William M. Finley's Posts (2815)

Sort by

A Purge Is Happening Right Now in America—You Are Not Exempt! Don’t Ignore This!

Friday, January 12, 2018 12:42
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Stumbleupon
Share on Reddit
mail_inline_share.png

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

By Lisa Haven

 

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More...

If you are a freedom loving patriot who values American principles, then you arelikely already aware of the massive amount of censorship happening on social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Google and other globalists linked organizations which target individuals who bring attention to their continuous, creepy corruption.

Considering Donald Trump is now president, censorship has ignited and been set ablaze all across the world wide web. Alternative media news outlets are having to work double, with less pay, in order to get the truth out, while progressive news websites are being spring-boarded to the tops of search engines.

Well, I’ve Had ENOUGH! It’s about dang time we expose the corruption of these fakes and at least have a fair fighting chance to win the affection of the sleeping public who are continually being censored from the truth.

If there ever was a video that needs to go viral, it would be this one! Please forward this message to everyone you know… Otherwise, we could be looking at the rise of a ‘globalists network of brainwashed goons…’

video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=17&v=Ii0sVn_k

Read more…

LEAKED MEMO: DREAMers Are ‘Critical’ To Dems ‘Future Electoral Success’

The Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund circulated a memo on Monday calling illegal immigrants brought here at a young age -- so-called…
Read more…

NIGERIA IS A SHIT HOLE COUNTRY...

-4:37
830,927 Views
Read more…

Hillary’s Planned Executive Orders Leaked, Democrats Turning Pro-Trump In Waves As They Read It

Hillary’s Planned Executive Orders Leaked, Democrats Turning Pro-Trump In Waves As They Read It

Advertisement

It would have been worse than we imagined!https://25002-presscdn-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Capture-1-300x191.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" width="600" height="381" />

It would have been worse than we imagined!

Let us all exhale knowing that Hillary Clinton did not win this election. Her loss was a major win for the world, the United States, but more importantly, the American people.

Presidential powers allow for nearly unlimited capabilities, which is what led to Obama bypassing Congress and essentially doing whatever he wanted for eight long years. As bad as Obama was, Clinton pledged several times to go beyond Obama and use executive actions for anything Congress would not allow.

Had Hillary Clinton won this election, she would have possessed the power to carry out many of her agendas that would have literally destroyed this country. A Democratic insider leaked Hillary’s list of Executive Orders that she planned to sign into law. Here they are:

  • A pathway to citizenship for a minimum of 4 million illegal immigrants.
  • Work permits to a minimum of 5 million undocumented immigrants.
  • Ban all guns of any kind. Begin with assault rifles and work down to a nationwide hand-gun ban. She wanted to mimic Australia’s plan.
  • The “gun show loophole” would also be closed. She planned to allow people to sue gun manufacturers if they were killed by any gun in the United States.
  • Add more penalties to those that are not covered under the Affordable Care Act that she created. She would have kept 95% of Obama’s policies.
  • Continue to allow late-term abortions.

By now, many of us are well-aware that we dodged a major bullet with Hillary Clinton. This is just the shortlist of things she wanted early on in her first term, but it could have been much worse.

Eight years of Barack Obama has been bad enough, but it appears that Hillary Clinton was planning to set up a dictatorship in this country and suppress all of our rights afforded to us by our Founding Fathers.

How does it make you feel seeing what Hillary Clinton planned to do to this country?

It would have been worse than we imagined!https://25002-presscdn-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Capture-1-300x191.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" width="600" height="381" />

It would have been worse than we imagined!

Let us all exhale knowing that Hillary Clinton did not win this election. Her loss was a major win for the world, the United States, but more importantly, the American people.

Presidential powers allow for nearly unlimited capabilities, which is what led to Obama bypassing Congress and essentially doing whatever he wanted for eight long years. As bad as Obama was, Clinton pledged several times to go beyond Obama and use executive actions for anything Congress would not allow.

Had Hillary Clinton won this election, she would have possessed the power to carry out many of her agendas that would have literally destroyed this country. A Democratic insider leaked Hillary’s list of Executive Orders that she planned to sign into law. Here they are:

A pathway to citizenship for a minimum of 4 million illegal immigrants.

