There's a legitimate argument to be had regarding Coulter's approach to confabulation. But there's no overstating how important it is to protect free speech — one of the cornerstones of a free society. That's why Coulter's remarks — unnecessarily provocative though they may be — shouldn't be, and legally aren't, considered to be promoting violence.
          If "hate speech" can be interpreted any way we want, then literally any and all dissent is fair game. Oddly enough, an unlikely politician understands this. Another Vermont renegade, Bernie Sanders, correctly said, "Obviously Ann Coulter's outrageous ― to my mind, off the wall. But you know, people have a right to give their two cents-worth, give a speech, without fear of violence and intimidation." He even offered this challenge to anti-Coulter antagonists: "Ask her the hard questions. Confront her intellectually. Booing people down, or intimidating people, or shutting down events, I don't think that that works in any way."
          And here we have yet another strange rift among leftists. Perhaps Sanders and DNC chief Tom Perez can add this to their list of issues to hash out while on their "unity tour," whose only achievement thus far has been highlighting just how divided the party is. ~The Patriot Post
.
.G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Former liar-nObama Official Says Bureaucrats
Manipulate Climate Stats to Influence Policy
FL3Bcl2EhpXBAHaafnJXBH1gs3Q8DSMiNVjUwNUKqh7mUHHI2Oq55mCggy64imz_Jf1F_dsFbgj4yqUFjn-D18j6skq0K8IJFDm8vwpTf2HG89J8ixwmBj2-My9d5is=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Chris White
{dailysignal.com} ~ A former member of the liar-nObama administration claims Washington, D.C., often uses “misleading” news releases about climate data to influence public opinion... Former Energy Department Undersecretary Steven Koonin told The Wall Street Journal Monday that bureaucrats within former President Barack liar-nObama’s administration spun scientific data to manipulate public opinion. “What you saw coming out of the press releases about climate data, climate analysis, was, I’d say, misleading, sometimes just wrong,” Koonin said, referring to elements within the liar-nObama administration he said were responsible for manipulating climate data...http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/24/former-obama-official-says-bureaucrats-manipulate-climate-stats-to-influence-policy/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpnMk9XUmpaVE5rTWpNeiIsInQiOiJkc0FzMUhlYWpla01Qcm43TkNaN29ZY0V0RzhjWTM2a0NPSzZSaWRHXC9xXC92NjRaNW1qMXhNUk1jcjF0MVJDcGV0bFE1OFU1cVdoRFFkS01tSlN5Z0RBWDR5dUN2Ump1d2JGNjllWTQ0YlVZZXR4S21xdTJXdEJYcG1vaHdCXC9leSJ9
.
NSA Blimp Spied in the United States
MdNMHNGMH_o8Zkb1cQ9q-fgFCOFwR7t2v5ZE8L0Zs6k6ZAm7nG3umzqqxdP6ruVPwpu47oqLTFrzL23JJfcdeSpBluLLSXCQZP58Vw_hjbloQQ_YIknzDQ43BGdBsfnZQKct0ddUo3p3gc-YwNBrRia3CWgT9UnztX_uFAccmdWiGEGcUHP37p_nA4V-6IOS1P0YRClRt03Clg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Ryan Gallagher
{theintercept.com} ~ To residents of Maryland, catching an occasional glimpse of a huge white blimp floating in the sky is not unusual. For more than a decade, the military has used the state as a proving ground for new airships destined for Afghanistan or Iraq... But less known is that the test flights have sometimes served a more secretive purpose involving National Security Agency surveillance. Back in 2004, a division of the NSA called the National Tactical Integration Office fitted a 62-foot diameter airship called the Hover Hammer with an eavesdropping device, according to a classified document published Monday by The Intercept. The spy equipment on the airship was called Digital Receiver Technology — a proprietary system manufactured by a Maryland-based company of the same name — which can intercept wireless communications, including cellphone calls...https://theintercept.com/2017/04/24/nsa-blimp-spied-in-the-united-states/
.
liar-nObama Freed Iranians Who Dealt In Guns, IED’s, Cruises Missile And Nuke Tech
ihLmGROOc1Nbpc3HN55qZlc67xwHprbRhs6lKZeYsLYxcabph1Ja24819-sqjjGfa9ndwVreSE1VMEMQIz00kforHFjtBxij4mxXypHJaNmW3lwOyGpEsV2TqTIQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Mark Levin noticed an enlightening article on Politico that he shared with his audience, detailing some serious criminality of Hussein liar-nObama in his giveaways and favors to the Iranians... When liar-nObama announced the “one time gesture” of releasing Iranian born prisoners who “were not charged with terrorism or any violent offense” last year, they presented it “as a modest trade off for the ‘greater good’ of the Iran nuclear agreement and Tehran’s pledge to free five Americans.” He notes, “They weren’t telling the whole story on January 17th, 2016.” Levin said, “In his Sunday morning address to the American people Friday being his holy day, liar-nObama portrayed the seven men he freed as civilians. The senior official described them as businessmen, awaiting trial or convicted of mere sanctions, related to offenses, violations of the trade embargo.” That wasn’t the whole story. The items involved had military applications in guidance and other systems utilized in cruise missiles and other highly technical military hardware, including satellites. The DOJ also secretly dropped charges and international arrest warrants against fourteen other Iranians...http://rickwells.us/levin-obama-freed-iranians-dealt-guns-ieds-cruises-missile-nuke-tech/
.
40 to 60 Teens Flood CA Mass Transit
Train, Robbing, Injuring Passengers
8dXu7mP1aLw_M-ga4kAGhkA5_yE_tJ1iKgKdtSMycVQ6fw4FB0PbG0iKr57Bws3zYUdQf7bSBFNyJR3IrbUV7DZqc7_M3xzi88jzPktZq_y1xT_gMTsBtZyEUg7maaCJvzHNcr4MdF8j7Qond5dnuITC6pknmACLlA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Philip Hodges
{eaglerising.com} ~ According to police, witnesses reported that anywhere from 40 to 60 people – believed to be minors – flooded an Oakland, California Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station Saturday night... jumped the fare gates, and basically took over a train car, injuring and robbing people. “We are in the process of pulling all surveillance video and we will share with Oakland police, Oakland Unified School District and Oakland Housing Authority to see if they can help identify the minors,” she said. “We have had success with sharing images of juveniles with this group and identifying and making arrests in the past.”...http://eaglerising.com/43086/40-to-60-teens-flood-ca-mass-transit-train-robbing-injuring-passengers/
