Rudy Tirre's Posts (5090)

Sort by

Saturday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Conservatives Are Happier, More 
Generous Than Liberals
OquiNyPbMkqE_vm4gckSWGxbJmUO2rnkaFKNZHEA04EXAvxxsCUiaWV56Rr4dl1yr3dQywqCIX72FxZdZ1f_3W9_xuceXxaq6LUZ9HI6ETLC_i7bzZBWN1tbfOXJ2vloc4UTwQeU9M9ACq1YLkTMuQUGoY13AqgnGMUHJno=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Louis DeBroux
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
'That's what he wants': Republicans see Mark Meadows angling for White House chief of staff
Wf5yLnUFAPq29NGHux6Dzhy_FdVuIjBV631hU60vEtW6OrfXndRalqfwHy4RzOqHQSZJj1SWWlYm831j3P5fNlITtkg3_sW10LkREx7vAlr8VkozbIPih8_sCX0a8v3jxTkwdioUPC0S8QEb1QLxvek-Ht0ykKoGRFl98-iAUDNuzvWLeTJqNzjvq7ikt2Tcc8h9L2f638Rm_FpR_FCnOHHrYzmqLNnLxfiNK6jQCfDkq5GFo0TkQXAh7wn3UhF_NxPyTSghDM_DucdLFq0wX7wHTqwAcq8vWwgYppPixeTtcq42WijKraQGXW2PsjTI0ohENrD4A6OxxiFKepmb5nSWDg1FLx1sCFbDBKrF1Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by David M. Drucker
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ There is growing talk on Capitol Hill that Mark Meadows is angling to become the next White House chief of staff... amid signs President Trump has been unhappy with the current acting holder of the position, Mick Mulvaney. The conservative Republican congressman in recent days accompanied Trump to New York to attend a mixed martial arts fight and then joined the president a couple of days later for a campaign rally in Lexington, Kentucky — trips and locales with no connection to the Republican congressman’s western North Carolina House district. Meadows, like Trump, was a real estate developer before entering politics and has played a key role in defending the president against impeachment. Trump recently declined in a Washington Examiner interview to say he was happy with Mulvaney's performance. This, as well as the trips and Meadows's frequent presence in the White House, is leading some Republican aides and lawmakers in the House to believe the congressman is auditioning to become chief of staff. “Of course that’s what he wants,” a Republican congressman told the Washington Examiner, requesting anonymity in order to speak candidly. At least one White House aide shares that opinion. After Meadows interrupted an MSNBC reporter on live television to reject suggestions that Republicans are having a hard time defending Trump against the Democratic allegations of abuse of power that form the basis for impeachment, one Mulvaney ally texted the Washington Examiner with the clip of Meadows on MSNBC, along with a message that read, “Still interviewing for the job.” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham declined to comment for this story. Meadows said there is nothing out of the ordinary to draw from the extra time he has been spending with the commander in chief. “He is not feeling me out for chief of staff,” the congressman said this week. Meadows noted he was not scheduled to travel with Trump this weekend to Tuscaloosa, Alabama, where the president is expected to attend the Alabama-LSU college football game. Meadows, 60, is playing a critical role in the House Republican effort to undermine the Democratic case for impeachment, which centers around a telephone conversation Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The president asked Zelensky to open an investigation into loose lips liar-Joe Biden, the former vice president, and his son, Hunter Biden. Democrats charge that Trump threatened to withhold U.S. military aid from Kyiv unless Zelensky complied...  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/thats-what-he-wants-republicans-see-mark-meadows-angling-for-white-house-chief-of-staff?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_11/08/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261  
.
Deeper Partnership With Israel Can 
Help U.S. Solve Defense Dilemma
ltdXT9gLWlxaYCOA_MesjODokl5HLgbGaTg7O-lYvMnhTlxoYjVssQffGWrWlswtigVgyq-5W3_qLDeIkGs836fGZx3WY6MuaWbbvT2b51ZgizIxVAU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Bradley Bowman and Andrew Gabel
{ fdd.org } ~ The U.S. military is very busy these days. The Department of Defense wants to focus its finite resources on great power competition with China and Russia... but persistent threats from Iran and Islamist terrorists demand continued attention. How can the Pentagon address this dilemma? Strengthening Washington’s security partnership with Israel in areas of military doctrine and weapons development may provide part of the answer. The 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS) made an admirable effort to establish clear priorities. “Long-term strategic competitions with China and Russia are the principal priorities for the Department,” it concluded. Furthermore, the NDS stated unequivocally, “Inter-state competition, not terrorism, is now the primary concern in U.S. national security.” Yet, as much as some might like to focus exclusively on great power competition, the NDS itself also acknowledged persistent threats from Iran and terrorist organizations. “In the Middle East, Iran is competing with its neighbors, asserting an arc of influence and instability while vying for regional hegemony, using state-sponsored terrorist activities, a growing network of proxies, and its missile program to achieve its objectives,” the NDS assessed. Tehran’s activities over the last few months underscore these concerns. The NDS notes, “… threats to stability remain as terrorist groups with long reach continue to murder the innocent and threaten peace more broadly.” Islamist terrorists are far from defeated. Without constant pressure, seemingly tactical terror threats can quickly become strategically devastating for the United States. Another 9/11-style terror attack emanating from the wider Middle East—perhaps this time with a weapon of mass destruction—could kill tens of thousands of Americans and require the diversion of military resources needed for great power competition. Clearly, the United States has to be strategically competent enough to win the global great power competition and defend its interests in the Middle East. This is easier said than done, however, as Washington’s resources are limited, even with recent increases in defense spending. General Mark Milley, the new Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified in July that the United States seeks to counter terrorism and maintain a favorable balance in the Middle East by training, advising, assisting, and enabling partners, as well as through foreign military sales. This is an essential and potentially cost-effective, “economy of force” approach to U.S. strategy in the Middle East. But to focus resources on China and Russia and address persistent threats in the Middle East, the United States needs to identify additional steps—particularly following the Trump administration’s abrupt withdrawal in Syria. One such step might include deeper doctrinal and weapons development collaboration with America’s closest ally in the region, Israel...  https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2019/11/07/deeper-partnership-with-israel-can-help-us-solve-defense-dilemma/   
The Left Doesn’t Really 
Believe ‘No One Is Above the Law’
wyAwRZJASjOl_fgrSa644xKsjs-ROW3WgUyqigp8zPUGlrZya5VeeZyTcKuvV5RUcUBHjEqZKh6v5YYclolrZS9hOhGdZzXe8nkU0gZOjzvlrpOoX9kFhtFsCg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Rep. Andy Biggs
{ dailysignal.com } ~ There is a two-tiered system of justice in America, and it isn’t necessarily defined by rich versus poor, or on racial grounds. Rather, if you’re a Democrat favorite of the deep-state bureaucrats, you will be treated favorably... If you’re a Republican who supports President Donald Trump, or if you’re Trump himself, you will be routed by the institutions of the left. The inconsistencies of liar-Nancy Pelosi and her followers demonstrate this completely. “No one is above the law,” the House speaker told late-night TV host Stephen Colbert last week. She said the same thing back in September. Earlier in the year, she punctuated her declaration by saying, “No one is above the law, especially the president of the United States.” She seems to have made no exceptions in her declarative statements. But she is not alone in the wide assortment of those attempting to remove Trump via a procedural coup. liar-Pelosi is joined by House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who said in December of 2018, “No one is above the law, not even the president of the United States.” Perennial presidential hopeful and unindicted former Secretary of State scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton tweeted in June, “I don’t know who needs to hear  this, but the president is not above the law.” Yet, as columnist Marc Thiessen wrote in July, Democrats don’t really believe that. Take illegal immigration, the prime example of Democrats blatantly disregarding the law with no consequences. If you are an illegal alien in the United States, Democrats want to give you special treatment. Your first time illegally in the country is a misdemeanor, and an illegal reentry after removal is a felony...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/11/07/the-left-doesnt-really-believe-no-one-is-above-the-law/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-left-doesnt-really-believe-no-one-is-above-the-law?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTURJM05ERXhabVkzWm1FMSIsInQiOiJMb2JUd2t3bHg2YnVwTHErU05Gb3RIanI4bGRscWoxbzZEdm5EWW5qYXN6dmd0VUk3eUJGWFwvS2xjRkdoXC9NUDgrTjNXYVJTWUJDY3JMVU56TngxU05JS1YrXC9OV0wzaXRpcU1kT1F3NDRsZDZXRDQ3V290c0dQVGI4WDR3M3lTeCJ9  
.
House Democrats Release Deposition Of 
White House Official Who Listened To 
Trump-Zelensky Phone Call
st2yz8cuOYvFPuaG-sem2YB3ihZps5paAEH0y92Yh0miQNQ9aOl3V9hIVfQpfuWY556rJnuoMcLAKw8-9dtJ52ijaL33IthpDmyF-8xI4Kr4ktWbL95XeMnvJe4VhYjj_Sj_HoXckrSmmcjLJN31FMW6a53UqyqUNjdtxXlPaA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Chuck Ross 
{ thepoliticalinsider.com } ~ House Democrats on Friday released deposition transcripts for Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Dr. Fiona Hill, two national security experts who are considered to be key witnesses... in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump. Vindman, the director for European affairs at the National Security Council, was deposed Oct. 29, while Hill, who served as the White House’s top Russia expert until she left the post in July, was questioned Oct. 14. Vindman was one of two officials deposed so far to have listened in on the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that is at the center of the impeachment inquiry. Vindman testified that he had serious concerns that Trump asked Zelensky to open up politically charged investigations into allegations that loose lips liar-Joe Biden pressured Ukraine’s former president to shut down an investigation into an energy company linked to his son, Hunter Biden. Vindman, who received a Purple Heart for injuries sustained in the Iraq War, said he believed Trump’s remarks undermined U.S. national security. He also testified that he raised those concerns with John Eisenberg, the top lawyer on the National Security Council. Hill expressed concerns that Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani operated an unofficial diplomatic channel between the Trump administration and Ukrainian government officials. She told lawmakers that John Bolton, the former national security adviser, described Giuliani’s involvement in Ukraine issues as a “drug deal.” Vindman’s testimony, which Democrats called damning for Trump, was somewhat nullified by a deposition given by Timothy Morrison, who also listened in on the Trump-Zelensky phone call. Morrison, who served on the National Security Council before filling Hill’s vacated position, said he “was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed” on the phone call...  https://thepoliticalinsider.com/house-democrats-release-deposition-of-white-house-official-who-listened-to-trump-zelensky-phone-call/?utm_campaign=TPI1082019afternoon&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_medium=email&utm_content=4b4ea4948726422aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=TPICI
.
New York Fines Trump 
$2 Million for Helping Veterans Charity
wh3OiHhujb9ZZ4pt3I7wjIM5aDivFUdiCjT5q8jZJYU1xnZD0lrIfDv1r0oO0QmA-yVyn51OwjMX2q4Zwz2ME8hqWafkw6CmXCL1Zg1cCOCMpoP74KTlQnTn9hEz8Ad8Q0XECIg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Matt Palumbo
{ bongino.com } ~ bA New York judge has ruled that President Donald Trump must pay a $2 million judgement for improperly using his Trump Foundation to advance his 2016 presidential campaign – but in reality... Trump is being punished for a technicality. That’s in contrast to how liberals are trying to portray the event. As CNNput it in their reporting: “The order and settlement bring an end to questions that first arose during the 2016 campaign about whether Trump used money raised under the guise of charitable work for political gain. The resolution puts the President in the unusual position of having to pay millions in damages while in office, at a time when he faces a large number of other personal legal battles. Filed in June 2018, the lawsuit alleged that the President and his three eldest children — Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric — violated federal and state campaign finance laws and abused the Donald J. Trump Foundation’s tax-exempt status. According to the lawsuit, the Trumps allowed the foundation to be used ‘as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump’s business and political interests.'” In reality, this lawsuit was setoff by the following series of events: Ahead of the 2016 Iowa caucus, candidate Trump held a fundraiser. The fundraiser raised $2.8 million, which was all given to veterans charities. The funds were raised through the Trump Foundation, but campaign staff managed the fundraiser and distributed the funds to charities. Liberals decided that these funds counted as campaign contributions zero percent of which went to the Trump campaign, and a judge agreed helped “further Mr. Trump’s political campaign.” One hundred percent of the money raised went to charity, and the Trump campaigned covered the entire cost of administering distribution of the funds. But because giving millions of dollars to veterans tends to be good PR for a presidential candidate, a judge decided that this helped further the Trump campaign. So for his efforts to help veterans, Trump was rewarded with a $2 million fine and the billionth bogus media narrative to plague his presidency. Maybe one day the media will discover what the scumbag/liar-Clinton Foundation is.
.
Next Generation of Americans Will Embrace Socialism If We Lose ‘War on History’
mHYZWhf8FwJju1eETlpdS96-8C1GYBGWpRnrkzs0Itf78rj42RdJ2IdDvOznkkM7cUXX3LoghEmhPPxNKDWED83NYDshGhEn98TIQjiEfcYVCdNRhlvS2_2EVH3hpGwUmEla=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jarrett Stepman
{ dailysignal.com } ~ As young Americans are losing an understanding of civics and American history, they increasingly embrace socialism... An annual poll conducted for the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation again found that the younger generations have a far sunnier view of socialism and communism than their elders. Some of the findings from the YouGov survey, released Oct. 28, were deeply worrisome. According to the poll, 70% of millennials responded that they are likely or extremely likely to vote for a “socialist.” About 50% said they have an unfavorable view of capitalism. Incredibly, the poll found that “15% of millennials think the world would be better off if the Soviet Union still existed.” Seventy-six percent of respondents “are unaware that the Hitler-Stalin pact started World War II,” the poll found. The Soviets, of course, began World War II as an ally of Hitler, only switching “sides” after the Nazis attacked the Soviet Union. Nevertheless, a victory for the Soviet Union without the presence of the United States would have likely begun a new dark age as horrifying as a world under the thumb of Nazi Germany...
.
JW Videos of the Week
Did Associated Press Work W/DOJ to Target Trump Associate Paul Manafort?
Mexican Drug Cartels How Far is Their Reach?
.
State Department/Deep State Enemies List Targeting Trump Allies Confirmed?
.
scumbag/liar-Clinton Email Cover-Up CONFIRMED--Her Lawyers Don't Want JW to Question scumbag/liar-Clinton!
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Conservatives Are Happier, More 
Generous Than Liberals
OquiNyPbMkqE_vm4gckSWGxbJmUO2rnkaFKNZHEA04EXAvxxsCUiaWV56Rr4dl1yr3dQywqCIX72FxZdZ1f_3W9_xuceXxaq6LUZ9HI6ETLC_i7bzZBWN1tbfOXJ2vloc4UTwQeU9M9ACq1YLkTMuQUGoY13AqgnGMUHJno=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Louis DeBroux:  Where are the happiest, most generous people in America to be found? The answer might surprise you!
 

Lefty author and radio personality Garrison Keillor captured the popular view (at least according to Hollywood and the media) of the differences between liberals and conservatives, claiming, “Liberalism is the politics of kindness,” standing for “tolerance, magnanimity, community spirit, [and] the defense of the weak against the powerful.” Conservatives, Keillor claims on the other hand, are people who “stand for tax cuts, and further tax cuts, annual tax cuts,” and then they “use their refund to buy a gun and an attack dog” to keep people away who are not like them.

Or, as scumbag/liar-nObama put it, these are the people who are “bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them.”

As it turns out, that is the exact opposite of the truth.

Last year, the Social Psychological and Personality Science journal published the findings of a study by University of Southern California researcher David Newman. He analyzed the happiness of 50,000 people from 16 countries over a 40-year period.

What Newman’s team discovered is that conservatives are consistently and significantly happier than their liberal counterparts, and the more conservative a person is, the happier they are. Social conservatives are even happier than just fiscal conservatives, and both are much happier than liberals. Why? Because “there is some unique aspect of political conservatism that provides people with meaning and purpose in life.”

This was true for conservatives “at all reporting periods (global, daily, and momentary).” In other words, conservatives tend to be happy as a general rule, and not just when things are going well for them. That is extremely significant. It means their happiness is related to who they are inside, rather than being a reaction to their circumstances.

Of study participants, 52% of conservatives were “completely satisfied” with their family lives, compared to just 41% of liberals and moderates. Conservatives were also significantly more likely to believe marriage is “essential in creating and maintaining strong families,” and overwhelmingly more likely to be married (62% vs. 39%).

Considering the vast data on how marriage greatly increases overall happiness and well-being, economic stability, improved physical and mental health, and life expectancy, this is a game-changer.

In 2012, the Journal of Research in Personality analyzed four studies on happiness, and found “conservatives expressed greater personal agency (e.g., personal control, responsibility), more positive outlook (e.g., optimism, self-worth), more transcendent moral beliefs (e.g., greater religiosity, greater moral clarity, less tolerance of transgressions), and a generalized belief in fairness, and these differences accounted for the happiness gap.”

In the U.S., where leftists gravitate toward the Democrat Party and conservatives to the Republican Party, these mindsets and ideologies are clearly manifest in their messaging. As one writer put it, “Republicans … preach the message of limited government, responsibility and self-reliance, while Democrats … preach a message of victimhood and entitlement. … The former is empowering and the latter is debilitating, tending only to provoke feelings of resentment, anger, and helplessness.”

This supports the findings of a Pew Research Center study showing that Republicans maintain higher levels of happiness across all income levels, so it’s not just those evil, rich Republicans swimming in their pools of cash who are happy.

Additionally, conservative Republicans are nearly twice as likely to be “very happy” as liberal Democrats (47% to 28%), and regular church attenders were nearly twice as likely to be very happy as those who rarely or never attend.

Conservative, Christian Republicans are also far more generous than their liberal Democrat counterparts, regardless of income level. And for those who think religious conservatives only donate to charity to get the tax write-off (which makes no sense because you don’t get a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes), religious conservatives also donate more of their time (which could be spent making more money) to charity than liberal Democrats. In the 2012 election, 17 of the most generous states voted for rino-Mitt Romney, while 15 of the least charitable 17 went for Barack scumbag/liar-nObama.

If you are a liberal Democrat, these findings probably offend you. You may think this is “fake news” and recall the widely broadcasted study that supposedly found Republicans have more psychopathic traits than Democrats. Numerous liberals/Democrats pointed to the study as proof that conservatism and religiosity are manifestations of mental illness.

Yet while this study’s findings were headline news when the report was issued, the retraction a short time later was barely mentioned. Go figure.

After being called out, researchers were forced to admit they screwed up the calculations, and the results were just the opposite of what they claimed: “The descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed.” In other words, the data showed that it was liberals, not conservatives, who were most likely to be associated with psychoticism.

Of course, common sense and personal observation will confirm this. It is not conservative, Christian Republicans who are rioting and assaulting those who disagree with them, or fire-bombing cars, smashing store windows, and showing up at private homes and threatening families and terrifying children. That would be “progressive” Democrats, who feel their violence is justified by their morally superior cause.

So if you find yourself unhappy, aimless, and without purpose, there is an easy fix — don a MAGA hat and head to church!   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66595?mailing_id=4635&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4635&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body 

Read more…

Saturday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Importance of 'No-Men'
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Cal Thomas
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Difference Between 
scumbag-Schiff and Shinola
prRk4CPzbYWQxdA1qebgXQowy5WkUV4_hqzmRKmXFiA-bLDGMW3JO9voJjJQe4DQa4bQyE0_78seW2oHopy8LG8ssx9cEzt3bDh1Df-kHodT9YP0MbbjnqpoajxfoQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by DAVID CATRON
{ spectator.org  } ~ The moment House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi chose scumbag-Adam Schiff to be the point man for the House “impeachment inquiry,” the effort to create a credible case against President Trump was doomed... The overarching case the Democrats have made against Trump is that he is a deeply dishonest man and this fundamental flaw in his personality has inevitably manifested itself in a variety of impeachable offenses. This was the primary theme of the Russia collusion hoax, and it is the basic narrative underlying the Ukraine scandal. Consequently, the decision to put a man of scumbag-Schiff’s well-documented mendacity in charge of the inquiry was a colossal blunder. Before Russiagate collapsed, scumbag-Schiff claimed to have seen “ample evidence of collusion in plain sight.” That assertion turned out to be a cynical lie, of course. Then, when an anonymous bureaucrat filed a complaint concerning President Trump’s conduct during a July call with Ukrainian President Zelensky, scumbag-Schiff emphatically stated that neither he nor his committee had prior contact with the “whistleblower.” This misrepresentation was too much even for the Washington Post, which awarded him four “Pinocchios.” Worst of all, he fabricated part of the Trump–Zelensky transcript as he opened a hearing to investigate the matter. It’s hardly a surprise, then, that scumbag-Schiff’s impeachment inquiry has not exactly been a model of transparency. Closed-door hearings, selective release of transcripts, and leaks of deceptively edited testimony have exacerbated public uncertainty about scumbag-Schiff’s honesty. This lack of transparency has stunted the growth in voter support for impeachment that followed the whistleblower complaint. A recent Suffolk University/USA Today poll found that only 36.2 percent of registered voters favor impeachment. As for scumbag-Schiff’s credibility, a new Monmouth  survey reveals that 73 percent of voters have little or no trust in the conduct of his inquiry. Nor has scumbag-Schiff’s credibility been enhanced by his attempts to hide the identity of the whistleblower. Having repeatedly said that the House Intelligence Committee would interview this individual, scumbag-Schiff reversed himself. He  appeared on Face the Nation and claimed that President Trump had been “threatening the whistleblower” and that it had become necessary to protect the identity of the mystery witness for safety purposes. This is nonsense. Federal law protects whistleblowers against retaliation, but it doesn’t guarantee anonymity. This individual’s lawyer has nonetheless threatened to sue anyone who reveals his client’s name: Not many are taking that threat seriously, however. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul told Fox News anchor Bret Baier on Tuesday, when asked about the legality of revealing the whistleblower’s identity, “There’s nothing that prevents me from saying it.… There’s no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who’s been said to be the whistleblower.” Sen. Paul continued, “I think he should be interviewed not as the whistleblower, but as a material witness to the loose lips liar-Biden corruption in Ukraine.” There is some doubt as to whether this individual is a “whistleblower” as the term is legally defined. As attorney and author Gregg Jarrett writes, To put it plainly, there is no whistleblower statute that permits an unelected and inferior federal employee to blow the whistle on the president, the most superior officer in the U.S. government.… Article II of the Constitution gives the president sweeping power to conduct foreign affairs, negotiate with leaders of other nations, make requests or solicit information. The Constitution does not grant the power of review, approval or disapproval to bureaucratic employees. Indeed, the whistleblower law explicitly excludes a complaint involving “differences of opinion concerning public policy matters.”...   https://spectator.org/the-difference-between-schiff-and-shinola/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=2c0cd2d8f7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_06_02_45_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-2c0cd2d8f7-104608113   
GOP's Jim Jordan moved to intelligence 
panel for public impeachment hearings
06OdkGYmEZjZdBBtgBDBuWmrTZS9KagH4BImOTUvfhaGbuZHJXxWw-R0fafrdw3c20WJ-nvdhs8uRXkR7vrcwq30cm6QfxMDq2iy5jVYyzKTC1ME6OAtPrZcV-3HY4XZSfB9fpCh2FM7Rh0UtTpN29F-_QSPnOfSFL0N7KuIdro-Beu-4k2Wl7A3hJa3kxnT0f70Qc10KjJp3ByyArSCkNmV1QjtxYfFCnmqW-PYXmglPug5-S6pqHZFV3rMKy4Waw4Ovu4So-rmdsdTPcmUm16Lg6TB-8TuKNWvYABODcguQwGmE2XWtLqa-7Ez5g-arxzFwjdjog=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Susan Ferrechio
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~  The GOP’s top lawmaker on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will temporarily take a spot on the intelligence panel while it holds public impeachment hearings... Republican leaders decided Friday to move Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio to the House Intelligence Committee, where he will serve a key role cross-examining witnesses selected by Democrats, who control the majority. Rep. Rick Crawford of Arkansas is temporarily stepping aside to make room for Jordan on the intelligence panel. "Jim Jordan has been on the front lines in the fight for fairness and truth," House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California said in a statement. "His addition will ensure more accountability and transparency in this sham process.” Jordan has defended President Trump against charges he misused his office to get Ukraine to investigate former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden. Jordan has also been critical of the closed-door impeachment proceedings and limitations on GOP participation in the process. Democrats have scheduled hearings to begin on Wednesday with the testimony of acting Ukraine Ambassador William Taylor, who told lawmakers in a closed-door deposition that he believed Trump was holding back security aid in an effort to get Ukraine to investigate loose lips liar-Biden.   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/gops-jordan-moved-to-intelligence-panel-for-public-impeachment-hearings?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_11/08/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261   
Abuse of Power: When LBJ Spied on Goldwater
k3mvOgeAsKeBPZ4qXMhCDUap3VBl-77pMPiy90tqJtqoL_EExjn8j13tMg8etMorzgki3NcwySBUh16laa5TCHb5JndjIul_VnD42he2sIxs3bN4nSlRfA2tkptFp7EAQHLv6h9PvZV6k_omJ7j4UXVpdKogH363FT7l5NjGwmc1gY11_Dcdyz_P3UwF5x5PgfA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by PAUL KENGOR
{ spectator.org } ~ Liberals bellyache over what they call “whataboutism.” It’s a handy tactic they’ve embraced to counter conservatives who remind them of unseemly things their icons have done in the past... for which liberals conveniently look the other way. They want to talk about Donald Trump and Russian collusion, and we have the audacity to remind them of the hard evidence a literal KGB memo of what their “Lion of the Senate,” Ted Kennedy, did with the Russians, which they dutifully ignored throughout Kennedy’s life. They find one insulting albeit questionable statement from Ronald Reagan and they begin removing his name from buildings, while they ignore a litany of offensive remarks and actions from icons ranging from Woodrow Wilson to Margaret Sanger to scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton. Heck, old Maggie gets a pass for speaking to the KKK in May 1926. We bring up really offensive things that they dutifully ignore. We say, “well, what about this?” and they cry foul — at our reminders. Well, too bad. Their ability to ignore the sins of their guys and gals is truly appalling, especially when they make mountains out of every molehill they try to uncover with Republicans. Donald Trump’s situation with loose lips liar-Joe and Hunter Biden and the Ukraine is merely the latest exhibit. Here again, we could give example after example of their favorite Democrat presidents abusing the powers of state. Pick your poison, progressives: FDR? Kennedy? LBJ? Let’s go with LBJ today. As liberals dig furiously for evidence of an abuse of power by President Trump against a Democrat presidential rival, let’s hop into the time machine for a history lesson of what President Lyndon Baines Johnson did to Sen. Barry Goldwater in anticipation of the 1964 presidential race. What LBJ did has not been bothered with by liberal journalists or historians, whose job is to ignore those transgressions. The few sources to address LBJ’s Goldwater malfeasance have been conservative ones. That’s all the more reason for liberals to quit reading now and cover their eyes. Most recently, LBJ’s shenanigans against Goldwater were addressed in Mark Levin’s new book, Unfreedom of the Press. In turn, Levin has mentioned it on his radio show. Prior to Levin, one needs to go back a decade to the work of conservative historian Lee Edwards. A longtime professor at Catholic University of America and scholar in residence at the Heritage Foundation, Edwards wrote the first biography of Ronald Reagan, way back in 1967 — Reagan’s first year as governor. Prior to that, Edwards worked on the Goldwater campaign and was a firsthand witness to what was going on. He became one of the first biographers of Goldwater. And before Edwards’ reporting on LBJ’s mischief beginning over a decade ago, Barry Goldwater himself alluded to it in his 1988 memoir — though it was Edwards who most extensively uncovered and detailed what happened. So, what did LBJ do? Edwards wrote a piece in June 2005 titled “Lyndon Johnson’s Watergate,”  posted at the website of the Heritage Foundation, long before anyone could conceive the words “President Donald Trump.” There he wrote, It was a political scandal of unprecedented proportions: the deliberate, systematic, and illegal misuse of the FBI and the CIA by the White House in a presidential campaign. The massive black-bag operations, bordering on the unconstitutional and therefore calling for impeachment, were personally approved by the president. They included planting a CIA spy in his opponent’s campaign committee, wiretaps on his opponent’s top political aides, illegal FBI checks, and the bugging of his opponent’s campaign airplane. The president? Lyndon B. Johnson. The target? Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona, the 1964 Republican presidential candidate...  https://spectator.org/abuse-of-power-when-lbj-spied-on-goldwater/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=2c0cd2d8f7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_06_02_45_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-2c0cd2d8f7-104608113   
Netanyahu appoints Bennett as 
defense minister; Likud, New Right to unite
wYs_c4HapQRfJ8o2COv40rQ64PxgT7Pr6FYzVY-vkFhIgXYFwCo28VgJi0ZgcDUvFgSHyL1eQxgljSkkeZypFo0ZBzjVahIZ5XgYCYf0RH9SGNpg5Tn9zeSaWBIkifk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday offered New Right party leader Naftali Bennett the position of defense minister... in a move widely seen as a bid to prevent Bennett joining a Blue and White-led government. The premier’s Likud party said Netanyahu, who is also defense minister, met Bennett in the morning, during which the prime minister extended the offer. The appointment will be voted on at the next cabinet meeting, the party said. New Right accepted the offer, said party number 2 Ayelet Shaked, adding that Netanyahu had offered it a choice of two smaller ministries, from Agriculture, Diaspora Affairs and Welfare, or just Defense. “I am convinced this is correct for the state of Israel,” she tweeted. Bennett and Shaked famously gave Netanyahu an ultimatum in 2018, threatening to pull out of his government if Bennett was not appointed defense minister, but ultimately backed down when Netanyahu called their bluff. Bennett has relentlessly criticized the government’s handling of violence from Hamas-run Gaza, demanding a harsher response, both when he served in the coalition and subsequently. The current appointment is temporary. “Bennett agreed in the event that a new government is formed, such as a broad unity or a narrow right-wing government, another person will be appointed to the position of defense minister,” the Likud statement said. Likud also said it and New Right would “immediately” become a joint faction in the current Knesset, meaning that they would vote together as a united faction but not actually merge parties, the statement said...
.
U.S. Senate confirms Washington County 
Judge Danielle Hunsaker for 
9th Circuit federal appeals court seat
oKiPYRj-8-1Rz4-aWXvxsisXnl7p1hKRW_eQzv7wBocLwFMfZmbW15WOJjL9PM8h-aCx8A-GOcVPb7OKO2gw2cU62JlpdOpT2B20ZepYlucvuOIrjylQ6a0NHxYlDt4Rii3cGrMWPb63ZewXIkEHJ02Fq_Q9wqiN4wwsMwq5reabVigRRsTAdpWXYtpxQWlcrguq5zeRw8YhoRf5X4FLYRYhPBEOGWpt4VcwGPrrC1EvWP3PBONMgKHwZMk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Maxine Bernstein 
{ oregonlive.com } ~ The U.S. Senate on Wednesday confirmed Washington County Presiding Judge Danielle J. Hunsaker to fill a vacant seat on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals... The Senate, without discussion, voted 73-17 to confirm Hunsaker, who had the support of only one of Oregon’s two Democratic senators. Sen. Jeff Merkley last week said he wouldn’t vote to confirm Hunsaker, saying she lacked experience for the lifetime post. Sen. Ron Wyden gave his support, saying he believes she has "displayed the judicial temperament'' needed for the position. Hunsaker, 42, was one of four names that Wyden and Merkley had forwarded to the White House for consideration after the senators vigorously opposed the last nominee for the seat, federal prosecutor Ryan Bounds. Bounds’ name was suddenly withdrawn from consideration in July 2018 when it became clear the Senate didn’t have the votes to confirm him. In August, President Donald J. Trump nominated Hunsaker to fill the court vacancy. Gov. Kate Brown appointed Hunsaker to the bench in 2017. She previously was a partner at Larkins Vacura Kayser law firm in Portland, where she practiced civil and appellate litigation in state and federal court. Hunsaker had clerked for 9th Circuit Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, whose seat she will fill. O’Scannlain assumed senior status in December 2016. After graduating from the University of Idaho College of Law, Hunsaker served as a law clerk to Judge Paul J. Kelly Jr., of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and for Oregon  District Judge Michael W. Mosman. She later clerked for O’Scannlain...  https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2019/11/us-senate-confirms-washington-county-judge-danielle-hunsaker-for-9th-circuit-federal-appeals-court-seat.html   
.
Fox News bans hosts from using name 
of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella
6i5e3bUMr96_G2Y5e0I5538vjF34kj5DjSCdxsOWT3j1EozWArirJkmudmSqta16OTXmKnb7DGciRACqqK6Ejrgn89--ZX0CQGuzTWfktOpiTixVm6c6XiE7mq2aKpdCfo6cTg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by John Gage
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ A Fox News executive sent an email directive to its staff that the network had not confirmed the name of the whistleblower and therefore did not want hosts naming... who they thought the whistleblower is. The email, sent by a company executive and obtained by CNN on Wednesday, dictated that hosts were not to name the whistleblower, and production staffers were commanded to "not fulfill any video or graphic requests" in connection to the whistleblower's identity. The ban includes Fox's prime-time hosts who have all largely supported President Trump. Hannity claimed this week that he had "multiple confirmations" of the identity of the whistleblower who is at the center of the Trump impeachment debate. The Fox News host blamed the whistleblower's lawyers and threats of lawsuits rather than Fox News executives for the reason he was not divulging the name. The lawyers for the whistleblower told the  Washington Examiner they never threatened Hannity with a lawsuit. One Fox News anchor, Howard Kurtz, defended not releasing the name of the whistleblower, saying it would send a "chilling message" to whistleblowers in the future. Some conservatives and media outlets have speculated that Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower that accused Trump of offering Ukraine a quid pro quo. The lawyers for the whistleblower have called any attempts to name the individual "the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless." Thats BS Fox.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Importance of 'No-Men'
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Cal Thomas
 

Shortly after Jim Bakker’s release from prison in July 1994, I invited the disgraced TV evangelist to my home. There was an important question I wanted to ask him.

Some background: Bakker and his “Praise the Lord” (PTL) associates sold $1,000 “lifetime memberships” to people who were promised annual three-night stays at his Heritage USA luxury hotel complex in Fort Mill, South Carolina. According to what prosecutors revealed at his trial on fraud charges, Bakker sold tens of thousands of these memberships for a hotel that had only 500 rooms planned and was never completed. It was alleged Bakker kept $3.4 million of the money for himself and the rest paid for Heritage USA’s operating expenses.

“When did you start to go wrong?” I asked Bakker. His answer was instructive: “When I began to surround myself with people who told me only what I wanted to hear.”

I thought of that statement when I read a comment by former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, who told a gathering in Sea Island, Georgia, sponsored by The Washington Examiner, what he had said to President Trump before leaving his position: “I said whatever you do, don’t hire a ‘yes man,’ someone who won’t tell you the truth – don’t do that, because if you do, I believe you will be impeached.”

The latest White House Press Secretary, Stephanie Grisham, sounded like a “yes-woman” when she responded to Kelly: “I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great president.”

The key to great leadership is to not overly regard yourself, to understand you don’t know everything, realize that, like everyone else, you are flawed and can make bad judgments, and to surround yourself with people who think well enough of you to tell you the truth from their perspective, even when it disagrees with yours. As long as the objective is to help you succeed with your agenda, such advice can be valuable and even humbling, humility being one of humanity’s better characteristics and a grace that appears in short supply in Washington.

Another story along these lines was told to me by one of the late Billy Graham’s associates. After a particularly successful evening during which thousands came forward in response to an invitation to receive Christ as Savior, Graham and his team went back to their hotel room. The aide said he told Graham, “You’re not as great as they think you are.” He said Graham responded, “Don’t I know it.”

Some of those evangelical “advisers” to President Trump might consider a verse with which they must be familiar. It is from Proverbs 15:22: “Plans go wrong for lack of advice; many advisers bring success.”

Israel’s King Solomon is said to have written that and most of the Proverbs, which are as good a guidebook for living (and leading) as has ever been written, even for non-believers.

