William M. Finley's Posts (2815)

Sort by
Ad
Sunday, December 10, 2017

Trump Lauds Rejection of U.N. Plan to Force Mass Third World Immigration and Silence Free Speech

33
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

Not only did Obama sign on to this abdication of our national sovereignty, but it included sharia restrictions on our First Amendment freedoms. “Demonizing refugees or migrants offends profoundly against the values of dignity and equality for every human being … We will take a range of steps to counter such attitudes and behavior, in particular with regard to hate crimes, hate speech and racial violence.”

The media never tells you that when Obama signed away our right to control who immigrates into our country, he signed away our free speech rights. Evil.

Trump Touts Rejection of U.N. Plan to Force Mass Third World Immigration

At his speech in Pensacola, Florida Friday, President Donald Trump celebrated his decision to take America out of negotiations for the so-called “Global Compact on Migration.”

“I recently withdrew the United States from the United Nations plan for global governance of immigration and refugee policy,” Trump told the raucous crowd, calling the Global Compact a “no borders plan.”

“I heard about this recently … no borders, everyone can come in! If you don’t mind, I rejected that plan, is that OK?” Trump continued.

The plan Trump referenced was the United Nations’ (U.N.) “Global Compact on Migration,” to which the Obama administration pledged the United States participation last year. Talks began this week in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, on the massive United Nations (U.N.) plan to create “safe, regular and orderly migration,” from the third whole to wealthy countries in Europe and North America. On the eve of those talks, however, Trump reversed Obama’s decision and pulled U.S. negotiators.

“I told them, not only do we not want ‘no borders,’ we want the strongest borders you’ve ever seen,” Trump boasted. “America is a sovereign country. We set our immigration rules. We don’t listen to foreign bureaucrats.”

The details of the of the Global Compact are yet to be hammered out, but the outline to which the Obama administration signed on, called the “New York Declaration for Refugee and Migrants,” presents a nightmare scenario for immigration restrictionists and border security advocates.

The declaration stipulates that participating countries should drop laws criminalizing illegal entry and stop detaining illegal immigrants that are caught. Paragraph 33 “reaffirms:”

[T]hat all individuals who have crossed or are seeking to cross international borders are entitled to due process in the assessment of their legal status, entry and stay, we will consider reviewing policies that criminalize crossborder movements. We will also pursue alternatives to detention while these assessments are under way.

And later, the declaration calls for the end of all deportations, “encouraging” that “migrants who do not have permission to stay in the country of destination” leave “preferably on a voluntary basis.”
Perhaps most disturbingly to a country with as robust a tradition of free speech as the United States, the New York Declaration casts resistance to mass migration as racism, xenophobia, and illegal under international law. Paragraph 13 reads:
We recall that our obligations under international law prohibit discrimination of any kind on the basis of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Yet in many parts of the world we are witnessing, with great concern, increasingly xenophobic and racist responses to refugees and migrants.
Paragraph 14 then calls for so called “hate speech” laws to be mandatory:
Demonizing refugees or migrants offends profoundly against the values of dignity and equality for every human being … We will take a range of steps to counter such attitudes and behavior, in particular with regard to hate crimes, hate speech and racial violence.
In contrast, Trump offered an unapologetic populist-nationalist vision of national sovereignty and local governance. “America is more than a place on a map, it’s a nation, it’s a family,” he told the crowd. “Our agenda is pro-family, pro-police, pro-workers and 100% pro-American.”
Read more…

News

What Trump Is About To Hand Over To The FBI And DOJ Has Officials Panicking

For the past eight years, everywhere you’d turn, you could’ve seen  corrupted agents. It seemed like Obama got our backs for whatever we did. Ignore the Congressional investigations, ignore proves or evidence?

No problem, Obama would still support you. But behind his protection of the citizens he was actually protecting himself.
Trump and Sessions are different story.

They don’t close their eyes in front of corruption. Best example is the White House reaction when the FBI failed to charged Hillary for the crimes that she did. Maybe everyone else forgot about this, but Trump didn’t.

Although Hillary and the trouble that she carries is past, there are still some things that need to be fixed. We can start with cleaning the FBI from corrupted agents.

Even though the FBI is trying to protect their own spies, the White House and Congress are doing everything in their power to stop this.

As we are learning, the Congress is preparing the documents that will finally bring justice.

Breitbart reports:

“The House intelligence committee will begin writing a resolution Tuesday to cite top FBI and Justice Department officials in contempt of Congress after they missed a Monday deadline to turn over documents the committee.

The tipping point came after information the committee had been seeking for months was leaked to the New York Times and the Washington Post during the weekend.”

“Those stories revealed that top FBI agent Peter Strzok was removed from the special counsel’s Russia probe after he exchanged critical text messages about President Trump with another FBI agent with whom he was having an extramarital affair.

The committee asked months ago why the FBI removed Strzok but were never told the reason.”

Long story short, the FBI found a “rat” between them who was investigating Trump and Russia, and they fired him ASAP. They did what they did for two possible reasons. They ether didn’t want to make it look like they are against our President or they got scared that this will uncover their hidden acts (!?)

When the Congress asked the Bureau why did they fired Strzok, they raised shoulders and didn’t answer. But then, when the New York Times and the Post asked the same question, the FBI told the full story.

Why do you think they did that? Guessing that the Congress’s decision makes them sweat.

Featured Image Source H/T: Breitbart

Read more…
Did you know we can hide ads for you?
at-painter.gif

American Thinker

Memo to John Lewis: Democrats are the party of white racism

Georgia Democrat Rep. John Lewis refused to attend the opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum because President Trump was there, yet he would have been the first to condemn Trump had Trump not gone.  The irony is that much of the brutality, oppression, and denial of civil rights the museum records was committed by the party of white racism – the Democratic Party.

Reps. John Lewis and Bennie G. Thompson issued a joint statement full of righteous indignation but little truth in explaining their absence from the ceremony:

President Trump's attendance and his hurtful policies are an insult to the people portrayed in this civil rights museum. The struggles represented in this museum exemplify the truth of what really happened in Mississippi.

What really happened in Mississippi and throughout the South is that Democrats, who never got over losing the Civil War, sought to move blacks to a new plantation of oppression and suppression.  As one wag put it, the reason Democrats hate Republicans so much is that the Republicans took away their slaves.  All the Democrats have succeeded in doing is moving blacks to the urban plantations of inner cities like Baltimore, Detroit, and Chicago, all run by Democrats, where black children are preyed upon by black gangs, are trapped in failing schools, and have little or no job opportunities.

It is hard to fathom what Rep. Lewis means by "hurtful policies."  Does he mean trying to rid the inner cities of gangs like MS-1; supporting school choice; fighting illegal immigration, which increases competition for entry level jobs; or just generally promoting economic growth, the rising tide President John F. Kennedy said lifts all our boats?

One would have thought the eight-year presidency of the first black president, Barack Obama, was an era of progress for blacks, but it decidedly was not:

[T]he seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has slipped from 63.2 percent to 61.7 percent – down 2.4 percent.

The seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black teenagers also sagged from 29.6 percent to 28.8 percent – down 2.7 percent.

During Obama's tenure, the percentage of black Americans struggling below the poverty line has advanced, according to the most recent Census Bureau data, from 25.8 in 2009 to 26.2 in 2014 – up 1.6 percent.

Real median income among black households during those years, according to the Census Bureau, sank from $35,954 to $35,398 – down 1.5 percent.

The number of black food-stamp participants exploded across that time frame from 7,393,000 to 11,699,000, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports – up 58.2 percent.

Also, from Obama's oath of office through the fourth quarter of 2015, the percentage of black Americans who own homes foundered from 46.1 percent to 41.9 percent, according to the Census – down 9.1 percent.

One can search in vain for John Lewis and his liberal brethren saying anything about Barack Obama's "hurtful policies."  Obama, like most liberal Democrats, blames the plight of blacks on racism when in fact the impediments to black progress are to be found in fatherless homes, out-of-wedlock births, gang crime, failing public schools, and cities run by Democratic socialists who blame racism but not their opportunity-killing policies.

John Lewis's historical amnesia omits, for example, the fact that it was not a Republican, but the honored and celebrated Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia and former "Grand Kleagle" with the Ku Klux Klan, who holds the distinction of being the only senator to have opposed the only two black nominees to the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, and led a 52-day filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.

Sen. Al Gore, father of the former vice president, voted against the act, as did Sen. J. William Fulbright, to whom Bill Clinton dedicated a memorial; former South Carolina senator Ernest Hollings; Sen. Richard Russell; and, of course, Sen. Strom Thurmond, who was a Democrat at that time.

John Lewis forgets that it was Democrats who unleashed the dogs and turned on the fire hoses on civil rights marchers.  It was Democrats who stood in the schoolhouse door and are still standing there by opposing school choice and trapping minority children in failing schools.  It was Democrats who blocked the bridge in Selma.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would never have been possible without Republican leadership.  Not only was that legislation a personal victory for Illinois Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen, then Senate minority leader, but Republicans in both the House and Senate supported the measure in far greater percentages than Democrats.  Only six GOP senators voted against the act, compared with 21 Democrats.  The party of Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump beat back the fire hoses and dogs of the party of Robert Byrd and John Lewis.

