William M. Finley's Posts (2815)
Sort by
California: Muslims demand anonymity in legal jihad, but use Facebook, give TV interviews
( ,Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate )
Islamic supremacy and hypocrisy knows no bounds. Source: Muslims demand anonymity as they sue California café – Bob Unruh
Several Muslim women who insisted that their identities be concealed in a discrimination lawsuit against a California restaurant, claiming their safety was at risk, have gone on the record anyway by posting comments on social media and granting interviews to television stations.
The target of the suit, Urth Caffe of Laguna Beach, California, is now asking permission of the court to add the full names of the women to the lawsuit and to a counter-suit filed by the restaurant, according to a new filing.
WND reported the case arose after restaurant workers asked, in keeping with restaurant policy, a group of Muslim women to move or share their tables in a popular spot at the eatery on a busy night.
The women responded with a discrimination lawsuit against the restaurant, and the restaurant answered with a counter-suit against the women, charging they were engaging in Islamic “lawfare.”
The women had been asked by restaurant workers to abide by a publicly promoted policy to give up or share popular patio tables after 45 minutes. But they refused and eventually left only after police were called.
The women later obtained a lawyer who claimed they were the subjects of religious discrimination and sued. The restaurant’s responding complaint against them cites trespass.
Now the American Freedom Law Center, which is defending the Urth Caffe, is seeking to add the women’s names to the official documents.
“Based upon plaintiffs’ own discovery responses, five of the plaintiffs, which include three of the four ‘anonymous’ plaintiffs claiming to fear for their safety, have publicly criticized defendants and accused them of bigotry and permitted their pictures to be taken by news outlets,” the new court filing said.
“Indeed, while withheld from plaintiffs’ discovery responses, Urth Caffe located an article from a heavily trafficked website that included Facebook quotes from the fourth ‘anonymous’ plaintiff,” the filing explained.
The filing noted that Sara C. in the original complaint is Sara Chamma, Yumna H. is Yumna Hameed, Safa R. is Safa Rawag and Marwa R. is Marwa Raga.
“It is an odd, if not untenable position, to claim a fear of public exposure while exploiting public exposure to generate a social media firestorm by accusing defendants of being bigots and engaging in illegal discrimination,” explained the filing, which was posted online.
“Indeed … only Urth Caffe employees have been the subject of direct criminal threats, which necessitated the filnig of a criminal report by Urth Caffe management with the FBI and local police and employing armed security to escort employees to their automobiles at night,” said the legal filing in Superior Court in Orange County, California.
The “anonymous” women declined several times to provide their full names, the brief explains, but they or their legal representatives had failed to submit a motion to conceal that information.
The Urth Caffe explained that in California, “as in all states and in the federal courts, there is a First Amendment right held by the public to know who is suing whom and this means there is an obligation to sue in your own name and not hide behind a wall of anonymity.”
“There are exceptions to this rule, but these exceptions require a clear showing of harm to the anonymous plaintiffs that outweighs the public’s right to know.
“In this case, the plaintiffs not only refused to provide their names for the public record, but also refused to provide their names to the defendant Urth Caffe pursuant to a protective order that would have kept the names out of the public domain,” the brief said.
Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi noted four of the seven plaintiffs claimed that their safety would be at risk by disclosing their names.
“However, they could point to no instance of a single threat to their safety nor could they point to a single instance where Muslims had sued for discrimination, and there are plenty of high-profile cases to choose from, where a single Muslim was put in harm’s way as a result of the filing of a lawsuit for discrimination in his or her own name.”
He said Urth Caffe “did not discriminate against the women who have filed this fraudulent lawsuit.”
“The claim that these women were asked to leave the café because they were wearing hijabs is laughable given the number of hijab-wearing Urth Caffe customers. After nearly a year of discovery, the plaintiffs have not produced a shred of evidence of discrimination. Yet, the plaintiffs had no problem holding a press conference naming Urth Caffe and individual staff members and labelling them as bigots. ”
Please Share & Help Wake America Up
Never forget: Muslim hate crimes hoaxes
Source: Michelle Malkin | » Never forget: Muslim hate crimes hoaxes
by Michelle Malkin
Another year. Another Sept. 11 anniversary. Another opportunity for grievance-mongering Muslim agitators to decry the imagined “epidemic” of “Islamophobia.”
South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT) convened with Mad Maxine Waters and other House Democrats in Washington, D.C., to mark a somber occasion this week. No, not the coordinated jihadi mass murder of nearly 3,000 innocent people of all races, nationalities and religions on 9/11. Instead, they lamented Sept. 12 — “the 16-year anniversary of the day that South Asian, Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Arab, and Middle Eastern Americans woke up to a new political reality in which the safety of our lives and the security of our homes were irrevocably compromised.”
For left-wing zealots, the bloody lash of worldwide Islamic terrorism pales in comparison to the so-called “backlash” against Muslims. SAALT disseminated prefab tweets and declarations naming President Trump, outspoken anti-sharia activist Brigitte Gabriel and her grass-roots group, ACT for America, as well as “law enforcement, immigration enforcement, vigilantes,” and “white supremacists” as their enemies.