Generals require committed privates in order to achieve success in warfare. Presidents need the same, along with staff who don’t always tell them what they want to hear, but sometimes what they need to hear.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66577?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Friday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Trump Defends Religious Liberty
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions
Endorses Trump In First Campaign Ad
To Reclaim Senate Seat
dRPFakAsdLifXUhHWk6Qcj7miTjxEJiej9bkNIkF1vaA8qVAY11DQqqRIFvEbb_HIzRLcCpAYYO_e1NjwfclcrmFB5Vy72UK51lgoAe3iW3sVocz5OgxgckRLS6b84hsk9h1rg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Tristan Justice
{ thefederalist.com } ~ Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions officially entered the race to reclaim his old Alabama Senate seat Thursday, releasing a new ad endorsing his former boss who fired him last November:.. President Donald Trump.In the 30-second ad, Sessions noted the fact that he has refrained from criticizing the president as others have after leaving the administration. “When I left President Trump’s cabinet, did I write a tell-all book? No. Did I go on CNN and attack the president? Nope,” Sessions says in the opening of the segment. “Have I said a cross word about our president? Not one time.” Sessions argued that it would have been “dishonorable” to do so, adding that he fully backs the president despite being ousted in the administration following escalating tensions between the two throughout Sessions’ tenure leading the Justice Department. Sessions served 20 years in the Senate before leaving in 2017 to serve as the attorney general, only to be fired two years later, a day after the 2018 midterms. The president was upset when Sessions recused himself from anything related to the Russia investigation where Trump was wrongly accused of being a Russian agent. The seat eventually flipped to the Democrats after Sessions’ successor, Luther Strange, lost a Republican primary to former right-wing State Judge Roy Moore. Former U.S. attorney and Democratic nominee Doug Jones ultimately defeated Moore in the special election. Now, Sessions is joining a crowded field of candidates to reclaim his old seat, including Moore, Rep. Bradley Byrne, Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill, and Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville. While tensions between Sessions and Trump likely remain high, it would have been unwise for Sessions to buck the president in Alabama, where Trump remains popular with a 59 percent approval rating in the state, the highest net approval rating for the president of any state in the union at the time of the poll’s release in October. Sessions was the first U.S. senator to endorse Trump in the 2016 election cycle...
.
The Democrats and CAIR
kmYPtsirFzpDwXRXG46uaz5zOODzpO79bM9NKttmomZzfbzhwRiOFG0xN3caGoBmSFKKBFQ-HrjRXh8_D5l3HW7V8LrI-30NTkNREG0rLjQrCHVrpfA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Eileen F. Toplansky
{ americanthinker.com } ~ In 2018, Democratic lawmakers and a few Republicans openly supported the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), congratulating the organization on its 24th year of operation...   Furthermore, sixteen likely Democrat presidential candidates are endorsing CAIR. For instance, "Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren sent in a video message threatening to cut off aid to Israel unless it surrenders to Islamic terrorists. Then she promised to divide Jerusalem, turning half the ancient holy city into a killing ground for the murderous terrorists already occupying Gaza and portions of the West Bank." Thus, the majority of the 2020 Democrat presidential field have aligned with CAIR, an anti-American and anti-Israel organization. Moreover, it is now patently clear that the "Democratic party's celebration of Linda Sarsour… exposes the poison" that has enveloped the party.  Consequently, there are representatives of the United States Congress who are openly applauding an "entity of the Muslim Brotherhood linked to pro-Hamas operations in the U.S."  From its inception, CAIR has sought to "portray itself as a moderate, mainstream organization," but nothing could be farther from the truth. Instead it "promotes a radical Islamic vision demonstrated by its co-founder Omar Ahmad" who has said Islam 'isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran… should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.' In a similar spirit, co-founder Ibrahim Hooper told a reporter in 1993: 'I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.' In 2003 Hooper stated that if Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, which they deem superior to man-made law. Ihsan Bagby, a former board member of CAIR, believes that Muslims “can never be full citizens of America... because there  is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country.” Islamic supremacism as espoused by this group is taught in many American mosques which teach hatred of Jews and Christians. In fact, "Tashbih Sayyed of the Council for Democracy and Tolerance (CDT) called CAIR 'the most accomplished fifth column' in the United States since its desire is to  '...spread Islamic hegemony the world over by hook or by crook.'" According to Kamal Nawash, although CAIR condemns terrorism on the surface it "endorses an ideology that helps foster extremism," because "almost all of their members are theocratic Muslims who reject secularism and want to establish Islamic states."  CAIR had been named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an alleged criminal conspiracy to support both Hamas and the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF)...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/the_democrats_and_cair.html   
How Russia could force 
a nuclear war in the Baltics
NaPDq3Riag_VxW3qNzyxM-_4n0TBA7dswMybQeIyKqlYP1XddwTnDOGA67cpTZSKNOOw4aoLhMKCx-CD_UH3fVuZKX7f1NaDnJbf6xKzkLE6JeoU3Liae0PPnnJQuwi-=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Hal Brands
{ aei.org } ~ Would the US fight a nuclear war to save Estonia? The question would probably strike most Americans as absurd... Certainly, almost no one was thinking about such a prospect when NATO expanded to include the Baltic states back in 2004. Yet a series  of reports by the nonpartisan RAND Corporation shows that the possibility of nuclear escalation in a conflict between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Russia over the Baltic region is higher than one might imagine. The best way of averting it? Invest more in the alliance’s conventional defense. There was a time when it seemed quite normal to risk nuclear war over the sanctity of European frontiers. During the Cold War, NATO was outnumbered by Warsaw Pact forces, and it would have had great difficulty stopping a Soviet attack with conventional weapons. From the moment it was formed, NATO relied on the threat of nuclear escalation — whether rapid and spasmodic, or gradual and controlled — to maintain deterrence. American thinkers developed elaborate models and theories of deterrence. US and NATO forces regularly carried out exercises simulating the resort to nuclear weapons to make this strategy credible. After the Cold War ended, the US and its allies had the luxury of thinking less about nuclear deterrence and war-fighting. Tensions with Russia receded and nuclear strategy came to seem like a relic of a bygone era. Yet today, with Russia rising again as a military threat, the grim logic of nuclear statecraft is returning. The spike in tensions between Russia and the West over the past half-decade has revealed a basic problem: NATO doesn’t have the capability to prevent Russian forces from quickly overrunning Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Russian invaders would be at the gates of the Baltic capitals in two to three days; existing NATO forces in the region would be destroyed or swept aside. NATO could respond by mobilizing for a longer war to liberate the Baltic countries, but this would require a bloody, dangerous military campaign. Critically, that campaign would require striking targets — such as air defense systems — located within Russia itself, as well as suppressing Russian artillery, short-range missiles and other capabilities within the Kaliningrad enclave, which is situated behind NATO’s front lines. Moreover, this sort of NATO counteroffensive is precisely the situation Russian nuclear doctrine seems meant to avert. Russian officials understand that their country would lose a long war against NATO. They are particularly alarmed at the possibility of NATO using its unmatched military capabilities to conduct conventional strikes within Russian borders. So the Kremlin has signaled that it might carry out limited nuclear strikes — perhaps a “demonstration strike” somewhere in the Atlantic, or against NATO forces in the theater — to force the alliance to make peace on Moscow’s terms. This  concept is known as “escalate to de-escalate,” and there is a growing body of evidence that the Russians are serious about it...
.
24K Voter Records in Florida County 
Contain Errors, Potential Fraud
i8RHYDrg-yt8qYuy9XLRUKX5KO-2uW1oPyFFzeUksfHHSjqoj9zWXb52AlK7ZXRQSqSvJ6Z1guR4g6QF55faIZ1rTqW4nOgtl-ylAwAlXyuLyVO9xQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Joe Schoffstall 
{ freebeacon.com } ~ An election integrity watchdog has found 24,000 instances of irregularities among the voter rolls in Palm Beach County, Fla., according to a new report... The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), a group that litigates to protect election integrity, discovered double voting by the same registrants, double registrants across state lines, deceased voters on rolls, and apparent noncitizens previously registered to vote in Palm Beach County following a three-month investigation involving office visits, records inspections, and voter roll audits. The findings raise concerns in the swing state one year out from the 2020 elections. It was Florida's election results that sent the 2000 presidential race between George W. Bush and scumbag-Al Gore to the Supreme Court. Palm Beach County itself faced massive criticism as recently as the 2018 midterm elections when it could not finish three state-mandated recounts by imposed deadlines. The events led to the county's supervisor of elections, Susan Bucher, being ousted from her position and the implementation of a $15 million voting overhaul. "Concerns ranged from apparent clerical errors memorialized in voter records to evidence of dead and double voting," PILF's report states. "Seemingly unlawful claims of business and government addresses were also found used as residential ones. Some individuals unwillingly or otherwise even demonstrated an ability to register multiple times under the same name, address, and date of birth thanks to human or computer system errors between the county elections office and Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles personnel. Perhaps most alarming of all, apparent noncitizens were documented registering to vote in Palm Beach County—sometimes while admitting their immigration status on voter applications." The group ultimately discovered 225 instances of double voting by the same registrant in 2016 and/or 2018; 20,479 double registrations across state lines; 68 uses of nonresidential addresses as county residences; 2,203 deceased voters on the voter roll; 139 instances of records of deceased voters casting ballots; 413 names appearing more than once on the county's voter roll; and 68 apparent noncitizens previously registered to vote for a total average length of seven years...   https://freebeacon.com/issues/report-24k-voter-records-in-florida-county-contain-errors-potential-fraud/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=edb748e168-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_07_07_01_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-edb748e168-45611665   
Congress Seeks to Sanction Officials From 
Countries Holding Americans Hostage
0XQ0k7p7OMfdbjqdbM0AMr8GBG5dn4mbb_ZDOw8Ji2EbJ3Za9JW_Ulu6SgdSlFKZKmx8Dx_xhAEOTscsxusueNHKdLxzpJwsSTcp2o_Xn74MIeE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Adam Kredo 
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Congress is considering new legislation that would require President Donald Trump to sanction any foreign government official involved in holding Americans hostage... a move that would prevent these foreigners and their family members from obtaining U.S. visas, according to congressional sources working on the bill. Sens. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) and Ted Cruz (R., Tex.) are spearheading the new legislation, which they say will apply needed pressure on any foreign government complicit in the taking of American hostages. A key mechanism in the legislation would ensure that foreign officials involved in hostage taking and their families do not enter the United States. Many foreign officials and their family members from Iran, China, and other rogue nations routinely travel to the United States for lavish holidays and education at U.S. colleges. The lawmakers are seeking to crack down on this behavior. Cruz recently found himself at the center of a diplomatic standoff with Tehran after it banned him and prominent Trump administration officials from traveling to Iran. Cruz, at the time, proposed legislation to reciprocate the ban, saying that the family members of prominent Iranian regime figures should not reap the benefits of the American education system. Cotton and Cruz are frustrated by what they see as foreign officials from rogue regimes taking advantage of American opportunities while U.S. citizens languish in captivity...
.
Calif. Taxpayers on Hook for 
Six-Figure Government Pensions
iW6ucrHgPpVExbAPTr1fCFYpU5mCFhuJdG5-5M272NL-D-cO3PIYklNOa6Sm5vmqX77tEk7Ju9RtDjJW_NkwC255UEgiejMPvMN63fR0hkOUkPmDIDO3NplTcatBVWVDdhQwUYu6LA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Yuichiro Kakutani
{ freebeacon.com  } ~ Nearly 80,000 Californians collected six-figure taxpayer-funded pensions in 2018... as retirement costs leave half the state's cities at "high risk" of serious financial distress, according to an analysis. Transparent California, a free-market think tank, found that 6 percent of retired government workers collected more than $100,000 in 2018, an 85 percent jump since 2013. Those payouts represented 20 percent of the $51.7 billion in total pension payments. Taxpayers spent a record-high $40 billion to cover the costs of public sector retirees in 2018, the report also found. The median household income in California is $75,277. The six-figure payouts propel thousands of retirees into the top 38 percent of all earners in the state, according to census data. About 1.2 million people received pension checks in 2018, including a retired deputy police chief who collected  nearly $1.5 million in 2018. The increasing costs could push residents to a "breaking point," according to Robert Fellner, executive director of Transparent California. Local and state government agencies will have to raise taxes to cover costs or cut public services to pay people who are no longer working. "You keep raising your sales tax to fund pensions, you are obviously pushing residents to a breaking point," Fellner told the Washington Free Beacon. "The public services speaks for itself. You see the homelessness and stuff going on, and it's a really bad situation."...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump Defends Religious Liberty
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
 

The Trump administration announced Friday afternoon that it was rolling back an scumbag/liar-nObama-era regulation that tied the hands of faith-based organizations involved in adoptions and foster care efforts.

In recent years, conservatives have grown increasingly alarmed as Catholic Charities and similar groups have closed their doors as various left-wing states and cities have forced them to choose between their values and their desire to serve their communities.

The Department of Health and Human Services announced last week that it would no longer enforce the scumbag/liar-nObama regulation that expanded nondiscrimination protections beyond existing law and Supreme Court rulings. 

In a statement, HHS declared that it would “require grantees to comply with applicable nondiscrimination provisions passed by Congress … including legislation ensuring the protection of religious liberty, and … all applicable Supreme Court decisions." 

In other words, organizations that receive federal grants only have to comply with provisions that are part of existing federal law, not provisions that the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and its left-wing allies created on their way out the door in 2016.

The new Trump regulation will prevent government bureaucrats from discriminating against faith-based organizations that believe children deserve mothers and fathers. 

Once again, the Trump/Pence team has demonstrated its commitment to the rule of law and to religious liberty.

A Partisan Abuse of Power

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz is a self-identified liberal Democrat. He voted for scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton in 2016. He defended scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton against impeachment in 1998. And he’s adamantly opposed to what Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats are doing today in their attempt to impeach President Trump.

In his latest opinion piece, Dershowitz warns that the current impeachment effort is a raw partisan power grab, exactly what our founders like Alexander Hamilton feared most. Consider this excerpt:

Hamilton warned of the "greatest danger” that the decision to move forward with impeachment will “be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties than the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.”

Meanwhile, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy suggests that opponents of impeachment need to move beyond process arguments and start making the case for why Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president is not an impeachable offense. President Trump did nothing wrong. 

As we have repeatedly noted, there is significant evidence of foreign involvement in the 2016 election, including between elements of our Deep State and the security agencies of other countries. That’s what U.S. Attorney John Durham is investigating. 

We know that elements of the Ukrainian government played a major role in all of this. We know that former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden was assigned responsibility for managing Ukrainian foreign policy. We know there are issues of corruption involving his son. We know loose lips liar-Biden had his own quid pro quo with Ukraine, demanding the firing of a top prosecutor. 

The left-wing media desperately doesn’t want any of this to get traction.

The Left’s Agenda

Montgomery County, Maryland, is all in on the left’s agenda, including the anti-police mentality that dominates the left. Here’s the latest example.

James Shelton and his young son created a wooden Blue Line flag to honor Montgomery County police officers on National First Responders Day. The officers expressed their appreciation to Mr. Shelton and his son, and said that the wooden flag would be displayed in their station. 

Opponents of the flag claim that it has been appropriated by white nationalists and is racist. Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich branded the Blue Line flag “divisive” and “a symbol of dismissiveness” and ordered police not to display the flag.

Montgomery County, Maryland, has always been liberal. But this shows just how extreme it has become. One of the left’s favorite chants in recent years is, “Cops and the Klan go hand in hand.” It’s disgusting and absurd, especially when today’s police force is the most racially diverse in the history of our country.

But once again, we see how the left is taking normal conservative impulses, like support for law enforcement, and equating it with racism. Now that’s divisive!

The reason I bring this up is because it shows what happens when the left is totally in control. An act of kindness by a young boy for the police gets twisted by woke progressives who just can’t tolerate it. 

By the way, Montgomery County is a sanctuary county where at least nine illegal immigrants, who should have been deported, have been arrested on charges of rape and sexual assault.

In New York City, also dominated by the left, there was a mini riot this weekend that was triggered in part by police officers enforcing subway fares. Fare evasions and crime are so prevalent that city officials recently announced the deployment of an additional 500 officers. 

The city is losing hundreds of millions of dollars because some people think they have a right to ride the subway for free. Evidently, Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez agrees with them. 

Everyone knows what a failure San Francisco is when it comes to homelessness and illegal immigration. Well, Austin, Texas, has swung hard left in recent years. So, where does the mayor of Austin go to get advice on homelessness? California!

Guess what? Austin now has a huge problem with homelessness. Gov. Greg Abbott is stepping in and sending state officials to clear out Austin’s homeless encampments.

Speaking of California, many in the Golden State are seriously reconsidering an effort to relax enforcement of minor property crimes. The liberal experiment, backed by the ACLU and other progressive groups, had predictable results: Shoplifting, vandalism, and other property crimes have skyrocketed in recent years.

My friends, we don’t have to guess at what the country will be like if the left takes back the White House and the Senate next year. From Montgomery County, Maryland, to Austin, Texas, from New York to San Francisco, there are plenty of case studies warning us against the left’s agenda. 

Pray for Persecuted Church

Sunday, Christians around the world came together in spirit for the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church. This annual event is observed every year on the first Sunday of November. The sad reality is that nearly 250 million Christians around the world face high levels of persecution simply for their faith. 

As you know, President Trump appointed me to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. The commission monitors religious persecution against any group anywhere in the world. But let me be clear: The evidence is overwhelming that no group suffers more persecution that Christians. 

From China to Nigeria, Syria to North Korea, Christians suffer unbelievable pain and penalties. All too often it is ignored by international organizations and the news media.

The Pew Research Center reports that Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the entire world. According to Open Doors just in the past year alone:

  • More than 4,300 Christians were killed for their faith.

  • More than 1,800 churches were attacked.

  • More 3,100 Christians were imprisoned for following Jesus.

As men and women of faith, we are not powerless. Please pray that God would comfort those who are suffering. Pray that Christians facing persecution would remain strong in their faith. Pray that their witness would inspire others.

If your church did not recognize the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church, please urge your pastor to address this urgent issue from the pulpit soon, and to mark it on the calendar for next year.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66571?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Fri/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
A Partisan Abuse of Power
dvOPTx6FBZJ67bh-cv0xCXdZ0hP7kYrH_e-CFE_pCvdd-iBJOGOJmEH9omAZ4RkdtSLmbOeVKUD_XnrXENtMUjoxkLOLACrqe1CtLsb3X8Sn2g0bSRTvWu5BPlUPC6GrNp3q8lvwUI5upHyqPEGMRx7wl3t2dQGMYEo95H0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Gary Bauer  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Friday Top News Executive Summary
3K-tdOJvZ10SjvMv9NKZFXqaNR3EoTroR7LkZ1Nu_CHNYQEZ7UEVx91agYH8MO0hNFPaTBPkI5KH8WF0eD_POoh7SvM15kzZGQCDuhUcTdtSxY4zigqZEd3xmRqTu0ORwjGtZc4ZMtXUwFMi14cR940nZItNCxLcQU7WLo0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


SOME WHISTLEBLOWERS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS: CBS fires former ABC staffer involved in leak of Amy Robach video (National Review)

PERJURY? scumbag/liar-nObama’s Ukraine ambassador allegedly lied under oath in impeachment inquiry, congressman suggests (The Daily Wire)

2020 Vision


CHASING AFTER OLD SEAT: Fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions announces run for Senate — while affirming Trump (Fox News)

WEAK FIELD: Mike Bloomberg is preparing to enter the Democrat presidential primary (CNBC)

Government & Politics


DELVING DEEPER: Republican senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson call on the State Department to release documents pertaining to Hunter Biden and Burisma (National Review)

WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG? commie-Bernie Sanders proposes to “break up” ICE and halt deportations in immigration plan (The Washington Times)

TRUMP FOUNDATION SETTLEMENT: Judge orders Trump to pay $2 million for misusing his foundation for political leverage (NBC News)

ON SECOND THOUGHT… Stocks fall after Trump says U.S. has not agreed to roll back China tariffs (CNBC)

Other Notables


INTERESTING TIMING: Chicago top cop Eddie Johnson retiring amid internal investigation — and just shortly after Trump chastised him (Fox News)

GLOBAL LYING: “11,000 scientists” climate emergency petition includes a bunch of fake names (Watts Up With That?)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: Why drug legalization and hugs for terrorists won’t solve the border crisis (The Federalist)

POLICY: Hold the shame — red meat is not bad for you or climate change (USA Today)

HUMOR: Whistleblower revealed to be recently hired White House janitor Hillarita Clintonez (The Babylon Bee)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/66681?mailing_id=4642&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4642&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
Is Pending IG Report on FISA Abuse Being 
Held-Up To Facilitate NSA Bulk Data 
Re-authorization That Expires December 15th?
CvxYJtDtDYjckVA0M0v0OZbgJceXqfNkJDQOdOK4D5cCCxeC6nIFjXZ4NQo2kSnDs5srrxkKhCLeK-nVMSY3KewbCRViStZOvA5R6CrLC5f3y6RE0uLUOSR58dv7lLFXJJsPMmEcB7OMN6i7UYY74mNDnjY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ With impeachment headlines absorbing most attention, there is a quiet background story happening in DC where re-authorization of the USA Freedom Act is needed prior to expiration on December 15th... Techno Fog points out the bulk NSA data collection and FISA(702) surveillance programs are part of this reauthorization. Just yesterday, November 6th, the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on the reauthorization. “Senators expressed their displeasure Wednesday with the Trump administration’s inability to answer questions about the National Security Agency’s collection of data records”. Which begs the question: Is the current Inspector General report on FISA abuse being delayed due to the need for congress to reauthorize the very same programs the IG is about to criticize? For context to this question, and considering the potential for some surprising revelations within the IG report on FISA, it is worth noting the Office of the Director of National Intelligence held back the the findings of FISA Judge James Boasberg that strongly criticized the FISA-702 process for a year. The Judge Boasberg report was written in September of 2018 but not released redacted until last month. There is a serious problem here…  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/07/is-pending-ig-report-on-fisa-abuse-being-held-up-to-facilitate-nsa-bulk-data-re-authorization-that-expires-december-15th/   
House Intelligence Committee Member Calls
For scumbag-Schiff To Answer
Questions Under Oath
v3KbTtEDS-vQ1IPkSNXsoNSW6nlrsxTBeqcsz1x9FN1JI4nf8rAENKy2kNkcwxfMkd7q1xnnc4yNme4u3hX5p5bX60FBmnw2KTS7Qe0_m8Duw-unQATeYBoKx3bC_dOpeJlj8isBrJRrRyz2zALprG3J7TvAhnmsY4sHM8xbMNC8oTS-wjNerwlxfZwn=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By  Molly Prince
{ dailywire.com } ~ Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) demanded on Tuesday that House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff (D-CA) testify under oath about his relationship with the whistleblower... who ignited impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.  “The whistleblower should answer questions under oath. But more importantly, scumbag-Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik told Fox News host Steve Doocy during an appearance on “Fox & Friends.” “I was the first member of Congress to ask when did scumbag-Adam Schiff have access to the whistleblower.” “We know now that that was before the whistleblower submitted his complaint to the inspector general,” she continued. “So there are a lot of serious questions about the coordination between the whistleblower and Chairman scumbag-Schiff.” House Democrats announced in September that they would be moving forward with an impeachment inquiry after a whistleblower’s testimony accused Trump of asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Democratic presidential candidate loose lips liar-Joe Biden for using his position as vice president to remove a Ukrainian prosecutor who was looking into his son’s business dealings...   https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-house-intelligence-committee-member-calls-for-schiff-to-answer-questions-under-oath?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro 
scumbag/liar-nObama’s Ukraine Ambassador Allegedly Lied Under Oath In Impeachment 
Inquiry, Congressman Suggests
KHnhE6qpQWpM_OVKEJySVzw4VKyYpaRW-TMMI3rH_a0Zg57sG7OwymQPwM9wZFDob916dF0TLSjvoo7MBLckjbannL-xGaAqQdhRifrzIIJfrhkf6LSQy_SxDxsWNNyerVW6f3d8Qt8SBZUF0CTBvtFLVCnh8IaCNawPDy22UnbQEgxOmLLtbo_D0wKw-JVjEg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By  Ryan Saavedra
{ dailywire.com } ~ Marie Yovanovitch, who was appointed to be the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine by former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama, allegedly made false statements under oath... during her October 11 closed-door testimony in House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.  “Before the contents of the whistleblower complaint were known publicly, a Democratic congressional staffer contacted the former American ambassador to Ukraine to discuss what the staffer described as ‘quite delicate and time sensitive questions,'” Fox News’ Tucker Carlson exclusively reported. “This show has obtained exclusively an email for that Democratic staffer for the House Foreign Affairs Committee sent by private email to the former American ambassador Marie Yovanovitch,” Carlson continued. “Yovanovitch, you know, is a key player in the Democrats’ impeachment probe and was recalled from her post in Ukraine by President Trump in May 2019 following allegations of serious partisanship and political bias.” The email Carlson obtained states: I’m writing to see if you would have time to meet up for a chat — in particular, I’m hoping to discuss some Ukraine-related oversight questions we are exploring. I’d appreciate the change to ground-truth a few pieces of information with you, some of which are quite delicate/time-sensitive and, thus, we want to make sure we get them right. “That email was sent on August 14, that was two days after the whistleblower complaint was filed and a month before that complaint became public,” Carlson stated. “The whistleblower, however, went to scumbag-Adam Schiff’s team before filing the complaint.” “The question is, did scumbag-Schiff’s office tell other Democrats on Capitol Hill what was in the complaint?” Carlson continued. “In other words, how long did this effort play out in secret before the rest of the country learned of it?” Carlson noted that Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) asked Marie Yovanovitch about the email during her testimony and she allegedly stated that she never responded to the email. “In fact, it turns out that she did respond,” Carlson revealed. “She said she ‘looked forward to chatting with the Democratic staffer.”...   https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-obamas-ukraine-ambassador-allegedly-lied-under-oath-in-impeachment-inquiry-congressman-suggests   
JW White Paper Makes Case to Designate
Mexican Cartels as Foreign
Terrorist Organizations  
chOX4BgVrTNBLxQ8qlgIwwoRWHVhfa04_Czi4QGsqgbSUHKxXfDaRlUA-aeEqZOtNNGCOFkLcenbvaZpJfHfiKO-UU68o7YCyzL8mFlOUUAVvgK2qorEsknITELEDwk4R-a-fQVq528fDDS9Q4Oy-_xd_QNjkL8AdjTTTLc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by judicialwatch.org ~ As the Trump administration considers designating Mexican drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO), Judicial Watch provides comprehensive documentation... that the sophisticated criminal operations meet the U.S. government’s requirements to make the list. In a White Paper released this week Judicial Watch outlines the unique challenges and national security risks posed by Mexican Transitional Criminal Organizations (TCO) and human trafficking. The threats require policy changes that include classifying Mexican TCOs as FTOs and a reassessment of Mexico under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), which requires countries to implement measures that address human trafficking in order to receive American aid. Mexico does not meet the minimum standards in several key areas, according to State Department documents obtained by Judicial Watch for the White Paper. Undoubtedly, Mexican drug cartels meet the U.S. government’s criteria for FTO designation, which requires organizations to be foreign, engage in terrorism or terrorist activity or possess the capability and intent to do so and pose a threat to U.S. nationals or U.S. national security. Mexican drug cartels are inherently foreign, routinely commit criminal acts within the statutory definition of terrorism and arguably represent a more immediate and ongoing threat to U.S. national security than any of the currently-designated FTOs on the State Department list. Properly designating the major Mexican TCOs—including Los Zetas, Juárez and Sinaloa cartels—as FTOs would enhance the federal government’s ability to combat that threat. An official FTO designation would enable the prosecution of those who provide material support to them, facilitate the denial of entry and deportation of TCO members and affiliates and eliminate the organizations’ access to the U.S. financial system. “FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business,” according to the State Department. For years Mexican cartels have hijacked and sabotaged buses, commercial trucks and trains, activity constituting terrorist activity under U.S. law. The White Paper lists specific cases, including gasoline tankers and more than a dozen robberies daily of Ferromex trains, one of the three largest rail transport operators in the country. Mexican TCOs have also committed hundreds of political assassinations in recent years and members of Los Zetas launched a grenade and shot small arms fire at the U.S. Consulate in Monterrey. Los Zetas members also murdered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agent Jaime Zapata a few years ago. Judicial Watch’s White Paper also documents Mexican cartels’ use of explosive devices and high-caliber firearms, including rocket-propelled grenades and other military weapons. In 2018 Mexican officials seized nearly 2,000 high-caliber weapons from suspected cartel associates in Mexico City and there have been approximately 150,000 organized-crime related murders in Mexico since 2006. Last year alone, there were nearly 1,200 kidnappings in Mexico, according to official figures provided in the White Paper...  https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/jw-white-paper-makes-case-to-designate-mexican-cartels-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations/  
.
Impeachment in The Courts – HJC vs DOJ 
Appellate Arguments Scheduled
for November 12th
sosRMUpcXIeWqUlOQXRjx_DnV9LsdwhokmnZA3XsmgzP4vhhmYhcs0u5u_IHwaxeyVchupU8a6qoGp2_jGUf27D_oHX8riQ8u9L_djz9QjkIPRhCtpho8k31xwzLwcsN5NGOBFi_y1yqwYSiAvpe_Jd5Q7JxmbtiUwCqibw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ There is an important granular aspect to the validity of the House impeachment process that few are paying attention to. If the HJC loses this case in the DC Appellate Court... it means there is no constitutional foundation recognized to the “impeachment inquiry.” Without the constitutional recognition of the judicial branch then: (a) liar-Pelosi/Lawfare have to restart the process with a genuine House vote; or (b) the ongoing impeachment process will have no recognized constitutional standing; and (c) the Senate could ignore any House impeachment vote, cast without recognized constitutional standing. On October 25th DC Judge Beryl Howell granted the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) request for legal authority to receive 6e grand jury material underlying the Mueller report. Additionally, and most importantly, within the Howell decision she officially recognized the HJC effort was predicated on a constitutional impeachment process. In essence Howell’s opinion granted the HJC with “judicial enforcement authority.” The DOJ moved to appeal the decision and requested a “stay” pending appeal.  Judge Howell rejected the DOJ “stay” motion. The DOJ then appealed to the DC Court of Appeals. A panel of three judges issued an “administrative stay”, blocking enforcement of the Howell ruling while the appeal was reviewed. The DC Appellate Court has now scheduled the arguments within the appeal...
.
FBI admits to altering Flynn’s 
interview notes after all
D69k6vX-804Crf-BRlcBvpqPLKYA4YGWLMTvevkbKin-npz0sJATMcSFhpzJxSsDNXrRdBOl3m8a1-tb_4ePQrYOWRI5Wg3Uk68U_jffr_xRSFCvCnPuhuGgdUg5eZAXNgTLMwCk8IKSvs9XBRkPJOaKiZ5PdiJcY4yPwg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By M. Dowling
{ independentsentinel.com } ~ Mueller’s probe was over for months, General Flynn had not been sentenced, and then along came Sidney Powell who took the case on... She demanded the documentation used to convict the General — all of it. The entire case rests on the FBI agents’interview notes in which they said he didn’t lie and then said they did. There were changes to the notes and she wants them. They denied there were alterations to the notes but now realize there were. The government now admits there were “alterations” made to Flynn’s interview notes. They switched the names on two sets of notes, one by Peter Strzok and the other by agent Joe Pientka. It’s just an “error” and they’re “sorry” for the “confusion.” The FBI agents interviewed entrapped Flynn in early January 2017 about his conversations with a Russian ambassador. Those conversations, by the way, were legal. “We were informed that the notes we had identified as Peter Strzok’s, were actually the other agent’s notes…and what we had identified as the other agent’s notes were, in fact, Strzok’s notes,” said U.S. Attorney Jessie K Liu said in a statement. “We understand this has caused some confusion and we regret our error.” She’s right! There’s “some confusion.” What does this mean in terms of alterations, exactly? Did Strzok change Pientka’s notes? As a result of this admission, Flynn’s attorney, Sidney Powell, wants the FBI to find all of the interview notes and determine what changes were made and by whom. “The entire case against Mr. Flynn depends on what the agents said that he said in the interview that they didn’t warn him about” or take “any verbatim recordings,” Powell told Fox News Tuesday. “So, their entire case depends on what these two agents said,” she added. “Now, 18 months later, they’re realizing that they got the names of the two agents crossed?...  https://www.independentsentinel.com/fbi-admits-to-altering-flynns-interview-notes-after-all/  
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
A Partisan Abuse of Power
dvOPTx6FBZJ67bh-cv0xCXdZ0hP7kYrH_e-CFE_pCvdd-iBJOGOJmEH9omAZ4RkdtSLmbOeVKUD_XnrXENtMUjoxkLOLACrqe1CtLsb3X8Sn2g0bSRTvWu5BPlUPC6GrNp3q8lvwUI5upHyqPEGMRx7wl3t2dQGMYEo95H0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Gary Bauer:  Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz is a self-identified liberal Democrat. He voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. He defended scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton against impeachment in 1998. And he’s adamantly opposed to what Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats are doing today in their attempt to impeach President Trump.

In his latest opinion piece, Dershowitz warns that the current impeachment effort is a raw partisan power grab, exactly what our founders like Alexander Hamilton feared most. Consider this excerpt:

Hamilton warned of the “greatest danger” that the decision to move forward with impeachment will “be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties than the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.”

Meanwhile, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy suggests that opponents of impeachment need to move beyond process arguments and start making the case for why Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president is not an impeachable offense. President Trump did nothing wrong.

As we have repeatedly noted, there is significant evidence of foreign involvement in the 2016 election, including between elements of our Deep State and the security agencies of other countries. That’s what U.S. Attorney John Durham is investigating.

We know that elements of the Ukrainian government played a major role in all of this. We know that former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden was assigned responsibility for managing Ukrainian foreign policy. We know there are issues of corruption involving his son. We know loose lips liar-Biden had his own quid pro quo with Ukraine, demanding the firing of a top prosecutor.

The left-wing media desperately doesn’t want any of this to get traction.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66578?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Friday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Time to Break Up With Turkey
J8uiUM5HyVD1yp-W1aFG_1BjAFoIk1X1ORfNezgXYqhAUFjDJnD2IFS1EcfQd_7KiJ2xmRhXaDwLxx0hLqfunLPv782-KyAyxFY23KBuaFW24TU3maWHvRJ0lUjW8XAmjr4LN0p5G1Igt03PWyXrN1wGsfdFkK0TQL8TtXs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchison  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was 
cited in key passage of Mueller report
dvvQt9K7TRSSrm7Pw9upSiocjEFugjwsj27hdAMgALGB1Gy9qIlaklapTol0E4ffgOlSUzBMVsRZnB1AzeQahX8CCQpgYMkc7hO9QGLzooPBf5tOBeocs6vf-QfRI2B9hfaVAUUMuYawjoVJqSinWp94M32ADMMueRNYE-UNkU79FrJLKkSPBhrS7rXhLWWelvJndAqM7i5Zje47oAEQjkN1jQhwDwozPv-Z2cGvY7nDyylU07vJlukW74jix_vZFBhk5iky824tqWuKr0i1Rkpwwl08mtH6-ZMpMl9o1VH1b_Ysi08a1hyCtcXMs0mLrvLsuE4Gfyu18k5rk3R-lkwPU1o7lBY2I4BkhMUvhYElvNw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jerry Dunleavy
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Eric Ciaramella, alleged to be the Ukraine whistleblower, was cited in a key passage of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report in connection to the meeting between President Trump and Russian officials... in the Oval Office the day after scumbag-James Comey was fired as FBI director. Ciaramella, a career CIA analyst, was Ukraine director on the National Security Council during the end of the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and remained there during the early months of the Trump administration, when he was briefly acting senior director for European and Russian affairs before the arrival of Fiona Hill. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella, 33, is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence. On Oct. 31, RealClearInvestigations reported that Ciaramella was the whistleblower who filed a complaint about a July 25 phone call. During the call, Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into a conspiracy theory regarding CrowdStrike and to investigate Democratic 2020 candidate loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son Hunter's business dealings in Ukraine. Ciaramella appears in a footnote on the 71st page of Mueller’s 448-page report, with Mueller citing two emails that he sent to John Kelly, then chief of staff, and other administration officials describing the details of a meeting between Trump and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. A letter that then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein wrote in May 2017 justified scumbag-Comey's firing by criticizing his handling of the scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton email investigation, but Trump would subsequently suggest he'd fired scumbag-Comey because of the Trump-Russia investigation. After scumbag-Comey was fired, he leaked information from some of his memos to the media in order to prompt the appointment of a special counsel. The Mueller report footnote referenced Ciaramella’s emails when it stated that “the meeting had been planned on May 2, 2017, during a telephone call between the President and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the meeting date was confirmed on May 5, 2017, the same day the President dictated ideas for the scumbag-Comey termination letter to Trump aide Stephen Miller.”...
.
Pentagon: Revenue From Syria 
Oil Fields to go to SDF Not United States
FsWWXleHrZ4yiOclLhxK4abIHOpP3oSci-iLCgGGNlQ2UfeIHd5yBbRGefog_zxs1qgce0QGn-v4GOFXAakxfKp4Zh6FGo2dMpnBXZPhQib7HFWZQ-sWVLCizQX4y830JqNydPEbV7GEpb-TiL7P=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by jpost.com ~ The Pentagon said on Thursday that revenue from oilfields in northeastern Syria will go to U.S.-backed forces rather than the United States itself... "The revenue from this is not going to the U.S., this is going to the SDF," Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman told reporters. The SDF stands for the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces. During a news conference announcing the death of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in a U.S. raid last month, President Donald Trump had raised the possibility of American oil companies taking over the oilfields in northeastern Syria, currently operated by the SDF. Amid concerns that Islamic State could stage a resurgence in the ensuing power vacuum, Trump said a small number of U.S. troops would remain in the area of Syria "where they have the oil," a reference to oilfields in the Kurdish-controlled region. However, the total number of U.S. forces is expected to number in the hundreds and potentially only slightly less than the roughly 1,000 that were in northern Syria when Trump made his surprise withdrawal announcement last month. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday the United States was not fulfilling its pledge to remove a Kurdish militia from a Syrian border region and said he will raise the issue when he meets Trump next week. During the briefing, Hoffman said he was not aware of SDF fighters in the area, but said the United States did not have complete visibility. Hoffman added that the United States expects Turkey to hold to account any Ankara-backed forces who allegedly commit war crimes in northeastern Syria. In the same briefing, the Pentagon said the ceasefire in northeastern Syria was generally holding.   https://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Pentagon-Revenue-from-Syria-oil-fields-to-go-to-SDF-not-United-States-607189   
Tucson Voters Overwhelmingly 
Reject Sanctuary City Proposal
P0oUEspxlWNHo0xVidi1AFH6WyOs_uxZKW70NdPuCKJ7AnaWqTeMgLlezmuBcoATzYj4E-d7AWd67BTFxlBOYSCuIFywaq7N7Gha5ne2Dgu15ctPoRYwqzf-r4ujjUHgcAYVVg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jason Hopkins
{ dailysignal.com } ~ In a major defeat for illegal alien advocates, voters in Tucson, Arizona, overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to designate it as the state’s one and only “sanctuary city.”... Tucson voters on Tuesday resoundingly opposed an initiative, known as Proposition 205, that would have given sweeping protections to illegal aliens and prohibited local law enforcement from working with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. At the close of the polls, over 71% of voters rejected the measure. Notably, the measure was opposed by every member of the Tucson City Council—all of whom are Democrats. The council members were concerned that its passage would lead to the loss of millions of dollars in federal and state funding. Leaders were very aware of the Trump administration’s fight against other local jurisdictions that have passed sanctuary policies, threatening to withhold federal grants as punishment. Council members were also concerned that the measure would prohibit the city from working with federal law enforcement on issues that have no relation to immigration enforcement. “It’s refreshing to see Tucson voters and council members work collectively to reject policies that undermine federal law and harbor criminal illegal aliens,” Matthew Tragesser, spokesperson at the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said in a Wednesday statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation. “While there are more than 560 sanctuary jurisdictions throughout the country, citizens nationwide are voicing their concerns and stymieing dangerous sanctuary laws. At the state level, Florida recently adopted anti-sanctuary laws. At the local level, Montgomery County, Maryland, has experienced a spate of violent crimes at the hands of illegal aliens, and also just incorporated anti-sanctuary policies,” Tragesser continued...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/11/07/tucson-voters-overwhelmingly-reject-sanctuary-city-proposal/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=tucson-voters-overwhelmingly-reject-sanctuary-city-proposal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWTJabE5XTTRaV0prTkRZeCIsInQiOiJ0WVRSTHhubFlwNXhzZzMwZEN2aDRpWTRBTGpxSDg2VzBPRXV6bEN5V3d4NUVMYWNTUlBLWjZvZzhlWCtCbk4wU2pWYlB0KzZVYVBBd1pCekpNc0V3dFwvQkNjWlZ1SEhSWXYyek9HUktLQ09tNU5HODdoVW5oTXE5TzFVR2c4b0oifQ%3D%3D   
.
US warns Iran could be 
positioning for ‘rapid nuclear breakout’
C-QOTrpnHGWtJS7UkZT-jHTTupxmHjj0lHurYey50CfMGiyenn0kg8Zs5UORZCoebWYLs1a3Em8GsRxl9PgrfWzemAmIyTXpmsQwTm5o6f13uqLxgkqNLjMHEJ26BhDrlMs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ The United States on Thursday called for “serious steps” to be taken after Iran resumed uranium enrichment at its underground Fordo plant... in a new step back from its commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal. “Iran’s expansion of proliferation-sensitive activities raises concerns that Iran is positioning itself to have the option of a rapid nuclear breakout,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement. “It is now time for all nations to reject this regime’s nuclear extortion and take serious steps to increase pressure.” Iran resumed uranium enrichment at its underground Fordo plant south of Tehran on Thursday in a new step back from its commitments under a landmark 2015 nuclear deal. Engineers began feeding uranium hexafluoride gas into the plant’s mothballed enrichment centrifuges in “the first minutes of Thursday,” the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization said. The suspension of uranium enrichment at the long secret plant was one of the restrictions Iran had agreed to on its nuclear program in return for the lifting of UN sanctions. Iran’s announcement that it would resume enrichment at the Fordo plant from midnight 2030 GMT Wednesday had drawn a chorus of concern from the remaining parties to the troubled agreement. The EU said Thursday it was “deeply concerned” by an incident involving an inspector with the UN’s nuclear watchdog last week in Iran which led to her having her accreditation canceled...
.
GOP raises alleged whistleblower name 
in secret hearing, and Dems post it online
HppfVQE7AlHRXasDZWJrS2t2MhTlYwG9stnDwIzfkqumZPeDPmJgWuwLjER-5kADKFLUVOaduh6zknm5WDUQPn0lRaPh-UqduwgllXA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by wnd.com ~ Lawyers for the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint triggered the impeachment inquiry against President Trump... have warned of consequences if the accuser's name is revealed. But the Democratic majority itself may have outed the whistleblower when it  posted online a transcript of the testimony of William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine. Taylor, according to page 236 of the transcript, was asked by the committee's Republican counsel, Steve Castor: "Okay. Does a person by the name of Eric Ciaramella ring a bell for you? Taylor replied that it didn't, and he affirmed he never had any communications with somebody by that name. When WND asked Democrats in the majority on the House Oversight Committee to identify Ciaramella, the man answering the telephone suddenly went silent and said he was transferring the caller to the media team. However, no one on the media team was willing to respond, and the reporter asked to communicate via email, which also did not generate a response. Donald Trump Jr., defying warnings by the whistleblower's lawyers, sent out a tweet Wednesday identifying Ciaramella as the whistleblower. Last Thursday, attorneys for the whistleblower, Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, declined to confirm or deny that their client was Ciaramella. The day before,  RealClearInvestigations reported Ciaramella, a CIA analyst, is the whistleblower, calling his identity "an open secret inside the Beltway." Trump Jr.'s tweet linked to a Breitbart News report that Ciaramella was part of an scumbag/liar-nObama administration email chain celebrating the eventual signing of a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee to Ukraine. According to the Washington Examiner: "Ciaramella, 33, a career CIA analyst, was Ukraine director on the National Security Council during the end of the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and remained there during the early months of the Trump administration, when he was briefly acting senior director for European and Russian affairs. On Oct. 7, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence." Bakaj and Zaid claim that identifying "any suspected name for the whistleblower will place their family at risk of serious harm."...
.
Democrats Must Really Hate Women
By Tom Trinko
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Have you noticed that the #MeToo movement is dead to Democrats these days?... Democrat representative Katie Hill had an affair with a staffer, a violation of the core concept of #MeToo that bosses can't have sexual relations with subordinates, and Democrats are bemoaning the fact that she had to resign. How can that be? That's because they never really believed in #MeToo, and they never cared about women. Democrat support for #MeToo was nothing more than a ploy to attack Trump and other Republicans. Trump is infamous for his philandering, though it seems to have ended about a decade ago, so the Democrats thought the #MeToo movement would be a good weapon to attack him with. They decided to sacrifice a pawn, Harvey Weinstein, a fading Hollywood mogul whose days of power were slipping into the past, to create a movement they thought could be used against Trump. The problem is that unlike with Weinstein, there's no credible evidence that Trump ever coerced women. Even the infamous tape reveals Trump saying women let a man grope them — i.e., Trump was talking about groupies, not women he forced to do anything. Now, that doesn't make Trump a paragon of virtue, but it's clear he's in a different league from people like Weinstein, who used their position of authority to coerce women into having sex with them. Democrats also sacrificed a less than totally popular Democrat senator, Al Franken, who probably won his office only due to voter fraud, not because they cared about women, but because it would allow them to attack Roy Moore, who had been accused of dating young girls. That ploy worked, since the Democrats won the election against Moore and Franken was replaced by a hardcore leftist because the governor of Minnesota was a Democrat. Unsurprisingly, now that Moore is history, some Democrats are trying to rehabilitate Franken.  We know that Democrats don't care about women because they all knew what Weinstein was up to for years, but they said nothing until Weinstein's power was waning and they saw a way to weaponize sexual harassment against Trump...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Time to Break Up With Turkey
J8uiUM5HyVD1yp-W1aFG_1BjAFoIk1X1ORfNezgXYqhAUFjDJnD2IFS1EcfQd_7KiJ2xmRhXaDwLxx0hLqfunLPv782-KyAyxFY23KBuaFW24TU3maWHvRJ0lUjW8XAmjr4LN0p5G1Igt03PWyXrN1wGsfdFkK0TQL8TtXs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchison:  When it comes to American policy in the Middle East, there is something that will clearly have to be done, even though it will be quite painful. To quote noted foreign-policy expert Taylor Swift, the United States needs to tell the regime of Recep Tayyip Erdogan, “We are never ever ever getting back together.”

