The Tradesman's Posts (137)

Sort by

 

U.S. Government Caught Funding “Large Scale Social Deception” Through Thomson Reuters Special Services

 

Leaked Contract Reveals DHS-Backed Program to Manipulate Public Perception

 

A newly uncovered federal contract shows that Thomson Reuters Special Services LLC (TRSS) was awarded over $9 million for a secretive program labeled “Active Social Engineering Defense (ASED) Large Scale Social Deception (LSD).” The contract, issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), suggests the U.S. government is funding large-scale influence operations designed to shape public narratives.

 

What We Know So Far

This revelation follows previous concerns about Thomson Reuters’ deep ties to intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

 

TRSS, a subsidiary of the global news and data company, specializes in high-level analytics and surveillance tools, often used by government agencies for counterterrorism and national security purposes.

 

Public records show that TRSS has been involved in contracts with the U.S. government for years, providing intelligence solutions, predictive analytics, and data monitoring systems. However, this new contract, explicitly mentioning “Large Scale Social Deception,” marks a SCARY shift toward potential disinformation and psychological operations aimed at the public.

 

The “Active Social Engineering Defense” (ASED) component of the contract suggests efforts to counteract social engineering threats...typically referring to cybersecurity and misinformation threats from adversaries.

 

The “Large Scale Social Deception” (LSD) wording indicates an initiative that may involve coordinated narrative control, online influence campaigns, and mass persuasion tactics.

 

Why This Matters

 

Thomson Reuters, known as a major global media and information provider, is now confirmed to be engaged in government-funded programs that appear to involve intentional deception at scale.

 

If this program is actively operational, it could mean that information fed to the public...whether through traditional media, social networks, or other digital platforms...may be subject to manipulation without public knowledge. (Obviously)

 

The contract is officially categorized as a “definitive contract,” meaning it is not speculative but an active, fully executed agreement with funding in place.

 

Neither DHS nor Thomson Reuters has publicly commented on the nature or objectives of this contract, and further details remain classified.

 

The explicit phrasing suggests the program goes beyond simple defense mechanisms and into the realm of orchestrated public perception management.

 

With digital information warfare becoming a growing concern globally, and mainstream media distrust on the rise, the existence of a government-funded “social deception” initiative raises serious red flags about how narratives are shaped, who controls the flow of information, and whether the public is unknowingly subjected to manipulation.

 

Follow

now for breaking updates.

 

Discovered by

and

 

now for breaking updates.  Discovered by

and

 
Image

 

Read more…

THE REAL STORY OF BENGHAZI

 
Source; Chuck Lawler @ Pure Arizona
 
WOW ! THE REAL STORY OF BENGHAZI BROKE REMEMBER WHEN HILLARY TESTIFIED “What Difference Does It Make Anyway” YOU THOUGHT THAT WAS LOW  So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.
 
Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA.
 
Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
 
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.
 
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi.
 
Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya. Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
WOW ! THE REAL STORY OF BENGHAZI BROKE<br /> REMEMBER WHEN HILLARY TESTIFIED<br /> “What Difference Does It Make Anyway”<br /> YOU THOUGHT THAT WAS LOW 👇<br /> So here's the REAL
Read more…

Letter to Congress

I Received this from an anonymous source, and I am passing it on; 

A Letter for Y'all to Send or E-Mail to your Senators and Representative - Stop the Impeachment!!!!

ENOUGH OF THIS IMPEACHMENT BULLSHIT!!!!!!  SAME OLD SH*T DIFFERENT PRESIDENTIAL TERM!!!!!!

 ------- Copy and Paste letter below.............

 I am writing to demand that you take a strong and public stand against the latest sham impeachment effort being pushed against President Trump. This is nothing more than another chapter in the relentless witch hunt that began during his first term, where he endured two baseless impeachments driven by partisan politics rather than facts.

The American people are sick and tired of these political games. We see through the corruption and manipulation at play. Instead of focusing on the real issues affecting everyday Americans—our economy, border security, crime, and international threats—Democrats and their allies are once again weaponizing impeachment for their own agenda. This is an outright abuse of power and a disgrace to our constitutional system.

I urge you to fight back against this nonsense. Speak out. Push back. Do everything in your power to expose this charade for what it is. The American people are watching, and we expect our elected officials to stand up for truth and fairness, not allow this circus to continue unchecked.

 

I look forward to your response and to seeing you take action.

Read more…
Socialism in it's three forms of Communism, Fascism, and Socialism presents itself as a benevolent way to help the Common people overcome the 'abuses' of the rich and powerful. That is the ongoing lie it has always perpetuated. However it is just a reiteration of the Master/Slave relationship so predominant throughout human history. 
 
When you take a long hard look at it, in retrospect you can see where the Elite Leaders have led their government into conning their people into believing slavery to a ruling class, is in effect freedom and a better way of life for the people. This includes Capitalism as well, but to a much lesser extent. At least with Capitalism, and the limiting factor of a voluntarily enforced Written Constitution, there is always an existing chance for the people to work towards a better life for themselves and their families in a free society. 
 
Look at the governing philosophy advocated by the NWO and the WEF. Look at other controlled or indoctrinated groups with leaders like Klaus Schwab. Once you compare them to what the Democrats have been induced, recruited, or bribed into promoting, you'll see how completely controlled, manipulated, and brainwashed, their supporters have been duped into believing.
 
For any form of Socilism to work, it takes a self installed ruling class. A ruling Class promoting the form of government they see something in, that benefits them personally, instead of their publicly stated benefits to the common folks about helping them. 
 
They start with a program specifically constructed to play on peoples moral principles and charitable natures. A program supposely to make everyones lives better and more equal. In retrospect after that's established, it starts their existing civilization falling into disrepair and dissolution and collapse. 
 
They do this using misdirection, lies, innuendo, false compassion, self destructive programs, ridiculing religion, destroying morality, bastardizing science, rewriting history, all disguised as helping the downtrodden. This goes on until the overburdened social order collapses under it's own weight. 
 
Concurrently, they gradually impose their new order, traditions, morality, religion of non-religion, to realign the mindset of the populace. From the beginning on, they set themselves up as benevolent leaders, promoting the same goals and lifestyles as the common people, while living the lifestyles of Kings. 
 
For example; Look at the contrast between what Senator Bernie Sanders promotes for his voters and what he does for himself; He advocates they should live in financial and lifestyle equality. Have their 'rich oppressors' turn over all profits and money above the common financial and lifestyle level. Have those profits distributed equally to the people. 
 
Compare that with the actual lifestyle he lives, and his increasing monetary worth.
 
Now compare all of this, with what the Democrats have done and still Advocate doing. They have been trying to take down everything built up since the beginning. Generation upon generation of tried and true societal morality and traditions. Doing it under under the false flags of diversity, equality, inclusion and compassion. In fact the way they do it, actuality destroys everything they say it's accomplishing, while setting up their few as a ruling class unto themselves. They believe they are razing the existing society to benefit themselves. Until we can make them believe that won't happen, we will be at risk of total destuction. Same goes for the players on the world stage.
 
Compare them with what Trumps doing; Trump advocates restoring the once common principles of our floundering society. A return to common decency. A return to tried and true morality and integrity. A Return to common sense and honesty. A return to a hand up, not a hand out and self reliance. A return to a meritocracy not to the lowest common denominator, just to name the basics Trump wants to see America embrace as a nation again. 
Read more…

Another Letter to your Senators.

Source; Roger

After RINO Mitch voted against President Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense I had ChatGPT compose a letter to my Senators......  (see letter below. Just copy and paste.)
 
I hope each of you will copy and send to both of your respective Senators too...... We need to get that RINO out !!!!!!!
 Roger.
 
After RINO Mitch voted against President Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense I had ChatGPT compose a letter to my Senators......  (see letter below. Just copy and paste.)
 
I hope each of you will copy and send to both of your respective Senators too...... We need to get that RINO out !!!!!!!
 
Roger

Here’s a draft for your letter. Feel free to make any adjustments to personalize it further.


[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Date]

The Honorable [Senator’s Name]
United States Senate
[Office Address]
Washington, D.C. [ZIP Code]

Dear Senator [Last Name],

I am writing to you as a concerned constituent to express my urgent view that it is time for a change in Senate leadership. Specifically, I urge you to take active steps to remove Senator Mitch McConnell from any and all leadership positions in the Senate and, if appropriate, encourage him to step down from his role altogether.

For years, Senator McConnell’s leadership has shaped the Senate in ways that I believe have undermined its ability to function effectively and equitably. While every public servant has their strengths and achievements, his approach to governance has often prioritized party politics over progress, resulting in gridlock and partisan division.

