William M. Finley's Posts (2815)

Sort by

Supreme Court reinstates Trump travel ban

This is the choice: some harmless people will be kept out, or some harmful people will be let in. That’s it. And this should never have had to go to the Supreme Court, as the law is quite clear:

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

“Supreme Court reinstates Trump travel ban,” Associated Press, June 26, 2017:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is letting the Trump administration enforce its 90-day ban on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.

The action Monday is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his young presidency.

Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours being cleared by courts….

Read more…

France and Germany: Before Islam and After Islam

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

58

You can measure the health/the freedom of any given society by the number of burkas on the street.

The speed of the deterioration of freedom of quality of life in European countries that opened their borders to the massive Muslim migration is breathtaking. This will not end well.

Germany before al hijah (immigration jihad)


64,119

Videos thanks to Iexion

Another development in the wake of the Muslim migration. Police now wear chain mail to protect against Muslim ax attacks

France

And Afghanistan:

Iran:

Egypt:

1959:

1978:

1995:

2004:

Read more…

Robert Spencer: Muslim Brotherhood-linked Rep. Keith Ellison falsely claims 35 mosques attacked under Trump

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

16

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

The Daily Caller reported Wednesday that Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, claims that since Donald Trump became President of the United States, thirty-five mosques around the country have been attacked. Ellison was, as will come as a surprise to no one familiar with his career, lying.

The Caller noted that in his tweet claiming this, “Ellison links to a Buzzfeed article that claims there have been around 35 ‘incidents of threats, vandalism and arson at U.S. mosques since January.’ The figure is roughly based on an outdated statistic mentioned in a March press release from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).”

Many of these “hate crimes” were just crimes: “The ACLU listed several burglaries in Alabama that targeted mosque donation boxes. But according to a police statement, authorities found ‘no evidence that these crimes are hate crime related.’ Another example involves a 16-year-old boy who set fire to a mosque, but authorities do not believe the arson was a hate crime. The ACLU also lists the murder of a young Muslim woman outside a mosque that occurred Sunday. Police currently believe the crime was a ‘road rage incident’ and not a hate crime….Ellison mischaracterizes some of the incidents CAIR reported by calling them ‘attacks,’ exaggerating instances like hate mail by including them in the 35-number from his tweet.”

Amazon Never Expected the Competition from This Shopping Site
Tophatter
Sponsored by Revcontent
Find Out More >
18,336

We have seen this kind of thing many times before. For years, Islamic advocacy groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have wildly exaggerated the incidence of anti-Muslim hate crime, often misrepresenting crimes committed by Muslims themselves as anti-Muslim hate crimes, in order to portray Muslims in the U.S. as victims of widespread persecution. In reality, FBI statistics show that Jews are twice as likely to be victims of hate crimes as Muslims.

The objective is clearly to deflect counter-terror efforts, claiming that Muslims are more victimized than victimizer, and that counter-terror efforts are part of that victimization. Ellison and CAIR actually want and need hate crimes against Muslims, because they’re the currency they use to buy power and influence in our victimhood-oriented society, and to deflect attention away from jihad terror and onto Muslims as putative victims. Hamas-linked CAIR, designated a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates, and other Muslims have on many occasions not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating “hate crimes,” including attacks on mosques. Most notably, in February, a New Jersey Muslim was found guilty of murder that he tried to portray as an “Islamophobic” attack, and in 2014 in California, a Muslim was found guilty of killing his wife, after first blaming her murder on “Islamophobia.”

CAIR is unsavory in numerous other ways as well. The organization was named by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. In fact, CAIR routinely advises Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

Ellison is no better. Keith Ellison has spoken at a convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Yet ISNA has actually admitted its ties to Hamas, which styles itself the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Justice Department actually classified ISNA among entities “who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood.”

It gets worse. In 2008, Ellison accepted $13,350 from the Muslim American Society (MAS) to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca. The Muslim American Society is a Muslim Brotherhood organization: “In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation’s major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members.” That’s from the Chicago Tribune in 2004, in an article that is now carried on the Muslim Brotherhood’s English-language website, Ikhwanweb.

Also, CAIR raised large amounts of for Ellison’s first campaign, and he has spoken at numerous CAIR events.

So when someone like Keith Ellison claims a sharp rise in attacks against mosques, one must consider the larger strategy: to paint a picture of Muslims as being harassed and persecuted in the U.S., and deserving of law enforcement protection, not law enforcement scrutiny. If that strategy succeeds, the jihad will be able to advance unopposed and unimpeded, with no one daring to say a negative word about the poor victims. Until, that is, it is far, far too late.

Read more…

Sweden CIVIL WAR: National Police Chief, “HELP US, HELP US!”

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

181

The desperate cry of a conquered nation.

Sweden on the Brink of CIVIL WAR, National Police Chief: “HELP US, HELP US!”

Sweden is being torn to pieces by Muslim immigrants and refugees. Law enforcement is crying out for help, and it is only a question of time before the country will need military intervention from abroad in order to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe.

(Photo: Sweden’s National police chief, Dan Eliasson

A leaked report concludes that the number of lawless areas (commonly referred to as “no-go zones”) in Sweden now totals 61. That is up from 55 in just one year’s time. This increase includes not only the total number, but also the geographical size of these areas.