Loyal Patriot Post readers will know that we have been discussing the misdeeds of Erdogan and his regime for a long time. The Erdogan regime is different from the likes of Iran only by virtue of the fact that it has not openly called for the elimination of Israel. That’s cold comfort.

The fact is, kicking Erdogan’s regime out of the F-35 program was the right call, even if the purchase of the Russian-built S-400/SA-21 air-defense system was the wrong reason. America’s most advanced multirole fighter did not need to fall into the hands of a regime that is trending against American values, not to mention showing hostility toward America’s best ally in the Middle East — Israel.

The recent Turkish attack on the Kurds, despite the blunt warning President Donald Trump gave Erdogan, is just another sign that the Erdogan regime and America are just on separate, irreconcilable paths. While the withdrawal decision was controversial, there is one benefit — it gave Erdogan enough rope to hang himself in terms of his reputation and standing amongst the American people.

The fact is, Erdogan is taking Turkey back in time — and it now should be obvious that the failure of the 2016 coup is coming back to bite America. Erdogan has doubled down on taking the full Islamist path, he is willing to go after the Kurds, and he is a friend of Hamas — an organization designated as a terrorist group. These are deal-breakers, especially in our post-9/11 world.

Meanwhile, we have nuclear weapons deployed in Turkey that would need to be moved. But 50 B61 nuclear gravity bombs cannot be just flown to anywhere. The issue is not just the physical security of the nukes. Their deployment also is a statement of national commitment. We could move them to Eastern Europe — say, Romania — but that would unnerve the Russians. Not a bad option in the course of things, but given the situation in the Middle East, there is a much better option — and one that can send a message to our ex-ally in Ankara.

The nukes — and the American aircraft based at Incirlik Air Base — should be moved to Israel.

This does several things. First of all, it sends a strong message to the world that the United States will stand by Israel. While Israel is reported to have its own nukes, to have American nuclear weapons in Israel would be a major deterrent to Iran.

Second, it would still maintain America’s position in the Middle East — in fact, it would improve it. American and Israeli military personnel would be able to train together, and the Israelis have a great deal of expertise in electronic warfare — something that could help America in a potential conflict with Russia. American forces would still be able to handle ISIS in Syria while launching from Israel, and the Israelis are much more reliable allies. Israel is a redoubt of democracy and respect for human rights, and American policy should support it.

Third, given the harsh realities of the War on Terror and  the lessons that have come from 18 years of fighting jihadis, moving American forces to Israel would also bolster the chances for long-term peace in the region by deterring aggression, mostly by making starting a war with Israel (or America) look futile to any Middle East miscreant.

Finally, moving American forces will deprive Erdogan of potential hostages that he can use to affect American foreign policy. This is not a small consideration. The safety of our troops will be a major concern as America breaks up with Erdogan. As hard as it would be, this breakup is rapidly becoming necessary.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66570?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thursday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Military Readiness Isn't What It Should Be
J_nkZUJq7xFQ-_VnDforMnnR3mJRUKLgBU-d6mylC_6o8Vv-ZujThjRlqKiG9dbGxnnmToSBUC12F973uoUjfNNMD4RKVL8uz92pWaV-RsSdItYgSZOW52lCM9DVInw_mHKhuEj2hia_5fYtU17uBjZbpIzh6VBPHlH7HhM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
John J. Bastiat  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Mind-Blowing! Flynn Prosecutor Now Claims Authorship Of Interview Notes ‘Misidentified’
NdsJEMkK6UzqGVxQGunCImKrSG8AUbspbO3FMLBIkgbM1EikHAuZKHeJlfdOoveTXkHdmHB3QMPXprIp1mUueH18CMl1DPLuTEH9_O_Z_E2ZqHA9Rg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by J.E. Dyer
{ lidblog.com } ~ The DOJ attorneys prosecuting Michael Flynn sent a letter to Flynn’s attorney that the Flynn interview notes were ‘misidentified’ as being written by Peter Strzok... The only serious response to this utterly bizarre disclosure is, “I can’t even.” Most readers are familiar with the basic facts of the Michael Flynn case. The salient facts in this instance relate to the interview done with him by FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka on 24 January 2017. That interview became the basis for the single count of giving a false statement to which Flynn eventually pleaded in December 2017. There has been widespread, justifiable criticism of the apparent methods and motives of the FBI in handling this interview. It’s evident in hindsight that what the agents did was ambush Flynn, under the pretext of discussing counterintelligence security with him, and ask him a lot of questions to which the two agents already had institutional answers. They had background investigations and monitored phone calls to rely on; their evident purpose was not to obtain information from Flynn but to lay a perjury trap for him by tripping him up on the details of previous events his memory might have been faulty on. Their record of the interview indicated afterward that they saw no sign of deceptive intent in Flynn’s responses.  But differences between his recollections in the interview and the information Strzok and Pientka already had from other sources became the basis for holding a perjury charge over Flynn, and eventually threatening to bankrupt his son with a wire brush “investigation” as well. The Flynn saga has been a long and tortuous one no doubt torturous as well, for the Flynns; the purpose is not to rehash the entire thing here. So fast-forward to Flynn switching counsel in June 2019: letting Covington Burling go and hiring Sidney Powell as his attorney. It seems Flynn and his counsel must unquestionably be given every single scrap of memorial material from the 24 January 2017 interview.  On the other hand, if I were Judge Emmett Sullivan, I’d be looking seriously at throwing this case out, and reprimanding the prosecution severely for putting the defendant, the court, and the taxpayers through this utter travesty of a proceeding.  Looking into prosecutorial misconduct wouldn’t seem to be out of line...  https://lidblog.com/flynn-interview-notes/   
Gregg Jarrett Unravels the Coordinated, Premeditated Plot to Impeach Trump
8cTXoOqATMOXh6IoRcrFiclrlv1C9kmf2cT1m-Y5n83L5TozY8sIoieRTGfPch-0CzsG6_cpoJeMDk0d6sznzse2NsrwsoPs3pRMbNEbzgkLAnubdOYuNOuh7wrk417n3HtYFrtmVJCOwfASrq_SX_o2V3w_xG7PmvjutV-9AjEDe0C1lyYkPetsGj-Df1kjZ6zXEX0wyU2x8KQU7deXxAY86P29v1qJ57ciUw2wZF_Pl78ENT3-=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by thegreggjarrett.com ~ During his appearance on Fox and Friends, Gregg Jarrett discussed the revelations that the “whistleblower’s” attorney was tweeting about a coup against President Trump in January of 2017... “Whistleblower” attorney, Mark Zaid, also stated, “I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.” Gregg points out that this information, in addition to the fact that Zaid was the attorney who Rep. scumbag-Schiff’s committee recommended to the whistleblower, shows that this is a witch hunt to try to impeach President Trump. “All of the witnesses who will be called have already testified secretly. They are all opinion witnesses offering their interpretations of the conversation they weren’t privy to. They are all diplomats and diplomats are notorious gossipers. So, for example, Steve mentioned Bill Taylor is one of the first witnesses. Taylor said oh, it was my understanding there was a quid pro quo. Did you get that from the president? No. A guy told a guy who told a guy who told me. If that were in a court of law a judge would say to the jurors disregard the testimony, strike it from the record. It’s irrelevant.” With all of this new information, it is even more apparent that the “whistleblower” is not entitled to anonymity, and they are merely an informant acting as a Democrat operative.   https://thegreggjarrett.com/gregg-jarrett-unravels-coordinated-premeditated-plot-impeach-trump/ 
Pam Bondi, former Florida AG, 'likely' to 
join White House during impeachment
y9EW_YuxrKt-CXXFcMtitQQPb5KjYQUzJC48lpSDe9QJ3qC4HGdYbGnnmODrcbRVtFw7SjeQTCx5PPz1UOvLKlXxn5TDBnJqByervFT76g2R6WpSuzrUSwjnZhs7xbCYjubuhzY9nQ54QIH7ngNyFEvJBaM719fbDcn37Nf5lJqWrJpyAR5QPtCrTuHBibb9aE6Dyj1_zuy3aR8g6dUh6zGZWbJqle-wHTo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Dave Boyer 
{ washingtontimes.com } ~ Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said Thursday she will “most likely” join the White House communications team as President Trump gears up to fight impeachment... During an appearance on “Fox & Friends,” Ms. Bondi said she and former Treasury Department spokesman Tony Sayegh would be coming in to help with not only communications, “but with special projects and legal issues and just lots of stuff with the White House. They’re so crazy busy.” She said the president already has a “huge team” that she would be joining, including “wonderful” acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone. “Jared Kushner is one of the smartest human beings I’ve ever met,” Ms. Bondi said of the president’s adviser and son-in-law. “And the president, frankly, is his best spokesperson. This is just helping with a huge team and doing a lot of other special projects. So if it works out, I’m going to be thrilled.” White House senior counselor Kellyanne Conway said Thursday that Ms. Bondi and Mr. Sayegh are being hired as special temporary employees “to work specifically on all matters related to this ‘impeachment inquiry.’” Asked about Ms. Bondi’s lobbying work, Mrs. Conway replied, “She’s not here to lobby. She’s here to try to make sense of how in the world we’re going to impeach and remove a democratically elected president from office, based on somebody’s presumption of an interpretation of intuition of an implication of an assumption.” Ms. Bondi, a Republican, served as Florida’s top state prosecutor from 2011 until last January. She has been working as a lobbyist for several interests, including as a registered foreign agent for the government of Qatar..  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/7/pam-bondi-former-florida-ag-likely-join-white-hous/   
The Democrats’ Nomination 
is scumbag/liar-Hillary's to Lose
-jJNqTB_xtMb8oN_DzQ-e8U2rzKrRtIB1cPPr9mJfKjHtcOtLU96Ym3AVWMqYNOhkyReu1oGX8sebVAfSnT-d_Fg7oFrIeGb1cucABEAMuEXOSX9IzU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Bill Schanefelt
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Be afraid, be very afraid. Barring some serious event in her life, scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton likely will be nominated for President of the United States by the Democrat party in mid-July next year.... “Ridiculous,” you say. “Why, even Bill Maher and Doug Schoen are against her,” you continue. That is true, but it means nothing. As do all of the other disparaging stories in the MSM about her public appearances and the possibility of her entry into the race.. Before anyone sweeps the notion her becoming President under the rug, it is important to understand, in the first instance, that, of the current crop of contenders, only Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren has a chance of exiting the Democratic Convention in Miami next July 16th with the nomination in hand. Let's take a cursory look at the field now before we go into scumbag/liar-Hillary's entrance and eventual dominance of the race for the nomination. You may disagree with my opinions, but making the case for anybody else prevailing will be a challenging task for anyone. One more health- or age-related incident, and commie-Bernie is toast. He still has an army of supporters, but the health issue will eventually take its toll, especially as dinky/liar-Warren vigorously appears in multiple venues and rises in the polls:  ...commie-Sanders’ health poses a concern to Democrats....most seriously, given his Oct. 1 heart attack, leaned Democrats divide about evenly, 48-45%, on whether or not commie-Sanders, 78, is in good enough overall health to serve as president. That’s a stark contrast to both loose lips liar-Biden, age 76, seen as in good enough health by 74%, and dinky/liar-Warren, age 70, seen as healthy by 80%....But younger adults, who are among commie-Sanders’ strongest supporters, are most apt to think he’s in good enough health to serve – six in 10, 18- to 39-year-olds say so. Just 40% of those age 40 and older agree. loose lips liar-Biden's campaign is on life-support. In addition to the Ukraine problem, he's having trouble raising money and falling in the polls, he lies constantly, he loses track of what he's saying or where he is, he's often confused, he sometimes talks like he's still in office, and, frankly, he looks like hell! I'll be amazed if he's still in the race when the December debate rolls around. Pete Buttigieg is strong in the polls now and seems to have a good strategic plan, but being gay hurts him badly among  black, Hispanic, and rural voters. He will continue to put up a good fight, but he will soon top out as the caucuses and primaries unfold. Amy Klobuchar is feisty and may well get close to dinky/liar-Warren, but only if she can raise enough money...
.
Russia Became a Communist 
Hellhole Because of This Man
pViSitB0EdWti6WEi29ROl7rte837BdMOqqcLw683HUIEfkr2nnUozMHYfcQo9rIck9sDYB6egMy6JJJOfEqPjOtgcBK8s2NNWiZqhGOz1CXmKjvRQ0D1gyUN-4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Richard Lim
{ dailysignal.com } ~ To understand communism, it’s important to look at the man who was the first to institute a government dedicated to Karl Marx’s ideals: Vladimir Lenin.... When I was in college, I recall a conversation with several classmates who joked about throwing a get-together and naming it “The Communist Party.” They mocked the idea that anyone would fear this supposedly well-meaning ideology. I wonder if they would have been laughing if they were in the presence of gulag survivors. This Nov. 7 marks the 102nd anniversary of Lenin’s rise to power in Russia, and Nov. 9 will mark the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, the symbol of tyranny built by the regime he forged. Victor Sebestyen’s 2017 biography on Lenin—the first major biography of the Soviet leader to hit Western bookshelves in two decades—documents his many crimes against humanity. Lenin’s streak of cruelty began long before he came to power. By his early 20s, his zealous dedication to Marxism led him to believe that anything justified revolution. Cruelty Without a Conscience. When a famine broke out in the Volga region in 1891—one that would kill 400,000 people—Lenin welcomed the event, hoping that it would topple the Czarist regime. His sisters, dedicated revolutionaries themselves, assisted with relief efforts for the starving and were shocked by his callous refusal to help...   https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/11/06/russia-became-a-communist-hellhole-because-of-this-man/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=russia-became-a-communist-hellhole-because-of-this-man?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkRZNFlUVXlaR1JoTWpSaiIsInQiOiJhY0RPZ29MbWM1OXBaVUtYXC81OU1wdXVnTXp5a2pGQTlnMmNMc09CbDVwWTNSNTdUTmhlMVJ3c3FNRU1sa3IrRTNFdmtZRFF6czN3T1UxM2VOc1dBTVkrcWRHQTdRWDBBcis2RjlPN2lHbWNaSlI2REgxZW43U2dzNm5UaGdZd3MifQ%3D%3D   
California Woman Contracts Parasitic Worms
 in Her Eye After Going on a Trail Run
Y-ZJEiH2v7s_l1pQW7EK67k9-OqDGv62ana0pBWTZzHxhsqEsbmNyNUzG0ivq-Bl2B0dLL_RFNARF4Don2c0SKgp2DQfP841Wuo9MVOD6V-xdITKZElkJQmKm_rh1Y319Y0T3eqDkOFjhZpzxWIagCY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Julie Mazziotta
{ people.com } ~ A woman in California contracted parasitic worms in her eye after running through a swarm of flies during a trail run. The 68-year-old woman is only the second known person in the United States to contract the rare condition... which typically occurs in cows. The woman, who was not named, was featured in a case study in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. She first discovered the worms in March 2018, when her right eye started to bother her. The woman splashed tap water into her eye, and a “wriggly” .5-inch roundworm came out, LiveScience reported. She then found another roundworm, which she also pulled out. She went to an eye doctor the next day, who found a third roundworm and instructed her to continue washing out her eye with distilled water and also to apply a topical medication. The woman, who is from Nebraska but spends her winters in Northern California, then returned home to the Midwest but still felt something in her eye. Doctors there could not see anything, but she soon found a fourth roundworm and pulled it out herself. She believes that she developed the worms after going trail running in Carmel Valley, near Monterey, in February 2018. While on her run, she remembers going through a swarm of flies, and “swatting the flies from her face and spitting them out of her mouth,” according to the report. The woman’s doctor sent samples of the roundworm to the Centers for Disease Control, where researchers identified it as Thelazia gulosa, a rare species of eye worm. The only other reported case of Thelazia gulosa occurred in a 26-year-old woman in Oregon, who had 14 roundworms removed from her left eye in August 2016. These first cases occurring within a span of two years is concerning, the scientists wrote in the case study. The cases “suggest that this may represent an emerging zoonotic disease in the United States,” they said. Additionally, the roundworm sample was developing eggs, “indicating that humans are suitable hosts for the reproduction of T. gulosa.” Still, the risk of infection is extremely low...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Military Readiness Isn't What It Should Be
J_nkZUJq7xFQ-_VnDforMnnR3mJRUKLgBU-d6mylC_6o8Vv-ZujThjRlqKiG9dbGxnnmToSBUC12F973uoUjfNNMD4RKVL8uz92pWaV-RsSdItYgSZOW52lCM9DVInw_mHKhuEj2hia_5fYtU17uBjZbpIzh6VBPHlH7HhM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
John J. Bastiat:  The Heritage Foundation just completed its 2020 Index of U.S. Military Strength, a comprehensive annual assessment of U.S. defense capabilities, and as usual the news isn’t good. Based on its historical dedication to in-depth assessments of U.S. defense strength, Heritage credibly touts its Index as the only “non-governmental” (read: “not exceedingly biased”) annual assessment of U.S. military strength. This year’s summary: “As currently postured, the U.S. military is only marginally able to meet the demands of defending America’s vital national interests.”

Sadly, the only surprise related to this report would be if anyone were surprised at its conclusion. At base, of course, the report is merely a witness to nearly a decade’s worth of inattention and neglect during the scumbag/liar-nObama regime, a result only recently begun to be rectified.

The report begins by outlining the long-standing objectives related to the use of U.S. military force: “Over the past few decades, three vital interests have been specified consistently and in various ways by a string of Administrations: Defense of the homeland; successful conclusion of a major war that has the potential to destabilize a region of critical interest to the United States; and preservation of freedom of movement within the global commons (the sea, air, outer-space, and cyberspace domains) through which the world conducts its business.” The report then discusses the well-settled means recommended to achieve those objectives: “The many factors involved make determining how big the military should be a complex exercise, but successive Administrations, Congresses, and Department of Defense (DOD) staffs have managed to arrive at a surprisingly consistent force-sizing rationale: an ability to handle two major wars or major regional contingencies (MRCs) simultaneously or in closely overlapping time frames.”

The primary regions assessed are Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. The Index notes that while conditions in Europe are “favorable” — meaning an MRC is unlikely — those in the Middle East and Asia are not so sanguine. Specifically, while the likelihood of an MRC in the Middle East is “moderate,” general political stability in the region continues to be “unfavorable.” That’s putting it mildly. Asia, meanwhile, is “favorable … in terms of alliances, overall political stability, militarily relevant infrastructure, and the presence of U.S. military forces.” But this overall assessment, while sounding upbeat at first blush, is substantially offset by further characterizations of several Asian state actors. Indeed, the report flatly identifies Russia, China, North Korea and Iran as “aggressive” threats to vital U.S. security interests. Further the capability of each is assessed as “formidable” (the highest category) or nearly so, “gathering” (the second-highest capability, in the cases of Iran and North Korea).

To support these characterizations the Index points to Russia’s provocations in Ukraine and other Eastern-European nations, its active support of separatist forces in Ukraine, its regular performance of “provocative military exercises and training missions” and its aggressive sales and exports of arms to countries hostile to the U.S. The Index also cites Russia’s “sabotage [of] U.S. and Western policy in Syria and Ukraine” as well as its “investment in modernizing its military,” even as it continues to gain combat experience in both regions.

The report also singles out China as “the most comprehensive threat the U.S. faces,” categorizing its capability as “formidable” and its behavior as “aggressive.” China continues to modernize and grow its military capabilities even as the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) metastasizes well beyond China’s territorial waters and lands. The PLA’s provocative activities include numerous comprehensive military exercises near very tense borders, live-fire maneuvers near Taiwan, probes of South Korean and Japanese air defense identification zones, and countless episodes globally of Chinese cyber-combat, espionage, and computer-network exploitation.

Of course the usual suspects — Iran and North Korea — continue to also pose menaces to world peace, as do terrorist threats around the globe (notably in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). But with the “normalization of deviation” DOD has been forced to accept — that is, the resigned acceptance of a defense force incapable of fully addressing the span of security threats to the U.S. — these threats are simply acknowledged in the report for the clear and present dangers they are. That said, though none of these threats should be taken lightly, each should be taken in stride: Meeting the two-MRC requirement would also address the threat posed by any single regional conflict generated by one of these actors.

And how should this two-MRC challenge be met? Through a lengthy analysis, the Index practically translates “two-MRC capability” into a standing U.S. joint defense force of 50 Army brigade combat teams (BCTs), 400 Navy battle force ships with 624 strike/fleet-defense aircraft, 1,200 Air Force fighter/bomber/ground-attack aircraft and 36 Marine battalions. How does DOD currently stack up against this levy? Not so well.

Using the three metrics of “capability” (a force’s modernization level), “capacity” (the size of the force), and “readiness” (the force’s ability to mobilize and employ), each of the four war-fighting Services was assessed as “marginal.” U.S. nuclear capability — itself the umbrella under which a great deal of implied conventional U.S. military capability vests — was also assessed as “marginal.” Even this is a charitable assessment, given the fact the “bulk of the current nuclear arsenal was first developed in the 1980s” but — cynically speaking — at least it’s consistent with the rest of the picture.

Finally, the report acknowledges the practical reality faced by our defense forces, namely, “that unless a dramatic change in circumstances occurs, such as the onset of a major conflict, a multitude of competing interests that evolve during extended periods of peace and prosperity will lead Administrations and Congresses to deemphasize investing in defense and instead to favor domestic programs. Consequently, garnering sufficient support to increase defense spending for a two-war-capacity force is problematic.” Still, as the report ominously warns, “This political condition does not change the patterns of history, the behavior of competitors, or the reality of what it takes to defend America’s interests in an actual war.”

For our part, this year’s Index strikes us as spot-on, especially in its appraisal of the near-term, practical prospects of achieving the military strengths needed to meet the two-MRC requirement. Still, Step One, as the saying goes, is that “acceptance is the first step to recovery”: This problem will not be fixed until it is first identified and then acknowledged. Our good friends over at Heritage have consistently helped to raise the military-preparedness flag over the years, this year being no exception. Let’s hope that this administration, unlike the last — or virtually any Democrat administration since Truman — will acknowledge the immediacy of the problem and act accordingly, notwithstanding this current period of qualified peace and prosperity which, historically speaking, is likely to be relatively brief.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66579?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thursday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Dems Trickle Out Impeachment 
Testimony Transcripts
T5FqM5LSgUAz0Jb-oa1S-v1Reirgu2BCRswzptBQCQkECRkm5hkLKFiBA0GnSowkQKQH5f_i_INa367dNFYRyjVfVufJ0rQod9Si7RutktZobMTB5GXDw8ZHm119AO-zOUeabIwVKg2zxGyPBttQeDuBgMpAGSA8lA4j1bo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Testimony Transcript Shows William Taylor 
Never Talked To Trump, Wasn’t Even 
On July 25 Phone Call
bwlkuGz2S-R6dWGOlxZBKeSfYRxP2OoD_dw_JT54zu-5bAg7rViOeSmyzkLby-tvma4PgQuCT5SZv5BYkLqXyhBgB4z4AfSiOPsMreCp4OjIIdR9A-8AlalWCVABHef4Z71kCDic=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Sean Davis
{ thefederalist.com } ~ A key Democratic witness against Trump admitted in congressional testimony last month that he was not part of the July 25 phone call between the U.S. and Ukrainian presidents... that he didn’t see a transcript or readout of it until late September when it was declassified and released, and that he has never even spoken to President Donald Trump. William Taylor, the charge d’affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, told lawmakers in secret testimony two weeks ago that his opinions about an alleged quid pro quo demanded by Trump were formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy. “You’ve never spoken to Mr. Rudy Giuliani?” Taylor was asked. “No, no,” he replied. “Has anyone ever asked you to speak to Mr. Giuliani?” “No,” Taylor said. “And if I may, have you spoken to the president of the United States?” Taylor was asked. “I have not,” he said. “You had no communications with the president of the United States?” “Correct,” Taylor said. He also admitted he had never spoken to Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s chief of staff. When asked who exactly he had spoken to about the brouhaha, Taylor confirmed that his only contacts about the matter were with John Bolton, the former national security adviser who was fired by Trump, Fiona Hill, Alexander Vindman, and Tim Morrison. Both Hill and Vindman are rumored to have been sources for the so-called whistleblower who filed a complaint against Trump in August. Taylor also testified that his knowledge of the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymr Zelensky wasn’t first-hand knowledge...
.
Sondland Changes Testimony Over 
Trump Impeachment Inquiry
CfgnfIOcUy0l61NbgPJeuWBiA1t-bLJOHUb4J_G5CThCeqEQn0BOEh9kYa22yx9JCex6p6XvEY0fc5dTZNUTZU8AZnmfq1VtJcJiJ-v4VyWply3_z9VokKiNhpBXIcK2791w4XCcZpPLkVEYCu0CUOMGNzxWMYjUu6sYsZ-tqw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Deneen Borelli
{ deneenborelli } ~  News of recently released transcripts over President Trump’s impeachment inquiry is dominating the headlines... Democrats released the transcripts of testimony from former U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker and U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland, key players in the impeachment inquiry led by House Democrats. Volker testified President Trump did not withhold a meeting with Ukraine President Zelensky in return for an investigation into the 2016 election, saying, “no… there was no linkage.” Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) Tweeted about Volker’s testimony. President Trump commented about Volker’s testimony. Most of the news focused on Sondland’s revised testimony. Initially, Sondland said he was unaware President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani was urging Ukraine to investigate Ukrainian gas company Burisma where former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s son Hunter was serving on its board of directors. However, Sondland revised his testimony to reflect a “refreshed” view of events following his analysis of other testimony provided to Congress, saying he told a Ukraine official, “U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.” Sondland earlier testimony stated President Trump told him, “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing… to do what he ran on.” Sondland’s revised testimony is being used by Democrats to support their claim that President Trump engaged in a quid pro quo to get Ukraine to investigate loose lips liar-Biden, a political rival...   https://deneenborelli.com/2019/11/sondland-changes-testimony-over-trump-impeachment-inquiry/   
IDIOT: scumbag-Schiff Releases Transcript, FORGETS To Redact Alleged
Whistleblower’s Name
2029SyVvRi68GQaJnv6okxlxpcQgN4c3f7vUl758S6CLFuUO_JX1DEfDJ73ZdW9Gu2bjoWFAhlt77pN4Ly5P2OIWte2QcbjF3u7nGOtFCrOkJ_tq=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
#Whistleblower Identified As 33 Year Old #EricCiaramella   
by Martin Walsh
{ explainlife.com } ~ Democrats are so inept that every time they release new information to the public about their impeachment witch hunt into President Donald Trump — it further proves they have no case at all... There’s currently a major controversy brewing over whether or not to reveal the name of the so-called whistleblower who filed a complaint in August about Trump’s July 25th phone call with the Ukrainian president. While Democrats and the left-leaning media have gone nuts over the idea of releasing the name of the whistleblower — House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff just did it by total accident. On Tuesday, scumbag-Schiff released the transcript of the committee’s interview with top U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor. But he forgot to redact the name of the man many believe to be the whistleblower: Eric Ciaramella. In the transcript, the interviewer asks Taylor if the name of the man who has been widely reported as the whistleblower “rings a bell?” Taylor responds, “It doesn’t.” “So, to your knowledge, you never had any communications with somebody by that name?” Taylor is asked, to which he replies, “Correct.” Turning Point USA’s Benny Johnson shared a screenshot of the transcript, which he says mean two things: either Ciaramella is not the whistleblower or the Democrats are total idiots for not redacting the name. Democrats are putting pretty much all of their faith into the “whistleblower” and hoping he will give them ammunition to take down the president. Late last month, bombshell report from Real Clear Investigations reveals that the whistleblower is Ciaramella...   https://explainlife.com/idiot-schiff-releases-transcript-forgets-to-redact-alleged-whistleblowers-name-17285/?utm_source=Explainlife.com%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email   
Anti-Trump Whistleblower’s Attorney: ‘Coup 
Has Started,’ ‘We Will Get Rid’ Of Trump
lfKkPaytckyw7Dfq77BEvn8DYzgF0UyLTymy9wgLW9d_utMKPyAZm48Q1aApIFhnYSJUHavmaPtOQHOByoTTlNnimkb9inQH8dx6z_Pxa1ajBxttl6sZHoKD3yCRVf8Laulk9g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Tristan Justice
{ thefederalist.com } ~ One of the attorneys representing the whistleblower at the heart of the partisan Democratic impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump, Mark Zaid... tweeted in 2017 just days after the president took office that a “coup has started,” and that “impeachment will follow ultimately.” Throughout the first few years of Trump’s presidency, Zaid has reaffirmed his commitment to remove the president from office through impeachment. In July 2017, Zaid wrote, “We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters,” and later remarked that one day history will be reciting the tales of Trump’s impeachment. This is the same attorney who once threatened to get his federal intelligence contacts to doxx a random Twitter user and complained about the account’s anonymity. “Hey ‘Rex’, why don’t you reveal your identity instead of attacking someone while hiding? I’d love to have my intelligence and law enforcement clients see what they can find about your  life,” Zaid wrote. Zaid’s bias against the president has been well-documented. In a podcast last year, Zaid spoke about how he often goes out of his way just to use the term “resistance,” and bragged about having sued every president since 1993. On the same podcast, Zaid also discussed fishing for a client to serve as a plaintiff against Trump in a lawsuit alleging unfair business practices stifling competition by the Trump hotel. The attorney also went on Twitter to call for whistleblowers to come forward when Trump took power, welcoming CIA employees to his law firm “to lawfully challenge” the president, according to Fox News...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/07/anti-trump-whistleblowers-attorney-coup-has-started-we-will-get-rid-of-trump/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=96c5f02e68-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-96c5f02e68-83771801 
Puerto Rico senator, 7 others arrested 
by FBI in corruption investigation
VyJDNT_gW4Y7wJwhlZb_c4n-7WztNSweoA_oVteUrmOAq8Nk2aUkhYt9a87QHz2IwigZXasbHVKMMDvlK9O-Ri8ohgsAR5G3P4ghkfvKRHVaplPF9yAC4aih3tsroeq5Zt286cZiaEe_dsoTeEGyCeJE8HOK36r1CGyYJ4AVQqBnqOny62g7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Nicole Darrah 
{ foxnews.com } ~ A Puerto Rico senator awaiting trial on fraud charges was taken into custody Wednesday morning by federal authorities in connection with an investigation into alleged corruption... that also resulted in the arrests of seven others, officials said. Abel Nazario, a 49-year-old currently serving in the U.S. territory's 26th Senate, was apprehended as part of the probe, an FBI spokesperson said, but further information on the nature of the charges was not immediately revealed. Information was not immediately available about the seven others who were arrested Wednesday in connection with the probe. Following Nazario's arrest, Puerto Rico's Senate President, Thomas Rivera Shatz, asked for Nazario's resignation. A spokesperson for Nazario told the Associated Press the senator maintains his innocence. Nazario was previously arrested by federal authorities in September 2018 on charges of wire fraud and falsifying documents, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Puerto Rico. He was accused of defrauding his employees while serving as the mayor of Yauco, a southwestern town in Puerto Rico, where he was an elected official from 2000 until December 2016. Prosecutors allege that, while he was mayor, municipal employees were required "to work two voluntary hours per day" — which the U.S. Department of Labor determined was a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Nazario agreed to pay nearly $590,000 in back wages to 177 employees. Authorities, however, said they later learned the city of Yauco was withholding employees’ wages, despite Nazario’s pledge that he would not retaliate against workers...   https://www.foxnews.com/us/puerto-rico-senator-7-others-arrested-by-fbi-in-corruption-investigation   
Iranian Agents in US Plead Guilty
Saudi Agents Arrested
Yca6LKLdByNLRbS8P326t999D8GNC8oKWH_L3LQ28bVAGjU1J5RruTWicHMg9jbBIHBJWXVNevkSSdzA_ybHuu9b_2ZfZhfEYKYZj4z8fSzenoL0seVIsNp29xYwiN5VfVj4PqQKkUX7glSdgSZVHIVHfTlbHmcTDSjvjxH6NChf92j56ODvFQ-X4ITeH569cV6RZPD0SIRaag=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by clarionproject.org ~ Two Iranians pleaded guilty to acting as illegal agents of the Iranian government in the U.S. ... Ahmadreza Mohammadi-Doostdar, 39, an Iranian with dual U.S. citizenship, and Majid Ghorbani, 60, were caught running surveillance on Jewish facilities and events in the U.S. in support of the Mujahdein-e Khalq (MEK), an exiled Iranian resistance group that advocates for the complete overthrow of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his Islamist regime. According to an FBI affidavit, the two Iranian agents were also preparing “target packages” – i.e., attacks — on individuals who posed threats to the Iranian regime on American soil. Meanwhile, two former employees of Twitter were charged by the Justice Department with acting as illegal foreign agents of Saudi Arabia in the U.S. The Saudi men are accused of using their positions at the company to aid Saudi Arabia by acquiring information on American citizens who oppose the policies of the kingdom and its leaders. The accused were named as Ali Alzabarah, an engineer with the company who had access to personal information, account data and internet protocol addresses of Twitter users, and Ahmad Abouammo, who was a media partnerships manager and had access to email addresses and phone numbers of users. The Iranian agents, who have been in custody since their arrests, both struck deals with their prosecutors for reduced sentences in exchange for pleading guilty. According to the original indictment against the Iranians, Doostdar traveled to the United States from Iran in the summer of 2017 to collect intelligence information about entities and individuals considered by the government of Iran to be their enemies — namely, Israeli and Jewish interests. Doostdar is alleged to have conducted surveillance of the Rohr Chabad House, a Jewish institution in Chicago, including photographing the security features surrounding the facility...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Dems Trickle Out Impeachment 
Testimony Transcripts
T5FqM5LSgUAz0Jb-oa1S-v1Reirgu2BCRswzptBQCQkECRkm5hkLKFiBA0GnSowkQKQH5f_i_INa367dNFYRyjVfVufJ0rQod9Si7RutktZobMTB5GXDw8ZHm119AO-zOUeabIwVKg2zxGyPBttQeDuBgMpAGSA8lA4j1bo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  On Monday, House Democrats, led by Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, released two transcripts from their closed-door impeachment hearings. The transcripts were from testimonies given by the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Maria Yovanovitch, and the former top aide to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Michael McKinley.
 

Neither of the witnesses had direct knowledge of the July 25 phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which was the alleged impetus behind the “whistleblower” complaint. However, Democrats allege that Trump removed Yovanovitch in May 2019 because she was proving to be an obstacle to Rudy Giuliani’s investigation into loose lips liar-Joe and Hunter Biden and Ukraine’s involvement in 2016 election interference.

Interestingly, Yovanovitch asserted, “It’s not like we had a policy that Ukraine should not become involved in our domestic politics or, you know, somehow become involved in 2020 elections, but clearly that is not in U.S. interests for Ukraine to start playing such a role.” This statement seems to effectively undercut the Democrats’ whole argument for claiming that Trump engaged in an impeachable offense. In other words, he had a legitimate interest in fighting Ukrainian corruption.

McKinley’s testimony was primarily focused on his frustration over Yovanovitch’s treatment and eventual removal. He was troubled by Pompeo’s refusal to push back against Donald Trump Jr.‘s negative comments against Yovanovitch and by Pompeo’s unwillingness to allow the State Department to issue statements in support of the ambassador. “In 37 years in the Foreign Service and different parts of the globe and working on many controversial issues, working 10 years back in Washington, I had never seen that,” McKinley stated regarding Ukrainian officials expressing concerns over Giuliani’s investigation into the 2016 election.