  • Work permits to a minimum of 5 million undocumented immigrants.
  • Ban all guns of any kind. Begin with assault rifles and work down to a nationwide hand-gun ban. She wanted to mimic Australia’s plan.
  • The “gun show loophole” would also be closed. She planned to allow people to sue gun manufacturers if they were killed by any gun in the United States.
  • Add more penalties to those that are not covered under the Affordable Care Act that she created. She would have kept 95% of Obama’s policies.
  • Continue to allow late-term abortions.

By now, many of us are well-aware that we dodged a major bullet with Hillary Clinton. This is just the shortlist of things she wanted early on in her first term, but it could have been much worse.

Eight years of Barack Obama has been bad enough, but it appears that Hillary Clinton was planning to set up a dictatorship in this country and suppress all of our rights afforded to us by our Founding Fathers.

How does it make you feel seeing what Hillary Clinton planned to do to this country?

Read more…

Tennessee: Christian university submits to terror-linked CAIR, cancels speakers critical of Islam

Free speech is dead even on so-called Christian college campuses. Source: Mae Beavers’ summit nixed over anti-Muslim concerns | WKRN News 2 h/t @dailyrollcall (one of the cancelled speakers)

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) – A Tennessee university has canceled a Republican candidate for governor’s summit amid criticisms that its speakers were anti-Muslim.

A campaign news release from ex-Sen. Mae Beavers says Trevecca Nazarene University canceled the Jan. 25 Homeland Security Summit.

Council on American-Islamic Relations spokesman Ibrahim Hopper tells The Tennessean the speakers were a “who’s who of Islamophobes,” including Bill French, under pen name Bill Warner, Cathy Hinners and John Guandolo.

Trevecca spokeswoman Mandy Crow told the newspaper the event appears to have an agenda beyond a political campaign, and would distract from Trevecca’s commitment to community building, education and support of diverse enrollment at the Christian school.

Beavers said Trevecca “abandoned Biblical principles in order embrace political correctness.” Beavers, one of five major Republicans and two Democrats running for governor, attended Trevecca.



And then there’s the Rogues gallery of terror-tied CAIR leaders. A Who’s Who of Hamas Terror Supporters. Not one major news outlet mentions that when citing the FBI-banned, UAE designated terrorist group.

Read more…

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

Police Times

Just another WordPress site

Late Night Raid On Michigan Mosque Nets 11 ISIS Terrorists and More Than 40 Vests

( Muslims do not assimilate!!! They infiltrate!! )

A mosque in a small town outside of Dearborn, Michigan has been raided by a joint task force from the FBI, Homeland Security and the ATF. According to preliminary reports from the scene, which is closed off for more than a mile, 11 “very dangerous men” who aren’t supposed to be in America at all have been apprehended plotting what would have been our next 9-11.

Agent Nesmith Variacles of the FBI explains:

“We found more than 40 suicide vests that would have killed anyone in a 300 foot radius. That’s basically a football field. These bombs were high-tech, plastic and non-detectable. They could have blown up 40 malls, sports venues, buildings…whatever they wanted. The good news is, they were a week out and we caught them.”

The mosque was actively recruiting American teenage Muslims to help carry out its plan to murder “as many as 100K infidels.” That number means either a mass attack spread across the country or a major sports venue going down with all 40 vests going off in tandem. The Department of Refugee Affairs seems to think it would have been the latter:

“We believe they would have hit a football game next weekend, probably the Patriots in Foxboro. A liberal state is more likely to overlook a bunch of brown-skinned guys in overstuffed coats on a frigid Massachusetts night than they are to gove them a hard time. Especially if the vests don’t set off metal detectors.

We would be waking up to 100K dead Americans and ‘Boston Strong’ would be the war cry of the 21st century.”

Source: The Last Line Of Defense

Read more…

Republicans's video.

SHARE!!

Lori Deis shared The Trump Republicans's video.