I believe that the Senate needs fresh leadership—leaders who are committed to transparency, bipartisan cooperation, and representing the true interests of the American people. I urge you to take a stand, whether through internal discussions, public advocacy, or other appropriate measures, to ensure that the Senate is led by someone who embodies these values and priorities.

Your constituents look to you for leadership, and I trust that you will act in the best interests of your state and the nation. Thank you for considering this important issue, and I hope to see tangible steps taken in this direction.

Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Contact Information]

Read more…

Letters.

Source; Roger

We have already wasted 7 days of 47's administration. Below is a letter that I wish each and every one of you would copy and send to both of your State's Senators and your Representative!!!!! It's easy just copy and paste!!!!

Vigorously Support President Trump!!!!!

I am writing to you as a concerned and engaged citizen of (your State) to urge you to support our newly elected President and his agenda. As you know, the people of this country have spoken decisively in the recent election, granting him a mandate to “Make America Great Again.” It is crucial that our elected representatives work together to honor the will of the people and ensure the implementation of the President’s vision for a stronger, more prosperous America.

I understand that some of the President’s executive orders or policies may seem unconventional or even controversial at first glance. However, I firmly believe that these measures are part of a well-thought-out strategy to achieve tangible results for the benefit of all Americans. It is imperative that Congress and the administration work in unison to address the challenges facing our nation, including economic growth, national security, and restoring public confidence in government institutions.

As my representative, I urge you to set aside any differences you might have and collaborate with the President to advance policies that will move our country forward. The American people expect their elected officials to prioritize the needs of the nation above political rivalries or personal reservations.

Your leadership and commitment to representing the voices of your constituents are more important now than ever. Please stand with the President in his efforts to make meaningful change and deliver on the promises made during the campaign.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your service to our great state and nation. I look forward to seeing your efforts to support the President’s agenda and contribute to the betterment of our country.

Read more…

Roll Call Vote on H.R. 30

Roll Call 17 | Bill Number: H. R. 30  

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202517  Full vote, happily measure passed.

Please Thank those who voted for it, and critisize and rebuke those who voted against it.

To Rebuke them, send the letter to the Office of the Clerk and request it be forwarded to the Reps who voted against HR-30 and send a personal letter directly to your own Reps about your outrage at them.

Read more…

Source; SNGLR

When I was in civil service as the Air Traffic Control (ATC) Training Manager, that was a big topic in 2014.  How was ATC going to control and monitor the drone population and it was just beginning then.
 
You talk about a major threat to our nation with all the folks that have come across the border unvetted. 
 
It wouldn't take much for them to fly these small drones into our infrastructure and take it out.  And it appears there is not a thing that our military currently can do about it.
 
Everyone should know we were sold out by the corrupt administration currently leaving and they are doing their best to prevent the new administration to implement safety measures.
 
There are a lot of folks that need to be investigated for treason and if evidence is found, prosecuted and given the penalty for treason!!!!!
 
It all had better happen quickly!!!!!!
 
Roger
 

Why the US Military Can't Just Shoot Down the Mystery Drones

Small, easily weaponizable drones have become a feature of battlefields from the Middle East to Ukraine. Now the threat looms over the US homeland—and the Pentagon's ability to respond is limited.
13328782481?profile=RESIZE_180x180
Photograph: Getty
 
 

A spectre is haunting the United States—the spectre of drone warfare.

Since the middle of November, unidentified unmanned aerial vehicles have lit up the skies above New Jersey, startling residents and baffling military and government officials. The US Army’s Picatinny Arsenal research and manufacturing facility in the state’s Morris County reported 11 confirmed instances of mysterious drones illegally entering its airspace since the middle of the month, while a dozen drones were spotted hovering over US Naval Weapons Station Earle in Monmouth County in early December. Similar sightings were reported in at least six other counties throughout the state; according to the Coast Guard, a group of drones even followed one of the service’s vessels “in close pursuit” near a state park.

The spate of drone sightings in the skies above New Jersey have caused alarm among state lawmakers, prompting one to call for a “limited state of emergency … until the public receives an explanation” regarding the source of the unidentified drones. One Republican US congressman even claimed the drones were originating from an Iranian “mothership” lurking off of the state’s coastline, an assertion the US Defense Department quickly batted down.

“As you know, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst possess [sic] capabilities to identify and take down unauthorized unmanned aerial systems and have utilized this capability to address overflights of the installation,” New Jersey representative Chris Smith told Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in a December 10 letter. “I urgently request all capabilities possessed by the Department of Defense, especially those in use by JBMDL to be immediately deployed to identify and address the potential threats posed by [drones] over the state of New Jersey.”
Despite the growing chorus of concern from New Jersey lawmakers, the US military appears relatively unimpressed with the sudden incursions. In a December 11 statement, US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) revealed that the command had “conducted a deliberate analysis of the events, in consultation with other military organizations and interagency partners, and at this time we have not been requested to assist with these events.” The following day, White House national security communications adviser John Kirby stated that many of the alleged drone sightings that had alarmed civilian observers on the ground in recent weeks were, in fact, conventional manned aircraft. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Homeland Security echoed this assessment in a statement on Thursday, saying, “it appears that many of the reported sightings are actually manned aircraft, operating lawfully. There are no reported or confirmed drone sightings in any restricted air space.”

“At this time, we have no evidence that these activities are coming from a foreign entity or the work of an adversary. We're going to continue to monitor what is happening,” deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh told reporters on Wednesday. “At no point were our installations threatened when this activity was occurring." (In an interesting confluence of events, the US Department of Justice that same day announced the arrest of a Chinese citizen for flying a drone over and taking photos of Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.)

 

The alarm over the sudden drone incursions over New Jersey, neighboring New York and Pennsylvania, and near sensitive US government sites in particular, even if overblown, isn’t completely unwarranted: Officials at North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)—the joint US-Canadian military organization tasked with overseeing air sovereignty on the continent—revealed in October that they had received reports of nearly 600 incursions above domestic US military installations since 2022.

The issue is, US law severely limits how the US military can respond to these mysterious drones—even if the number of incidents has been growing for years.

Indeed, for several months earlier this year, unidentified drones repeatedly circled Plant 42 in California, the Edwards Air Force Base installation where defense contractor Northrop Grumman has been working on the Air Force’s vaunted new B-21 Raider stealth bombers. In December 2023, Langley Air Force Base in Virginia was targeted by a wave of mysterious drone overflights, prompting the Pentagon to relocate a contingent of F-22 Raptor fighter jets stationed there to another base. And the New Jersey incidents come on the heels of a mid-November series of drone incursions near RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom, which, while not a US domestic installation, hosts a strategically-important contingent of American fighter jets, among other capabilities.

It appears that Pentagon assets in the continental United States have been subject to such drone activity as far back as 2019, when a fleet of US Navy Arleigh Burke-class destroyers was shadowed by a swarm of drones for several days during maneuvers at a training range off the coast of southern California. Later that year, a series of mysterious drone sightings in eastern Colorado and western Nebraska and Kansas confounded not just local law enforcement and federal agencies, but alarmed Air Force officers at nearby F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, home to one of the Pentagon’s many Minuteman III ICBM fields.

These incidents aren’t limited to US military facilities. In October 2023, several drones were detected in the airspace above the US Energy Department’s Nevada National Security Site, which is used for nuclear research and development, the Wall Street Journal recently reported. And back in 2019, the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in Arizona—the most powerful nuclear power plant in the United States—was subject to a series of mass drone incursions that Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials would later characterize as a “drone-a-palooza,” albeit with grave concern over the potential vulnerability exposed by the incursion, according to email correspondence obtained by The War Zone in 2020.

“I would point out that restricted airspace will do nothing to stop an adversarial attack and even the detection systems identified earlier in this email chain have limited success rates, and there is even lower likelihood that law enforcement will arrive quickly enough to actually engage with the pilots,” one senior NRC security official at Palo Verde wrote in an email regarding the incident. “We should be focusing our attention on getting Federal regulations and laws changed to allow sites to be defended and to identify engineering fixes that would mitigate an adversarial attack before there our [sic] licensed facilities become vulnerable.”

 

While unmanned aerial vehicles have been in military use for generations for surveillance and reconnaissance, the US military is largely responsible for transforming modern drones into vehicles of precision violence during the early years of the Global War on Terrorism, a policy especially expanded under US president Barack Obama. In more recent years, the rise of cheap, commercially-available unmanned platforms like those used by hobbyists has turned the small drone into the weapon of choice for both nation states and irregular forces abroad, from militant groups like ISIS In Iraq and Syria and the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen to the Russian and Ukrainian militaries. With a potential conflict with China over Taiwan looming on the horizon amid the US military’s pivot to “great power competition,” the Pentagon is itself in the midst of a major surge in both unmanned capabilities and technology to defend against weaponized drones belonging to foreign adversaries.

