( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9GCgdy73G4
The watchman on the wall sounding the Alarm
( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )
( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )
Not the first Somali Muslim woman to fund the jihad either, see San Diego and Minnesota and Virginia.
Source: Minneapolis woman gets probation in terrorism case — at prosecution’s urging
A Minneapolis woman who sent money to the militant group al-Shabab in Somalia was sentenced to five years’ probation on Wednesday after she cooperated with prosecutors, who said the light sentence would send a message to community members who shunned the woman yet supported other defendants who remained defiant.
Amina Mohamud Esse, 43, pleaded guilty in 2014 to one count of conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. She faced up to 15 years in prison, but prosecutors sought probation because she provided substantial assistance to the government.
“I accept responsibility for what I did,” Esse told the judge through an interpreter. “I’m willing to do all I can for the rest of my life to correct the mistakes I did.”
Her cooperation included nearly 60 meetings and phone calls with authorities, as well as testimony in the trial against ringleaders of an online network of women who used an internet chat room to raise thousands of dollars for al-Shabab, which the U.S. says is involved in terrorism.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Kovats said Esse was the 21st person to be sentenced in terrorism cases in Minnesota in the last five years. The sentences have ranged from probation to 35 years in prison.
Kovats noted Esse’s case is the first in which his office has recommended probation, saying it would send a message that “working with the U.S. is the right thing to do, even when the loudest community voices don’t seem to agree.
”The watch on the wall sounding ALARM
( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )
You have to give Haroon Syed credit for good taste, but nonetheless, his remedy for this Elton John concert was a bit extreme.
“Judge Michael Topolski QC adjourned sentencing until June 8 for a probation and psychiatric report to be done.”
Of course, because Western authorities always assume that jihadis must be insane. They assume that Islam is a Religion of Peace, and so anyone who plots mass murder in its name has to be crazy, right?
“Teenager admits plotting terror attack on Elton John concert in Hyde Park,” by Tom Powell, Evening Standard, April 27, 2017:
A teenager faces jail after plotting a bomb attack on an Elton John concert in Hyde Park.
Haroon Syed, 19, from Hounslow, pleaded guilty on Thursday at the Old Bailey to a charge of preparation of terrorist acts between April and September last year after a last-ditch attempt to get his case thrown out failed.
The court heard how Syed tried to get weapons online, including a bomb vest or explosives, and trawled the web to find a busy area in the capital such as Oxford Circus to launch a mass casualty attack.
Syed was caught chatting online with officers from the British Security Service who posed as a fellow extremist who could help him source the weapons.
Judge Michael Topolski QC adjourned sentencing until June 8 for a probation and psychiatric report to be done. He said Syed faced a “discretionary life sentence”.
As Syed was being drawn in by agents, his older brother was jailed for plotting an Islamic State-inspired Poppy Day attack.
At an earlier hearing, the court heard how key evidence was gathered from Syed’s communications with the fake contact Abu Yusuf via mobile phone and social media.
Syed asked for “gear” for his “op” and when asked to give details, he said he needed a machine gun and an explosive vest “so after some damage with machine gun do martyrdom … that’s what I’m planning to do.”
When Abu Yusuf said it would be costly, the defendant told him he was “broke” but pressed on, saying: “You have to find out the price for the machine gun, any gun.”
Initially Syed cried off meeting his contact, complaining that he was being followed by police who will “have eyes on me if I come”.
An officer pretended to be Abu Yusuf when they did finally get together at a Costa Coffee in Slough and their conversation was taped.
Throughout August, the discussions continued about making or getting a bomb and acquiring a gun, even though Syed confessed he had never used one before.
On August 30, Syed stressed that he needed a “portable” device, saying: “I might put the bomb in the train and then I’m going to jump out so the bomb explodes on the train … So ask the brother if he can make that type of bomb with button.”
Meanwhile, he researched targets and they arranged to pick up the bomb in exchange for £150 the following week.