This is a Sh&Thole right here in America and many more in liberal ran cities and no outrage but when President Trump says why keep bringing in people from Sh&tholes there is outrage, when we cannot even take care of the Americans already living in Sh&tholes

Video https://www.facebook.com/TheTrumpRepublicans/videos/572673643077630/

-0:36
California Under liberal leadership.
Read more…

Guantánamo enemy combatants claim Trump’s ‘anti-Muslim bias’ fuels their detention

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

Not jihad slaughter. Not sharia-based savagery. Not the murder of our soldiers and citizens. Anti-Muslim bias, that’s what keeps these savages locked up.

And that is accordance with their savage teachings, If you don’t convert, you must be conquered. An opposition to Islam is anti-Muslim bias.

These devout savages attack, throw their urines and feces at the guards while we provide them with qurans, prayer mats, and a soccer field.

The number of former Guantanamo detainees suspected of ‘returning to the fight’ has doubled.

Guantánamo inmates claim Trump’s ‘anti-Muslim bias’ fuels their detention

Ed Pilkington in New York, The Guardian, January 11, 2018:

Eleven Guantánamo inmates are challenging their indefinite detention in the US military camp in Cuba on grounds that Donald Trump’s defiant pledge to keep all remaining detainees permanently locked up is fuelled by hostility towards Muslims.

The inmate’s petition, filed on Thursday in a federal court in Washington, falls on the 16th anniversary of the arrival of the first 20 detainees to Guantánamo. The prisoners were brought in shackles from Afghanistan on 11 January 2002 dressed in distinctive orange jumpsuits.

Some of the petitioners in the new filing have themselves been held on the Cuban base almost since the beginning; others have been detained for 10 years. None of them has ever been charged, and all know that unless the courts intervene they could remain in their cells until they die.

In a memorable phrase, they say that “the aura of forever hangs heavier than ever”.

At the heart of the legal petition is the claim that President Trump has taken a radically new approach towards the treatment of the 41 prisoners who remain at Guantánamo. The inmates argue that his stance is defiant in spirit, arbitrary in nature, and fueled by his “suspicion and antipathy” towards Muslims.

The petitioners quote medical experts who have compared the prolonged indefinite imprisonment at Guantánamo to sensory deprivation and psychological torture. “Prisoners are medicated for depression and anxiety brought on by acute despair.”

The inmates are basing their challenge on two legal points. They claim that indiscriminate indefinite detention is illegal under the due process clause of the US constitution.

The second argument is that the justification for never-ending detention under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) was that it was needed to prevent committed enemies of the US returning to the battlefield. But the petitioners claim that justification has begun to unravel.

On the campaign trail Trump said of Guantánamo that he would “load it up with some bad dudes”.

Shortly before his inauguration he pledged in a tweet to block any further releases on grounds that all the 41 were “extremely dangerous people”.

That threat has come to pass. Pardiss Kebriaei, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights who represents one of the petitioners, Sharqawi Al Hajj of Yemen, who has been detained for 15 years, said that all moves towards release have ground to a halt since Trump came in.

“There’s nothing happening. It’s an entirely static situation, and that kind of indefinite detention without charge is intolerable, it cannot be allowed to continue,” she said.

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Read more…

The Daily Jot - Words mean things

Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
Words mean things
NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Friday, January 12, 2018
President Donald Trump is once again facing a firestorm. This time, over his remarks about not wanting immigrants from what he called "S**Thole nations." The media and his opponents wasted no time in translating his words into the word "racist." Whether it was taken out of context or not, this President should know by now that every word he says comes under great scrutiny, and most of his words will be twisted and used against him. He should, therefore, curb his word usage and be more intentional about the messages he is sending. Otherwise, his effectiveness will erode. If politicians believe Trump to be racist, they will not want to be seen with him or work with him. The Bible has a lot to say about words.
 
Christ said in Matthew 7:12, " Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets." It's called the Golden Rule. It starts out by treating others the way you would like to be treated. This is how we as Christians need to view the world. It should be a foundation of our life's philosophy, something etched in our heart. Christ also said in Matthew 15:11, " Not that which goes into the mouth defiles a man; but that which comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man." No matter how much we want change in this country from the previous ways, we also must not abandon our Christian principles in the process. Accountability is key.
 