They’re all the same to the tolerance mob.
And “backlash” is a catchall trash can for everything from sideward glances to off-color jokes to offensive cartoons to unresolved crimes to actual acts of intimidation or physical violence. Mixed in with two shootings and a stabbing over the past year classified as hate crimes, SAALT noted that in August, “a Minnesota mosque was firebombed in what the governor rightly declared an ‘act of terrorism.’”
One of those things is not like the other. I contacted the FBI this week to ask about the Minnesota mosque incident. It is unsolved after more than a month, and a $30,000 reward for information remains unclaimed. An agent based in Minneapolis acknowledged to me that “it’s always a possibility” that the crime may be a hoax.
That’s what the Sept. 12 gripers want you to forget: People lie. And too many Muslim opportunists deceive in order to distract and divide.
Just two weeks ago, an alleged hate crime fell apart after a 22-year-old Muslim man admitted he had “exaggerated” an assault in a Durham, Ontario park restroom. Canadian police dropped charges against a 57-year-old man whom the Muslim man claimed had shouted anti-Muslim epithets and punched him in the face.
“We could have charged him with obstructing police or mischief and he was cautioned for those two offences,” a police official told the Toronto Sun. But the faker escaped without punishment.
In late August, Indiana State University professor Azhar Hussain received one year’s probation for fabricating anti-Muslim threats and an assault. He pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of obstruction for justice and harassment after lying to cops this spring about being attacked and sending anti-Muslim hate mails to the school.
“Based upon the investigation, it is our belief that Hussain was trying to gain sympathy by becoming a victim of anti-Muslim threats, which he had created himself,” the campus police chief concluded.
In June, a small fire at a Des Moines, Iowa, mosque generated national headlines — until a young Muslim woman was arrested for starting it.
“Security cameras in the mosque showed a woman, later identified as Aisha Ismail, 22, pouring lighter fluid on the carpet and then starting the fire,” police reported. “It doesn’t appear that she was trying to burn the place down,” the local chief said. “It seems like she was trying to make a statement.”
In Houston, a “suspicious” fire at a Houston mosque in 2015 turned out to have been set by one of the center’s own worshipers who prayed there five times a day for five years. The unindicted terror-funding co-conspirators at CAIR-Houston had clamored for law enforcement authorities to “investigate a possible bias motive for this fire” due to “the recent spike in hate incidents targeting mosques nationwide.”
That same year, New Yorker Kashif Parvaiz was convicted of murdering his wife in front of his child after police debunked his cover story of being attacked by a group of bigots who called the family “terrorists.”
For every rare and bona fide act of “Islamophobia” in North America, there are multiple acts of Islamo-faux-bia ginned up to stir attention, milk public compassion and generate unfounded fear.
It’s bad enough when the Islamo-faux-bists operate any other time of year. It’s downright disgusting when they exploit the true horrors of 9/11 to hype their delusions of systemic post-9/12 oppression and collective victimhood.
Robert Spencer on Breitbart Radio: Left Using Charlottesville as ‘Reichstag Fire Moment to Crush All Dissent’
Open season on the freedom of speech.
“Robert Spencer: Left Using Charlottesville as ‘Reichstag Fire Moment to Crush All Dissent,’” by John Hayward, Breitbart, September 14, 2017:
Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch director, joined SiriusXM host Raheem Kassam on Thursday’s Breitbart News Daily to discuss the congressional resolution calling upon President Trump to condemn hate groups.
Kassam proposed that without precise, nonpartisan definitions of what constitutes a “hate group,” the congressional resolution is tantamount to declaring “open season on free speech.”
“Oh, absolutely, and it’s extraordinarily insidious as well,” Spencer agreed. “Remember, of course, that the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies legitimate conservative organizations that dissent from the leftist line as ‘hate groups.’”
“This resolution specifically refers to white supremacists, white nationalists, Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups – so what this is, is yet another element of the left’s attempt to use Charlottesville as its Reichstag Fire moment, to crush all dissent,” he warned.
“They lump us in with the Klan and neo-Nazis, and now, they have the president committing to use all available resources – that’s what the resolution says – against us. There’s no doubt in my mind whatsoever, and I’m sure there’s none in yours, as well, that this will be used against us. The Klan and the neo-Nazis, in reality, are insignificant and negligible forces. This is about us,” he told Kassam.
In that context, Spencer said the prospect of President Trump’s signing an amnesty deal to ratify the DACA amnesty for illegal immigrants is “chilling because it’s very clear what’s being done here.”
“They’ve backed the president into a corner because they’ve accused him, they’ve accused his close associates, people like Steve Bannon, of being white nationalists and white supremacists,” he explained. “The people who sponsored this resolution see this as Trump turning against the people who elected him and turning against the principles upon which he was elected. The problem is, apparently the president has allowed himself to be backed into this corner and is not sufficiently aware of what’s happening to stop it.”
Spencer said the best hope for protecting freedom of speech may lie with the Supreme Court President Trump is shaping with the addition of justices such as Neil Gorsuch. He hoped Gorsuch would vote to “strike down any attempts to give this resolution teeth and to persecute people who are legitimate conservative voices on its basis.”