Syed asked Abu Yusuf to make sure there were lots of nails in it and added: “I was thinking of Oxford Street … If I go to prison, I go to prison. If I die, I die, you understand.”
He searched the internet for IS, past terrorist attacks, and potential locations which included an Elton John concert in Hyde Park on September 11 last year.
Police moved in to arrest the defendant at his home on September 8 and his phone was seized. Asked for the password to unlock the device, Syed said: “Yeah I.S.I.S – you like that?”
In legal papers prepared for his defence, Syed was described as “highly vulnerable due to family history, lack of education, addiction to violent online games and the arrest and imprisonment of his brother”.
He was groomed by radicals online but he never intended to carry out an attack as his chats with the agent were a “fantasy to see how far it would go”, according to his defence statement.
Syed entered his guilty plea in the wake of an unsuccessful attempt to either get the case thrown out, or exclude the key evidence from the online chat.
His lawyer Mark Summers QC argued he should have been given help by the Prevent de-radicalisation group rather than steered in the opposite direction.
He said: “The proper response of the State should have been to engage Prevent to help this young man, to steer him away from the path it was feared he was going down, rather than guiding him down it.”…
The watchman on ,the wall sounding the ALARM
Portland, Oregon: Organizers cancel 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, after protesters threaten to shut it down over Republican participation
By Pamela Geller - April 27, 2017
( The threat to our FREEDOM grows greater every day!!!!! Were are the free American patriots?
Any way you look at this we are going to have to deal with this or lose our freedom, our rights, and our country to the socialist!!!!!
If they want violence then we give them violence, we have spent some around ten years trying to do things peacefully and legally according to the law!! what do we get threats and violence against us!! No more if this the way they want to go it is our duty as a FREE PEOPLE to protect our freedom, choice
is ours FREEDOM, THE RULE OF LAW AND ,OUR CONSTITUTION! Or WILL IT BE SOCIALIST
Principals for a Free Society )
How the Left Destroys the Nation 33 Facebook Twitter Google+ Everyone everywhere is caving to leftist thuggery. As the authoritarian and fascist nature of the left is increasingly obvious, instead of standing up to them, Americans are validating their thuggery, which will only encourage more of it. This is the road to a totalitarian leftist dictatorship, with all dissenting voices brutalized. “Organizers cancel 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, after protesters threaten to shut it down,” by Jamie Hale, The Oregonian, April 26, 2017: A threatening email has derailed one of the Portland Rose Festival’s signature events, and spurred new debate about the ongoing political protests in Portland. Organizers of the 82 nd Avenue of Roses Parade announced Tuesday that the event will be canceled, for fear that the east Portland parade could be disrupted by “the type of riots which happen in downtown Portland.” Originally scheduled this Saturday, April 29, the parade is meant to highlight the local community and businesses along Southeast 82 nd Avenue, aiming to turn around the negative perception many people have of the area. It started in 2007 and has since become a popular event on the Rose Festival calendar. This year’s parade was once again set to feature the Multnomah County Republican Party as one of the many groups slated to march, but that inclusion drew ire from some of the city’s left-leaning protest groups. At least two protests were planned for the day of the parade, one by Oregon Students Empowered and another by Direct Action Alliance . Both events were mentioned in an email sent to parade organizers on Saturday, threatening to shut down the event with hundreds of protesters in the street. “You have seen how much power we have downtown and that the police cannot stop us from shutting down roads so please consider your decision wisely,” the anonymous email said, telling organizers they could cancel the Republican group’s registration or else face action from protesters. “This is non-negotiable.” The parade is organized by the 82 nd Avenue of Roses Business Association, a part of the neighborhood business organization Venture Portland. Representatives from neither organization returned calls for comment. The cancelation isn’t necessarily a win for the protest groups. Jacob Bureros, an organizer with the Direct Action Alliance, said the organization – which intended to speak out against fascism and white supremacy during the parade – is sad to hear the news. “We are disappointed that the parade was canceled,” he said. “We’re members of this community and this is an awesome parade.” James Buchal, chairman of the Multnomah County Republican Party, said his group was ready to march despite the protesters. He said the party had no hand in cancelling the event, and was taken by surprise when they heard the news. After seeing the email last weekend, they had no plans to back out. “We weren’t willing to just walk away quietly,” he said. “The next thing we knew the whole thing was canceled.” Organizers pulled out after contacting Portland police, according to Rich Jarvis, spokesman for the Rose Festival Foundation. When police said they couldn’t offer any additional security for the parade, organizers decided to cancel it due to safety concerns. “The showdown was imminent,” Jarvis said. “They were boxed into a corner, they simply had no choice. In order to avoid a violent outbreak, they had to cancel the parade.”…
A video from a mall in Dallas Fort Worth is going viral this week, and the footage is extremely disturbing.