Proverbs says a lot about the words we use. 18:21, "Death and life are in the power of the tongue." 12:18, "There is that speaks like the piercings of a sword: but the tongue of the wise is health." 15:1, "A soft answer turns away wrath, but grievous words stir up anger." 13:3, "He that keeps his mouth keeps his life: but he that opens wide his lips shall have destruction." 10:19, "He that refrains his lips is wise." 25:11, "A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver." 29:20, "See a man that is hasty in his words? There is more hope of a fool than of him." There are many who believe our President's harshness is necessary and that some people may deserve it, but scripturally speaking, it cannot be justified.
 
James 3:5-8 says," Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasts great things. Behold, how great a forest a little fire kindles! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire by hell. For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and has been tamed by mankind: But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison." Curb your tongue, Mr. President. Words mean things and the meaner your words, the meaner you are portrayed, and the less you will be able to accomplish. 
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
Read more…

Racist” Trump Just Gave Martin Luther King Birthplace Biggest Boost Since 1929

0
Read more…

RECONSTRUCTION – PART 4



by Lanny Carruthers:

Part 4 of 6: Reconstruction

Once the War to Prevent Southern Independence was over, two forms of society were forced into a single country again. Radical Republican leader Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania proposed, unsuccessfully, that all former Confederates lose the right to vote for five years. In Arkansas rebel votes were denied the right to vote beginning in 1865 until a ruling by the Arkansas Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional. However, radicals adopted a new Arkansas constitution in 1868 which enfranchised blacks and disenfranchised rebels. It lasted until the Brooks-Baxter feud in 1874 between two rival Republican factions resulted in a new state constitution in 1875.

The Military Reconstruction Acts of 1867 were passed; they divided the South into five military districts with military leadership composed of former Union generals. The State of Tennessee was exempt from Reconstruction due to the large number of Union supporters and the fact that Tennessee had agreed to most of the demands from Radical Republicans enforcing Reconstruction (sounds like an Obamacare exemption). This military apparatus was used by Radical Republicans of the North to impose one form of society upon another form of society, in ways that would make most dictators envious.


By evidence of historical facts, buried in libraries, that are not taught in grade school and college classrooms, the country we know today is actually the forced creation of a country never envisioned by our founding fathers and the Constitution. Theoretically, all of the growth of government and a majority of laws since approximately 1861 could be ruled unconstitutional, and the United States could be deemed a dictatorship. After all, even the Russians and Venezuelans have elections. The President ignored a Supreme Court justice’s decision overturning his order suspending the writ of habeas corpus, and over the next few years allowed these new restrictions. He also imposed martial law in some border areas and curbed freedom of speech and the press. The aforementioned president was Abraham Lincoln…not President Trump.

Why were millions of acres of land granted to railroad companies instead of sold to railroad companies to fund Reconstruction and opportunities to freed blacks between 1850 and 1871? Banks believed that it would take years for railroad companies to repay their debts, and were reluctant to loan the railroad companies money. Besides, the war-ravaged railroads across the South needed to be rebuilt, and the region was broke. The only banks were operated by the Northeastern bankers controlled by the Radical Republicans. All ties together huh!?!  Land grants were received by railroads, and part of the land was sold to fund railroad construction. And to think President Trump was criticized for ending government overreach and returning government seized lands back to the State of Utah. Ironically many of these land grants to railroad companies were located in former Confederate states as evidenced by the Library of Congress map below.

(http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/riseind/railroad/grants.html).

The railroads were built to help ship Northern goods to rebuild the South that was destroyed by Sherman, Sheridan and the Union Army at Southern expense. Just think about all the billions spent by the U.S. to rebuild Afghanistan and Iraq after U.S. attacks.

https://www.thetrumptimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Lanny.jpg 730w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="198" />

Remember that plan about developing the West to be sympathetic to the North? Well it finally manifested itself during Reconstruction. The North expedited the development of the western territories at government expense, more so the people’s expense, with the help of subsidized railroad companies. This allowed the North to indoctrinate the western territories and impose the Northern form of society in what amounts to a territorial conquest. This development was not done by private investment groups or pioneers, but by the government pouring money into development.  (More on government directed and funded development in the next part of this series.)  In this way, the government could keep the southerners in check and force the Northern form of society on the defeated South.  Sounds eerily similar to the Democrats’ plan with illegal immigration today.

