The Tradesman's Posts (202)

Sort by
This is an interesting read and a plausible way to get back to how our founder's wanted the government to function...... It appears that our supposed leaders have bastardized our government's scope and purpose!!!!!  SO HOW DO WE GET BACK ON TRACK??????
 
You said:
what type of government did our founding fathers set up and how was it supposed to work?
 
ChatGPT said:

The Founding Fathers of the United States established a constitutional republic with a federal system of government. It was designed to balance power, protect individual rights, and prevent tyranny—whether by a monarch, a majority, or a small elite. Here’s a breakdown of the system they created and how it was supposed to work:


1. Constitutional Republic

  • Definition: A form of government in which officials are chosen by the people and must govern according to a written constitution that limits the powers of government and protects individual rights.

  • The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1788, is the supreme law of the land. It outlines the structure of government and guarantees certain rights to citizens (later expanded with the Bill of Rights in 1791).


2. Federalism

  • Definition: A system that divides power between a central (national) government and state governments.

  • Certain powers (like printing money or declaring war) belong to the federal government.

  • Other powers (like education and local law enforcement) are reserved to the states.

  • Some powers are shared (e.g., taxation).


3. Separation of Powers

The national government is divided into three branches to avoid concentration of power:

Legislative Branch (Congress)

  • Makes laws

  • Bicameral system:

    • House of Representatives: based on population.

    • Senate: two senators per state, regardless of size.

  • Intended to be the most directly representative of the people (especially the House).

Executive Branch (President)

  • Enforces laws

  • Elected by the Electoral College, not directly by the people.

  • Commander-in-chief of the military, negotiates treaties, appoints officials (with Senate approval).

Judicial Branch (Supreme Court and other federal courts)

  • Interprets laws

  • Determines if laws or executive actions are constitutional.

  • Judges have life tenure to protect them from political pressure.


4. Checks and Balances

Each branch has powers that can check the others, maintaining a balance:

  • Congress can impeach the president or judges.

  • The president can veto legislation.

  • The courts can strike down laws or executive actions.


5. Republicanism

  • Citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, rather than direct democracy.

  • Intended to protect against mob rule while still honoring the will of the people.


6. Protection of Individual Rights

  • The Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) ensures freedoms like speech, religion, due process, and protection from government overreach.

  • Later amendments expanded these rights (e.g., abolishing slavery, guaranteeing women’s suffrage).


Founders' Intentions

The Founders feared tyranny from:

  • centralized monarchy (like Britain’s King George III),

  • faction or mob dominating unchecked,

  • Or even from government itself if not limited.

They intended a system where:

  • Government power is limited and accountable,

  • Citizens have sovereignty through elections,

  • Minority rights are protected,

  • And laws, not individuals, rule the land.


If you'd like, I can show how this structure compares to modern U.S. government practice—or explore how different founders (like Madison, Jefferson, or Hamilton) had slightly different visions for how it should work.

 
You said:
show me the comparison
 
ChatGPT said:

Here’s a clear comparison between how the Founding Fathers designed the U.S. government versus how it often functions today—highlighting key intentions and how things have evolved or diverged over time:


⚖️ 1. Separation of Powers & Checks and Balances

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Three branches (legislative, executive, judicial) would check each other’s power to prevent tyranny.Checks still exist, but partisan gridlock or cooperation can undermine true balance (e.g., Congress rarely checks presidents from its own party).
Congress was intended to be the most powerful branch, especially the House as closest to the people.The executive branch has grown in power, especially through executive orders, military actions without formal declarations of war, and federal agencies.
 

🏛️ 2. Federalism (Division of State and National Powers)

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Clear division of power: states would handle local matters; the federal government would handle national ones.Federal power has expanded dramatically (via the Commerce Clause, Supreme Court decisions, federal funding with strings attached). States still have power, but often must comply with federal standards.
States were called "laboratories of democracy" to try different solutions.Still true in some areas (e.g., marijuana laws, education policy), but uniformity is often pushed at the federal level.
 

🗳️ 3. Representation and Democracy

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Republic, not a direct democracy—citizens elect representatives to make informed decisions.Still true, but constant media and polling pressures lead many politicians to act based on popularity or party loyalty, not deliberation.
Electoral College to choose president, not by direct vote. Intended as a filter against demagoguery.Electoral College remains, but it’s controversial—presidents can win without a popular vote majority (e.g., 2000, 2016). Critics argue it undermines democratic legitimacy.
Senators originally appointed by state legislatures to represent state interests.Now directly elected (17th Amendment, 1913), which made the Senate more democratic—but also less focused on state governments’ needs.
 

🧾 4. Role of Political Parties

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Founders (especially Washington) warned against political factions (parties), fearing they would divide the country.Strong two-party system dominates. Partisan loyalty often outweighs policy debate or compromise, and elections focus more on party power than national unity.
Intended politics to be issue- and principle-based, not tribal.Increasing partisan polarization affects everything from judicial appointments to basic legislation.
 

🏛️ 5. Judicial Branch

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Designed to be independent and impartial, interpreting the Constitution free from politics.Judges are still independent by structure (life tenure), but nominations and confirmations have become highly political, especially at the Supreme Court level.
Courts were to be interpreters, not makers, of law.The Supreme Court often plays a decisive role in national policy (e.g., abortion, healthcare, civil rights), which makes it a political battleground.
 

📜 6. Individual Rights

Founders' DesignModern Reality
Bill of Rights protects free speech, religion, due process, etc.Still foundational, but modern issues (technology, surveillance, gun rights, social media, etc.) create new tensions over interpretation.
Rights were mainly protected from government intrusion.Today, debates extend to private platforms, corporations, and how to balance safety with freedom.
 

🧠 Summary: How It’s Evolved

AreaStill Matches Founders’ IntentHas Drifted
Separation of Powers✓ Partially✓ Executive power expanded
Federalism✓ Some state power✓ Stronger federal government
Representation✓ Republic maintained✓ Electoral College & Senate reform altered dynamics
Individual Rights✓ Core rights protected✓ New challenges (e.g., digital privacy)
Political Culture✗ Deeply partisan✗ Far from original warnings about factionalism
 
 ONCE AGAIN..... HOW DO WE TURN THIS SHIP AROUND AND GET BACK ON TRACK?????
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOW TO GET BACK ON TRACK — Key Focus Areas

1. 🗳️ Revive Civic Education and Participation

The Problem: Most citizens don’t know how government works—or that they have real power.

The Solution:

  • Educate ourselves and others about the Constitution, checks and balances, federalism, etc.

  • Engage locally: School boards, city councils, and state legislatures are where change begins.

  • Support nonpartisan civics programs in schools and communities.

  • Cultivate civil dialogue: respectful disagreement, not tribal warfare.

“A well-instructed people alone can be permanently a free people.” —James Madison


2. ⚖️ Restore Balance Between the Branches

The Problem: Congress has surrendered power to the President and bureaucracy.

The Solution:

  • Pressure elected officials to reclaim Congressional authority (especially over war powers and spending).

  • Support candidates (regardless of party) who believe in restoring balance, not expanding executive control.

  • End abuse of emergency powers and executive orders as legislative shortcuts.


3. 🏛️ Reinforce Federalism

The Problem: States have become dependent on federal funds and direction.

The Solution:

  • Elect state leaders who stand up for state sovereignty, not just follow federal mandates.

  • Encourage innovation at the state level (education, healthcare, criminal justice).

  • Re-examine federal overreach (e.g. regulatory agencies creating de facto laws).


4. 🔍 Rein in the Bureaucratic State

The Problem: Unelected agencies wield enormous power with little accountability.

The Solution:

  • Support regulatory reform—Congress must reclaim its lawmaking role.

  • Demand transparency and accountability from federal agencies.

  • Enforce the nondelegation doctrine (the idea that Congress can’t hand off its power indefinitely).


5. 🧑‍⚖️ Depoliticize the Courts

The Problem: Judges are seen as political actors rather than neutral interpreters of law.

The Solution:

  • Appoint and support constitutional originalists who respect the limits of judicial power.

  • Oppose court-packing or judicial activism from either side.

  • Encourage reforms like term limits or age caps, if necessary, to ensure fresh perspectives without politicizing the bench.


6. 🔄 Fix the Electoral and Party System

The Problem: Two-party control and gerrymandering stifle new voices and local representation.