The US military has been slowly but surely adjusting to the sudden spike in mysterious drone incursions near sensitive sites across the United States with an expanded counter-drone strategy. In early December, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin signed the Pentagon’s new Strategy for Countering Unmanned Systems, which seeks to unify disparate DoD efforts to address the rise of drone threats both at home and abroad into a single coherent framework, one that implicitly acknowledges the potential for the rising tide of domestic drone threats to grow from intrusive surveillance risks to something more damaging.

“From the Middle East to Ukraine and across the globe—including in the US homeland—unmanned systems are reshaping tactics, techniques, and procedures; challenging established operational principles; and condensing military innovation cycles,” the unclassified fact sheet on the new Pentagon strategy states. “The relatively low-cost, widely available nature of these systems has, in effect, democratized precision strike.”

The Pentagon has been working overtime to field fresh counter-drone capabilities to US forces deployed overseas in recent years, including traditional firearms outfitted with computerized optics and remotely operated vehicle-mounted heavy weapons turrets, laser-guided rocket and missile systems, AI-assisted kinetic interceptors, radio frequency- and Global Positioning System-jamming electronic warfare suites, and even exotic directed energy weapons like high-energy lasers and high-powered microwaves, among others. As recently as late October, NORTHCOM was working in conjunction with the Federal Aviation Administration to demo fresh counter-drone tech as part of its Falcon Peak 2025 experiment at Fort Carson in Colorado.

“By all indications, [small unmanned aerial systems] will present a safety and security risk to military installations and other critical infrastructure for the foreseeable future,” NORTHCOM boss Air Force general Gregory Guillot told reporters at the time. “Mitigating those risks requires a dedicated effort across all federal departments and agencies, state, local, tribal and territorial communities, and Congress to further develop the capabilities, coordination and legal authorities necessary for detecting, tracking and addressing potential sUAS threats in the homeland.”

But US military officials also indicated to reporters that the types of counter-drone capabilities the Pentagon may be able to bring to bear for domestic defense may be limited to non-kinetic “soft kill” means like RF and GPS signal jamming and other relatively low-tech interception techniques like nets and “string streamers” due to legal constraints on the US military’s ability to engage with drones over American soil.

“The threat, and the need to counter these threats, is growing faster than the policies and procedures that [are] in place can keep up with,” as Guillot told reporters during the counter-drone experiment. “A lot of the tasks we have in the homeland, it’s a very sophisticated environment in that it’s complicated from a regulatory perspective. It’s a very civilianized environment. It’s not a war zone.”

Defense officials echoed this sentiment during the unveiling of the Pentagon’s new counter-drone strategy in early December.

“The homeland is a very different environment in that we have a lot of hobbyist drones here that are no threat at all, that are sort of congesting the environment,” a senior US official told reporters at the time. “At the same time, we have, from a statutory perspective and from an intelligence perspective, quite rightly, [a] more constrained environment in terms of our ability to act.”

The statute in question, according to defense officials, is a specific subsection of Title 10 of the US Code, which governs the US armed forces. The section, known as 130(i), encompasses military authorities regarding the “protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft.” It gives US forces the authority to take “action” to defend against drones, including with measures to “disrupt control of the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft, without prior consent, including by disabling the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft by intercepting, interfering, or causing interference with wire, oral, electronic, or radio communications used to control the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft” and to “use reasonable force to disable, damage, or destroy the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft.” 

 

As The War Zone points out, 130i limits when and where the US military can actually deploy counter-drone assets outside of immediate self-defense in the face of an imminent threat. Notably, it requires the defense secretary to “coordinate” with both the US transportation secretary and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) administrator regarding any counter-drone implementation that “might affect aviation safety, civilian aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of airspace.” Not only that, but 130i authority is only applicable to a specific list of installations, mainly those dealing with nuclear deterrence and missile defense functions of the US national security apparatus.

This, in turn, limits what kinds of counter-drone systems the US military can actually employ domestically. Service members may be up to their eyes in fresh counter-drone tech overseas, but the regulatory environment at home is rigid enough that “hard kill” solutions like missiles, guns, and other kinetic interceptors aren't even considered potential options because there’s simply too much risk that they might end up inflicting collateral damage on innocent, unsuspecting civilians in nearby neighborhoods. Even “soft kill” solutions like RF and GPS jamming require coordination with the FAA and other federal agencies to prevent potential harm to civilian air travel, approvals that could slow down the reaction time among base security forces amid a potential drone incursion.

“Given the impact of GPS denial, just across infrastructure and all that stuff, it is a very, very difficult capability to get permissions to utilize,” as one official told The War Zone at Falcon Peak.

While the Pentagon’s broad new counter-drone strategy is a step in the right direction when it comes to bolstering domestic drone defenses, Congress is taking action as well. In the compromise version of the annual National Defense Authorization Act defense budget legislation unveiled in December, lawmakers included language calling upon the Pentagon to not just conduct an assessment of the counter-drone technology landscape at large, but generate recommendations on how policy changes could reduce the amount of burdensome bureaucratic coordination between federal agencies required to address the growing number of drone incursions—and, in an ideal world, allow the US military to move quickly and decisively to counter intrusive drones at sensitive installations before they become dangerous.

“We agree that US troops have the inherent right of self defense, including from [drone] attacks, wherever they may be,” the explanatory statement accompanying the compromise NDAA says.

At the moment, the Pentagon seems unconvinced that the Northeast drone sightings and earlier incursions are connected to a foreign adversary. But with lawmakers increasingly concerned with the potential threat to sensitive installations and critical infrastructure in their states, the US military’s renewed approach to counter-drone defense can’t come soon enough.

 

Read more…

How to aid Trump and begin taking back our stolen rights.

SAVE for the 2026 - 2028 Elections;

Here is a way to bypass the corrupt and progressive owned media. It would cost about $30.00 per person, more or less depending on how many postcards you would send out in your district. 
The way is to write a simple but verifiable message on a regular prepaid postcard, with the message tailored to the Districts where the Progressives are going to be stumping to get re-elected. 
Simply set up a small but damning list of 3 or 4 critical issues where the Incumbent Democrat or RINO candidate has betrayed the public trust they are supposed to be representing, and end with the comment "Are you sure you you want to allow this to continue?" 
All postcards should be sent out about a week amnd a half before the Primary Elections, with a suggestion for a fully vetted challenger candidate in the case of RINO's, and a fully vetted write in candidate for the Progressive Democrats. 
The next wave of postcards should be sent out a week before the Regular election, with the vetted candidates promoted who are challenging the Incumbents. 
Do Not send write ins against the RINO's who made it through the primary process as that would split the vote.  
These postcards should have as the final line on them; Please tell all of your friends about this and/or send some postcards out to them as well.
 
Sample Format for main elections in 2028;
Postcard 1,
RepSen X voted for bill Y that's cost the people their rights.
(EXAMPLE);
Rep/Sen x voted against Picture ID for voting.
Rep/Sen x voted against Election Reform measures that would eliminate voter fraud.
Tailor the cards to what the most controversial issues are at the time for the Primaries
Rep/Sen x voted against the peoples wishes on bad Gun Control that will take away Constitutional Rights and make people easier victims.
Sen x voted against protecting the borders.
Rep/Sen x voted for Green Energy Production, GreenBatteries etc. that produces up to 10 to 20 times the pollution as conventional sources, and 100 times the toxic poisons in the disposal of used up elements.
 
Postcard 2 for All Primaries in 2026 - 2028;
(Example);
Rep/Sen x voted for a spending bill that lifted the debt ceiling and will cost the taxpayers an unknown amount more in taxes.
Rep/Sen x voted for a bill that gives Trans right to use any bathroom or play on any team.
Rep/Sen x voted for forced vaccinations.
 
List the most outrageous transgressions the official has done on these cards!!!
 
Of course the samples will have to be researched and tailored specifically for every State and every District to have valid information contained within them. the Progressives will not be able to discredit actual facts and figures in their controlled media at that late a date. Imagine if just 2% of the conservatives at large, did this, and of that sending another 2% of those who received it passed the information on, and so on and so on.
 
Read more…

Ramblings on the 14th Amendment

14th Amendment are you Pro or Con and why?

part 1

I believe the 14th Amendment and the way it was forced on the Southern states basically at gun point by Congress citing they had to ratify it to again be recognized in the Congress, was the beginning of the end for States Rights. Don't forget the Civil War was originally fought over the question of States Rights, and not over slavery.
 