Andrew Carnegie has been celebrated as a great industrialist, and he amassed great wealth.  Carnegie and other Northern industrialists, such as shipping and railroad magnate Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller who controlled oil and other derivatives, as well as J. P. Morgan who controlled finance in the North recognized the South’s threat to their Northern interests in the late 1800s.  Does JPMorgan Chase & Co. ring a bell?  They devised the “Pittsburg-plus” system of charging higher rates to Southerners as opposed to Northern interests.  In 1889, when Andrew Carnegie toured the Southern steel industry in Birmingham, Alabama, he declared, “The South is Pennsylvania’s most formidable industrial enemy.”

Ten years later Carnegie’s mills were merged with and became the largest component of Pittsburgh-based U. S. Steel.  Six years later U. S. Steel acquired the largest Southern steel mills.  Carnegie then imposed what was called the “Birmingham Differential” of $3 per ton over the Pittsburgh quote.  To further dampen Alabama steel production, buyers of Birmingham steel were required to pay freight from Birmingham, plus a phantom charge as if the shipments were shipped from Pittsburgh.  President Woodrow Wilson’s administration, through the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), investigated the matter and concluded that Birmingham’s steel production costs were the lowest in the country and 26% below those of Pittsburgh. Yet U. S. Steel continued to require a $3 per ton “Birmingham Differential” on Alabama steel, which was raised to $5 after 1920.

It was not until a serious study was conducted in 1939, that rates for the same service in the South were found to be 39% higher than in the North, while those in the Southwestern region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and part of New Mexico) were determined to be 75% higher. The differentials were so discriminatory that remote Northern manufacturers could ship finished goods into the South at lower cost than Southern makers of the same items could distribute them within their own region. Three years later Carnegie demonstrated that racism was not limited to Southerners when he objected to black suffrage by saying, “Blacks were steeped in ignorance of political responsibilities to a degree impossible for northern people to imagine.” [Ezell, 182].

American Sugar, based in New York, controlled 98% of the refined market and sold under the still-familiar Domino brand.  They and other companies perpetuated the South’s dependence upon imports, or Northern tariff-protected manufacturers, for finished goods. These are just a few of many industrial and economic schemes to promote the Northern form of society against the South.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines civil war as, “a war between opposing groups of citizens of the same country.” Typically, civil wars are internal wars of the same country for control of government and society. To call the U.S.Civil War a civil war is a miscarriage of justice and history. While both sides had opposing views, only one side was fighting to control and impose its societal view – the North.  The South wanted nothing to do with the Union, and desired a peaceful secession, as evidenced in Hayne’s letters to President Buchanan before the War.

The South had an opposing view from the North on many issues…not just one. The South decided there was no compromise attainable and no reconciling of differences with the North, evidenced by many failed attempts. Therefore, the Southern states decided they wanted no part of the Union, no part of that form of society and seceded. I will leave it up to you what to call this war, but the War to Prevent Southern Independence sounds fitting. Or as Sen. Mason of Virginia aptly described it, “A war of sentiment and opinion by one form of society against another form of society.”

I went through a long history of the events surrounding Secession and what many consider the Civil War due to the complexity and general educational misconduct in teaching this era of American history. The modern day educational misconduct is called “contextualizing.” Contextualizing shapes history to fit one’s own narrative. As you read, I like to use records and documented quotes from people “back in the day(s)” and let them speak for themselves. You can say I used the ancestor of Twitter. You can’t delete history, unlike Twitter; you can only overlook what you don’t want to see.

Coming up next: Two Roosevelts, the New Deal Program/TVA, and Civil Rights Era.

Read more…

DEAR LORD THIS IS JUST DISGUSTINGLY WRONG, SICK AND
ATROCIOUS!!!!! I KNOW GOOD AMERICAN CITIZENS STRUGGLING SO HARD TO PAY THEIR BILLS AND FEED THEIR FAMILIES! PLEASE PRESIDENT TRUMP; GET THESE PARASITES THE HELL OUT OF AMERICA!

CALL YOUR REPS!

Taxpayer-funded federal benefits for illegal aliens while so many Americans are struggling...