The Solution:

  • Push for reforms like ranked-choice votingopen primaries, or independent redistricting commissions.

  • Encourage third-party or independent candidates to inject new ideas.

  • Demand campaign finance transparency—follow the money, reduce undue influence.


7. 🤝 Revive Civic Virtue and National Unity

The Problem: Polarization and cynicism are eroding the social fabric.

The Solution:

  • Promote service over slogans: local volunteerism, military, Peace Corps, faith-based action.

  • Rebuild trust by engaging with people who disagree—neighbors, not enemies.

  • Refocus patriotism on principles, not partisanship.


🧭 Founders' Advice for Today

“A republic, if you can keep it.” —Benjamin Franklin
“The people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government.” —James Madison
“The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.” —Thomas Jefferson


✅ Actionable First Steps

  1. Read the Constitution and the Federalist Papers (esp. Nos. 10, 51, 78).

  2. Attend local government meetings—city council, school board, state legislature.

  3. Educate others—start a discussion group or civic class.

  4. Vote in primaries, not just general elections.

  5. Support reform-minded candidates, regardless of party.


If you want, I can help you:  (I stopped here)

  • Draft a community action plan

  • Create civic education materials

  • Identify reform proposals that are gaining traction

Would you like to explore one of those next?

Read more…

Israel v. Iran

Source; Anonymous

neo-liberals are ideological and emotional in their approach, rather than being realistic and assessing forces and recognizing that making the perfect the enemy of the good or trying to have everything that they want all at once is going to be counterproductive.  

Up to this point, Israel has received a great deal of U.S. aid; it’s going to continue to receive a great deal more. If the antiwar position or the non-interventionist position is we can’t do anything until we cut Israel loose and remove any kind of support from Israel, then we basically have a politically impossible position, because the amount of support the American people have for Israel as a whole is much greater than the amount of support the American people have for our joining Israel’s air force in bombing Iran or certainly having American boots go on the ground to undertake regime change and an occupation of Iran. And do you think Americans are less supportive of Israel in the midst of a war than they were of Ukraine?

The U.S. has not yet directly intervened in an offensive capacity against Iran. But Trump seems on the verge of doing so. As such, Trump has gotten a lot of pushback for letting a major Mideast war begin on his watch. Some even accuse him of betraying the America 1st movement and joining forces to fight a war on Israel’s behalf. Some say Israel’s attack on Iran is all Trump’s fault, that this attack could not possibly have happened without Trump giving his assent to it, and therefore, this war is our war. As I stated above, those people ideologically want to have their predictions fulfilled. That’s taking on a nightmare scenario, and it’s actually abandoning the responsibility we have to look at each step of this situation. America has a choice every step of the way and can back down or choose not to be involved at any point.

The basic fact of the Israel–Iran war is that Israel is much stronger than its opponent. And that the U.S. is already deeply involved in the conflict. Israel is attacking Iran using U.S.-supplied munitions. America repositioned forces in the region to thwart Iran’s retaliatory strikes. Without our significant and ongoing military support, Israel wouldn't be in a position to win this war. Does that mean that we should get more involved because the war is made possible by what we’ve already done? Does it mean that we should not make efforts at staying out, and calling at least for peace? Should we abandon all hope of having an end to the war, of calling for an end to the war, of staying out of adding more force to it because of what we’ve already done?

No!  Non-interventionists should fight the battles they can win, and be skeptical of despairing over battles that frankly have already been lost.

There’s already a big push to get Trump to bomb Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, because Israel is unable to take them out, meaning it needs our bunker busters and B-2 bombers. And there’s the risk that U.S. forces and assets will be targeted or maybe incidentally hit by Iranian strikes, which would likely trigger our escalated involvement. And there's also the simple matter that Israel is a small country, and if ballistic missiles are raining down on it, we might want to enter the war directly to prevent Israel from resorting to nuclear weapons.

But history shows how very, very wrong predictions have been, even by the experts.There were an awful lot of neo-liberals who said, after Trump assassinated Iranian military officer qasem soleimani that this was going to lead basically to World War III, that this was going to lead to all sorts of unrest in the Middle East, that Iran was going to retaliate against us—none of which actually happened, or at least, not to the degree that it had been predicted. And even before that, neo-libs were saying the same thing about moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem in Israel and in terms of threat inflation. Those outlooks were based on emotional, ideological preferences.

The war itself is sort of verifying the logic of both of the belligerents. There are ballistic missiles coming from Iran, and blowing up apartment buildings throughout Israel. And the Israelis are saying if one of those ballistic missiles had a nuclear warhead, we would be screwed. Israel is such a small country and a compact country that, even if it has a 2nd strike capability the amount of damage that Israel as a compact country could receive from a handful of Iranian nuclear weapons in the event of an apocalyptic showdown greatly exceeds the amount of damage that Israeli 2nd-strike capabilities could conceivably inflict on a vastly larger Iranian land mass with a population of 85 million. So, all those calculations make the Israelis very, very keen to defang an Iran, who daily does all it can to annihilate Israel, and to remove any possibility of an Iranian nuclear program. As for the Iranians, it's absolutely clear that Iran wants to have a nuclear weapon. That's a realist outlook that says both of these belligerents are going to keep at it because they both have rational grounds for what they’re doing. Obviously, the amount of pain that they’re both inflicting on one another is also a calculation that has to be factored in.

And there’s also the question of the danger for both of these states that something is going to change with respect to outside powers. The Iranians are certainly worried that America will get in. As for the Israelis, the reason they are free to have a war with Iran is because they're not in grave danger of having a war with their Arab neighbors. But that could change if the Arabs become more sympathetic to Iran and less sympathetic to Israel, that would open the possibility for Israel of facing a multi-front war, which would be an extremely dangerous position for them.

So, that actually gives both Iran and Israel an incentive, both in terms of the pain they’re experiencing right now from the mutual blows and also from the possibility that the international situation is going to change, to start talking to one another and to try to resolve this very difficult logical problem. It’s not as if they both want to continue this tit-for-tat indefinitely, or that they can do so.


Supplemental Info:
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-special-report-june-17-2025-evening-edition

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/heres-how-much-damage-israel-has-done-to-irans-nuclear-program-5874235?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2025-06-17&src_cmp=gv-2025-06-17&utm_medium=email&est=xe3HhYO%2BBgNWE%2BGynMKnuRKjSD0y8Z3YsEQJJHDTvFwvE0c8Gl3MAFQuXnru

What a US Strike on Iran's Fordow Enrichment Facility Would Mean for Tehran's Nuclear Program

Read more…

The Cloward-Piven Exploitation Strategy

The cloward–piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists richard cloward and frances fox piven. The strategy aims to utilize militant so-called anti-poverty groups to facilitate a political crisis by overloading the welfare system via an increase in welfare claims, forcing the creation of a system of guaranteed minimum income and redistributing income through the federal government. cloward and piven were 2 neo-liberal Columbia professors who outlined their plan to turn America into Cuba or the Soviet Union. They published their manifesto in the leftist publication, The Nation, in 1966. Note the words “militant,” “crisis,” and “overloading.”

Supplemental info:


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/06/the_summer_of_cloward_piven.html

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/17/documents-show-biden-admin-ginned-up-fbi-investigations-of-law-abiding-political-opponents/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=documents-show-biden-admin-ginned-up-fbi-investigations-of-law-abiding-political-opponents&utm_term=2025-06-17

 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/over-98-of-americans-ignore-no-kings-tired-tantrum 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6374143863112

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/16/as-deportations-rise-the-u-s-is-on-track-for-the-lowest-murder-rate-on-record/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=as-deportations-rise-the-u-s-is-on-track-for-the-lowest-murder-rate-on-record&utm_term=2025-06-16


https://spectator.org/democrats-talk-only-to-themselves-on-immigration/

https://www.newsmax.com/debrajsaunders/immgratin-protests-los-angeles/2025/06/12/id/1214639/


https://www.glennbeck.com/glenn-beck/tax-dollars-fund-marxist-riots?utm_campaign=post-teaser&utm_content=1m7mk1rs


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2025/06/12/is-this-newsoms-most-pathetic-move-yet-n2658679  


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/06/12/marlow-padilla-trying-to-bait-law-enforcement-did-not-comply-with-officers-not-wearing-security-pin/


https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/13/heres-how-the-media-are-lying-right-now-alex-padilla-just-asking-a-question-edition/

https://www.newsmax.com/us/trump-ice-deportations/2025/06/15/id/1215077/

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/schumer-requests-600k-in-taxpayer-funds-for-left-wing-group-accused-of-training-illegal-immigrants-to-avoid-ice/ 
 
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/transportation-secretary-duffy-announces-agency-wont-fund-damage

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6374210613112


https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/12/california-never-the-homeland-of-mexican-invaders/


The Irony and Absurdity of ‘Stolen Land’ Virtue Signaling - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

 
Read more…

Screwed by Social Security!