Kassam noted that Spencer is well positioned to understand how “hate speech” regulations can be twisted into political weapons since Spencer himself has been banned from the United Kingdom. Kassam worried that a European-style assault on free speech is underway in America.
“The fact is, Raheem, remember: when they say that the president has to use all available resources against the KKK, neo-Nazis, and ‘other hate groups,’ there is no competitor to the SPLC. The Southern Poverty Law Center is the only organization that publishes a list of hate groups,” Spencer said in agreement, noting that his own Jihad Watch is on that list.
“The people that the Southern Poverty Law Center is targeting is not really the Klan and neo-Nazis, but the reasonable organizations that dissent from the leftist agenda that they’ve lumped in with the Klan and neo-Nazis,” he said.
“When the government, if and when the Trump administration and/or some other aspect of the United States government goes up against these hate groups and starts to use all available resources against them, the only list they have of the groups to target is the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list. This means that a significant portion of conservative thought that is anti-immigration, that is in favor of traditional values, and that is against jihad terror is going to be targeted,” Spencer predicted.
Robert Spencer’s latest book is The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies).
Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Eastern.
Paris: Muslim screaming “Allah” attacks soldier with knife outside metro station
“The victim managed to wrestle him to the ground and he was arrested by armed police as he shouted ISIS slogans.”
Doubtless he will be given a psychiatric examination as investigators begin to try to understand his motive.
“BREAKING NEWS: Knifeman shouting ‘Allah’ attacks a soldier on patrol in Paris,” by Peter Allen, MailOnline, September 15, 2017:
A knife wielding man has attacked a French soldier outside a Metro station in Paris today while praising Allah.
The attacker approached the soldier from behind and then lunged at him with the blade at Chatelet metro station at 6.30am this morning.
The victim managed to wrestle him to the ground and he was arrested by armed police as he shouted ISIS slogans.
The unidentified man is said to have rushed at a patrol of soldiers wearing combat uniforms and brandishing assault rifles.
‘He was restrained, and nobody was injured,’ said a source investigating the case on Friday morning.
The man was taken to the main Chateletpolice [sic] station, and now faces a range of terrorist charges.
It is the latest in a long string ofattacks [sic] on service personnel involved in Operation Sentinelle – an initiative involving 10,000 soldiers and 4700 gendarmes and police.
They were first deployed in November 2015 following a single night of violence by Islamic State suicide bombers that saw 130 people murdered in the French capital.
The soldiers’ job is to protect vulnerable areas ofthe [sic] capital, including transport hubs such as Chatelet, which is used by thousands of commuters and tourists every day.
But many have complained that they are now easy targets themselves, with lone wolf attackers regularly trying to kill or wound them….
Extremely Racist Black ESPN Reporter Says ALL White People Are NAZIS- Look What Just Happened!
Sean Brown AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS –
People are royally ticked off at ESPN contributor Jemele Hill, and rightfully so – she called the President, and basically all of his supporters, white supremacists.
While ESPN has a history of firing hosts who say controversial things, such as Kurt Schilling, who tweeted a meme about transgender bathrooms, Hill appears to have escaped the incident unscathed. In fact, in the weakest statement ever, ESPN basically gave her a slap on the wrist and said everyone should move on.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out why, either.
However, while ESPN doesn’t seem to mind the vile hatred and bigotry expressed by Hill, America reacted rather fiercely to the racist tweet from her. But despite widespread backlash, which included White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee-Sanders calling for Hill’s termination, she still refused to apologize to Trump or his supporters.
In fact, rather than apologize, she tweeted a statement that should have everyone enraged.
https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill-300x253.jpg 300w, https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill-65x55.jpg 65w" data-lazy-sizes="(max-width: 497px) 100vw, 497px" width="497" height="419" />
“My comments on Twitter expressed my personal beliefs. My regret is that my comments and the public way I made them painted ESPN in an unfair light. My respect for the company and my colleagues remains unconditional.”
Hardly a remorseful statement from Hill. But then again, she’s a black liberal, so she likely hasn’t ever been held accountable for anything, much less her blind hatred for white people and our white President.
As you would imagine, Twitter was quick to point out the hypocrisy:
https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill1-300x185.jpg 300w, https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill1-89x55.jpg 89w" data-lazy-sizes="(max-width: 497px) 100vw, 497px" width="497" height="307" /> 
https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill2-696x406.jpg 696w, https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill2-94x55.jpg 94w, https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill2.jpg 497w" data-lazy-sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="176" /> 
https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill3-109x55.jpg 109w, https://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1ahill3.jpg 500w" data-lazy-sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="152" />
How nice. Don’t ever let anyone tell you that either liberal or black privilege aren’t real things.
They are, and this entire ordeal with Hill is proof positive of them.
School Board Bans Pre-Game Prayer but Players Find a Way
A West Virginia high school football program that received national attention last year after its county was one of many devastated by historic flooding is once again in the national spotlight.
As WSAZ-TV reported, last football season one person complained about Clay County High School’s longstanding tradition of having the Lord’s Prayer be read aloud before football games.