As one pundit put it, the Democrats should know a lot about Jim Crow laws, since Democrats wrote them.  Condoleezza Rice, President George W. Bush's national security adviser, explained at the 2000 GOP national convention why a black college professor would be a Republican:

The first Republican I knew was my father John Rice. And he is still the Republican I admire the most. My father joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. I want you to know that my father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I.

Neither should we.  Lewis's colleague in the Senate, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) badgered Attorney General Jeff Sessions about the awards he received from various groups whose founders or leaders have made politically incorrect statements Blumenthal found offensive.  Neither Blumenthal nor Lewis has any problem with Hillary Clinton, their 2016 presidential candidate, accepting the Margaret Sanger Award.

Back in March of 2009, Hillary Clinton accepted Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger Award, doled out by an organization originally called the American Birth Control League.  In accepting the award, the Weekly Standard noted, Hillary had high praise for the noted eugenicist:

Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision[.] ... And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.

As J. Kenneth Blackwell, writing in the Washington Times, notes, those who chant "black lives matter" obviously exclude the abortion rate of black babies that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger and the KKK could only dream of:

138,539 black babies, nearly one baby in three, were killed in the womb in 2010. According to the CDC, between 2007 and 2010, innocent black babies were victimized in nearly 36 percent of the abortion deaths in the United States, though blacks represent only 12.8 percent of the population. Some say the abortion capital of America is New York City. According to LifeSiteNews, the city's Department of Health reported that in 2012, more black babies were aborted (31,328) than born (24,758). That's 55.9 percent of black babies killed before birth. Blacks represented 42.4 percent of all abortions.

This is a disturbing and tragic situation that continues unabated and is the fulfillment of the dream of Hillary Clinton's heroine, Margaret Sanger.  As Blackwell also noted:

According to Sanger, "Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated." She opened her first abortion clinics in inner cities, and it's no accident that even today, "79 percent of Planned Parenthood's abortion facilities are located in black or minority neighborhoods."

Rep. Chris Smith reminded Hillary Clinton of the nature of Sanger's belief that eugenics, something the Nazis would put into horrifying practice, was Margaret Sanger's solution to all our problems, particularly racial ones.  As LifeSite News reported at the time:

Addressing Mrs. Clinton, Smith said, "Are you kidding? In 'awe'' of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, 'Eugenics … is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems'. And who also said in 1922, 'The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it'?" ...

Highlighting the racist nature of eugenics, Smith further quoted Sanger, who said in 1939,  "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities[.] ... We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."

When Jeff Sessions was being crucified for his alleged racist past, Sen Ted. Cruz pointed out that Democrats had better look in the mirror of history:

The day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was rebuked while making a speech critical of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Sen. Ted Cruz blasted Democrats, saying their party is the one rooted in racism.

"The Democrats are the party of the Ku Klux Klan," Cruz (R-Tex.) said in an interview on Fox News on Wednesday. "You look at the most racist – you look at the Dixiecrats, they were Democrats who imposed segregation, imposed Jim Crow laws, who founded the Klan. The Klan was founded by a great many Democrats."

Cruz is right.  John Lewis is wrong.  Under President Trump, black Americans are finding work in greater numbers and are increasingly participating in an economy freed from oppressive taxation and regulation:

The unemployment rate, labor participation rate and overall employment for black Americans appears to be improving under President Donald Trump, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data[.] ...

In the president's first 7 months in office, the unemployment rate for said group dropped from 8.0 in March 2017 to 7.4 in July.

The participation rate for black American workers is up one percent since March 2017, and the number of black Americans with a job is up roughly 700,000.

Black Americans were one of the hardest hit groups during the Great Recession and throughout much of former President Barack Obama's two-terms in office. The unemployment rate for this group was 13.7 when Obama took office in 2009, reaching a height of 16.8 in March 2010.

As libertarian commentator, investigative reporter, and host on TheBlaze TV Lawrence Jones notes:

Black unemployment is at a 20-year low. Under President Obama, it was double the national average. Black businesses are soaring right now. Food stamps for black folks are decreasing.

John Lewis doesn't remember the thrilling days of yesteryear, when Democrats stood in the schoolhouse door, wrote Jim Crow laws, and unleashed the dogs, or even the era of Barack Obama, when blacks were a source of votes, treated as victims, while trapped in urban plantations run by Democrats.

Trump asked blacks during the campaign, What do you have to lose?  The answer so far is that they have lost nothing and have gained and will gain much as they are freed to participate in and pursue the American dream.

Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor's Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.

Read more…

Immigrant Youth to Congress: You Have Two Weeks to Pass the Dream Act

This Congress has failed to do their job on every level!!! Nov. 8th 2018 is the day reckoning VOTE!!!!!! 

Our lives hang in the balance—that’s the message immigrant youth are delivering to Congress right now.

If Congress doesn’t pass the Dream Act in the next two weeks, about 14,000 more young immigrants will lose their protections from deportation; already, 122 young immigrants are losing those protections every day, and millions remain vulnerable. If Congress doesn’t pass the Dream Act, its members are choosing to deport my little brother Jonathan.

President Donald Trump created this crisis by killing the Deferred Action for Immigrant Arrivals (DACA) program back in September, and now, with thousands in danger, members of Congress must protect them by passing a clean Dream Act, a bill free of anti-immigrant provisions that harm parents of immigrant youth and the immigrant community at large.

There is no other way forward.

Through relentless organizing, immigrant youth won the DACA program during the Obama administration. Over the past five years, it helped nearly 800,000 immigrants go to school, work and achieve a greater sense of public recognition as Americans who should not have to live in constant fear of being detained and deported.

Now their futures are in jeopardy.

The Dream Act has strong bipartisan support, is favored by over 85 percent of Americans and has the backing of CEOs, faith leaders and educators. The legislation would create a pathway to citizenship for millions of immigrant youth who call this country home, and protect them from deportation—without putting their parents and communities in jeopardy.

www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-lg/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG"> www.newsweek.com/files/styles/full/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG 1x" media="(min-width: 1200px)" />www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-lg/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG 1x" media="(min-width: 992px)" />www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-tablet/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG 1x" media="(min-width: 768px)" />www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-tablet/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG 1x" media="(min-width: 481px)" />www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-sm/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG 1x" media="(min-width: 0px)" />%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=www.newsweek.com/files/styles/embed-lg/public/2017/12/08/cristinajimenez1.PNG" alt="CristinaJimenez1" title="" width="635" height="394" /> Cristina Jiménez is executive director of United We Dream, the largest immigrant youth-led organization in the United States. She is a 2017 MacArthur Fellow. Cristina Jiménez

More than 30 Republican members of Congress have publicly called for immigrant youth to be protected before the end of the year, and Democrats have been vocal about the need for action. The Dream Act can and must be included in the year-end budget negotiations, and it is time for members of Congress from both parties to insist on making that happen.

Congress has two weeks to protect immigrant youth, and if they do not, the pain and horror of our experience will be on their hands.

Just weeks ago, a 10-year-old named Rosa Maria Hernández was followed to the hospital by deportation agents, who dragged her to a detention camp after surgery. She would be protected under the Dream Act but instead she and millions like her are vulnerable. The stakes could not be higher.

Most Americans support the Dream Act because it speaks to something fundamental: We all have dreams for ourselves and our families, and we should be able to pursue them free of fear or harm. This is our home after all, and we are here to stay.

That’s why, in so many towns, cities and states, people of conscience from diverse backgrounds have been taking to the streets to demand a clean Dream Act with no additional border enforcement measures, so that immigrant families can stay together and not endure the pain of unjust separation.

Delay on the Dream Act means deportations, and we know that when leaders like Majority Leader Mitch McConnell or House Speaker Paul Ryan tell us to wait until next year, they are telling us that they would rather see immigrant youth deported than stand up for what is right.

Immigrant youth are demanding action now to accelerate justice; there is no time to spare. Every minute matters, and many of us are truly fighting for our lives.

Republican leaders must end their blockade of the Dream Act and get behind this common-sense solution.  And Democratic leaders must use their leverage in budget negotiations to force the issue. This is not a moment for casual support; this is a moment for leadership from every member of Congress.

If Congress does not pass a clean Dream Act this month, there will be massive political consequences for the politicians and parties who kill it. The far-reaching movement for the protection of immigrant youth and communities has enormous political power, infrastructure and a national organizing network that can influence elections at all levels.

Increasingly, we are seen and heard as the new American majority fighting for a better country, and for the bedrock values of freedom, dignity and the pursuit of happiness. We are here to stay. We’ve turned that idea into a national rallying cry in the era of Trump.

And, now, we’re asking the leaders of Congress, point blank: Are you going to take action to protect immigrant youth or will you take action to deport them?

If legislators pass the Dream Act, they will join a tradition of leaders who have fought to protect and help fulfill the dreams of immigrants, women, people of color, LGBTQ Americans and others.

If legislators choose to deport immigrant youth, they will become part of a tradition of leaders who have opposed protections and rights for immigrants, women, people of color, LGBTQ Americans and others.

Either way, we will soon learn where Congress stands.

Cristina Jiménez is Executive Director of United We Dream, the largest immigrant youth-led organization in the United States. She is a 2017 MacArthur Fellow. 