In the 1960's President Lyndon B. Johnson was fighting 2 very expensive wars simultaneously; the war in Vietnam and The War on Poverty also known as the great society.


Needing money for that, LBJ merged the Social Security Trust Fund with the unified budget process. In plain English, democrat lbLBJ stripped out all the considerable cash in the Social Security Trust Fund and replaced it with government IOUs (bonds, as we know them). That system exists to this day.  In algore’s words, he robbed the lock-box!

So, LBJ lost the war in Vietnam, the War on Poverty and the huge cache of cash in the Social Security Trust Fund. And what was the result of that leadership by our Democrat President and his Party? The breakup of the family, a dramatic increase in crime, a "poverty caste" and, Social Security "running out of money."

So, in 1984, high income families started paying income taxes on 50% of their Social Security income. In 1994 that was increased to 85%, subject to taxation at the taxpayer’s usual federal income tax rate. And once adding the disabled to Social Security made a lot of sense, and sensibility. Then the politicians and bureaucrats, as they always do to increase their power, broadening benefits. Things went from "unable to work" to "unable to work at the last job you held." In other words, an injured police officer could get benefits for life, even if he was perfectly capable of doing a desk job. Many very capable people have since gone from work to benefits.

Elon Musk and his Dept of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have targeted Social Security files for auditing, to let the country know if there is, or isn't, any fraud or waste. The left-wing/democrats, lying--AGAIN (and again, and again, and again...etc)--say Musk/Trump want to take stop Social Security, have gone to their left-wing judges to shut down that effort. Apparently they support and want more fraud and waste. That’s where it currently stands.

So why everyone wouldn’t support DOGE’s efforts?  If there are improprieties, we need to know about them and immediately take corrective action. If there are no improprieties, better yet. Just tell us! We can all celebrate together. Indeed, clean Social Security files can serve as an oasis of unity in our very divided nation.

But preliminary reviews of Social Security files have raised a few questions. There are literally millions of "accounts" with beneficiaries over the age of 100; an impossibility. Of course, that, in and of itself, is not proof of fraud. It does however hint of carelessness, ineptness and incompleteness. Again, apparently what neo-liberals/democrats support and want more of.

America is entitled to a "clean" audit, with equally clean audit results! The Social Security administration is entitled to state-of-the-art computer systems. File storage needs to be electronic, not in mountain caves --- literally. Will obstructionist left-wing/democrat judiciary prevail much longer? Shouldn't our country,with Lincoln's government "by the people, of the people and for the people" get its deserved transparency?

Hands on Social Security!

Supplemental Info:
https://heartland.org/opinion/brenton-smith-social-securitys-clock-is-ticking-why-its-not-getting-fixed/

https://dailyhodl.com/2025/06/04/ray-dalio-says-america-is-going-broke-warns-us-facing-emerging-problem-of-rising-debt-and-interest-costs/ 

 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/04/ohios-apparent-medicaid-fraud-is-exactly-why-congress-must-increase-medicaid-scrutiny/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ohios-apparent-medicaid-fraud-is-exactly-why-congress-must-increase-medicaid-scrutiny&utm_term=2025-06-04

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/watchdog-finds-billions-potential-savings-medicare-head-start-reforms

Read more…

Source; https://capoliticalnewsandviews.com/britton-the-right-stuff-it-is-time-for-an-intervention/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=britton-the-right-stuff-it-is-time-for-an-intervention 

Once again a great activist has turned into a writer.  Colleen Britton works tirelessly to support, organize and promote activism in Sacramento and Northern California.  She understands the need for immediate action.

“They boast about protecting minorities, yet democrats fail to protect families and religious minorities. They continually look the other way and ignore anti-Semitic rhetoric and violent behavior calling it protected speech. Their “mostly peaceful demonstrations” almost always end in chaos, lawlessness and violence against law enforcement.

Democrats identify as the party of science. “Trust the science” they say yet they deny basic biology 101. Choosing a pronoun is not changing your sex. They refuse to objectively examine any conflicting research in multiple scientific areas including biology, medicine, climate, and more. That’s not science. It’s ideology.”

The first step in being an effective activist is to be informed about the issues.  This article goes to the heart of the Democrat Party problems:  HYPOCRISY AND HATE.

The Right Stuff: It is time for an intervention

Colleen Britton, Daily Republic,  6/15/25  https://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/the-right-stuff-it-is-time-for-an-intervention/article_aee64ee8-0eb3-47d0-90dc-3cc043c1c827.html

Like rats bailing off a sinking ship, democrats are quickly distancing themselves from the failures of the Democratic Party and the past administration.

Last week, Karine Jean-Pierre, Biden’s White House press secretary, said she’s no longer a Democrat. This is rich coming from the very spokesperson of the president only months after leaving office.

What’s happening? Democratic voters find themselves disoriented, disheartened, disillusioned and suffering from dysphoria: a profound state of unease or dissatisfaction.

I believe it’s called cognitive dissonance: a state of mental discomfort experienced when a person’s beliefs, attitudes or values are inconsistent with their actions or new information.

That new information includes reality, truth and facts that democrats find hard to reconcile. What are some of their beliefs, attitudes, and values? How are they inconsistent with reality, truth, facts and their past actions?

On several major issues such as open borders, deporting undocumented criminals, supporting law enforcement, and others, democrats find their position outnumbered by a vast majority of Americans by ratios as high as 80 /20.

Democratic leaders claim to be the party of the working class yet they continue to promote policies and pass legislation that raises the cost of living including the cost for energy, gas, food, housing, taxes, and more. They focus on generating more revenue for the state and more state control over every aspect of our lives.

They pride themselves on their support for women yet time and again they fail to protect both women and girls. Several bills during this legislative session would have kept males out of women’s facilities and sports. All of these bills were soundly defeated by democrats in committee leaving women and girls vulnerable.

Democrats espouse a belief in free speech yet they silence or shout down any ideas that contradict their own ideological narrative. They refuse to allow conservatives to speak on college campuses – places which should foster the free exchange of ideas. They silence conservatives on air when they present any idea which conflicts with their narrative.

Democratic leaders claim to be the champion of democracy yet we see them thwart the democratic process time and time again. They try to manipulate elections by eliminating certain candidates’ names from ballots. They misuse the justice system by waging law-fare against opponents. Within the California legislature they refuse to allow many Republican sponsored bills to even come up for discussion in committees – let alone a vote. Excluding alternative ideas from discussion is hardly democratic.

They see themselves as creating unity yet their policies like Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, and Critical Race Theory, foster discontent, animosity, and division among individuals, groups in the workplace, communities, and across the country. Democrat leaders want to pigeonhole Americans into small demographic groups which they believe they can control.

They boast about protecting minorities, yet democrats fail to protect families and religious minorities. They continually look the other way and ignore anti-Semitic rhetoric and violent behavior calling it protected speech. Their “mostly peaceful demonstrations” almost always end in chaos, lawlessness and violence against law enforcement.

Democrats identify as the party of science. “Trust the science” they say yet they deny basic biology 101. Choosing a pronoun is not changing your sex. They refuse to objectively examine any conflicting research in multiple scientific areas including biology, medicine, climate, and more. That’s not science. It’s ideology.

They purport to be truth sayers, yet we see them caught in lie after lie – denial after denial. It’s no wonder Democratic voters are in the doldrums. It’s time for some soul searching, self examination, a “look in the mirror.” Ask, “What do I stand for?”

When questioned by democratic friends, offer a helping hand, point them in a direction where they can seek and find truth for themselves. Then welcome them into the real world where everything is questioned and open for discussion

It’s time for an intervention. Resolve the dissonance.