According to American Military News, the footage shows a mall cop try to kick a Navy SEAL out of a Texas mall because he was talking about religion in a private conversation.
After hearing the combat veteran talking privately about the Gospel to his friends, the mall cop interrupts them and says that they aren’t allowed to discuss religion on private property.
He then threatens to charge them with criminal trespassing if they don’t leave.
That’s when things get messy.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=338&v=qeFR7vGApb4
This fight is not over… but it IS without your help!
But your help is needed to stop the far-left and the 1% in their corporate board rooms from dictating what speech can and cannot be said or thought.
Please help fight the all out assault. It’s not too late!
... See More
This is an outrage. If you don’t step and fetchit for Islam, be prepared to be sued and lose. Not only did the victims of this Islamic supremacist lawsuit have to pay $12,000 “for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect”; they must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.” Welcome to 1984, or should I say الف وتسعمائة واربعة وثم.
When can the infidels sue the Muslim world for the bloodshed, genocide and hate their ideology mandates? When can we sue for the hateful verses that call for slaughter of the unbeliever? When can we sue for the oppression and subjugation of non-Muslims under Muslim law? When can we sue for incalculable cost in security apparatus, TSA, law enforcement, intel agencies and attendant costs (not to mention the loss of our freedoms) because of Islamic terror?
Canada increasingly is unlivable for those yearning to be free.
Now the small landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to a Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.
Human Rights Tribunal rules Brampton landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000
By Michele Mandel, Toronto Sun April 26, 2017:
It didn’t help his case that he shared a joke about a devout Muslim on his Facebook page.
Now the small landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to an Arab Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario also found that he “harassed them and created a poisoned housing environment.”
His sins? John Alabi refused to remove his shoes when showing the bedroom where the couple prayed and while he always gave them the mandated 24-hour notice before showings, he didn’t always provide the five-minute heads-up they’d requested to ensure the wife was modestly dressed and they weren’t in the midst of their five daily prayers.
“There was absolutely no evidence that the applicants’ requests for additional notice and for the removal of shoes in this case were an attempt by them to impose their way of life on the respondent or anyone else,” ruled vice chair Jo-Anne Pickel. “(They) were merely making simple requests for the accommodation of their religious practices … their requests easily could have been met without any hardship to the respondent, let alone any undue hardship as that term is used in human rights law.”
In December 2014, Walid Madkour and his wife Heba Ismail moved from Montreal into Alabi’s ground-floor apartment. Following several disputes, including the couple allegedly wanting their landlord to be quiet after 10 p.m., they agreed to terminate the lease on Feb. 28, 2015.
In the meantime, Alabi tried to rent out the unit. Madkhour wanted a one-hour notification of any showing in addition to the 24-hour notice.
Alabi told him that by law, only 24 hours was necessary. Madkhour accused him of “racism and violation of our civil rights:” Since his landlord was well aware that Ismail was unemployed and always home, “he considered it harassment for (Alabi) to continue to say that he would enter the premises without permission.”
Alabi texted back: “Welcome to Ontario, Canada.”
The landlord told the hearing that he meant that apartment viewing rules were different in Ontario than in Quebec where the couple had last lived. The human rights tribunal saw it as another example of discrimination.