Read more…

by A.M. Kinross:

The media is going after politicians today in the same way that we did in the “not so glamorous” days of Bill Clinton. We’ve all heard in great “nationally embarrassing” detail what Bill Clinton enjoyed doing with his cigars during business hours in the Oval Office… and it wasn’t smoking them! Was he impeached? Nope. Was he punished in any way? Uh no. So for our current day headlines to say “It’s time to Impeach Trump – Stand with Tom Steyer” know this, if Bill Clinton can stick a cigar into an interns privates in the oval office and not get impeached, I can assure you there is nothing that Donald Trump has done within his first year of serving our country as President that will get him impeached. History has already proven how much our politicians can get away with, and still hang on to their glorious titles, but even still, President Trump has not been out of line with his actions. No matter, because extreme headlines and petitions are still streaming thru the media as if there is some valid reason to impeach at all! The notion to impeach a man who is standing up to someone as violent and evil as Kim Jong-un is insane. The majority voted for a president with a backbone; the majority elected a president who isn’t afraid of someone as horrible as the leader of North Korea, and the majority elected President Trump to stand up for our country and to make it a better place than what it has been. So, if Bill Clinton can do all the things that he did in the oval office and not be impeached, don’t believe for a moment that signing some petition (because you don’t like having a president with a pair leading our country) will remove him. Those signing a petition paid for by Tom Steyer are delusional sore losers fighting like Extreme Liberals without a Cause.

FREE TRUMP 2020 HATS

It’s time we put an end to all this political hype and extremism. It’s damaging and negative effects do not resolve anything. It does just the opposite. Studies have proven that negativity and fear have far more dramatic effects on our psyche than any other type of news. While it’s a known fact that the masses would prefer to only hear facts, and would prefer to be happy and live without fear, we as a society have been knocked around by extreme politics and name calling.

Like a freight train about to derail, extreme politics have been streaming on both ends of the political spectrum, causing chaos to erupt in our media. It isn’t just an opinion of a liberal to say that Republicans generally have a history of being racist, among other not so desirable titles, such as communistic, Nazi-like, and heartless for choosing big business and money over environmental issues, and humanity abroad. They’ve also been called “War Happy”. In turn, Democrats have a history of being violent rioters, and anti-cop extremist, all abortion – all the time, obsessed over illegal immigration, and having complete disregard for the threat of terrorism.

While all of these labels are being thrown out there to tear down opposing parties, it’s the way in which it’s being presented that is incredibly damaging, and is absolutely hindering any possibility of uniting our country politically. It’s also not fair to label all Republicans or all Democrats with these “extreme” titles, because honestly the mass majority of our society do not possess these demeaning qualities at all. Just the radical Democrats and Republicans who make headline news, or write radical news stories. But these negative affects don’t just affect the extremists, they also have a very powerful effect on everyday Americans. It’s impossible to avoid the “tabloid like” headlines in social media, and even on our evening television, but we have to keep in mind that most Republicans and Democrats really aren’t filled with so much hatred towards each other, and really aren’t filled with these ideas that is being projected as fact in the news. The truth is these headlines are no more normal than watching a Jerry Springer episode and thinking that everyone in today’s society outside of that studio behave that recklessly and trashy. While we aren’t really a Jerry Springer society yet, the possibility of us actually becoming that is very real if we continue to allow social media to behave the way they do, and don’t start holding our nightly news to a higher standard of reporting. How do we accomplish this? There are many ways. We can write the networks and demand to remove “Ratings focused headlines” from the news. We want the facts, not the spin! We can also block fake news sites from our news feed. By doing this the administrators of these sites will be notified that we are blocking them, and giving them a reason as to why. We are their audience. If we don’t stand up and speak out that it’s time to raise the bar, nobody else will. I don’t want this low media standard for our children. They deserve better too.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/06/trump-impeachment-vote-fail-282888
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/02/opinion/lariscy-negative-ads/index.html

Read more…

by A.M. Kinross:

The media is going after politicians today in the same way that we did in the “not so glamorous” days of Bill Clinton. We’ve all heard in great “nationally embarrassing” detail what Bill Clinton enjoyed doing with his cigars during business hours in the Oval Office… and it wasn’t smoking them! Was he impeached? Nope. Was he punished in any way? Uh no. So for our current day headlines to say “It’s time to Impeach Trump – Stand with Tom Steyer” know this, if Bill Clinton can stick a cigar into an interns privates in the oval office and not get impeached, I can assure you there is nothing that Donald Trump has done within his first year of serving our country as President that will get him impeached. History has already proven how much our politicians can get away with, and still hang on to their glorious titles, but even still, President Trump has not been out of line with his actions. No matter, because extreme headlines and petitions are still streaming thru the media as if there is some valid reason to impeach at all! The notion to impeach a man who is standing up to someone as violent and evil as Kim Jong-un is insane. The majority voted for a president with a backbone; the majority elected a president who isn’t afraid of someone as horrible as the leader of North Korea, and the majority elected President Trump to stand up for our country and to make it a better place than what it has been. So, if Bill Clinton can do all the things that he did in the oval office and not be impeached, don’t believe for a moment that signing some petition (because you don’t like having a president with a pair leading our country) will remove him. Those signing a petition paid for by Tom Steyer are delusional sore losers fighting like Extreme Liberals without a Cause.

FREE TRUMP 2020 HATS

It’s time we put an end to all this political hype and extremism. It’s damaging and negative effects do not resolve anything. It does just the opposite. Studies have proven that negativity and fear have far more dramatic effects on our psyche than any other type of news. While it’s a known fact that the masses would prefer to only hear facts, and would prefer to be happy and live without fear, we as a society have been knocked around by extreme politics and name calling.

Like a freight train about to derail, extreme politics have been streaming on both ends of the political spectrum, causing chaos to erupt in our media. It isn’t just an opinion of a liberal to say that Republicans generally have a history of being racist, among other not so desirable titles, such as communistic, Nazi-like, and heartless for choosing big business and money over environmental issues, and humanity abroad. They’ve also been called “War Happy”. In turn, Democrats have a history of being violent rioters, and anti-cop extremist, all abortion – all the time, obsessed over illegal immigration, and having complete disregard for the threat of terrorism.

While all of these labels are being thrown out there to tear down opposing parties, it’s the way in which it’s being presented that is incredibly damaging, and is absolutely hindering any possibility of uniting our country politically. It’s also not fair to label all Republicans or all Democrats with these “extreme” titles, because honestly the mass majority of our society do not possess these demeaning qualities at all. Just the radical Democrats and Republicans who make headline news, or write radical news stories. But these negative affects don’t just affect the extremists, they also have a very powerful effect on everyday Americans. It’s impossible to avoid the “tabloid like” headlines in social media, and even on our evening television, but we have to keep in mind that most Republicans and Democrats really aren’t filled with so much hatred towards each other, and really aren’t filled with these ideas that is being projected as fact in the news. The truth is these headlines are no more normal than watching a Jerry Springer episode and thinking that everyone in today’s society outside of that studio behave that recklessly and trashy. While we aren’t really a Jerry Springer society yet, the possibility of us actually becoming that is very real if we continue to allow social media to behave the way they do, and don’t start holding our nightly news to a higher standard of reporting. How do we accomplish this? There are many ways. We can write the networks and demand to remove “Ratings focused headlines” from the news. We want the facts, not the spin! We can also block fake news sites from our news feed. By doing this the administrators of these sites will be notified that we are blocking them, and giving them a reason as to why. We are their audience. If we don’t stand up and speak out that it’s time to raise the bar, nobody else will. I don’t want this low media standard for our children. They deserve better too.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/06/trump-impeachment-vote-fail-282888
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/02/opinion/lariscy-negative-ads/index.html

Read more…
America

More Democrats Vote for Trump Than Against Him in Impeachment Vote

0
Read more…

by Kathy Crest:

Elizabeth Warren may have some explaining to do to American taxpayers. It seems that those who speak out the loudest against President Trump are those with the most to hide, and “Pocahontas” may be no exception to that rule.

Warren, the Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, was the “brainchild” behind the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an organization formed during the Obama administration after the collapse of the real estate and financial markets. The vague website of the CFPB claims that the organization helps consumers act against companies who operate illegally, and claims to “listen to consumers and make their voices heard”. According to Wikipedia, CFPB jurisdiction includes banks, credit unions, securities firms, payday lenders, mortgage-servicing operations, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors and other financial companies operating in the United States.

CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR FREE HAT

The CFPB was established as an independent agency and was authorized by the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Many Republicans fought the agency, claiming it was given too much power over the financial industry. House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) has been the CFPB’s most relentless critic. “The CFPB undoubtedly remains the single most powerful and least accountable federal agency in all of Washington.”

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) even tried introducing a measure to abolish the CFPB outright. He called it “a runaway agency” that “does little to protect consumers.” Abolishing the CFPB, Cruz said, would give Congress “the opportunity to free consumers and small businesses from the CFPB’s regulatory blockades and financial activism, which stunt economic growth.”