This complaint resulted in Clay County school leaders banning the act altogether and instead implementing a new rule that would allow for a moment of silence during which players and fans would be allowed to use the time as they please.
The players from both Clay County and opposing Braxton County made sure to use that time to exercise their God-given right.
Before the game began, players, coaches and cheerleaders from both teams met at midfield to recite the prayer — not as rivals or adversaries, but as one.
People in the stands joined in as well.
The prayer has become closely associated with football, as it is often a staple of pregame rituals for many football teams from youth leagues to the pros.
“This is a situation that is unfortunately out of our hands,” said Clay County Schools Superintendent Joe Paxton. “The U.S. Supreme Court is the supreme law of the land.”
Paxton was referencing the district’s decision to ban the prayer because of the 1962 Supreme Court decision that barred prayer at school.
In an act of defiance, many fans arrived to the stadium wearing shirts that read, “I’m gonna pray anyway.”
Clay County High School Principal Crystal Gibson insisted that she, like many others in the stands, would be praying during the moment of silence.
“During that moment of silence, if anyone wishes to pray, by all means I wish that they would,” Gibson said. “That’s their right to do so and I’ll be doing so at that same time.” (For more from the author of “School Board Bans Pre-Game Prayer but Players Find a Way” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/09/school-board-bans-pre-game-prayer-players-find-way/
I honestly have given up on Europe and the UK as far as its response to Islamic Terrorism is concerned. Based on the posts I have seen to terror attacks in London and elsewhere in the EU, it is my firm belief now that within 20 years you will see the UK and several countries in the EU (Sweden, France, Denmark and some others) going Islamic and everything that entails, including Sharia Law, inferior status of women, honor killings, stoning of women, Muslim dietary laws forced on the general populace, etc.. It is only a matter of time since their respective governments do not have the stomach to combat Islamic extremism in their countries other than applying after the fact reactionary law enforcement type approaches after a terrorist attack has occurred. Other than newly liberated Eastern European countries like Hungary, the Czech Republic and a few others, they are finished since their people have lost the will to fight.
London Terror Attack: Second Bomb Found
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
“Britain has become a war zone.”
But no worries, the Brits have banned me (and Robert Spencer). Banning those of us who oppose jihad terror has surely kept them safer.
London terror attack: Claims second bomb was at Parsons Green
A SECOND bomb at Parsons Green Tube station, in West London, is being deactivated by bomb squad experts, after an initial explosion on a train, according to reports.
By Jon Rogers, The Express, Sep 15, 2017:
Authorities are said to be deactivating a second improvised explosive device found at the scene where several commuters were injured after an explosion.
Met Police refused to comment, saying there was “an incident” at the London tube station.
A journalist for The Daily Telegraph has tweeted: “Police just told us there is a second bomb they are trying to deactivate. #Parsonsgreen”
In a later tweet she wrote: “Police officer at scene: ‘There has been a terror attack on the train. Get inside’.”
At around 8.20am today an explosion ripped through a packed tube train at Parsons Green on the District line, between Earls Court and Wimbledon.
Pictures posted on social media appeared to show wires protruding from a flaming bucket inside a plastic carrier bag on the floor of a carriage.
However eyewitnesses said victims suffered facial injuries after a what appeared to be a homemade bomb exploded.One witness said there were “lots” of people injured after the explosion and a subsequent stampede.The Metropolitan police have said that emergency services are still at the scene and have asked people to avoid the area.
Prime Minister Theresa May is “receiving regular updates,” according to officials.
British counter-terrorism police are monitoring events but the investigation into the incident is being led by transport police, a security source said.
Met Police have confirmed the incident as being a terror attack.
Reuters
The home made device on the tube train at Parsons Green
Officers from the Metropolitan Police’s counter-terrorism command have launched an investigation following the explosion in west London during the Friday morning rush hour.The force said police were called at approximately 8.20am to Parsons Green Underground Station “following reports of a fire on the train”.The Met said Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, the national co-ordinator for counter-terrorism policing, “has declared it a terrorist incident”, adding: “At present we are aware of a number of people who have suffered i Subscribe To Our Newsletter
/
PREFER TO GIVE MONTHLY? CLICK HERE
Fund The Fight
YOU make the work possible.
Donate Today
Professor to Tucker Carlson: Antifa has the right to physically beat opponents — Video
By Joe Newby -
September 15, 2017
While appearing on Fox News, Mike Isaacson, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice who supports the radical far-left Antifa , told Tucker Carlson that the group has the right to physically beat political opponents, Mediaite and others reported Thursday.
According to Isaacson, “communities have the right to defend themselves against groups that actively seek to eliminate members of that community.”
“Defend themselves against violence?” Carlson asked.
“Yes, against violence.” Isaacson said in response.
Mediaite added:
After the Fox News host tried to push back, Isaacson mockingly asked if we’re “going to pretend” that violent racists like Dylann Roof didn’t exist.
“Are you really a professor, by the way?” Carlson shot back.
Carlson asked for an example for a public figure who should have their free speech “taken away,” Isaacson invoked alt-right leader Richard Spencer and called him a “danger to society.”
“When he speaks in public, what he is doing- he is publicly recruiting people to his very violent movement, very violent ideology,” Isaacson said.