Colleen Britton is a member of the Right Stuff Committee and can be reached at vacatpp@gmail.com.

 
Read more…

One Americans Viewpoint.

LBJ49@LBJ49

I may piss a few of you off by posting this. We can handle it one of two ways: discuss it like adults or you can unfriend me. Your choice. You have your opinion and I have mine. Before anyone gets their panties in a wad, I add that my ancestors came here from other countries, as did most everyone else's ancestors, and they learned the language and worked and never once did I hear any of them trash America. They became citizens, were proud to be one and some served in the military! I am nice to everyone and I have no problem with anyone coming here and making a good life for themselves and their family, BUT if you are coming here and expect us to become what you just came from, then that’s not happening! Return and work on your country and make it better where you can be proud to live in it.
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of AMERICA, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.
“IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT.”
Take it or leave it. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language.
Most Americans believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools.
If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our "culture." We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us. This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this.
But once you are done complaining and whining about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great AMERICAN freedom,
"THE RIGHT TO LEAVE".
If you aren't happy here, then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country that accepted you.
NOTE:
IF we circulate this among ourselves, WE will find the courage to start speaking and voicing the same truths.
If you agree, please SEND THIS ON and as for those who disagree, move to a country that suits you and live there. "
THANK YOU! 🇺🇸
Copy and Paste if you want...I can't be the only American that feels this way...

Read more…

Is This Coming Here?

Is this coming here if the Democrats win future elections? 

The South Australian Legislative Council recently passed the Planning, Development and Infrastructure (Use of Vacant Land) Amendment Bill 2022.
SOUTH AUSTRALIA NEWS

Introduced by the South Australian Greens and "not opposed" by the Labor government "in principle", this Bill seeks to allow the government to take control of privately owned land it deems to be “primarily vacant” and “not being sufficiently used or developed” without paying compensation provided “reasonable steps” have been taken to negotiate with the owner.

The Bill contains no guidance in relation to what constitutes underdeveloped land, nor does it specify how long a landowner has before the government may intervene, yet it provides sweeping powers to seize control of land for loosely defined “public purposes,” including temporary housing.

Worse still, the Bill explicitly exempts the government from paying rent or compensation to landowners.

This socialistic, Big Government approach is typical of Labor and the Greens, and South Australians who are concerned about the future of property rights in this state ought to keep a close eye on how this Bill’s debate in the House of Assembly plays out.

Far from solving the housing crisis, the Bill would have a chilling effect on private investment and development. As the Urban Development Institute of Australia rightly put it, this is “an assault on South Australian property rights.”

Read their response here.

Meanwhile, Labor and the Greens continue to support record-high migration levels, which are placing unprecedented pressure on housing supply.

Rather than address this imbalance with sensible reform, their answer is more government control. It’s strange how problems that the government creates need to be solved with more governmental power.

I will continue to stand up for Australians who believe in the right to own and use their land free from state coercion.

Thank you, as always, for your support.

Yours sincerely,

Alex Antic
Liberal Senator for South
 

About Senator Alex Antic is a Liberal Senator representing South Australia in the Federal Parliament. 

Connect  Email: alex@alexantic.com.au  

Read more…

Source; https://www.mackinac.org/12043

During her 2006 State of the State address, former Gov. Jennifer Granholm predicted that within five years Michigan residents would be "blown away" by the success of the economic plans she was unveiling that night.

Granholm was one of the worst Governors with a budget America ever experienced. Now she has "Blown Away" $93,000,000,000 of our tax dollars. I firmly believe she should be fully investigated by the FBI and a bipartisan Congressional committee to see if she committed any illegality, and to get a detailed list of where every cent of those tax dollars went to. If possible see where the individual "Green businesses" spent the money. If there were any kick backs, everyone involved needs to be prosecuted for everything they can be prosecuted for regardless of who they are and who they are connected to.

 

 

13581685672?profile=RESIZE_584x

Read more…

Block the Merger!

What This Merger Could Mean for Gun Owners


❌ A Bigger, More Powerful ATF: 

The merger would triple the ATF’s budget and quadruple its tactical units, creating a supercharged agency with even less oversight and accountability.

 

 Increased Threats to Your Rights: 

A combined ATF-DEA would have over 10,000 new employees, amplifying the potential for overreach, harassment, and unconstitutional actions against gun owners.

 

❌ A Step Toward Gun Control: 

This isn’t about abolishing the ATF. It’s about empowering it to further infringe on your God-given right to keep and bear arms.

The ATF has a long history of targeting law-abiding Americans, shutting down gun stores for minor clerical errors, surveilling pro-gun communities, and even resorting to violence against citizens. Merging it with the DEA only makes it stronger and harder to hold accountable. 

The ATF-DEA merger could create a larger, more powerful agency hellbent on trampling on our Second Amendment rights.


GOA is fighting to block this merger from becoming a reality, but we’re counting on support from gun rights activists like you to help us stop this dangerous maneuver in its tracks.


Note: You will be able to read the letter in its entirety (and make edits) before adding your name. 


Gun Owners of America / www.gunowners.org / 703-321-8585   

Go to https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=23785  and sign the letter.

Read more…

From Kash

New... I can confirm that the FBI arrested a Chinese national within the United States who allegedly smuggled a dangerous biological pathogen into the country.

The individual, Yunqing Jian, is alleged to have smuggled a dangerous fungus called "Fusarium graminearum," which is an agroterrorism agent, into the U.S. to research at the University of Michigan, where she works.

This fungus can cause a disease called "head blight," a disease of wheat, barley, maize, and rice, causing significant health issues in both humans and livestock. It is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year.

Evidence also indicates Jian had expressed loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party and had received funding from the Chinese government for similar work on this pathogen in China.

Jian’s boyfriend, Zunyong Liu — also charged in the complaint — works at a Chinese university where he conducts research on the same pathogen. Liu is alleged to have first lied, then admitted, to also smuggling Fusarium graminearum into America—through the Detroit Metropolitan Airport—so that he too could conduct research the University of Michigan.

Both individuals have been charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, false statements, and visa fraud.

This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk.

Your FBI will continue working tirelessly to be on guard against it.

Our @FBIDetroit
team did excellent work in this case partnering with @Cbp
.

Justice will be done. 366454636bb77d97f526fea94503b781.jpg?width=568

Read more…

R.E.I.N.S

Source; Anonymous

“It is because democracy holds every public power under public scrutiny and challenges every pretension of wisdom and balances every force with a countervailing force, that some of the injustices which characterize traditional societies, and modern tyrannies, are prevented.”—Reinhold Niebuhr

The good society is one which strives to maintain the greatest possible degree of equilibrium so that various competing powers and interests and truths would check and neutralize one another.  The tens of thousands of new regulations imposed by unaccountable agencies each year negate the above and limit individual liberty and choice in myriad, often unrecognized ways. Regulations are hidden taxes, draining trillions of dollars from individual households and businesses every year, representing the largest single fiscal burden on the economy outside of individual and corporate income taxes.

A sober and honest analysis would describe the provisions as forcing Congress finally to take responsibility for the regulations developed by executive agencies purported as detailed mechanisms executing the laws Congress itself passed. Under the REINS (Regulations of the Executive In Need of Scrutiny Act) provisions, if Congress disagrees with an agency’s interpretation of what a law requires or imposes, Congress’s interpretation will reign supreme, allowing it to block regulations the body disagrees with from becoming the law of the land.

Congress previously gave itself the power to review and block major regulation retroactively for a limited period of time through the Congressional Review Act (CRA) of 1996, but it has rarely used that power, and when it has, its efforts have most often been blocked by a presidential veto. The CRA allowed the House and the Senate to pass resolutions of disapproval to block major regulations. Despite tens of thousands of regulations being enacted in nearly 30 years since the CRA passed, Congress has used it successfully to overturn rules only 20 times.

The superiority of the REINS Act to the CRA is clear: under the CRA, a regulation becomes law by default unless Congress moves to disapprove it. The REINS Act would reverse this, canceling any major regulation Congress does not explicitly approve. In addition, the president would not be authorized to ignore the will of Congress and its interpretation of what the law it has written demands, because no veto is available. The rule doesn’t become law unless Congress approves.