In 2016, a Washington D.C. circuit court judge agreed with Republicans’ concerns over the agency, ruling that it held too much power with very little oversight. The judge found the agency unconstitutional and ruled, “The Director enjoys significantly more unilateral power than any single member of any other independent agency. By “unilateral power,” we mean power that is not checked by the President or by other colleagues. Indeed, other than the President, the Director of the CFPB is the single most powerful official in the entire United States Government, at least when measured in terms of unilateral power. The court went on to proclaim that the director of the CFPB is given more power and autonomy than the speaker of the house, senate majority leader, or even a Supreme Court justice.

Give the Gift of TRUMP

The CFPB was created under the guise that it would reform the financial sector and protect the public from predatory and dangerous practices. But according to the New York Post, there were some “shady things” going on within the organization. In November of this year, the head of the CFPB, Richard Cordray, decided to step down from his position and tried to replace himself with another Democrat, instead of allowing President Trump to appoint his successor. The courts would decide that Trump was in the right, and he appointed Mick Mulvaney to head the bureau until a permanent head could be nominated. This move infuriated Elizabeth Warren, as she knew she would no longer have control over the agency, and her real intentions might be exposed.

According to the New York Post: CFPB is a Democrat shop with an anti-business agenda that goes well beyond protecting consumers and includes closing the “wealth gap” and administering “economic justice”. It hires almost exclusively Democrats and “rejects Republican job applicants,” according to former CFPB enforcement attorney Ronald Rubin. Federal election data show 100 percent of political donations made by CFPB employees during the 2016 election were given to Democratic candidates.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER

The Post also suggested: Bounced business owners and industry reps from secret meetings it’s held with Democrat operatives, radical civil-rights activists, trial lawyers and other “community advisers,” according to a report by the House Financial Services Committee.

Retained GMMB, the liberal advocacy group that created ads for the Obama and Hillary Clinton presidential campaigns, for more than $40 million, making the Democrat shop the sole recipient of CFPB’s advertising expenditure, Rubin says.

Met behind closed doors to craft financial regulatory policy with notorious bank shakedown groups who have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grant money to gin up housing and lending discrimination complaints, which in turn are fed back to CFPB, according to Investor’s Business Daily and Judicial Watch.

And it gets worse: The CFPB, according to the Post, funneled a large portion of the more than $5 billion in penalties collected from defendants to community organizers aligned with Democrats — “a slush fund by another name,” said a consultant who worked with CFPB on its Civil Penalty Fund and requested anonymity.

So if true, the CFPB was basically extorting money in the form of penalties from one group and sending the money to left wing groups, which is basically a slush fund according to a former CFPB employee and whistle blower. No wonder Elizabeth Warren has been so outspoken against President Trump. The Democrats never thought they would be faced with any accountability, because they never thought they would lose the election.

 

Read more…

US Engulfed in the Most Corrupt Event in History and All Roads Lead Back to Former President Obama

Guest post by Joe Hoft

While the mainstream media (MSM) focuses on the fake news Trump-Russia collusion farce, the US is engulfed in the most corrupt event in its history and all roads lead back to former President Obama.

As a matter of fact, the fake Trump investigation is a major piece in the attempted coup d’état currently in place and the MSM’s fake news reporting is part of the Coup.

Just this past week former UN Ambassador John Bolten stated that this is the “First Attempted Coup D’état in US History” –

Bolton is right.  This is the biggest challenge to the survival of the country since the Civil War. 

Democrats in the 1860’s would rather break up the Union than accept the election of the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln. 

Today’s Democrats would rather remove another Republican President, Donald Trump, from office than accept the results of the 2016 election. 

Democrats in the 1860’s broke up the Union because they didn’t want to give up their power over the executive branch of government and they didn’t want to end slavery, Democrats today are partaking in their Coup D’état because they don’t want to give up their power over the federal government and don’t want to be put in jail for their crimes committed in the years before the election.

The Obama Administration and the deep state, those individuals in government that have created crimes and continue to commit crimes to support their cause, don’t want President Trump to change the destructive direction in the US.  The Obama Administration did all it could to destroy this great nation and hand it over to the world of global elites.  President Trump and the Americans that voted for him want to save America and the world by standing for freedom, life, human rights and the pursuit of happiness for all Americans.  The US is at a crossing point.

This started long before the 2016 election.  The Obama Administration was the most corrupt group of villains in the White House ever.  They were involved in numerous crimes and corrupt dealings and efforts to destroy America including covering up their decision not to save four Americans in Benghazi, lying about Obamacare, doubling the US Debt with nothing to show for it, trading the Taliban 5 for a traitor, creating ISIS, giving 20 percent of US uranium to Russia (Uranium One), etc.  The list goes on and on.

Then during the 2016 election the Obama Administration took a fake dossier to the FISA court and used it as a means to spy on their political opponent during the election.  We now know that the dossier was as fake as a National Enquirer article created by a company known to create nasty, made up accusations against individuals for a significant payout.  This dossier was then taken by the FBI to the FISA Court to obtain approval to spy on candidate and now President Trump.

Representative Jim Jordan has many questions that the deep state refuse to answer related to the fake dossier and its use with the FISA Court –

We know that every request to the FISA Court during Obama’s last four years to spy on Americans was signed by former Attorney General Lynch.  We also know that Obama’s dishonest spy Chief James Clapper said he knew of every FISA request that was requested and also that no FISA warrants could have been issued without President Obama knowing.  We also know that  only 1 in 10,000 FISA requests were turned down by the court and this was the first request made by the Obama Administration to spy on Trump.  Obama then apparently used the fake dossier to obtain the warrant on Trump.  We also know that the entire FISA court was Obama appointees in May of 2016, about the time the court the approved Obama’s request to spy on Trump.

We also know that in March President Trump found out and tweeted –

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!

He also tweeted-

Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!

The MSM criticized President Trump for these tweets but now we know he was right.  Towards the end of the election Democrats started their propaganda campaign that Trump was in cahoots with Russia.  Most Americans knew it was nonsense because they voted for Trump.  We don’t know if this was created to protect the Democrats from being caught spying on Trump using known bogus claims, to change the narrative away from their crimes with Russia (Uranium One) or to set Trump up for kangaroo charges after a projected Hillary win.  Regardless, as soon as the election was over, Obama’s deep state went into action.

Deep State got their man at Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, and immediately neutered him.  They next got deep state operative and corrupt Assistant AG who immediately created a special counsel to look into fake Trump-Russia collusion.  The investigation was not based on US law and the man appointed to lead the investigation was none other than Robert Mueller.

We reported in August this year that Mueller is a dirty rotten cop.  He was strategically placed in the position of Special Counsel to investigate the Trump-Russia fake news story by his former partner in crime Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.  He brought in a team of individuals that are all partisan hacks that worked for the corrupt Clintons and Obama administration.

Mueller is also close friends and partner in crime with the man who replaced him a the FBI, James Comey.  In spite of this relationship, and Comey’s obvious involvement in the case, Mueller will not recuse himself from the Trump investigation.  The entire investigation is not even based on US law and the Mueller team continues to break the law by leaking information to the press related to this fake investigation.  It’s even plausible that the entire investigation is in place to allow Mueller and his team the ability to destroy information related to their past criminal actions.

Now however the deep state’s initiative to take over the country is beginning to fail.  They like so many corrupt entities before them went for too much.  Thanks to entities like Judicial Watch that are uncovering documents that show the corrupt and criminal actions of deep state and due to diligent reporting from entities like this one (TGP) and Hannity, Breitbart, FOX Business and others, and the efforts of a few honest congressmen, the deep state is being shown for what it isNumerous corrupt and criminal actions are being reported daily, not by the MSM, but by the new media.  We are growing in numbers and respect as the days go by while the fake news Trump-Russia collusion reporting MSM is being abandoned by truth seeking Americans.

President Trump is doing all he can to move ahead with measures that end the Obama Administration’s destruction of America.  The President also is well aware of the deep state and reassured Americans that the corrupt leaders of the FBI, DOJ and deep state will be addressed –

After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters – worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.

Former Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, shared on Hannity that America is at a crossroads –

This is a real fight for whether America is going to remain a republic or that is ruled by law or whether its going to degenerate into being a purely corrupt system of power where if you’re on the right team you can rip everybody off and be protected or if you’re on the wrong team you can be innocent and go to jail.”

Americans are now becoming more aware that the corrupt deep state has burrowed into the federal government in a manner never seen before.

But the deep state will ultimately be destroyed because of one major thing they underestimated.  The deep state never counted on the massive silent majority of Americans who have not and will not ever give up on Trump or America!

Read more…

Shocker: Rosenstein Satisfied With Mueller Witch Hunt (Guest Post)

By Daniel John Sobieski 4 Comments Fri, Dec, 8th, 2017

16
SHARES


 
In an interview with a local D.C. TV station, Rosenstein admired the monster he created, who now runs an alleged investigation into supposed Russia-Trump collusion but which quickly morphed into what amounts to be a silent coup against a sitting President of the United States:

The U.S. Department of Justice official who appointed special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election said he is satisfied with the special counsel’s work….


“The Office of Special Counsel, as you know, has a degree of autonomy from the Department of Justice. But there is appropriate oversight by the department. That includes budget. But it also includes certain other details of the office. It is part of the Department of Justice. And we’re accountable for it.”