.
Hamas: The New Charter That Isn't
GJAcd7l-7IuDw3HCKsOX2Zapgj9ihgv7IJqwF6dsX0qFcAMp8U3iYxSJBYwmiC0Qx7l-y2BnKSIRo4CPM5PSViE1_xNN9g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Hamas has finally woken up to the power of lies. Like the PLO, Hamas
has learned that in this instance, words are more important than actions
by Bassam Tawil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Yasser Arafat may have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, but his PLO officials and he really deserve the prize for the art of deception. For decades now, the PLO has spearheaded one of history's biggest scams... and now it seems that Hamas, the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood movement, is about to join the bandwagon. According to unconfirmed reports in the Arab media, Hamas is about to publish a "political document" in which it "accepts" the "two-state solution." The purported document is already being hailed by some Western and Israeli analysts and Hamas apologists as a sign of the radical Islamic movement's march toward moderation and pragmatism. It is worthwhile to note that, contrary to what is being published in many media outlets, Hamas is NOT changing its Charter, which explicitly calls for the elimination of Israel...https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10213/hamas-new-charter
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Progress With The Board of Education
by Tom McLaughlin
tumblr_inline_mx98phDXsF1s2tx4q.jpg
{tommclaughlin.blogspot.com} ~Never have I been paddled, which is the method of corporal punishment still legal in nineteen states. I have, however, been slapped many times — by several teachers and by one principal. Those who have gotten the paddle, the "board of education," the method most common in those states, claim paddles with holes in them hurt more. I wouldn’t know, but I’ll take their word for it.
wfaa_taylor_santos.png
I think it was in fifth grade at St. William’s School in Tewksbury, Massachusetts that a spring storm delivered three inches of snow perfect for snowballs — and just before recess. Our principal, Mother Edward Mary, anticipated trouble. Prior to the bell for outdoor recess to begin, she announced over the intercom that there will be no throwing of snowballs. Then she stood at a 2nd floor window overlooking the playground with binoculars to identify violators. In twenty minutes, she’d written a long list, and my name was on it.
2009-07-20-144644nuns_on_the_run.jpg
Allowing time for us to return to our classrooms and put our boots and jackets away, she got on the intercom again to say, “The following boys will report to the cafeteria immediately: “Albert Brackett, Joseph Hedstrom, Thomas McLaughlin…” and about twenty others. All the classroom doors opened into the hallways and two dozen grim-faced boys filed silently down the stairs to the basement cafeteria where Mother Edward Mary told us to line up against the wall. “I told you not to throw snowballs,” she said. She approached the first boy, put the curled index finger of her left hand under his chin to lift his face to her, then slapped it — a stinging blow — with her right. She did the same to the second boy, and so on down the line. I was near the end.
4.gif
When she was done, I tried hard not to look at Al Brackett because if our eyes met, I knew we would both start laughing. It wasn’t that the slap didn’t hurt, because it did. It was the exhilaration of perpetrating a shared bit of mischief and enduring the consequence collectively. It’s what we did back then, when boys would still be boys. It’s one way we bonded. Mother Superior — that was her other title — did what principals did. She was the school’s leader and insisted that rules be taken seriously. We all got that — no hard feelings. Our parents treated us the same way and none of it diminished our self-esteem. The adults were in charge, and there was security in that.
09spanking-c1.jpg
From St. William’s School, some of us went on to Keith Academy in nearby Lowell where we had Xaverian Brothers as teachers. Strong as Mother Edward Mary was, most of them were stronger. I can attest that they hit considerably harder and only once can I say that I didn’t deserve it. Every other time, more than a dozen, I had it coming. Brother Dennis hit hardest, but we all liked him. He was fair, and he liked us too. He never said it, but we knew. I think he saw himself in us.
corporal-punishment-in-schools-how-to-avoid-7-638.jpg
Most of my friends went to public school and corporal punishment was common there too. One of the most respected men at Tewksbury High School was Joe Crotty. He was assistant principal in charge of discipline and my friends were frequent visitors to his office. If he closed the door, they’d get a thrashing, but they didn’t take it personally either. They all liked Joe. He had a job to do and he was fair. He liked them too and they knew it.
51_fig3.jpg
I suspect it’s much the same way in those nineteen states still allowing people like Mother Edward Mary, Brother Dennis, and Joe Crotty to do their jobs without threat of lawsuits. According to people calling in to a recent Laura Ingraham Show, students who misbehave were offered a choice: suspension or paddling. Most callers chose paddling because they could “get it over with quickly.” Others said they misbehaved because they wanted a few days off under suspension.
striking.gif
My first teaching job was a two-year stint at a private school for juvenile delinquents in Lowell They had been re-diagnosed under the new special ed law as “emotionally disturbed.” I never hit any of them, but I did have to forcibly remove some from my classroom when they refused to leave on their own. The age range was 14-18 and some were my size or bigger. If the big ones resisted there was a ruckus, but I always managed to deliver them to Dr. Herrmann’s office down the hall. He was a former running back at Kansas State. He would take them inside and close the door, just like Joe Crotty did.
30835f3ff68c213703ab9d287459f324.jpeg
That was in the mid 1970s and most states have “progressed” since then, banning corporal punishment. Schools are much better now, don’t you think?