Sweden’s National Police Commissioner, Dan Eliasson, spoke on national television and pleaded for assistance: “Help us, help us!,” he said, while warning that Swedish police forces no longer can uphold the law and therefore must ask all good powers in the country to support them.

A research expert regarding destabilized countries and 2011 recipient of Sweden’s Order of the Seraphim medal, Johan Patrik Engellau, has been working with organizations such as the UN and others that operate in crisis areas. He warns:

“I’m afraid it is the end for the well-organized, decent and egalitarian Sweden we have known up to now. Personally, I would not be surprised if a form of civil war occurs. In some places, the civil war has probably already begun.”

10News recently reported how the Swedish state has lost large areas to armed, religious groups best described as Islamist militias. Police chief Lars Alversjø says that, “There is lawlessness in parts of Stockholm (Sweden’s capital) now.” He also observed how, “The legal system, which is a pillar in every democratic society, is collapsing in Sweden.” Per Magnus Ranstorp, a researcher into terrorism and radicalization at the Swedish National Defense College, notes: “In the worst areas, extremists have taken over. The whole sense of justice and peace are threatened by the fact that the police is breaking down and it’s only getting worse. Sweden is in a disastrous situation.”

The Swedish Security Service (Säkerhetspolisen – abbreviated as Säpo), recently warned that the country is crawling with “thousands of Islamists sharing Islamic State’s ideology. In many places, public servants (i.e., non-Islamic authorities) require police escort or protection.

In related news: Sweden Changing: 150,000 Women Undergo FGM, Authorities Admit Large Areas UNDER ISLAMIST RULE

The word that Swedish authorities and media use for the country’s “no-go zones” is utenforskap. The word means something like “excluded area.” In these areas, Swedish law has been replaced with a mixture of the law of the jungle and the Islamic legal code, sharia. Armed Muslim gangs and Islamic radicals are simply carving out big pieces of Sweden for themselves. The only reason why it has not evolved into large-scale armed conflicts — in this formerly peaceful and safe country — probably relates to how Sweden’s feminist-liberal government is not putting up any real resistance against the Islamists.

Even if the Swedish feminist government chose to fight back tomorrow, Sweden has nothing close to the paramilitary capacity needed to reverse this situation. That 80 percent of the country’s law enforcement officers are considering quitting their jobs is a clear sign of a police force that is completely demoralized. The military in this traditionally pacifist country is cut down to almost nothing, and there is no money to fix it.

As Johan Patrik Engellau puts it: “The government does not seem to understand that it has lost control. There is a point where you can no longer stop a situation’s development. I do not know if Sweden has reached this point when it comes to [the consequences of] immigration, but I fear we are drawing close. If we right here and now take and clear and powerful action – including stopping immigration and the political promotion of multiculturalism – we might with some difficulty be able to save Sweden.”

The fact remains that Sweden’s political elite is nowhere near taking such decisive action, as it has not even started to openly speak out about these problems.

Therefore Sweden will very soon need help from abroad. Police chief Dan Eliasson’s prayer for help only included potential partners inside Sweden, but very soon the international community will have to intervene if a humanitarian catastrophe is to be avoided.

Read more…
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
Of fake news and fake investigations

NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Monday, June 26, 2017
Two recent polls indicate that Democratic Party rhetoric is backfiring on them. A Harvard poll shows that Americans believe it's time to move on from the Russian influence narrative, and a YouGov poll indicates that Americans are wary of fake news. Driving the rhetoric on both these fronts is the radical left and the Democratic Party, which has caused violence and continues unabated even after a man influenced by the rhetoric created a hit list and attempted to assassinate Republican members of Congress. The New York Post is reporting that the dossier on Donald Trump that started the FBI Russian investigation was a product of people who were financed by and supported the Clinton campaign.
 
The Harvard-Harris poll of 2,258 Americans indicated that 68% of the country believe the Russian investigation is hurting America. Some 62% believe the investigation will end without accomplishing anything with 38% expecting the investigation to end in impeaching the President. Interesting that the political weight of the poll was 35% Democrat, 30% Independent and 29% Republican-meaning that the Democrat respondents are hoping for impeachment while the rest of the country just wants the investigations to end and to move on to important matters. Meanwhile, the New York Post report shows that the Democrats, specifically the Clintons, were behind those that started the whole Russian investigation.
 
Another poll conducted by YouGov indicates that 70% of the general public agrees that news organizations are subject to partisan agendas. The public however is divided along the lines of politics as to whether people trust the reporting by news organizations-52% of Democrats believe that the news media is influenced by those who fund them, and 85% of Republicans believe the media is influenced by those who fund them. 83% of Democrats are more likely to trust traditional news sources compared with 58% of Republicans. These statistics may indicate that people in general are getting tired of the fake news narrative and that Democrats are more likely to believe it than Republicans.
 