The REINS Act could be the single most beneficial law Congress could adopt in defending the Constitution, upholding individual choice, and advancing economic certainty and progress. Congress and only Congress was given the power to regulate interstate commerce. It didn’t jealously guard that power before now; it should do so going forward.

Supplemental Info:

Our courts have to often taken it upon themselves to amend rather than interpret the law.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/3421817/mike-johnson-activist-judges-trump-tax-bill-provision-courts-injunctions/ 

 

https://reason.com/2025/05/26/courts-are-quietly-taking-over-the-internet/

https://www.newsmax.com/robertchernin/democrats-constitution-immigration/2025/05/19/id/1211486/ 

 

Only SCOTUS Can Rein In The Judicial Coup

Read more…

Confederacy of Dunces

Source; My Friend Roger

While very rich neo-liberal elites are quietly engineering a 2028 White House run for gavin newsom — polling among neo-liberals/democrats indicates that the inept child alexandria ocasio-cortez is the real “leader” of the party.  What she lacks in brains, she makes up for in fakeness!  She grew up in a tony New York suburb but pretends to be a hardscrabble Bronx native.  She has an economics degree but knows nothing about economics.  She’s engaged to a redheaded white guy but finds “white supremacy” icky.  She claims to have needed mental health therapy after the “trauma” of the 1-6-21 Capitol protests but insists that she is strong enough to face down America’s nuclear-armed enemies without cowering under a desk.  She also cries a lot near parking lot fences — presumably because she believes that illegal immigrants will never find a good parking space.  At the same time, she believes that America’s “patriarchy” fears her because she is such a strong woman.  Maybe the scary “patriarchy” — much like her economics education — is a figment of her imagination.

Queen alexandria has never been the brightest bulb, but she does shine when standing next to the even dimmer bulbs constituting her poorly lit “squad.”  ilhan omar (who committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother), ayanna pressley, and rashida tlaib make aoc look like a Mensa member by comparison.  Emeritus members jamaal bowman (the moron who claimed to believe that a fire alarm would open an emergency exit) and cori bush dragged the “squad’s” average I.Q. so far down that nobody seemed to really mind when they lost their cushy jobs in Congress.

Relatively new congresscritters (they don’t believe in biological sex, right?) gregorio casar, summer lee, and delia catalina ramirez were apparently also eager to join the “squad.”  That’s a bit like jumping into a sinking lifeboat, isn’t it?  Interestingly, ramirez is the daughter of illegal aliens from Guatemala (her pregnant mom crossed the Rio Grande and gave birth to her in Chicago) and is married to one of BObama’s DACA recipients.  So, in the left-wing/democrats’ quixotic war against “white supremacy,” dcrmakes AOC look like a piker!  If she is to have any chance with libs/dems’ much-needed illegal alien vote, the pretend Puerto Rican might very well need to dump her red-headed fiancé and find someone from central casting with a little more “undocumented” flare!

If “squad” hopefuls turn out to be a bust, there’s always solo artist jasmine felicia crockett.  Even though aoc knows nothing of economics, we all thought she had cornered the market on saying dumb, racist things, until Congresswoman (but what’s a woman?) crockett became the corporate news media’s poster girl (but what’s a girl?) for left-wing/democrats’ insurrection against Trump. 

It’s no secret that the left-wing/democrat Party detests white men.  libs/dems’ whole D-I-E shtick is literally a call to admit, hire, and promote everyone but heterosexual white guys(1).  So crockett must be furious that neo-liberal donors are planning to support, in her words, “the safest white boy” in 2028.  You don’t think she’s talking about eric swalwell, do you?  You know, the guy who got a little too close to Chinese communist spy Fang Fang and suffers from flatulence when speaking on live TV?  Because swalwell is not only one of the dumbest members of Congress, but also one of the dumbest Americans not to have a lucrative career in cable news.  He makes crockett and cortez look like savants. 

That’s where crockett comes in.  Her chief contributions to public debate and unity consist of (1) calling Trump and his voters “racist,” (2) comparing them to “Nazis,” and (3) explaining to like-minded TV hosts why non-white voters must get back on the left-wing/democrat urban plantation posthaste.  She does this in almost every interview.  An impartial observer might conclude that the congresswoman from Texas can remember only three talking points.  That’s probably good enough for CNNbs and MSNBs, but I’m not sure she can hate white people all the way to the White House.

The socialism of the left-wing/democrat is burdened by an excess baggage of marxist dogma, and this baggage is a hazard to the success of the free world. Empiricism is a basic requirement for democratic health. There are the perils which can be understood only if we realize the ironic tendency of virtues to turn into vices when too complacently replied upon; and of power to become vexatious if the wisdom which directs it is trusted too confidently.

1. It’s kind of hilarious that both ocasio-cortez and crockett think Elon Musk is dumb.  crockett says he’s an “idiot” who just “knows how to hire smart people.” alexandria says, “This dude is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met or seen or witnessed.”  Yes, the richest man on Earth, the world’s pre-eminent tech innovator, and the 21st century’s real-life rocket-man who has singlehandedly resurrected space exploration is an absolute imbecile.  crockett and aoc ought to know, they are the real geniuses!

Supplemental Info:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/3422751/trump-transgender-athletes-policy-california-gavin-newsom/ 


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-democratic-party-is-literally-dying/ar-AA1Fn1Bw

 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/05/25/bennet-democratic-party-brand-does-not-help-anywhere/ 

 

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-lies-and-hubris-caused-an-awakening/

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/the_party_of_ba_al_and_jezebel.html

https://anncoulter.substack.com/p/john-lott-jr-the-democrats-censorship?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=871518&post_id=163858429&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=3csg9d&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email



https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/05/free_speech_on_campus_or_not.html

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/05/27/jesse_watters_the_conspiracy_that_biden_wasnt_running_the_country_wasnt_a_conspiracy_it_was_their_strategy.html 

 

https://www.aol.com/jake-tapper-admits-democratic-cover-002629788.html


https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/la-city-council-oks-14b-budget-keeps-7k-homeless-month  

 
Read more…

Did You Know?

This is probably the peoples last best chance to reset Congress and get rid of self serving politicians.

America can't afford to lose control of Congress but we must actually control what Congress is doing. We need to primary every RINO, Socialist, and WOKE politician running for reelection.

435 House seats and 33 Senate seats are up for reelection.

The Democrats want to make America a "Socialist Workers Paradise", and we all know how that has worked out where ever the people didn't stand up and physically stop it from happening.

Most of the old guard Republicans had true to form, opted to protect their power by maintaining the status quo. The people were still too shell shocked and propagandized to properly respond, until Trump shook us out of our Fantasy Realm of political Unicorn farts and rainbow promises from the old guard.

If we don't get up and get out the vote in the primary elections we will absolutely lose the Country. The hidden Elite forces behind the "Destroy American Freedom Movement" will no longer tolerate any divergence from their cherished agenda, of owning and controlling everything in the world. That and having just enough obedient workers owning nothing, and toiling away for nothing, to keep them in luxury for the rest of time.

The Tradesman13565832481?profile=RESIZE_584x

 

Read more…

The utter idiocy of our fellow man!!!!!

Source; In a message dated 5/26/2025 11:18:36 PM Central Daylight Time, countryadam writes

For weeks I have been stating these items discussed below about Trump.  2026 election is coming and I have yet to hear or read about the Republicans and their tactics to win more seats.  85% of all elected officials are re-elected. The dems have a list of over 30 Republicans they are focusing on in 2026.
 
The republicans never continue to push their agenda to the next election but mostly sit back and think they won.  That win is in the past and now a more vicious fight is coming up.  A case in point in Ohio. Bernie Mareno won the senate seat and not once have I heard from his office or him about his accomplishments, bills he worked on and what is next going forward. Granted, he has 4 more yrs but he still is part of the Ohio Rep party and needs to help with keeping those elected and gain in rep wins. And my representative in the house, not a peep.
 
The dem party nationally is in disrepair but on the local level they are still strong.  A few of the dems that work the streets and knock on doors here in my county and town are out there doing what they always do.  I see them and have talked to them.  They appear motivated to overturn the House in 2026.
 
Please would everyone stop having the love fest with Trump and let us not be naive, just 5 people separates the reps from losing the house, and less for the senate.  We have the dems, news media, and most everyone that was against us before are still against us now. My wife and I, along with the group we are in,  just started to campaign for the 2026 election. We all feel the dems  at the local level could win enough seats in the senate and/or the house which will stop everything that is being done.
 