Read more…

Wednesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Cowards of Academia
by Dennis Prager
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 How Conservative Is the European 
 'Right-Wing'? 
TRsRLXrOwvxF2iMTeywAUu4f83p99RNxuvMHWqfII2gXHqXyEJbWUzDI2zCVzncWInDm0GXTIjKHAe9s6et5NFymrVsBSCetYz4ZyNiFQIZ6yj5m1isLwp-snXsHuQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Brian Mark Weber: Since Donald Trump emerged as a viable candidate in 2016 and went on to win the presidency, other politicians in Europe have ascended in popularity including Marine Le Pen in France, Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, and Nigel Farage in Great Britain. Typically, the media have lumped together Donald Trump with just about any non-establishment European political candidate. So, thanks in large part to Leftmedia mischaracterization, most Americans simply assume these upstarts to be in the same grain as American conservatives.
          For example, in 2016 the Washington Post suggested that little separates Trump's rise in the U.S. from the emergence of populists in Europe, and that one of the primary threads tying them all together is an uneducated, aging support base that fears social change.
          There is certainly some truth to that — after all, Trump himself is definitely more populist and nationalist than conservative. But this narrative is a narrow oversimplification of what's happening. Certainly, European populist candidates have latched onto Trump's message by appealing to their own citizens weariness over migrant populations and eroding national sovereignty within the European Union.
          Marine Le Pen, leader of France's National Front party, is headed to a May 7 runoff for the French presidency after Sunday's vote. She's a 20-point underdog against globalist EU proponent Emmanuel Macron. Interestingly, neither establishment party advanced to the runoff. Le Pen regularly warns about the threat posed by immigration into France, saying, for example, "Mass immigration is not an opportunity for France; it's a tragedy for France." She promises to protect citizens from the dangers of unfettered immigration. But one issue alone is not enough to brand Le Pen a conservative.
          Trump applauded her, saying, "She's the strongest on borders, and she's the strongest on what's been going on in France. Whoever is the toughest on radical Islamic terrorism, and whoever is the toughest at the borders, will do well in the election."
          The issue of immigration alone seems to have forged an alliance between American conservatives and European nationalists, but there are more differences than similarities. Populist politicians in Europe are generally not in favor of deregulation or transferring power away from a centralized bureaucracy. Le Pen is all for big government. If anything her policies will result in France's government being more powerful and influential in the lives of the French, not less. And despite the media tall tale, she is far more likely to form an alliance with Vladimir Putin than is Trump.
          Ronald Brownstein writes in the Atlantic, "European populist parties share a common set of priorities focused on restricting immigration, unwinding global economic and political integration (by renouncing the European Union, and, for some of these parties, NATO as well), taking tougher steps to fight Islamic radicalism, and, in most cases, opposing cultural liberalism and secularization at home. On all those fronts, they view Putin not as a threat, but as an ally."
          Nonetheless, the symbolic power of the immigration issue has brought American conservatives and European populists together for the time being. Bill Wirtz and Casey Given explain in the Washington Examiner, "American alternative media outlets have been taken by Le Pen for months. Breitbart News has written about her at least 224 times. The site's editor-in-chief, Alex Marlow, even entertained the idea of establishing a Paris bureau for the website last November." Yet, other than publicly criticizing unfettered immigration into France, there is little that Le Pen has in common with American conservatives.
          And there's a risk in making bedfellows of politicians in Europe who appear conservative due to their tough talk on immigration but otherwise embrace a very left-wing political agenda. Categorizing European socialists as part of a right-wing ideology raises false hopes of a global conservative tide and prevents conservatives at home from staying focused on those principles necessary for limited government.
          Conservatives in the United States must be wary of getting caught up in any movement that doesn't move us closer to our conservative objectives. Andrew McCarthy writes in National Review that these goals shared by American conservatives are founded "in a deep understanding of why the Constitution's separation-of-powers framework and promotion of individual liberty are, in the long run, good for society. It is fantasy to believe these objectives will be helped along by populism. More reflective of a mood than a theory, populism is notoriously content to have big-government preening overrun limited-government caution."
          In short, the European "right" is nothing like the American right, in that we stand for liberty, constitutionally limited government, and truly free enterprise, while they stand for big government and the welfare state. The only reason they're lumped in with us is because people confuse nationalism with conservatism. There's plenty of overlap in interests, but the two terms are not synonymous. They like to tell us the Nazis (the National Socialist Workers Party) were "right wing," so anything feeding that narrative gets play. It all depends on how you define your terms, and we don't accept their definition.
          American conservatives and constitutionalists should not expect a wave of limited government policies to sweep across Western Europe anytime soon. Nor should we put our time, energy and efforts into buttressing left-wing politicians simply because they wave the flags of nationalism or talk tough on immigration, or because our media derides them as "right wing." That doesn't mean we shouldn't support European politicians who are intent on tackling some of the same problems we have here at home, but we need to reject the notion that Europe's supposed right wing is in alignment with American conservatism.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Hannity Fires Back: “I Won’t Be Silenced
by the Alt-Left’s Slander!”
jKjWl8wvgDF-cBMOz6s1K4mt1pxOBsGFmREipaccRXlEm6CagejeDOPckN7cBK1yljB2tK0FT5vZURCUG9aOLJAutqna6GEkmxrXtMkGPM--9vdeG1IFDWiaj4Ypj2LgaavSD5xDrmVS3ib2_sI1i7sb7yPRkjafj_m_vuc6JlTWGFjkuaM1HC7XCPXSWEiJDi0S0ll1e4ANcg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Keely Sharp
{eaglerising.com} ~ With Bill O’Reilly out of the picture, all the liberal sights seem to be on Sean Hannity. However, despite the target on his back, Hannity says he will NOT be silenced by the alt-left’s “vicious slander.”... It is refreshing to see him take a stand not refuse to let the slander slide any longer! The conservative host has been in radio for 30 years, and 21 of those years were with Fox News. He says he has endure numerous slander attempts and he has survived them all. What makes Liberals think that this will take him down? Maybe they should focus on their own, corrupt news anchors….like Rachel Maddow for example. Hannity released the following statement:...http://eaglerising.com/43137/hannity-fires-back-i-wont-be-silenced-by-the-alt-lefts-slander/
.
Ted Cruz Reveals Plan To Make Cartel Boss
“El Chapo” Pay For Border Wall
4heZ7rDXQK3i3StcsJq3BTf9sbMa4tKPBsWTOqi5snVaodBi5IanFFk499ouyngkejHKlFfPlbHtr9q33UX3lPSztbmlhR6WjeDQXDB0aIbQxwhk_ZH95K8spd4ds2B6zQS4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) took a major step towards completely taking the air out of the free-spending Democrats and RINOs’ newfound thrift that exists only in matters related to the blocking border enforcement... If the wall were labeled a renewable energy wall or a sustainable development barrier and painted green it might have a chance, as they’re used to approving projects with names like that without ever looking at the price tag. Dems and RINOs couldn’t care less about border security or its price, they just don’t want to interrupt the flow of illegal drugs and people into the country. Cruz has a plan to remove the price tag as a point of objection, leaving them further exposed as being simply politically motivated hacks. Cruz has introduced a bill that calls for $14 billion seized from Mexican drug cartel boss Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman to be used to fund the border wall between the U.S. and Mexico. Senator Cruz said in a statement, “Fourteen billion dollars will go a long way toward building a wall that will keep Americans safe and hinder the illegal flow of drugs, weapons, and individuals across our southern border.”...http://rickwells.us/ted-cruz-reveals-plan-make-cartel-boss-el-chapo-pay-border-wall/
.
DOJ: Court Decision Does Not Stop Effort
To Cut Funds From Sanctuary Cities
3Aff8lbO6E1OV7oH2Ro7NCfJWv1VKELXMTkRBBuBfWr7yl7tCq-NiV4LId_bCe5l7kTMEp59gVMgMZx4p7QhCp-n32DZlWdeoSb3k-s4IqXd8f1QinklCnFJwNShioR43gp7SR0mQQ2Wpnpoops8ZQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Alex Pfeiffer
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Department of Justice is not worried about a federal court decision Tuesday that temporarily blocks enforcement of Trump’s executive order that targeted federal funding of “sanctuary cities.”... A spokesman said the DOJ will continue on with its efforts to restrict federal law enforcement grants from jurisdictions that restrict the federal government from accessing information about the immigration status of an individual. The judge sided with the city of San Francisco and Santa Clara County, California, which both were worried about potentially losing billions in federal money. The DOJ lawyers argued that Santa Clara would have lost less than $1 million in funding. However, the judge said that the order was written too broadly. Orrick did uphold the government’s ability to enforce conditions of existing grants and 8 U.S.C. 1373, the federal statute which pertains to sanctuary cities...http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/25/doj-court-decision-does-not-stop-effort-to-cut-funds-from-sanctuary-cities/
.
Mike Lee Warns Trump About Taxpayer
Funding of Soros Groups Overseas
6PWHgj_nZs2NC4idJ1xCzx6biidgsFBiMmprICCaQ497vjU2q_qXkNxPsVvPEkiYiZSgQK3wIyrbJALAIcSuLDO2yKy8SLg1SbJqhuDzNNqGNnP2G52BA7E4CgcXyrA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Fred Lucas
{dailysignal.com} ~ For eight years, U.S. foreign assistance was tied to a leftist political agenda rather than American interests, and it’s now up to President Donald Trump to correct that, Sen. Mike Lee said Tuesday... Lee took particular aim at U.S. support during the liar-nObama administration for the overseas work of nonprofits bankrolled by liberal billionaire George Soros. “Whatever one’s views about abortion, energy regulation, alternative family structures, they are neither core international priorities of the American people, nor essential to American national security. They are domestic political controversies, pet causes of a sort of privileged, globalist elite,” Lee said in the speech at The Heritage Foundation...http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/25/mike-lee-warns-trump-about-taxpayer-funding-of-soros-groups-overseas?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpNNU1XRTVPVEV3TWpndyIsInQiOiJKOHJGSDVkenBDaDNhNGtwbFNsN2tDNVE5QWZkc2dFTWZZOHRaZkVUK2UwY3FNbnVPY2haTGcwazVOS2c2amZaVDdYbldlY1dWOUtCVFhHMnFIM3VXWlwvdGtubGRnSEV0UUoxNzUrMEdvS2NjVW9qNnNBQU9rejkrUTV2SHpGZUgifQ%3D%3D
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Cowards of Academia
YufvTWUuSDSa2qCQ9sEO3DAhuT9e_LOBSiNhvCO4e3DNt8chfHbHN1LWednhCCHOjtnxcQomrb0t9Gkx7bY5oAC9OaIMHFwmrgz98NrKAqsxHSbxNtH-X1q60PPELa_3HS6tx5V4velTVV1-tSEeuZoHe4R2=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Dennis Prager
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ Now that student mobs at universities around America and elsewhere in the West have silenced conservative speaker after conservative speaker, it has dawned on a small number of left-wing professors that the public is beginning to have contempt for the universities. As a result, a handful of academics at a handful of universities have signed statements on behalf of allowing "diverse" views to be heard at the university.