 
  • Here's something I found that explains my position even better than I could; Part 1
    The problem with the 14th Amendment is the premise under it that imply's; "WE ARE ALL U.S. citizens, under the 14th amendment. There are NO STATE Citizens." That, and that alone gives the Federal Government the FALSE and UNENUMERATED authority to do what they want. Given the Language of the Constitution and the meanings that prevailed then, that statement can not be construed as a legally valid statement! 
    Strictly speaking the 14th Amendment was the one that Quietly took away states Rights and was Unconstitutionally passed. 
    The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution should be held ineffective, invalid, and unconstitutional for the following reasons:
    1. The Joint Resolution proposing said amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress per Article I, Section 3, and Article V of the U. S. Constitution.
    2. The Joint Resolution was not submitted to the President for his approval as required by Article I, Section 7 of the U. S. Constitution.
    3. The proposed 14th Amendment was rejected by more than one-fourth of all the States then in the Union, and it was never ratified by three-fourths of all the States in the Union as required by Article V of the U. S. Constitution. The federal courts are not ready to give consideration to the subject, because the U. S. Supreme Court and inferior courts have used the the 14th Amendment to enlarge upon their ungranted powers without limit or reserve. To read a complete treatise on this and on the most comprehensive research and documentation of every angle in the unlawful procedures, check out this link;http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html it's a long but informative read.

    Consider this about the flawed ratification of the 14th amendment as the most critical points cited in the article;
    A) New Jersey was disenfranchised in the Senate by having its lawfully elected Senator accepted, and then rejected, and without a 2/3rds vote;
    B) Oregon's faulty ratification vote with unlawful state legislators being allowed to cast votes; and the lawfully constituted state legislature then rejecting the Fourteenth, but too late.
    C) Non-republican [Reconstruction] governments of the southern States imposed by military force and fiat, cannot ratify anything. Either the Fourteenth is legal and the anti-slavery amendment is not, or the anti-slavery amendment is legal and the Fourteenth is not. 

    Article I, Section 7 of the United States Constitution provides two things; Every bill which shall have been passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States Congress, AND:
    "Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him shall be re-passed by two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill." 
    The Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite9 ) was never presented to the President of the United States for his approval, as President Andrew Johnson stated in his message on June 22, 1866 (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite9 ). 
    Therefore, the Joint Resolution did not take effect.

    It may be helpful to know that the 14th amendment proclamations of July 20, 1868, (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite51 ), and July 28, 1868, (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite53), were issued as Presidential Executive Orders.

    Presidential Executive Order No. 6 **, issued July 20, 1868. Ratification of the 14th Amendment certified as valid, provided the consent of Ohio and New Jersey be deemed as remaining in force despite subsequent withdrawal. **Signed by William H. Seward, Secretary of State. Has the form of a proclamation.

    Presidential Executive Order No. 7 **, issued July 28, 1868. 14th Amendment certified as in effect and ordered published. **Signed by William H. Seward, Secretary of State.

    From Presidential Executive Order Title List -- Presidential Executive Orders, 2 vols. (N.Y.: Books, Inc., 1944 Copyright by Mayor of N.Y. 1944), vol. 1, pp. 1-2.

    In this light the 14th (amendment), which has perplexed many, is an Executive Order, not an (Article) of Amendment to the Constitution of the united States of America, albeit a statute and so remains an Executive Order.
    ( above information is from barefootsworld.net research pages and reposted here for general information and education on the subject).

    Another challenge to the Article V Constitutionality of the Ratification of the 14th Amendment under it's requirements is that it only permits Congress to propose amendments whenever two thirds of both houses deem it necessary. that can and should be considered as two thirds of both houses as they were constituted before the forcible ejections caused by Reconstruction laws. Add to that, Congress violated Constitutional Requirements by depriving the Southern States of their equal suffrage in the Senate (The provision is; " no State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate." )and there are no exceptions to that in the article one's Constitutional Language, therefore it was forbidden for the then 'fragmentary congress' to do that. In fact the plain language within the Article is incontrovertible and not open to interpretation. It is not in the purview of Courts, or the Legislative bodies of either Federal or State governments to alter the fixed Constitutional methods of proper legal ratification of an Amendment.

    Neither you, nor a court, nor a legislative body, can raise an illegally proposed or illegally ratified amendment to the force of legal authority as part and parcel of the constitution if it is not legally ratified by any of the methods required by Article V. There is no such thing as an Amendment by congressional waiver, nor by Laches ( failure to do something at the proper time, especially such delay that will bar a party from bringing a legal proceeding). Congress cannot acquiesce an amendment into being, in fact you cannot give an amendment power by any means but the specific means set down in Article V of the Constitution.

     
    Part 2;
    When the mandatory provisions of the Constitution are violated, the Constitution itself strikes with nullity the Act that did violence to its provisions. Thus, the Constitution strikes with nullity the purported 14th Amendment.
    The Courts, bound by oath to support the Constitution, should review all of the evidence herein submitted and measure the facts proving violations of the mandatory provisions of the Constitution with Article V, and finally render judgment declaring said purported amendment never to have been adopted as required by the Constitution.
    The Constitution makes it the sworn duty of the judges to uphold the Constitution which strikes with nullity the 14th Amendment.
    And, as Chief Justice Marshall pointed out for a unanimous Court in Marbury v. Madison (1 Cranch 136 at 179):
    "The framers of the constitution contemplated the instrument as a rule for the government of courts, as well as of the legislature."
    "Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government?"
    "If such be the real state of things, that is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime."
    "Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."
    The federal courts actually refuse to hear argument on the invalidity of the 14th Amendment, even when the issue is presented squarely by the pleadings and the evidence as above.
    Only an aroused public sentiment in favor of preserving the Constitution and our institutions and freedoms under constitutional government, and the future security of our country, will break the political barrier which now prevents judicial consideration of the unconstitutionality of the 14th Amendment.
    A background on the 14th including the intent as stated by Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th and was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan. 
    http://www.14thamendment.us/amendment/14th_amendment.html ) What are your views? Should it be "Repealed", or should "the Supreme Courts added intent of birthright citizenship for a child having "Foreign National Parents illegally in this country", by the highly Liberal Earl Warren Court be removed from it?" 

    The Tradesman
Read more…

God and American Beliefs

God and American Beliefs

The only way to save America and it's traditional values.

I fail to see why certain liberal people get so upset when anyone talks about or even says they believe in God. They seem to get even more upset when anyone talks about Jesus as their Savior and Redeemer. The true Marxist/Socialists are non-believers, and they want to impose their lack of belief on everyone else. They want that because they want to be considered the highest power anywhere. America over the last two or three decades, has been slipping into the idea that there is no God, and, the Ten Commandments are mythological/antique artifacts whose time has past.

I personally believe there is a Supreme Being. A being that our small minds can not understand. We universely call that being GOD. We use analogies to try and comprehend what the being we call GOD is. That's why we have so many diverse religions. The divisions between Religions, and how they view God, and in their rituals to honor God. That causes much friction. 
It's strange because every Religion considers there is only one true God. So, in actuality we who revere and honor God, are all praying to and trying to please the same Supreme Being.

In general, all the major religions, have some form of the 10 commandments as an integral part of their belief system. The non-believers also have a system that mimics, but does not work as well as the moral lessons of the Ten Commandments. Commandments we used to try to incorporate into, and practice in our society.

When you look at it from a civilization viewpoint, you see the Ten Commandments are the most concise ground rules for a workable human society, bar none. They work! The concepts behind them work. They stop abuse and excessive behavior on moral grounds. They teach Honesty and Integrity. They also teach honor. Our Societies adherence to them in spirit and fact, offers a benevolent moral and spiritual society.  What's wrong with that? 

At one time America was a stalwart Christian Nation. Believing in God, and keeping the Ten Commandments. Our Founders were mostly all Christian, or saw the impact to our fledgling nation as benefiting from the moral and social foundation that Christian morality provided. They also saw the need to keep the spiritual aspect incorporated in creating our laws, but not writing Christian Religious Dogma into law. Therefore they wrote into law, a seperation of church and state. This did not mean the United States would be godless, it meant the United States would not have a sanctioned formal State Religion like England had.