Over the weekend, CNN-often accused as the leader in fake news and of being an ardent supporter of the Democratic Party's "Resist" agenda-fully retracted a story linking the Congressional investigation of a Russian investment fund to Trump officials. As it ends up, the story was a lie as held accountable by Breitbart News. CNN to date has refused to address how it was written and published. The Democratic Party propagandists are behind both the Russian narrative and the fake news propagated by left leaning media. Americans appear to be catching on. As Jesus said in Matthew 10:25-26, " If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household? Therefore Fear them not: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known."
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
Read more…

Muslims in Bosnia preparing for jihad, expect to destroy Bosnian Christians in 10-15 days

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )


41

Sarajevo, 06.24.2017: How can Israel ever have peace with her Muslim neighbors when experience shows that in any instance in which a non-Muslim state is bordering on a Muslim state, the likelihood of war is high — because Muslim aggression cannot be contained by agreements? Israel, Armenia, Serbia, Greece, Ethiopia all have learned the truth the hard way. Whoever believes in peace with Muslim neighbors has another thing coming for him. In the Balkans, there are these Muslim majority mini-states and provinces from the scrapheap of failed states of former Yugoslavia that are swarming the crowded neighborhood. And this is making the situation ever more volatile. The names of these regions may seem foreign to us, but they are real: Western Macedonia, Albania, Bujanovac/Preshevo-Serbia, Sandzak-Serbia, Kosovo-Serbia, five large municipalities of Montenegro, one-half of Bosnia.

What’s even more worrisome for the prospects of the survival of European peoples and values is that there is this hideous pan-Islamic blueprint, according to which the string of Muslim regions in the Balkans is to be connected one day into a single administrative entity connecting Turkey and Saudi Arabia with millions of Muslims in Germany and France. This is a serious threat because the masterminds behind it are convinced that the bankruptcy of geopolitical ideas in Washington will come in handy for the execution of this plan. Besides, these planners have experience with bribery and successful lobbying of United States politicians who end up working for foreign interests instead of their domestic constituents. In the 1990’s – Saudi Arabia and Iran were responsible for pro-Balkan Moslem attitudes in Washington and a lot of hostile press for a policy against the Serbs who were at war with their Muslim neighbors. The Serbs were (and still are) standing directly in the way of the Moslem expansion blueprint for the Balkans. These planners in Istanbul and Riyadh believe that USA/NATO will remain asleep at the wheel of policy when the new Muslim empire in the Balkans gets constructed.

One obvious way in which this plan is being brought to fruition is through planned referenda of Balkan Muslim states for association with Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Current steps in that direction involve memberships in various international Muslims-need-only-apply organizations and conferences (such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation) as preliminary steps towards larger goals. The degeneracy in Europe is seen as a long-term opportunity for the mission of islamization there. Prominent among targets beyond the Balkans is Germany, which is seen as the softest of the large targets of demographic conquest. The 21st century Germans are a people devoid of history and free from any pride of national historic achievement. Unlike Japan, Germany had no meaningful tradition survive the fascist period. Almost all young living white German descendants of actual Germans of history have no serious interest in procreation and traditional family life.

Sponsored by Revcontent
Find Out More >
57,332

However, their consumer economy demands fresh stocks of people. East Europe is no longer as eager a source of imported German manpower as it used to be. Turks, Arabs, Africans, Russian Muslims, Balkan Moslems loom large over Germany and seek to profit from her instant benefits system for guest workers, persecuted asylum seekers and various classes of refugees. The political ideology of the Left in Germany views very sympathetically these applicants because they are non-white and come from the Third World. Hence, the view is that these foreigners are owed something, and the red carpets are rolled in all directions.

In the article translated below, current tensions in Bosnia are revealed. Sefer Halilovich, a former Bosnian Muslim warlord (he was once a Communist officer in the Yugoslav Army) during the 1990’s (who was on trial in 2005 at the International Criminal Court in the Hague for a massacre of Christians in 1993) made bellicose and dismissive statements recently in which he confidently threatened a Bosnian Moslem war against the Christian Serb sector of Bosnia. He said that it will be successfully done at some point in the near future (taking no more than two weeks to accomplish), especially if a referendum for secession of the Serb part of Bosnia is voted upon. It is very interesting to note that in his statement the Muslim commander made it clear that there are plenty of fighters in Bosnia who would wage a war against their Christian neighbors. Did he mean by that – the foreign Arab jihadi terrorists from numerous Bosnian sleeper cells spread all over the place? The Serbian government in Belgrade swiftly condemned Salilovic’s unofficial declaration of war and told him in no uncertain terms that a Bosnian Moslem war of conquest on the Serbian part of Bosnia (called “Republic of Srpska”) will draw in the Serbian military to defend the Bosnian Serbs. The winds of war are never too far from the Balkans.

And yet in the case of this row, the symbolic question of the democratic right to vote is being opposed and made into a cause of Muslim war against Christians in Europe? We understand that Europe is no longer Christian and feels no solidarity with the Serbs. How can this be? How can religion, on the one hand, exercise such a strong hold over some men in the 21st century but not on others? Is time relative after all? Are we living in a reset of Medieval times, albeit with more lethal technology and only with respect to retrograde Muslims? Where is the Western world outcry about statements such as Sefer Halilovic’s threats?

Dachich Warns: War Would Come To Serbia Too: Muslims in Bosnia are preparing to attack, expect 10-15 days to destroy Bosnian Christians

“Halilovic tells what [Bosnian Muslim president] Bekir Izetbegovic thought. Therefore, his threats should be taken seriously, because it shows that there are war plans, which are based on the assessment that the Bosnian Republic of Serbs can not last more than 10-15 days and that Serbia cannot defend it. Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dachich believes that the statement of Sefer Halilovic on the destruction of the Republic of Serbs represents the biggest threat to peace and stability in the region. Dachich said that Halilovic is not only a former Muslim wartime commander, but he is an unofficial spokesman for Bakir Izetbegovic.” “It is clear that the referendum is only an excuse, and that it is the intention that the war be used to destroy the Serbian Republic. If they wanted to compromise, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia could have changed at least one notch in its intransigent decision [with which the Serbs were provoked]. But they were not about the need to compromise, but about an excuse for war intentions and war plans, which is what the Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina apparently prepare for,” reads the statement of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Serbia proper.