These statements are worthless.

While some of the professors who have signed them may sincerely believe that the university should honor the value of non-left free speech, one should keep in mind the following caveats.

First, the number of professors, deans and administrators who have signed these statements is very small.

Second, while no one can know what animates anyone else, it's a little hard to believe that many of those who did sign are sincere. If they are, why haven't we heard from them for decades? Shutting out conservatives and conservative ideas is not new. Plus, it's easy to sign a letter. You look righteous "Of course, I support free speech." and pay no price.

Third, these statements accomplish nothing of practical value. They are basically feel-good gestures.

If any of the rioting students read these statements — a highly unlikely occurrence — it is hard to imagine any of them thinking: "Wow, I really have been acting like a fascist, rioting and shutting down non-left-wing speakers, but now my eyes have been opened and I'm going to stop. Even though my professors have taught me that every conservative is a sexist racist xenophobic Islamophobic hatemonger, next time one of these despicable human beings comes to campus, I will silently wait for them to finish talking and then civilly ask challenging questions."

Thanks to left-wing indoctrination that begins in elementary school, most American students do not enter college as supporters of free speech. As reported in The New York Times on Feb. 7, 2017, a Knight Foundation survey found that only 45 percent of students "support that right when the speech in question is offensive to others and made in public."

If any professors want to do something truly effective, they should form a circle around a hall in which a conservative is scheduled to speak, with each of them holding up a sign identifying themselves as a professor: "I am (name), professor of (department)."

If just 1 percent of the professors on campus — that would mean just 43 faculty members at a place like UCLA — were to stand in front of the building in which a conservative was to speak, that might actually have an impact. If they were then attacked by left-wing thugs, other faculty members would be forced to take a position.