Rosenstein has much to be accountable for. Yes, Virginia, this is a witch hunt. Robert Mueller III was appointed special counsel after his friend, the vindictive former FBI Director James Comey, committed a federal crime by leaking a memo which was a government record to the press. Mueller has picked staff and prosecutors as if he were stocking Hillary Clinton’s Department of Justice. He has picked a bevy of Clinton donors, an attorney who worked for the Clinton Foundation, a former Watergate assistant prosecutor, and even a senior adviser to Eric Holder. Objective professionals all.

Thanks to Rosenstein, Mueller is in fact colluding with Comey and Clinton moles to enact revenge on President Trump for Comey’s firing, something which even Comey said Trump was constitutionally entitled to do. There is no evidence of collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. It is not obstruction of justice for a President to exercise his legal and constitutional authority.

The facts and the lack of an actual crime will not stop Robert Mueller. Just show him the man, or woman, and he will show you the crime. As Professor Alan Dershowitz writes in the Washington Examiner:

Special counsel Robert Mueller was commissioned to investigate not only crime but the entire Russian “matter.” That is an ominous development that endangers the civil liberties of all Americans.

Federal prosecutors generally begin by identifying specific crimes that may have been committed — in this case, violation of federal statutes. But no one has yet identified the specific statute or statutes that constrain Mueller’s investigation of the Russian matter. It is not a violation of any federal law for a campaign to have collaborated with a foreign government to help elect their candidate….

One does not have to go back to the Soviet Union and Lavrentiy Beria’s infamous boast to Stalin, “Show me the man and I will show you the crime,” in order to be concerned about the expansion of elastic criminal statutes. There are enough examples of abuse in our own history.

From McCarthyism to the failed prosecutions of Sen. Ted Stevens, Rep. Thomas DeLay, Gov. Rick Perry and others, we have seen vague criminal statutes stretched in an effort to criminalize political differences.

Indeed, now we here reports that Mueller’s investigation will range anywhere from Jared Kutchner’s finances to perhaps any unpaid parking tickets Sean Spicer may have. To paraphrase the boast of head of Stalin’s secret police , show Mueller the man, and he will find a crime, just as Mueller’s best friend, James Comey, found with Martha Stewart.

Rosenstein is apparently satisfied with what amount to moles from Team Clinton being involved in both the sham collusion investigation and the Comey cover up of Hillary Clinton’s crimes with the head mole being one Peter Strzok. As Byron York reports in the Washington Examiner:

House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued an angry demand to the FBI and Department of Justice to explain why they kept the committee in the dark over the reason Special Counsel Robert Mueller kicked a key supervising FBI agent off the Trump-Russia investigation.

Stories in both the Washington Post and New York Times on Saturday reported that Peter Strzok, who played a key role in the original FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia matter, and then a key role in Mueller’s investigation, and who earlier had played an equally critical role in the FBI’s Hillary Clinton email investigation, was reassigned out of the Mueller office because of anti-Trump texts he exchanged with a top FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair. Strzok was transferred to the FBI’s human resources office — an obvious demotion — in July.

Strzok was everywhere, throwing sand into the wheels of justice at every opportunity to protect Hillary Clinton and her operatives:

Strzok was one of the leaders of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, and he participated in interviews with a number of Clinton’s top aides, including Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, as well as Clinton’s own interview with the FBI.

The longtime FBI investigator also reportedly edited a draft of former FBI Director Jim Comey’s statement on the probe into Clinton’s email use, changing the phrase “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless.”

Strzok was present of the FBI interview of Hillary Clinton, the one where she was not put under oath and for which no notes were taken. She was not put under oath deliberately because Comey had already decided to exonerate her in the memo Strzok altered. Can’t charge her with making false statements to the FBI if those statements are not made under oath, can you? Unlike Lt. Gen. Michal Flynn , Abedin and Mills were given immunity in exchange for nothing, and were not charged with making false statements to the FBI, even though they did:

The Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross reports: “The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state’s private email server.”

More from the report: “Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok.”

Top Mueller deputy Andrew Weissmann was caught wearing his antipathy towards Donald Trump on his sleeve when he penned a love note to then Acting Attorney General Sally Yates when she refused to carry out a lawful order from President Trump to enforce his travel ban:

A top prosecutor working with special counsel Robert Mueller praised former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates at a moment in late January when she was at loggerheads with newly minted president Donald Trump.

Andrew Weissman emailed Yates ten days into the Trump administration after she refused to enforce or defend an executive order banning incoming travelers to the U.S. from seven terror-prone majority Muslim countries.

‘I am so proud. And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects,’ Weissman wrote to her.

Sally Yates was part of the so-called “resistance” to President Trump and his agenda. So too is Peter Strzok. Andrew Weissman, Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein, who is proud of all this.

Now we have word that a top DOJ official, one Bruce G. Orr, who was demoted for activities related to the infamous dossier which may have been used by the FBI to fraudulently obtain FISA warrants to spy on Team Trump and American citizens:

A senior Justice Department official was demoted this week amid an ongoing investigation into his contacts with the opposition research firm responsible for the anti-Trump “dossier,” the department confirmed to Fox News.

Until Wednesday morning, Bruce G. Ohr held two titles at DOJ: associate deputy attorney general, a post that placed him four doors down from his boss, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein; and director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), a program described by the department as “the centerpiece of the attorney general’s drug strategy.”…

Initially senior department officials could not provide the reason for Ohr’s demotion, but Fox News has learned that evidence collected by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., indicates that Ohr met during the 2016 campaign with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the “dossier.”…

Additionally, House investigators have determined that Ohr met shortly after the election with Glenn Simpson, the founder of Fusion GPS – the opposition research firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier with funds supplied by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. By that point, according to published reports, the dossier had been in the hands of the FBI, which exists under the aegis of DOJ, for some five months, and the surveillance on Carter Page, an adviser to the Trump campaign, had started more than two months prior.

Oh what tangled webs Rosenstein and the FBI have weaved. Republican lawmakers, needless to say, are not amused at all this, casting the obvious doubts on Rosenstein’s praise of Special Counsel Mueller:

Several conservative lawmakers held a news conference Wednesday demanding more details of how the FBI proceeded last year in its probes of Hillary Clinton’s use of personal email and Russian election interference. This week, the conservative group Judicial Watch released an internal Justice Department email that, the group said, showed political bias against Trump by one of Mueller’s senior prosecutors….

“The question really is, if Mueller was doing such a great job on investigating the Russian collusion, why could he have not found the conflict of interest within their own agency?’’ Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) asked at the news conference. Meadows, leader of the Freedom Caucus, cited a litany of other issues that he said show bias on the part of the FBI and Mueller, including past political donations by lawyers on Mueller’s team.

A good question Rosenstein won’t answer. Rosenstein is satisfied with Mueller, and why shouldn’t he be? The two go back a long way and cooperated in the cover up of an FBI investigation into Russia’s use of bribes, kickbacks, and money laundering to grab U.S. uranium supplies and real collusion with Hillary Clinton, only to resurface years later to chase phantom collusion between Team Trump and Russia.

Mueller and Rosenstein were both involved in the FBI investigation dating back to 2009, with current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller up to their eyeballs in covering up evidence of Hillry’s collusion, bordering on treason, with Vladimir Putin’s Russia:

Prior to the Obama administration approving the very controversial deal in 2010 giving Russia 20% of America’s Uranium, the FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were involved in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering in order to benefit Vladimir Putin, says a report by The Hill….

John Solomon and Alison Spann of The Hill:Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show….

From today’s report we find out that the investigation was supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, who is now President Trump’s Deputy Attorney General, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director under Trump.

Robert Mueller was head of the FBI from Sept 2001-Sept 2013 until James Comey took over as FBI Director in 2013. They were BOTH involved in this Russian scam being that this case started in 2009 and ended in 2015.

If evidence of bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering in the Uranium One affair are not grounds for a special prosecutor assigned to investigate Hillary Clinton, what is? Rosenstein and Mueller, by their silence on this investigation hidden from Congress and the American people, and using the office of special counsel and a politicized FBI to conduct a silent coup against a duly elected president are unindicted coconspirators in Hillary’s crimes and should be terminated immediately.

Read more…

Minnesota: Muslim Candidates Knee Deep in Voter Fraud Scandal

( Muslims do not assimilate!! THEY INFILTRATE !!!)

A few angles to this story. First, the race pitted two far left Muslim candidates against each other – a stark reminder of just how far down the sharia hole some areas of Minnesota have fallen

Second, the race between Somali Muslims was rife with voter fraud. This is nothing new in races with large constituents of Somali Muslims in the U.S. See links at the end of the article.

via Ward 6 Knee Deep in Voter Fraud Scandal

Dirty Civil War in Minneapolis Progressive Politics

MINNEAPOLIS- City Council candidate Mohamud Noor released a statement calling out voter fraud occurring in the Minneapolis Ward 6 city council election.

Noor

The allegation came right after Noor removed his challenge against Abdi Warsame, who was confirmed to have won the election in a recount.

Warsame

After a preliminary review of the voter data which was provided to us last Friday,” Noor said, “we have found evidence that at least one hundred people appear to have voted in our election who do not live in Ward 6.”

The final vote count put Warsame and Noor extremely close in numbers, with Warsame’s victory margin being only 239 more votes than Noor.