“Serbia undoubtedly wants peace and will do everything to preserve stability, but certainly will not allow a military attack and destruction of the Republic of Serbs in Bosnia. No one should even dream of such a scenario,” said Dachich. He added that “Serbia is strong enough to defend itself, and will not allow the destruction of the Republic of Serbs in the case of an attack.” ” We expect an immediate response of the international community and international representatives in Bosnia and Herzegovina, if they truly care about peace ,” he concluded.

Muslim Head of the Army of Bosnia: If there is a referendum, we will delete the Serb Republic

General and Chief of Staff of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sefer Halilovic, threatened the Republic of Serbs with disappearance if the referendum in the RS has been taken. He claims that this would mean “unraveling” of the Dayton Peace Accords and the entry into force of the new Constitution. “We threaten no one, but we will not allow anyone to take away any part of Bosnia and Herzegovina without calamity”, said Halilovic, who was visiting a TV station to talk about the referendum on the day the rumor of a referendum on secession was heard. Halilovic, in fact, explains that the implementation of the referendum in the RS is tantamount to “unraveling” of the Dayton Peace Agreement and the restoration (or extension) of the current Constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina into all of its territory.

“After such a referendum, the Dayton Constitution is no longer going to be in effect, so then we return to the new Constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, then with Allah’s help for us all to get the wisdom and the strength to bring this story to the end,” said Halilovic for TV1. Halilovic said that the Republic of Serbs in a potential conflict can hold militarily no more than 10-15 days. Asked whether in Bosnia and Herzegovina there are enough people willing to fight, Halilovic answered with “Yes, absolutely.” “And that is why I appeal for a solid consideration of my words, because [former Serbian president] Milosevic is dead, the old Yugoslav National Army does not exist, there are no more thousands of tanks, thousands of armored carriers [that Serbs used to have]… Serbia cannot help RS. We will not allow for a half of our state to secede,” Halilovic said. Newspaper “Independent” writes that he spoke as if it is a referendum on secession, not the Day of RS. Halilovic says that “on the day when Dayton agreement unravels everything will be different …” Otherwise, Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vuchich warned on Sunday that whoever is trying to “unravel” the Dayton Peace Agreement is making a real problem for everyone, no matter what, he said, the agreement is not perfect. “I’m afraid of everything if someone tries to wage war in our neighborhood. Serbia has obligations as a signatory to the Dayton Peace Agreement for Bosnia, but also because Serbia has her people living across the Drina river in Bosnia. Therefore, we will do our best to reduce tensions,” the Serbian prime minister said on RTS.

An Arab Jihadi brigade of the Bosnian Army on parade
An Arab Jihadi brigade of the Bosnian Army on public parade.

http://webtribune.rs/dacic-upozorava-rat-dolazi-i-u-srbiju-muslimani-u-bih-se-spremaju-za-napad-ocekuju-da-ce-za-10-15-dana-unistiti-rs/#

Read more…

Report: CNN Imposing New Rules on Russia Coverage After Another Botched Story

Higher-ups at CNN are cracking down after another botched story regarding President Trump and Russia.

The network retracted and deleted a story late last week that claimed Anthony Scaramucci, who served on Trump’s transition team, was under FBI investigation for a meeting he had with a Russian executive. That story, which was based off of one unnamed congressional source, was false.

“No one should publish any content involving Russia without coming to me and Jason,” CNNMoney executive editor Rich Barbieri said in an email obtained by BuzzFeed. “This applies to social, video, editorial, and MoneyStream. No exceptions.” The “Jason” referred to in the email is a vice president at CNN, according to BuzzFeed. (Read more from “Report: CNN Imposing New Rules on Russia Coverage After Another Botched Story” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/report-cnn-imposing-new-rules-russia-coverage-another

Read more…

Comment: “It’s a Shame More Republicans Weren’t Shot”

Five people were shot after a political attack against members of my government took place outside DC last week. A man asked if the people playing baseball were Republicans or Democrats. Then he started shooting.

When a professor at my state university recently painted Captain America holding up the severed head of my president, and then put that painting on display at the University of Alaska, we were reassured that the act itself was not an act of violence and that no one was hurt by it. He was simply channeling his grief at the outcome of the election.

When Americans were attacked and beat up for attending rallies in support of the man who is now our president, we could at least be reminded that it wasn’t armed conflict and that no one had been killed. Nothing to worry about, right?

Then a professor in the DC area declared to the world last month that Republicans in Congress, “should be lined up and shot. That’s not hyperbole…” Maybe he didn’t mean it, some said.

What do we tell ourselves now, after a man terrorized Americans at a baseball practice because he found their politics unacceptable? What do we tell ourselves after some responded to the attack, “Its’s a shame more Republicans weren’t shot”, a Democrat Party official in Nebraska declared publicly, “I’m glad he got shot. I wish he was f****ing dead.”, and the founder of a major liberal news site declared: “Republicans are getting what they want.”