But it won't happen. It won't because the university is a particularly cowardly place. And it has been so for many decades. In the 1970s, when I was a graduate student at Columbia University, left-wing students took over classrooms and administration offices. But I recall no faculty members objecting; and the college presidents and deans, were, if possible, even more craven.

Ann Coulter was scheduled to speak this week at the University of California, Berkeley. Last week, the university announced it was canceling her speech, providing the usual excuse that it couldn't guarantee her safety, or others'. This excuse is as phony as it is cowardly. Berkeley and other universities know well that there is a way to ensure safety. They can do so in precisely the same way every other institution in a civilized society ensures citizens' safety: by calling in sufficient police to protect the innocent and arrest the violent. But college presidents don't do that sort of thing — not at Berkeley, or Yale University, or Middlebury College, or just about anywhere else. They don't want to tick off their clients (students), their faculty, leftist activist groups or the liberal media.

Under pressure, Berkeley's cowardly administration rescinded its cancellation and rescheduled Coulter's speech during the daytime during pre-finals week, when there are no classes and many students are not on campus. Coulter has rejected these changes and vowed to speak on the originally scheduled date.

So, next time you read a statement by some professors — virtually all of whom, remember, have been silent for decades — on behalf of allowing opinions other than their own to be expressed on their campuses, take it with a large grain of salt. It's primarily because some alumni are finally withholding funds from their closed-minded alma maters, or because the students they have produced have become so violent even the mainstream media can't ignore it.

Until they line up to safeguard people like Ann Coulter and stop teaching their students that conservatives are deplorable human beings, their open letters aren't worth the printer toner that prints them.
Read more…

Wed/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~

Is There Really a Retirement-Savings Crisis?
by Anne Tergesen

AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Top Headlines 
JD9npT1iA08nUfQHtc7WKYsQG49IVIp1T9X75t426x2N7pU7oQC4WCdjWCwa77bmwJhUBbZUImHHgANxzSXAKBHnXHdBPGiv2j-ga6oFdrmboUEHztFL1G_Yo9O81A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Sen. McConnell to assemble Senate at White House Wednesday for classified briefing on Pyongyang's nuclear sociopath, Kim Jong Un. (Fox News)
 
U.S. sanctions hundreds of employees of Syrian research center over chemical attacks. (Reuters)
 
Thanks to oil boom, McMullen County, Texas, now has the highest average adjusted gross income in the U.S. (Money)
 
After three months, Senate finally confirms Perdue as agriculture secretary. (The Washington Post)
 
It's official: Berkeley hit with lawsuit over Coulter lecture. (Washington Examiner)
 
Middlebury professor apologizes ... to rioters for inviting Charles Murray. (The Federalist)
 
Chelseamania! Could the latest extension of the liar-Clinton brand be good for U.S. politics? (The Wall Street Journal)
 
Democrats to pro-lifers: You are unwanted and may be discarded. (National Review)
 
Arkansas executes two inmates in one night, first state to do so since 2000. (Fox News)
 
Poll: More Americans now prefer a bigger government with more services to a smaller one with fewer services. (Pew Research Center)
 
Policy: The administration must change the liar-nObama narrative that policing is the problem. (City Journal)
 
Policy: "Communism for Kids" turns deadly ideology into a fairy tale. (The Daily Signal ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Democrats Oppose Border Wall
Because They Know It Will Work
xXgRLZMOYazYYULOqalDVKXctlPGfdt5O8pE_zk98A9dOeHX2UcH25tuYLl5TSqUUmP1BQLartwiE8r5QzMOcejQk1tLAcUS0CsugCD-200tfBSDBiT3EseshZqIJ9WutALyJkpAxp9nPecYNsg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ A clip of Attorney General Sessions starts the discussion with him making the point, “Throughout this whole process I’ve been saying that whenever you come up with anything that will actually fix the problems, that is what does not pass... They’ll pass anything as long as it doesn’t work. They’ll talk about fixing the border again and again and again, but when the chips are down, they back off.” Sessions says we’re close, “the American people have been asking for it for thirty years, it’s time for the politicians to deliver once and for all, and we can do it.” Tucker Carlson is asked if the administration is making their case effectively, that the border wall makes us safer. He indicates that is exactly the problem, that “they’ve made their case so effectively, as the Attorney General just said, nobody wants to pass it. He’s absolutely right, the main problem with the border wall is that it works.” “And that’s what it’s opponents fear,” says Carlson, “they’re not offering up any kind of substantive or principled opposition to it. It costs too much, really?...http://rickwells.us/tucker-carlson-democrats-oppose-border-wall-know-work/
Trump Attacks Dems Over Funding For
‘Badly Needed’ Border Wall
DkN55FNB4_Pdhwt0rXgx_yZovQk876BuHvnKGPJ9BObch5sr3xUJonDWwXN9awojoK9lo1eseLnWI53_uID5oWSe0iY7iG7EAfeN46lsps1qoRbsn378H8AWF2ocpeHvMZuErYX4RUo36B5ENldWjR5aqui0ucg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Will Racke
{dailycaller.com} ~ President Donald Trump went after Democratic lawmakers Sunday who have promised to reject an emergency spending measure that includes funds for a border wall... Trump’s clash with congressional opposition comes just days ahead of an April 28 budget deadline. He highlighted the issue in a pair of tweets, while top administration officials took to Sunday news shows to reiterate that wall funding remains high on the White House wish list for any bill coming out of Congress. “The Democrats don’t want money from budget going to border wall despite the fact that it will stop drugs and very bad MS 13 gang members,” Trump tweeted Sunday...http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/23/trump-attacks-dems-over-funding-for-badly-needed-border-wall/

.

Leftists turn on each other:
SEIU battles Hamas-linked CAIR
xiKmMseUsK7JsxsMHSlI0PBjmr7Na10QXAI9p0NFVAnZTu2gelK9D-_eLmpuqNZl1lren8sJJNbpRByD3PiF4IWQRsrwKzKyOD0NOqfXTPTyi0VLWug2fBB5ICMruJUh=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Robert Spencer
{jihadwatch.org} ~ Hamas-linked CAIR must be stunned by this, after growing accustomed to Leftist groups being eager and energetic allies, now this. And notice how, after years of calling itself a civil rights organization... it is now claiming to be a religious group, in order to deflect SEIU’s charges. “CAIR was formed in 1994 under the auspices of working to promote social, legal and political activism among Muslims in America.” In reality, “CAIR was incorporated by three leaders of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) — Nihad Awad, Omar Ahmad, and Rafeeq Jaber. Mousa Abu Marzook, the current deputy political chief of Hamas, served on the board of directors of IAP in 1989 and provided the group with $490,000. IAP, which is now defunct, was long a central player in Hamas’ U.S. support network while CAIR’s future founders controlled IAP...