“Because a recount can not address these irregularities, we will bring this evidence to a court to determine what to do with these findings,” Noor’s press release continued, “It is our responsibility to make sure that the integrity of our democracy is protected, and that these irregularities are fully investigated.”

Warsame was quick to respond.

“Today, a recount by the Minneapolis City Election’s Administrator confirmed the results of the 6th Ward City Council race and my margin of victory stands at 240 votes”, Warsame continued, “Mr. Noor now claims to have evidence that at “least one hundred appear” to have voted who do not live in Ward 6. This is a reckless, irresponsible and outrageous claim. To believe Mr. Noor is to believe that the City Elections Administrator is derelict in her duties, that election officials failed in their responsibilities, and that voters in a primarily East African Ward committed fraud and are guilty of felony crimes.”

Warsame snarkily finished, “If Mr. Noor believes people voted illegally, he can bring his “evidence” to County Attorney Michael Freeman and seek felony prosecution. Or perhaps he can bring his claims to Donald Trump’s Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.”

Both Warsame and Noor are progressives with Noor receiving endorsements from Black Lives Matter and Our Revolution Minnesota.  Noor campaigned extensively on the platforms of ‘community policing’ and a $15 minimum wage.

In the last days of the election, Noor accused Warsame of not being progressive enough and used a letter from a list of ‘progressive’ Minnesota representatives, including Raymond Dehn and Ilhan Omar, that implied he was the “only” progressive in the city council election.

“[Warsame] has aligned himself with big business interests and the Minneapolis Police Federation who fund his campaign, over the needs of working families,” the letter condemned Warsame.

Anyone who has been found to have committed election fraud will be convicted of perjury, a felony.


Community policing? That means Muslims policing Muslims. Shariaville anyone?

Earlier this year, a Democratic caucus ended in Chaos and Bloodshed in the Same Somali-dominated Ward where voter fraud has now taken place.

Mohamud Noor’s campaign was accused of voter fraud in a previous electionMinnesota: Somali Voter Fraud Uncovered in Dem Race feat Muslim Candidate

Warsame and Omar are no strangers to legal controversy either. Search the archives.

It’s happening in other states too: Democrats and Somali voter fraud in Ohio.

 

Read more…

Oregon: Hamas-CAIR Demands Portland Sever Ties with Joint Terrorism Task Force

( Muslims do not assimilate!! THEY INFILTRATE !!!)

CAIR flyer advising Muslims not to work with FBI

“There’s a New Call for Portland to Sever Ties With a Federal Terrorism Task Force,” by Dirk VanderHart, Portland Mercury, November 8, 2017:

If civil liberties advocates get their way, Portland’s latest city council might be the third in a row to consider the city’s involvement with federal anti-terror investigations.

In a call that’s become familiar in the last 10 years, a group of organizations including the ACLU of Oregon, Portland Copwatch, the National Lawyers’ Guild, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Oregon, launched a campaign today to convince the city to cease participation in the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force.

The groups raise long-held concerns that the JTTF ropes local cops into surveillance efforts that are secretive and might be problematic. But they’re also using the administration of Donald Trump—specifically, its targeting of Muslim immigrants and other communities—as leverage to try to convince Portland to wash its hands of the matter.

“President Trump has made it clear he plans to target people based on their religion (Muslims), national origin (immigrants), and political beliefs (protesters), not to mention the media and others,” reads a letter signed by 24 organizations and individuals, and submitted to Portland City Council today.

Portland currently dedicates two officers to the JTTF, and has a memorandum of understanding with the federal government sealing the deal. The officers who participate in the taskforce are given security clearance higher than that of Police Chief Danielle Outlaw or Mayor Ted Wheeler, and the activities of the JTTF are closely guarded secrets.

(Former Mayor Charlie Hales applied for secret clearance, but was denied in 2014. Wheeler hasn’t applied his office says, adding “the Mayor receives regular updates during briefings, particularly with regard to drug trafficking and child sex trafficking.”)

The FBI calls its 104 JTTFs “our nation’s front line on terrorism: small cells of highly trained, locally based, passionately committed investigators, analysts, linguists, SWAT experts, and other specialists from dozens of U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.”

But civil liberties groups have long bristled at secret activities they believe might easily cross the line. The latest campaign suggests JTTF involvement could spur local cops to break state laws, including a statute that prevents local law enforcement from surveilling groups not suspected of crimes, anti-profiling legislation, and Oregon’s 30-year-old sanctuary law.

“Because it operates under a veil of secrecy with very little oversight, the true extent of rights violations committed by the JTTF is unclear,” Kimberly McCullough, policy director for the ACLU of Oregon, said in a prepared statement. “This lack of transparency also makes it very difficult to know how and when rights violations involve Portland Police Bureau officers.”

The city has a rollercoaster relationship with the JTTF. In 2005, under the leadership of then-Mayor Tom Potter, the city severed ties with the taskforce, partly amid civil liberties concerns (Commissioner Dan Saltzman was the lone vote against that move).

Then in November 2010, the FBI announced a young Muslim man had tried to blow up Portland’s Christmas tree lighting ceremony (after having his hand held by the FBI throughout the “plot”). Immediately afterward, Saltzman began agitating for Portland to re-join the JTTF, and in April 2011 the city voted to partially reunite with the group.

In 2015, on the heels of terror attacks in cities around the globe, City Council voted to fully re-join the JTTF. It was a 3-2 decision, in which Hales cast the decisive vote (current commissioners Fish and Saltzman joined him in support, current Commissioner Amanda Fritz voted against along with former Commissioner Steve Novick).

Portland’s not the only city that’s had heartburn about the JTTF. Earlier this year, San Francisco police pulled out the their local task force, spurring dire warnings from federal officials in the process.

There’s not yet any indication the current council, which includes a new mayor in Wheeler and a new commissioner, Chloe Eudaly, wants to take up the debate again. The groups launching the latest campaign said today they hadn’t asked current councilmembers about the matter.


Pamela Geller writes via Hamas-CAIR, ACLU Demand that Portland, Oregon Sever Ties with the Joint Terrorism Task Force – Geller Report

So now Muslims plotting to commit jihad terror are not to be touched because it’s islamophobic?

One of Hamas-CAIR’s posters tells Muslims not to talk to the FBI. Now these saboteurs are trying to get the city of Portland, Oregon not to cooperate with the Joint Terrorism Task Force. What will be the result if they succeed? More jihad terrorism. It’s no wonder that the United Arab Emirates has designated the Hamas-tied group CAIR a terrorist group. For years, CAIR has instructed the Muslim community to cover for jihadists. Now it is demanding that non-Muslims not investigate or try to counter terrorist plotting.

If the city of Portland weren’t run by doctrinaire and blinkered leftists, they would send CAIR — and the leftist destroyers of the ACLU — packing, and tell them both never to come back. If Portland had a mayor worth a vote, that mayor would tell these groups that he or she was going to defend the people of Portland, and they weren’t going to stop that defense with their propaganda.

Instead, Portland is likely to give in.

The letter making the demand that Portland not cooperate with the JTTF says: “President Trump has made it clear he plans to target people based on their religion (Muslims), national origin (immigrants), and political beliefs (protesters), not to mention the media and others.”

Jihadis target people because of their religion, national origin and political beliefs all the time. What is Hamas-CAIR doing about that?

Read more…

UC BERKELEY: Which flag is more offensive?

LAM

It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you

Read more…

Muslim Brotherhood declares jihad on “enemy state” US over Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital

“The Muslim Brotherhood recognizes the American president’s move to put America and all its interests in all countries of the world under the same political control of the interests of the Zionist entity, and it will become an enemy state of the Arab world and Islamic components international and institutional, political and popular….The Muslim Brotherhood is launching today a solidarity call with all Palestinian factions and Islamic movements to ignite an uprising throughout the Islamic world against the Zionist occupation and the American administration in support of the occupation and against the rights and freedoms of the peoples. The Muslim Brotherhood stresses that Jerusalem is not [just a] land or symbol. Jerusalem is a confession of faith (`aqīdah) and a religion (dīn)…. Jerusalem is an Islamic and Arab land, for which we will shed our blood, freedom and life, and we fight every aggressor and every supporter of aggression. This is the way of our Jihad.”

What will the Muslim Brotherhood organizations in the U.S. — CAIR, ISNA, MAS, etc. — do? How will they fight this jihad? Certainly in the coming days and weeks they will mount an all-out lobbying and PR campaign to get this move reversed. They always act in sync with the home office.

“Muslim Brotherhood Declares U.S. ‘An Enemy of the Arab World’ After Trump Embassy Announcement,” by Patrick Poole, PJ Media, December 6, 2017 (thanks to the Geller Report):

The Muslim Brotherhood has declared war on the United States after President Trump announced earlier today the official recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and his intent to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

In the published statement on the Ikhwanonline.info website, the group rabidly defended by the CIA and State Department as moderates, declares, “Jerusalem is Islamic and Arab; for it we’ll shed our blood and wage war. This is the way of our Jihad.”

Here’s a translation of the Muslim Brotherhood’s statement:

Muslim Brotherhood: The transfer of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem classifies America as an enemy state and all its interest will be subject to the political position of the interests of the Zionist entity [statement]

In the name of Allah the Merciful

We are for the victory of our messengers, and for those who believe in this life.