That same evening, Ismail heard loud pounding on the steps outside their door; Alabi said he was just shovelling the snow; she said it was intimidating and frightening.
The couple called police.
They were told that contrary to their understanding, their landlord had a right to show the apartment when they were home. As a “courtesy,” Alabi agreed to give them five minutes notice in addition to the 24 hours. But that negotiated detente ended two days later after Ismail videotaped Alabi refusing to remove his shoes when entering their bedroom. “She said it was disrespectful and an act of racism.”
Alabi told the hearing that his shoes had never been an issue before and accused his tenants of trying to set up roadblocks to his renting their flat. He also accused them of trying to impose their way of life on him and said “the fact that someone belongs to a religion does not permit them to inconvenience others.”
The tribunal didn’t see it that way — especially after the tenants introduced their landlord’s Facebook page that had a “joke” about a devout Arab Muslim that they found offensive. Alabi told the hearing “he had freedom of speech and could post what he wanted on his Facebook page … He did not share the post to attack anyone. He said he shared it only because it made him laugh.”
Be careful what you post online — Pickel saw it as further evidence of his bias.
“When considered together, I find that the comment ‘welcome to Ontario, Canada,’ the making of loud pounding noises outside the applicants’ door shortly after making that comment, and (Alabi)’s refusal to remove his shoes when entering (their) prayer space amounted to harassment under the Code.”
In addition to paying them $6,000 each for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect, Alabi must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.”
The watchman on the wal sounding the wall sounding the ALARM
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Thursday that China has threatened to impose sanctions on North Korea if it conducts further nuclear tests.
“We know that China is in communications with the regime in Pyongyang,” Tillerson said on Fox News Channel. “They confirmed to us that they had requested the regime conduct no further nuclear test.”
Tillerson said China also told the U.S. that it had informed North Korea “that if they did conduct further nuclear tests, China would be taking sanctions actions on their own.” (Read more from “Tillerson Says China Asked North Korea to Stop Nuclear Tests” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/tillerson-says-china-asked-north-korea-to-stop-nuclear-tests/
Thursday evening on the radio, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin discussed a report from The Daily Caller illustrating how the Obama administration lied to promote its environmental agenda.
The administration allegedly manipulated climate stats and reports to influence public opinion. From the article:
Former Energy Department Undersecretary Steven Koonin told The Wall Street Journal Monday that bureaucrats within former President Barack Obama’s administration spun scientific data to manipulate public opinion.
“What you saw coming out of the press releases about climate data, climate analysis, was, I’d say, misleading, sometimes just wrong,” Koonin said, referring to elements within the Obama administration he said were responsible for manipulating climate data.
“We were lied to,” Levin said. “We were lied to in order to advance an ideology.”
And why? Why else — Big Government insatiable greed and lust for power.
Listen:
“It’s an attack on capitalism,” Levin explained. “This is just the latest effort by the Left — the socialist Left, the Marxist Left — to nationalize economic decision making.”
Climate change is a greater national security threat than terrorism, many on the Left tell us. And some on the Right buy into their “myth,” Levin points out.