Cleary, Democrats are still trying to control the anti-Trump narrative as they selectively release these transcripts rather than releasing the entirety at once. Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan blasted scumbag-Schiff and company for their obvious politicization, lamenting, “Democrats cherry-pick which transcripts they release and when. Why not release Ambassador Volker’s testimony? He was the very first witness to testify.” scumbag-Schiff plans to release two more transcripts today.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66582?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thurs/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
New York vs. Trump's Taxes
KaNE9yDt3hFLsdFJ5jGwSty07QyXf0TuplqFPauVpZ1cjN2YlTT1hQhVwNQDvTaLLrfXuaY3wLXhzqCERfNUVYhVZqvJiyvU9AMozB5LPt8CGqZrtliWgFIg-kiMS7NhqPr7xX4CH-OEyBO8XgzuVLMDKJWv_q3vgkGwLaU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Thursday Top News Executive Summary
-GosogP-QF9SS205duA_h8obPf_k3B1b2J9JlVYbEfJKSnLJ1ArFfgwN1p90y7uFJsbV1mHrvmI_6gcL2Rvz-WNbTOole4_EXRJG2TmD-lkQK6bu9maNpVs73yAJnQYTCDURi0H7InlY8s7v5pS_YVIDmMqqPl936sl3y4c=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors;  Above the Fold


DEEP-STATE COLLUSION: Whistleblower attorney Mark S. Zaid tweeted of Trump “coup” and “rebellion” in January of 2017 (The Washington Times)

TARIFFS BEING PHASED OUT: China says it has agreed with U.S. to gradually cancel tariffs, which should help to ameliorate the $38 billion consumer price tag (Reuters)

Government & Politics


“FAKE OUTRAGE”: Rand Paul blocks Senate resolution backing protection for whistleblowers (The Hill)

PREPARE THE POPCORN: Impeachment going public: Hearings next week for all to see (Associated Press)

FRENEMIES SCHEDULED TO MEET: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will visit White House next week (Washington Examiner)

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM QUASHED: Federal judge strikes down rule allowing clinicians to object to abortions for moral or religious reasons (NBC News)

Big Brother


MORE TIME FOR INDOCTRINATION: lowlife-Kamala Harris proposes a 10-hour school day (The Daily Wire)

INDEFENSIBLE: A Michigan man underpaid his property taxes by $8.41. The county seized his property, sold it — and kept the profits. (Reason)

National Security


ALIEN SURGE: Illegal-immigrant population inside U.S. surged 550,000 in 2019 (Washington Examiner)

EATING CROW: DOJ charges two former Twitter employees with spying for Saudi Arabia (National Review)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: Time for the Supreme Court to clearly protect religious freedoms (Washington Examiner)

POLICY: How Trump is reshaping the courts (The Daily Signal)

HUMOR: Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren’s plan to pay for Medicare for All: Spend so much that the national debt clock rolls over to zero (The Babylon Bee)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/66646?mailing_id=4639&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4639&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
diGenova and Toensing on Upcoming IG Report: 
“it’s going to be worse than you can imagine”
XX4qMKbLgd_6SsiNGr9CJtW4WN1qzfgyOM1R1SCDhIkD1a_qoLFHO7-vcHBRTFHzJE9rQl8SA_t45Kcu4cEKADA9qOlzgXtCrJC0d9TZcOSAU6OgV8jYEjsp77jXuJ7uk8wbcWk6VCnPzniIRS-EVSieCNqS=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing appeared on Fox News to discuss issues surrounding the ongoing investigations of Inspector General Michael Horowitz and U.S. Attorney John Durham... Mr. diGenova and Ms. Toensing bring the tick-tock hammer to the audience. According to Ms. Toensing the upcoming IG report is going to be “very bad for people in the scumbag/liar-nObama administration.”  Toensing went on to say, according to her sources, “it’s going to be worse than you can imagine.” Mr. diGenova went on to say: “it’s going to be devastating” … “it’s going to ruin careers” etc.  Mr diGenova has a great deal of confidence in AG Barr, Horowitz and Durham.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/06/digenova-and-toensing-on-upcoming-ig-report-its-going-to-be-worse-than-you-can-imagine/  
.
Do Not Support China's Huawei,
Cripple It Instead
gQAiuKgEe_8hAYwvY7L6t2Rac5HMtYAFi9LrrEGsMRV6Gs-3ARrqYzsOPqlXJaRWn9PJNepGV9bgOVG3wIhayBzTDg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Gordon G. Chang
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ "A prominent Republican who advises President Donald Trump called America's 5G strategy 'the biggest strategic disaster in U.S. history,'"... wrote China-watcher David Goldman recently. Many people will regard that as an exaggeration, but America's failure to have a 5G strategy will almost certainly prove to have historic consequences. "5G" is shorthand for the fifth generation of wireless communication. "In the very near future, dominating the wireless world will be tantamount to dominating the world," wrote Newt Gingrich in Newsweek in February. That is not an exaggeration. Why not? With speeds 2,000 times faster than existing 4G networks, 5G will permit near-universal connectivity to homes, vehicles, machines, robots, and everything plugged into the Internet of Things (IoT). Moreover, with just about everything connected to everything else China will filch the world's information. That is not a theoretical concern. For instance, nightly from 2012 to 2017, China surreptitiously downloaded data from the Chinese-built-and-donated headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa. Chinese parties have already been criminally taking American information, intellectual property and data for decades, worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year. This continuing crime is essential to China's implementation of numerous industrial policies, especially the controversial "Made in China 2025" initiative, a decade-long program to achieve dominance in technology sectors, including 5G. Theft is by no means the full extent of the harm. China, with control of 5G, will be in a position to remotely manipulate the world's devices. In peacetime, Beijing could have the ability to drive cars off cliffs, unlock front doors, and turn off pacemakers. In war, Beijing could paralyze critical infrastructure. "China's game," Goldman wrote in an e-mail, "is to control the broadband, and then the e-commerce, and then the e-finance, and then all the tech startups servicing the 'ecosystem,' and then the logistics." As he told me this year, "The world will become a Chinese company store."...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15138/china-cripple-huawei 
Democrats Release Deposition Of 
Their Star Witness In Impeachment Inquiry
mC0EQ1HcGKwUbOITT3zHhPiMxDq3jiT9A170F2nh1VbR6V6BR01CbqXq8XO2jWYraVJ-r41KwP7BO83FPl07zTU7BgKL4ypXy5J6o5XTGZGkGq7_AaFeIUfmzkf0AmIp1FF-ClkpK6gmQ4SFQ6z_7KCILUFLeQhDONMy4ICqh1Dz0hOC9kQzcoJCEpLNYMTEonkfKQWlOOukZwOIDjn59w92_RSiDG_nwiW6dk8EcFWE55E=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by CHUCK ROSS
{ dailycaller.com } ~ House Democrats on Wednesday released a transcript of a deposition from Bill Taylor, the U.S. diplomat who Democrats consider one of their top witnesses... in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. In his Oct. 22 deposition, Taylor testified at length about his work with two other diplomats, EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, and former Ukraine special envoy Kurt Volker, as part of an overall effort to improve relations between the U.S. and Ukraine.  Democrats announced prior to the release that Taylor is one of three witnesses scheduled to testify next week in the first wave of public hearings in the impeachment inquiry. Taylor will testify next Wednesday, along with George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs.  Democrats highlighted several excerpts from Taylor’s testimony that they believe supports their push to impeach Trump. One of those is an exchange that Taylor had with Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, in which the diplomat said that he developed a “clear understanding” that U.S. military aid to Ukraine was contingent on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly committing to opening an investigation into potential Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, as well as into Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy firm linked to Hunter Biden.  Democrats have alleged that Trump abused his office by offering Zelensky with a quid pro quo involving the investigations. Several witnesses, including Taylor, have testified that they suspected that a quid pro quo was on the table. But so far, none have testified they heard directly from Trump that military aid was contingent on the investigations. Taylor made it clear in the deposition that his suspicions about a possible quid pro quo were based on information in an Aug. 28 news report in Politico, as well as a second-hand summary of a conversation that Sondland had on Sept. 1 with a top adviser to Zelensky...   https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/bill-taylor-testimony-ukraine/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=10823   
It’s Time For The United States 
To Wage War On Mexican Drug Cartels  
mrQXTMMjyhs7d7Z-LWLNZJdeJ8TqH0J9YpifAHeWKmDp6KRoYAXeQ7_0rG8D7zVUjxfi0JlSn9DCpMsa-FoVC_6EgFDm_TzLs0VwP1IvNHGaJenaE7rA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By John Daniel Davidson 
{ thefederalist.com } ~ The American family gunned down Monday in northern Mexico should be a wake-up call for U.S. policymakers that the spiraling cartel violence in Mexico is not going to remain south of the Rio Grande... and that the time has come to fight back against the cartels—unilaterally, if need be. The brazen daylight ambush, in which at least six children and three women from a Mormon community near the U.S.-Mexico border were killed, is the latest flashpoint in the growing instability of the Mexican state and the country’s descent into warlordism. Simply put, some areas of Mexico are under the de facto control of drug cartels. Last month, hundreds of gunmen with the Sinaloa cartel besieged the city of Culiacan after Mexican National Guard troops arrested one of the sons of the infamous drug kingpin Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán Loera. In a stunning display of coordination and overwhelming force, cartel gunmen eventually forced the military to release El Chapo’s son and surrender, a decision Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador later defended. Monday’s attack, in the northern Mexican state of Sonora, targeted the LeBarón family, members of a Mormon community of dual Mexican and American citizens who have lived in the border region for decades. It was unclear why the caravan of three vehicles came under fire, but gruesome news reports detailed the intentional slaughter of defenseless women and children, some of whom were burned to death inside their vehicles. Family members told The New York Times that one child was gunned down while running away. President Trump on Tuesday called on President López Obrador to wage war on the cartels, “wipe them off the face of the earth,” and offered America’s assistance, saying it sometimes takes “an army to defeat an army.” López Obrador was quick to decline the offer. “It’s not in agreement with our convictions. The worst thing is war,” he said, echoing slogans he often repeats about cartel violence and ending the drug war like, “Hugs, not gunshots,” and “You can’t fight fire with fire.” Upon winning the presidency last year, López Obrador all but declared an end to the drug war, saying he would instead tackle the “root causes” of cartel violence, which he claims are poverty and lack of opportunity. His main security policy has been the creation of the National Guard, a 60,000-strong force largely comprised of military and naval police, as well as former officers from Mexico’s famously corrupt federal police. It was a contingent of National Guard troops that was defeated by Sinaloa gunmen in Culiacan, and to date the force has mostly been used to patrol the northern and southern borders in effort to crack down on illegal immigration from Central America... Mr. President its time to take action.  https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/06/its-time-for-the-united-states-to-wage-war-on-mexican-drug-cartels/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newslink&utm_term=members&utm_content=20191106211014  
.
Erdogan: Turkey Captures Slain 
ISIS Leader al-Baghdadi’s Wife
US%2Bspecial%2Bforces%2BBaghdadi%2Bkilled.jpg
by David Kaiser
{ wizbangblog.com  } ~ The first question that comes to mind is “Which wife?” Al-Baghdadi was known to have four wives, plus several ex-wives, one of whom was arrested in Lebanon in 2014... and freed a year later in a prisoner swap with al-Qaida. The 2nd question is “What part did the ‘intelligence gold mine’ obtained from the capture of al-Baghdadi’s elder sister days earlier play in the wife capture?” “The ISIS leader blew himself up during an Oct. 26 raid by U.S. special forces on his heavily fortified safe house in the Syrian province of Idlib. Erdogan’s announcement comes just days after Turkish forces captured al-Baghdadi’s elder sister, identified as Rasmiya Awad, in the town of Azaz, in Aleppo province in northwestern Syria.…Awad was with her husband, daughter-in-law and five children when she was detained. A Turkish official said the 65-year-old sister is suspected of being affiliated with the extremist group and called her capture an intelligence “gold mine.” Authorities had posted a picture of the sister. It was not Immediately clear if Awad’s capture led to intelligence that allowed for the detention of the wife. One of al-Baghdadi’s wives is an Iraqi known by the name of Nour, the daughter of one of his aides, Abu Abdullah al-Zubaie. She was identified by name by al-Baghdadi’s brother-in-law in a recent interview with al-Arabiya TV. The brother-in-law, Mohamad Ali Sajit, who is in Iraqi custody, said al-Baghdadi had four wives when he last met him, sometime last summer.” ‘When he last met him.’ Apparently, interchangeable wife-ing is given some type of imprimatur under Islamic law. But given their fondness for child brides, I’m not surprised...   https://www.wizbangblog.com/2019/11/06/erdogan-turkey-captures-slain-isis-leader-al-baghdadis-wife/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Wizbang+%28Wizbang%29 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
New York vs. Trump's Taxes
KaNE9yDt3hFLsdFJ5jGwSty07QyXf0TuplqFPauVpZ1cjN2YlTT1hQhVwNQDvTaLLrfXuaY3wLXhzqCERfNUVYhVZqvJiyvU9AMozB5LPt8CGqZrtliWgFIg-kiMS7NhqPr7xX4CH-OEyBO8XgzuVLMDKJWv_q3vgkGwLaU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  Donald Trump’s tax returns have long been a point of contention between him and those who are bent on taking him out. To be sure, he probably has some taxing questions he’d rather not publicly answer, which is why he reneged on his campaign promise to follow the traditional practice of presidential candidates by releasing them. But he also has every right to keep those returns concealed. Except that’s not what another court has ruled.

“The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that President Trump’s accounting firm must hand over eight years of corporate tax returns to the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, upholding a subpoena for the documents submitted by the D.A. earlier this year,” reports National Review. Trump plans to petition the U.S. Supreme Court, but NBC News notes, “Past Supreme Court rulings have upheld subpoenas directed at presidents, and this time the local prosecutors are seeking documents from the Trump Organization and Trump’s accountants — not directly from the president himself.”

We’ve warned about the danger Trump faces in New York, because what prosecutors are looking for is evidence that Trump violated campaign-finance law related to his (alleged) affairs and hush-money payoffs to Playboy model Karen McDougal and porn star Stormy Daniels. Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, was sentenced to three years in prison for violating campaign-finance law with payments made to Daniels. The government of New York has politically targeted Trump, but he provided the opening.

Speaking of taxes and New York, the president announced last week that he’s leaving the Empire State to make his permanent residence in the Sunshine State instead. Florida has no income tax, compared to New York’s onerous high taxes. And, Trump noted, “Despite the fact that I pay millions of dollars in city, state and local taxes each year, I have been treated very badly by the political leaders of both the city and state. Few have been treated worse. I hated having to make this decision, but in the end it will be best for all concerned.”

He’s not alone. New York loses more people each year than any other state, and its high taxes are the primary reason. According to a Bloomberg story in August, “New York leads all U.S. metro areas as the largest net loser with 277 people moving every day — more than double the exodus of 132 just one year ago.” Trump is right that few have been treated worse than he has, but that doesn’t mean New York treats anyone all that well. When a dollar goes so much further in Florida, why wouldn’t a New Yorker move?   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66581?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thursday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Ukraine's 2016 Anti-Trump InterferenceWYnUqC503CukxnFgzUZn4hs8UDHXkXNisQim72JP4zZy43NjYMSKrQOpJkkHRcEHOrLBb65J76JEQIeQFRAmvtb0smzlHKE74_Pfsa1H9pPowNUNU32KdNWXJISknYrbxZjBTmyBkkaY7vgSJhtmcn750M1CKwdMqyxULj8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Political Editors  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
House Votes to 'Enhance the Border Security'
of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and
Tunisia--Not the USA
IdGZHicvvGpB03ObEY5s8qC43DlzDpSqxA5TAV3EsI9eJ-6vcI0QOXcwY-kC93wpQkJqroSQ_TDWJqKygzO60UVzxw-ntt6-cmyCfpsHyZSBO3EqVtDq-Z_YY6QlXh7xqxrx7gkCFOMbfZ6mYQSfp9Ormbso_iBg7xg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Terence P. Jeffrey
{ cnsnews.com } ~ The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives has voted to fund efforts to "enhance the border security" of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and Tunisia... while moving to deny all funding to build walls, fencing or any other structures to enhance the border security of the United States. Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants have their priorities. To them, borders on the other side of the world are more important than our own. On June 19, the House approved a massive spending bill. In an act of legislative polygamy, it "married" the appropriations bill for the Department of Defense to the appropriations bills for the Department of State, the Department of Energy, and the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education. The Congressional Budget Office estimated this monstrosity would cost taxpayers $984.7 billion in fiscal 2020. Yet there is one thing this bill would forbid the Trump administration from spending one penny to accomplish. On page 304 (of 650), it says: "None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any prior Department of Defense appropriations Acts may be used to construct a wall, fence, border barriers, or border security infrastructure along the southern land border of the United States." A month later, the House Appropriations Committee sent the full House a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security. This bill — so far — is unmarried and would cost taxpayers $63.8 billion. President Trump had requested that it include $5 billion to use in constructing barriers at the border. How much did the committee give him? "No funding is provided in the bill for new physical barriers along the southwest border," said the committee report...  Democrat-controlled House of Representatives are sick and stupid and should be removed.  https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/house-votes-enhance-border-security-jordan-lebanon-egypt-and-tunisia   
President Trump Delivers Remarks 
on Federal Judicial Confirmations
YikCLHlmU6jt3BJv2Y4XrCNB-u7K5RfR6I-eq26Df2c3SbXjJymRDejchxXK5keA0dB0cpkbTPbL5W3kjDL8Fgx6xKRVwy7DhgM7ier0k0ZUjh3vxPrekA4Ph5Pdr9spqiCBikbO--l-lbXpwYVA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Today President Trump will be delivering remarks from the East room during an event about judicial confirmations.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/06/president-trump-delivers-remarks-on-federal-judicial-confirmations-315pm-et-livestream/  
.
In Politics, everything is Quid Pro Quo
uJYvVXO6d95d-W_-R3U2zP30iMexPobDFUVYAY1YBTxT-uFmVv1a45tXnlS5S4LFAoq1bsolHWQfad_JWqEtv9mwHfBr_vDjnoE212G0KZMVfYBDYJg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Brian Joondeph
{ americanthinker.com } ~ “Quid pro quo” is a term being thrown around these days as the latest gambit to “get Trump” after everything else has been tried and failed. It’s a Latin term meaning, "something for something,"... an exchange of acts or things of approximately equal value. As value is in the eye of the beholder, the something being exchanged for another something may not be equal in value, instead skewed based on one’s perspective. Democrats and their media masters are salivating over now having what they believe is a smoking gun to take down President Trump. Notwithstanding that this must be their hundredth smoking gun, and that each previous one misfired, they are hot on impeachment over this Latin term “quid pro quo.” The Washington Post, happy to let democracy die in darkness while they endeavor to overturn the last presidential election, is giddy over quid pro quo. They published this recent headline, “Growing number of GOP senators consider acknowledging Trump’s quid pro quo on Ukraine.” Big deal -- senators are considering something. Many are also considering whether to run for reelection or accept a large campaign contribution from some dodgy donor but “considering” is far from doing. What are they considering? Voting to convict the President if such a vote ever reaches the Senate? No, they are considering whether to acknowledge that the President demanded a quid pro quo. I will make it easy for them. Yes, he did, just as every member of Congress does, each and every day. In politics, quid pro quo is standard operating procedure. Take campaign contributions, for example. I contribute to Senator X because I want Senator X to support legislation favorable to my business interests. My money, something of value, will be exchanged for a tax break or new regulation, which is usually of greater value to me, as a quid pro quo, and perfectly legal and acceptable. A bundler for a presidential candidate raises millions of dollars for said candidate. If that candidate wins the presidency, the bundler may have a choice of any number of ambassadorships around the world. The value of the campaign cash is exchanged for a four-year stint living in the American embassy in London or Paris, attending parties and banquets. Something for something...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/in_politics_everything_is_quid_pro_quo.html   
Andy McCarthy: No crime in transcripts
xSWYwRzv5VVdGxtHtwMhxbUGJqdwkRajNwaSzB1WM0gNuoCHXZEYJV89ApuUb_n1cMBz42iqDxWx8JNXU3zBEiO6ZSqhHFstJpbg-aBaGIQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by wnd.com ~ House Democrats who released transcripts of the testimonies of former ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and former Ukraine special envoy Kurt Volker contend... they bolster the case for impeachment of President Trump. But former assistant U.S. attorney Andrew C. McCarthy said Tuesday he doesn't see any crimes or actions worthy of impeachment. "It seems to me like a really botched situation," he said. "And what I'm fearful of, frankly, is we're all going to strain our brains for the next few weeks to get to the bottom of what actually happened here, and what we're going to find is that it's much ado about nothing. He emphasized that "a lot of people had an idea about doing things that they shouldn't have done, but ultimately nothing ever happened." "You know, the Ukrainians got their aid — nothing ended up being pulled back from them. They didn't have to make a commitment to investigate the loose lips liar-Bidens." He believes Ukraine should have been asked to investigate the loose lips liar-Bidens for violations of Ukrainian law, and the aid should not have been delayed after Congress passed it and the president signed the legislation. The best defense, he said, is going to be, "No harm, no foul." In a tweet Monday, McCarthy wrote: "The president's best defense continues to be that any misconduct in his dealings with Ukraine was not impeachable under the circumstances. The sooner he and GOP defenders shift away from 'perfect' and to that, the better off they'll be."...  https://www.wnd.com/2019/11/andy-mccarthy-no-crime-transcripts/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking  
.
DOJ orders House Dems to allow 
White House lawyers during testimony
e1_dJq0F1YJmVGoHXr8TCLkyCF2MkzcNdsxRwGS5Lc0CJQfmkPsNqJ7-6OwX1kF0RChi7gch3yj20xu_2lUAGuHblMcCdqPr-7QACU478rs99S8OVlBU-N-t3SDTLc5A08duQV_s2kABsZ-arZIqDYzA5bHnGCkaRL1t80Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By M. Dowling
{ independentsentinel.com } ~ The DOJ had to publish a memo to House Democrats explaining that committees investigating Trump’s impeachment must allow White House attorneys present or the testimonies will be legally invalid... CNN reported that the Justice Department explained attempts by impeachment investigators to compel testimony from executive branch witnesses about President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine are “legally invalid” unless they allow for the witnesses to bring a government lawyer. CNN said it will anger Democrats as it will further the “non-cooperation from the White House.” They are concerned the White House and other agencies will “use it to stymie House depositions.” The Democrats don’t seem to understand the separation of powers. Subpoenaed witnesses are not showing up just like scumbag/liar-nObama staffers didn’t show up during IRS targeting and scumbag/liar-Hillary email investigations. The DOJ says there must be a White House lawyer present to protect privileged information. The House Intel committee has only allowed personal lawyers. The five-page memo is limited in scope but there will be future fights over executive privilege. As we said, the Democrats don’t understand the separation of powers. OLC attorneys cite a DC Circuit court opinion comparing an impeachment inquiry with a grand jury investigation in a criminal probe, setting up the need to meet a high threshold to overcome the protections of the privilege, CNN stated further. scumbag-Schiff calls everything “obstruction of justice” and affords no civil rights to the President. He knows he must allow White House attorneys. He simply doesn’t care.   https://www.independentsentinel.com/doj-orders-house-dems-to-allow-white-house-lawyers-during-testimony/   
Bevin campaign requests Kentucky recanvass 
after election results deemed 'too close to call'
9KzqHReyAWHME13qL9menUFR08YN2rXUxUiKHKgjhGStxMSZ80kzFlXZeBiHUzDiJt-k7tRKi8FVSjBUsY3z0zgcOJxDZtTChenDc23uJOeWFScFbZ8ryBqRb7yiS754vdDRlywN5v9yZI5brqLI1uaOZ-9B7qcwRNDDk3jP20AhA2tJKNzi-g_OM7h6QHDTSK4-53PT-fnyveQ9H8kcCaOZ9Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Vandana Rambaran 
{ foxnews.com } ~ Republican incumbent Gov. Matt Bevin is requesting a recanvass in Kentucky's gubernatorial race after initial results from Tuesday night showed he trailed by about 5,000 votes... “The people of Kentucky deserve a fair and honest election. With reports of irregularities, we are exercising the right to ensure that every lawful vote was counted,” Bevin's campaign said in a statement on Wednesday, ahead of a planned news conference. Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Grimes later announced the recanvass will be conducted on Nov. 14 at 9 a.m. A recanvassing requires the county election boards to recheck each machine and report the figures back to the county clerk. Members of both parties are allowed to be present during the recanvassing process. The Associated Press said it could not declare a winner of the closely watched race, owing to the tight margin. The Democratic National Committee and Democrat Andy Beshear's campaign, however, claimed victory. The race has national implications for President Trump, who campaigned in Bevin's home state on Monday to drum up support for the candidate who was neck and neck with Beshear, the state's attorney general. Trump dominated Kentucky in the 2016 presidential elections, winning the state by 30 points and Bevin leaned on the president's popularity to carry him to the finish line. The Republican governor has alienated some supporters by pushing to cut state pension programs and hammering public school teachers for striking -- including his suggestion that the striking teachers indirectly bore responsibility for the  shooting of a 7-year-old girl who remained at home because of school closures. Still, when the race showed signs of teetering towards a win for Beshear, Trump appeared to distance himself from the potential defeat, saying that if Bevin lost, it wouldn't be because of Trump...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ukraine's 2016 Anti-Trump InterferenceWYnUqC503CukxnFgzUZn4hs8UDHXkXNisQim72JP4zZy43NjYMSKrQOpJkkHRcEHOrLBb65J76JEQIeQFRAmvtb0smzlHKE74_Pfsa1H9pPowNUNU32KdNWXJISknYrbxZjBTmyBkkaY7vgSJhtmcn750M1CKwdMqyxULj8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Political Editors:  Now that House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi has held her party-line vote on proceeding with the Democrats’ impeachment “inquiry” over a “whistleblower” complaint charging that President Donald Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to dig up dirt on loose lips liar-Joe Biden, it may behoove our readers to note why Trump is so interested in Ukraine. Here’s one piece of that puzzle.

Recall back in 2016 Trump’s campaign was hit with a New York Times story alleging that Paul Manafort, his campaign manager at the time, had nefarious ties to the Kremlin via his former client Viktor Yanukovych, the ousted pro-Russian Ukrainian president. Manafort resigned days later after a Times follow-up story revealed more details of a “black ledger” in which handwritten off-the-book payments made to Manafort by Yanukovych’s political party.

scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s campaign quickly took advantage of the embarrassing story and used it as fodder to push the narrative that Trump was in cahoots with the Russians. It can certainly be argued that Trump should have done a better job in screening Manafort, as he clearly became a dangerous liability.

The question is, however, is this: How did the Times come upon its bombshell report? The simple answer is Ukraine. Two weeks after Manafort’s resignation, the Financial Times reported that a Ukrainian member of parliament, Sehei Leshchenko, along with the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, was worried at “the prospect of Mr. Trump, who praised Ukraine’s arch-enemy Vladimir Putin, becoming leader of the country’s biggest ally.” That worry “spurred not just Mr. Leshchenko but Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election.”

But the bigger question that remains unanswered — the one on which Trump may have had Rudy Giuliani digging for answers — was, who was responsible for alerting the Ukrainians to the mysterious “black ledger?”   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66522?mailing_id=4629&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4629&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Wednesday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Want Better Schools? Parents, It's Up to You
_3-rJYU-cyWlGuNXd1cbMkk_ze4t6ff3H-Zbck25t9bDfiaPMEfFZFRmF50s1GS5RYoi7ZHmDMS5o_xQIPNtynaDQxTnLVpd82MU3lSsUwJaTRyrc0aeeiagAF0WYZk_gDjyXkLoIEysCojEUcXwqw1OtfYeSWafZPiQ3o0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Iran injects uranium gas into Fordo 
centrifuges, in worst breach of nuke deal
68mg9sZoI-LqPXr1j0mdTigthuNSxyXRA8GOyWt-r1HuT55v8TrbeM7DcYpv6I3R_4IfpoZinP_--F020Oa0Tq1P4YDqAbs-WzbZjKiRR_lESYzFDraD2cNklw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ Iran began inserting uranium gas into centrifuges at the Fordo nuclear facility, state television announced Wednesday, marking its latest step away from the nuclear deal... Iranian state media said uranium hexafluoride gas was injected into advanced centrifuges at the Fordo nuclear facility Wednesday, a day after Iran announced the move. It said inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency were on hand. As part of the 2015 accord with world powers limiting its nuclear program, Iran was barred from enriching uranium at Fordo, which was converted to a research center. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who announced the move Tuesday, confirmed on Twitter that enrichment activity had restarted at Fordo, converting the facility back into an active enrichment center. A centrifuge enriches uranium by rapidly spinning uranium hexafluoride gas. Since the United States pulled out of the nuclear deal last year and imposed tough sanctions, Iran has taken a number of steps to curb its adherence to the international agreement in a bid to receive economic relief from the European signatories to the pact. “Iran has taken its fourth step to decrease its nuclear commitments to the deal in reaction to the increased US pressure and inactivity of European parties to the deal to save it,” Iran’s state TV said...  The IAEA were on hand shows how worthless they are.  https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-begins-injecting-uranium-gas-into-centrifuges-at-fordo/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2019-11-06&utm_medium=email   
Real Talk: Impeachment Is Going Poorly 
For Democrats And The Media 
8iUlff3dE517j8AyS7M1xiHET9iu0dXwk3mT6y-eA09Oas6DfEN15ry0k1wGrOStYHISExFgVvLooe1p3ht3L5N9EsgX7shFuG8zsm6qZoPNabVT_1Pdlcmpqs8rGGy6EhU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Mollie Hemingway
{ thefederalist.com } ~ Impeachment is going so poorly for the media and other Democrats that “Meet The Press” host Chuck Todd was forced to broadcast false information to support it... A graphic was posted on Sunday’s show that purported to identify how many people in the president’s party voted in support of an impeachment inquiry in the cases of Presidents scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. It accurately noted that 31 Democrats voted in favor of impeachment proceedings for scumbag/liar-Clinton. But it inaccurately claimed that a single Republican had voted in favor of House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi’s impeachment rules last week. There are multiple problems with this graphic. For one thing, zero Republicans voted with House Democrats last week. Zero point zero. Zilch. Nada. None. For another, Todd’s team is hiding the bipartisan nature of the opposition to the vote last week. Not only did not a single Republican vote with Democrats, two Democrats voted with Republicans in opposition. Todd knows that no Republicans voted for impeachment, despite the graphic he put up on national television. In fact, he said during the show, “I have one with an asterisk here. I don’t know what you do with Justin Amash. It’s not a zero. At the same time, he’s not a Republican anymore.” I know what you do with that, Chuck. You don’t lie and call him a Republican. Todd himself gave Amash national media attention for leaving the Republican Party in dramatic fashion, interviewing him two weeks prior. In the first six seconds of the interview, he noted twice that Amash was not a Republican. The impeachment inquiry, such as it is, has tremendous struggles. It’s been conducted in secret, with heavy control from Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the man who falsely claimed for years he had evidence of Trump’s treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 election. The inquiry is being handled by him because the more appropriate committee chair, Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., made a mess of the previous impeachment efforts by mismanaging his hearings with Robert Mueller, John Dean, and Corey Lewandowski. In fact, the Mueller hearing was such a disaster for impeachment efforts that it more or less killed a multi-year effort put in place by Resistance bureaucrats and their supporters...  https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/05/real-talk-impeachment-is-going-poorly-for-democrats-and-the-media/  
.
Republicans consider putting Jordan, 
Meadows on Intelligence for impeachment
XMYAXd-JcRauSvuAE4Mjis6bJCkjXuYmaPKOifOR9OH_bJhJQkWVrFqWH_NaLL_wFgme8f6dceZ2HewRhC3xmInCq94Zcs-RCJShbP8CtNi_MbXo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By JULIEGRACE BRUFKE and OLIVIA BEAVERS
{ thehill.com } ~ Top House Republicans are considering temporarily placing two of President Trump's most ardent allies on the House Intelligence Committee... a move that would shore up Trump's defense on a key panel that will take a leading role in questioning witnesses during the public phase of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. The two Republicans — Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio), the top Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, and Oversight member Mark Meadows (N.C.) — would be added as Democrats seek to bring in witnesses who they believe can deliver the most damning testimony about President Trump’s contacts with Ukraine, according to two GOP sources familiar with the deliberations. The resolution Democrats recently passed laying out how they plan to conduct the public phase of the impeachment inquiry says members of the Intelligence Committee will be able to ask witnesses questions while those on the other two committees involved in impeachment — Oversight and Foreign Affairs — will not be allowed to do so. By moving Jordan and Meadows, both senior members of the House Freedom Caucus, Republicans will be able to get around this procedure. And both are viewed as being highly invested in the president’s defense. They frequently attend the closed-door depositions that Democrats have held over the past five or so weeks — even during a House recess week. And when they emerge, they have sought to undermine negative testimony from witnesses or tout testimony that they view as favorable in defending Trump against the claims that he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to open politically advantageous investigations. The irregular move — one produced by the irregular circumstances of an impeachment inquiry — would put two of Trump’s most vocal defenders in position to go head-to-head in televised hearings with House Intelligence Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and other Democrats who have claimed that Trump used nearly $400 million in financial aid as leverage to get Zelensky to commit to investigating interference in the 2016 election as well as former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden, one of the president’s top 2020 political rivals...   https://thehill.com/homenews/house/469077-republicans-consider-putting-jordan-on-intelligence-for-impeachment   
Mitch McConnell Wins In Kentucky
UkMIzU5QHG6jQ842X5s2W7wGwbbtCt0z5zYK-Rs67KzoNxuoUoUH-Dj6p_tZiVOVRoNH3n5PkvuTslc6vOlDvV8Pbct9AReyoZgKBO9M4G_zTa_wT_i4-L_1wv-35HnMPER8uNxZ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Sean Davis
{ thefederalist.com } ~ After all the money spent and all the trash-talking from the Left, it appears that Sen. Mitch McConnell has won his re-election bid in Kentucky... McConnell squared off against Alison Lundergan Grimes, a Democrat who is currently serving as the Secretary of State of Kentucky. Grimes was elected statewide in 2011 with over 60 percent of the vote. The Left poured tens of millions of dollars into the coal state in order to unseat the Republican minority leader in the Senate. For months it looked as though the race would be a squeaker, with McConnell holding a small lead in the polls. However, in the last couple of weeks the race broke open. The final Real Clear Politics poll average as of last night showed McConnell with a decisive lead of over seven percentage points.According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the two campaigns spent over $30 million this cycle. Outside groups not directly affiliated with either campaign spent tens of millions more. Eight groups spent more than a million dollars each to sway the election results. If the GOP takes control of the Senate, McConnell is expected to be elected as the Senate majority leader.  https://thefederalist.com/2014/11/04/mitch-mcconnell-wins-in-kentucky/  
.
Trump Offers Mexico Assistance 
in ‘Cleaning Out’ Drug Cartel ‘Monsters’
pwumFVIhhrDzRCPyk5itMdKuC6D6z4gPuuVsXeWgVIVmZQ9U6cl4grKIZE1BjTY_12BQEUgmIscVz7zo5Rk0ZWRjmK7lgJzf68ELBy-ZCE8fl40mYcyZb0xzWWui=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Mary Chastain
{ legalinsurrection.com } ~ A shootout in northern Mexico killed nine American citizens, including six children. Apparently, a drug cartel thought the SUVs belonged to a rival drug cartel... President Donald Trump declared the U.S. “stands ready, willing & able” to help Mexico eliminate “these monsters.” The victims resided “in the La Mora religious community in northern Mexico, a decades-old settlement in Sonora state founded as part of an offshoot of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints around 70 miles south of Douglas, Arizona.” The gunmen murdered three women and six children. The shootout left six children injured. Fox News reported it may not have been mistaken identity: Early reports indicated the tragedy could have been a case of mistaken identity, but recent history also raises the possibility the LeBaron family was the intended target: only a decade ago, two members of the family opposed to local drug trafficking groups were kidnapped and murdered, according to the New York Times. Mexico’s federal Department of Security and Citizens’ Protection said security forces were reinforced with National Guard, army and state police troops in the area following “the reports about disappearance and aggression against several people.” The troops were searching for the missing community members, believed to include 11 children or more. Trump responded this morning with an offer to help Mexico. Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador began his presidential administration by swearing the drug war over in Mexico. Unfortunately, the “murder rate has hit record highs this year.” People have said the president’s situation has notworked... https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/11/trump-offers-mexico-assistance-in-cleaning-out-drug-cartel-monsters/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=7a99de4c-548e-415e-ba09-60401b8a8684  
.
Mexico-Based Smuggler Trafficked Six People 
From Terrorist Hotbed Over U.S. Border 
Qr_XnmqdnwtkVb_66Km3RUkn50fcpjjofU-bZgm-njGh5jxLyqaUOkumoVkfEovB7PMiz8NxglojhvjlH4cEWQyRJFT-TF70eRV5MruaTkZhWSiNqW6CPNbutR_VFJlRaNuQ6WPHpZDBFoSehD4yjSu_N8gNsJtL7Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Todd Bensman
{ thefederalist.com } ~ Often lost in the discussion of hundreds of thousands of Central Americans pouring over the southern border is that migrants from Muslim-majority countries where Islamist terrorist groups operate arrive among them almost every day... The corporate media hates talking about this. But most border-crossers show up without any identification and little vetting, giving rise to U.S. national security efforts to stifle this human traffic for fear of terrorist infiltration, a threat about which I have written extensively. Every so often, smugglers of migrants from countries of national security concern — known in government parlance as “special interest aliens” — are caught and brought to American justice. Such was the case last week, when a federal judge in a Del Rio, Texas, courtroom empty of news reporters sentenced a Mexico-based Jordanian smuggler named Moayad Heider Mohammad Aldairi to three years in the federal penitentiary on a guilty plea. His case is interesting because it briefly illuminates a fascinating kind of American counterterrorism-immigration operation reporters must do acrobatic yoga to avoid covering. The Aldairi case also demonstrates why this exotic sort of human smuggling presents a national security threat to the homeland and has spawned James Bondian foreign efforts to take other Aldairis offline. Who Were the Yemenis Aldairi Smuggled? Before a complex, multinational Immigration and Customs Enforcement-Homeland Security Investigations dragnet snagged Aldairi last year at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, he ran a business that in 2017 smuggled over the Mexico-Texas border at least six Yemenis for whom he was charged. He likely brought in many more than that. That at least six unknown and unvetted Yemenis were smuggled over the Texas border from Mexico should be a recognizable problem on its face, although it’s often denied as perfectly innocent immigration that nativist right-wingers baselessly play up. Yemen is embroiled in a civil war in which one major armed faction, which controlled sizable chunks of territory, is al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Throughout the 2018 prosecution of Aldairi, U.S. prosecutors wouldn’t say whether any of the Yemenis that Aldairi smuggled through Latin America were part of al-Qaeda or their victims. But San Antonio Express-News reporter Guillermo Contreras reported this spring that “law enforcement sources” told the newspaper “some of the six Yemenis” that successfully crossed into Texas were on the U.S. terror watch list. Federal law enforcement sources with direct knowledge of the investigation have told me the same...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/06/mexico-based-smuggler-trafficked-six-people-from-terrorist-hotbed-over-u-s-border/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=7b2615b054-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-7b2615b054-83771801   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Want Better Schools? Parents, It's Up to You
_3-rJYU-cyWlGuNXd1cbMkk_ze4t6ff3H-Zbck25t9bDfiaPMEfFZFRmF50s1GS5RYoi7ZHmDMS5o_xQIPNtynaDQxTnLVpd82MU3lSsUwJaTRyrc0aeeiagAF0WYZk_gDjyXkLoIEysCojEUcXwqw1OtfYeSWafZPiQ3o0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith:  “To promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.” —U.S. Department of Education Mission Statement

Umm… Achievement and preparation via education excellence with equal access sounds terrific, but it’s not what’s happening after federal spending has been increased six fold since the U.S. Department of Education’s first budget in 1980.

Last week, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for 2019 — a.k.a. the “Nation’s Report Card” — was published. If you believe parents have a responsibility to be the First Teachers, the data will support your thoughts that too many are sending their children to America’s public schools for teachers to raise, not just educate. If you subscribe to the narrative that public schools are racist establishments that deny minorities access and are institutionally prejudiced, you’ll use data to support your thesis despite the trillions of dollars that have been spent on America’s urban core. In other words, the data might support any sort of dissection of the results, but let’s just boil it down in this sense: The proficiencies of children in public schools are embarrassingly low and will continue to be a true barrier to the success of generations to come.

Since 1980, Congress has appropriated spending for public education in excess of $1.5 trillion. According to the U.S. Department of Education’s website, the funding formula is 8% from the federal government and the rest from state and local sources. So, clearly, the funding of public schools is vast.

Exactly how embarrassing are the 2019 scores of America’s students? Looking at reading, children testing for proficiency taught in public schools were 34% at the fourth-grade level, 32% at the eighth-grade level and, at graduation, 36% in the twelfth-grade year. Yeah, that means around 65% of kids at all grade levels are below taught and expected capability in reading — a foundational skill needed throughout life.

In math, the respective numbers were 40%, 33%, and 23% at the same ascending grade levels, while science numbers were 37%, 33%, and 21% at the same times of assessment.

How do these numbers compare over the years? Since the mandate of Common Core — the federal required standards with money attached from the U.S. Government — a decline has been measured by consistent data. Scores for the lowest performers in the bottom 10% have fallen and the only improvements have been scored at the top 10% of students. Put simply, the gap is growing between those who achieve and those who struggle.

Despite almost 76% of teachers surveyed noting that they have changed “at least half of their classroom instruction” and another 19% responding that they’ve changed almost all of their teaching to fit the new mandates, it appears that attempts to create a one-size-fits-all curriculum has failed. The test scores have fallen for a third consecutive time since the 2015 implementation of Common Core. On the same day that Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos declared, “This country is in a student achievement crisis” based on the relatively small number of students proficient in academics, a second barometer of achievement validated the dismal results.

The Condition of College & Career Readiness report cited by Secretary DeVos that substantiated her concern looked at the performance of 1.78 million high-school graduates who took the National ACT test. “Readiness levels in English, reading, math, and science have all decreased since 2015, with English and math seeing the largest decline” across all races according to DeVos, with the only improvements among Asian-Americans.

So, for the Department of Education to meet its stated mission, real change must occur. Now, we’ll also stipulate that there is no provision for education in the Constitution. But in any case, leftists have a weaponized agenda to divide and pit one group against another rather than work toward a true solution.

A massive amount of money has been spent. While some argue that the funding has been inequitable, the data continues to support that targeted funded has been directed to problem classrooms, schools, and districts above and beyond that of regular appropriations for “average” schools. Put simply, the inequity in spending, one could argue, has been in favor of underperforming schools, not to reward those or to reinforce the behavior of those that excel. So, money doesn’t fix the problem.

Federally mandated standards have been attempted with significant strings attached to access this targeted funded. Again, the promised improvements just didn’t happen. Instead, as the recent NAEP demonstrates, kids already performing well continued to do so. The ACT report states, “This year’s ACT score data — as well as five-year trends — confirm that students with higher levels of academic preparation are maintaining or slightly improving their readiness, while students with lower levels of academic preparation are falling further behind.” Well, those sure-fired-standards helped those who would likely have performed with proficiency without them.

OK. So, what’s missing?

Rather than offer any editorial, let’s just look at another published report that was based on an extensive survey of almost 650,000 students commissioned by Congress — The Equality of Educational Opportunity. This data included both measurements of the quality and quantity of educational resources available as well as the achievement of those students — a measurement of performance and equitable access.

The conclusions of this report were deemed controversial because the narrative was shattered that a bureaucracy could guarantee a positive educational outcome. Among key findings of the publication that was renamed The Coleman Report, as required by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, variations in school quality as measured by classroom size, per pupil expenditure, the size of features such as a library, showed “little association with levels of educational attainment.” The 737-page report noted, according to a Johns Hopkins Magazine analysis, “The physical amenities of a school weren’t the most important factor in a child’s educational success, and neither was funding, which, it turned out, was relatively equal within regions.”

Get ready for haters and head explosions in 3-2-1… “All factors considered, the most important variable — in or out of school — in a child’s performance remains his family’s education background,” surmised the data in the original 1966 study. In 2016, a national gathering that included then-Secretary of Education John King reviewed the landmark research and presented The Coleman Report at 50: Its Legacy and Enduring Value noting, “The conclusion that family background is far more important than people realized has remained a solid empirical finding for 50 years, and Coleman and his colleagues were the first to show the power of that relationship. But that insight has not done enough to shape policy. Too many proposals for innovative educational reforms fail to recognize how important family is. Policymakers have dropped the ball on that insight.”