Praise be to Allah, and prayers and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah, and those who follow him. The Muslim Brotherhood has followed the U.S. president’s statements about his intention to transfer the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of the State of the Zionist entity, a decision that entered into force is a formal attack by the United States of America on the Islamic lands and holy places.

The Muslim Brotherhood recognizes the American president’s move to put America and all its interests in all countries of the world under the same political control of the interests of the Zionist entity, and it will become an enemy state of the Arab world and Islamic components international and institutional, political and popular.

The American president has exploited the weakness of the Muslim world at present, and the ability of tyrannical regimes to strike deadly blows to the Arab Spring, and decided to support the Zionist lobby, to support the Zionist project on the Palestinian territories, but he should know that his decision presents his state of classification as a state sponsor of the occupation — a country hostile to all freedom in various parts of the world.

The Muslim Brotherhood is launching today a solidarity call with all Palestinian factions and Islamic movements to ignite an uprising throughout the Islamic world against the Zionist occupation and the American administration in support of the occupation and against the rights and freedoms of the peoples.

The Muslim Brotherhood stresses that Jerusalem is not [just a] land or symbol. Jerusalem is a confession of faith (`aqīdah) and a religion (dīn)…. Jerusalem is an Islamic and Arab land, for which we will shed our blood, freedom and life, and we fight every aggressor and every supporter of aggression. This is the way of our Jihad.

Muslim Brotherhood – General Office

Cairo – Wednesday, 17 Rabi’al-Awwal 1439H – December 6, 2017

Read more…

Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a

portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and

attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against

U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.

And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription. Worse still, the reporter actually coaches Nelson, puts words in her mouth, downplay the enormous significance of her deceit.

“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News tells us. “But the message was all Roy Moore.”

“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.

“He did sign it,” she replies.

advertisement

“And you made some notes underneath.”

“Yes,” Nelson says.

And then, after a woman admits to forging a document used in a campaign to destroy the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, ABC News quickly moves on as though it is not news of extraordinary consequence.

Llamas also fails to ask any follow-ups, such as “If the explanation is this simple, why wait all these weeks to offer it?” Or, “Why did you lie?”

Nelson is accusing Moore of attempting to assault her when she was just 16-years-old. With the election just four days away, this admission of forgery could not come at a better time for Moore. Nelson and Allred are planning a news conference Friday, but nothing will overcome the forgery admission.

How can anyone believe anything she says after admitting to such a thing? Early reports are that Nelson and Allred will produce an expert to prove the rest of the yearbook is not a forgery. So a proven forger is bringing in her own expert. What an insult to the people of Alabama.

Another problem with Nelson is that she has a motive to lie and forge: as a circuit judge, Moore ruled against her in a 1999 divorce case.

The Moore campaign has been pressuring Nelson and Allred for weeks to submit the yearbook for independent handwriting analysis. Now everyone knows why that request was rejected and ignored.

With Nelson now thoroughly discredited, this leaves two accusers against Moore.

One is Leigh Corfman, who claims Moore molested her as a 14-year-old child. She is the most credible of the three, but the narrative behind her story, that Moore’s abuse resulted in Corfman’s living a troubled life of “drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt,” is directly contradicted by contemporaneous court records.

Moore’s final accuser is Tina Johnson, a woman who claims Moore groped her butt in his office in 1991. But, again, as was the case with Corfman and Nelson, the left-wing media outlets reporting these allegations (the Washington Post, AL.com) either failed to fully vet the accusers or withheld crucial context.

Thanks to New Media’s going behind these discredited outlets to fact check the reporting, we now know that Johnson did not tell the entire truth. She was not in Moore’s office “on business.” If she was in Moore’s office at all, it was due to a bitter custody battle where Moore represented Johnson’s mother, who was trying to gain custody of Johnson’s 12-year-old son based on the claim that Johnson was an “unfit, absent, and unstable mother.”

If the media and the accusers and Gloria Allred told the full truth to begin with, they would all be more credible.

As far as the accusations against Moore involving his wanting to date teenage girls, those are trumped-up charges, utter nonsense. The age of consent in Alabama was and is 16. Moreover, 40 years ago, it was not at all uncommon in the South for a 32-year-old man to seek a much younger bride. So not only did Moore not break the law, he was not violating any social mores. 

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.

Read more…
Ad

What the Democrats want for us: 400 JIHAD ARRESTS IN 8 MONTHS IN UK

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate!! )

28
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

In opposing President Trump’s sound immigration policies, the alt-left (Democrats) want the same sustained state of terror for Americans.

This is what the Democrats want for every American.

Dreamers? Dreaming of jihad.

Record 400 arrests for terror-related offences were made in the UK in the year to September – including more than 50 women

  • Number of terror arrests up by more than 50% amid increased threat of attack
  • Surge is partly due to series of arrests following four attacks in UK this year
  • Nearly a third of those arrested, 115 suspects, were charged with offences
  • Comes after alleged plot to attack Downing Street and kill PM emerged

Anti-terror police take down a suspect in east London during the London Bridge attack probe. Figures released today show UK police arrested a record 400 terror suspects in the last year

A Home Office statistical bulletin said: ‘As a result, the number of arrests in the year to 30 September 2017 was the highest since the data collection began.’

Just under a third of those arrested, 115 people, were later charged, with the vast majority of those charged with terrorism-related offences.

More than 200 of those arrested were were released without charge, 60 were released on bail pending further investigation and 11 faced so-called ‘alternative action’.

The increase includes a 77% rise in the number of white suspects held, from 81 to 143.

Earlier this week, a report revealed that counter-terror teams are currently running about 500 live investigations involving 3,000 individuals at any one time, while there is also a wider pool of 20,000 subjects of previous probes.

In a briefing given to the Cabinet on Tuesday, the head of MI5 Andrew Parker revealed that total of nine Islamist terrorist plots have been thwarted in the UK over the past year.

21 arrests were made after the London Bridge attack, a month after the Manchester bombing

Two men appeared in court yesterday after security services said they interrupted an alleged plan to blow up the gates to Downing Street and assassinate Prime Minister Theresa May.

Accusations also emerged yesterday, in a separate case, that an alleged extremist encouraged followers to attack Prince George at his primary school. He too faces court action.

An official report earlier this week found that spies missed crucial opportunities to thwart the Manchester terror attack which cost 22 lives.

UK counter-terrorism officials might have prevented suicide bomber Salman Abedi blowing himself up at a pop concert if intelligence had been given greater priority.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd told the Commons that the jihadist atrocity on May 22, which left adults and children dead, could have been avoided ‘had the cards fallen differently’.

Meanwhile, it was also revealed that the ringleader of the Islamist terror gang which brought bloodshed to central London on June 3 was being investigated by MI5 and police for his extremist views.

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Read more…
Ad
Friday, December 08, 2017

Student suspended for debating Islamic extremism in a debate club

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate!)

64
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

Senior Alex Lonsdale, a member of Liberty High’s nationally ranked debate club, says he was just trying to have a friendly debate. He joined a spontaneous conversation among acquaintances about the nature of Islam. Now he’s suspended. Ironically, this was between debate club members.

Incredible. Our children are being forced, punished into submission to Islam in our public schools. More sharia and more submission to the demands of a violent and extreme ideology with hair-trigger sensitivities.

What’s interesting here is whenever moderate and reasonable Muslims are challenged with plain, clear statements, they immediately jump to absurd conclusions and accuse you of saying things you did not say. In this case, the Muslim “student claimed that I said all Muslims are terrorists; all kill…” the targeted student told The Fix, trailing off. “I don’t know how you could even get any of that from this.” Like the Dutch imam who added a cartoon of Muhammad as a pig when he was distributing the Danish cartoons to incite the ummah. He included the pig Mohammad cartoon in order to make those innocuous cartoons more offensive. Here too, is the same thing. I am sure targeted student, Alex Lonsdale, said nothing outrageous or offensive. But truth is offensive  and haram to the hair-trigger sensibilities of Muslims.  And we are not requiring these supremacists to acclimate and accept Western  values and very way of life. Putting up with being offended is essential in a pluralistic society in which people differ on basic truths. Instead, we are made to bow to their draconian and extreme Islamic speech restrictions.

We are establishing Muslims as a protected class and preventing  honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism. And our children are being forced to submit.

Student suspended for debating Islamic extremism with Muslim peer in debate club

By Kayla Schierbecker – University of Missouri, The College Fix, December 7, 2017 (thanks to Orange Martyrs)

muslim-hijab-jihad.Rommel_Canlas.shutterstock-370x242.jpghttps://www.thecollegefix.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/muslim-hijab-jihad.Rommel_Canlas.shutterstock-135x88.jpg 135w, https://www.thecollegefix.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/muslim-hijab-jihad.Rommel_Canlas.shutterstock-560x367.jpg 560w, https://www.thecollegefix.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/muslim-hijab-jihad.Rommel_Canlas.shutterstock.jpg 580w" alt="" width="370" height="242" />Officials allegedly said it could be ‘harassing,’ told him to observe ‘social cues’A Missouri high school that suspended a student for making critical comments about Islamic extremism says he’s not allowed to appeal the finding of wrongdoing.Senior Alex Lonsdale, a member of Liberty High’s nationally ranked debate club, says he was just trying to have a friendly debate.