When pressed by Carlson if he thought Spencer “had the right to speak in public,” Isaacson said he doesn’t think Spencer has a right to speak in public “unopposed.”
“But it’s not opposition,” Carlson argued. “You shut people down, you prevent people from speaking, you commit violence against them.”
When Carlson asked if that violence was justified, Isaacson said “yes.”
“I believe communities have the right to defend themselves against threats to their communities,” Isaacson reiterated.
“Against ideas they don’t like!” Carlson responded
Here’s video of the segment:http://conservativefiringline.com/professor-tucker-carlson-antifa-right-physically-beat-oppone
Isaacson, the Daily Caller said, is a co-founder of the Antifa organization Smash Racism D.C. and recently laughed at dead police officers in a series of tweets.
According to the Daily Caller:
Isaacson shared his support of political violence in an interview with The Hill Thursday, which was pointed out by Far Left Watch. The article, which explores the Antifa movement and its proponents in academia, got a few choice quotes from the professor.
“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” Isaacson said.
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” he continued. “I don’t think anyone should think that someone who is intent on politically organizing for the sake of creating a state-sponsored genocide — I don’t think is something that we should protect.”
Translation: A criminal justice “professor” thinks people with whom he disagrees are Nazis who should be physically assaulted.
And, the Daily Caller noted, Isaacson has a pretty strange idea of what defines a “fascist.”
In parts of Brooklyn, NY, you are forced to wake up at the crack of dawn everyday
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
In this once predominantly Jewish and Italian neighborhood, Muslims blasting the highly offensive, amplified Islamic Call to Prayer five times a day is effectively ethnically cleansing the area.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOdDYS8PNPw
Share this news
SWEDISH POLICE are so inundated with reports of rape and sexual molestations of children by Muslim migrants, they don’t even have time to investigate most of them
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CWtYHCVUkAAif2q-vi-1-e1505344215641.png?resize=399%2C248" alt="" width="399" height="248" />When Swedish Journalist, Joakim Lamotte, contacted authorities about the status of a case involving a 12-year-old girl who was dragged into a restroom by a Muslim man in the center of Stenungsund, before being beaten, raped and threatened with death, he was told they haven’t had time to interrogate the suspect – even two months later – despite knowing his name and address.
Zerohedge Swedish authorities are so inundated with countless cases of rape by Muslim invaders, they are physically unable to cope with the backlog of cases. As a result of this, the 12-year-old girl is still being confronted and taunted by the rapist in her neighborhood.
When pressured by the journalist about the 12-year-old victim, he was told by police, “We have 3-year-old rape victims whose Muslim rapist we have not had time to interrogate, let alone prosecute. These are the realities and it’s terribly regrettable. That’s all I can say about it.”
Sex crimes in the Sweden have doubled since 2012. The most recently available statistics showed that Muslim migrants were 5.5 times more likely to carry out sexual assaults.
Allowing government to censor speech of unpopular groups will lead to suppression of views not approved by government”
Here is a good article on why our race toward authoritarianism and the forcible suppression of unpopular opinions may be ill-advised.
Here is the video of the Cal Poly event that is discussed in this article:
“Freedom of speech under fire,” by Al Fonzi, New Times, September 14, 2017:
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8GlY2zwZhg
Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States and the primary author of the Declaration of Independence, repeatedly affirmed the rights of conscience as embodied in the First Amendment’s protection of speech, religion, and peaceful assembly. To quote him:
“No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience.”
What was Jefferson referring to as “conscience”? Prior to the American Revolution, particularly in the early 1700s and late 1600s, Americans were forced to support churches not of their choosing. In some colonies, ministers of non-approved denominations were imprisoned and even hanged. From the memory of this intolerance came insistence upon a Bill of Rights being included in the newly ratified Constitution.
For 200 years these rights were tested and expanded by the courts into a clearly defined body of law that protected the most important rights of humanity: the right to speak your mind without fear of legal prosecution. It doesn’t mean that there won’t be social or economic repercussions; others have the right to disagree with your speech and exercise their own First Amendment right by sanctioning your speech via social isolation and vehemently disagreeing with your views while expounding upon their own. Objectionable speech is best opposed by reasoned speech, not by mob violence or censorship by government.
A growing, disturbing trend from a once vigorous defender of free speech emanates from the academic community. A few years ago I attended an event at Cal Poly that hosted Dr. Robert Spencer who specialized in the intellectual fight against radical Islamic Jihad. A number of Cal Poly students attended, most from various social science disciplines. As soon as Spencer began to speak, a number of students angrily left the room as a form of protest against Spencer’s message, exercising their disagreement via the First Amendment without, however, hearing a word he had to say. A number of Muslim students remained for Spencer’s entire talk, asking pointed questions at the end of the event.
At the end of Spencer’s talk a young woman stated that Spencer shouldn’t be allowed to speak on college campuses as her First Amendment rights protected her against (what she considered) hate speech. She was a senior, scheduled to graduate in a few weeks, a sad commentary on how indoctrination has replaced critical thinking in our universities. Several attorneys present in the audience proceeded to correct her misinterpretation of the First Amendment, which protects objectionable speech against the tyranny of the majority….