It’s not popular to hear, but if Americans want proficiency in their students, parents must be the First Teachers and commit to a lifetime of learning.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66534?mailing_id=4629&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4629&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Wednesday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Transgenderism, Child Abuse,
 and Medical Malpractice
RFqwlJw5T62zPhjUFyOaZ2yprjMw1-mFMYUy_juyQJB7d6GMu3h-aCZCZv2C4PSQJ5b2Aj_t8aEMpJSoeSJZvD6k0BHuF80mBCdvvPjLj_6__Lx_2qdOhgK0aw01vjPwZIkSqrjNrInC6I01Zu54tiBF9uge2w8duT89Kl8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Sidney Powell Responds
to Prosecution “Mistake”
LCxmwKDt-xeVbCL-jX_xGKoJo4zlJYQ_dTytARA7Bp3n_Lkr8E4D_PSpsuXnOK5AZuQtnVZrsLos5JOh4r8G2jnEOSUNGXPIFtEdcblX3uNAsWDKBv3rwDsFl7ys0lhfIKc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Michael Flynn’s attorney, Sidney Powell, appears on Fox Late Night to discuss the stunning letter from the DOJ that for the past two years they have attributed the wrong notes to the wrong FBI agent.   What a mess.
.
Trump-Ukraine House impeachment inquiry to 
start 'open hearings' Nov. 13,
scumbag-Schiff says
VN70qxhUpMgF5V1dTdPSJQLUsGRj3OJqF0IbZ3hCfrUAtFxv7hbmbUBrmmUG_ccmfMcxKK4B0jOkuptPJr4Qp1PS3P4gGDK94_pZQKI7OBLB1OAQAeT-wkfP5ehPrlPIRwsKpZHK55bl7SC8vfD_K83IxH3OrST0E_p9fvXNQis=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brooke Singman 
{ foxnews.com } ~ The House Intelligence Committee will hold its first open hearings next week as part of the formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump... featuring current and former officials with knowledge of the Ukraine controversy. “Next week, the House Intelligence Committee will hold its first open hearings as part of the impeachment inquiry,” Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., tweeted Wednesday. “On Wednesday, November 13, 2019, we will hear from William Taylor and George Kent,” scumbag-Schiff continued. “On Friday, November 15, 2019, we will hear from Marie Yovanovitch.”“More to come,” he added. The first public hearing will feature Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, who already testified behind closed doors before congressional investigators that the president pushed Ukraine to investigate election interference, former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden and their Ukrainian dealings—and that he was told U.S. military aid and a White House meeting were used as leverage to get a public announcement from Kiev that the probes were underway. Kent, the deputy assistant Secretary of State, also will appear with Taylor. Kent testified behind closed doors last month, and told the committees that he had concerns about Hunter Biden’s role on the board of Ukrainian natural gas firm, Burisma Holdings, in 2015, but was rebuffed by the former vice president’s staff, which said the office was preoccupied with Beau Biden’s cancer battle. Meanwhile, next Friday, Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, will appear in a public setting. She testified last month behind closed doors as well, telling lawmakers that Ukraine told her about Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s campaign to oust her from her post in the administration. Yovanovitch was pushed out of her job in May on Trump’s orders...  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-ukraine-house-impeachment-inquiry-to-start-open-hearings-nov-13-schiff-says  
.
Leading Democrats Call 
for Conditioning Military Aid to Israel
6Yc1znfJd8fgvdVfg9ykEWAvkf6GfVkMiJx0ZM6PdavEcqQJ16HaUABlE27eaYo1QGW3XlUeKNztwUWxe0SpRdTfoWj53ImXL5PYqCiVoHv5G_K4LgUGfZUknnICI4XciN1MiORNRw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Noah Pollak 
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Three leading Democratic presidential candidates recently endorsed a new policy regarding U.S. military aid to Israel... It should be conditioned on Israel embracing policies toward the Palestinians favored by American progressives. At the J Street conference last week, Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) demanded that Israel "fundamentally change" its approach to terrorist-controlled Gaza, adding, "I think it is fair to say that some U.S. military aid to Israel should go right now into humanitarian aid in Gaza." Israeli officials believe such moves would enable Hamas to import more weapons and lead to another war. South Bend, Ind., mayor Pete Buttigieg called for cutting aid if Israel annexes the West Bank, which Israel has no plans to do. Sen. Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren (D., Mass.) said military aid should be cut if Israel is "moving in the opposite direction" of the "two-state solution," which most progressives believe Israel is doing. None of the candidates announced demands on the Palestinians. The statements show the extent to which anti-Israel sentiment has spread from progressive activists to the Democratic Party mainstream. The calls for aid cuts are at odds with the longstanding strategic rationale for military aid to Israel, which has never been intended to promote peace with the Palestinians or the two-state solution.  U.S. aid largely takes the form of a credit that Israel must spend in the U.S. market, buying aircraft and arms from American defense companies, and long predates the concept of a two-state solution or peace process. It is concerned with promoting the broader U.S. interest in regional peace and security. From the 1940s through the 1973 Yom Kippur war, Israel fended for itself almost entirely without U.S. military aid. It was this absence of superpower backing that enticed Arab states to believe that small, vulnerable Israel could be defeated on the battlefield—that period was marked by state vs. state wars whose effects rippled outward from the Middle East and harmed the United States. These wars threatened to draw in Cold War rivals, and in 1973 the defeated Arab states imposed an oil embargo that damaged the U.S. economy...   https://freebeacon.com/national-security/leading-democrats-call-for-conditioning-military-aid-to-israel/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=728b563f52-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_05_10_02_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-728b563f52-45611665   
How Putin Outfoxed Trump, Pence and Erdogan
7wryJs20blEpXAZmAK81kEQCcIntX8MgXYiM1XMiPoCmKWHK4iuQ1lXIDzbp-jS7EMPe8KL1SPlVNSpi1wHx-f-DNQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Malcolm Lowe
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ On October 17, brandishing President Donald Trump's threat to destroy the Turkish economy, US Vice President Mike Pence visited Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan... Feigning a spirit of compromise, Erdogan agreed on a memorandum with Pence that effectively gave Erdogan the green light to complete his ethnic cleansing of the Syrian Kurds. On October 22, Erdogan went to visit Russian President Vladimir Putin. This time, Erdogan feigned full satisfaction with a joint memorandum that limited his ethnic cleansing to an Arab-majority stretch of Syrian territory adjacent to the Turkish border, where few Kurds live anyway, while conceding the protection of all other Syrian Kurds to Putin. Trump claimed the entire credit for this outcome. But in reality it was the culmination of a scheme that Putin had been planning since at least January 2019, when he promoted a meeting between representatives of the Syrian Kurds and of the Assad regime. In short, the two meetings ended with the US administration claiming its strategic wisdom precisely as it surrendered its former substantial influence in Syria and established Russian supremacy in Syria. Before we examine the details, however, a brief geography lesson is needed. The idea of building a Berlin-Baghdad Railway originated in the late nineteenth century when Syria and Iraq were parts of the Ottoman Empire. The project gained impetus from German-Turkish cooperation in the years leading up to World War I, when work began on various stretches of the route. Although the stretches were not all linked up until 1940, by World War I a stretch did run from Çobanbey in the west to Nusaybin the classical Nisibis in the east. After the war, Turkey was deprived of all its Arab territories. Most of the west-to-east border between the new Republic of Turkey and the French Mandate for Syria was determined to run along the Syrian side of that stretch of railway...
.
Russia Captures Advanced 
Israeli Missile Interceptor in Syria
0vut2q3Vuz0Ve2BED2SQFopJeuq5WhN-0dDkQ7moP_WOr3uBHgtviP0EaeF6cMrZBuoH2yZPNEQTDJ-nkH6gEl2sHbHpYq-KO6RAhQDoC3spkLoAuFUpzCdV=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By ALON EINHORN  
{ jpost.com } ~ An advanced Israeli surface-to-air missile that was fired from the David's Sling formerly known as the Magic Wand missile system was given to Russia by Syria... when it was found intact after the rocket did not explode on contact, according to Russian media sources. The rocket was reportedly fired on July 23, 2018, and Syrian forces that were dispatched to the scene found the missile intact after it sustained minor damage from impact. The missile was then taken to a Syrian-Russian base where it was transferred to Moscow for further research. David’s Sling was developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and American defense contractor Raytheon. The system is designed to intercept enemy planes, drones, medium-to long-range rockets and cruise missiles and the newest generation of tactical ballistic missiles at low altitude. The system forms the middle layer of air defense systems between the Iron Dome and the Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 missile defense systems. Russian media reports quoted Chinese news agency Sina saying that the missile was taken by Russia for “reverse engineering.”  https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Syria-hands-Russia-an-advanced-Israeli-missile-starts-researching-it-607009  
.
U.S. Imposes New Sanctions on Officials 
Tied to Iran’s Supreme Leader
by Tzvi Kahn
{ fdd.org } ~ The United States on Monday sanctioned Iran’s Armed Forces General Staff (AFGS) and nine individuals responsible for implementing the extremist policies... both at home and abroad – of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The new designations send a clear message that the Trump administration remains committed to imposing maximum pressure on Tehran to counter not only its aggression abroad but also its repression at home. The sanctions come on the 40th anniversary of the seizure by Iranian militants of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, where they took dozens of personnel hostage for 444 days. In a ceremony to mark the occasion, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo noted that Iran still continues to hold U.S. hostages today, underscoring the continuity of Iranian policy over the past four decades. Pompeo also announced a new $20 million reward for information leading to the return of former FBI agent Robert Levinson, who disappeared in Iran in 2007. The new sanctions target some of the bloodiest figures in the regime. Ebrahim Raisi, the head of Iran’s judiciary, played a key role in the 1988 massacre of thousands of political opponents, serving on a four-member “Death Commission” that presided over the execution of inmates at Evin Prison, Iran’s most notorious jail, as well as Gohardasht Prison. Today, as head of the judiciary, Raisi leads Iran’s kangaroo court system, which has executed, imprisoned, and tortured countless political prisoners. Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior advisor to Khamenei, was a mastermind of the 1994 suicide bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, which killed 85 people, including a five-year-old boy. Velayati served as Iran’s foreign minister at the time of the attack. In recent years, he has helped Tehran extend lines of credit to the regime in Syria, making him complicit in Bashar al-Assad’s atrocities. Brigadier General Hossein Dehghan, a military aide to Khamenei, served as the commander of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) forces in Syria and Lebanon in 1983 when Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy, bombed an American military compound in Beirut, killing 241 U.S. service members...   https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2019/11/05/us-imposes-new-sanctions-on-officials-tied-to-irans-supreme-leader/   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Transgenderism, Child Abuse, and Medical Malpractice
RFqwlJw5T62zPhjUFyOaZ2yprjMw1-mFMYUy_juyQJB7d6GMu3h-aCZCZv2C4PSQJ5b2Aj_t8aEMpJSoeSJZvD6k0BHuF80mBCdvvPjLj_6__Lx_2qdOhgK0aw01vjPwZIkSqrjNrInC6I01Zu54tiBF9uge2w8duT89Kl8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert:  “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” —attributed to George Orwell

Most Americans would be surprised to know the phrase, “first do no harm,” is not part of the Hippocratic Oath. It dates to a mid-19th century medical text, and is attributed to Dr. Thomas Sydenham, a 17th century English physician. They’d probably be even more surprised that while some medical schools ask their graduates to abide by the Oath, other schools use a different pledge — or no pledge at all.

What wouldn’t surprise Americans in the least? As columnist Melissa Bailey revealed in 2016, “Some medical school classes have revised their oaths to reflect their personal values.” She cites the oath used by incoming Harvard Medical students, which reads: “We promise to bear witness to historical injustices that continue to unfold for marginalized communities.”

This is no accident. In 2015, for the first time in nearly 25 years, the Association of American Medical Colleges — which is one-half of the only government-approved accrediting entity for U.S. medical schools — revised the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) in such a way as to fundamentally alter the way medical schools assess their applicants.

The leader of this change was Dr. Darrell Kirch, president and CEO of the AAMC. “Kirch often insists that social justice is the neglected core tenet of medical ethics; in a 2015 essay, he praised the White Coats for Black Lives movement, a medical-student organization inspired by Black Lives Matter, for ‘sparking dialogue rather than division’ by ‘staging on-campus die-ins,’” explains columnist Devorah Goldman. “White Coats for Black Lives lobbies, among other things, for the creation of ‘national medical school curricular standards’ that would mandate the teaching of ‘structural racism’ and ‘unconscious racial bias’ in medical schools.”

In an interview that same year, Kirch stated that his greater goal with regard to the MCAT was to test “not just what students know but how they think.”

Translation: medical decisions must now be informed by “woke” political considerations.

This nonsense has also infected the American Psychological Association (APA). For the first time ever, the APA determined this year that “traditional masculinity — marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression — is, on the whole, harmful.”

Thus, clinicians are advised to be aware of their own bias and face the reality that “power, privilege, and sexism work both by conferring benefits to men and by trapping them in narrow roles.”

What’s not harmful? The transgender agenda. In 2012, the organization removed the term “gender identity disorder” from its directory of mental illnesses, reclassifying it as “gender dysphoria.” Today, the Treatment section of the APA website recommends that gender dysphoria should be addressed by “counseling, cross-sex hormones, puberty suppression and gender reassignment surgery” — for adults.

What about children? Political waffling. “A child’s treatment typically involves a multi-disciplinary team of health care professionals, which may include a pediatrician, a psychiatrist, other mental health professionals, a pediatric endocrinologist (specialists in hormone conditions in children) and an advocate,” the APA website states. “Treatment may focus primarily on affirming psychological support, understanding feelings and coping with distress, and giving children a safe space to articulate their feelings. For many children the feelings do not continue into adolescence and adulthood.”

“Many” children? According to the American College of Pediatricians “as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.” Feelings? “No one is born with a gender,” the ACP asserts. “Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.”

It’s far worse than that. Gender has become a political  term. One so removed from biological and chromosomal reality that children in the UK are being taught there are more than one hundred “gender identities,” and The Royal College of General Practitioners recognizes six: male, female, “gender-neutral,” “nonbinary,” “gender-fluid,” and “gender-queer.”

All well and good save for one inconvenient reality: If one undergoes gender-reassignment surgery — arguably the most drastic capitulation to gender dysphoria — one gets only two choices: man or woman.

Sadly, “man and woman” now includes boy and girl. In the latest debacle, Austin, Texas, Judge Kim Cooks of the 255th district, who won an unopposed general election in 2018, has essentially remained agnostic regarding whether or not seven-year-old James Younger should undergo the chemical castration necessary to satisfy his physician mother’s wishes to turn him into a girl named “Luna” — despite the largely under-publicized reality that James has a twin brother named Jude.

Cooks issued joint custody to both Dr. Anne Georgulas and father Jeffrey Younger, who is desperate to prevent his son from getting puberty blockers. Cooks also issued a gag order to both parents so they cannot speak to the press about the case — meaning Younger’s “Save James” website will have to be shut down.

Ironically, Cooks is the voice of reason here. She overruled an 11-1 Dallas jury’s verdict that awarded sole custody of James to his mother.

James Younger is hardly an outlier in what amounts to a monstrous collaboration between a politically compromised medical community and ideologically addled parents. As the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) website reveals, doctors are also performing double mastectomies on healthy 13-year-old girls, even as it admits professional guidelines “lack clarity … because there are no data documenting the effect of chest surgery on minors.”

Puberty blockers? Although they are championed by the Endocrine Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food and Drug Administration isn’t on board due to the inconvenient reality that the agency has recorded more than 41,000 adverse events reported with their use between 2013 and June 30, 2019 — including 6,370 deaths.

How much more “woke” can the medical community get? As woke as society at large will let them, it seems. A society at large that apparently prefers avoiding accusations of bigotry to the point where it abides the teaching of the transgender agenda in elementary schools, “men” getting pregnant, biological males  dominating women’s sports — and what amounts to the mutilation of physically healthy children.
 “From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany carried out a campaign to ‘cleanse’ German society of individuals viewed as biological threats to the nation’s ‘health,’” the Holocaust Encyclopedia  recounts. “The Nazis enlisted the help of physicians and medically trained geneticists, psychiatrists, and anthropologists to develop racial health policies.”

In modern-day America, the Rainbow Mafia has enlisted the same cadre of professionals to develop gender-health policies. And much like their Nazi forebears, they will attempt to crush anyone who dares to defy their morally bankrupt agenda. Thus, calling the surgical and chemical transition of children the parental child abuse and medical malpractice it is truly has become a “revolutionary act.”

Let the revolution begin — in earnest.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66530?mailing_id=4629&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4629&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Wed/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
liar-Pelosi's Empty Warning to Her Party
_cc5F02rpIMgGIv1X9PePLqP8CZW9DQZdQOhUL_BedDj2y5tqOJVA1fme51MJvvQ0hZdywzDFIg2B6O3qvL80JSzcXOfL-A7j89Fzts5zT-veDedJMoofCYilSPe9t_tGVhSlA9ATetnzKUd0wyArvwRahMXVUlNImnQ-aQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Wednesday Top News Executive Summary
A-bcEe1TzXbWkFl8uMDV5Q_wEygJkZ1ko14tQA5tc-olia9io1_d2Psn15azzvTA4DwGxFbJ7vvdGNewAYu77cTjkMBjgfax1hjotNJZiIv13zetT1VThqiFoRE7EFLR7j8m3Io_tqMEELzMncxVIXOtWBWZEpfHp6c4efw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


ELECTION RESULTS: A strong night for Democrats in Kentucky and Virginia — the former due to that governor’s unpopularity and the the latter thanks to big money (NPR)

BOGUS “STANDARDS”: ABC News’s spiking of Epstein story draws scrutiny toward scumbag/liar-Clinton ally George Stephanopoulos (Fox News)

Government & Politics


CHIEF OF STAFF SOLICITED: House Democrats ask Mick Mulvaney to testify in impeachment inquiry (National Review)

UNITED WE STAND: Mitch McConnell says Senate trial “would not lead to a removal” of Trump if held today (USA Today)

Culture & Heartland


REPUBLICAN PREVAILS: Mississippi voters promote GOP Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves to governor (Townhall)

NO SANCTUARY: Tucson voters overwhelmingly reject sanctuary-city measure (Fox News)

DOUBLING DOWN: Texas voters approve constitutional amendment banning state income tax (KFYO)

ARBITERS OF PROPAGANDA: YouTube removes video of doctor discussing medical reality of transgenderism (The Federalist)

Other Notables


EXPANDED OPERATION: Trump OKs wider Syria oil mission, raising legal questions (Associated Press)

BACKFIRE: New Zealand’s gun confiscation shaping up to be a massive failure (Bearing Arms)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: It’s time for the U.S. to wage war on Mexican drug cartels (The Federalist)

POLICY: Staying in Paris climate agreement would have cost families $20K (The Daily Signal)

HUMOR: Jeffrey Epstein voted straight party ticket in yesterday’s election (Genesius Times)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/66618?mailing_id=4635&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4635&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
DOJ Makes Jaw-Dropping Admission in Flynn 
Case – Prosecution “Mistakenly” Attributed 
Wrong Notes to Wrong FBI Agents
9l2f8JXbkkWpIyHfzWaKMN71uYgw-vC6d58AXclY0f9lSdm5y7HqIMw9ayiP02H4GU2oEQbowgB3XrtMw49zbAWCiJiquHzoyyF_xM51gfOHcUYG=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT – Prosecutor Brandon Van Grack sends a letter to Flynn’s defense team today containing a stunning, almost impossible to comprehend... admission of a mistake central to the claims of the prosecution.  In March 2018 the FBI presented notes taken by agents Pientka and Strzok, now they say they made a ‘mistake’.For almost two years the DOJ misidentified, misattributed, and never corrected that the authors of the Flynn interview notes were actually reversed. All of the notes attributed to FBI Agent Peter Strzok actually were taken by FBI Agent Joseph Pientka, and vice-versa: What kind of f**kery is this? The DOJ never confirmed the authorship of the FBI notes that are central to the FD-302, upon which the entire prosecution claim of Flynn lying to investigators is based? …Seriously? The entire FBI case against Flynn; meaning the central element that he lied to FBI investigators he didn’t; is predicated on the FD-302 interview reports generated by the two FBI agents; later discovered to have been edited, shaped and approved by Andrew McCabe….  And for almost two years the entire outline of their documented evidence has been misattributed? C’mon man.  This is sketchy as heck. Obviously what triggered this re-review of the notes was a smart sur-surreply from the defense that highlighted how Peter Strzoks notes were far too neat, organized and well constructed to have been written during an actual interview...  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/05/doj-makes-jaw-dropping-admission-in-flynn-case-prosecution-mistakenly-attributed-wrong-notes-to-wrong-fbi-agents/  
.
Volker and Sondland Testimony Released 
And Elise Stefanik, Once Again, On the Right Trail
sHaxmiSUN3qss-c0bu03bcihXO40-ILg7o9KmbdstPNDGwkL46Rc1eyuRPqeKJa0sTKQaGfZiAtGCeQR1N33UnKvDP1wUj8RMkNhHWUYelDaNySMn7_dB3MHWXAlUu6sPoWZo7-Lb771RkrcbQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ The transcripts of the closed-door deposition of Kurt Volker and Gordon Sondland were released today by the Lawfare impeachment organizers and scumbag-Adam Schiff... Both pdf’s are below; however, first it is worth reestablishing a bigger, more important, context. In the fall of 2016, long before the term “spygate” reached the lexicon of political followers, CTH research discovered the background use and weaponization of the intelligence apparatus. This was before the November 2016 election. We didn’t exactly know who was involved, but we outlined what appeared to be a coordinated effort amid the intelligence community, current and former officials, politicians both parties, and media. Immediately after the November election, when CTH noted NSA Director Mike Rogers unscheduled visit to Trump Tower & the immediate moving of the Trump transition team, our review took on a more narrowed focus. It was at that point when CTH outlined a simplistic 30,000 ft. explanation ‘black hat’ and ‘white hat‘ ops. I regret those terms. In the year that followed, CTH was blasted for outlining what appeared to be a planned, organized, and very concerted effort within a network of DC interests, to conduct spy and surveillance operations against candidate Trump, president-elect Trump and President Trump. We were labeled conspiracy theorists by both sides of the political spectrum. We outlined how the Evelyn Farkas’ inadvertent admissions on MSNBC spoke to a coordinated effort that no-one was paying attention to. However, it wasn’t until March 20th, 2017, when scumbag-James Comey testified before the HPSCI and took an unanticipated series of questions from then freshman representative Elise Stefanik, and CTH outlined the specifics behind the admissions made by the FBI Director, that people started to realize what we had been saying for the past six months was indeed structurally evident...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/05/volker-and-sondland-testimony-released-and-elise-stefanik-once-again-on-the-right-trail/
.
Hunter Biden’s Ukraine gas firm pressed scumbag/liar-nObama administration to end corruption allegations, memos show
sV4SFCpTvBqcwNyKqvpbdsv2iIhDaX8w3Cy_b23d9YjT8rh-6pDd8yDwTUcuw1VlNiFrm74BJF7IkHI0fdqmUbUv6I35W_3-QkHv9Dsy79cgs5duix-ql8nNKivkoO61C_T79HiZhrgxM54lzs658Vhn=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by John Solomon
{ johnsolomonreports.com } ~ Hunter Biden and his Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple contacts with the scumbag/liar-nObama State Department during the 2016 election cycle... including one just a month before Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son’s company for corruption, newly released memos show. During that February 2016 contact, a U.S. representative for Burisma Holdings sought a meeting with Undersecretary of State Catherine A. Novelli to discuss ending the corruption allegations against the Ukrainian firm where Hunter Biden worked as a board member, according to memos obtained under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. I filed that suit this summer with the help of the public interest law firm the Southeastern Legal Foundation. Just three weeks before Burisma’s overture to State, Ukrainian authorities raided the home of the oligarch who owned the gas firm and employed Hunter Biden, a signal the long-running corruption probe was escalating in the middle of the U.S. presidential election. Hunter Biden’s name, in fact, was specifically invoked by the Burisma representative as a reason the State Department should help, according to a series of email exchanges among U.S. officials trying to arrange the meeting. The subject line for the email exchanges read simply “Burisma.” “Per our conversation, Karen Tramontano of Blue Star Strategies requested a meeting to discuss with U/S Novelli USG remarks alleging Burisma Ukrainian energy company of corruption,” a Feb. 24, 2016, email between State officials read. “She noted that two high profile U.S. citizens are affiliated with the company including Hunter Biden as a board member. “Tramontano would like to talk with U/S Novelli about getting a better understanding of how the U.S. came to the determination that the company is corrupt,” the email added. “According to Tramontano there is no evidence of corruption, has been no hearing or process, and evidence to the contrary has not been considered.” The question now is: Did any of those contacts prompt further action or have anything to do with loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s conduct in Ukraine in March 2016 when he forced Shokin’s firing?...
.
FBI’s Three Favorite Narrative Engineers Update Background Status of IG Report
rOspSZFgUJb6IeYw_ST2ii0wvsissURyUxVtvqcXVn0upcMaBpFPg0xS3uxoYa4_1bS75CrCN_LOaH6sHN1uNOMdtJLhk1c_xXgydNxyXaGGXRsmptrtosAm-fA2nmshAHc323GsiXDW1ZGfTO6o53e0OCJlEndu78UW0tzMuaKVEfR3CnEJw5cMFygj6_gvLeCYLfnQOrSc7JFQ_g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ When former FBI ‘small group’ members Andrew McCabe, James Baker, Mike Kortan, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were working on their political operation... to protect scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton and remove Donald Trump they had three specific journalists narrative engineers atop their speed dials.Texts, emails, and documents released over the past three years showed that whenever the small group wanted to leak they preferred: Devlin Barrett, Robert Costa and Matt Zapotosky at the Washington Post. So when we see Barrett, Costa and Zapotosky getting the gang back together to write about the upcoming IG report, it is worth reviewing their carefully engineered narrative. (Via Washington Post) Justice Department officials are trying to release in the coming weeks a potentially explosive inspector general report about the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s 2016 campaign, according to multiple people familiar with the effort. Interesting start to the expository: “trying to release“; the implication here is somewhat of an internal struggle between two opposing forces.  Those who are defending the deep state, and by extension the small group, and those attempting sunlight. Of course the customary anonymous disclaimer “people familiar with the effort”, relates to those inside the FBI/DOJ who are still working earnestly to carry on the corrupt endeavor. Unfortunately it is not a surprise that FBI Director Chris Wray and AG Bill Barr have no removed the career resistance operatives inside the institutions...
.
Willie Brown: Don't bet that impeachment 
will be a winner for Democrats
4SQIk714MU1rfHGADavlwhivVu5XaObfIeHcEFWYbyNOx8V6sRKyZaLrOak-G1LjW93-B_BjSTMgstxAUbNCKGqxCYOpEO2RenPXYo1sNDjfEW1Qu97V75uuW9TLR2V2oPfb_HoVtF9f656TYrVDmczv8CEMJqK5HywQtXwZbLSDgoA1N7OLVA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By JUSTINE COLEMAN
{ thehill.coms } ~  Former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown said in a new op-ed that people should not bet that impeachment will be a winner for Democrats... Brown, in a column in the San Francisco Chronicle, said that the House’s vote last Thursday to approve the impeachment inquiry process “solidified” President Trump’s “hold on power,” noting that all GOP representatives voted against the measure. He also said the Democrats’ effort resulted in “Mission Unaccomplished.” “There were zero GOP defections, meaning we have zero drama heading into the public phase of impeachment,” Brown wrote. “Everyone is pretty much in the same lanes they’ve been in since the Russian-collusion investigation, the obstruction of justice investigation and every other investigation.” The former mayor argued that most of the narrative surrounding the impeachment inquiry is already public, giving “people little reason to be glued to their screens” during upcoming public testimony. He also said people have made up their minds about Trump’s interactions with Ukraine's president. “So the Democrats will spend the next few precious months acting out a pretend cliffhanger to which everyone actually knows the script and the ending,” he wrote. “No plot twists in sight.” He also criticized House Democrats for abandoning the fight for affordable health care, the top issue for many of the party's voters in the 2018 midterms...   https://thehill.com/homenews/house/468755-willie-brown-dont-bet-that-impeachment-will-be-a-winner-for-democrats   
'Why is it OK for Republicans to do it?': Chris 
Wallace asks how closed-door Benghazi
hearings differ from impeachment process
fgSp_ztLHFlu1gM6w9iDfEPRsn51YoSW6QIq8VnMtOejuUm7ZlDAUthPbRYYkpZ3hr72sAElo28_On2znBdWGsZAz3s-9MO5FNuNbww5fnc40pR5Rep7eLUc3VDf8IsU4Wsi_Mk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Madison Dibble
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Fox News anchor Chris Wallace questioned White House counselor Kellyanne Conway’s objection to impeachment testimonies being conducted in private... President Trump and top Republicans have criticized House Democrats, especially House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, over the closed-door impeachment process. During a Sunday interview on Fox News Sunday, Wallace noted that much of the 2014 and 2015 House Benghazi hearings were conducted behind closed doors and that no Republicans were upset with that process. He pressed Conway to justify acceptance of a closed-door process for the Benghazi investigation but not for the impeachment hearings. “Why is it OK for Republicans, when they are in charge, to conduct hearings, depositions, interviews behind closed doors, but it's unacceptable for Democrats?” Wallace asked. Conway responded by highlighting the seriousness of impeaching a president, but Wallace pushed back, noting that four Americans died in the Benghazi attacks.“Wouldn’t you say that’s pretty important? Wouldn’t you say Benghazi was pretty important?” Wallace questioned. "So, why is it OK for Republicans to do it?" “The president of the United States has no due process right — he's had no due process rights afforded to him in this whole process,” Conway argued, later adding, “This is not the way that our rule of law, our system of justice, should work for the president or for anyone else.”The Benghazi hearings were an investigation into the State Department’s response to a 2012 attack on the American embassy in Benghazi, Libya, which left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time of the attack.
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-Pelosi's Empty Warning to Her Party
_cc5F02rpIMgGIv1X9PePLqP8CZW9DQZdQOhUL_BedDj2y5tqOJVA1fme51MJvvQ0hZdywzDFIg2B6O3qvL80JSzcXOfL-A7j89Fzts5zT-veDedJMoofCYilSPe9t_tGVhSlA9ATetnzKUd0wyArvwRahMXVUlNImnQ-aQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi has a message for Democrats: Rein in the unbridled run to the left. However, much like Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s hypocritical lecture on “cancel culture,” liar-Pelosi’s message rings hollow because of her sizable role in Democrats’ dramatic leftward shift.

“What works in San Francisco does not necessarily work in Michigan,” the San Francisco Democrat said. liar-Pelosi offered a rebuttal to “progressives” like commie-Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren hawking socialist policies, saying, “As a left-wing San Francisco liberal I can say to these people: ‘What are you thinking?’” She insists many in her party are “unhappy with me for not being a socialist.”

“Remember November,” she added. “You must win the Electoral College.”

A few thoughts. First, liar-Pelosi is the (arguably reluctant) leader of the impeachment coup attempt, a charade she attempted to legitimize with the veneer of guiding process rules — passed on a party-line vote. Impeaching a duly elected president over what amounts to general derangement over his victory is about as left-wing as it gets.

Second, liar-Pelosi perhaps realizes that Medicare for All isn’t popular with the overall American electorate, but she rammed scumbag/liar-nObamaCare through Congress on a party-line vote a decade ago. As we have long argued, scumbag/liar-nObamaCare was designed as a beachhead for single-payer government healthcare. That it took only a few years before Democrat presidential candidates were pushing for single-payer is, to the far Left, a feature of scumbag/liar-nObamaCare, not a bug. liar-Pelosi cannot claim ignorance of that strategy, however restrained she publicly claims to be.

The same goes for climate change. liar-Pelosi may deride “the green dream, or whatever they call it,” but her party insists “the science is settled” that humans are destroying the planet and drastic measures are needed.

Third, was her comment about the Electoral College what Leftmedia types would call a “dog whistle”? In other words, Democrats have been grumbling loudly about — and seeking to subvert — the Electoral College ever since Donald Trump lost the popular vote but won the presidency, as did George W. Bush in 2000. liar-Pelosi just gave them a subtle reminder of their frustrations.

Finally, if Democrats wish to be the center-left party, perhaps their leader shouldn’t be a self-described San Francisco liberal. liar-Pelosi may be more power broker than political ideologue, but she’s no moderate. Indeed, she is a big reason why her party has charged as hard and fast as possible toward socialism, so forgive us if we take the lectures on moderation with a big grain of salt.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66546?mailing_id=4629&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4629&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Wednesday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Half Century of Change
Keith%2BAcademy%2Breunion%2Bbadge.jpeg
Tom McLaughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump says 'proven liar' scumbag-Adam Schiff 
will alter impeachment witness transcripts
oAoRl1obGdPHkZiHDMhzY9dwOlODCHAPx6pRmK__osFIjW2ZQgvFr6TAwJSC2UuBhqittnPhlANJ960EF9gKm0MmvEwYIJSDd4rZVpcwpdwMcoDe9udz1t40TGl6Yz9rgD0DYXGV50E=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Daniel Chaitin
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ President Trump accused a top House Democrat of preparing to release "manipulated" transcripts of closed-door impeachment testimonies ahead of their expected release in the coming days... Trump took aim at House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, who has faced controversy for his handling of the impeachment effort, and called on Republicans to release their own transcripts. "If Shifty scumbag-Adam Schiff, who is a corrupt politician who fraudulently made up what I said on the 'call,' is allowed to release transcripts of the Never Trumpers & others that are & were interviewed, he will change the words that were said to suit the Dems purposes," Trump said in a tweet Sunday evening. The president suggested that Republicans "should give their own transcripts of the interviews to contrast with scumbag-Schiff’s manipulated propaganda. House Republicans must have nothing to do with scumbag-Shifty’s rendition of those interviews. He is a proven liar, leaker & freak who is really the one who should be impeached! "Trump's tweets come hours after Rep. Jackie Speier, a member of the intelligence panel, predicted the full transcripts from the closed-door hearings will become available "within the next five days." The California Democrat also said, "What we have heard is growing evidence of grounds for impeachment." scumbag-Schiff has taken flak for delivering a parody account of Trump’s summer phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which spurred the House Democrats' impeachment proceedings, during an opening statement at the only public impeachment hearing so far. Republican Florida Rep Matt Gaetz filed a complaint against scumbag-Schiff for the stunt...
.
Iran, Hezbollah Use Mexican 
Drug Cartels to Infiltrate US
87bttnFKuXFZfDZKiYtXFrJbyi52ZfyQlPdg711ucTNjprtk94kCU0WmuPstXIbdhrTX7YM2pplRNV1jqUai4T7e_6vKJhGGkHatxVWczdBJ77wxXJcIPLxFO0jDw18U4mLYarJGHkJ13ajWemBb7OveHqclv2ITwlF2xUdDVvANFnPRCZ_wfHXitZpxHSD41T8BcoZhTyGAHdvB4EIhWykfd-gfN9ggoJs3MTGRAFJfjggsEJw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Rami Dabbas
{ clarionproject.org } ~ Iran and its terror proxy Hezbollah are financing Mexican drug cartels, smuggling people into America and recruiting them for pay as sleeper jihadist cells... The recruits are mainly immigrants to Mexico from the Middle East, mostly from Lebanon where Hezbollah is based. The coordinated operation is part of Iran’s war on America. While Iran and Hezbollah are known to be active in the drug trade further south in Latin America, many are unaware that Iran, through its proxy Hezbollah, finances money laundering operations and human smuggling through the Mexican drug cartels at the U.S. border. The operation is founded on the known fact that the U.S.-Mexican border is easy to penetrate, with tens of thousands of illegal immigrants and asylum seekers from Mexico and other Latin American countries coming into the U.S. from Mexico every month. In southern Chiapas in Mexico, there are Muslim communities. These communities are made up of Syrians and Lebanese who migrated to Mexico decades ago as well as recent Mexican converts to Islam. In addition, Islam is gaining a foothold and in southern Mexico, with indigenous Mayans converting by the hundreds. These communities are funded in the Diaspora and all contain sleeper cells. With the help of Mexican drug cartels, they finance and traffic extremists to the United States. Canada has also become their target after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau  lifted the visa requirement for Mexican citizens. For example,  Ayman Juma, a Lebanese citizen linked to Mexican drug cartels and involved in the drug trade in Latin America and Mexico, is a member of the Hezbollah. He is also associated with al-Qaeda. Juma has smuggled tons of drugs from Mexico to the United States. The money made is partially used to fund terrorism, especially to prepare terrorist attacks against Israel as well as Hezbollah’s activities in America. Hezbollah also managed to smuggle 200 illegal Lebanese immigrants through Mexico to America. All of them are part of a network of Iranian and Hezbollah supporters...
.
‘Clear Public Safety Threat’: ICE Rips Sanctuary County for Releasing Illegal Alien 
Convicted for Deadly Crash
642ZFPTIXEKnvmkNLMBwWb_pS6GFd0H3Ogpl0GYmwLvI53tlXMgMbBLy53dwEJLq6o6_04q_RAE2dalbdXxQGZHdpy3HPwhyqaYD3E3OE_QFMTdTDKMAYhIZx0V1kbs4N9LG6WsA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jason Hopkins
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Officials in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, refused to honor an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer placed on an illegal alien convicted in a deadly drunk driving accident... opting instead to release him back into the community. ICE placed a detainer request on Jose Barajas-Diaz, a Mexican national living illegally in the U.S., a day after he was arrested in Charlotte, North Carolina, in January for driving while impaired and for felony death by motor vehicle. After his sentencing in October, however, the Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office refused to honor the ICE detainer, and released him from its custody. ICE agents were able to locate and apprehend Barajas-Diaz several days later. “This is yet another example of a clear public safety threat being released into North Carolina communities rather than into ICE custody due to local sheriff policies on ICE non-cooperation,” Matthew Albence, the acting director of ICE, said in a Monday statement provided to The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Continued decisions to refuse cooperation with ICE serve as an open invitation to aliens who commit criminal offenses that these counties are a safe haven for persons seeking to evade federal authorities, and residents of Mecklenburg County are less safe due to these misguided sanctuary policies,” Albence continued. Barajas-Diaz was first arrested on Jan. 29 by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department following an accident that killed a motorcyclist. He made a U-turn in his truck onto inbound lanes, striking the motorcyclist, and killing him on the scene, according to police. The Mexican national was charged with felony death by violence, operating without a license, driving while impaired, open container after consuming, and a safe movement violation...
.
AG to check alleged police wrongdoing 
in grilling of witness against Netanyahu
Mn-tCqaBA_UPVvLWTDwqBslxSNoo3vgMOMFY9rtrOPm18C__ZeY9J6LQC_qCDkbp507XHaq8kxDnON4JTifQ4HfZFAkOqpx3Rkf6wla_ojwVBSrhyeAaAr_EHACAegpkaNM1N2uD-qnyw25vog=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit on Tuesday vowed to look into possible wrongdoing by investigators in the cases involving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu... after a news report raised questions about police conduct during the questioning of a key state witness, as well as the veracity of his testimony. The head of the Israel Bar Association called for an immediate and open inquiry into the accusations, saying placing “a gag order upon suspicions without providing the public with an explanation” was “unthinkable.” He was apparently referring to some details of the affair being withheld. Channel 12 news on Monday shared transcripts of statements by Nir Hefetz, in which he spoke of trouble accurately remembering details of the case, changed his testimony on several occasions and mentioned meetings that apparently did not take place. Hefetz is a former Netanyahu spokesman and confidant and a witness in Case 4000 — the most severe of the cases facing the premier — in which Netanyahu is suspected of pushing regulatory decisions financially benefiting the controlling shareholder of the Bezeq telecommunications group, in return for ongoing positive news coverage. Hefetz turned state witness after being arrested and questioned over a two-week period, and is believed to have provided prosecutors with key information as an interlocutor between Netanyahu and Bezeq’s Shaul Elovitch...   https://www.timesofisrael.com/ag-to-check-alleged-police-wrongdoing-in-grilling-of-witness-against-netanyahu/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2019-11-05&utm_medium=email   
White Supremacist Arrested 
for Synagogue Bomb Plot in Colorado
yM9hiILgw1U6OHx3cGfnAKSOKGN9AQaDaER6Gg_c2YhWCPGxjclTJDhr3s2gMMnE81FzNcibAI1vGbkIuuTaNCffss28EGHbhHrVjiUqu83EMvFBUv_HuO9CkNS8_Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by clarionproject.org ~ A white supremacist was arrested  by the FBI for planning a synagogue bomb plot against the Temple Emanuel congregation in Pueblo, Colorado... He also was plotting to poison the synagogue’s water supply with arsenic. Richard Holzer, 27, was taken into custody by the FBI after examining inert explosive devices brought to him by undercover FBI agents. The FBI had been tracking Holzer since they found him talking about killing Jews and posting pictures of himself with weapons on white supremacist forums online. “I want something that tells them they are not welcome in this town. Better get the fuck out, otherwise, people will die,” Holzer said to the agents who he met with to discuss using Molotov cocktails to burn the synagogue down, according to an FBI affidavit. Holzer believed the agents would help him carry out the synagogue bomb plot. He sent them a video of himself at the synagogue looking for a place to place the bomb. The FBI originally made contact with Holzer through an undercover agent after discovering that he ran a number of white supremacist Facebook accounts. He reportedly introduced himself to the agents as a former Ku Klux Klan member and said he considers himself to be a white supremacist skinhead who supports sparking a “racial holy war.” Holzer also sent the agent a video of himself urinating on a Jewish center and suggested he was prepared to conduct a large-scale attack. In another video, Holzer put on a mask, picked up a machete and said, “May the gods be with me for what I must do.” When shown pictures of what he thought were pipe bombs, he responded with the Nazi slogan, “Sieg Heil! Hail Victory!”...  https://clarionproject.org/white-supremacist-arrested-for-synagogue-bomb-plot-in-colorado/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=ab7cc46a2b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_05_12_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-ab7cc46a2b-6442509&mc_cid=ab7cc46a2b&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5   
Play-nice approach of 2020 Democrats 
threatens to hand Trump a reelection advantage
VOu3PkWKw2yfrFYsYW85wkVzsr0Cqa5CtWqP6H6YUofdZJbDriFG1IeajoFFLhhSkyQDvAiqwBmfxzSK-GSbyNdNHxP6e-QNAs0R7hh7hfvM9kpZCHFBTxJuIfafZtwKtyd8Z0TKgmH9pFbpdU96JnRnateAS4VCNiZ6C3xrsAX0_D1YisXkictS2A31e8glbPpFQVZ-LSraK3LMMEXvrAT0tWSWG4VhmwqP4AcK0OZ8uP5g8DcGsEEKb82nvxL5fsr0dyQsNJ4_qbBUSYYdd69lkWziypwjOZepCfp1gQkON4Qst3ZMEPd6jjRX-HYlHNTD1NCkkGRsNxWngsfIIuC-He3PHN4UjvtGR9EJiaR1FrPkgdkl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Emily Larsen
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Democrats seeking their party's 2020 nomination have largely avoided bludgeoning each other with lines of attack that President Trump has already signaled he's ready to weaponize... That's likely to change soon. Whether overseas business activities of loose lips liar-Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden or Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren's self-proclaimed Native American heritage, vulnerabilities of top-tier 2020 Democrats are likely to become targets, with the first primary contests less than 100 days away. Rivals of former Vice President loose lips liar-Biden, 76, and Massachusetts Sen. dinky/liar-Warren, 70, will start to draw sharper personal contrasts rather than sticking solely to policy. “Everybody says, ‘We want to keep this clean, we want to keep it a positive campaign,’” said Democratic strategist Scott Ferson. “But then, as front lines emerge, they start getting targets on their back, and anything that has been talked about Hunter Biden, you know, Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren being a Northeastern elite, whatever it might be, I think it's all fair game." The eventual nominee will face an onslaught of attacks from Republicans and President Trump in the general election. Trump has already started to attack Hunter Biden's involvement with Ukrainian energy company Burisma while he was leading U.S. foreign policy toward the country. Vermont Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders, 78, suffered a heart attack, prompting arguments that he is too old to serve in office. Trump's favorite nickname for dinky/liar-Warren is "Pocahontas," a reference to her claim of Native American ancestry. "If dinky/liar-Warren thinks her Native American problem has been put to bed, she's got another thing coming,” said Ford O’Connell, a Republican strategist. “It is without a doubt going to resurface." dinky/liar-Warren’s rivals so far have stuck to criticizing her sweeping policy proposals, such as a “Medicare for all” government-financed healthcare plan that would make virtually all private insurance illegal. They've avoided raising questions about her claims of Native American ancestry, which she attempted to end by releasing a DNA test showing at least one Native American ancestor six to 10 generations back...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Half Century of Change
Keith%2BAcademy%2Breunion%2Bbadge.jpeg
 