At the end of the day, this is utopian statism. (For more from the author of “‘We Were Lied To’: Levin Torches Obama’s Climate BS Artists” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/lied-levin-torches-obamas-climate-bs-artists/
Exclusive Interview: Trump ‘Absolutely’ Looking At Breaking Up 9th Circuit
By Aleen Realmuto 0 President Trump said Wednesday that he has “absolutely” considered proposals that would split up the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where judges have blocked two of his executive actions, The Washington Examiner reports. “Absolutely, I have,” Trump said of considering 9th Circuit breakup proposals during a far-ranging interview with the Washington Examiner at the White House. “There are many people that want to break up the 9th Circuit. It’s outrageous.” “Everybody immediately runs to the 9th Circuit. And we have a big country. We have lots of other locations. But they immediately run to the 9th Circuit. Because they know that’s like, semi-automatic,” Trump said. His comments came one day after U.S. District Judge William Orrick temporarily blocked Trump’s efforts to withhold funds from any municipality that refuses to cooperate with immigration enforcement officers. Orrick, based in San Francisco, argued that Trump had overstepped his authority in January when he directed the Justice Department to put immigration-related conditions on grants for so-called sanctuary cities that may not be directly related to law enforcement. The case, if appealed, would go before the 9th Circuit. Other judges on the court halted two different versions of an executive action aimed at tightening vetting requirements for immigrants from Middle Eastern countries, because both actions called for a temporary suspension of some immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries. “The language could not be any clearer. I mean, the language on the ban, it reads so easy that a reasonably good student in the first grade will fully understand it. And they don’t even mention the words in their rejection on the ban,” Trump said. “And the same thing with this [sanctuary city decision]. I mean, when you have people that are being enabled to commit crime. And in San Francisco, when you look at Kate Steinle being shot and here is the court, you know, right in that same general area. And when you look at a Kate Steinle, when you look at so many other things.” Trump was referring to a young woman in San Francisco, a sanctuary city, who was gunned down by an illegal immigrant in 2015. He has frequently pointed to Steinle’s murder as evidence that sanctuary city policies can be harmful to American citizens. “Sanctuary cities have been very, very dangerous, very, very bad. And, you know, we’ve done a great job on law enforcement, we’ve done a great job at the border,” Trump said. “And all of our most talented people say sanctuary cities are a disaster.” Republicans have long criticized the 9th Circuit for its perceived liberal leanings and its enormous geographical reach, which has led to bureaucratic backlogs. GOP lawmakers have repeatedly introduced legislation that would carve out several states under the 9th Circuit’s jurisdiction and create a new court designed to lighten the Ninth’s caseload. The 9th Circuit hears appeals from courts in nine West Coast states and two U.S. territories. Of its 25 active judges, 18 were appointed by Democratic presidents. Trump said Wednesday that opponents of his policies have engaged in “judge shopping” in their efforts to find a sympathetic judicial platform for their partisan objections. “You see judge shopping, or what’s gone on with these people, they immediately run to the 9th Circuit,” Trump said. “It’s got close to an 80 percent reversal period, and what’s going on in the 9th Circuit is a shame.”
Conservative author Ann Coulter announced Wednesday she will not be giving her speech at the University of California, Berkeley following the Young America’s Foundation (YAF) backing out of the event.
Coulter alleges that YAF “ordered the lawyer not [to] file for [a] court order,” which would have compelled the school to reserve a room for the speaker, and that the Berkeley College Republicans, one of the parties sponsoring the author, were bound to follow YAF’s lead, according to Fox News.
The College Republicans and YAF sued UC Berkeley on Monday for canceling the author’s speech. But YAF had second thoughts, according to Coulter.
“I looked over my shoulder and my allies had joined the other team,” Coulter said in an email, according to Fox News. “I think I’m still going to Berkeley, but there will be no speech.”
“I thought I might just stroll around the graveyard of free speech in America,” Coulter wrote in an email to The Daily Caller News Foundation. (Read more from “Ann Coulter Cancels Speech After Losing Her Backing Over Violence Fears” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/ann-coulter-cancels-speech-losing-backing-violence-fears/
Demosthenes, the Athenian rhetorician and champion of liberty, pointed out around 355 B.C. that residents of Athens were free to praise Sparta’s regime, but Spartans were banned from praising Athens.
In 1689, the British passed a law guaranteeing freedom of speech in Parliament. A century later, French revolutionaries incorporated into law the Declaration of the Rights of Man, which established free speech as a universal right. Two years later, the Americans ratified the First Amendment, which guarantees that the state shall not infringe on the right to free speech. Roughly a century and half later, in 1948, the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which says, “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression….”