.

Professor Claims NRA Is More
Dangerous Than ISIS
nPwigjsL42Vbtl7fog9_KNS3p7HQ1PeG8fKdD2Dmo494o1QLybXeAin0y76rd6a-aNl8pTc-WcqtJydSZIozXfFrn-OYxERrlgjxiVaW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 

by AWR Hawkins

{breitbart.com} ~ Notice how Kennedy went from incorrect information–the wrong founding date for the NRA–to unsubstantiated claims that the NRA wants to allow “possession and use of firearms just about anywhere by just about anyone.”... In reality, the NRA fights for the enforcement of the law and the prosecution of firearm-wielding criminals with a fervor equaled only by its defense of law-abiding citizens’ right to keep and bear arms. Kennedy’s language muddies the water and misses the point. Kennedy then claims the number of Americans killed by ISIS jihadists since 9/11 is nine. That is not a typo, he actually links to a Euronews source and claims only nine Americans have been killed by ISIS jihadists since the terror attacks on NYC in 2001...Kennedy is a liar and makes misleading information.http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/20/mo-school-of-journalism-prof-nra-more-dangerous-than-islamic-state/

.

Trump’s Border Wall Request
Equals 0.035% of Federal Spending
j8o81230B46KIbryPqA8Y5j9Q-NjdnMcHT7XovdLB89EUYw69KHL7UqH5iOpg55KxW1bEcjIPEbdbqKbbuONCtOyHOsStCObWa_NXgZlDYn9Rnrb2eH3P-AEi1Aq_am5-U8qb5FnLHfPzQYzNoAiDA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Terence P. Jeffrey

{cnsnews.com} ~ President Donald Trump’s request that Congress include $1.4 billion to fund the beginning of his proposed wall on the U.S.-Mexico border equals approximately 0.035 percent of what the federal government will spend in total this year... according to the latest estimate of fiscal year 2017 federal spending made by the Congressional Budget Office. It also equals less than the Department of Health and Human Services spends in just twelve hours and less than the Treasury collects in taxes in four hours. That is assuming that HHS spends money 24 hours a day and the Treasury collects it 24 hours a day...Then why is the dems and repub opposite to it? http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/trumps-border-wall-request-equals-0035-federal-spending?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkRBd1pqVTBOV1l5WlRRNCIsInQiOiJJbzd6VGlkT2tCUHdOcDRkSGdQSjVvSStJY2hNM0JDTFpDNmlBTGpCdG1LelZrUkppNDdhelI0R0V2Q1JpNXVOTkxEck95dVI2dmpcL0M5NzJSSnArazFPWEpGaW9SNWJiRCtFRlE0R1EzYm1ETXR0U2Y5YktUQXB1MjlnMGxYTzUifQ%3D%3D

.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

Is There Really a Retirement-Savings Crisis?Oq1Xh5Nm6vELVpLPQ2yplTb5CAShZbApwvSIoFsYx_TZMlrjFEIcyTKyjVxfAIkKVuRhFL7IckoGbibrfXQo75gwXceSUqCafs5efRebNQ087LWBt_70Y_dvSiiAWRHx448tp0g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by Anne Tergesen
{wsj.com} ~ The population is aging, Social Security’s trust funds are expected to be depleted in 2034, and the median household headed by someone age 55 to 64 has little more than $100,000 in retirement savings.

But are large numbers of Americans facing a retirement crisis? Will they suffer a substantial drop in their standard of living in later life?

Experts, it turns out, are sharply divided on the answer to this key question.

When the Washington, D.C.-based center convened 19 experts to recommend ways to improve the nation’s retirement security, the group ultimately agreed to disagree on the crisis question.

To shed light on the topic, The Wall Street Journal invited two prominent economists to share their thoughts, and differences, in an exchange of emails. Alicia Munnell, director of Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research, argues that the outlook is alarming. Andrew Biggs, resident scholar at the nonprofit American Enterprise Institute, contends that most Americans are doing just fine.

The two of them, friends and past collaborators, “have read the same literature and looked at the same data” but have come to very different conclusions, observes Ms.. Munnell. Here’s an edited transcript of their conversation.

Do we or don’t we?

WSJ: Do we face a retirement crisis?

MS. MUNNELL: Yes. Our National Retirement Risk Index [the NRRI], based on data from the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, shows that about half of today’s working-age households won’t be able to maintain their preretirement standard of living in retirement. The reason is simple: We need more income because we are living longer and continue to retire relatively early. But we will get less from traditional sources. And interest rates, which determine how much income we can draw from our nest eggs, have fallen to historic lows.

Under current law, Social Security replacement rates are being gradually reduced as the age at which you can claim full benefits rises from 65, for those born before 1938, to 67, for those born after 1959. Because Social Security faces a long-term deficit, benefits could be cut further.

In addition, traditional pensions are rapidly disappearing. While 401(k) plans could be an effective replacement if employers automatically enroll employees at high savings rates, today these plans are clearly falling short. For households nearing retirement that have 401(k)s but not necessarily IRAs, the typical total balance in their retirement savings is only $111,000.

Even worse, only about half of private-sector workers participate in any kind of employer plan at their current job. This coverage gap is a serious problem, because—outside of workplace plans—Americans save virtually nothing.

WSJ: Andrew, what’s your take?

MR. BIGGS: A “retirement crisis” is when inadequate savings cause large numbers of households to face a substantial drop in their standard of living in retirement. That is not going to happen.

Yes, some studies show most Americans falling short. But others show fewer Americans falling short, and smaller shortfalls.