Allowing the government to censor the speech of unpopular groups will inevitably lead to suppression of all views not approved by the government.
With freedom of speech under heavy assault, Hillary says message of 1984 is “Trust Big Brother”
“Nineteen Eighty-Four is famous for the term ‘doublespeak’ — a powerful form of propaganda that deliberately obscures, disguises, or reverses the meaning of words. In the book, the government destroys the very purpose of language by insisting that ‘War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.'”
Nowadays the Orwellian line is “Islam is a religion of peace.” And then there’s “hate speech is not free speech.”
“Orwell’s point in 1984 was that the very kind of technocratic progressivism which Hillary Clinton praises as the solution to all social ills is itself the deep and abiding threat.”
Yes, and it’s coming down fast, and unless large numbers of people wake up quickly to what is happening, it will very soon be upon us.
“Has Hillary Lost Her Grip on Reality? ‘Rely on Big Brother’ Was NOT the Message of Orwell’s 1984,” by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, September 13, 2017:
In her new book What Happened, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took a shot at literary interpretation — and twisted George Orwell’s book 1984 to mean the exact opposite of what it really means.
“Attempting to define reality is a core feature of authoritarianism,” Clinton wrote. “This is what the Soviets did when they erased political dissidents from historical photos. This is what happens in George Orwell’s classic novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, when a torturer holds up four fingers and delivers electric shocks until his prisoner sees five fingers as ordered.”
So far, so good. Then Clinton draws the exact wrong message from Orwell’s classic. “The goal is to make you question logic and reason and to sow mistrust toward exactly the people we need to rely on: our leaders, the press, experts who seek to guide public policy based on evidence, ourselves,” she bizarrely added.
But Clinton wasn’t done. “For Trump, as with so much he does, it’s about simple dominance,” she concluded.
Writer and lecturer James Heartfield noted that Clinton’s interpretation is a “bizarre misreading.”
One Twitter user cleverly pointed out how Clinton’s own interpretation of 1984 uses “doublespeak” to subvert the very message of the classic work.
This literary analysis of Clinton’s paragraph hit the nail on the head. The former secretary of State started out by correctly explaining Orwell’s point — authoritarianism does indeed try to redefine reality.
Nineteen Eighty-Four is famous for the term “doublespeak” — a powerful form of propaganda that deliberately obscures, disguises, or reverses the meaning of words. In the book, the government destroys the very purpose of language by insisting that “War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.”
Both the Left and the Right have pushed narratives that dismiss and demonize the other side, but Clinton’s use of propaganda here was rather obvious. Again, she wrote, “The goal is to make you question logic and reason and to sow mistrust toward exactly the people we need to rely on: our leaders, the press, experts who seek to guide public policy based on evidence, ourselves.”
In 1984, every single one of those groups besides “ourselves” is in on the propaganda game. The political leaders are controlling the narrative, erasing history and even words from existence. The press is an arm of the state, pushing the big government’s propaganda (sound familiar?). A powerful group of “experts” use their position to oppress the people, and Orwell reveals this system directly, as the main character works in the administration.
Orwell’s point in 1984 was that the very kind of technocratic progressivism which Hillary Clinton praises as the solution to all social ills is itself the deep and abiding threat. Since the late 1890s onward, progressivism has placed tremendous faith in scientific “experts” to reshape society, and the governing administrative state is a direct result of this movement.
Clinton, as leader of the party of big government, is infamous for pushing the all-consuming liberal narrative of political correctness, which brooks no opposition or question. She unequivocally embraced “intersectionality” during the campaign, championing “oppressed” groups which actually exert political power and dismissing those who would dare to disagree as “deplorables.”…
This is why Hillary Clinton’s misreading of Orwell is so dangerous. So many liberals see themselves as being on the side of the angels, and they cannot come to grips with the fact that millions of Americans disagree with them, for rational reasons that have nothing to do with racism or “hate.”…
BREAKING: Muslim shouting Allahu Akbar attacks seven people including three police officers in Toulouse
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate
Yet another strike in the world war that Western authorities don’t want to admit is being fought.
“BREAKING NEWS: Man ‘shouting Allahu Akbar attacks seven people including three police officers in Toulouse,'” by Charlie Moore, Mailonline, September 13, 2017:
A former psychiatric patient viciously punched four passers-by then attacked three police officers while screaming Allahu Akbar in Toulouse today.
The enraged man, 42, began beating shoppers in the French city at around 4pm before police who were only metres away swooped in.
The assailant kicked and punched the officers before they managed to contain and arrest him.
He continued to shout Allahu Akbar – Arabic for God is Great – as he was wrestled to the ground before bursting into tears.
Footage shows the man being handcuffed and lifted on to a stretcher before being taken hospital.