Fox is the station that most people get their news and I hear nothing about the chance the dems could pull off a huge turnover in 2026.  They are still wallowing in the shiny light of the Trump win.  Looking locally, I feel the dems are close to enough to get a couple of wins to take the senate or the house.
 
Read more…

Mr. T. Today

Source; Roger

neo-liberal doctrines are so rigid and totalist that meaningful dissent simply isn’t possible(1). You have to believe in unlimited abortion; you have to believe in transsexual treatment for minors; you have to believe in confiscating all firearms, no functional borders, no government spending limits, and so on. Trump is not conforming to their preconceived notions — and they can only respond with hate.

The opening of Trump’s 2nd term has been one of the most remarkable on record, more so than any other going back to Roosevelt.

Trump has finally succeeded in closing the border, cutting illegal immigration by over 90%. He rescued the economy from almost certain collapse, cutting inflation to levels not seen this century. He has embarked on an effort to reshore industry to the U.S., with more success than was thought possible even 6 months ago. He has embraced a bold and counterintuitive strategy of universal tariffs in order to bludgeon those nations (which is to say, all of them) who think they can abuse the global economy’s reigning T. Rex with impunity. Moans and shrieks from critics have yielded to totally unanticipated results that even include bringing mighty China to heel.

Elon Musk’s DOGE, with Trump’s clear backing, has revealed federal government finances to be a massive money-laundering scheme, with results still to be fully investigated. Over $165 billion has been recovered, and a number of government agencies and offices apparently devoted solely to supporting left-wing agendas have been shut down or curtailed. And he has done this with the same crowd opposing him as in his 1st term, with the addition of a vast cadre of small-time judges in open revolt, while Congress and the Supreme Court try to outdo each other in their imitations of a 3-toed sloth.

Trump has punished the universities that allowed anti-Semites, terrorists, and wokies to run riot on their campuses, forcing them to take action. 

 
Not the least, he has brought the left-wing/democrat Party to the brink of destruction. The party is now a ghost of itself, consisting of half-senile ancients, howling harridans, and sexually ambiguous freaks. It has lost its connection with the working class, the trust of the common voter, and is quickly losing the minorities that it claims to “defend.” It has no leadership, no prospects, and as far as can be seen at the moment, no future.


It’s a remarkable performance of world-historical significance. And Trump still has 3-and-a-half years to go. It will not do to underestimate Trump. This guy has more chess moves in his head than Kasparov, Karpov, and Bobby Fischer combined. A few years ago, Victor Davis Hanson published The Savior Generals. How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars that were Lost, a study of military commanders who appeared in times of crisis to retrieve almost untenable situations, including Themistocles of Athens, Matthew Ridgeway in Korea, and David Petraeus in Iraq. 1 of his conclusions is that, even while successful, many of these commanders were seriously mistreated in the wake of their victories, being reviled, ignored, and even punished. The ingratitude of nations and peoples is often hard to fathom. This is not unknown in politics. Consider Rudy Giuliani, who, as AG, destroyed the Mob’s power in New York City and then went on to save the city itself as mayor. Today, he is persecuted, near bankrupt, a political outcast, and all for one reason: he supported Trump.This should not have happened to Giuliani, and it must not happen to Trump.

And anyway, we all seen that the alternative is worse, much, much worse!

 

1.    neo-liberal theorists claim that only from unideological competition between organized interest groups would there happily/fortuitously arise the common good of the whole society, though democracy is not a criterion of the adequacy of such a culture or for finding truth.

 
Supplemental Info:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/victor-davis-hanson-how-trump-is-upending-the-status-quo-from-beijing-to-gaza-to-kyiv-5860378?src_src=Goodevening&src_cmp=gv-2025-05-21&est=oJ3OWJA77Weq7DxPG5MTLI3Uny0sNV%2Bfx1PlEZbYlMqFTEkFXbFJ9ZZGSTr%2B

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-end-of-neoconservatism/ 


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/05/23/kudlow_president_trump_is_gradually_winning_the_culture_wars.html


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/05/trump_s_second_term_economy_defies_the_doubters.html

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/05/25/tarlovonomics-n2657606


https://spectator.org/trumps-poll-numbers-rise-resistance-2-0-flops/


NATIONAL SURVEY: Trump Approval Surges to Fifty-five Percent Following Middle East Trip: InsiderAdvantage

Read more…

Why Is The Brunson Case So Important?

Source; Julian Assange

Many of you have heard of the Brunson case...it has never been decided...here is what "Julian Assange" posted on Telegram regarding it:

BRUNSON VS. THE DEEP STATE – MAY 17, 2025: THE JUDGMENT THAT COULD ERASE BIDEN AND RESTORE TRUMP

TODAY IS NOT A HEARING. IT’S A WEAPON. The Supreme Court is now holding the most dangerous case in modern U.S. history. If they rule in favor of Brunson, the Constitution detonates through D.C. like a bomb. The Biden regime is nullified. The 2020 fraud becomes official record. And Donald J. Trump is recognized as the rightful Commander-in-Chief.

THE CASE THAT CAN COLLAPSE EVERYTHING
Raland J. Brunson filed one question before the Court:
Why did 388 members of Congress REFUSE to investigate 50 formal claims of election fraud?
Not overturn — investigate. They declined. That’s not politics. That’s betrayal of their oath. That’s TREASON.

If the Court rules in favor of Brunson, it forces:

– Biden’s entire presidency ERASED
– Kamala Harris STRIPPED of power
– Post-2020 laws and policies OBLITERATED
– Congress held legally accountable for aiding an illegitimate coup

THE SUPREME COURT IS ON THE EDGE OF HISTORY
Today, the justices are not choosing between parties — they are choosing between law and tyranny.
If they rule honestly, Trump is not "reinstated." He is acknowledged as the true President — because he NEVER lost. He NEVER conceded. He NEVER gave up the will of the People.

IF JUSTICE WINS, THE SYSTEM BURNS
The Deep State knows what this means. That’s why there are no press briefings, no statements, no noise. Just silence. Because if the ruling comes down in favor of truth, the protections shielding them disintegrate.

THIS IS NOT POLITICS. THIS IS WAR.
This case isn't about who you voted for. It's about whether 388 elected officials can ignore election crimes without consequences.
If the Court says yes — tyranny wins.
If the Court says no — the Deep State dies tonight.

TRUMP NEVER LEFT. HE WAS LOCKED OUT.
They called it a transfer of power. But the power was STOLEN. Trump still carries the lawful mandate of the People. And if the Court stands tall today, it won’t be a comeback — it’ll be a recognition.

THE FINAL QUESTION IS SIMPLE:
Does the Constitution still exist — or is it a relic buried by traitors?
The justices now face that choice. And America holds its breath.

IF THEY TELL THE TRUTH — THE REPUBLIC LIVES.
IF THEY LIE — WE FIGHT.

Read more…

Source; Anonymous;

Dialogue:

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting.”-- Aristotle

"If you permit appeals to unity to bring an end to criticism, you endanger not only our liberty, but even its future existence.”--Robert Taft

“It was the Sophists, as opposed to Aristotle, who placed a higher value on whether a statement is useful to the speaker than whether it is an accurate description of reality.”---John D. Mueller

“…a contemptuous and over-confident person derives too little benefit from a speaker, an enthusiastic and guileless admirer derives too much injury.”---Plutarch

 

Integrity in the pursuit of truth means that one must submit oneself to dialogue with others to find out whether one is right. The purpose of dialogue then, properly pursued, isn’t to undermine the truth in order to find common ground in order to make converts. Neither is approval of a partner’s preconceived notions a prerequisite for entering into dialogue.

 

Effective dialogue has many variations. For John Adams it was to confront, argue, shout, rant, and then to embrace, intimacy-trumping ideology. For Thomas Jefferson it was to evade, maintain pretenses, to avoid debate, then convinced himself that all was well, letting ideology trump intimacy.


The concept of dialogue in practice often has the effect of leaving all questions permanently unresolved and relatively meager results.  But friends are those who love each other in the truth and seek mutual growth in the truth. We typically don't look for what is, we look for how do I do it. So it helps to make friends with people in order to be able to discuss things with them, because sometimes you have to say things that are uncomfortable, and if you don't have that friendship, the discussion doesn't work.