Seniors have the lowest poverty rates in the population. Three-quarters of retirees tell Gallup they have enough to live comfortably. There is no evidence that retirees are cutting discretionary spending like entertainment or charitable contributions, which you’d expect if they were running short of money.

In addition, more working-age Americans are saving for retirement than in the past. While people are wistful for traditional pensions, never more than 40% of workers ever had one. Today, the Social Security Administration finds that 61% of all workers, and 80% of married couples, are saving in a retirement plan. Most households who should be saving for retirement are saving.

Federal Reserve data show that from 1981 to 2016, the total balances of 401(k)s, traditional pensions, IRAs and other retirement plans rose to 153% of GDP from 58%. Yes, some Americans are undersaving. But a crisis? If we didn’t have one in 1981, when savings were one-third the current level, we don’t have one today.

Continuing reading at this link below:
Read more…

Wed/Mid-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Agenda for the Trump-Abbas Meeting
by Caroline Glick
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Shame On Dems Putting Drug Cartels,
And Scofflaws Above Americans
niP8uDAdX4BYjHjFHVdPqz4DGLdnouNwkxMwYqfrpsODDCwionUziq6EEZrcQryxuN9XSaI48awLF7357FbdeZVTtOMbmnviV95eLL2LXYIjcDCtaVgKNLsI4g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs has a few thoughts “on a country changing, certainly the United States is no longer a sanctuary nation, certainly not the one the Bush and liar-nObama administrations tried to create... President Trump’s executive orders and his policies have been influential in cutting illegal immigration by as much as seventy percent over the past two months.” “And now,” Dobbs points out, “the Trump administration is making preliminary funding for the border wall a top budgetary priority. Mr. Trump tweeted this today, ‘The wall is a very important tool in stopping drugs from pouring into our country and poisoning our youth and many others! If the wall is not built, which it will be, the drug situation will never be fixed the way it should be.” Dobbs says, “Attorney General Jeff Sessions, pointing to the economic benefits of a secure border.” He plays a clip of Sessions on “This Week” describing the billions of dollars in savings, the reduced drug influx and detention facility occupants...
.
Is Israel planning to strike more Lebanese
sites in next Hezbollah war?
rizpF70Xk1TKaFmyF2buCw1TKxVB3H3u51RO72V3gqG1E4mWsff2yixfJJ5w4RIKyEwR507dqQBpJDY4zSk53OA5kFug6XEZVtL9hHbU6t469Ij1dQ10KAkuFYk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Yonah Jeremy Bob
{jpost.com} ~ The IDF Military Advocate General Brig.-Gen. Sharon Afek hinted strongly on Tuesday that he will approve a wider range of Lebanese targets than were approved in the 2006 Lebanon War in the event of a new war with Hezbollah... Speaking at a Ramat Gan conference of military Judge Advocate General (JAG) officers from as many as 20 countries around the world, Afek said that “Hezbollah’s integration into state institutions raises questions of state responsibility.” All of this is in the context in which Israel’s newer foes like Hezbollah “create operational and strategic challenges by the fact that they directly target civilian populations, act in urban environments and make ground operations necessary in order to locate their military assets,” said Afek...
.
Blackouts Hit LA, New York, San Francisco –
Was It Cyberattack?
38VX_DNZWsR0vOJTs8MVbaEc5YLhiKYfJy0zIQOEzANmj-R84d8pr7PCZvKc0G8rZz3UY37e6mWGq9Sn1UgkVxmLr7RipBQtXO0hqLGqwL1xBCpygcf5Co1Z7N66pmBqK8rqLrUQuq4s8U4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Caleb
{preparedgunowners.com} ~ The U.S. power grid appears to have been hit with multiple power outages simultaneously affecting San Francisco, New York and Los Angeles... There is no official word on what caused the simultaneous blackouts to three of America’s biggest cities. The official word is that it’s all a coincidence they occurred at the same time. Many wonder if it’s a cyberattack by our nation’s enemies. Apparently, the government is also running something called “Operation Gotham Shield” – which is leading many to believe these blackouts may have been a part of the government led drill/false flag of some sort …http://preparedgunowners.com/2017/04/25/blackouts-hit-la-new-york-san-francisco-was-it-cyberattack/
 
.
Punish Legislators Who Insist on Open Borders
mSYYGW8USdWQXRXp6f3355Cibo01ilw1k4H5AKQuWGSlBxT6W8N0_GZjnqjyFOZZR7gHd_lX4PH32yZEyYzVg4qx1oIViV_dWndNaz4HRCaUi150j5JcPg5MZ4A1bJ4pBTtVPMoJxA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by Frank Gaffney, Jr.
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ After the Democrats' drubbing in the 2016 election, one would have thought they would be reluctant to oppose Donald Trump on his signature issue of securing America's southern border... The public wants it done, and made Mr. Trump president to do that. In addition, congressional Democrats had previously voted to build the wall. But now, Democratic legislators are saying they'll shut down the government, rather than approve funding for this purpose. Perhaps that's in part because they know the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill doesn't want to see Mr. Trump's promise fulfilled, either... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/punish-legislators-who-insist-on-open-borders?f=must_reads
.
Turkish jets bomb US-backed forces
in Iraq, Syria, US officials say
{foxnews.com} ~ More than 30 U.S.-backed Syrian and Iraqi Kurdish fighters were killed in a series of airstrikes carried out by Turkish jets on Monday, two American defense officials confirmed to Fox News... Dozens of fighters were also wounded in the strikes. Both officials said there were no U.S. troops among the fighters who were hit. “This is very serious,” said one outraged U.S. official. U.S. and Russian troops in the areas of the attacks were warned about an hour before 24 Turkish jets and two Turkish drones bombed locations in northern Iraq and northeast Syria. Senior Russian officials contacted U.S. counterparts to try to get Turkey to back off the strikes, but those pleas were ignored by the Turks, officials said...
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Agenda for the Trump-Abbas Meeting
by Caroline Glick
{truthrevolt.org} ~ The day after Israel celebrates its 69th Independence Day, US President Donald Trump will greet PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas at the White House. The date of their meeting, May 3, is notable not least for its timing.

The timing of the meeting presumes a linkage between the establishment of Israel and the establishment of a Palestinian state. This is not merely obnoxious, it is also blind to reality.