I mention all of this because every time I read or hear about the pathetic state of affairs at the University of California, Berkeley — where conservative speakers and rabble-rousers alike are banned from speaking lest they be assaulted by a mob — journalists and other commentators insist on pointing out the irony that this is all happening “where the Free Speech Movement was born.”
Yes, I know there was a thing called the Free Speech Movement. And, yes, its members and leaders talked a good deal about free speech.
But the movement for free speech is thousands of years old and runs like a deep river across the landscape of Western Civilization. (Read more from “Berkeley Didn’t Birth ‘Free Speech’ but Seems Intent to Bury It” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/berkeley-didnt-birth-free-speech-seems-intent-bury/
The Democrats have proven time and time again that they show no regard for anyone who does not agree with them. They are not to be trusted and have no problem sacrificing their own party if they have a slightly different opinion.
Democrats have proven to be something else, too. They have managed to become the world’s most successful hate group. Watching them in action is enough to make your stomach turn. This anonymously-written meme, explains it perfectly:
Then, the New York Times managed to publish one of the most repulsive articles to date. Even without the context of the author, this article is by far one of the absolute most hypocritical articles you will EVER read. The title? “What Racial Terms Make You Cringe?”
The piece features a bunch of words and names that the author considers to be 100 percent CRINGEWORTHY! The very first word is “ethnic.” According to the article, “On the one hand, this is about the normalization of whiteness — if you’re not white you’re something else. On the other hand, it speaks to how uncomfortable some people are to even discuss race.”
I hope you have some aspirin handy, because the previous quote may have given you a headache. We’re supposed to believe that if someone is labeled as ETHNIC, that means that we are “normalizing white.” What is she even talking about?
The rest of the article reads in much the same way, like a book written by an angry 2-year-old. Allegedly HARMFUL words like “illegal immigrant,” “urban,” and “non-white” are thrown around like pity party confetti.
Now that you have an idea of how bad that piece is, let’s discuss the author. None other than Rachel Dolezal wrote that piece. You guys remember Rachel, right?
If not, she is the one who pretended to be black long enough to serve as president of the NAACP. She lied about how she was a victim of hate crimes, and resigned when her parents blew the whistle on her charade.
The idea that someone like Rachel producing written content for the masses shines a light on exactly how the Democrats manage to be one of the most successful hate groups on planet Earth. The Dems are supported by MOST journalistic outlets. Having this kind of support means their propaganda can fill the waves of our TVs, radios, smartphone content, and more.
They are able to reach more people and influence our nation’s politically lazy people. The main claim we hear is about how they are FIGHTING for the equality and freedom of ALL PEOPLE. If you are politically lazy this will draw you in and, bam, you are involved in something that you should have stayed away from.
On their false premise, the Left goes out of their way to ridicule people who think differently than they do. They shut down speakers at colleges and public events who simply want to express their non-radical political beliefs. At the same time, the Left embraces people with the most dangerous, radical beliefs on the planet: Islam and Sharia law.
The Left needs to stop, and they need to stop NOW. As time passes, more people are standing up to these “bully-victims.” Hopefully, we can see a shift where true freedom and free speech is spread throughout out country under President Trump.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyunoG3EgAI
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
Video http://www.barenakedislam.com/
h/t Davo
The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM
( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )
“Air Force chaplain Walid Habash has been assigned to begin reviewing slides from Dunleavy’s lesson material later this week. Habash, however, Sperry reported, received his Islamic education from a Muslim Brotherhood school in Virginia, the Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, which was raided by federal agents in 2002 as part of a post-9/11 terrorism investigation.”
This is unconscionable, and a clear sign that the Trump administration has done nothing to drain the Pentagon swamp. Whether it is unaware of what is going on at the Pentagon, or unable to counter it, remains unclear.
CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
Hamas-linked CAIR should be nowhere near the Pentagon, much less dictating demands for Pentagon dhimmis to rush to fulfill. And a Muslim Brotherhood-educated Air Force chaplain is going to review Dunleavy’s material. If anyone is unsure what Habash’s judgment will be, I have a bridge to sell you.