Tom McLaughlin
{ tommclaughlin.blogspot.com} ~ There were a hundred guys in my high school class. At the 50th reunion last Saturday, I learned that a third of them are dead. Keith Academy was a private, Catholic prep school for boys in Lowell, Massachusetts that closed in 1970. Also at the reunion were survivors of a similar-sized class from Keith Hall, the Catholic prep school for girls across town. They, however, had lost only eight. On a screen, reunion organizers from both schools displayed graduation pictures of the men first, one at a time. I recognized them all and wondered what killed them, but I’d been in Maine for forty-two years and out of touch with all those people.
300px-LOWELLJAILHOUSE.jpg
Keith Academy  
A former classmate looked me up and left a voicemail with a pronounced Boston accent months ago but I was ambivalent about going. I sent in the $50 to keep my options open and put the date in the calendar on my smartphone. My parents sent me to Keith Academy but I had wanted to go to Tewksbury High with my childhood friends. For four years I felt out of place there.  
Unknown-1.jpeg
This had been a small ranch. It has quadrupled  
I drove down early so I could visit the Tewksbury, Massachusetts neighborhood in which I had grown up. The dead-end street I remembered with thirty small capes and ranches on quarter-acre lots, seemed shorter. I’d walked up and down it thousands of times during my childhood — to the bus stop and back every day, then again on my afternoon paper route. Almost every house had doubled in size although there were far fewer children living in them.  
TMC_5997.jpeg
At least the woods were pretty much the same  
It was a sunny, Saturday afternoon in November. Sixty years ago there would have been a sandlot football game going on and dozens of other kids would be engaged in various playful activities on the street, but all I saw last weekend were two mothers teaching their toddlers to ride tricycles. No other children were visible.  
TMC_5999.jpeg
Our old house  
Not knowing who lived in our old house, I drove past it to the end of the street and parked. What I really wanted to check out were the nearby woods where I had spent most of my boyhood. About a dozen houses occupied what had been part of the old woods, but most of the white pine forest was still there. In the deepest part of it, I startled two boys beside a small campfire. About eleven or twelve, they reminded me of myself and my best friend Philip when we habituated the area. We chatted a while before I hiked back to my car.  
Unknown.jpeg
St. William's School  
Then I drove to St. William’s, my old elementary school about a mile and a half away, now also closed. I remembered the sandlot baseball games we played behind it but that field was gone. I looked at the entry door where we lined up to go back inside after recess. I could almost see the girls in one line and boys in the other, all of us dressed in our school uniforms with a nun supervising. I looked up at the classroom windows where I attended 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. Some of my classmates at St. William’s went on to Keith Academy as I did, and Keith Hall too, but I didn’t see any of them at the reunion later that evening. That disappointed me.  
2xx44i.jpg
At 68 now, I wear glasses and use hearing aids. There were over a hundred people in the hall at Lowell’s Mt. Pleasant Golf Club, all talking at once and the acoustics were terrible, especially for me with my hearing impairment. A DJ played sixties music much too loudly for my liking. Not only was it difficult to understand what people were saying, but I also made myself hoarse trying to talk over the din. Twice I walked over and asked him to lower the volume until after dinner when people would start dancing. He did but turned it back up minutes later.
pprestricts.jpg
After dinner I found myself standing next to another former classmate from out of town and told him I live in Maine now. He said he had flown in from Washington, DC and I asked how he happened to move there. He said he’d started working for a Democrat political consulting firm in Boston which led to fundraising for the ACLU and Planned Parenthood in Washington. I almost said that put us at polar opposite ends of the political spectrum and then thought: “Nah.” I get enough of that with my column and Left & Right TV Show.  
41zqZwXZ-WL._SX325_BO1%252C204%252C203%252C200_.jpg
At about 9 pm I concluded that my effort to enjoy myself was unsuccessful and Michael Connelly’s newest novel was on the nightstand in my hotel room. I found my jacket and went out the door. I doubt anyone missed me. 
  
Read more…

Tuesday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
liar-Pelosi's Halloween Trick
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ex-envoy denied Trump linked Ukraine meeting 
to push for investigations, transcripts show
Svl2OU76f-A0vqXHoPdclZ4hchClf0DnY6iSoyG92Gy7NfF5weuNeI6tgydl1F3RTVNxu5_22dHI99zNxvbicyaOsfyNX7XeXFmy34rgAXH4wEx2_9vnHMwAOVYMmL7jsqaIKaP_xtVZ4-HOBNyHN7j0PpxTFL59ee4JHRkbKbARDG0o4Ja_xd_ohPZIYcfx3DO0H0GmBP5x1H7jeBaBB8Hgrg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Adam Shaw and Brooke Singman  
{ foxnews.com } ~ Former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, according to transcripts released Tuesday... pushed back on the claim that President Trump sought to withhold a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky until Kiev committed to investigate allegations concerning the 2016 election -- while also denying that Trump was seeking “dirt” on former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden. In a transcript of his closed-door deposition last month with lawmakers conducting the impeachment probe, Volker was asked if Trump withheld or delayed a meeting with Zelensky absent a pledge to probe concerns Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. “The answer to the question is no, if you want a yes-or-no answer. But the reason the answer is no is we did have difficulty scheduling a meeting, but there was no linkage like that,” he said. Recently revealed text messages showed Volker appearing to link the investigations to a D.C. visit by Zelensky. The deposition transcript seems to reflect Volker asserting the contrary. House Democrats have established an impeachment inquiry to investigate the circumstances surrounding President Trump’s July 25 call with Zelensky, in which he urged him to “look into” allegations surrounding the 2016 election and the loose3 lips liar-Biden family’s activities in the country. Democrats have alleged that a quid pro quo took place, with Trump leveraging military aid until the Ukrainians investigated the claims. Trump and Zelensky have claimed that no pressure was placed on them. However, acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor recently testified that the White House was willing to hold up both military aid and a prospective White House meeting to extract a public announcement from the country that probes were underway...   https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-envoy-trump-ukraine-transcripts  
.
Witch Hunt: Gregg Jarrett Scores Again
Fftv_YdBtILJUgwJfImIyGbNNe3BFFa62LiqStNmg8zagv-0wSbHWctlfWWi_sWq8KGfwHHrT83V6KhcByo5WmmbASEQOTemedQakYn_ySwZ6d6PYkkJk2-9CtNPFaMFej4dSQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
 by JEFFREY LORD
spectator.org } ~ Fox News legal and political analyst Gregg Jarrett has written Witch Hunt: The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History... a second blockbuster bestseller on what he calls — correctly — the “dirtiest trick in political history.” His previous book, The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump, has effectively served as an encyclopedia of one of the biggest scandals in American history. Over here in last weekend’s Wall Street Journal is a column by Trump non-fan Holman W. Jenkins Jr. Writing about the impeachment spectacle, Jenkins says that a central problem in all this is the “Democrats’ and the media’s astonishing and studied obliviousness to the bonfire they made of their own credibility with the Russia hoax.” Exactly. With precision and in detail, Jarrett lasers in on the specifics of this witch hunt. Right off the bat, Jarrett gets to something that is at the very core of not only this get-Trump witch hunt but that also poses a serious threat to democracy in the American republic. He says, The peril to democracy today is not a foreign force but a malignant force of unelected officials here at home. Armed with immense power and often lurking in the shadows, they have revealed themselves capable of uncommon corruption. Their allegiance is not to the Constitution and the rule of law but to themselves. Personal animus and a voracious appetite for authority are what motivates their zeal. Anyone like Trump, who might jeopardize their hold on power, must be immobilized by any means and at any cost. To neutralize this threat and achieve their desired ambitions, they politicized their agencies, weaponized law enforcement, and persecuted people without respect for law or process. That is exactly what is unfolding this minute with the impeachment “whistleblower.” As RealClearInvestigations’ Paul Sperry has reported on him, he is a registered Democrat held over from the scumbag/liar-nObama White House, previously worked with former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden and former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. In other words, this “whistleblower” is yet another! quite vivid example of Jarrett’s description of the “malignant force of unelected officials” who have conjured this witch hunt in the first place...  https://spectator.org/witch-hunt-gregg-jarrett-scores-again/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=769aa4af00-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_05_02_29&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-769aa4af00-104608113  
.
Where Are the 'High Crimes'?
rk4UiiFteoECnJniSjpNKia1NsjxhEVEFLq-tgz-sx2F1b_QKat5irSSMGuZNNETC3YFyr11vY4AD8YKIEt-MdYgybN5eEFOblPZ8N-kb_RF2zhkPLqUjj5N0D44pxP9-6QW5-hUyFltjCXYGg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Pat Buchanan
{ townhall.com } ~ "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." These are the offenses designated in the Constitution for which presidents may be impeached and removed from office... Which of these did Trump commit? According to his accusers in this city, his crime is as follows: The president imperiled our "national security" by delaying, for his own reasons, a transfer of lethal aid and Javelin missiles to Ukraine -- the very weapons President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama refused to send to Ukraine, lest they widen and lengthen the war in the Donbass. Now, if Trump imperiled national security by delaying the transfer of the weapons, was not scumbag/liar-nObama guilty of a greater crime against our national security by denying the weapons to Ukraine altogether? The essence of Trump's crime, it is said, was that he demanded a quid pro quo. He passed word to incoming President Volodymyr Zelensky that if he did not hold a press conference to announce an investigation of loose lips liar-Joe Biden and son Hunter, he, Zelensky, would not get the arms we had promised, nor the Oval Office meeting that Zelensky requested. Again, where is the body of the crime? Did Zelensky hold the press conference Trump demanded? No. Did Zelensky announce Ukraine was investigating the loose lips liar-Bidens? No. Did Zelensky get the Oval Office meeting? Yes. Did Zelensky get the U.S. weapons? Yes, $400 million in arms and Javelin missiles. Where then is the crime? When was it consummated? Or was this a thought crime, a bluff to get Zelensky to look into how Hunter Biden got a $50,000-a-month seat on the board of the most corrupt company in Ukraine, days after loose lips liar-Joe Biden was in Kyiv threatening to block a $1 billion loan guarantee to the regime. By the way, what was loose lips liar-Biden doing approving a $1 billion loan guarantee to Petro Poroshenko's regime, which was so corrupt that it ferociously fought not to fire a prosecutor whose dismissal all of Europe was demanding?...  https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2019/11/05/where-are-the-high-crimes-n2555883?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=11/05/2019&bcid=7220442bc3498cb5e2d68f3cb4d11680&recip=18305623   
Turkey, Whose President Fetes Hamas, 
Complains About US Terror Report
QGtsYmmOcp5koOO7eftQfdN1ckx4q52DhViabqlkvsEKt_PsDxaeDV180Y6reDwzpuxSny_2qV2cSLiiCH4bcStllCGj_RLkfLWM2mHCwatdZsrpUNvvGf_IM4R2e6cDvGjEyUzOqg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Patrick Goodenough
{ cnsnews.com } ~ Turkey’s Islamist government is unhappy that the State Department’s latest terrorism report does not adequately align with its views on two key security issues... Syrian Kurdish fighters and a U.S.-based Turkish cleric whom Ankara accuses of masterminding a failed coup attempt. Differences over the two issues have roiled relations between the two NATO allies for several years but the publication of the report has refocused attention on them, days before President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is scheduled to visit the White House. Turkey’s foreign ministry at the weekend accused the U.S. of being duplicitous about its stance on both issues. Ironically, Turkey accuses the U.S. of cooperating with “terrorists” even as its government and president continue to support Hamas, the U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization that rules the Gaza Strip. Both Turkey and the U.S. consider the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has waged a four-decade armed separatist campaign against the Turkish state, to be a terrorist group. But the U.S. does not extend that assessment to its Syria-based affiliate, the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), a close and effective ally in the successful campaign to defeat ISIS in Syria. Turkey’s recent military offensive in northeastern Syria was designed to push back the YPG from territory near its border, where it wants to resettle millions of Syrians displaced during the civil war and currently housed in Turkey...  https://www.cnsnews.com/article/international/patrick-goodenough/turkey-whose-president-fetes-hamas-complains-about-us   
Welcome to ‘Hotel California’
_2Y-qwQvDohuqjenKpdnvkrN2CGSfizMDSiq8QmS4ylpsVg6o6uw1lpXwhrHOX19GciM_6HOYAHXxuuefvNQz5qfk-9z7ri5D38eLO8Baq5EfsSN10TBAo9zg1G3GeHOfxQkJ88XMQvzRoj53mK4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by PATRICIA MAHON
{ spectator.org } ~ When I was a kid growing up in New York, California beckoned as an idyllic place of beaches, wine, wildflowers, and beautiful people. It was the land of “good vibrations,” “surfer girls,” and little “deuce coupes.”... I distinctly recall watching the Rose Parade from a cold couch in the winter of 1978, wondering where on Earth they had gotten all those flowers. Years later, after driving cross country in my 1992 Suzuki Samurai, I sat atop a sand dune in Malibu and thought I had reached paradise. I took in the natural wonders of California like air: Yosemite, Joshua Tree, Redwood Park, Death Valley, Half Dome, Monterey, Napa, China Beach. On a dark desert highway, cool wind in my hair. Warm smell of colitas rising up through the air* There are parts of the Pacific Coast Highway that routinely move me to tears, particularly at sunset, when the evening tide bathes the beach heads in a brilliant palette of pink and vermillion. This is a place of astonishing beauty, but I’ve come to realize that it is also “a terrible beauty,” to quote W. B. Yeats. Up ahead in the distance, I saw a shimmering light.  My head grew heavy and my sight grew dim. I had to stop for the night.  After more than 20 years here, the landscape has changed. Rarely does a day pass when I do not encounter the genderless homeless and their dogs encamped at a traffic signal or in the littered brush at the edge of a parking lot. Errant shopping carts routinely make their way from local markets to freeway underpasses, where they function as the support columns for an endless tract of tent homes. Sleeping bags, plastic bags, poly tarps, and cardboard are the cooperative building materials of the street. With a burgeoning homeless population of some 50,000, Los Angeles now boasts one of the largest unsheltered communities in the United States. It is a rough group of heroin addicts, prostitutes, the mentally ill, and folks who are simply down and out in Tinseltown...   https://spectator.org/welcome-to-hotel-california/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=769aa4af00-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_05_02_29&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-769aa4af00-104608113   
U.S. House Democrats to 
Continue Probe After Boeing Testimony
NapXHo99w77uFTEo2XqibRvfqsVgs9XKmQ0WTEhB1yNRdcQtbZ0n3xPahJn9tray12kgYvYvzxJAWBK95WqQIpHRNamNrcLTIvs3f2_Kk0cx9_qVvpcPP_GpOfMcEno4fN_vGiYfqvrOpEZYGeYigw3ODqVxmNk0x004jABOU9EklvvFioMnq7hMQtDcBOyGHbN0K3qRl0FhEswZGemeDZjmzsb4UCjauT0KlP9QsHiaG5T_yRuXKAnlsQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by ijr.com ~ The chairman of the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the head of its aviation subcommittee said on Monday... that it will continue its investigation into two fatal 737 MAX crashes after Boeing’s testimony prompted new questions. Representatives Peter DeFazio and Rick Larsen said in a joint letter to fellow lawmakers that Boeing Co Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg’s answers at Wednesday’s hearing “were consistent with a culture of concealment and opaqueness and reflected the immense pressure exerted on Boeing employees during the development and production of the 737 MAX.” The letter said the victims’ loved ones “deserve a thorough investigation from our Committee about how the regulatory system and the law failed, and that’s exactly what our committee intends to do.” Boeing spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Monday the company “will continue to cooperate with the committee.” The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) declined to comment. Muilenburg and Boeing Commercial Airplanes Chief Engineer John Hamilton’s testimony prompted “a litany of new questions for both Boeing and the FAA about the failures that led to the tragic and unnecessary deaths of 346 innocent people.” The committee released documents about Boeing’s decisions during the development of the MAX and a key safety system known as MCAS that led to the two fatal crashes and the plane’s grounding in March...  https://ijr.com/house-democrats-continue-probe-boeing/   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-Pelosi's Halloween Trick
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
 

Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives served up a nasty trick on the American people this Halloween by voting 232 to 196 to impeach you. No, that’s not a typo. This is not about impeaching just Donald Trump. It’s about impeaching you too.

Bitter progressives are trying to impeach the 63 million Americans who had the audacity to spit in the eye of America’s two political dynasties, who wanted to drain the swamp, who wanted to stop their jobs from going overseas, and who want to make America great again.

It was a vote to impeach the pro-life regulations this president has put into place. It was a vote to impeach the executive orders he has issued defending religious liberty. 

And keep in mind that the progressives going after Trump today have vowed to go after his judges too!

By the way, two Democrats voted against the impeachment resolution and no Republicans supported it. So the only bipartisan aspect about impeachment is the opposition to it.

Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) slammed liar-Pelosi’s hyper-partisan impeachment effort, saying, “At the end of the day, we’ll have the same president and same candidate  and a failed impeachment process, and the only difference would be that the president will have been exonerated of charges” by the Senate. He’s right.

Sadly, the Democrat majority in the House is wasting valuable time on meaningless investigations and political recriminations, further dividing the country.

There is only one solution, my friends. 

We MUST reelect President Trump, Vice President Pence, the Republican Senate and take back the House of Representatives. 

The only thing that will break the fever that now grips the unhinged left is a crushing defeat at the ballot box!

The White House Responds

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham released the following statement immediately following yesterday’s vote:

The President has done nothing wrong, and the Democrats know it. liar-Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats’ unhinged obsession with this illegitimate impeachment proceeding does not hurt President Trump; it hurts the American people.

Instead of focusing on pressing issues that impact real families, like reducing gun violence, passing the USMCA, improving healthcare, lowering prescription drug costs, securing our southern border, and modernizing our aging infrastructure, the Democrats are choosing every day to waste time on a sham impeachment — a blatantly partisan attempt to destroy the President.

With today’s vote, Speaker liar-Pelosi and the Democrats have done nothing more than enshrine unacceptable violations of due process into House rules. Speaker liar-Pelosi, Chairman scumbag-Schiff and the Democrats conducted secret, behind-closed-door meetings, blocked the Administration from participating, and have now voted to authorize a second round of hearings that still fails to provide any due process whatsoever to the Administration.

The Democrats want to render a verdict without giving the Administration a chance to mount a defense. That is unfair, unconstitutional, and fundamentally un-American.

We Just Filed Ethics Complaint

I joined 40 other conservative leaders in filing a formal ethics complaint against Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi for her conduct in this impeachment charade. 

The complaint alleges that liar-Pelosi ignored efforts by the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and then-Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden to strong-arm Ukraine into firing a prosecutor or risk losing U.S. aid. 

It also accuses liar-Pelosi of weaponizing the impeachment process by launching an illegitimate inquiry weeks ago without formal authorization by the full House.

Deep State Leaker Named

Investigative journalist Paul Sperry has a compelling column naming Eric Ciaramella as the so-called “whistleblower” who filed the initial complaint objecting to the president’s call with the Ukrainian leader. 

According to Sperry, Ciaramella worked closely with then-Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden at the White House and for former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan. He left his White House post and returned to the CIA in mid-2017 “amid concerns about negative leaks to the media.”

Sperry also reports that Ciaramella had invited Alexandra Chalupa to the White House for several meetings. You may be hearing a lot more about her in the future.

Chalupa is the Democrat operative who was dispatched to Ukraine to dig up dirt on Donald Trump on behalf of the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign. It was her efforts that led to this January 2017 Politico report: “Ukrainian Efforts To Sabotage Trump Backfire. Kiev Officials Scrambling To Make Amends After Quietly Working To Boost scumbag/liar-Clinton.”

Again, I must ask why it is okay for the left to invite foreign interference in the election for its political benefit, but Trump gets impeached for merely asking questions? 

This would seem like a good issue for the Senate Intelligence Committee to delve into. Don’t you agree, Chairman Burr?

No Mr. Nice Guy

The Trump campaign made a big splash during Wednesday night’s final World Series game. It ran an ad that even scumbag/liar-Obama campaign manager David Plouffe called “unprecedented” and “quite strong.”

The ad highlights President Trump’s accomplishments, including obliterating ISIS and killing Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and blasts congressional Democrats for wasting time on phony investigations and impeachment.

It’s a great ad! Watch it here. And share it on social media.

loose lips liar-Biden Denied Communion

loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s recent campaign swing through South Carolina is making headlines and not for the reasons he wanted. I told you earlier about loose lips liar-Biden’s absurd comment accusing law-enforcement officers of being bigots. The other “big news” was that he was denied communion at Saint Anthony Catholic Church in Florence. 

I have heard from good people, both Catholic and Protestant, who object to loose lips liar-Biden being denied communion. If Catholic or Protestant churches start denying communion to sinners, then no one in the congregation could take communion. 

But that’s not what happened. As Father Robert Morey explained, “Any public figure who advocates for abortion places himself or herself outside of Church teaching.” Father Morey promised to pray for loose lips liar-Biden, as we all should.

Just to be clear, loose lips liar-Biden was denied communion because he is actively promoting the sin of abortion, including late-term abortion. He is on the record in favor of forcing every Christian in America to pay for abortions. 

That’s not denying communion because he’s a sinner. That’s denying communion because he is a mouthpiece for an industry built on sin and that wants to destroy as many babies as possible who are made in the image of God.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66482?mailing_id=4625&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4625&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Tuesday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
ABA Trashes Another Judicial Nominee
Q97Y8X3y8V-XfsxXiekMctod7cJZoWeAN128p6X8L3CYvDKaRI_DR2gnWWmO-pgMivd5llA7c5q7-iMnfvky92GyhH6W3JktA-FURudveVkF_uvB-KnhL1oqVj4_qtcOb8MPe4njzToKQztUK62B44mb2PImOi6RDulpWqE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Political Editors  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
GOP leadership considers moving Jim Jordan 
for scumbag-Schiff impeachment fight
DC98cUPwpfy2sRx2OI4M2FqWHudI_fWoIoblV_AsJLsFQtn7QBiN7RWXCVcF4MYNnMX0bSRuyLve9anMkIzEFfrrpjMoMk9SC0h2O1seUZ8yfnaRfA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Frieda Powers
{ bizpacreview.com } ~ Rep. Jim Jordan may soon find himself on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence... The Ohio Republican could temporarily be assigned to the panel as a strategic move by House GOP leadership ahead of impending public hearings in the impeachment inquiry of President Trump, CBS News reported.  Top House Republicans have been having “active and serious” discussions about adding Jordan, who is currently the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, to the Intelligence Committee, a senior Republican source told CBS News. Jordan is considered a strong defender of the president and a great choice to counter Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is leading the impeachment inquiry as chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Republican questioning of witnesses in the closed-door depositions has been largely led by Jordan’s chief investigative counsel on the House Oversight Committee, Steve Castor. Jordan has effectively been leading GOP efforts in the impeachment proceedings so far where three committees have held closed-door hearings. A fierce critic of scumbag-Schiff and Democrats running the  impeachment proceedings, Jordan would be blocked from participating in any public hearings the Intelligence Committee will soon be conducting due to the House resolution passed last week. Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy reserves discretion in making Intelligence Committee assignments but would have to move another member out in order to make a spot for Jordan. The change could appear as a lack of confidence in GOP ranking member of the Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes, the California congressman who has not played a more visibly prominent role in the proceedings so far...   https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/11/05/gop-leadership-considers-moving-jim-jordan-for-schiff-impeachment-fight-848526?utm_campaign=bizpac&utm_content=Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Get+Response&utm_term=EMAIL   
Trump calls for 'war' against Mexican drug
cartel 'monsters' after Americans murdered
8GQJOGwYbKUk4pW-VSRB3R7EsJUyqSFGzLMv6CZ2FencCFALln4e8enbqwzkMYsEBYzGQ0lgu8YFC4TRNZrAi0Cu4cDLoSGqznMC0bdZxDvxTJcTn0EiNlnx2JLGmIuO1lU-UF_JJWpGR4740zlGOa-KwRXCbuuVb_iXERdR0hQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Adam Shaw 
{ foxnews.com } ~ President Trump on Tuesday offered U.S. assistance as he called on Mexico to “wage war” against the country's murderous drug cartel “monsters”... in response to the brutal killing of multiple Americans a day earlier. “If Mexico needs or requests help in cleaning out these monsters, the United States stands ready, willing & able to get involved and do the job quickly and effectively,” Trump tweeted. “The great new President of Mexico has made this a big issue, but the cartels have become so large and powerful that you sometimes need an army to defeat an army!” Officials say at least six children and three women, apparently all U.S. citizens living in a community of Americans in Mexico, were gunned down after their convoy came under fire during a daylight ambush Monday. Six children were found alive, five of whom have been taken to hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. One child is currently missing, and authorities are searching the mountainous area on the Sonora-Chihuahua border for the child. Those attacked were members of the LeBaron family, a well-known American clan who has lived in the community in the northern part of the country for decades, according to The New York Times. The attack targeted citizens who live in a community founded as part of an offshoot of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. "This is the time for Mexico, with the help of the United States, to wage WAR on the drug cartels and wipe them off the face of the earth," Trump tweeted. "We merely await a call from your great new president! "President Andrés Manuel López Obrador refused that approach, however, saying at a Tuesday news conference, "The worst thing you can have is war." "We declared war, and it didn't work," Lopez Obrador said, referring to the policies of previous administrations. "That is not an option." Trump has repeatedly raised concerns about levels of gang violence and drug-related crime in Mexico, particularly as it relates to securing the U.S.-Mexico border...  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-calls-for-war-against-mexican-drug-cartel-monsters-after-americans-murdered-in-shootout  
.
A Corrupt Resolution's Damning Consequences
pkCUEXcL5XbqxWruOycpu9lZ5JUfZNmmgK7OG-n9eI1eQ1Dp3sbGIpqQfASxugX9yu4AsQQkYQkQSVauJrkE3AX5Mw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Chris Farrell
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ November, the month signaling the approach of winter, brings the American public the promise of a bitter, dishonest, political spectacle... casting a poisonous gloom over the traditional winter holidays celebrating faith and family. Worse -- the long-term consequences may irreparably damage our constitutional republic. House Resolution 660 is a false and maliciously dishonest legislative maneuver by Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi, intended retroactively to inoculate Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff (D-CA), et al. from their earlier "inquiry" abuses, and possible criminality. Criminality? Yes -- abuse of power on a grand scale, as well as the violation of individual rights and constitutional due process guarantees can be criminal. Speaker liar-Pelosi's unilateral declaration on September 24, 2019, of an "official inquiry," now bears the phony, partisan imprimatur of the House of Representatives, by a slim margin of 232-196. We are not witnessing a legitimate impeachment process, and certainly not any form of justice recognizable in America since the Massachusetts Spring of 1693. Let's examine the particular dishonest elements of liar-Pelosi's "Open and transparent investigative proceedings by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence" -- that's Section 2 of her Resolution. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, decides "witness testimony relevant to the investigation." scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls subpoena authority. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls record production and evidence designation. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls written interrogatories. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls the outcome of Minority referrals to the Committee for reconsideration. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls all transcripts, to include: release, redactions and edits. scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls "custody of records or other materials relating to the inquiry." scumbag-Schiff, unilaterally, controls the final report. "Open and transparent" -- right. I have written previously of the scumbag-Schiff committee's "Star Chamber" characteristics and activities. Now, with House Resolution 660, the aberration is the norm. Interestingly, opposition to the resolution was bipartisan: Two Democrats -- Van Drew (NJ) and Peterson (MN) -- joined all the Republicans and voted "No". With liar-Pelosi's slim 36-vote margin of "victory", the House of Representatives has engaged and enacted the odious philosophical principles of Legal Positivism -- the perversion antithetical to the Founders' Natural Law foundations in our Constitution. Legal Positivism gives us: "We say it's legal, so it is." Think about the historical lessons of that mephitic mentality. How does that end?...  "Safety valve" remains the United States Senate.   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15127/corrupt-impeachment-resolution 
Republican Jewish Group Launches 
Campaign Calling Dems Shanda
bkL7X78Lls1HVyY8Yd8ug5uRombcBrugo0GOlXlX1czZemfXr4mp8k5t2ERIxx8V0jGYsd_wE-pMbFm2tv1L6CjFoJbf7Tg-vzXQRL0paoRGq9hBcbG2V4RghbmEXiAtsfJkOLPq8-0MjciKvvfY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By OMRI NAHMIAS and RON KAMPEAS/JTA  
{ jpost.com } ~ The Republican Jewish Coalition launched a $10 million campaign — an unprecedented amount in partisan Jewish advertising... with online ads depicting 2020 Democratic presidential candidates as a “disgrace.” Videos titled “Shanda,” Yiddish for “disgrace,” blast the Democrats for saying they would consider reducing aid to Israel.   “The radical Left has taken the reins of the Democratic Party, and their policy proposals will devastate our national security, our alliance with Israel, our economy, and our health care system,” Matt Brooks, the RJC’s executive director, said in a statement announcing the release of the 15- to 30-second ads. The placement of the videos on Facebook, YouTube and other media will cost $50,000. Brooks confirmed to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency a report in Axios that the RJC had budgeted $10 million for its 2020 efforts. Brooks explained that the ad is a first in a multi-million-dollar effort to reelect Trump and other Republicans in Congress. According to Brooks, RJC's digital and television ads had an impact in states like Florida and Pennsylvania during the 2016 elections. "We want American Jewish voters to understand what's at stake in November 2020," he said. " Look for much more from the RJC in the months ahead." In the 15- to 30-second spots, “leading Democrats” are accused of “turning their back” on Israel. They show House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer, who is Jewish. scumbag-Schumer and liar-Pelosi were featured speakers last week at the J Street annual conference, where three of the four Democrats leading in polls ahead of primaries said they would consider cutting some aid to Israel to leverage compliance with U.S. policy. Those three are Sens. commie-Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren of Massachusetts, as well as Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana. Four other candidates rejected leveraging aid, including former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden, another front-runner, in forceful terms...   https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Republican-Jewish-group-launches-campaign-with-ads-calling-Dems-shanda-606883 
.
Official: Australia Committed to U.S.
Partnership as Relationship with
Beijing Grows More Complex
TdQCPLuHoIHZ_P0udAsCxbZ16DOjthQGXemwP2pSr3lqaURx9VGhHL4nRgtRXv0cmi2kwq8SoVhaTHqOWo4NM14gNIrmRL0D2ZXTdfQk_g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By John Grady
{ news.usni.org } ~ No country, including the United States, is capable of going it alone, trying to meet the economic and military challenges of the Indo-Pacific region... said Australia’s defense minister. “Deterrence is a shared responsibility,” said Linda Reynolds, a retired brigadier general in Australia’s reserve force, and the nation’s defense minister since May, during an appearance at the Hudson Institute on Friday. Canberra “is clear-eyed” that the “benign strategic environment is no more and is not coming back.” “We lie at the heart of the Indo-Pacific,” and “this reality has required hard work” to meet the rising challenges from a North Korea with nuclear weapons capability and a rapidly expanding missile arsenal, continued volatility in the South China Sea over territorial claims and the extensive modernization of military forces, by Beijing during the past decade. New threats from hypersonicmissiles and cyber attacks are particularly disturbing. “The active role played by the United States is the key to peace and prosperity,” she said. The attractiveness of the United States’ soft power — willing to invest without imposing crushing debt loads as it did during World War II to Great Britain with Lend Lease “is as important to me as hard power” in fostering regional stability and demonstrating the benefits of “a rules-based order” for continued growth.The alliance between the United States and Australia is a “mateship,” a relationship that began on the battlefields of France a century ago and continued into Afghanistan, Reynolds said. “But it is a bond that much be renewed with every generation.” in meeting the challenges of today and tomorrow. Canberra is willing to participate in countering the threats, Reynolds said. Successfully keeping the Indo-Pacific secure economically and militarily, she continued, relies heavily on the tone Australia sets when dealing with other nations large and small. Beijing poses both a security challenge to Canberra and remains its largest trading partner, making China the biggest challenge facing Australia. “Our values are what defines us,” and “that is non-negotiable,” Reynolds said. “China matters in ways … that require deft handling.”...   https://news.usni.org/2019/11/04/official-australia-committed-to-u-s-partnership-as-relationship-with-beijing-grows-more-complex?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=ef67a3502f-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-ef67a3502f-231491269&mc_cid=ef67a3502f&mc_eid=3999f18767
.
Does Catherine Herridge Leaving for CBS News Portend a Left Turn for Fox News?
4ymmqYugha6fOp21MgBChxDl9fqnbuEFqdorbeB-kZ2bcFwX69HQ08P68daoXsVJjWnvT-ruPh3LOxoT9tkhIRylyIdlgDnQ7lCtUN7N7AxFnU5hVmQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Peter Barry Chowka
{ americanthinker.com } ~ The announcement last Thursday that popular veteran Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge would be leaving the channel the following day – and moving to a new job as Senior Investigative Correspondent at CBS News later this month... took both viewers and media watchers by complete surprise. On the heels of the declaration three weeks earlier by prominent Fox News Channel news host Shepard Smith during his afternoon program that he would be leaving the channel that same day, the news about Herridge occasioned an immediate wealth of wild speculation by pundits weighing in with their opinions about what her departure means for the future of Fox News. For example, an article at a popular conservative site, Wayne Dupree dot com currently ranked #1,430 of all U.S. Web sites by Alexa, offered the headline “Need More Proof Fox News is Circling The Drain? Award-Winning Journalist Catherine Herridge is Leaving:” As Fox News circles the liberal drain, Herridge was one of the reasons to keep watching, because she embodied the “fair and balanced” mantra that Fox abandoned years ago. This kind of fact-challenged spin typifies a popular online meme about Fox News that has been circulating among conservatives during the past two years – the assertion that the channel is taking a major “turn to the left.” Before revisiting the validity of that claim, it is useful to review some actual facts, and also to consider a modicum of not unreasonable speculation, about Catherine Herridge’s departure from Fox News. Catherine Herridge is now 55 years old. She has worked at Fox News as a reporter since the channel launched in October 1996. Previously, she worked at ABC News. Initially at Fox, she was a political reporter known for covering the post-White House political career of scumbag/liar-Hillary Rodham Clinton and also for reporting a wide variety of breaking news stories. In recent years, Herridge has had the title Chief Intelligence Correspondent and has appeared on both FNC news and conservative prime time opinion programs, reporting on developments in the cases of alleged Russia collusion and, in recent weeks, the efforts to impeach President Donald Trump. Catherine Herridge’s departure, absent any factual evidence to the contrary, should not be immediately interpreted as having an ominous broader meaning about the future of Fox News and its direction leading up to the 2020 elections. That, of course, could change in the future...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/does_catherine_herridge_leaving_for_cbs_news_portend_a_left_turn_for_fox_news.html 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
ABA Trashes Another Judicial Nominee
Q97Y8X3y8V-XfsxXiekMctod7cJZoWeAN128p6X8L3CYvDKaRI_DR2gnWWmO-pgMivd5llA7c5q7-iMnfvky92GyhH6W3JktA-FURudveVkF_uvB-KnhL1oqVj4_qtcOb8MPe4njzToKQztUK62B44mb2PImOi6RDulpWqE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Political Editors:  Leftists long ago understood the importance of a like-minded judiciary — which is why they’re no longer content to merely oppose conservative judicial nominees. These days, their goal is to personally destroy them. Such is the sad case yet again with Lawrence VanDyke, the man President Donald Trump nominated for a seat on the Ninth Circuit Court — a court Trump is effectively reshaping.

In vigorous opposition to Trump is the American Bar Association (ABA), a leftist judicial organization known for “scoring” nominees for the bench. Often hailed by Chuck scumbag-Schumer and other Democrats as the “gold standard” for judicial evaluation, the group has essentially become the Southern Poverty Law Center of judicial activism. Thus, it recently tarred VanDyke as “Not Qualified,” just as it once did to Robert Bork.

VanDyke, the ABA argued in its two page assessment, “is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules.” Worse, ABA said, VanDyke may be a bigot, warning that he “would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably members of the LGBTQ community.”

First of all, the idea that any judicial nominee would hesitate to say he’d be fair to any litigant is absurd. Yet asked during confirmation hearings if the ABA’s allegation was correct, VanDyke was moved to tears. “I did not say that. I do not believe that,” he insisted, before adding, “It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God and they should all be treated with dignity and respect.”