The watershed moment when rejection of our traditional values manifested publicly, was with the Madalyn Murray O'hare ruling. The ruling where the extremely liberal/left Supreme Court of Chief Justice Earl Warren, took God out of schools, and the purge of God from Federal, State, and Local government began. That was the beginning of what some say immoral, and what some say Godless, decisions of courts and law makers began. It won't end until America takes God back into the process and returns to 'letting but not forcing' God back in schools and other government functions, then using the Ten Commandments as moral guidelines for laws and regulations we live by.
Read more…

We Must Reform or Lose

 

We Must Reform or Lose

Today, we need to re-evaluate our position on what this country needs to do, to reform itself back to the original intent of the Founders. The Founding Principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence, were categorized in the creation of the Constitution. Though it was a wonder in it's time, it still had many problems then, as it does now. That is the reason the Founders included Article-V. 

Just as the authority was given by act of Congress to revise the Articles of the Confederation of the Perpetual Union, it also gave a One Time Authorization, to the delegates of what became the Constitutional Convention. Article-V gives the Congress, and also the people through their States, the rights to amend, not the wording of the Constitution, but the way the Justice System interprets the intent of that wording. On how to apply Constitutional Law to every law, regulation, or practice. 

Article-V allows Federal Legislators authority to correct any problem the changing times creates. It also gives the people the 'Supreme Authority' to overrule their own government. So far our government, through the actions of Congress, has modified the intent of the Constitution 27 times. 

There have been approximately 11,000 other Amendments proposed and never ratified by the people into law. Affirming the people as the highest authority in the land, they have the final say on how they will govern themselves. 
(https://constitutionus.com/constitution/amendments/constitutional-amendments/) It is what keeps our Representatives from becoming our Overlords and Task Masters.

We have all seen how the Government has incrementally but consistently moved forward inserting itself as the ruler in our lives, instead of it's proper designated role as our servant.

We have seen how President Trump tried to reform the Federal Government. Likewise we have also seen how quick the embedded elements who created the usurpation of the peoples legitimate power, changed them back by edict or executive order. We can no longer allow that to happen. We can no longer believe our Federal Government will act in our best interests instead of their own.

The only way to take back our rightful authority is through the Amendment Process. The process is so lengthy and complicated to make it hard to change the interpretation of the Constitution for trivial reasons, and acts as a check and balance. The Congress has the authority to create laws, but those laws are constrained by Constitutional Limitations. The limitations are the checks and balances on Congressional law making powers.

Congress has seen fit to create all of the 27 amendments/changes interpreting the Constitution, since the Constitution was originally ratified. Strangely enough, the people through their States, have not had an amendment convention to propose/repeal amendments. In fact this action has been discouraged by many politically active naysayers over the years. If the people finally did Demand and Get a proposal convention, the main losers would be the Congressional powers taken from the people by some of the Congressionally proposed Amendments. 

As an example; The 17th Amendment gave people the right to vote for Senators. Until then, the Senators by Constitutional Law, were appointed Representatives of their respective States Legislatures under the Sherman Compromise, to insure Equal Representation in Congress, of every State in America regardless of it's population and size. Since the 17th was ratified, the Senators have devolved into representatives of their political parties and party agendas, instead of representing the People or the States in Congress to Congress.
My position is, this Amendment should be repealed like the 18th was repealed.


Another amendment which would benefit the people and their States, would be to get a term limit amendment ratified that included: 
Pay to be voted on by the people instead of allowing Congress to just give themselves a raise. 

Retirement and healthcare packages for Congress to be the same as given to the people by Social Security/Medicare, but not to disallow any private packages personally paid for by the individual, but independent from Government funds. 

Modifying the 14th amendment due process clause to forbid Anchor Babies. 
Preventing Congress from giving funds from social/welfare programs,et.al.to any illegal alien/s 

Eliminating the Federal Reserve and return money creation back to the Treasury under the original Tresury rules and regulations. All laws rules and regulations to be written in common language understood by average Americans. 

Allowing the Legal American Citizen Voters to overturn any law or ruling by a 70% vote against it in a scheduled or special election. 

Plus any more proposals the people may want to see. 

Those posibilities are why a States called Convention, is the greatest fear of the hidebound politician or political party. They would lose their say in how we decided to govern ourselves, and turn back into mere representatives of our wishes.

To preserve the Union, we must demand our State Legislatures petition Congress for an Article-V convention.
 
Read more…

"Because You're Here!"

Source; Oren Long

There is much angst over why the people in the Mid-East fight us so viciously.  "Why are they so against us when all we're doing is trying to help them?" is the prevailing Western attitude.  
 
We don't get it and, I suspect, CANNOT get it.  It is far outside our reality.  It isn't that we DON'T get it; it's that we WON'T get it.  
 
I served a year in the Mid-East.  I get it.  
 
First, we must understand that the Mid-East has been 'on fire' for millennia.  The Greeks figured it out.  The Romans figured it out.  Even the Russians figured it out.  Now it's our turn.  
 
Muslims, Christians, and Jews have been at each others' throats in the Mid-East throughout recorded history-- AND PROBABLY ALWAYS WILL BE!  
 
THEY DON'T WANT US THERE, PERIOD!  It's their problem and they will deal with it as they -- NOT US -- please.  
 
As long as America and other countries 'assume' that we 'know best', they will resist and fight.  
 
This is best exemplified in a movie I saw years ago concerning the American Civil War.  In the movie, a Union and Confederate soldier confronted each other away from their units.  They talked.  In one scene the Union soldier asked the Confederate soldier why the South was fighting so hard.  The Confederate put it perfectly,  "BECAUSE YOU'RE HERE!".  
 
How would Americans feel if foreign countries imposed their rules, values, standards, morality, etc. on us by force of arms?  We would FIGHT!  "It's none of their damned business!  Get out!.  We'll settle it ourselves!  GET OUT!"  
 
Personally, and having been there, I have long believed that we just need to let them deal with the mess they have made.  
 
Yes, we can trade with them, but that's about all we can do.  
 
On the flip side, we CAN let them know that if they attack Israel, America, or any of our sworn allies and friends, HELL ITSELF will be unleashed upon them!  
 
Other than that, there is nothing we can do.  They broke it and it's up to them to fix it.  If they want to live in a state of perpetual war, well, too bad for them.  
 
Oren    
 
Read more…

How Did We Become A House Divided?

Source; politicalfacts@juno.com

The author of this piece uses a pen name, E.P. Unum, E Pluribus Unum a familiar phrase.  Please take the time to read this.  Read it again.  Absorb it.  Digest it.   Think about it.  Pass it on.  I welcome your comments.

How Did We Become a House Divided?
An Open Letter to All Those Suffering from TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome);
Supporters of Black Lives Matter, On the Payroll of George Sorus
and Admirers of Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx
 
By:  E.P. Unum
January 14, 2024
 
Dear Malcontents, the Seemingly Oppressed and Misguided Students:
 
I just have a few questions for you.  I already know you don't like President Trump and feel that he is the cause of all your problems, including, but not limited to, the Great Flood, Noah’s Lost Ark, the Black Death of the Middle Ages, WWI, WWII, the Korean War, and Vietnam and the many other trials and tribulations of mankind. You feel this way because that is what you have been told by the paid-for liberal media, who have lost all sense and discipline of what it means to be a journalist, your socialist/communist college professors, and the cancel culture crowd, hell-bent on destroying everything about our nation.  I get all of that.  I don’t accept it, but I understand you think you are upset and are feeling oppressed.  Hell’s bells, Trump was in government for four years while Joe Biden has been in government 53 years, Nancy Pelosi 47 years, Chuck Schumer 44 years, Gerry Nadler 41 years, and Adam Schiff 27 years, so Trump must be at the heart of all the problems because things were fine up until Trump arrived, right?
 
I feel for you and I would like your help in trying to understand why there is such a huge schism….a division in America.  How did we become a house divided?  I’d like to understand how it all started and why you blame President Trump for this.
 
So, reflecting on a bit of actual (not revisionist) history, here are my questions:
 
• Did this division in America and among Americans start when none (as in zero) of the Democrats showed up for President Trump's Inauguration on January 20, 2017?  Was that the date when the division began?  He hadn't even taken the Oath of Office, and except for the Clintons and Obamas, not one Democrat showed up. Is that when Trump divided America? Do you think it was respectful on the part of Democrats to not show up for the traditional transition of power from one Administration to the next?  Can you imagine if the Republicans didn't show up for Obama's inauguration because they lost?   I can’t because, in the neighborhood where I grew up, you would be considered sore losers if you did something like that.  But, what I did see was women marching in Washington wearing pink vagina hats and screaming obscenities against Trump because they suddenly and inexplicably developed a hatred for the man without ever giving him a chance to demonstrate what he could do for America…and all Americans!  But was this part of the division we are experiencing in our country?
 
• But perhaps it can be narrowed down a bit more precisely.  Did the division in America begin when 19 minutes after Trump was inaugurated, the Washington Post declared the Impeachment Campaign had Started? Was that when Trump divided America?
 