 

Those who are truly interested in engaging in honest/effective dialogue instead, in order to seek truths about our world, are going to need a lot more fortitude than many of the well intentioned platitudes about dialogue imply(1). They’re going to have to be ready to hear things that make them uncomfortable, to have courage and patience and they’re going to have to “take offense” a lot less often (“taking offense” being the usual response du jour for nearly everything that challenges one’s assumptions, presuppositions and current views). To recognize that the mere presence of a particular rhetoric cannot automatically be used to impugn theoretical and factual truths.  Only when there is such a shared love of truth can there be a true dialogue.

For when we deny our opponents a forum to honestly speak, we haven’t defeated their arguments or changed their minds, we’ve merely forced their views underground. Replacing the evaluation of an argument on its intrinsic merits of evidence with ad hominem attacks is a form to primitive intellectual tribalism, where knowledge and reason degenerate into a riot of subjectivism and absurdities. Such action is the hallmark of the self-assertion of the Nietzscheian will, with nothing to pursue but the satisfaction of its own appetites and power. And power such obtained easily devolves into a lawless attempt at domination.

The correct path then is to treat humans as beings of both intellect and appetite, fallen yes but, capable of great understanding, in need of guidance in the disciplines necessary to the virtue of truth.  In the words of Pope Benedict then, from his Caritas in Veritate: Truth needs to be sought, found and expressed within the economy of charity, but charity in turn needs to be understood, confirmed and practiced in the light of truth...a matter of no small account today, in a social and cultural context which relativizes truth, often paying little heed to it and showing reluctance to acknowledge its existence. Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality…an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way…It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions…to the point where it comes to mean the opposite...of little relevance.”

In dialectic dialogue the student will get training in thinking.

 

“My intention is not to prove that I was right but to find out whether I was right.”---Bertolt Brecht

"If the people are capable of understanding, seeing and feeling the differences between true and false, right and wrong, virtue and vice, to what better principle can the friends of mankind apply than to the sense of this difference?" --John Adams

“The ‘discussion’ method of decision making allows extended debate, further experiment, a weighting of costs and benefits, conflicts of expert opinion, successive resort to different political jurisdictions each with the authority to effect or obstruct change, or plead for reconsideration.” --N. Rosenberg

 

“The people who don’t think are the ones who never listen.”—Bruce Kasenoff

 

1. “Censorship’s the strongest drive in human nature; sex’s a weak second.”---Nat  Hentoff

 

Supplemental Info:

In New Haven, it’s not free speech if you hurt someone’s feelings 

Read more…

Broken by Design

Broken by Design:

How Elites Engineered the Collapse of the American Family.

This video goes a long ways to explain why we are in such a mess today.

The collapse of the American Family is responsible for the perverse and immoral situation being forced on us, to totally shatter any resistance to the elites taking full control of everyones lives world wide.

If you look closely at any form of government not run and controlled by the people themselves in an honest and moral fashion, you will see all the similarities of the ancient royal word is law, the original communism, fascism, and socialism, is the main goal of the top people controlling those forms of government.

As an example; Politician Bernie Sanders an avowed Socialist/Communist ranting and raving for his form of government to provide for the masses, eqalizing wealth,  screamed for lower medicine prices, but has not accomplished anything except making himself a multi-millionaire.

That's the systen the Elites are trying to install in America.

The inroad all started with the dismantling of the Traditional American Family. From that came all the following destruction of the traditional moral society.

Link to video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YmswmXEtOQ

 

The

Tradesman

Read more…

dd6469da6768a744579db47ac51cbff0.png?width=568

 

List of U.S. Senators with Pharmaceutical Contributions (1990-2024):

1. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI): $600,000
2. John Barrasso (R-WY): $500,000
3. Michael Bennet (D-CO): $1,500,000
4. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN): $600,000
5. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE): $320,793
6. John Boozman (R-AR): $200,000
7. Mike Braun (R-IN): $150,000
8. Katie Britt (R-AL): $50,000
9. Ted Budd (R-NC): $100,000
10. Laphonza Butler (D-CA): $50,000
11. Maria Cantwell (D-WA): $200,000
12. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV):
$300,000
13. Ben Cardin (D-MD): $1,200,000
14. Tom Carper (D-DE): $800,000
15. Bob Casey (D-PA): $1,790,780
16. Bill Cassidy (R-LA): $600,000
17. Susan Collins (R-ME): $700,000
18. Chris Coons (D-DE): $400,000
19. John Cornyn (R-TX): $900,000
20. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV):
$421,000
21. Kevin Cramer (R-ND): $150,000
22. Mike Crapo (R-ID): $600,000
23. Ted Cruz (R-TX): $300,000
24. John Curtis (R-UT): $450,000
25. Steve Daines (R-MT): $200,000
26. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL): $150,000
27. Dick Durbin (D-IL): $1,000,000
28. Joni Ernst (R-IA): $150,000
29. Deb Fischer (R-NE): $200,000
30. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ): $244,135
31. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY): $800,000
32. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): $500,000
33. Chuck Grassley (R-IA): $400,000
34. Bill Hagerty (R-TN): $100,000
35. Maggie Hassan (D-NH): $90,000
36. Josh Hawley (R-MO): $100,000
37. Martin Heinrich (D-NM): $300,000
38. George Helmy (D-NJ): $10,000
39. John Hickenlooper (D-CO): $200,000
40. Mazie Hirono (D-HI): $200,000
41. John Hoeven (R-ND): $250,000
42. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS): $100,000
43. Jim Justice (R-WV): $50,000
44. Ron Johnson (R-WI): $300,000
45. Tim Kaine (D-VA): $600,000
46. Mark Kelly (D-AZ): $100,000
47. John Kennedy (R-LA): $200,000
48. Andy Kim (D-NJ): $106,778
49. Angus King (I-ME): $150,000
50. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN): $700,000
51. James Lankford (R-OK): $150,000
52. Mike Lee (R-UT): $100,000
53. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM): $200,000
54. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY): $50,000
55. Joe Manchin (I-WV): $600,000
56. Ed Markey (D-MA): $400,000
57. Mitch McConnell (R-KY): $2,020,462
58. Bob Menendez (D-NJ): $1,474,575
59. Jeff Merkley (D-OR): $200,000
60. Jerry Moran (R-KS): $300,000
61. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK): $100,000
62. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK): $400,000
63. Chris Murphy (D-CT): $300,000
64. Patty Murray (D-WA): $1,000,000
65. Rand Paul (R-KY): $100,000
66. Gary Peters (D-MI): $400,000
67. Jack Reed (D-RI): $300,000
68. Pete Ricketts (R-NE): $100,000
69. Jim Risch (R-ID): $150,000
70. Mitt Romney (R-UT): $2,700,392
71. Jacky Rosen (D-NV): $300,000
72. Mike Rounds (R-SD): $150,000
73. Bernie Sanders (I-VT): $1,918,361
74. Brian Schatz (D-HI): $200,000
75. Adam Schiff (D-CA): $196,635
76. Chuck Schumer (D-NY): $1,500,000
77. Eric Schmitt (R-MO): $50,000
78. Rick Scott (R-FL): $200,000
79. Tim Scott (R-SC): $596,000
80. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH): $400,000
81. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ): $556,000
82. Tina Smith (D-MN): $200,000
83. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI): $187,096
84. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI): $800,000
85. Dan Sullivan (R-AK): $150,000
86. Jon Tester (D-MT): $1,000,000
87. John Thune (R-SD): $400,000
88. Thom Tillis (R-NC): $300,000
89. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL):$50,000
90. JD Vance (R-OH): $50,000
91. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD): $300,000
92. Mark Warner (D-VA): $600,000
93. Raphael Warnock (D-GA): $50,000
94. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA): $822,573
95. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI): $300,000
96. Roger Wicker (R-MS): $300,000
97. Ron Wyden (D-OR): $1,500,000
98. Todd Young (R-IN): $300,000

Read more…

by Robert Williams
May 13, 2025 at 5:00 am

  • "Animal-based foods, especially red meat, dairy, and farmed shrimp, are generally associated with the highest greenhouse gas emissions," according to the UN.