Indeed, as The Resurgent’s Matthew Monforton writes, “VanDyke has represented LGBT clients, including before the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The ABA is hardly alone in smearing constitutional constructionists, but the group enjoys special access for evaluation, and it’s clearly time to revoke that privilege. Republican senators Mike Lee and Josh Hawley are bent on making it happen.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66480?mailing_id=4625&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4625&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Tues/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
scumbag/liar-nObama 
Rings Hollow on 'Cancel Culture'
ry6GcFUtLzKfpylyzat9vMt2EkDW1Fcl-0Bk5Yg2ZgnAbjBeUaYVZOnp1HDMc88YvEa0KF-67dFkmxxXBM4xZxtJdE-wlw0z8X9rWRXo110uvFmL5WSPLVkAE7CeFOB1mTlTnAQmSKJ5WL86SJ8kKtMOdQyqZH4xbmbMU-A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Michael Swartz  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Tuesday Top News Executive Summary
fT3JwtZjCoTMMZRkk8Ny9VjOPsp3I4g1SZforS4rh2s49xZLR6tPqVmX8KwmHOzG3OF7FeEmQwSg_hAV734UpEvT_BWOkaIqLFkwLaoq9HJex_PBLp8eDlKECc6AkneDungOMKlCCXHqmmZqaD4FEFhcJLegJH_0-mHA_sI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


HORRIFIC: Mexican cartel massacre: Nine Americans, including six children, from Mormon offshoot murdered (Fox News)

AT LONG LAST: U.S. begins formal withdrawal from Paris climate agreement (National Review)

Government & Politics


IT BEGINS: Elections in four states offer tests of 2020 voter enthusiasm (Associated Press)

DIRTY POLITICS: House releases impeachment transcripts: Top official said he has never seen similar attempt to use State Department to dig up political dirt in 37-year career (The Resurgent)

UKRAINE PROSECUTOR FIRED: Ukraine to fire Kostiantyn Kulyk, the prosecutor at center of loose lips liar-Biden gas-company controversy (National Review)

IMMUNITY REJECTED: New York court rules Trump must turn over tax returns to grand jury (National Review)

“IT WAS WRONG AND IMPROPER”: commie-AOC settles lawsuit after blocking critic on Twitter — yet continues to block prominent conservative women (The Washington Times)

MAGA: Washington Nationals’ Kurt Suzuki, Ryan Zimmerman show support for Trump during World Series White House visit (The Daily Caller)

Business & Economy


TRADE NEGOTIATIONS: China presses Trump for more tariff rollbacks in “phase one” trade deal (Reuters)

BULL MARKET: Dow hits record as stock-market rally extends into fifth week (Associated Press)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: The real reason for the Iran hostage crisis, 40 years later (Washington Examiner)

POLICY: Government’s dictatorial powers under dinky/liar-Warren’s “Medicare for All” should scare you (Issues & Insights)

SATIRE: “Due process” explained, and how it is used to promote rape culture and toxic masculinity (NPC Daily)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/66584?mailing_id=4633&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4633&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
.
Free College Plans Leave
Vast Majority Worse Off
7iWexNlG2Pb1hzSE4vGwr9Y1h9tE81rJzb4Pp8JyJmkUvSKeZJewgL7VeDY70EaIqi8orRxajDituOwz0AZVEpEzK3ff_9UF1GLdOvtlvtIrfrvn-IcvpjXFGuKWV9v1PNMjKXkR-w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Yuichiro Kakutani 
{ freebeacon.com  } ~ The "free" college plans touted by Sen. Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren (D., Mass.) and other Democratic presidential hopefuls will require radical tax hikes... and leave 86 percent of American households worse off, a recent study found. dinky/liar-Warren and Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) often promise tuition-free higher education and student debt cancellation on the campaign trail. However, a National Bureau of Economic Research study conducted by University of Wisconsin researchers found that free college translates to a hollowed-out higher education system that leaves many Americans worse off. Researchers simulated two scenarios: one in which the federal government forces states to adopt tuition-free public colleges and another in which it provides subsidies to encourage states to do so. They calculated how each plan would affect the welfare of American households. The welfare function was derived from, among other things, the positive and negative impacts of higher tax rates and lower education costs. "Over 86% of all households would lose while about 60% of the lowest income quintile would gain from such policies," the study found. In both scenarios, the free tuition policy benefited a group of the poorest Americans at the expense of everyone else. For the vast majority of U.S. households, any benefit derived from a free college plan was outweighed by its negative consequences. Sens. dinky/liar-Warren and commie-Sanders, as well as former scumbag/liar-nObama official Julián Castro, want to make public college free for all Americans. Other presidential candidates, including South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii), backed a less ambitious plan that removed tuition costs only for middle- and low-income families...   https://freebeacon.com/issues/study-free-college-plans-leave-vast-majority-worse-off/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=ed006facf3-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_04_08_55_COPY_262&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-ed006facf3-45611665   
Marie Yovanovitch Transcript a 
Case Study in Narrative Construction
jL3envwZ_eEdgO6RIO5lfVMaLPQn8L3J4jg8hrUrHH7FjEvE3fqetqa9vcNZF3dBLFblyX435ddAfSsKeQoXQUZJWO92AnMibdxc-VMGeMWyd_94nYb7AiZ5HE7nDOisEq0eLoewrKl3y9ztEtW8Z9ZNzec=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Good grief, it was always inferred that House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbagt-Adam Schiff had assembled a ‘star chamber’ proceeding in the HPSCI basement... but after actually reading the transcript of former U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch to scumbag-Schiff’s assembly the bloom is officially off the ruse. Start by remembering: after the 2018 mid-terms, in preparation for the “impeachment” strategy, HPSCI Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare group members to become House committee staff. Chairman scumbag-Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman, and Chairman scumbag liar-Nadler hired  scumbagt/liar-nObama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke.  House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi then hired Douglas Letter as House General Counsel – all are within the Lawfare network. Why is that important?  Because hired Lawfare contractor Daniel Goldman was the inquisitor for the “deposition” of Ms. Yovanovitch. There are no Democrat politicians present other than Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff; it’s all staff. This deposition is a political ruse. Not only was her appearance carefully orchestrated with Chairman scumbag-Schiff’s staff, but Ms. Yovanovitch brought three lawyers with her to help construct the needs of the committee and protect Yovanovitch’s legal interests...
.
Rep. Cheney to Introduce Legislation Mandating
 Full Dismantling of Iran Nuclear Deal
Rt9HRfMhln8etVSovoR4ywJg3ebM-9-3ASvGlsGGEiTpIadc4U9zrg5iH9UXgQoxQvXrPWa7GKpoiI00irFnL7RzECpG3IcJjKNAQ0qEe_0yzUYAqXiYvI82EA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Adam Kredo 
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Rep. Liz Cheney (R., Wyo.) will soon introduce new legislation that would compel the Trump administration to eradicate the remaining vestiges of the landmark Iran nuclear deal... the lawmaker told the Washington Free Beacon. Cheney's legislative effort comes as GOP hawks in Congress have launched an offensive against the Trump administration's decision to again grant Iran sanctions waivers that permit it to conduct sensitive nuclear work, including at an underground bunker site that once housed the regime's atomic weapons program. The legislation is yet another sign of mounting frustration among hawkish Republicans over the Trump administration's mixed signals on Iran. Critics allege the administration is backtracking on its own "maximum pressure" campaign on Iran in order to preserve possible diplomacy with Tehran down the road. The Free Beacon reported last week that the Trump administration's State Department had signed off on the nuclear waivers, despite public and private pressure from anti-Iran voices on Capitol Hill. The debate marks one of the clearest divides yet between typically faithful Trump administration supporters in Congress and those inside the administration. Cheney told the Free Beacon that the waivers have helped legitimize Iran's nuclear infrastructure and paved a way for it to continue working on sensitive nuclear issues with help from countries such as China and Russia. "These ‘civil nuclear' waivers legitimize Iran's illicit nuclear infrastructure and help sustain President scumbag/liar-nObama's disastrous nuclear deal," Cheney said. "Congress is determined to support President Donald Trump's rightful exit from that deal and his successful maximum pressure campaign against Tehran." "That is why I will soon be introducing legislation that revokes these exceptions and ensures that the nuclear deal is totally and completely dismantled," Cheney said...
.
Lev Parnas Changes Course, Now Willing 
to Comply with Impeachment Probe
rKgUuNTbC92jqHFPPpu9d5NQlM3_aTJ1fuE4CMeriEg6rSiLNCXk63wbx_A9aszYEQnROSIQWiOynva4oieHGgTIXShC7rrlYQQ6Yqm3ssdzXmhMAOEpRijelObP_wBwaVAi55A4Zwk-DcRHrdvZmLSliQan_-GLfnjq8Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By TOBIAS HOONHOUT
{ nationalreview.com } ~ Ukrainian-American businessman Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani who was arrested last month on charges of violating campaign-finance law... and has emerged as a central player in the events that led the House to open a presidential-impeachment inquiry, has changed course and will now comply with the inquiry, according to his lawyer. “We will honor and not avoid the committee’s requests to the extent they are legally proper, while scrupulously protecting Mr. Parnas’ privileges including that of the Fifth Amendment,” Parnas’s lawyer Joseph Bondy told Reuters. Parnas was subpoenaed by the House on the same day that he and his business partner, Igor Fruman, were charged with illegally disguising donations to Republican candidates “for the purpose of gaining influence with politicians so as to advance their own personal financial interests and the political interests of Ukrainian government officials.” Their deadline to comply was set for October 16, which passed with neither testifying. Parnas’s reversal comes the same day of the release of the House testimony of Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. Ambassador to the Ukraine, who complied with a subpoena and testified on October 11, a day after Parnas and Fruman were arrested. In her testimony, Yovanovitch alleges that the two men, in coordination with Giuliani, were key forces behind her eventual ouster. “There were two individuals from Florida, Mr. Parnas and Mr Fruman, who were working with Mayor Giuliani, and that they had set up the meetings for Mr. Giuliani with former Ukrainian prosecutor Mr. Lutsenko,” Yovanovitch said. “And that they were interested in having a different ambassador at post, I guess for — because they wanted to have business dealings in Ukraine, or additional business dealings.”   https://www.nationalreview.com/news/lev-parnas-willing-to-comply-with-impeachment-probe/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=breaking&utm_campaign=newstrack&utm_term=18523918   
Lou Dobbs One-on-One 
With Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
N1UbdDXXzfce8h0bg2x8HhRq5q_sKJnG1xw29rBTyIYbIaDp1dBBxbLuTIsApJapELObxyxf2b0MNKtI2AXDLYsp0X8LihRxnmYjeSQYfmI05PfIcFixqn7PpmPHg8nAdRT8Vc910R2SiBUlc7SadBOHZQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Fox Business host Lou Dobbs interviews Secretary of State Mike Pompeo about the issues with the ongoing sub-contracted Lawfare impeachment program... and the exploitation of State Dept. personnel to attain their objectives. Additionally Secretary Pompeo discusses Iran continuing to work toward building nuclear weapons; the ongoing confrontation with China, and the headline issue today of the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Treaty. With everything we have discovered about the CIA I find myself wondering if former CIA Director Mike Pompeo ever discussed the 2016 issues with POTUS, while curiously watching their relationship for signs of handling.
.
Trump administration to pay $846G to
California over failed bid to add citizenship question to census
1iF5_8siPJ_DtAlRL9tNqD9axFXiN3S551QU7KqYB8Kl13Y3N5ygCnlMpuUHDhOhdaD3pLlItuB3XtIGzvuNtGHb2SJ8HkS2h7XHS0qvxw16r9KkXe8kZNjXX7eteDSWZsHw7yNHJw4E=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brie Stimson 
{ foxnews.com } ~ The Trump administration has agreed to pay $846,000 to the state of California in a settlement over the administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the U.S. Census, according to a report... California sued the Trump administration earlier this year over concerns a citizenship question on the census would lead to underrepresentation of minorities. In June the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration’s reasoning for adding the question, calling it “contrived," and calling on the White House to provide other reasons for wanting the data, The Sacramento Bee reported. In the 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with liberal associate justices  Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagen, Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer. Opposing the California lawsuit were conservative justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. President Trump later blasted the court's ruling in a Twitter message. "Seems totally ridiculous that our government, and indeed Country, cannot ask a basic question of Citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important Census, in this case for 2020," the president wrote. "I have asked the lawyers if they can delay the Census, no matter how long, until the ... United States Supreme Court is given additional information from which it can make a final and decisive decision on this very critical matter." California had argued it could lose billions in funding if its minority populations are underrepresented. In the settlement, the administration will pay California the sum for lawyer fees and related costs incurred by the state. The administration said it would get citizenship information from other sources. In July, Trump signed an executive order directing executive agencies to provide as much citizenship data allowed under the law to the Commerce Department, The Bee reported.   https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-administration-to-pay-846g-to-california-over-citizenship-question-on-census   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
scumbag/liar-nObama Rings Hollow on 
'Cancel Culture'
ry6GcFUtLzKfpylyzat9vMt2EkDW1Fcl-0Bk5Yg2ZgnAbjBeUaYVZOnp1HDMc88YvEa0KF-67dFkmxxXBM4xZxtJdE-wlw0z8X9rWRXo110uvFmL5WSPLVkAE7CeFOB1mTlTnAQmSKJ5WL86SJ8kKtMOdQyqZH4xbmbMU-A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Michael Swartz:  In a recent speech before a foundation bearing his name, Barack scumbag/liar-nObama seemed to stumble upon something sensible: “One danger I see among young people, particularly on college campuses … I do get a sense sometimes now among certain young people — and this is accelerated by social media — there is this sense sometimes of ‘The way of me making change is to be as judgmental as possible about other people.’”

He explained, “If I tweet or hashtag about how you didn’t do something right or used the wrong verb or — then I can sit back and feel pretty good about myself because, ‘Man, you can see how woke I was? I called you out.’” But scumbag/liar-nObama warned, “That’s not activism,” adding, “This idea of purity and you’re never compromised and you always politically woke and all that stuff, that is — you should get over that quickly.”

The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh were struck by the comment, given the source. And, marveled PJ Media’s Jim Treacher, “Is it just me, or does [scumbag/liar-nObama] really sound like a right-winger there?”

There’s certainly a place for being judgmental, but this progressive “cancel culture” has utterly infected entertainment and politics. And when the mere enjoyment of, say, a certain type of food (Chick-fil-A, for example) is grounds for social ostracism by the “wokescold” Left, we have a serious societal problem.

Shane Gillis, who was recently fired from “Saturday Night Live” due to a years-old video that the woke crowd deemed offensive, might agree. So might comedian Dave Chappelle, whose most recent Netflix special called “Sticks & Stones” has just a 38% Rotten Tomatoes rating among critics, who must be more “woke” than a viewership who clearly love the show. “In the special, nothing is off-limits for Chappelle,” wrote The Daily Wire’s Amanda Prestigiacomo, “hitting on so-called ‘cancel culture,’ abortion, guns, race, the #MeToo movement, Jussie Smollett, Michael Jackson accusers, R. Kelly, Louis C.K., and LGBTQ activism.” Sounds like a sensory overload for the social-justice warriors and the antifa book-burners among us.

What’s not funny, though, are the very real consequences for those who get canceled by their culture: lost jobs and career opportunities, social-media bullying, and business boycotts to name just a few. Far from being limited to the odd Hollywood celebrity who loses a gig, the regular Joe now has reason to worry that his water-cooler conversation might get him fired.

Yet while it was nice of the former president to raise our awareness of cancel culture, he’d do well to reflect on his own role as an early adopter. Or has he forgotten that that he told supporters, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun”? Or that he weaponized the IRS against Tea Party groups and used the nation’s intelligence apparatus against an opposing political campaign? We’ll take the core message without the heaping serving of hypocrisy, thanks.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66505?mailing_id=4625&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4625&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
$52 Trillion for Medicare for All?
gHhM8rl0xe9DZbSFhzbxDws3U-6ySdSdoq7HFrVz_A1ZEXzZ-5KCopNL0k7gDcq-7HtxDzae_6yoYYnEpp0gVc5fjrjd8DSbObrKA8NJIq4RJIPNFgyEL-xXr27S2IAkmVjlC18wZAC5tmQUhiOoBr6Zby7xtH8j9EfjMLs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
US will leave Paris climate accord, Trump administration tells UN, starting 
one-year timetable for withdrawal
Ag_AihoZprXmQXyl8l29ZG0sPLvEVwBO_hMPwu4a0XzmePcMy0U-aWmDGWduH4gc4M8dlIoPlwq93rnW3ewrjclXGkpFqe4hEjxI2J0NiScWrLYNu3yp2D1vJLlkIM72YwFmDrkLDCsu1rwhftPQjGK6OE2wy6gjkS3qB5gcVtScvV85nwQfcFniYqAJEBWDGQptz_cQ0y8xCxtoWP9crONGnvM87xyGnLkbPJbhJfo5ZqG45e0HsfHrAGte982p2CCBTuc7kiCU-7ceI624OmqXThMBN_hW3Ww2i20_jeebRKpKhy1eOCdLyeMvJ9FAXpWJ9cmn3Fca_4e_Cug=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Josh Siegel
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ The Trump administration is starting the process of leaving the Paris climate agreement, setting in motion a long-anticipated move to become the first country to exit the pact... The State Department filed a notice Monday of its intention to the U.N. secretary-general. Under the terms of the agreement, the United States had to wait until Monday to submit the paperwork even though President Trump announced in June 2017 that he rejected the deal. "President Trump made the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement because of the unfair economic burden imposed on American workers, businesses, and taxpayers by U.S. pledges made under the Agreement," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement. Filing the paperwork starts a one-year countdown for the actual withdrawal that can become official one day after the November 2020 presidential election. That one-year lag could provide an opportunity for other countries to persuade Trump to change his mind, but that’s unlikely given his long-standing opposition. Still, the State Department will continue to send delegations to international climate talks in the meantime, including this December’s technical negotiations held by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. "In international climate discussions, we will continue to offer a realistic and pragmatic model — backed by a record of real world results — showing innovation and open markets lead to greater prosperity, fewer emissions, and more secure sources of energy," Pompeo said. "We will continue to work with our global partners to enhance resilience to the impacts of climate change and prepare for and respond to natural disasters."...  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/trump-tells-un-he-is-breaking-with-paris-climate-accord?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_Breaking%20News%20Alert_11/04/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_Breaking%20News&rid=5261  
.
House Republicans plan to call scumbag-Adam 
Schiff to testify in impeachment inquiry, 
say he is 'fact witness'
IK7HW2mWCvBACVyD3N_cQjdSwAeZDNTN06uVSKC6bm8r_UPIJw7UcZsjuMGvJ0YK5pDS04rT7gJ5Om7BLHXLhqsl8CNNI2sVbX8z6FAvcUSB4sbEhBTUwTfLeuAmU6K9LJwKEnAA2-ofILMLwd4A9EhWUwAyzt9TKUfeNDloGVxMwXfm5QKcQsmWKMGKqMN9KyjT4V2t7zPd3dREPKIH24WFnA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brooke Singman 
{ foxnews.com } ~ House Republicans plan to call Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff as one of their first witnesses in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump... following the adoption of formal rules for the investigation, claiming he is a “fact witness” due to his office's early involvement with the whistleblower whose complaint sparked the proceedings. A source familiar with Republicans’ strategy moving forward in the  impeachment inquiry confirmed to Fox News on Monday that GOP members plan to call scumbag-Schiff, D-Calif., for questioning -- even if they are unlikely to succeed. The source told Fox News that Republicans want answers to questions like: “How many times did he meet with the whistleblower? What did they advise the whistleblower to do? How much was scumbag-Schiff involved in this? Did he recommend the whistleblower give the complaint to the intelligence community inspector general, even though there was no intel component, so that he could be involved?” scumbag-Schiff maintains that he has not personally spoken with the anonymous whistleblower. However, it was revealed several weeks ago that the whistleblower at least had early contact with his office, essentially giving them a heads-up about the complaint concerning Trump's July phone call with Ukraine's president. Regarding that early discussion, the GOP source noted that Republicans could be interested in hearing from the “anonymous” scumbag-Schiff staffer involved. Republicans' effort to devise a strategy going forward comes after the House approved rules for the process last week. While Republicans opposed the resolution and complained the rules were unfair, they still gave minority Republicans the ability to subpoena witnesses, with the concurrence of Democratic committee chairs. If the chair does not consent, the minority can appeal to the full committee. This process still gives Democrats final say over witnesses, however, and the GOP source acknowledged it's unlikely they would go along with the efforts to call scumbag-Schiff -- who is essentially leading the impeachment probe. But GOP lawmakers for days had telegraphed that they were interested in making the attempt...
.
House committees release first transcripts from closed-door impeachment hearings
_s9gCP0LAQ37zL-6lhEGr498_H2KYq-1GZ2qYfXOlALS54xGStHCHna4LfEMHAojnEmTsqESG4fb1jFj8PGnh_bDP8j3QsvYOTmurosqjKTe1H5XQ9Cpm5le_KcgwtGoZE-Rfkn_RYQbaOnH9XJF7hilmz8P6R5gS7pwK4E2E0Oso-9vYGCX4WFUFeSJT0z5yygTgDPYD-tYtLBSjIQ8Zj1B-hpv50eNoX74qp5uQ178JwW93adZWsoDkFkA7hHOYxECZwQ0jgnWd1zD4ca-v5bqSDsiB9AlM2HYMQJ2spywoWfSKgMWo09XgKVcb_UoqzvGsHhUQ8fi2vAAkW8M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Madison Dibble
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ House committees have released two transcripts from private hearings related to impeachment proceedings against President Trump... The transcripts, made available Monday, include the questioning of Michael McKinley, a former senior adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. In a press release about the transcripts, committee leaders scumbag-Adam Schiff, scumbag-Eliot Engel, and Carolyn Maloney, noted that this is the first step in taking the impeachment investigation public. “As we move towards this new public phase of the impeachment inquiry, the American public will begin to see for themselves the evidence that the committees have collected,” they wrote. “With each new interview, we learn more about the president’s attempt to manipulate the levers of power to his personal political benefit.” These transcripts are the first full hearings to be released, though several details were leaked by members inside the proceedings. McKinley, who resigned from his position advising Pompeo, claimed he was “disturbed” by Trump’s request for dirt on 2020 presidential hopeful loose lips liar-Joe Biden. Yovanovitch had been a critic of Trump before her testimony before Congress took place, leaving the president to claim, “She would not accept me as the new president.” These are just the first of several transcripts to be released. On Sunday, California Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier claimed most of the transcripts would be available to the public by the end of the week.
The redact transcripts: WHY?
.
 Hamas Threatens to Shower 
Israel with Rockets for 6 Months
AHkDsB-XQjQyaLW1taPNNI8QbSy-d6nUmQ-z42sH5ODK7RWOZKKoseYaoX364chqwRanD5uOzVGr3pxX6IxKuEytTeOtiMXKb9TJ_TOrYknhBBtzkxJqE2FPwO95boomyCUXcHw6OPOeqCd-1eW3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By YASSER OKBI/MAARIV and KHALED ABU TOAMEH  
{ jpost.com } ~ Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar said in a speech on Monday that, "we have a military force in the Gaza Strip that the enemy is making a big deal for... We have hundreds of kilometers of tunnels, hundreds of control rooms above and below the ground, thousands of anti-tank missiles and thousands of mortar shells." He added that, "we can turn the enemy cities into ghost towns if they decide to attack us." According to him, what would not happen with words would happen with fire and weapons. "The whole world must know that in Gaza there are about 70,000 armed young men from all the Palestinian factions, and we have young people who believe in the Palestinian cause and will achieve the purpose of the people," he said.  Sinwar continued: "We saw that the Zionist enemy was ruled by an extreme Right, seizing the opportunity to make Al Aqsa Mosque Jewish and destroy its foundations from within." He noted that, "the US administration moved its embassy to Jerusalem and declared it the capital of the occupying entity and there were leaks from the century deal, which meant pushing the Palestinian issue." "The blockade and strangulation on the Gaza Strip has come to kill Gaza and its residents - and yet we have accomplished a lot over the last two years," he said. Sinwar said that Hamas won't allow the "humanitarian crisis" in the coastal enclave to continue. "We won't wait for too long," he said. Israel, he said, "should prepare for something big." He said that resolving the "humanitarian crisis" in the Gaza Strip should be at the top of the agenda of Israeli leaders. The crisis "has affected all walks of life because of the blockade and sanctions imposed on the Gaza Strip," he added. "The blockade aims to force our people to surrender and revolt against the Palestinian resistance." Sinwar said that Hamas has told the Egyptian mediators that it will "strike at Tel Aviv for six full months" unless the crisis is resolved. "We have hundreds of kilometers of tunnels and thousands of anti-armored weapons and locally made rockets," the Hamas leader said. "The missiles manufactured in the Gaza Strip will crush the world's most powerful tanks, turning them into burnt iron," Sinwar claimed. Addressing recent developments in the political field, he said: "Our stance has led to the uprooting of the Israeli government and Liberman, and we brought about a crisis that not even two elections  could solve. Maybe they'll have a third one." Sinwar revealed that Hamas has formed an "operations room" together with 13 Palestinian groups in to repel any Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip. Iran, he said, deserves big credit for building Hamas's military force...   https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Hamas-leader-Our-forces-are-ready-to-bomb-Tel-Aviv-for-six-whole-months-606836 
Two Democrats Mention 'Bribery' 
As Possible Reason to Impeach Trump
K3LdkOwyAaMEgxm-DQCj-tvL_mTxcQp0NCN-3y3yyuRpBAl6iB65XK3sFXW6v9o71trawhO7rliVMuD2C26R0CdOyiTSd1a3riiTFiGmLxb9Humg8lgvSP3u5eBJamxNZOyXsNnCKZA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Susan Jones
{ cnsnews.com } ~ The desire to impeach President Donald Trump requires a solid basis to do so, and if "quid pro quo" isn't enough, how about "bribery?"... Two Democrats used that word on different Sunday talk shows. Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) raised "bribery" in a conversation with CNN's "State of the Union," hosted by Dana Bash.Bash told Clyburn, "The Constitution says, as you know, that the president must be impeached for -- quote -- 'treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.' Which of those did the president commit?" "Well, I have no idea," Clyburn responded: And that's why we're doing this investigation. What I'm saying is, there seems to be an indication that something was going on here. There could be high crimes and misdemeanors taking place. There might even be bribery taking place. That's why you have an investigation. And that's what we're doing here. And starting this week, we are going to release these transcripts for people to see and read for themselves. We're going to have public hearings starting maybe this week or next. And we will get to the bottom of this, and then we will be able to make a determination at that time whether or not something happened that was treasonous. I have talked to a lot of people since I have been home who believe that it's treasonous on the part of this president. They certainly believe some crimes have been committed. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), a member of the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees, was asked by CBS's "Face the Nation" if she thinks the articles of impeachment will ultimately include things other than Ukraine... How can this be fair when onside takes to release these transcripts. It should of been open hearing from the beginning.
.
Federal appeals court says Trump can't 
shield tax returns from subpoena
3VsJH2DO7pBg_vkzmXcnokeP_-XedU0GJYaAoa7Ve8j5lD1qLwBuoPGwMj-I2_lR8hezvC-jnZDW9buUM0_jO_aq8tbYWqsyIShmGGqCrPbWj6790hmKDRZQW35UpjpWDwUrRI4nd73lgO-d2tPJ2eeXEezzePtBtj1BWoB3eHOFNTsjwZRgHrm4pbQdd4hiFRd-fyUcmPrOlZFzGHn1JafnJQqHGswpbH3lE9HNytgqk9wRFg26LM8gdifpCGYDvBcWkB1qEnz2QJrHIjmPUYjE-qAborOAIl59kYwU3R4ZCcSLiuHKp-hgRXn4ISUXKhlcj6SCZRXQ-dhE6Rk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Melissa Quinn
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ A federal appeals court in New York rejected a bid from President Trump to avoid having eight years of his tax returns handed over to prosecutors... The unanimous decision from the three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit is the latest loss for the president, who has sought to stop his longtime accounting firm from complying with subpoenas for the financial records. The ruling says financial records can be handed over by Mazars USA. Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance sought the president’s tax returns from 2011 and beyond, along with other financial records as part of state prosecutors’ investigation into hush money payments made to two women who claim to have had affairs with Trump in the early 2000s. “The only question before us is whether a state may lawfully demand production by a third party of the president’s personal financial records for use in a grand jury investigation while the president is in office,” the 2nd Circuit said in its ruling. “With the benefit of the district court’s well-articulated opinion, we hold that any presidential immunity from state criminal process does not bar the enforcement of such a subpoena.” The ruling is likely to be appealed, setting up a showdown before the Supreme Court. Trump's lawyers had argued he is immune not only from prosecution while in the White House but also from being investigated by state prosecutors.  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/federal-appeals-court-says-trump-cant-shield-tax-returns-from-subpoena   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
$52 Trillion for Medicare for All?
gHhM8rl0xe9DZbSFhzbxDws3U-6ySdSdoq7HFrVz_A1ZEXzZ-5KCopNL0k7gDcq-7HtxDzae_6yoYYnEpp0gVc5fjrjd8DSbObrKA8NJIq4RJIPNFgyEL-xXr27S2IAkmVjlC18wZAC5tmQUhiOoBr6Zby7xtH8j9EfjMLs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren’s much-ballyhooed plan to implement Medicare for All has been released, and it’s a doozy. The estimated cost comes in at “just under $52 trillion” over the next 10 years. Yeah, read that again. All the while, dinky/liar-Warren repeats her tired refrain, “We don’t need to raise taxes on the middle class by one penny.” And we have oceanfront property in Arizona for sale.

Suddenly, commie-Bernie Sanders’s version of Medicare for All is a comparative bargain, whether at the initially estimated $32 trillion or his later figure of $40 trillion.

“When fully implemented,” Warren says, “my approach to Medicare for All would mark one of the greatest federal expansions of middle class wealth in our history. And if Medicare for All can be financed without any new taxes on the middle class, and instead by asking giant corporations, the wealthy, and the well-connected to pay their fair share, that’s exactly what we should do.”

When the top 1% already pays the lion’s share of income taxes while the bottom half pays roughly nothing beyond payroll taxes, what exactly does “fair share” mean?

Fox News explains, “The campaign’s detailed Medicare-for-all proposal … insists that the costs can be covered by a combination of existing federal and state spending on Medicare and Medicaid, as well as roughly $20 trillion in taxes on employers, financial transactions, the ultra-wealthy, large corporations and more. This includes what is essentially a payroll tax increase on employers, something economists generally say can hit workers in the form of reduced wages.” Ah, there it is — tax increases for the middle class. dinky/liar-Warren has finagled the numbers to avoid an income tax increase for the middle class, while disguising the real cost in the payroll tax. Those taxes are technically split between employer and employee, though even the leftist Tax Policy Center acknowledges the economic reality of reduced wages: The “employee bears the burden of both the employer and employee portions of payroll taxes.”  Just Tuesday, we added up dinky/liar-Warren’s “freebies,” concluding her plans would cost $4.2 trillion on top of the current federal budget of $4.75 trillion. But her new Medicare numbers blow that out of the water, as that alone would add $5.2 trillion per year.

Did we mention that even she admits her healthcare plan could kill two million jobs? We suppose the middle class won’t pay higher taxes if they’re not earning a paycheck.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66508?mailing_id=4625&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4625&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Monday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
In Trump Impeachment Probe, Democrats Refuse to Follow Nixon and
scumbag/liar-Clinton Precedents
yl4hDEcj5FyXDcRmKDaKjKlRL-8ywAeahZKn8U_iueyyNaI5HFurYYZC2aHgL50JEEeBvmdSjI207QUS4IHTioYHqdhWfcGPx5c54NRyMApxgSIsdUz2BiuYyv6YL695w4lOTBT4fb9qDOLb531CeGu3ID8DApo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Hans von Spakovsky
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
House Democrat claims transcripts from 
closed-door impeachment hearings 
will be released in next five days
ldMY8evK7n9ApQKtO0_BDyKwqs3urw9P8lkO-2Wry070sGz2B9kIVNmfWsEsWwNRxdonE2qkWfA6hF17mIlTs4GSpZcUSGdCTbnjQq9zNEg4pGJHAcDXIZ-YgDBN0bdY6-kPy9y-ts_dSKJItXWbW1Sq4DzZY7akaeJhZ84Q1gwIgA-j99BtMcx8vqEcfEqvtrkmiVuTiRgMtyXfX6f9a6VgQtqQuR0sImsTOddJnuxt_HErViQFuRbBV3leHSG0lPyy8hjsKMRMjPic7-pTVX0urvGAY_xWvTmuXHrko-rJs0n-BpSuxeNrDge5w0IyPiHZ6chHzAn_xk6h06Es=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Madison Dibble
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Rep. Jackie Speier estimated that the transcripts from closed-door impeachment testimonies will be made public by the end of next week... Several witnesses have spoken before Congress as part of the impeachment proceedings against President Trump, but almost none of it has taken place in public. Details from the testimonies have only emerged through small leaks, leaving many Republicans frustrated with the process. Speier predicted that the full transcripts from the closed-door hearings will become available "within the next five days" as Democrats prepare for public hearings in the following weeks. “I also think the transcripts are going to start to be released next week, and that’s going to give the American people an eye on exactly what we have heard,” said Speier. “And what we have heard is growing evidence of grounds for impeachment.” She also claimed a release the transcripts will harm Republicans who claim they have been unable to participate in the impeachment process. “The Republicans complained about the process, but the process was very equal,” she said. “They had equal number of members — almost 50 members — that were part of these three committees that could participate in these depositions.” While some transcripts may become available, there are still closed-door hearings scheduled for this week, including a possible testimony from John Bolton. Bolton has yet to confirm if he will participate in the impeachment or not.
.
Hamas: Without Government,
 Israel is Powerless on Gaza
L065t_IPwV2AuyOenYMaQzAgceKdjx-dgqSDv2tyHYJtqN4nxn0f0v42CWryfSEr9Ya_ZNg5V1pOdNtDA7rZalJ3hJDIA7v-_RpsuTPFUhkMmR9Szw1hcLFQAlklPSvguP_7VLcsXcKp8Em4okda=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By TOVAH LAZAROFF and KHALED ABU TOAMEH  
{ jpost.com } ~ The absence of a government has prevented Israel from taking strategic decisions on Gaza or proceeding toward a deal for sustained calm... Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar said on Sunday. “They don’t even have a government that could approve the budget or discuss security issues such as the Iranian threat,” he added. “We are ready to secure the release of our prisoners and make all possible efforts to achieve that.” Sinwar spoke in the aftermath of a violent weekend on the Gaza border, in response to which the interim security cabinet met to discuss options to both prevent further flareups in the South and to counter threats along Israel’s northern border. During the meeting, ministers discussed the possibility of renewing the policy of targeted assassinations, but no decision was taken on the matter, according to Israeli media reports.  Other ideas included ratcheting up the military response to rocket fire. There was also a proposal, according to Channel 12, to offer a series of incentives to improve life for residents of Gaza, with the threat of immediately removing them should the rocket fire continue. No public statement was issued after the meeting. Energy Minister and security cabinet member Yuval Steinitz told Army Radio about the need for a new military campaign against Gaza. “As it seems now, we will be forced to embark on a major military operation, and only then will we come to an arrangement with Hamas,” he said. “If there is no choice, we will also launch a ground campaign to eliminate Hamas rule.” The Hamas leader, however, portrayed Israel as weak as he dismissed claims by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli negotiator Yoram Blum that talks were ongoing for the release of the bodies of the two missing soldiers and for the two men held captive in Gaza. “There are no negotiations over this file,” Sinwar said. The Israeli government is “unable to make decisive decisions on this strategic issue.” Earlier in the day, Netanyahu told his weekly government meeting that Hamas is responsible for every attack originating from the territory of the Gaza Strip...   https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Hamas-Without-government-Israel-is-powerless-on-Gaza-606766   
Trump demands testimony from whistleblower
LvJPtOUPsdi2fPs8j3UCilqAYpjLInAvA8RX-57O8Moqn6pJe6_Pib4XaM_7G9iy1GTiaR9u9p_Lv1JoG1GjP9TazFFPTJIy61soh3WlEMZg6sAZGwjwuCl8_mT3GcCrkugJZcdRRHc68_KWM9bgknmCMYZuCNhPgZMA8jRzED06-HuRV4b9XHjqsL_QNJursmAVm_9UsodCmL8cUvrYf1xwpzewI5OOvW2m6GMi_NUhjvM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By MORGAN CHALFANT
{ thehill.com } ~ President Trump on Monday demanded that the anonymous whistleblower who raised an alarm about his contacts with Ukraine testify... Trump said it was “not acceptable” for the whistleblower to answer written questions from Republican lawmakers in connection with the House impeachment inquiry, as his attorneys communicated was on the table on Sunday. And he  claimed without evidence that the whistleblower gave “false information.”The president also referenced revelations that the whistleblower contacted House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff’s (D-Calif.) committee for guidance before filing the complaint, calling the top Democrat “corrupt.” “The Whistleblower gave false information & dealt with corrupt politician scumbag-Schiff. He must be brought forward to testify,” Trump tweeted Monday morning. “Written answers not acceptable! Where is the 2nd Whistleblower? He disappeared after I released the transcript. Does he even exist? Where is the informant? Con!” Trump has long accused the whistleblower of providing a misleading account of his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and highlighted that the complaint relied on second-hand accounts of other people. According to a White House rough transcript of the call, Trump asked Zelensky to look into unsubstantiated allegations against former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine. The whistleblower, whose identity remains unknown and who is subject to protections under federal law, alleged that Trump was using his official position to solicit foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election, a claim that Trump has rejected. The complaint included details that matched up with the official transcript of the call...   https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/468805-trump-demands-testimony-from-whistleblower   
Bill O’Reilly appears on the Glenn Beck show  DESTROYS Impeachment Coup
XOByhTM1h2Sg4bVxQbDdyRO7kXFuY25HwKon62OV_CVcoHW5WrR_2xHZEfRvUwYppzK4o0C4vkJ_kMyAmWCjFp4lJT-sQgK7o_bGgqmmbnp7GckGspRBcxjzC1sorACIcuVjvs44=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by dailychristiannews.com ~ Bill O’Reilly has busy since his ouster from Fox News, writing books and commenting on the political scene on Twitter... But in yet another sign that his career is again picking up, O’Reilly made a special appearance on the Glenn Beck show – and folks, he hasn’t lost a step. The most powerful and eloquent moment came when O’Reilly laid out the impact of impeachment on the ordinary American citizen. He said: There is nothing good about this number one, and and if you see other people celebrating impeachment you need to just pull them aside and say do you understand that we all are in this together in this country, that we have to have a functioning federal government trying to solve vexing problems, that we must have robust economy to support three hundred and thirty million people most of whom want to improve themselves, do you understand that destroying the office of the presidency – not just the president but the office of it – is counterproductive to freedom, do you understand any of that and you’ll get silence because this isn’t the way impeachment is being presented. Take a listen – there’s more. Skip to 1:10 to get past the chit-chat:
.
Why a Turkish-Backed Militia 
Just Attacked a US Convoy
lr64KKiAjWqE3YOqPiyqXnBy6MXf4WhoKbhiCZZnZxhoQvYOYOEuuujrC2s2FReFOWfVV_NhmMBAzKkJD1X0lL5c3Kn8TOYJJJmhrLWvrxMoejQ8xrZ3gi9xrNTV81rrltO3Uk9Veqb9VQeHgzf094T0tkWLF8sx6e5X38vwtPfS-7hBUXsOdE0dEUf42_v5ampDi7p6_k5RTFW8SrE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Meira Svirsky
{ clarionproject.org } ~ Members of a Turkish-backed militia attacked a U.S. convoy withdrawing from northern Syria and on its way to Iraq. No American troops were killed or injured in the attack... The military unit was on a road which runs parallel to the Turkish border, part of the area taken over by Turkey in its recent incursion into Syria. A U.S. Central Command spokesperson said in a statement that a shell landed about one kilometer away from U.S. forces and posed “no risk.” Meanwhile, a day after the attack, a member of the U.S.-backed group, the Free Burma Rangers, was killed by a drone strike launched by Turkish forces. The Rangers are a group that rescues injured and displaced people near the frontlines in the Syrian war. The Ranger killed — Zau Seng, an assistant medic — was one of the longest serving members of the group. He died on his baby’s first birthday. Another ranger was injured in the attack. Reports from the Rojava Information Centre, a Kurdish media outlet, said this was not the first time Turkish forces had targeted medical personnel. Rather, “throughout its invasion,” trauma centers as well as ambulances operated by Heyva Sor the Kurdish Red Crescent were attacked several times, especially in the city of Ras al-Ain, where there was evidence that the Turks had used chemical agents against the civilian population. Turkey has continually maintained that the takeover of the border area in Syria is necessary to clear “terrorists” from the region. However, Kurds have not launched any attacks on Turkey from the area since 2012. And despite assurance that Turkey was holding by a ceasefire, that has clearly not been the case. In addition, horrific videos have surfaced of members of a Turkish-backed militia vowing to execute and behead any “infidel Kurd” they find in northern Syria...   https://clarionproject.org/turkish-back-militia-attacks-us-convoy-syria/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=f16df58d3d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_11_04_11_07&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-f16df58d3d-6442509&mc_cid=f16df58d3d&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5   
.
John Durham Steps in to Investigate 
the Trump–Russia Probe’s Origins
ZzbpSRbNLG96QWtNR7QXuhiXpqUdU2U5A8vRdeMRMq-FXAHGOYiHXEkT1Luayvi0cSPYxaWB45aQxGIKI1S_Dc-BkSOaqo3jSnhQ56_oQHkpi7LfZYx111i25LYkG7yUaqF5BnFoHpLGSu1G1BoyexqLgVA9a-wK__118oQ8ejccMIFiDJAZLAreM0gldaLCQwNF0SV005Mm94rR=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By JIM GERAGHTY
{ nationalreview.com } ~ Making the click-through worthwhile: A lengthy, detailed, drama-filled profile you must read; the big 2019 election preview... with signs that the stakes are higher for Republicans than they first appear; a new survey that should send Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren supporters into a panic; and several news books from National Review authors. Before I go any further, check out my especially lengthy and detailed profile of John Durham, the legendary federal prosecutor that U.S. attorney general William Barr selected to investigate the origins of the special counsel’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and whether it was properly predicated. I believe this is the longest, most detailed, and most thorough profile of Durham ever written — and he is a man who does not like to be the subject of profiles. Durham’s career has it all — prosecuting mobsters with colorful nicknames, Ku Klux Klan, Whitey Bulger, corrupt FBI agents, ruthless street gangs, threatening the Central Intelligence Agency with an FBI raid, and coming as close as anyone has to cracking the biggest art theft in American history. We have no idea what Durham will find in his investigation of what prompted America’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies to start sniffing around the Trump campaign. But based upon everything I’ve learned while researching his career, reading court records, and interviewing his colleagues and former opposing counsel if Durham comes back with an indictment, he’s extremely likely to get and sustain a conviction. And if he chooses not to press charges, it probably means that no prosecutor could sustain a conviction based upon the available evidence...  https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/john-durham-steps-in-to-investigate-the-trump-russia-probes-origins/  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=.
In Trump Impeachment Probe, Democrats Refuse to Follow Nixon and scumbag/liar-Clinton Precedents
yl4hDEcj5FyXDcRmKDaKjKlRL-8ywAeahZKn8U_iueyyNaI5HFurYYZC2aHgL50JEEeBvmdSjI207QUS4IHTioYHqdhWfcGPx5c54NRyMApxgSIsdUz2BiuYyv6YL695w4lOTBT4fb9qDOLb531CeGu3ID8DApo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Hans von Spakovsky
 

Why are House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democrats so against following historical practices in their impeachment inquiry regarding President Trump?