One witness said: ‘We were chatting and he jumped on us. He first caught my son and then beat my daughter. We just ran.’…
French police say the alleged perpetrator was released from a psychiatric hospital in April….
|  |
|
|---|
|
NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
Thursday, September 14, 2017
A friend of mine and I were talking last night about future Democratic Party candidates for President. He was telling me about a Zogby Analytics poll of likely Democratic Party voters who ranked the candidates for which they would most likely vote in 2020. There were three that rose to the top: Senator Bernie Sanders (Socialist-VT), Former Vice President Joe Biden, and Senator Elizabeth Warren (Democrat Progressive-MA). Our main question to one another that we really couldn't answers was: How do these people get where they are? When Joe Biden emerges as the most sane among them, there is a tremendous problem within the Democratic Party. But Hillary Clinton is a tremendous indicator.
Unlike any losing presidential candidate in history, Clinton has come out of her post-campaign depression swinging. She is blaming Sanders, the ex-"president," women, men, government agency leaders, Russia, racists, misogyny, bigotry, and any other terms she can for losing the election. It is kind of a meltdown in public. Clinton was on CNN the other night talking about relieving her stress from losing the election by using a yoga technique of alternating breathing from her nostrils. Worse yet, CNN's Anderson Cooper actually tolerated and encouraged this nonsense. Some Democrat office holders and insiders, according to The Hill, just wish she would shut up and go away.
Clinton is unable to admit that she, herself, was a flawed candidate and ran a flawed campaign. Even according to her own campaign operatives, who remain in the shadows and do not want to be named by the press, Clinton wants to blame everyone except herself for her loss. The Clinton meltdown has sucked the air out of attempts by other Democratic Party leaders to unite their base, integrate the socialists/progressives into the party mainstream, and move on to the issues upon which they want to focus. Clinton appears bitter, mean-spirited, and unable to accept responsibility for a loss when she had the news media, the pollsters, and leftist organizations tilting the scales in her favor.
Imagine if she would have been president. Imagine if things didn't go her way or she was criticized even a fraction of what the current President has been. Would her delusional state cause her to react in such a way that would harm us all, never accepting responsibility for her own actions? These are legitimate questions not only for Clinton, but also for the three frontrunners who would assume the role of the next Democratic Party presidential nominee. All three-Sanders, Warren and Biden-have demonstrated similar characteristics as Clinton. As Psalm 14:1 says, "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that do good." And therein is the problem with all of these-While they say they know God, their actions prove otherwise. Remember them for the future.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson
PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!
ANTIFA: Violence is Necessary
The extreme liberal movement Antifa, anti-fascists, are continuing to protest President Trump all throughout the nation. They claim their use of violence is ‘necessary’ to combat authoritarianism and they are not sorry about it.
‘Experts’ and activists alike in the Antifa movement agree that the ‘use of force is intrinsic to their political philosophy,’ the Hill reports.
“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, founder of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.
Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism.
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.
“I don’t think anyone should think that someone who is intent on politically organizing for the sake of creating a state-sponsored genocide — I don’t think is something that we should protect.”
This report comes after it was revealed Antifa has started a violent anti-cop ‘workshop’ titled “Our Enemies in Blue”.
The program is being touted on various alt-left websites — including It’s Going Down, Sub.Media and Insurrection News — and are promoting it as a “Revolutionary Abolitionist Movement” (RAM). They are openly calling for violence against the police.
The group published a press release: in it they disclosed their plan to serve as a protective barrier to mosques that “are being ruthlessly bombed” (are they talking about America?) and the alleged systematic battering of LGBTQ community. “The destruction of black life continues unabated as millions languish in the plantations of the modern day slave system,” it states.
The ‘heroins’ of RAM includes Mumia Abu Jamal, “the Black Panther activist who shot and killed Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner in 1981,” and Russell Shoats, “who shot a police officer in the back five times in 1970.”
Far Left Watch has outlined the goals of RAM, which is everything from “Abolition of Gender” to the “Expropriation and the Cooperative Economy.” ‘Much of this borrows from the leftist guerilla movement known as the Rojava Revolution in northern Syria, who are currently involved in battling ISIS,’ reports the Daily Wire.
It has been reported, by the Daily Caller, that RAM has been holding different anti-police workshops
including: “Legal Training”, “Introduction to Anarchism,” and “Our Enemies in Blue,” which deals with
actual actions against the police–or how to handle law enforcement during violent clashes.
A high-school math teacher in Woodstock, Georgia, has been removed from her classroom after she ordered two of her students to cover the “Make America Great Again” slogan of President Trump and compared it to a swastika.
As WND reported, Lyn Orletsky was a math teacher at River Ridge High School on Aug. 31 when she told her students: “Just like you cannot wear a swastika in school, you cannot wear [Make America Great Again] like that.”
She asked them to flip their shirts inside out or leave.
The Cherokee County School District apologized and said the teenagers were not in trouble.
“Her actions were wrong, as the ‘Make America Great Again’ shirts worn by the students are not a violation of our school district dress code,” Cherokee County Schools spokeswoman Barbara Jacoby said at the time. (Read more from “Action Taken on Teacher Who Booted Kids for Trump Slogan” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/09/action-taken-teacher-booted-kids-trump-slogan/
Action Taken on Teacher Who Booted Kids for Trump Slogan
A high-school math teacher in Woodstock, Georgia, has been removed from her classroom after she ordered two of her students to cover the “Make America Great Again” slogan of President Trump and compared it to a swastika.