“Pentagon yields to CAIR demand to ‘review’ counter-terror training,” by Art Moore, World Net Daily, April 27, 2017:
Responding to a demand by the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Pentagon will formally review the content of a counter-terrorism training program taught to special forces by a private contractor.
As WND reported earlier this month, Patrick Dunleavy, a former deputy inspector general for the New York State Department of Corrections, is an instructor for a course in the United States Air Force Special Operations School called “The Dynamics of International Terrorism.”
CAIR, which has been accused by the Justice Department of supporting terrorism and is currently banned from outreach activities by the FBI, charged Dunleavy is “Islamophobic” and holds “personal prejudice against Islam and Muslims.”
Now, reports Paul Sperry in FrontPage magazine, Dunleavy says he fears his course might not get a fair hearing, because the Pentagon has assigned the review to a Muslim military chaplain who graduated from a radical Saudi-funded Islamic school raided by federal agents after 9/11 on suspicion of terrorist activities.
Dunleavy told Sperry the Pentagon’s original choice for the job was an even more radical military with ties to an imam with a history of ministering to Muslims later convicted of terrorism.
CAIR has been at the forefront of an effort under the Obama administration to “purge” the military and federal government of “anti-Muslim” subject-matter experts and materials.
Dunleavy, the author of the book “The Fertile Soil of Jihad: Terrorism’s Prison Connection,” has testified as an expert witness before the House Committee on Homeland Security concerning the threat of Islamic radicalization in the U.S. prison system. He has served as a consultant for the FBI and the International Association of Chiefs of Police on the National Data Exchange Program. He also has been a featured speaker at the Army’s Counter Terrorism Conference.
But CAIR, regarded by the FBI as a Hamas front in the U.S., was designated by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror-funding plot and by the United Arab Emirates as a terrorist organization.
According to evidence entered in the terror-financing case, CAIR was founded by figures associated with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, the worldwide movement that has stated its intent to transform the U.S. into an Islamic state. More than a dozen CAIR leaders have been charged or convicted of terrorism-related crimes.
CAIR has sued the authors of a WND Books exposé, “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” which documented the group’s radical ties. A trial in the case is expected to commence this fall.
Air Force officials already have reviewed all of Dunleavy’s presentations and told him they found nothing offensive.
Earlier this month, Dunleavy told WND in an email he has never had complaints from students.
“I was somewhat perplexed by the CAIR accusation,” he said. “Having taught a class on ‘Prison Radicalization’ in the USAF Special Operations School’s Dynamics in International Terrorism for over five years to a group of students which included members of every branch of the U.S. military, FBI special agents, and other federal law enforcement agencies, there has never been any negative reviews of my class presentation, nor were any offensive statements or material found in my lesson plan after review by the USAF at Hurlburt Field.
“Unfortunately, ‘labeling’ is now a convenient close-minded way to besmirch someone without ever actually hearing them speak,” Dunleavy said.
In a March 17 letter to Lt. Gen. Marshall Webb, CAIR noted that, in 2012, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey ordered the U.S. military to “scour its training material to ensure it doesn’t contain anti-Islamic content.”
“Mr. Dunleavy’s public statements and professional affiliations indicate that he is part of the issue Dempsey was trying to resolve,” CAIR said.
Radical education
Sperry reported that after Webb received the CAIR letter he ordered Special Operations School commandant Lt. Col. Christopher Portele to initiate a review. Dunleavy believes the top brass are largely unaware of the extent of CAIR’s terrorism ties.
“I’m sure they don’t have a complete knowledge of CAIR or other Muslim Brotherhood groups,” he told Sperry.
Air Force chaplain Walid Habash has been assigned to begin reviewing slides from Dunleavy’s lesson material later this week.
Habash, however, Sperry reported, received his Islamic education from a Muslim Brotherhood school in Virginia, the Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, which was raided by federal agents in 2002 as part of a post-9/11 terrorism investigation…
The watchman on the wall sounding ,the ALARM