  • What to eat instead? The WEF has for years aggressively been advocating insects to be approved as a food ingredient for human consumption. European Union member states have happily complied with the WEF's wishes... As a special treat, EU member states, in 2021, approved the introduction of mealworms, migratory locusts and house crickets as so-called "novel food" that can legally be sold in foodstuffs.

  • The "climate change" movement is huge business; the billionaires pushing this scrofulous narrative have it all figured out. They have been investing in plant-based fake meat foodstuffs to reap the profits once the war on farmers has been won... If these highly processed foods are not healthy, too bad. The earnings will line the WEF elites' pockets.

  • "Alternative proteins" would have to replace meat, Bill Gates said in a 2021 interview; the climate crisis "is much worse than the pandemic." For that reason, he is also betting on Nature's Fynd, a company that makes food that sounds irresistible. "This company, Nature's Fynd, is using fungi. And then they turn them into sausages and yogurt. Pretty amazing," Gates said.

  • The elites know what they are doing. Shutting down farms and killing livestock means that prices will skyrocket, even more than they are today, forcing "ordinary" people without the financial means of Gates, Bezos and Klaus Schwab to stop eating meat, and eventually live off plants and insects to "save the planet," all while the citizenry's elected and unelected overlords continue living their billionaire lifestyles.

  • Costs will continue to rise for as long as people permit those "leaders" to determine how we should live and what we should eat. The time to put a stop to their warmhearted "protection" is now. mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gatestoneinstitute.org%2Fpics%2F5362.jpg&t=1747142034&ymreqid=b16ac307-28b6-2bc8-1c3e-7e000101ac00&sig=W5Tb7j69T2zAiAHZqY9kIw--~D

    "Animal-based foods, especially red meat, dairy, and farmed shrimp, are generally associated with the highest greenhouse gas emissions," according to the UN. What to eat instead? The World Economic Forum has for years aggressively been advocating insects to be approved as a food ingredient for human consumption. Pictured: A dish of basil pesto tagliatelle, made with ground fly larvae and garnished with mealworms, at Gourmet Grubb, a food stand run by chef Mario Barnard in Cape Town, South Africa, on July 17, 2019. (Photo by Rodger Bosch/AFP via Getty Images)

    The United Nations, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and other international organizations trying to implement fanciful agendas on "climate change" are waging a war on food.

    "About a third of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions is linked to food," the UN posits.

    "The largest chunk of food-related greenhouse gases comes from agriculture and land use. This includes, for instance, methane from cattle's digestive process, nitrous oxide from fertilizers used for crop production, carbon dioxide from cutting down forests for the expansion of farmland, other agricultural emissions from manure management, rice cultivation, burning of crop residues, and the use of fuel on farms."

    To get to "net zero," apparently, we are supposed to greatly reduce, or entirely stop, eating meat.

    "Animal-based foods, especially red meat, dairy, and farmed shrimp, are generally associated with the highest greenhouse gas emissions," according to the UN.

    What to eat instead? The WEF has for years aggressively been advocating insects to be approved as a food ingredient for human consumption. European Union member states have happily complied with the WEF's wishes -- without asking a single European consumer what he might think.

    As a special treat, EU member states, in 2021, approved the introduction of mealworms, migratory locusts and house crickets as so-called "novel food" that can legally be sold in foodstuffs. Most recently, this January, the EU authorized "the placing on the market of UV-treated powder of whole Tenebrio molitor larvae (yellow mealworm) in... bread and rolls, cakes, pasta-based products, processed potato products, cheese and cheese products and fruit and vegetable compotes, intended for the general population."

    In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has yet to approve the consumption of insects, which, mercifully, are still viewed by the agency as filth or "pests" that contaminate food.

    World leaders, as has received some notice, now consider cow flatulence to be so dangerous to the future survival of the planet that more than 68 countries, including the US, Australia, Canada and the EU states, have approved the use of the chemical Bovaer in cattle feed to prevent the poor cows from breaking wind, thereby allegedly reducing their emissions of methane.

    Is Bovaer bad for humans, short-term or long-term? Nobody knows. Any doubts are immediately discredited as conspiracy theories. We are nevertheless assured that they are perfectly safe both for humans and cows at the recommended dosage. It should be noted, however, according to the safety data sheet of Bovaer, that the chemical in itself poses a hazard to fertility, eyes and skin. Were consumers ever asked if they want chemical additives with unknown potential side effects in their milk products? No. The product was approved in the US by the FDA and commercially launched in late 2024. Perhaps this would be a product for Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr to look deeper into.

    If you had been thinking that the war on food was limited to adding insects and chemicals to food, you would have to think again. The program is also, apparently, a war on agriculture – an idea that would seem self-defeating, but one that has successfully spread across the West. In the US, during the Biden administration, the private-jet-flying Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Change John Kerry announced:

    "Agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world. And we can't get to Net Zero—we don't get this job done—unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. You just can't continue to both warm the planet, while also expecting to feed it. It doesn't work. So we have to reduce emissions from the food system."

    In the EU, member states have committed to the European Green Deal, a plan that sets a goal of reducing emissions by at least 55% by 2030. To solve the fictitious "climate crisis," livestock and agriculture must be reduced or, better yet, shut down. In the Netherlands, one of the world's largest agricultural producers, the EU has set aside 1.47 billion euros to buy out and close down roughly 3,000 small and medium-sized farms to meet targeted reductions in carbon emissions. If farmers do not sell out voluntarily, the result might be forced buyouts.

    Farmers who close down their homestead must guarantee they will not start up livestock farming operations again elsewhere in the Netherlands or the EU. "The Dutch government says it must curb its nitrogen oxide and ammonia emissions by 50% by 2030 to comply with EU greenhouse gas emissions targets," according to Farmers Weekly. "It considers livestock farms as 'peak polluters' and says their closure is necessary to meet the regulations."

    In Ireland, last September, in a plan that would reportedly cost $640 million, the government, suggested killing 200,000 cows over the next three years to "reduce methane emissions."

    In the UK, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is waging a tax war on farmers that will force many out of business. In addition, the government is offering farmers money for not producing food crops but rather growing feed for birds. "We've been offered £2500 [by the government] to join a scheme for three years, where we don't supply you any food," a British farmer told a Reform UK meeting.

    As one British farmer rhetorically asked, "Where will the food come from in the future?" That's an excellent question, but the "climate change" elites have answers for that, too.

    The "climate change" movement is huge business; the billionaires pushing this scrofulous narrative have it all figured out. They have been investing in plant-based fake meat foodstuffs to reap the profits once the war on farmers has been won. People like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos have for years been investing in fake meat ventures. The entire purpose of Beyond Meat, Impossible Foods and others is to become a replacement for real meat, which, if the elites get their way, you will no longer be able to eat. If these highly processed foods are not healthy, too bad. The earnings will line the WEF elites' pockets.

    "Alternative proteins" would have to replace meat, Bill Gates said in a 2021 interview; the climate crisis "is much worse than the pandemic." For that reason, he is also betting on Nature's Fynd, a company that makes food that sounds irresistible.

    "This company, Nature's Fynd, is using fungi. And then they turn them into sausages and yogurt. Pretty amazing," Gates said. He himself, of course, says he prefers real meat burgers, just as he also prefers private jets to fly him between his multiple mansions.

    "I probably have one of the highest greenhouse gas footprints of anyone on the planet. Personal flying alone is gigantic," he admitted. But that's okay, according to Gates. He is rich and can afford to pay for his preferences, unlike us peasants, who will have to eat fungi and bugs.

    "Now, I'm spending quite a bit to buy aviation fuel that was made with plants. You know, I switched to an electric car. I use solar panels. I'm paying a company that actually, at a very high price, can pull a bit of carbon out of the air and stick it underground."

    Gates is also the largest private landowner in the U.S.

    The elites know what they are doing. Shutting down farms and killing livestock means that prices will skyrocket, even more than they are today, forcing "ordinary" people without the financial means of Gates, Bezos and Klaus Schwab to stop eating meat, and eventually live off plants and insects to "save the planet," all while the citizenry's elected and unelected overlords continue living their billionaire lifestyles.

    Costs will continue to rise for as long as people permit those "leaders" to determine how we should live and what we should eat. The time to put a stop to their warmhearted "protection" is now.

    Robert Williams is based in the United States.

Read more…