As WND reported, Lyn Orletsky was a math teacher at River Ridge High School on Aug. 31 when she told her students: “Just like you cannot wear a swastika in school, you cannot wear [Make America Great Again] like that.”
She asked them to flip their shirts inside out or leave.
The Cherokee County School District apologized and said the teenagers were not in trouble.
“Her actions were wrong, as the ‘Make America Great Again’ shirts worn by the students are not a violation of our school district dress code,” Cherokee County Schools spokeswoman Barbara Jacoby said at the time. (Read more from “Action Taken on Teacher Who Booted Kids for Trump Slogan” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/09/action-taken-teacher-booted-kids-trump-slogan/
Sep 15 2017
Every Western nation that has opened its borders to Muslim illegal aliens posing as asylum seekers needs to read this
Middle East Forum One evening, the blue-grey sky grumbled shortly after sunset. The thick clouds blackened and rain poured down over the city with a roar. As I ran across the slippery pavement into a friend’s bar, I heard a group of five poor souls speaking Persian with a Turkic accent and running amok, seeking shelter under the eaves of a building.
A quarter of an hour later I found them in front of my friend’s bar, totally soaked. I went out and asked them if they spoke English; they shook their heads. I asked them in Turkish if they spoke Turkish. With glittering eyes, three of them cheerfully said, “Evet!” [“Yes” in Turkish]. I told them they could come into the bar if they liked. They hesitated but politely declined. I asked if they needed food, water, or cigarettes.
Nearly two years later, on a beautiful and cool summer evening, I met A. at a bar on the same island. A., a Syrian refugee, often spends his evenings bar-hopping with his Western friends. Those friends are mostly romantic European social workers who, I observed several times, sport t-shirts, bags, and laptops festooned with the Palestinian flag. They are on the island to help the unfortunate Muslim refugees who are fleeing war in their native countries.
“I’ll tell you strictly Muslim-to-Muslim,” A. said in good English after having poured down a few shots of whiskey. “These (European social workers) are silly. I don’t know why on earth they are in love with a Muslim cause that even some of us Muslims despise.”
Last year, three Afghans stopped in front of my house on the same island and asked for drinking water. I gave them three bottles and asked if they needed anything else. Coffee? They accepted and sat down in the garden chairs.
Over coffee, they said they were glad to be hosted “not by an infidel on this infidel island” but by a Muslim. The young Afghan who was dressed like a dancer from a cheap hip-hop clip on MTV said, “One day we good Muslims will conquer their infidel lands.” I asked why he was receiving “infidel” money for living. “It’s just halal,” he answered. “They [‘infidels’] are too easy to fool.”
M., another fluently English-speaking Syrian, gave me a long lecture on the wonderful governance of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. “Turkey is the best country in the world!” M. said. ” Erdoğan is the leader of the ummah.”
I asked why he had risked his life to cross illegally from the “best country in the world” to the “poor, infidel lands.” “I want to go to Europe to increase the Muslim population there,” he said. “I want to make a Muslim family there. I want to have plenty of children.” I reminded him that Greece, too, is a European country. No it’s not, he answered.
Almost all the illegal migrants on that and other Greek islands want to get to Germany, where they have heard from friends and relatives that they will be the best paid for being “poor” refugees.
The cliché “the-poor-souls-are-fleeing-war-in-their-native-country” is becoming less and less convincing every day. True, most Syrians fled to Turkey after the start of civil war in their country. But why did they then risk their lives to squeeze into 12-man rubber boats with 40-50 other people, including children and the elderly? Because of war in Turkey? No.
Despite political instability and insecurity for all, there is technically no war in Turkey. It is a Muslim country whose mostly Muslim migrants want to leave it as soon as possible for non-Muslim Europe.
They reach the shores of the Greek islands, which are so beautiful that people from across the world fly there for their holidays. But the islands are not good enough. They want to go to Athens. Why? Because there is war on the Greek islands? No. It’s because Athens is the start of the exit route to the Balkans.
Apply the same logic to Serbia, Hungary, and Austria. Like Greece, none of those countries will be good enough for the refugees. Why not? Because there is war in Serbia or Hungary or Austria? Or because “my cousin tells me Germans pay the best?”
Turkey’s leaders often threaten Europe that they will “open the gates” and flood Europe with millions of refugees. They should ask themselves instead why those Muslim refugees are so eager to leave the “new Turkish empire” if given the chance. Why would they choose not to live a comfortable life in a powerful and peaceful Muslim country and instead flock to the “infidel” west?
Erdoğan blames the West for the tragedy. He has criticized the West for having taken only 250,000 Syrian refugees. In 2016, then Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said the United Nations Security Council’s five permanent members (the US, Russia, Britain, France, and China), should pay the price, not Syria’s [Muslim] neighbors.
It is ironic that millions of Muslims are trying, through dangerous means, to reach the borders of a civilization they have historically blamed for all the world’s evils, including those of their own countries. The “romantic” West does not question why millions of West-hating Muslims are heading in their direction. Or is it “Islamophobic” to point out that there is no war in Greece, Serbia, Hungary, or Austria?
By BareNakedIslam • Muslim Invaders • 0