• Did this great schism that divides us begin when Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's State of the Union Address right in front of the entire world, showing complete disrespect for the President of the United States and the Office he holds? Did that one self-serving, hateful, and ridiculous act bring the country together, or was that the point when Trump divided America?
 
• Did the division occur when America had to endure, 3 years and over $40 million dollars spent on investigations and hearings trying to prove that Trump won the 2016 election because of Russian Collusion (whatever that is) and not because America voted him into office?  Or did the division occur when  17 democrats did everything in their power, including spying on President Trump before, during and after his election, in an attempt to prove that there was collaboration with Russia and that he was…wait for it….a Russian Agent...and came up with zero evidence to support their contentions! Was that when Trump divided America?
 
• Do any of you remember, the donors, people like Michael Bloomberg, who gave $27 million, Tom Steyer who gave $17 million, George Soros who gave $9 million and dozens of Hollywood Stars and Liberal Corporate Executives who gave multi-million dollars to Hillary Clinton, and now wanted a return on their investment?  How do you think the Russians felt after they had forked over $145 million to the Clinton Foundation?  Do you think that kind of financial assistance was simply because they thoroughly liked and respected Hillary?  Do you realize that the Russians, the people President Trump was accused of collaborating with, made zero, zilch, nada donations to the Trump campaign?  Yet, President Trump was the one who was investigated!  Was that when Trump divided America?
 
• Do you really think that all these donors who had given hundreds of millions of dollars did so just because they love and adore Hillary?  Wealthy, successful business people don’t do that.  These weren't campaign donations, they were investments into what Hillary had promised them when she became president. They were so sure she would win and they would be showered with huge returns, and when that didn't happen, and they realized their investments were lost, they went all out to take Trump out of office by any means possible.  Oh, and by the way, did you know that 90% of the Mainstream media and the corporations that own them are owned by or run by large Democrat Voters? You can verify all of that for yourselves...I did.  But, I digress.  Let me ask the question: was this when Trump divided America?
 
• Since the moment Trump won, and even before he was inaugurated, the mainstream media's reporting was 92% negative on Trump.  Do you know why?  Well, one reason surely might be that all those big donors who lost millions of dollars on their investments in support of Hillary’s quest to become President, suddenly had zero chance of getting a return on that investment when Hillary lost!.  These folks weren't going to take that loss lightly. They needed to punish Trump and those that voted for him.  They realized that Trump could not be controlled by them like Hillary could, and so they were faced with the only possible solution: they needed to find a way of getting him out of office.  And that way was a bloodless coups d’etat…impeachment.  And on the road to impeachment they would stand fast at being uncooperative with any Trump initiatives.  The result was a totally dysfunctional government in terms of getting legislation enacted.  But that didn’t stop Trump.  Despite this, he built the greatest economy our country has ever seen, got NATO to finally contribute its fair share and rebuilt the U.S. military to the strongest force in the world!  But all of you suffering from TDS still hate him! Why is that? It just doesn’t seem logical!
 
I've said this since the night Trump was elected..."There is nothing the left won't do to take down our President, our country, and us; no low to which they won't go to get their power back".  Sadly, we have seen this every single day since his election.  There was no clearer illustration of this than when Democrats lined up to cast filthy accusations against Judge Kavanagh trying to prevent him from becoming a Justice of the Supreme Court for which he is eminently qualified and deserving.  They levied baseless, fraudulent accusations without a shred of evidence mind you, charging Kavanaugh with sexual molestation, causing him and his family tremendous anxiety and embarrassment.  Thank God Judge Kavanaugh had the quality of character and integrity to face these accusations squarely and with the competence that will make him a successful Associate Justice of our Supreme Court.  But was this chapter in the Trump Presidency when the great division in our country began?
 
Then there were the two failed impeachments of Trump, both based on fictitious evidence, in a quest to remove Trump from office.  Was this when Trump divided our nation?
 
Let me ask you this...Have you ever listened to Trump or appreciated any accomplishments or campaign promises he's kept?  Have you ever gone to one of his rallies or have you just closed your mind to anything he does?  You do realize, I hope, that if you objectively evaluated Bidenomics and measured it against the economic results of the Trump administration you would find that there really is no comparison.  Trump wins hands down!
 
Have you looked into the wonderful things Trump has done for everyday people like you and me, without fanfare or publicity?  His good works are legion and the stuff of which movies are made.  Trust me.  I know…firsthand!.  Do you know that he served our nation as President and did not accept a single penny for his work, opting to donate his entire salary of $400,000 per year ($1.6 million) to various charities and causes like Wounded Warriors, Disabled Veterans, the Interior, etc?  Did President Obama ever do this?  Did Joe Biden ever do this in any of the 53 years he has been in government?  Has anyone serving as President ever done this?  Are you aware that President Trump, without fanfare or media attention, visited Arlington National Cemetery, alone, sometimes when it was cold and raining, solely to pay respect to our fallen heroes?
 
Please ask yourselves the following questions:
·      What has Joe Biden done for America for the last 53 years that he's held an office?
·      What did Joe Biden ever do for Black Americans when he and Obama were in office?
·      What has Joe Biden ever done in his entire life to create a private-sector job?
·      What has Joe Biden done to help the American middle-class worker?
·      What has Barack Obama done for Blacks, Hispanics, and people of color?
·      What has Barack Hussein Obama done to help the U.S. Economy during his tenure?
 
Let me also ask you this...Why do you think there are so many people tearing down statues, burning our flag, beating up police officers, robbing small business owners in broad daylight, disrespecting our founders, and hating our country along with the contemptuous college students protesting against Israel and waving Palestinian flags in our streets shouting “from the river to the sea”?  You do know this phrase contemplates the destruction of the state of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East and one of America’s strongest allies!  But today, three years into the Biden Presidency, our silver-tongued leader announced that he suddenly does not support Taiwan's independence!  Yet another abandonment of an American ally and an open invitation to China to move against this nation.  Forgive me, but didn’t Biden do the very same thing with Ukraine?  Why?  Whose side is he on?
 
Do you really believe that America was a country founded on evil principles?  Do you honestly believe that America is an imperialist nation? America saved Europe twice in the 20th century winning two World Wars in the process.  What lands and treasures did we seize other than small tracts of land to bury our honored dead?  Do you believe that there is systemic racism in our nation and that all blacks killed in our streets are the result of police brutality?  Here are some facts you need to reflect upon:
 
The reason why today we see so much rioting and violence in our streets and a desire to change our culture and tear down memorials and historical statues is twofold:  First it is the decline in family values and the elimination of Christian faith from our daily lives.  Secondly, is the fault of an education system that is corrupt to its core.  You may not like to hear this, but our children are actually being taught to hate America in our school systems, colleges, and universities across this great land.  They are being taught that there is nothing exceptional about America.  They are being taught Revisionist History, not history as it occurred.  Schools have slowly been tearing down our history.  If you don’t believe me, do some research on Google or any search engine and look up the “1619 Project”.  This has been embraced in over 3,500 school systems in America and it is simply a fraud, a hoax.  And it is being taught to our children and young college-aged students across America.  But, while we are on the subject of education, and in specific, the fallacy of systemic racism, which the left keeps trying to sell to the American public, and which does not exist, if you happen to be a teacher or a parent involved in your child’s education, here are a few additional questions:
• Do you teach your students that it was the Democrats that started the KKK?
• That the Grand Leader of the KKK was none other than Senator Robert Byrd, who was elected to Congress and served for decades as a Senator, and that it was Hillary and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama who gave the eulogy praising him?  Why are there no protests about that?
• That the Democrats fought the Civil War to keep slavery and that Democrats voted against the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution which freed slaves and gave them the right to vote as citizens.  Let that one sink in.
• That the inner-city ghettoes were created by Democrats to keep control of slaves after they were freed?
• That Planned Parenthood was founded in inner cities to control the Black Population?
 
Is any of this in your history books?
 
Let me ask you this as well:
Can a student speak up today when he/she disagrees with a teacher when the teacher says that Trump is a horrible president or the Electoral College has to be eliminated?  Do you know if this happens?  Well, I know a student to whom it actually happened. When the teacher said the Electoral College had to be eliminated because Hillary lost, the student spoke up, took exception to her comments, and provided historical facts as to why the Electoral College was created by the Founders and why it is necessary today.  The teacher responded by giving the class a test and stated she was doing so because the student dared to disagree with her.  How does that sit with you?  This is not an isolated instance.  It is happening all over America today.
 