During his free period Oct. 17 at the public school near Kansas City, Lonsdale joined a spontaneous conversation among acquaintances about the nature of Islam.

He told The College Fix in a phone call Monday that he pointed to pro-terrorist sentiment among British Muslims, as indicated in polls by ICM Research for the 2016 Channel 4 documentary “What British Muslims Really Think.” The program was presented by the former chair of Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission, Trevor Phillips.

A Muslim sophomore also in the debate club, Faraz Pervaiz, allegedly challenged Lonsdale’s viewpoint on account of his own religious beliefs.

Both students had experience debating policy issues in the club, currently ranked second in the nation by the National Debate & Speech Association, where Liberty competes annually during its national competition.

Lonsdale and a debate partner shared a semifinal placement at the Grain Valley High School New Year Novice Kickoff this year, while Pervaiz and his partner tied for first in policy debate at a high school tournament in December 2016, according to The Kansas City Star.

But the impromptu debate on Islamic extremism, by Lonsdale’s retelling, turned into a raucous imbroglio.

“Why are you making my religion out to be like that?” Lonsdale said Pervaiz asked him. The Muslim student became reticent, apparently no longer wanting to continue debating, before he ended the conversation by leaving, according to Lonsdale.

“I wasn’t saying that ‘you’re a bad kid because you’re Islamic,’” he told The Fix. “I wasn’t being rude. I didn’t personally attack him at all.”

Lonsdale is not the only member of his family to court controversy in an educational setting.

As treasurer of the Young Americans for Liberty chapter at the University of Missouri this spring, his brother Chris was escorted out of a student government meeting for claiming that a candidate ticket tried to rig a disputed election.

‘Emotionally unsafe zone’

Three days after the short-lived debate, Alex Lonsdale was called into a meeting with the principal, vice principal and Pervaiz, where he said he was asked to explain the statements that Pervaiz alleged he made.

Pervaiz “claimed that I said all Muslims are terrorists; all kill…” he told The Fix, trailing off. “I don’t know how you could even get any of that from this.”

School officials told him his behavior could be considered “harassing” or “hounding” and that Lonsdale should be conscious of “social cues,” according to Lonsdale.

He said they accused him of “‘creating an emotionally unsafe zone.’”

MORE: School replaces MLK Day with Islamophobia seminar

After school officials interviewed three other student witnesses, Lonsdale was assigned to serve an in-school suspension the rest of the day and the following day.

Although the school said Lonsdale was not entitled to an appeal, Assistant Principal Bridget Herrman promised Nov. 20 to give him a letter containing the “necessary information about the suspension,” according to emails provided to The Fix.

The letter the school sent his parents, dated the same day, simply said he was suspended “due to behavior” and had been prescribed “corrective disciplinary action.”

4867711846055936.png?k=XrVmGHkE1vh6RVb0xqKr79OAw8w

The in-school suspension actually improved Lonsdale’s productivity, he told The Fix: “I got a lot of work done. I got everything done that I needed to do.” Lonsdale was permitted to leave in-school suspension to participate in some of his four Advanced Placement classes.

Though Pervaiz called Lonsdale “retarded” in their disputed interaction, the Muslim student appears to have escaped discipline, according to Lonsdale, adding that he didn’t want to punish Pervaiz’s speech.

Liberty debate coach Tim Baldwin and speech coach Michael Turpin did not immediately respond Wednesday to emailed requests for comment and to help The Fix reach Pervaiz for comment.

Liberty Public Schools spokesperson Dallas Ackerman declined to comment on behalf of Herrman, the assistant principal. It “is not our practice to comment on student discipline matters,” he told The Fix in an email Tuesday.

‘You need to apologize for how you made Faraz feel’

“I don’t know why that kid [Pervaiz] didn’t just walk away if it made him uncomfortable,” Carrie Lonsdale, Alex’s mother, told The Fix in a phone call Tuesday.

A former Army field medic whose youngest son is also at Liberty High, Carrie was baffled when administrators phoned her to accuse her son of being a bigot.

“My kids tell me everything,” said Carrie, who saw no wrong in her son’s actions as he recounted them.

Lonsdale said he has been ostracized by some students at school: Several now believe he is a racist.

A student who witnessed the debate – and gave a statement supporting Pervaiz to school officials – also had cross words with Lonsdale.

Miles slipped Lonsdale a handwritten letter (below) admonishing him for his “1-sided bash” on Islam and claimed he had equated Islam with terrorism.

“You initiated a 35-minute conversation trying to prove that Faraz’s entire religion was about terrorism,” wrote Miles. “You need to apologize for what you did and how you made Faraz feel.”

MORE: Judge upholds suspensions of students who ‘liked’ racist posts

5569479705886720.png?k=9KzW3aF8zB6Ua0GpZm6vAf7g-vg

According to Carrie, Alex’s only previous scrape with administrators came in October when a student anonymously reported him for bullying. It turned out to be a false report, she said: His teammate on the swim team admitted to making the report in jest.

Lonsdale has been accepted at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, where he applied after his incident with Pervaiz. The conflict gave Lonsdale “no complications” regarding his college prospects, he said.

He plans to study engineering or physics after his Liberty graduation this spring, but until then he hopes to abstain from further spirited debates about religion.

Carrie told The Fix she sees a disconnect between the school’s mission to prepare students for life and the school’s disapproval of uncomfortable topics. School officials say students “need to be responsible, they are young adults,” she said. “And then they treat them like babies.”

Kids “only have one shot” when they go through school, Carrie said: “And if you are screwing with [their] one shot, this is going to screw up the rest of their life because they’ve been through that while they’re [still] young.”

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.


Read more…

Conservative Flag

Conservative Flag

Trump Sets Secret Trap To Catch Obama 24hrs After Rogue UN Official Exposes Active Coup At WH

4.8k
SHARES
From the first day that Trump stepped foot into the White House, Obama is restlessly trying to take him down. He started his agenda by implanting his secret agents into Trump’s government. Obama’s mission is to get his hands on confidential informaion

This wasn’t enough for him, so  he is now engaging a “coup d’etat” against the President. This is happening for the first time in the U.S. history.

As we can see, Obama is having meetings with the world leaders as a civilian, which is serious federal felony. But our President is not sitting with his hands tied. He finally made his move to shut down Obama and his followers and Obama didn’t even saw it coming.

It looks like Obama can’t handle the fact that he no longer has the power that he had as a President. Ever since he was replaced, he’s spending his every second planning on ways to take Trump down.

He operates with his secret government in his mansion that is located 3 miles away from the White House. These past few weeks, Trump had a worldwide tour and what Obama did was following his every move.

As we are finding out, Obama has had meetings with the leaders of China, India and France and he told them that America is currently without leadership.

According to the  18 U.S. Code 2385  Obama is breaking the law with his deeds. His collaboration with foreign governments can put him in prison for 20 years. Obama doesn’t seem to care what the law says because  he is still infiltrating his spies throughout the White House. A recent information is that Trump again found an Obama operative in his inner circle.

Thanks to the CIA agent John R. Maguire, Trump learned that his National security Advisor H.R. McMaster has been one of Obama’s spies for months! He was sharing confidential information and had put up surveillance on the President and his family, and on Steve Bannon as well.

Maguire said that McMaster was using a burner cell to share information of his illegal surveillance to a foreign source. When it was analysed, it was proven that the surveillance vids where sent to a surveillance facility in Cyprus, owned by George Soros.

The Intercept reports:

Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R. McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.”

As an addition to this scandal, the United Nations official John Bolton revealed that there is something more maleficent behind Obama’s world tour. Bolton claimed that Obama is preparing a “coup d’etat” against our President, or as  The Gateway Pundit is transmitting:

“Lou Dobbs and Ambassador Bolton discussed the latest developments in the Mueller witch hunt and Barack Obama’s latest tour across Asia to attack sitting President Trump. “…this is the first coup d’état in American History,” Bolton stated.  “It’s a mini coup d’état but it goes right along with the idea that they (liberals) should have won the election..They are trying to prove the administration is illegitimate.”

Trump has had enough of Obama’s dirty games. In order to stop the infiltration of Obama’s minions, he is launching a spy network. With the help of Erik Prince and John R. Maguire he is planning to  “provide CIA Director Mike Pompeo and the White House with a global, private spy network that would go around the U.S.’s official SWAMP-INFESTED intelligence agencies,”  The Gateway Pundit reported.

Trump’s private spy network is the real-deal for cleaning the corrupted agencies such as the White House. It is crazy how Obama manages to have a bad impact on America, even though he’s retired from his presidency for a year. His work with foreign governments against the President is a serious violation of the  Logan Act, as civilians are forbidden to negotiate with diplomatic leaders against their own.

Sabotaging the President is a severe federal crime, so  McMaster will soon be punished for what he did.
Obama along with his operatives should be prepared for what is coming for them. It won’t be long before the law gets them. The crimes that they did will soon come to an end.

Share this if you are tired of these traitors!

Featured Image Source H/T: Freedom Daily

Read more…