Read more…

The Craziest Democrat Strategy Yet

thenationalpatriot.com

The Craziest Democrat Strategy Yet

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

According to Neil Sroka, a liberal activist and spokesmouth for “Democracy for America,” which sounds suspiciously like “Organizing for America,” the 2018 strategy for his party’s midterm success should include the impeachment of President Trump.

Here’s exactly what he said…

“Democrats should run on an inclusive, populist agenda of free college and paid family leave, but shouldn’t shy away from supporting impeachment.”

Oh…please make that the foremost plank in the liberal/socialist party strategy.

PLEASE!!!

To understand exactly what Sroka is saying, one must dig out their liberal super, double top secret decoder ring and give it a spin. Luckily, I keep mine right handy, so allow me to decipher his blather for you.

“Inclusive” in liberal speak means…inclusive of all socialist, big government, entitlement and anti-American thinkers, and EXCLUSIVE of anyone who believes in our Constitution, limited government and individual rights or self-reliance.

“Populist agenda,” in liberal speak means…mob rule that intimidates and suppresses those who, because of their belief in Capitalism, have actually made something of themselves, and have done so without reliance on the federal government.

“Free college and paid family leave,” in liberal speak means entitlement based on cradle to grave nannism and reliance on other people’s money.

See…socialism.

But…according to Sroka, and my super, double top secret liberal decoder ring…because all of that other crap failed them in 2016, based on its attempted fundamental transformation implementation over the previous 8 years…just impeach Trump.

That, in a nutshell, is what liberals are considering pinning all their hopes and dreams of a socialistic America on as we steam towards the 2018 midterm elections.

Can you say…desperation?

First of all…liberals would need to take 24 seats in the House and 2 in the Senate away from Republicans this November to hold a majority of Congress, and without that majority, they couldn’t impeach a dog catcher in Squatsville Kansas…much less a sitting President of these getting great again United States.

To be honest, I don’t even know if there IS a Squatsville in Kansas, or if they have a dog catcher…but you get my drift.

Naturally, the political party that can’t come to grips with the fact that there are but two genders, seems to now believe that impeaching President Trump would get them Hillary as their President…and as liberals are most certainly Constitutionally challenged…let me clear this up for them.

They’d succeed in only two things…first, they’d get President Mike Pence, who would pick a Republican as HIS Vice President…and they would only manage to eliminate the one thing that beats the liberal media matrix…Trump’s Twitter account, which he uses to bypass said media to deliver his own messages directly to the people.

All of this is in response to liberals having been butt-hurt over Hillary’s loss to President Trump in 2016, which they still, to this day, see as the theft of the White House from their anointed dear socialist leader, so let’s have a quick look at the numbers…

Trump won 304 Electoral College votes to Hillary’s 227. Given that it takes 270 to win the White House…well…there ya go.

Trump won 30 states to Hillary’s 20…and Trump was the winner in 2,623 counties across this nation of ours while Hillary only won in 489 counties.

This is exactly why we have an Electoral College…which I’m reasonable sure the socialists would want to be free if they didn’t want it gone altogether…to prevent only the votes in heavily populated specific regions from controlling our election process.

If we went only with the majority of the popular vote, the U.S. would be a democracy…in other words…run by mob rule…but we’re a Constitutional Republic, which means we protect the rights of the minority.

The fact of the matter is…the Electoral College makes a lot more sense that whatever it is that’s used to determine who gets to play for the national championship in college football, and quite frankly, I’m a bit surprised that liberals didn’t label last Monday’s game racist since it was between two teams from the deep south, and the fans cheered when President Trump walked onto the field before the game to sing the National Anthem…but, I digress…

Let’s get back to the liberal’s 2018 midterm election strategy, shall we?

That, of course, being the impeachment of President Trump.

To impeach a sitting President, one would have to prove that said sitting President is guilty of high crimes or misdemeanors…which liberals are just sure President Trump has done…based on their belief that Trump committed collusion with the Russians leading up to the 2016 election, and that he obstructing justice when he fired James Comey from the FBI.

There are, however, distinct problems with these liberal beliefs.