Running for office is expected to have its share of challenges of course: public criticism, late nights, early mornings, time away from family, etc. But, excepting combat vets, the thought of getting shot at isn’t something most elected officials have ever had to wrestle with. Having people literally wanting you dead, and saying so publicly, isn’t something most elected officials have encountered throughout our nation’s history. In that, we have been blessed.

But something profound is happening in America today. A segment of our society has decided that it is not enough to disagree politically. Disagreements have always been with us, even profound ones. That is nothing new. What is new today is that some have abandoned resolving those disagreements without resorting to condemnation. Some in America have lost the capacity to let their personal ideas be challenged without seeing such challenges as a threat to their person, as a threat to their safety. While they are glad to publicly celebrate the defeat of their political opponents on Election Day, they need a “safe space” if one of their candidates loses. Their political opponents and those who would support them are so evil, that unprovoked violence against them is justified.

A college president in our neighboring state of Washington this week requested that state police help restore order on campus after a white professor insisted on teaching his class on a day when all white people were asked to leave campus. We have reached a very low point indeed, when the only way to avoid violence is to physically remove an entire race of people from an American college campus.

In political terms, we are witnessing what happens when Americans begin to lose trust in the ability of our political process to negotiate acceptable terms of peace between warring factions. In some countries, violence and threats of violence are how political differences are resolved. America was conceived in the idea that constitutional government, and an American’s right to free speech which it protects, provides an escape from such terrors. You see, freedom of speech doesn’t just protect the person speaking. In the end, it protects all of us, because it preserves the space necessary to communicate and resolve passionate, even offensive, disagreement.

Curtailing free speech, no matter how altruistic the motivation, deprives us of a critical tool in preventing violent political confrontation. Our nation’s founders were not ignorant of such conflict. They witnessed it in the years leading up to the American Revolution, and then over seven bloody years of armed conflict. They left us with many tools; a system of checks and balances, to slow and even pacify the rush to resolve political issues through violence and threatened violence.

Over the years, we have watched as many of those checks and balances have been frustrated, and as succeeding generations have received less and less training in a number of the tools that were at one time simply an assumed part of the American Experiment. As bizarre as it sounds, our laws no longer carry the force of law today. Our elected officials no longer feel bound by them as they once did. The growing fear that a judge or justice will step in to overturn a written law or the result of an election, for whatever reason, has hastened the erosion of confidence that everyday Americans still have in our laws, and in the political processes that determine what those laws will be.

Events like the attack last week, and the responses to it, confirm that our situation is most dire. While a civil war is not necessarily around the corner, we should recognize that we are already many steps down the path towards such a possibility. Now is not the time to simply comfort the survivors of these types of attacks. Yes, comfort survivors. Yes, recognize the heroism and bravery of those who intervene on their behalf and on behalf of others who would have become victims otherwise. But also ask yourself what actions we can take today to alter course and to recover the confidence in our political institutions that has been lost.

Loss of confidence is not simply a marketing problem. It will require more than an expensive PR campaign to restore that confidence. It will require fundamental reforms and the hard work to bring those reforms about. It will require sacrifice on the part of each of us. As President Reagan reminded the generation of his day, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United State where men were free.” In the end, when our political institutions are working properly, they serve a valuable function: They provide our communities with tools to resolve the political differences that will always be with us—but only if those institutions are working properly. As Americans, it is our job to ensure that they are.

(For more from the author of “Comment: It’s a Shame More Republicans Weren’t Shot” please click HERE)

Read more…

  Video Anti-Trump “Resistance” Aims To Make America “Ungovernable”: “This is war”