Did you know that it was the Portuguese who first brought black slaves from Africa to our shores?  I didn’t either because it is not true.  Muslim slave traders did this.  But this is what young students are being taught in our schools today. Do you think the average tenth grader in high school can recite the Gettysburg Address or tell you how a bill becomes a law?
 
Is this any of this happening in schools your child attends?  I'm only asking questions...I'd like you to think about your answers.
 
President Trump and his entire family have been vilified, demeaned, and disrespected, for one reason and one reason only...he won!  And because he won, he was in a position where he can and has upset the gravy train of political corruption.  He is a very dangerous figure to those who have made careers in politics, who can retire after serving only five years of service in Congress and receive a lifetime pension equal to 100 percent of their compensation as either a member of Congress or the Senate.  Can you retire from service and get a pension of $175,000 or $190,000 per annum with full family health care?  I couldn’t and I spent over 45 years in industry and teaching at some of the finest universities in the nation!
 
Have you noticed that Democrats only throw tantrums and object to everything President Trump says or does and have never once gotten behind him to make America the best it can be? Why is that?  The simple answer is: they can't afford to get behind him...he would win again, and they can't let that happen. If he wins again, the Democrat party will be dealt a terrible blow and they know it.  Heck, if you look closely at the Democratic Party today it is nothing like the Democratic Party your grandparents knew.  It is a leftist-leaning, Socialist/Marxist party that is seeking to literally destroy our nation from within and rebuild it as a socialist state.  Remember the words of Barack Hussein Obama…”Change You Can Believe in”  Obama’s entire mantra was to tear down America and rebuild it as a socialist state.  What he meant by that catchy phrase was “We are Going to Change What You Believe!” Just look at the so-called platform espoused by Joe Biden.  It is nothing more than a regurgitation of the Socialist Green New Deal of Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocascio-Cortez, and others and it will literally and figuratively destroy America!  It simply cannot work from a financial and economic perspective.  Their focus on climate change is nothing more than a major effort to usher in a New Order, one which completely restructures our economic and financial system. The end result will be failure as in the cases of Argentina, Venezuela, Cuba, China, and North Korea all rolled into one and it is spelled disaster!
 
It seems to me that people ought to take a deep breath and think a bit about history, specifically who we are and where we came from:  America has been in existence for 248 years.  There are nations on this earth that have existed for thousands of years….China, England, France, Spain, Italy, Japan, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany.  We are a speck in terms of the period these countries have occupied in history.  Yet, America has created the single greatest economy in the history of mankind with the highest standard of living known to man.  We have developed technology, and a space program, earned more Nobel Prizes in Science and Medicine, pioneered flight, cured diseases, and developed new surgical interventions in the span of 248 years.  And during that time we have made slavery illegal in this nation.  Americans need to know that slavery exists even today.  But not in America.  Yes, we have more work to do but as the commercial says so eloquently “We’ve come a long way baby”.
 
But here are some additional questions:
·      Did you notice that the "cages" the left claimed that Trump built to put illegal children in, were built by President Obama for the very purpose of putting illegal immigrant children in them? Was that fact shared all over the news media when Obama did it? The very same "cages"...but the media was silent!!
·      How about when Trump commuted Roger Stone's sentence, and was demonized 24/7 but not a word was said in the media when Obama commuted 1,715 inmates, which included 330 that he granted on his last day in office. Were there reporters even reporting it?  Just look at the difference in the reporting. By the way, when Trump was in office he commuted the sentences of 10 people. Compare that to Obama. Or Bush. Or Bill Clinton.
·      How about when Biden and Obama allowed the H1N1, the Swine Flu, to infect 60 million Americans before declaring it a health emergency? Was the press losing its minds and calling it the “ObamaFlu” and blaming Obama and Biden for the spread? No, just silence…except for Nancy Pelosi who today calls COVID-19 the “Trump Virus”
·      Compare this to the negative media coverage that Trump got when he immediately halted travel from China, to when, that February, Nancy Pelosi went to Chinatown and said come on down, it’s safe!  Or when New York’s Mayor DeBlasio said to ride the subways and go to Broadway Shows....but those same people are blaming Trump for the spread of coronavirus. You can’t make this stuff up!
·      Have you looked at what Trump did with no help whatsoever from the Democratic party to deal with the Coronavirus? 
ü He ordered the retrofitting of two U.S. Navy Hospital Ships capable of handing over 1,000 patients each and dispatched them to Los Angeles and New York City in response to “urgent requests” by the governors of those states. 
ü He deployed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build 3,000-bed hospitals at New York’s Javits Center and San Francisco’s Mosconi Center, and a like number of hospital beds in NYC’s Central Park.  These assets went virtually unused!  Did you catch that….unused? 
ü Trump engineered through government/private enterprise partnerships the single greatest effort to produce PPE (remember then Governor Andrew Cuomo pleading for thousands of ventilators which Trump delivered, the bulk of which went unused). 
ü Then Trump personally orchestrated the fastest level of research to develop a vaccine for COVID-19 as well as the development of much-needed treatment regimens over the criticism and gnashing of teeth of democrats who never lifted a finger to help!  All in record time. 
 
Yet, he is still assailed by the media and Democrats even to this very day.  Why?  What have Democrats done?  What initiatives have they advanced?
 
SOME FINAL QUESTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS:
What have the Democrats done to help make America the best, to get behind a President that works tirelessly and genuinely cares about We the People, instead of using us as political pawns?
 
What have the Democrats done for people of color except for giving illegals more rights than citizens and having us pay for it with higher taxes?  Biden now wants to give illegal aliens free health care and allow them to participate in Medicare.  You do realize that Biden single-handedly is responsible for over 8.0 million illegal aliens entering our nation over the past three years with an estimated 1.0 million “got-aways”.  More threatening, some 300 illegal aliens are on the terror watch list.  Doesn’t that give you a warm and fuzzy feeling of comfort in today’s hate-filled world?  We don’t even know where these thugs are.  Remember, it only took nineteen illegal aliens to give us September 11, 2001. And Biden has allowed over 9 million into our nation.  I have one word for this…treason!  People say he is old and tired.  I say that is true but he is also pure evil because if he were not, he would care about the people…and he doesn’t!
 
Just imagine what this country could accomplish if the Democrats and Republicans actually worked together on behalf of America!  What a novel thought!  Imagine if they worked with President Trump on the economy, the coronavirus, the inner cities where he created opportunity zones, job training, etc.  When Trump tried to get school choice for inner-city students they ran Betsy Devoss out!  The Democrats running those inner city schools wanted no part of school choice. I found this fascinating and very revealing. Have you ever wondered why its cities that have been run, for decades, that have the most homeless, the most crime, the most murders, the worst inner-city schools, are all run and led by Democrats?  Did you know that today, as I write this letter, all of the cities where we are seeing riots, looting, destruction of businesses, desecration of churches, tearing down of statues and monuments, and attempting to destroy federal buildings and courts are all led by Democrats?  Are you happy with that?
 
If you haven't started asking yourselves all of these questions, maybe you should.
 
Today we have front-row seats to the outrageous spectacle of Trump defending himself in four separate legal actions all intended to stop him from running for the Presidency in 2024.  Never before have I ever witnessed such politicization and weaponization of our legal system against one man.  It is a disgrace and a stain on who we are as a nation and as a people.
 
Equally disgraceful was the letter signed by 51 former National Security and Intelligence Officers stating that the infamous Hunter Biden Laptop had “all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign”, when none of these people ever saw what was on the laptop, and didn’t even read the letter.  This was during the Presidential Debate of Trump vs Biden.  It has been proven false and was orchestrated by Anthony Blinkin, now Secretary of State for Joe Biden.  But it was also election interference in spades!  And 91 charges against Trump in four separate jurisdictions, all arising in an election year are also election interference.  This must not be allowed to stand in America.
 
Trust me, this is not because they hate Trump.  It is because they fear him.  Trump is a good man and he is incorruptible…and they know it.  In the minds and hearts of all fair-minded Americans, Trump was a great President and he will be again.  This by no means is intended to thumb down Nicki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy or Ron DeSantis who are all good people.  But Trump can hit the ground running, knows Washington D.C. and the Swamp, and will make the tough decisions needed to set our nation on the right path.  Our country desperately needs his leadership today.
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE VIEWS ABOVE ARE ASKEW BUT 100% CORRECT.
READERS: EXAMINE YOUR SOULS AND DO COMMENT ON WHICH PART YOU DISAGREE.
THOSE OF YOU WHOLLY INFECTED WITH THE TRUMP DERANGEMENT VIRUS CAN ANSWER THIS: WHY DO YOU HATE HIM SO AS TO JUSTIFY THE TREASON OF HIS ENEMIES AND YOURS?
 