And why — with their resolution introduced Tuesday to continue their “ongoing investigation” of the president — don’t the Democrats want to provide Republican members with the ability to fully participate in the probe?

What are the Democrats who control the House so afraid of? Do they fear the American people will discover that the Democrats are conducting an unfair, partisan investigation?

The Democratic resolution is expected to be approved by the full House on Thursday — despite strong Republican objections.

Republicans contend there is no “existing” impeachment inquiry because the full House has never voted to approve one — and even the new resolution doesn’t explicitly open such an investigation. This is a dramatic departure from what happened when the full House voted to open impeachment inquiries of Presidents Richard Nixon and scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton.

President Trump and Republicans have raised strong objections to the fact that the current impeachment inquiry of Trump began with the approval of only a single person — Speaker liar-Pelosi. She directed six different House committees to launch the impeachment probe.

Crucially, the Constitution gives the “sole Power of Impeachment” to the House of Representatives — not the speaker of the House. This is a major point that Democrats are glossing over as an insignificant technicality.

In the impeachment inquiries of Presidents Nixon and scumbag/liar-Clinton, Democrats and Republicans took a very different position than liar-Pelosi, D-Calif., is taking today. That’s why there were votes by the entire House putting every member on record on whether an impeachment inquiry should be opened.

Those resolutions were approved and authorized the House Judiciary Committee — not six different committees — to conduct impeachment inquiries.

Page 614 of the 2017 manual on the “Rules, Precedents, and Procedures of the House” — written by the three individuals who have been the parliamentarians of the House of Representative since 1994 — states that under “the modern practice, an impeachment is normally instituted by the House by the adoption of a resolution calling for a committee investigation of charges against the [federal] officer in question.”

This means that liar-Pelosi has violated the modern practice of the House by not having the entire body vote on such a resolution.

So what about the resolution that is expected to come to a vote of the full House on Thursday? This resolution doesn’t say it is to authorize the start of an impeachment investigation, as House Res. 581 did in the case of scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton.

Instead, the new resolution directs the six committees of the House to “continue their ongoing investigations.” But why schedule a vote on a resolution to tell committees to keep doing what they are already doing?

The new resolution also falls short of providing the type of fairness and right to participate in the investigation that the minority party — the Republicans — are asking for and are entitled to.

One of the other criticisms of liar-Pelosi’s lack of a full House vote has been that there was no resolution setting out the rules under which the impeachment inquiry would proceed, including the rights of the minority party. Both the scumbag/liar-Clinton and Nixon resolutions did that.

Again, this is not a minor technicality. It is a major issue.

The new resolution lays out rules governing the discovery process — issuing subpoenas, submitting questions, etc. — but only for two of the six committees: the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees.

So the other four committees — Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, and Ways and Means — can continue to operate however they want to, in secret, denying the minority members the ability to fully participate.

Even in the rules set out for the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, liar-Pelosi has changed the rules from the Clinton inquiry to, in essence, give the Democrats a one-sided advantage.

Under the scumbag/liar-Clinton resolution, H.R. 581, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the ranking minority member could issue subpoenas for witnesses and documents by acting “jointly.” In other words, they acted together to decide who to subpoena and what documents to obtain. If one of them disagreed, the other member had to first refer the matter to the committee before acting on his own.

The House resolution approving an investigation of President Nixon, H.R. 803, had the exact same rule.

But the liar-Pelosi resolution gives the chairmen of the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees the power to act unilaterally — without the approval of the ranking Republican member.

If a Republican wants to issue subpoenas, he or she can only do so with the concurrence of the chairman — that is, the member has to ask: chairman, may I?

If the chairman refuses to agree, the Republican can submit his or her request to the entire committee. But since the Democrats control both committees, is there really anyone out there who thinks they would override Chairmen scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., or scumbag liar-Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.?

One final note. There has been a great deal of discussion about witnesses being questioned in secret and the fact that members of other committees given jurisdiction over the impeachment inquiry have been barred from participating in the questioning being conducted by the Intelligence Committee.

While it is true that congressional committees sometimes question witnesses behind closed doors, there is no reason to do so here. In fact, in a matter as serious and as important as the possible removal of a duly elected president, fundamental principles of fairness and the democratic process demand that such an inquiry be conducted in as transparent a manner as possible.

Further, there is no reason for the Intelligence Committee to question witnesses in secret when there is no classified information being discussed — and the details of the telephone conversation that President Trump had with the president of Ukraine are not classified. And why are members of other committees being barred from participating?

If Democrats want the American people to believe they are conducting an objective, nonpartisan investigation, they need to start acting as if they are. The latest resolution they are proposing falls far short of doing that.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66461?mailing_id=4623&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4623&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Monday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Decentralizing the Federal Workforce
pewBHM1KsSR3B85umQYnVxElnG7DHGSw1ZOXIzKsq6lFjZ-7KyvirFQQcaDx4Lb1M7Jcy6Rh-f4PZPhlfWYn3iNf7RNy3III6nfOgN8uQKpIu8_nBRfstGi8UkGdxLk9GQe0Mt9Xtj5yPgAMSShrM9sLzKpezFN0g1NXuHQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Bureaucrats’ Hurt Feelings On 
Foreign Policy Don’t Justify Impeachment 
HcuyQPfqzRGXObY_iqe6_lRBrH9vkHliRazmDAGQ23CAUCJCR4_bq3q1xi3dVlIQBCq6SufwkGFMxX-_91OHt4o98R7Z7RN7k0MvpzFJThBeQjT4IseGDdWFDLwuA3Qrx3C65S6lbqPt0q_3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Adam Mill
{ thefederalist.com } ~ In recent testimony during his confirmation hearing, the nominee to be U.S. ambassador to Russia said, “Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent... I don’t think that would be in accord with our values.” Never? Let’s do a quick thought experiment. Remember when Donald Trump said he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and still maintain his support? Suppose a candidate for office did shoot somebody and the only witness was a Russian national who then hopped a plane back to Moscow. Now suppose that the only way to prosecute this candidate would be for his political rival the incumbent president to request cooperation from Russia to extradite this material witness back to the United States to participate in a trial. Should he do it? Obviously, in today’s climate, the answer depends on one critical fact: Whose side is the candidate on? If the candidate aligns with the left, then investigating a political opponent would be totally beyond the norms established by our cherished traditions. But if the candidate opposes the left, then the deep state will step in “to protect  the country from that menace.” You see, it’s perfectly fine for scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton to use her campaign funds to hire foreign national Christopher Steele to investigate Trump using probably made-up Russian sources. And there’s nothing wrong with the FBI using those partisan Steele smears to investigate the scumbag/liar-nObama administration’s political opponent. Crossfire Hurricane, the official operational title for the investigation, employed assistance from the British government and an Australian diplomat. So the left believes there’s nothing wrong with asking a foreign government for help to investigate a domestic political opponent — so long as that opponent is Trump. After all, “Nobody is above the law, not even Donald Trump.” But if the shoe ends up on the other foot and Trump is the one investigating, it’s a constitutional crisis!...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/04/bureaucrats-hurt-feelings-on-foreign-policy-dont-justify-impeachment/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=b617332c60-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-b617332c60-83771801   
Jim Jordan -vs- Maria Bartiromo
DyX66PfiOH8UST8EuX3uNblSu_3XNWRbieJZ5LzdniNnMjHHWyni7KfaWTAXMeUZe3kuzNT_E-uMbh4C-Bc6myFVpfEybzhVKchzOdBrqpyCj1eiABcxP6L23H8OLXYYKQ35yEZ2dFeSRBqD46yK5j5IJcRIHopnmCOEVH3Bqw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Representative Jim Jordan discusses the current status of the Democrat impeachment plan with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo... Mr. Jordan breaks down the Democrat resolution that was passed last Thursday and highlights the ridiculous nature of the Dem Scheme.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/sunday-talks-jim-jordan-vs-maria-bartiromo/
.
Weaponizing Impeachment 
against Political Opponents
8uc_51QDT6nVsi-aT0l27QWjcgNC-l4gVdJv78XPnDg6N4hGWDZMZ8So12zIBphRY2BygqDNACQckm-3uK8yHvczxA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Alan M. Dershowitz
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ The constitutional power to impeach a duly elected president was intended by the Framers of the Constitution as a neutral... non-partisan tool of last resort to be used against only criminal incumbents in extreme cases. It is now being deployed as a partisan weapon that can be used routinely against presidents of a different party from those who control the House of Representatives. Under the views of some members of Congress, any time the House is controlled by one party, a simple majority can properly vote to impeach. As Congresswoman scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters put it: "Impeachment is about whatever the Congress says it is. There is no law." She is wrong. The Constitution is the law and she is not above it. The recent partisan misuse of this emergency power began with the impeachment of former President William Jefferson scumbag/liar-Clinton by the Republican-controlled House in 1998. scumbag/liar-Clinton did not commit an impeachable offense, even if he feloniously lied under oath about his sex life. Such perjury, if it occurred, would satisfy the definition of a "crime," but not meet the required Constitutional criteria of a "high crime and misdemeanor." If President scumbag/liar-Clinton committed a crime, it would be a low crime related to his sex life and comparable to the low felonies — adultery and paying off an extortionist — committed by Alexander Hamilton when he was Secretary of the Treasury. Had Hamilton payed the extortionist from Treasury funds, as he was falsely accused of doing, he would have been guilty of an impeachable high crime. To be impeached, a president must commit a crime misdemeanor is a species of crime and the commission of that crime must also constitute an abuse of office. An abuse of office without an underlying crime is a political sin, but not an impeachable offense. This very issue was debated at the Constitutional Convention, where one delegate proposed "maladministration" as the criteria for impeachment and removal of a president. James Madison, the Father of our Constitution, strongly objected on the ground that so vague and open-ended a criterion would have the president serve at the will of Congress and turn us from a Republic with a strong president into a parliamentary democracy in which the chief executive can be removed by a simple vote of no confidence. Instead, the Convention adopted strict prerequisites for impeachment: treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors. The House is no more empowered to substitute its own criteria for those enumerated in the Constitution than the Senate would be to change the 2/3 vote requirement for removal to a simple majority or a 3/5 super majority. Congress is not above the law. It is bound by what the Framers accepted and cannot now apply the criterion the framers explicitly rejected...
.
Iran announces fresh violations of 
nuclear deal with extra, advanced centrifuges
MclTrB6OV4r7oynk7lN58UJmFsLjaivPAmFzieIFtF-cPqO_Cdt3K40xf2_10-eBUVEfERJeE9SDifr2PJIlMZdu5uFSw2-_osKDuVv4oaKPjz4LiAIkTZ2x-s1AwkyFdxvrbEunXG_o-G_ugfqVZw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By NASSER KARIMI and JON GAMBRELL
{ timesofisrael.com } ~ Iran on Monday broke further away from its collapsing 2015 nuclear deal with world powers by announcing it’s doubling the number of advanced centrifuges it operates... calling the decision a direct result of President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement. The announcement — which also included Iran saying it now has a prototype centrifuge that works 50 times faster than those allowed under the deal — came as demonstrators across the country marked the 40th anniversary of the 1979 US Embassy takeover that started a 444-day hostage crisis. By starting up these advanced centrifuges, Iran further cuts into the one year that experts estimate Tehran would need to have enough material for building a nuclear weapon — if it chose to pursue one. Iran long has insisted its program is for peaceful purposes, though Western fears about its work led to the 2015 agreement that saw Tehran limit its enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.Tehran has gone from producing some 450 grams (1 pound) of low-enriched uranium a day to 5 kilograms (11 pounds), said Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. Salehi dramatically pushed a button on a keyboard to start a chain of 30 IR-6 centrifuges at Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, where he was being filmed, increasing the number of working centrifuges to 60. “With the grace of God, I start the gas injection,” the US-trained scientist said...
.
Why scumbag/commie-John Brennan, Peter
Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange
Arrested – And Why UK Officials Obliged
LDYyPhUf_rdA-FYO07kJdZJ5ewIAeKwLCQ2JdZ1fv527_Ao80KbqgjMY1475OAdYkJ2ng1tQWDxgUnXsqAPxRaQtyVKC8DDHE-l5bt0kWg104hyliKNbvx92Zd2N-5lhXrIFyVYTgSgBSb692raZKTacX3C1G-tG4rgzfrpVw6UKUNQUuJBqgA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ According to recent reports U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr are spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election... One recent quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state notes: “One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services””.It is interesting that quote comes from a British intelligence official, as there appears to be mounting evidence of an extensive CIA operation that likely involved U.K. intelligence services. In addition, and as a direct outcome, there is an aspect to the CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control. In this outline we will explain where corrupt U.S. and U.K. interests merge. To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to CIA interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok is clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations. By now people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor now generally admitted/identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the CIA scumbag/commie-John Brennan to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy Rome and London. Go Deep In a similar fashion the CIA tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page.  Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/why-john-brennan-peter-strzok-and-doj-needed-julian-assange-arrested-and-why-uk-officials-obliged/ 
How Impeachment Forces 
the Legislature to Act Judicial
prRk4CPzbYWQxdA1qebgXQowy5WkUV4_hqzmRKmXFiA-bLDGMW3JO9voJjJQe4DQa4bQyE0_78seW2oHopy8LG8ssx9cEzt3bDh1Df-kHodT9YP0MbbjnqpoajxfoQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by SHMUEL KLATZKIN
{ spectator.org } ~ As the House slowly morphs scumbag-Adam Schiff’s free-form closed-door search for a crime towards something close to that will be taken for impeachment... the air is filled with grave assertions that impeachment is a political process. That is only trivially true. While any process involving the chief executive and the legislature is by definition political, impeachment has been granted legitimacy over the years when it has been taken seriously as an act of judicature. The general court of the legislature thus, in fact, the Massachusetts Legislature is still called sits in a judicial role. When impeachment was being established in our Constitution, the Framers were aware of the work of the English common lawyer John Selden, who helped achieve one of the landmark accomplishments on the path to democracy, the 1629 Petition of Right. Selden wrote a work entitled Of the Judicature in Parliaments, which analyzed how in cases of impeachment among others Parliament acted as a judiciary body. If the process were not judicial and only political, the people would have no confidence that any crime worthy of impeachment had been committed. John Adams mentions in his diary how he had referred someone curious about the American impeachment process to Selden’s great work. Understanding impeachment as Selden did to be an act of judicature, the Framers considered and rejected “maladministration” as constitutional grounds for impeachment and chose instead “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Impeachment was not to be the equivalent to the parliamentary vote of no confidence. The Constitution gave the people through the states the right to choose their own chief executive, who was to be independent of the legislature. Rights can only be denied anyone for crimes or misdemeanors, and then only after judicial due process of law. It follows closely the great British jurist William Blackstone’s description: “A prosecution of already known and established law.” English history records a melancholy example of the deterioration of this judicial process: the trial and subsequent execution of King Charles I. By the time Charles was brought to trial, two bouts of civil war had been fought, and Parliament had been reduced through purge to a docile rump that would do only as Cromwell told it. No English lawyer would associate himself with the prosecution, and there was nothing known to English law that was in the end prosecuted. Political power was all that mattered, and some juridical cover was found to dress up the execution in the trappings of due process. But the judgment was only sustained by the sword, and when Cromwell died and the Army lost its political supremacy, the country in a popular convulsion rejected the legitimacy of the king’s execution and set his son and heir up on the restored throne. This they did even as all accepted constitutional parliamentary supremacy — the true legacy of Selden and his fellow lawyers and parliamentarians. The recent turn away from scumbag-Schiff’s blatantly non-judicial process is a partial acknowledgment of truths that Selden and the Framers clearly saw. Yet unlike the proceedings with  Nixon and scumbag/liar-Clinton, the basics of due process have not been forthrightly established: identification of a crime known to law, cross-examination of all witnesses, open access to all evidence, equal right to call witnesses, and most of all, a true sense of judicial responsibility. Without these, the proceedings will not fail to generate revulsion as a violation of our right to have an independent chief executive elected by us, the people, and not serving at the pleasure of the legislative branch. Of course, those who do not have power want it. But if power is to remain in the hands of the people and not in the hands of those most adept at political maneuvering, then this country will decisively spurn any process that does not follow the model of Selden and Adams. If there is a crime, it must be for a crime known to law and with robust evidence and a process worthy of the high standards of American judicature.
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Decentralizing the Federal Workforce
pewBHM1KsSR3B85umQYnVxElnG7DHGSw1ZOXIzKsq6lFjZ-7KyvirFQQcaDx4Lb1M7Jcy6Rh-f4PZPhlfWYn3iNf7RNy3III6nfOgN8uQKpIu8_nBRfstGi8UkGdxLk9GQe0Mt9Xtj5yPgAMSShrM9sLzKpezFN0g1NXuHQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert:  In a time where it might be considered something of an anomaly, Senate Republicans are actually trying to do something to both help the American people and drain the Washington swamp.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) have introduced the “Helping Infrastructure Restore the Economy (HIRE) Act.” The legislation would “require that the headquarters of certain Federal agencies and permanent duty stations of employees of certain Federal agencies be relocated in order to provide an opportunity to build needed infrastructure in certain areas and to share the benefits of Federal employment with economically distressed regions.”

The HIRE Act would move 90% of positions in 10 executive departments to 10 different states. The Department of Agriculture would be headquartered in Missouri, Commerce in Pennsylvania, Education in Tennessee, Energy in Kentucky, Health and Human Services in Indiana, Housing and Urban Development in Ohio, Interior in New Mexico, Labor in West Virginia, Transportation in Michigan, and Veterans Affairs in South Carolina.

“Every year, Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars fund federal agencies that are mainly located in the D.C. bubble,” Hawley explained. “That’s a big part of the problem with Washington: they’re too removed from the rest of America. The HIRE Act will move policymakers directly into the communities they serve, creating thousands of jobs for local communities and saving taxpayers billions of dollars along the way.”

Blackburn agreed. “Moving agencies outside of Washington, D.C. both boosts local economies and lowers costs — that’s a winning combination,” she stated. “This legislation would enable Americans across the country to have greater access to good jobs. Tennesseans would greatly benefit from having portions of the Department of Education in the Volunteer State. It is my hope that the HIRE Act will quickly pass the Senate.”

Unsurprisingly, there was blowback from whence one would expect it to arise. “Employees don’t want to move, and it doesn’t make sense for them to move,” said American Federation of Government Employees spokesman Peter Winch. He further insisted the move “does not serve a public purpose.”

Winch’s handwringing was echoed by DC Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, who vowed to fight the bill. “Hundreds of federal employees and their families have already been impacted by attempts to relocate agencies, which directly hurts their operations,” she said in a statement. “Congress cannot do its job without the unvarnished facts and briefings that nonpartisan agencies give the House and Senate almost daily. I have already gotten language in appropriations bills that would block politically motivated moves outside the National Capital Region, and I will continue to fight these relocations with every tool at my disposal.”

What’s really going on here? What’s alway going on among a cohort of workers grown used to the perks and privileges of government employment. Federal workers who make 17% more in total compensation than comparable private-sector workers, according to a 2017 CBO study. Federal workers who have job protections that make them virtually impossible to fire once they have completed their first year. In all the ensuing years, federal workers can retain their jobs for 170 days after their superiors have decided to fire them. And even after they’re fired, they can file an appeal that takes an average of 243 days to process.

In short, while private-sector workers face a one-in-77 chance of being fired or laid off, the odds of a federal worker being fired are one-in-500, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

More germane, federal workers also receive “Payscale Locality Adjustments,” as in higher pay if one is working in an area with a higher cost of living — which is why moving many of these jobs to low cost-of-living locales would save taxpayers billions of dollars.

Even more revealing is the sense of entitlement. When the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced in June it was moving to the Kansas City area, nearly 80% of the workforce left rather than locate. When Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced the move, employees turned their back in silent protest. “It’s a mixture of outrage and resignation,” USDA researcher Andrew Crane-Droesch said at the time of the announcement, regarding morale at his office. “Nobody wants to move — nothing against Kansas City.”

Really? When Interior Secretary David Bernhardt  announced in July that Bureau of Land Management (BLM) also planned to move 81% of the agency’s headquarters staff west of the Rockies by 2020 — where the federal government controls more than 80% of the land — dozens of former officials denounced the move. “You’re setting up the BLM for failure,” insisted Elaine Zielinski, former BLM director in Arizona and Oregon.

Sally Jewell, former Interior Secretary in the Obama administration, was equally upset. “They are going to take the remaining people, which largely deal with advocacy for the BLM in Washington, DC, and move them to Grand Junction, Colorado. Because that is such an epicenter for political leadership,” she said, also complaining. “If you have raised your family in Washington, DC, you really know this business well, you’ve got relationships on Capitol Hill, your kids are in school, your spouse is working, and they want to move you to Grand Junction.”

“This is a not-so-thinly-veiled attempt to get people to quit,” she added “We are losing really good people across government, and that is partly the intent. I think that is a shame.”

Note the arrogance and sarcasm. American taxpayers can’t possibly expect federal workers to give up their tony lives and connections in the nation’s capital to work in “misbegotten” locales like Grand Junction. Thus, forcing people to do so is really about getting these “noble” public servants to quit instead.

Nonsense. Few things speak to the polarization of this nation more clearly than the idea that “flyover country” is anathema to bureaucrats, because it lacks the cultural “sophistication” of the nation’s capital. And if virtually un-fireable workers wish to terminate their own jobs in protest, one suspects the overwhelming majority of American see that as a win-win, despite all the handwringing by swamp defenders, who assert that moving agencies out of DC is a bad idea “because that’s where decisions get made.”

Like the ones that got us $22 trillion in debt? Yet again, utter nonsense in an age of high-speed Internet, teleconferencing — and legendary bureaucratic inertia epitomized by a Veterans Administration that was allowing people to die, even as data was fudged, waiting lists were kept secret, and VA execs were getting bonuses.

More important, Americans are sick and tired of one-size-fits-all centralized government and a bureaucracy that employs 1.87 million civilian full-time federal employees.

If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is smart, he’ll make this legislation a high-profile priority. Americans deserve to know which senators have their backs — and which ones prefer to preserve swampy status quo.

America has endured government of, by, and for the bureaucracy for far too long.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66462?mailing_id=4623&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4623&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Mon/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Why the Economic Slowdown?
wVrc06WmmeuMxlc3BjgyNgJslojQmiWOB8I_14e7KCMxsydFqggtlHYNwuFYwQzO_LzSdtJP25vg8_qwJFo4-afA4tEUaSXS0sQdTpbFIH--XFJ4zUjwfxFQpb2PMZCYApGlG9ZWjzHlhdA7gNMQDtlDtq_S6vA6e_d1-HQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Monday Top News Executive Summary
wDIRjx-rRXUa1Nr9FFkER-mQkafmPUw4DahgPpvnlFDJzKQ7PSTdepPwFU6b_CfEWWWgsW177bbp3bE1CuTeYiubgR5_gZXTktkvVWq4SFktTvHXx4HbsAOsPENUtFwTMMwItXYFZ1-35NalsP-E9U9N97wmdv-sYUXlX_U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


HISTORIC DEBT: Federal government debt surpasses $23 trillion for first time as annual deficits once again near $1 trillion (The Hill)

AND YOU THINK THE DEBT’S BAD NOW… In empty warning, liar-Nancy Pelosi claims she’s worried 2020 candidates are on wrong track with healthcare and wealth-tax rackets (Bloomberg)

Government & Politics


GUN-CONFISCATION SPOILER EXITS: Anti-Second Amendment crusader R. Francis socialist-O'Rourke drops out of the presidential race (The New York Times)

THE PROBE THAT NEVER ENDS: First batch of Mueller-probe interview notes involving Rick Gates, Steve Bannon, and Michael Cohen have been released (The Daily Caller

RUSE SHUT DOWN: Rep. Jim Jordan rejects whistleblower’s offer to provide written answers to GOP questions (Fox News)

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: scumbag/liar-nObama-appointed judge blocks healthcare rule for immigrants (The Daily Caller)

DEREGULATION: EPA rolling back scumbag/liar-nObama-era anti-coal regulation (The Daily Signal)

National Security


DHS CHIEF: Trump names Chad Wolf acting DHS secretary (Townhall)

PUBLIC DEFIANCE: Iran announces new nuke-deal violations during commemoration of 1979 U.S. embassy seizure (Fox News)

SEPARATING WHEAT FROM CHAFF: Thousands of migrants sent back to Mexico under Trump policy have given up their asylum claims (Fox News)

NO PERMANENT FIX: Smugglers are sawing through new sections of Trump’s border wall (The Washington Post)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: The dinky/liar-Warren plan to paper over the costs of Medicare for All (E21)

POLICY: How the Left is weaponizing cancel culture to politicize children’s books (The Federalist)

HUMOR: socialist-Beto drops out of race to spend more time taking guns from his family (The Babylon Bee)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/66548?mailing_id=4629&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4629&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
Steve Bannon -vs- Maria Bartiromo
lleB3NGa_-vFcFTqyUYaa-4Z3vjgIyU6qIuvKig17PKcwFZuJih9UHFH1ldltRmi2T7yYxvN_61dSmQe9CEExYRHtEYZFtAJ9SHbczoxJbgtajBhLT_Q33kjxQQhAWyMfd3GSZtUXnSQtuiePABzNT8khP-TMA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Steve Bannon appears on Fox News to discuss the ongoing impeachment issues with Maria Bartiromo... Within the discussion Bannon highlights the larger position about how Trump’ America-First foreign policy is antithetical to the one-way interventionist model that ultimately provides U.S. politicians with a process to sell their office to the benefit of foreign governments. The loode lips liar-Biden-Ukraine issue is a direct example of that process. Everything about POTUS Trump’s policy is against the business model that allows DC politicians to trade U.S. foreign policy for their own financial benefit. Trillions at stake. Bannon correctly points out that only public pressure is going to force change upon the swamp. President Trump is a vessel for a process to stop DC corruption; but the DC politicians themselves will never vote to diminish their own interests. That’s the issue with the republicans in the Senate during an impeachment trial. On the Democrat race I agree with Bannon on 90% of his presentation, except I would replace “centrist” with Wall St multinationals and Hollywood. The Dem party is fueled by multinational interests and Hollywood support that is aligned with China and multinationals et al. With loose lips liar-Biden falling they are trying Buttigieg; if that doesn’t work, they’ll need someone to hold/protect their interests.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/sunday-talks-steve-bannon-vs-maria-bartiromo/  
.
Trump's Russia ambassador pick breaks 
with him over Ukraine phone call
bGwjD5mME-BY9-sboAK3PycWQL-O33H_Ua8y3DAnO-wvKYSErwJS-pU9JPavWg743ZtA-gn4rwvN_QMCbNG3cAv43YoM9junr-0BZKD9CfZ-XWyms1h1rwef1F4LJT-iai4bA5LHbcmEBF18RAZuGkUIklMDqBw1xp7Gy_yBE0FmKteaqT9ul9WQppGvZkwen0nCRKHqoTTPutHS1EV6bqgQ_UH6MHIyM3s0esQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By NAHAL TOOSI 
{ politico.com } ~ Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan implicitly broke with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, telling lawmakers that it would not be “in accord with our values”... for a president to ask a foreign government to investigate a political rival. Sullivan was speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which is vetting his nomination as the next U.S. ambassador to Russia. His appearance has offered Senate Democrats a rare chance to quiz a top Trump administration official on issues related to the House-led impeachment inquiry into Trump — and they took full advantage. Sullivan was grilled in particular by New Jersey Sen. scumbag-Robert Menendez, the committee’s ranking Democrat, on impeachment-related topics, including the propriety of what Trump is accused of doing: pressuring Ukraine’s government to investigate a political rival, former vice president loose lips liar-Joe Biden. On that aspect, Sullivan was fairly direct. “Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent — I don’t think that would be in accord with our values,” he said. But at certain points, Sullivan also said that his understanding of a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukraine’s president, in which Trump repeatedly asked Ukraine to investigate loose lips liar-Biden, was that it was part of broader U.S. concerns about ending corruption in Ukraine. The president has “denied that there was any quid pro quo,” Sullivan noted. Throughout his testimony, Sullivan frequently reverted to what scumbag-Menendez criticized as a “see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil” approach, basically stating that he was unaware of much of what was happening involving Ukraine policy...  https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/30/john-sullivan-ukraine-phone-call-061694   
.
 Brit Hume exposes 'huge fallacy' in Alexander Vindman's testimony to House
impeachment panel  
OYBpKOmoMNpj9Z6TwJuJG4StbcWY5GeP_pQ8RE6fBwknWe3kuU7iv3y4tSISJNVclTZeLEysk3BSJxCW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Chris Enloe
{ theblaze.com } ~ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was "deeply troubled" by what he believed were President Donald Trump's attempts to "subvert U.S. foreign policy,"... the Washington Post reported Friday, citing Vindman's testimony given to the Democrat-led House impeachment inquiry last week.   [Vindman] told lawmakers that he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy and an improper attempt to coerce a foreign government into investigating a U.S. citizen.  Vindman's testimony received widespread attention because it furthered the narrative that Trump is a rogue president determined to act out of self-interest, rather than in the interest of the American people. But according to Fox News' Brit Hume, there is a "huge fallacy" in Vindman's line-of-thinking. That fallacy, Hume went on to explain, is that Trump cannot "subvert" U.S. foreign policy precisely because he is the "constitutional author of foreign policy."  "Actually, it's the fact that the president is the constitutional author of foreign policy, so the idea he is 'subverting' it is illogical," Hume explained. Indeed, as the Constitutional Rights Foundation explains, the executive branch has the most significant role in crafting U.S. foreign policy, and because the president is the head of the executive branch, the president essentially determines the direction of U.S. foreign policy while in office.   https://www.theblaze.com/news/brit-hume-exposes-huge-fallacy-in-alexander-vindmans-testimony-to-house-impeachment-panel?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202019-11-03&utm_term=TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM%20-%20last%20270%20days  
.
Liz Cheney Demands liar-Pelosi Immediately 
Publish Impeachment Transcripts -NOW!
T4vO354lV8LXlcL02ODwVxhzB8NxenMaRwqeGB_g6vvJVZ3NpW5t0KTavb4yVfppYUj3ZdfqiNh-4QDsHSHhhb52b5_AozsvyAtXUPb7nBzWlnHJyQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jeff Dunetz
{ lidblog.com } ~ The GOP is sick and tired of the Congressional Democrats’ games.  The entire process has legitimately been described as a “sham,” a “hoax,” and a “witch hunt,”... thanks to the secretive and clandestine nature of the Democrats’ work. Now, that the non-impeachment impeachment “resolution” has passed the House on a partisan basis,  the #3 person in the Republican caucus, Liz Cheney demanded that transcripts of all previous witness interviews be made public unredacted right now! On Friday, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) sent a letter to House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi demanding that she release the full transcripts of all depositions in the Trump impeachment inquiry and demanded the end to the selective leaking of documents to the media. But Liz, scumbag-Adam Schiff needs to leak like humans need to breathe air. Cheney wrote in a letter to liar-Pelosi.  “Despite the vote in the House on October 31, House Democrats continue to conduct the partisan effort to impeach the President in secret.  Your duty to the Constitution and the American people, as well as fundamental fairness, requires that you immediately release the full transcripts of all depositions taken since you pronounced the beginning of an impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019,” “The selective leaking in which the House Intelligence Committee has been engaged must end immediately and the full and complete record must be provided for the American people to see.” “In addition, to the extent that you make any redactions in any of the transcripts, all Members of the House must be supplied copies of the full and unredacted transcripts,”...   https://lidblog.com/liz-cheney-demanded-transcripts/   
scumbag/'liar-nObama-Appointed
Judge Blocks Trump’s Health Care Rule For Immigrants
tPNJj0rQMarycEEcIZOElMmc7RpV8NqdjLvM3mJtdRhjTNKhMzyTW97VfI6LaWtVFag6AOH8q0YJgepqliKBYCvd2tmdvhH2U5_zvW5ITkAh82f7MjJpxQhLc1Vu7j6WNc4j4f_lVN4_ZwlSJRwDDnpr_pJSDdrtWY1_h1A8mfn0h1tAJm2pLMq7Z1VhPRmSp-9JkAvFhCqDLK1zcU5QUFvHN9ig1jsaZOo2V9vJVx9JEjWJ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by JASON HOPKINS
{ dailycaller.com } ~ A federal judge has, at least temporarily, blocked the Trump administration from implementing a rule that would require immigrants prove... that they have health insurance or can afford to pay for it. Judge Michael Simon of the federal district court in Portland, Oregon, issued a nationwide temporary restraining order Saturday, barring President Donald Trump from implementing his health care requirement for foreign nationals applying for legal permanent status. Trump issued a presidential proclamation in early October that called on immigrants applying for green cards to be able to prove that they can obtain health insurance within 30 days of entering the U.S. or otherwise demonstrate that they can afford their own medical care. The order was intended to be the administration’s latest effort to bar migration from low-income aliens and further transition the government to a more merit-based immigration system. “Immigrants who enter this country should not further saddle our healthcare system, and subsequently American taxpayers, with higher costs,” the presidential proclamation read.  “Continuing to allow entry into the United States of certain immigrants who lack health insurance or the demonstrated ability to pay for their healthcare would be detrimental to these interests.” The proclamation, which was supposed to go into effect Sunday, would have applied to visa applicants living abroad — not immigrants already living stateside. It also would not have affected refugees, asylum-seekers or children. Health care obtained under scumbag/liar-nObamacare does not reach the threshold of the order. If implemented, the new policy is expected to dramatically cut the number of green card applications seen every year. A Migration Policy Institute study found that 57% of U.S. immigrants had private health insurance in 2017, according to The Associated Press, and 30% were covered under public health insurance...   https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/03/judge-blocks-immigrant-health-care-rule/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=10779   
Depoliticize and disinfect federal judges
Ae7ubJHXsRqVuk_xatHLTyYHWiPSOOIYZMZYUIVGDrcLBdQX_p9HGlUnJffP0g19Co6fAPipZSFwe82KbaS0LfNTQMXYqkqJie5SVCQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= By Larry Klayman
{ wnd.com } ~ The chief justice of the Supreme Court, the ever leftist-oriented John Roberts, many months ago strongly criticized President Trump for speaking plainly about the biases and political inclinations of federal judges... The president's criticism came in response to a ruling by the Honorable Jon Tigar, an scumbag/liar-nObama appointee on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, perhaps the most openly leftist of all district courts in the United States – and that says a lot given the makeup of most lower federal courts, particularly in the District of Columbia. Judge Tigar, who is the son of far-left activist attorney Michael Tigar, who not coincidentally intervened in the 9th Circuit case involving my client Sheriff Joe Arpaio, arguing that the sheriff's pardon should be nullified, had just issued injunctive relief thwarting the administration's asylum policy to limit rampant illegal immigration. After Trump simply pointed out that another scumbag/liar-nObama judge had ruled against him, Chief Justice Roberts issued this pubic statement: "We do not have scumbag/liar-nObama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or scumbag/liar-Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for." Adam Liptak, "Chief Justice Defends Judicial Independence After Trump Attacks 'scumbag/liar-nObama Judge,'" New York Times, Nov. 21, 2018. Roberts' ridiculous defense of the political and other biases inherent in the federal judiciary is dishonest, and it is why conservatives and many others have lost confidence in the chief justice, who might just as well be head of the Supreme Court on Pluto. Even the left and its Fake News Media know that federal court rulings in cases that involve or even touch on politics, or social issues like abortion, usually go along partisan lines. That is why the media of all political bents generally make reference to which president, Democrat or Republican, appointed a federal judge to the bench. I have said many times, including in my autobiography, "Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment!" that one can predict with great certainty how a federal judge is likely to rule based on the political party of the president who appointed him or her. There are exceptions, but not many, and when there is an exception, its usually for other reasons, such as a judge not wanting to rule in favor of a party that is controversial, such as with many of my clients. Here, a federal judge may not want to be seen siding with a party who has been smeared heavily by the media or elsewhere, lest he or she also then be smeared for ruling in that party's favor. Again, there are exceptions, but very few. Yesterday, two rulings came down from the most politicized federal district court in the United States, short of Judge Jon Tigar's one in San Francisco, ruling against my clients Dr. Jerome Corsi and Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The two rulings, dismissing their cases, were largely the result of these extra-judicial currents and forces...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Why the Economic Slowdown?
wVrc06WmmeuMxlc3BjgyNgJslojQmiWOB8I_14e7KCMxsydFqggtlHYNwuFYwQzO_LzSdtJP25vg8_qwJFo4-afA4tEUaSXS0sQdTpbFIH--XFJ4zUjwfxFQpb2PMZCYApGlG9ZWjzHlhdA7gNMQDtlDtq_S6vA6e_d1-HQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  The economy may be slowing a bit, according to the latest GDP numbers showing growth of just 1.9% in the third quarter. Yesterday’s White House announcement says it’s good news, though notably without using the number 1.9: “The current economic expansion, which began roughly a decade ago, became the longest in U.S. history on July 1, 2019, beating the previous record that lasted from March 1991 through March 2001. As today’s advance Gross Domestic Product (GDP) release confirms, economic growth continued in the third quarter of 2019, beating market expectations and adding to the expansion’s record length. The release also confirms that the Trump Administration’s policies support sustained economic growth and lead to higher incomes for American families. … Furthermore, under President scumbag/liar-nObama’s expansion period, real GDP grew at only a 2.2 percent annual rate compared to the Trump Administration’s 2.6 percent rate.”

There’s a lot to unpack in that statement. While it’s important to note that no president truly controls the economy or is solely responsible for its growth or stagnation, Barack scumbag/liar-nObama oversaw the slowest recovery in history. It was slow because of his Big Government “stimulus” and massive regulation, all of which very nearly brought another recession in 2015 and 2016. By the way, the whole reason for the recession that began under George W. Bush was Democrat housing policies put it place a decade prior.

Candidate Trump talked a big game about the economy, and as president he has in many ways delivered. Record-low unemployment and solid wage gains for workers are in part spurred by his significant deregulation and across-the-board tax cuts, as is GDP that finally reached 3% for the first time in a decade.

So, why the lackluster GDP growth lately? For one thing, full employment is great for workers, but it’s harder to grow a business when there aren’t many workers to add and retaining the ones you have costs more money. (Tomorrow’s unemployment report will reveal more.)

And then there’s the elephant in the room. As National Review notes, “The lackluster numbers come amid concerns that the economy is slowing down as trade battles with China and other countries continue to burden American companies and consumers.”

The Wall Street Journal also blames the slowdown on Trump’s tariffs. “The strong evidence is that trade policy is the main growth culprit. U.S. manufacturing has slumped, which is related to slowing exports. Slower growth in China from the trade war has reduced the exports of U.S. farm, industrial and construction equipment,” says the Journal. (Manufacturing is now the smallest share of the economy in 72 years.) “A study by Federal Reserve economists this year looked at two waves of trade policy ‘shock,’ first in 2018 and then in the first half of 2019, and estimated the impact reduced GDP growth by about one percentage point.”

While not arguing for Trump’s tariffs, we have endeavored to explain his strategy in a trade war that he did not start. In short, he’s using a strong economy as leverage to correct a lot of long-term trade abuse by other nations, and we think Rust Belt voters are among those who are grateful that someone is finally fighting for the U.S. instead of for the globalists. Whether Trump’s strategy pays off is yet to be determined.

Are there economic warning signs? Yes, but caveat emptor: Democrats and the Leftmedia would love to undermine consumer confidence by playing up those signs. Maintaining perspective is incredibly important.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66470?mailing_id=4623&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4623&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…