First, the investigation now being headed up by Robert Mueller has found absolutely no evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians…quite the opposite in fact…as the investigation has brought to light collusion with the Russians on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Second, since most of the liberal belief in collusion between Trump and the Russians is based on a fake dossier that was manufactured for liberal political purposes…the firing of Comey is more than justified, as it was Comey’s FBI, and arguably Comey himself that helped pay for that manufactured dossier…and oh yeah…Hillary chipped in to help pay for it too. And let’s not forget that Comey exonerated Hillary well before that particular investigation was over, and well before the FBI even interviewed Hillary herself.

The deeper Mueller digs, the more liberal sludge is brought to the light of day.

In fact…so far…Mueller has managed, despite his liberal directive…to uncover more than enough direct evidence to have impeached Hillary Clinton had SHE actually won the 2016 election, and not an iota of evidence to impeach President Trump.

This is why liberals, like Sroka, are so anxious to bring impeachment proceeding against President Trump before Mueller finishes his dirty, bias laden investigation. Once that investigation is over, liberal support in congress for a Trump impeachment is going to lower than a snake’s ass in a trench.

Truth be told, Hillary, Bill, Comey and an assortment of supposedly non-biased, yet heavily biased FBI agents, Loretta Lynch and an assortment of DOJ officials from the Obama regime…and possibly Obama himself SHOULD be facing charges right now.

Liberal logic, however, has all the earmarks of basing their 2018 strategy on Impeaching President Trump, which comes as no great surprise to those of us with a super, double top secret liberal decoder ring, as it is the same logic that leads liberals, who claim the sole right to stand for gay rights, to defend…as a “religion of peace” an ideology that premeditates the murder of 50 gay people in Orlando, but draws the line at a baker refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding…because of the baker’s Christian religion.

Impeachment takes a simple majority of the House to vote for it, but a 2/3 majority of the Senate, so even if liberals take both the House AND the Senate in the 2018 midterms, which, based on the economic and foreign policy wins being racked up by Trump over the last year seems highly unlikely, liberals won’t have anywhere near the 2/3 of the Senate they would need to turn Vice President Pence, into President Pence.

But here again, liberal logic buries its head even deeper in its own keester. We’re talking about the same liberal logic that lead Billy Boy Clinton to question what the meaning of “is” is. Here’s what Neil Sroka had to say regarding the 2/3 of the Senate needed for impeachment…

“We’ll see what two-thirds looks like.”

Liberal common core math aside…2/3 of the senate equates to 67 votes…and of the 34 Senate seats up for election in the 2018 midterm election this coming November…26 are currently held by liberals. That means, again sans common core math…that only 8 are currently Republican seats, and so, even if the liberals manage to take all 8…they STILL won’t have 67 seats…67 votes or the 2/3 they need to impeach President Trump.

This is for liberals only…49 seats, plus 8 seats, equals 57 seats…10 short of what you need for your 2018 midterm strategy to work.

But, if an impeachRelated imagement of President Trump strategy is really what you liberals think is your best bet leading into the November elections, don’t let me stop you.

By all means…PLEASE carry on…but…take my advice…

Order your bottles of bubbles, your Crayons and coloring books, and your therapy puppies now…because come November…trust me…you’re gonna need them.

Copyright © 2018 Craig Andresen / thenationalpatriot.com

As Diane Sori, my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTSpartner is once again in FB jail, and unable to post…I ask that you take the time to read her most recent Op-Ed regarding the uproar of Oprah by CLICKING HERE!!!

http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history 

One thought on “The Craziest Democrat Strategy Yet

Read more…

2016’s Shocking Homelessness Statistics

2016’s Shocking Homelessness Statistics

( If you are a illegal or a Muslims they would not have this problem! Obama and the Socialist  Democratic Party created this problem by destroying the economy with all their regulations and allow us to be invaded by illegals and Muslims who get the hand outs over the AMERICAN PEOPLE this is what you want to elected in 2018 those who put the AMERICAN people last!)

Principles for a FREE SOCIETY 

William Finley   

Later this month, The San Francisco Chronicle will lead an effort to flood the Bay Area with stories and news reports on the city’s homelessness crisis. Working with local television, print, and online news outlets, this coordinated effort will create a wave of coverage about this pressing issue, hopefully forcing the public and area politicians to put some major energy and resources into finding real, lasting solutions.

Are you a homeless services organization? Our free Homeless Services eBook is full of expert advice that comes from years of helping human services organizations.