By Pamela Geller - on June 22, 2017

How the Left Destroys the Nation 150 Facebook Twitter Google+ We know this but they are saying it, they are telling us with impunity. They want a civil war or surrender. In Their Own Words: Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’ Leaders Say They Want To Make America ‘Ungovernable’ By Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, June 22, 2017: Behind the mass protests, choreographed chants and acts of violence, leaders of anti-Trump “resistance” efforts are communicating the same simple but dark message: they want to make America “ungovernable” for the president of the United States. These protesters say they will do whatever it takes to keep Trump from enacting his agenda, and many of them have shown a willingness to destroy public property, assault law enforcement officers and inflict violence upon their fellow citizens. In the days and weeks leading up to the inauguration, DisruptJ20 publicly advertised an invitation to “Join us in refusing to normalize Trump’s presidency, smashing his facade of legitimacy.” Protestors throw rocks at police during a protest near the inauguration of President Donald Trump in Washington, DC, U.S., January 20, 2017. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston Protestors throw rocks at police during a protest near the inauguration of President Donald Trump in Washington, DC, U.S., January 20, 2017. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston DisruptJ20 advocates using “direct action” tactics, which the group describes as taking “collective action to make social change without giving power over to an authority or middle person.” “We don’t ask permission or put our faith in electoral politics, instead, we use our bodies to stop the smooth operation of the system we oppose,” the group’s website states, citing Black Lives Matter’s efforts to shut down highways as an example of the kind of disruption they have in mind. The group is open about its aim to become “an ungovernable force this winter.” A website called Ungovernable 2017 helped coordinate DisruptJ20’s DC efforts with anti-Trump protests around the country. Some groups endorsed a pledge to never give Trump the “chance to govern.” “As we resist, we will create new governing institutions, new economic relationships, and new ways of being human,” the pledge reads. The pledge was endorsed by a number of left-wing figures including: the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, a black nationalist organization with chapters in eight cities across the country; activist and 2008 Green Party vice presidential nominee Rosa Clemente; and Lamis Deek, lawyer and a New York board member for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Mass demonstrations against Trump have continued around the country in the weeks since his inauguration. ver a week ago featured an activist calling for murder over a megaphone. The activist, reportedly associated with the Black Lives Matter movement, said that protesters “need to start killing people” and “start killing the White House.” Milo Yiannopoulos, an editor at pro-Trump website Breitbart, was forced to cancel a speech at UC Berkeley last week after mobs of protesters started fires, assaulted bystanders and pepper sprayed suspected Trump supporters as part of an organized effort to shut down the speech. https://twitter.com/shane_bauer/status/826980737446391808 Those protests were spear-headed by a national group calling themselves Refuse Fascism. The group is open about its apparent alliance with Princeton professor and DNC platform committee member Cornel West, who is listed as one of Refuse Fascism’s “initiators.” A spokesperson for West did not return a request for comment. Video posted to Refuse Fascism’s Facebook page last week features one of the group’s leaders whipping a throng of protesters into a frenzy with calls of revolution. “We need to make this country ungovernable,” she declares. “We need to do what the German people should have done when Hitler was elected.” Far-left activist group Occupy Oakland also took part in last week’s Berkeley riots. The group, a local spinoff from the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests, declared victory after Milo’s speech was cancelled due to their mob-like tactics. The group circulated a picture on Twitter of two of its banners from the protest reading, “Become ungovernable” and “This is war.” “We won this night. We will control the streets. We will liberate the land. We will fight fascists. We will dismantle the state,” Occupy Oakland captioned the photo. “This is war.”

Read more…

DHS Agent: “Staggering” Pedophilia Crisis Uncovered With Mass Arrests of Entertainers, Community Leaders, Professionals and Clergy

As bogus news pushing the divisive two-party paradigm about which puppet politician said something stupid this week fills the airwaves, very real news is taking place and conveniently getting glossed over. This very real news involves very real victims — who happen to be innocent children.

This week, a massive operation came to a head that was carried out across southern California which swept up 238 child predators and traffickers — including clergymen attempting to buy a 6-year-old boy.

Conducted by the Los Angeles Regional Internet Crimes against Children task force, “Operation Broken Heart III” targeted offenders wanted for the sexual exploitation of children, child prostitution, sex tourism and possessing and distributing child pornography, said Deputy Chief Matt Blake of the Los Angeles Police Department, as reported by the LA Times.

The mass arrests were not made up of reclusive pedophiles living in their mother’s basements either. In fact, much of the arrests involved high-profile figures throughout the community.

John Reynolds, acting special agent in charge for U.S. Department of Homeland Security Investigations said that among those arrested were entertainers, community leaders, white-collar professionals and clergy members.

“The incidence of child sexual exploitation has reached staggering proportions,” he said at a news conference.

These are not your typical Internet dwellers looking to prey on children online with images and pornography. These people are willing to cross the globe to purchase children for sex. What this exposes is the very real, elite, and extremely horrific market for children.

In May, Michael Quinn, 33, traveled from Australia to Los Angeles to complete a deal to buy a 6-year-old boy for sex, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles.

As the Times reports, undercover agents met Quinn on a social media networking site, where he had communicated that he wanted to “meet up with a dad who shares his young one,” according to prosecutors.

“Quinn explained to the undercover agent he was hoping to meet ‘other pervs’ in the U.S. and ultimately agreed to pay a human trafficker $250 to provide him with a young boy with whom he could engage in illicit sex,” according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles.

Since its inception in 2014, Operation Broken Heart has increased resources to law enforcement agencies and task forces which have resulted in thousands of arrests. It is one of 61 programs nationwide funded through the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Sadly, the funding for the prevention of child sex trafficking is but a drop in the bucket to the $51 billion spent annually fighting a [largely unconstitutional] drug war. . .

However, as the Free Thought Project has reported numerous times, many of these sickos hold positions of power within high levels of the government. They have an incentive to protect their operation and can do so using the many corrupt pedophiles within law enforcement as their minions.

In case after case, the Free Thought Project reports on horrifying instances of child sex rings that were allowed to go on for decades because politicians — including heads of states — policemen, clergy, and others were all in on the sick game.

In fact, as the new Netflix series, The Keepers set out to launch an investigation into a murder cold case it soon became much deeper because of the high-level pedophilia it revealed. The story exposed a concerted effort to conceal widespread rape and sexual abuse committed by Keough school chaplain and counselor Father Joseph Maskell, as well as other clergy, police, and a local gynecologist.

On multiple occasions, the Free Thought Project has reported interviews of former child sex trafficking victims who’ve all noted that they had nowhere to go as police and high-level politicians all took part in the abuse.

Hopefully, as the government’s war on drugs continues to crumble, people will wake up to the fact that rescuing a child from a rapist is far more important than catching some dude smoking a plant. Hopefully. (Read more articles from the author of “Staggering Pedophilia Crisis Uncovered,” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/dhs-agent-staggering-pedophilia-crisis-uncovered-mass-ar

Read more…

This School Board Leader Tried to Rig a Public Forum in Favor of Transgender Advocates. That’s Unconstitutional.