In reality, an independent state of Palestine has existed for the past 12 years in Gaza. Rather than build that up and declare independence, Abbas and his comrades surrendered Gaza to Hamas in 2007.

Hamas, in turn, transformed independent Palestine into a base for jihad.

Abbas’s failure to declare independence in 2005 – and the subsequent failure of his US-trained forces to defend their control over Gaza in June 2007 from Hamas terrorists – is generally overlooked. But it is critical that Trump understand the significance of his behavior before he meets with Abbas.

Since the inception of the peace process between Israel and the PLO in 1993, the professed goal of the PLO has been to establish an independent Palestinian state on any territory over which it was able to take control from Israel. Yet 12 years ago, when Israel withdrew its citizens and military from Gaza, the PLO refused to take responsibility for the area insisting ridiculously that Gaza was still controlled by Israel.

Then 10 years ago, US-trained PLO forces fled to Israel rather than defend their control of Gaza when Hamas took up arms against them.

There are, it seems, two main reasons for Abbas’s behavior. The first is directly related to how he understood Israel’s decision to withdraw.

In December 2003, then-prime minister Ariel Sharon stunned the country when he adopted the platform of the Labor Party – which he had just massively defeated in the general elections – and removed all Israeli communities and military installations from Gaza, including from the border with Egypt, by the end of 2005.

Israeli society was nearly torn apart in the one year and eight months between Sharon’s surprise announcement and the expulsion of Gaza’s Jews in August 2005. The media hemorrhaged with continuous propaganda that demonized the Israeli residents of Gaza and the religious Zionist community in general.

A reminder of that toxic period came earlier this month, when Haaretz published a column by veteran reporter Yossi Klein in which he alleged that religious Zionists posed a graver danger to the State of Israel than Hezbollah.

Abbas and his lieutenants viewed the domestic chaos that engulfed Israel at the time as proof of Israel being on its way off the stage of history.

If this was how Israelis reacted to the destruction of 21 communities in Gaza and four in northern Samaria and the dispossession of 10,000 Israelis, it was clear to Abbas and his comrades that Israeli society would collapse if Sharon carried out his plan to reenact the Gaza withdrawal tenfold in Judea and Samaria after the 2006 elections.

Why accept Gaza if all of Israel was about to be destroyed – by its own hand? The second reason that Abbas didn’t declare independence in Gaza, is because he had no interest in being held accountable for his behavior – as leaders of independent states are. If he accepted sovereign power, then the Palestinians as well as Israel and, presumably, the rest of the world would be able to hold him to account for what happened within the territory he controlled. His ability to blame Israel for his failures would be diminished, at least in theory.

Far better, Abbas concluded, to pretend that Israel’s withdrawal was meaningless and blame Israel for his failure to govern his own territory.

Both reasons for Abbas’s rejection of responsibility over Gaza are important because they also reflect the views of the Palestinians as a whole.

Dan Polisar, from Shalem College, summarized in a recent article in the online magazine Mosaic, his study of more than 400 public opinion surveys of the Palestinians in Judea, Samaria and Gaza taken by professional pollsters over the past 23 years.

Like Abbas in 2005, the overwhelming majority of Palestinians believe that Israel isn’t long for this world.

In one 2011 survey, for instance, a mere 23% of Palestinians said they were certain that Israel will continue to exist 25 years hence. 44% were certain it would not.

The fact that more than three quarters of Palestinians are uncertain if Israel will survive is not only a function of Israel’s own self-destructive behavior – it is premised as well on Palestinian ideology.

The vast majority of Palestinians reject Israel’s right to exist. Indeed, a mere 12% of Palestinians believe that Jews have ties to the land of Israel.

Polisar showed that, whereas a plurality to a bare majority of Palestinians accepts the premise of a twostate solution, the overwhelming majority reject any deal that would leave Israel intact as a viable state capable of defending itself. Equally importantly, 68% of Palestinians believe that even if a Palestinian state is established in Gaza, Judea and Samaria with Jerusalem as its capital, they should continue to aspire to Israel’s destruction.

In other words, even if the PLO signs a deal with Israel that says the conflict has been resolved, for 68% of Palestinians the conflict will continue. They oppose ending the education of their children to seek Israel’s destruction and accepting Israel as a peaceful neighbor.

This then, brings us to Trump’s visit with Abbas, the day after Israel’s 69th birthday.

What does he intend to discuss with Abbas? From media reports, it appears that Trump intends to discuss the Palestinian Authority’s subsidization of terrorism to the tune of $300 million each year, which it pays out as salaries to terrorists in Israeli prisons and as stipends to their families.

In an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News earlier this week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu urged Trump to hold Abbas to account for his massive budgetary outlays to terrorists and their families. He asked that Trump demand as well that Abbas stop the PA ’s indoctrination of the Palestinians to seek the annihilation of Israel and the murder of its citizens.

This is well and good. But it seems a bit beside the point. The point is that 69 years ago, the Jews established our state. A Palestinian state was not established then or since, not because Israel was unwilling for such a state to come into being, but because the Palestinians refuse to accept Israel’s right to exist.

If any good is to come from Trump meeting with Abbas – on May 3 or at any other time – then he should send the following message to Abbas and to the rest of the world.

To date, the US has supported the goal of Palestinian statehood, because it convinced itself that the Palestinians were interested in a state that would live at peace with Israel. The US pressured Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians in order to encourage them to accept Israel. And the US funded the PA thinking that doing so would advance the cause of peace. It trained and armed PA security forces for the same reason.

To date, the Palestinians, the PLO and the PA have not lived up to their side of the bargain – on anything.

They have not come to terms with Israel’s existence; they have not abjured terrorism; and they have not accepted responsibility for the areas under their control, either in Gaza, or in Judea and Samaria.

Since his is a new administration, Trump is willing to give Abbas the benefit of the doubt for three months. In that time Abbas needs to stop all financial transfers to terrorists and their families – in and out of prison; he needs to change the names of all the public sites now named after terrorists; and he needs to purge all anti-Jewish content from his PA -controlled media and mosques.

If Abbas fails to do all of these things by August 3, then the Trump administration will abandon its support for Palestinian statehood and its recognition of the PLO.
Read more…