For many cities, solving homelessness is an ongoing challenge. So, what does homelessness look like in 2016? The following statistics are alarming:

  1. 564,708 people in the U.S. are homeless. According to a recent report, over half a million people were living on the streets, in cars, in homeless shelters, or in subsidized transitional housing during a one-night national survey last January. Of that number, 206,286 were people in families, 358,422 were individuals, and a quarter of the entire group were children.
  2. 83,170 individuals, or 15% of the homeless population, are considered “chronically homeless.” Chronic homelessness is defined as an individual who has a disability and has experienced homelessness for a year or longer, or and individual who has a disability and has experienced at least four episodes of homelessness in the last three years (must be a cumulative of 12 months). Families with at least one adult member who meets that description are also considered chronically homeless.As the National Alliance to End Homelessness explains, “While people experiencing chronic homelessness make up a small number of the overall homeless population, they are among the most vulnerable. They tend to have high rates of behavioral health problems, including severe mental illness and substance use disorders; conditions that may be exacerbated by physical illness, injury, or trauma.”
  1. 47,725, or about 8% of the homeless population, are veterans. This represents a 35% decrease since 2009. Homeless veterans have served in several different conflicts from WWII to the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Washington, D.C., has the highest rate of veteran homelessness in the nation (145.8 homeless veterans per 10,000). 45% of homeless veterans are black or Hispanic. While less than 10% of homeless veterans are women, that number is rising.
  2. 1.4 million veterans are at risk of homelessness. This may be due to poverty, overcrowding in government housing, and lack of support networks. Research indicates that those who served in the late Vietnam and post-Vietnam era are at greatest risk of homelessness. War-related disabilities or disorders often contribute to veteran homelessness, including physical disabilities, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury, depression and anxiety, and addiction.
  3. 550,000 unaccompanied, single youth and young adults under the age of 24 experience a homelessness episode of longer than one week. Approximately 380,000 of that total are under the age of 18. Accurately counting homeless children and youth is particularly difficult. The National Alliance to End Homelessness explains, “Homeless youth are less likely to spend time in the same places as homeless people who are in an older age range. They are often less willing to disclose that they’re experiencing homelessness or may not even identify as homeless. They also may work harder to try to blend in with peers who aren’t homeless.”
  4. 110,000 LGBTQ youth in the U.S. are homeless. This is one of the most vulnerable homeless populations. A substantial number of young people who identify as LGBTQ say that they live in a community that is not accepting of LGBTQ people. In fact, LGBTQ youths make up 20% of runaway kids across the country. Family rejection, abuse, and neglect are major reasons LGBTQ youth end up on the streets. Additionally, homeless LGBTQ youth are substantially more likely than heterosexual homeless youth to be victims of sexual assault and abuse. LGBTQ homeless youth are twice as likely to commit suicide compared to heterosexual homeless youth.
  5. Fifty percent of the homeless population is over the age of 50. These individuals often face additional health and safety risks associated with age. They are more prone to injuries from falls, and may suffer from cognitive impairment, vision or hearing loss, major depression, and chronic conditions like diabetes and arthritis.
  6. 830,120 year-round beds are available in a range of housing projects. About half of those beds are dedicated to people currently experiencing homelessness. This includes
    • Emergency Shelters that provide temporary or nightly shelter beds to people experiencing homelessness.
    • Transitional Housing that provides homeless people with up to 24 months of housing and supportive services.
    • Safe Havens that provide temporary shelter and services to hard-to-serve individuals.

The other half of these beds are targeted at recently homeless populations. Rapid Rehousing provides short-term and medium-term rental assistance, housing relocation, and stabilization services to formerly homeless people experiencing homelessness. Permanent Supportive Housing provides long-term housing with supportive services for formerly homeless people with disabilities. Other Permanent Housing provides housing with or without services, but does not require people to have a disability.

As shocking as these statistics are, there are so many great organizations working tirelessly to end homelessness in the U.S. and around the world. Get inspired by their work and success, continue reading some of the Social Solutions case studies that feature clients who work with the homeless population!

Read more…

E NAKED ISLAM

It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you

IS THE FRENCH PRESIDENT starting to sound like Trump?

Read more…