Stacking the deck at the casino makes for bad feelings among friends.

Things get more serious when you’re a government official stacking the deck at public forums with speakers in favor of your personal political views. That not only makes for bad public policy—it violates the First Amendment.

The Prince William County Virginia School Board convened last Wednesday to vote on a proposed rule that would undermine the principle of student privacy between the sexes. It would have laid the groundwork for opening up sex-specific locker rooms, showers, and other private facilities to members of the opposite sex.

Many parents have legitimate convictions that maleness and femaleness are essential biological, anatomical attributes, and they would like to openly defend the policy of maintaining privacy between the sexes, despite the claims of gender identity advocates.

Nonetheless, before the meeting, Ryan Sawyers, school board chairman, sent a text to the clerk telling her to frontload a list of favored speakers to comment before those who had already signed up.

This violated local school board rules, which say the public is to speak in the order that each citizen contacts the clerk.

This is particularly significant because at Prince William County Public School board meetings, only 10 to 15 people get to speak before the vote, since initial public comment is limited to 30 minutes. Everybody else has to wait until after the vote to make their views known.

But dishing out political leftovers to one’s opponents and frontloading the initial discussion with allies goes beyond violating local school board policy. It’s flatly unconstitutional.

School board meetings must protect viewpoint neutrality to satisfy First Amendment principles of free speech. If a school board chooses to open a forum for public comment, the process of determining who speaks cannot be determined by the viewpoint of the speaker.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit agrees.

In Child Evangelism Fellowship of MD, Inc. v. Montgomery County Public Schools, the majority opinion notes that “‘the state may be justified in reserving [its forum] for certain groups or for the discussion of certain topics,’ subject only to the limitation that its actions must be viewpoint-neutral and reasonable.”

And just last week, the Supreme Court reiterated in Matal v. Tam that government officials cannot “regulate speech in ways that favor some viewpoints or ideas at the expense of others.”

The traditional method of letting people speak in the order they sign up with the clerk is an orderly way to achieve these objectives. But giving the chairman the power to decide who speaks before the vote does not satisfy these criteria.

If the chairman is not bound by a limiting principle, then he has unbridled discretion to determine who can use the coveted 30 minutes of speech. It will be difficult, over time, for him not to hand-pick allies, particularly since he is a Democratic candidate for Congress.

Indeed, the first speaker on the chairman’s list, Danica Roem, is also a political player, a local Democrat recently nominated to run against incumbent Republican Bob Marshall in a Virginia House of Delegates race.

To be clear, after the chairman’s text messages were made public and Alliance Defending Freedom sent a letter to Prince William County Public Schools, the chairman did not stick to his original plan on Wednesday night.

But it remains unclear whether the final speaking order came from a new alternative list he created, or whether he reverted back to school board policy and used the original list of speakers, based on the order that local citizens signed up to speak.

That is precisely the problem. In the American system of ordered liberty, government officials don’t have the power to make that choice. They cannot dish out fast passes for the view they like while relegating opposing views to second-class status.

Rather, if officials choose to set up times for public comment, they must set up an orderly process that respects the free speech of all participants.

All voices should equally receive free speech protection, because our Constitution recognizes that when the government plays favorites, everyone’s freedom flounders. (For more from the author of “This School Board Leader Tried to Rig a Public Forum in Favor of Transgender Advocates. That’s Unconstitutional.” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/school-board-leader-tried-rig-public-forum-favor-transgender-ad

Read more…

Despicable Nebraska Democrat Says He’s ‘F**King Glad’ Scalise Got Shot

A Nebraska Democratic Party (NDP) operative has been fired from his position on the Technology Committee of the of the NDP after recorded audio appeared in which he says he was “f***ing glad” that Congressman Steve Scalise, R-La., was shot and that he wishes Scalise “was f***ing dead.”

Phil Montag, the state party’s technology committee co-chairman, was recorded saying “I’m glad he got shot” and “I wish he was f***ing dead” during a private meeting with NDP Black Caucus Chair Chelsey Gentry-Tipton that was recorded.

Rep. Scalise was shot during a targeted attack on GOP members of Congress in Alexandria, Va., in mid-June by radical leftist James T. Hodgkinson, who wanted to kill Republicans. Gentry-Tipton has come under fire herself after she made comments on Facebook that she thought it was “funny” that Republicans were “crying” after Scalise and four others were injured.

Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=58&v=cGlcRQsnYdg

Here is a transcript of the discussion, provided by Leavenworth St., a conservative blog in Nebraska:

Male: “Right now, so what is it that you want to do?”
Phil Montag: “Let me tell you, that motherf***er, the one that was shot, the scafie guy…I mean that guy, what’s was his name scafie?”
Female: “Scalise”
Male: “I really don’t want you to deflect right now.”
Montag: “No, this motherf***er, like his whole job is to like get people , convince Republicans to f***in’ kick people off f***in’ healthcare”
Female: “We know all of this.”
Montag: “I hate this motherf***er”
Female: “We know this”
Montage: “I’m f***in’ glad he got shot!”
Male: “Phil! Phil!”
Montag: “I’m glad he got shot!”
Male: “Dude!”
Montage: “I’m not going to f***in’ say that in public.”
Female: “You don’t have to say that in public.”
Male: “Then what are you saying it to us for?”
Female: “Say something, say something.”
Male: “What are you telling us for?”
Montag: “I wish he was ***in’ dead!”
Male: “Why are you telling us but not telling anyone else?”
Montag: “Cause I’m trying to f***in’ figure all this s*** out.”
Male: “It’s OK, because I’ve been recoding this conversation since you’ve come in, so I will publicly release it myself.”