 
Read more…

How Rich Eugenicists Weaponized Medicine

Source; https://drtrozzi.org/2023/03/26/how-rich-eugenicists-weaponized-medicine/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

How Rich Eugenicists Weaponized Medicine

 

History recap reveals the 100 year path to the covid-crimes-against-humanity

Early in the twentieth century, the Rockefellers and the Carnegies were deeply involved in eugenics.

The Carnegies and the Rockefellers worked with Abraham Flexnor to invade human health care. They created a medical monopoly that has persisted since then. Their deception and this monopoly resulted in profound deterioration of what was once a robust and diverse free-market human health care sector. What ensued was more than a century of deception, poison based “health care”,  chronic disease, and a high-profit, recurrently-criminal, pharmacologic  industry that has filled grave yards and destroyed lives. In the 2020’s this medical-hospital-industrial complex was used to create the atrocities of the covid-genocide and extensive violations of human rights globally.

Here in under 10 minutes, Dr Glidden gives a great concise history lesson. This will help us remedy our situation, and not be lured into a similar trap in the future

 
VIDEO HERE
Read more…

That Virus

Source; Anonymous

The left-wing schoolmarms at politiFact want you to know that evil scientists are not actually engineering “Disease X” in an effort to stage Plandemic 2.0. Yes, untold hundreds or even thousands of virologists may be tinkering with virus genomes to enhance them for human hosts; and yes, still more of them may be plotting their response to this entirely hypothetical “Disease X” once it begins infecting humans. But, nobody is engineering a specific pathogen for the direct purpose of imposing another public health hygiene dictatorship on the world they tell us.


Neo-liberal lies--AGAIN! One of these threats, after all, has already declared a global pandemic and magnified the harm caused by their lackluster pathogen via lockdowns and the coerced vaccination of billions; the other remains confined to imaginary science fiction scenarios and (strangely) the pandemicists’ own fever-dream tabletop exercises. I guess it is not deranged right-wing conspiracising when our betters contemplate bioterrorism scenarios for fundraising purposes, but should you take their own fantasies at all seriously, well, that is a step too far.

The world economic forum flirts with their critics by cultivating a self-aggrandising Bond-villain rhetoric with just enough plausible deniability for the fact-checkers. Accordingly, they held a monumentally dumb panel discussion yesterday on “Preparing for Disease X.” Naturally, none of our preparers had any significant epidemiological qualifications. The discussion was chaired by a pinched humourless woman named nancy brown, who is CEO of that eminent pandemic preparedness center known as the American Heart Association. Over the course 50 minutes she spoke with WHO Director General tedros adhanom ghebreyesus (who is at least an immunologist), Brazilian Health Minister and social scientist nísia trinidade, AstraZeneca chairman michel demaré, and healthcare executives roy jakobs and preetha reddy. These are the people eagerly plotting all the public-private partnerships, developmental pathways, strategic collaborations, equity initiatives, data sharing projects and viral surveillance programs that will be necessary to stage the next virological circus.
 
 
Read more…

Climate Update Here is the Real Science

Source; Researchers at the University of Minnesota and the U.K.’s University of Leeds, published by the European Geosciences Union,

 

Researchers at the University of Minnesota and the U.K.’s University of Leeds, published by the European Geosciences Union, finds that in the decade between 2009 and 2019, the Antarctic ice shelves increased in mass and extent, on balance. Using global satellites to measure changes in 34 ice shelves across Antarctica

In Geophysical Research Letters, by an international team of researchers from universities and research institutes in the US, Switzerland, and France, found that the rate of meltwater in Antarctica has declined between 1980 and 2021 Using satellite microwave measurements run through the physics-based multi-layer snow model SNOWPACK.

In the science publication Nature by an international team of scientists from universities and research institutes in England, Scotland, and the US found the rate of ice decline in West Antarctica is not reflected in ice trends elsewhere on the continent and varies dramatically by location. They surmise that the ongoing ice loss in the region is likely being driven by “interdecadal atmosphere/ocean variability,” although more study is warranted because direct observations have been limited over time.

In peer-reviewed journal The Cryosphere, determined that ice sheets were thinner in Antarctica during the interglacial in the past than they are now, and that they recovered, indicating natural cycles drive ice extent changes on the continent and ice declines are not irreversible. A team of 13 researchers from universities in the US, the United Kingdom, and Australia, used cosmogenic-nuclide analysis to examine the history of ice sheet decline and expansion in an area of West Antarctica abutting the Amundson Sea, during the present interglacial period (the Holocene).

This research indicates that the present deglaciation is not unique within the Holocene, natural factors have driven deglaciation historically, and such events are not just reversible but have reversed themselves previously, with sea levels falling after the reglaciation commenced. What the evidence indicated, is that glaciation and deglaciation is not uncommon and historically has been driven by natural factors, on net, the Antarctic ice sheet is gaining ice.

Meanwhile, research Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus indicates that a significant factor in “rising sea levels” measured at cities on the U.S. eastern seaboard is land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawals—in other words, they are sinking. Led by Leonard O. Ohenhen at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, with others from Virginia Tech and the U.S. Geological Survey, used: “measurements of vertical land motion rates obtained from analysis of radar datasets to evaluate the subsidence-hazard exposure to population, assets, and infrastructure.” A number of areas along the mid-Atlantic coast are subsiding at annual rates exceeding the calculated rate of actual sea level rise for those areas each year.

Meanwhile, Like hurricanes and tropical cyclones, Extra-tropical cyclones aren’t playing by the climate alarm playbook. Data show ETCs in the United Kingdom, for example, have not been as severe in recent decades as they were in the past, despite media coverage of ETCs in recent years claiming otherwise. And globally, there is no evidence ETCs are worsening either. Who says so? Why, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. So, despite climate alarmists predictions based on model outputs, there is no trend in more powerful or more frequent ETCs. Rather, they are forming and dissipating as they have historically, varying in number and intensity both annually and on a decadal scale.
 
Meanwhile, "When carmakers test gasoline powered vehicles for compliance with the Transportation Dept's fuel efficiency rules, they must use real values measured in a laboratory. By contrast, under an Energy Dept rule, carmakers can arbitrarily multiply the efficiency of electric cars by 6.67. This means that although a 2022 Tesla Model Y tests at the equivalent of 65 miles per gallon in a laboratory (roughly the same as a hybrid). It is counted as an absurdly high compliance value of 430 mpg. That number has no basis in reality or law.  For exaggerating electric car efficiency, the government rewards the carmakers with compliance credits which the can trade for cash, Economists estimate these credits could be worth billions, a vast cross-subsidy invented by bureaucrats and paid for by every person who buys a gasoline powered car...Until recently, this subsidy was a government secret. Carmakers and regulators liked it that way...Regulators could announce what sounded like stringent targets and carmakers would nod along, knowing they could comply by making cars with arbitrarily boosted compliance values, Consumers would unknowingly foot the bill."--WSJ

The above are the worthless carbon credits that companies got rich selling to companies like GM and Ford so they could pretend to reduce the carbon from their highly profitable gas guzzling trucks and SUVs.  In other words, your government, the carmakers and the eco-wackos knew this was a massive fraud but they didn't care. They were greedy and their junk-science addiction needed a fix. People are irrelevant, especially the poor and middle class. And of course, left-wing/democrat campaign workers posing as left-wing journalists, have participated in perpetuating the fraud by just repeating talking points without doing research or asking questions.

left-wing/democrats claim they care about the poor and middle class but the poor have been screwed for years to pay more for their gas-powered vehicles to cover the massive losses from selling inefficient, expensive, impractical vehicles powered by the highly flammable pollutant lithium that environmental extremists are forcing all of us to buy. The fraud(1) in this green agenda dwarfs any other fraud we have ever seen and there is not 1 piece of significant, REAL scientific data that shows the radical green policies will change temperatures or limit storms and maintain sea levels where they are.  It is no wonder the left-wing/dems & eco-wackos seek to shut up those of us who have continually told the truth that the climate has always changed cyclically and naturally and pointed out the fraud for what it is, by calling us climate change deniers and anti-science.

 

1.Among the companies spending big bucks on corporate jets, meta platforms (aka facebook)topped the list in 2022, spending $6.6 million on the perk for personal flights for zuckerberg and sandberg. The figure marks a 55% increase from 2019. neo-liberal hypocrisy--AGAIN!

 

Related Info:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/01/media_members_panic_with_the_record_cold_worry_it_will_derail_warming_tale.html

https://weather.com/forecast/national/news/2024-01-10-arctic-cold-outbreak-south-plains-midwest

Read more…