In the wake of the released audio, NDP Chairwoman Jane Kleeb removed Montag from his position with the state party.

“I apologize to all the Democrats who now have to answer at the sale barn or hair salon what is wrong with the direction of politics,” Kleeb told the Lincoln Journal Star.

“The hateful rhetoric has no place in the Democratic Party and does not represent the values of Democrats across our state and country who lift up working-class families every day.”

Reached for comment by Conservative Review, Kleeb said “The amount of heated political rhetoric is dangerous and reckless.”

Montag denied wishing that Scalise was dead, arguing to the Omaha World-Herald Thursday that his words had been taken out of context.

“Like every decent American I am saddened and horrified by the shooting of Congressman Scalise,” Montag told the paper by email. “I do not and did not wish for his death. I am hopeful that the entirety of the original, unedited recording will emerge so we can get to the truth of the matter.”

Mr. Montag did not respond to a request for comment from Conservative Review. (For more from the author of “Despicable Nebraska Democrat Says He’s ‘F**King Glad’ Scalise Got Shot” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/despicable-nebraska-democrat-says-hes-fking-glad-scalis

Read more…
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY student snowflakes object to the term “radical Islamic terrorism” because it might hurt the feelings of radical Islamic terrorists
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
The recent terror attacks in London have re-energized the debate over the term “radical Islam,” but not among student interviewed, nearly all of whom insisted that it is “wrong” to employ the phrase.
Campus Reform Curious to know where college students would come down on the matter, Campus Reform headed to Washington, D.C. to ask students at George Washington University a simple question: “Should we use the phrase ‘Radical Islam,’ or is it too offensive?” Quickly, it became clear that students found the phrase abrasive and unnecessary.
 
Another student objected that “the term ‘radical’ isn’t often assigned to any other religion; it’s only used with Islam,” but when pressed to name any terrorist attacks committed in the name of other religions, the student conceded that “I can’t name any off the top of my head, actually.”
Read more…

Milwaukee: Muslim threatens courthouse – “I’m gonna kill you all. Allah. Bomb.”

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

Mohamad Hamdan

Source: “I’m gonna kill you all. Allah. Bomb.” Man charged, accused of making threats at U.S. Courthouse | h/t TROP

MILWAUKEE — Charges have been filed against a man accused of making threats at the U.S. Courthouse near Jefferson and Wisconsin on Thursday, June 15th. The incident led to a traffic mess in downtown Milwaukee as several streets near the courthouse were shut down, and the courthouse itself, along with other businesses in the area, were evacuated.

The accused is 32-year-old Mohamad Hamdan of Milwaukee. He faces one felony count of “terrorist threats” and two misdemeanor counts of bail jumping.

According to a criminal complaint, on June 15th, officials were dispatched to the U.S. Courthouse after a report of “a subject fighting a U.S. Marshal.” A security officer at the courthouse told investigators shortly before 11:00 a.m., a suspect, later identified as Hamdan, parked his vehicle in front of the courthouse and walked into the building. Once inside “he began yelling loudly in an Arabic language,” saying things like “Mohammed,” “Allah,” “jihad” and “Malakum.” He asked “Where are the Marshals?” When asked where he needed to be, he said “I am a Marshal.” When asked for identification, he began yelling “Ji-ha” and “Malakum.”

When he suddenly placed his right hand into his pocket, he “caused security to fear for their immediate safety,” the complaint says. He was approached by a courthouse security officer who demanded he back up, and exit the building, and U.S. Marshals were contacted for assistance.

When a U.S. Marshal asked the suspect whether he had any business at the courthouse, he responded by calling the Marshal the “N-word,” the complaint says. The U.S. Marshal tried to escort the man out, but he moved closer to the inside of the building. The Marshal eventually got him out of the building — to the front steps of the courthouse. There, he “began pacing back and forth,” yelling “in an Arabic language and also in English.” He told the Marshals “(expletive) you guys,” and called them the “N-word.” The complaint says the suspect appeared to be talking on a cell phone — which was later recovered, and it was determined that it hadn’t been powered on.

The complaint says Hamdan was told to leave multiple times — told he would be arrested if he refused. He eventually went to his van, and with the driver’s side window down, he “continued to yell in another language with English words interspersed” — specifically yelling “(expletive) you. I’m gonna kill you all. Allah. Bomb.” When he said “bomb,” a decision was made to identify him. When asked for identification, the complaint says Hamdan said “no” and started his van.

When asked to stop, the complaint says Hamdan looked at officials and tried pulling away. A Marshal was able to pull him from the vehicle, and the complaint says he “resisted, began to fight and refused to be handcuffed.” He was directed to the ground on Wisconsin Avenue where he was handcuffed.

Traffic was blocked on Wisconsin Avenue, in both directions in front of the courthouse and for one block on Jefferson Street to enable a bomb-sniffing dog and “Hazardous Device Unit” to check the suspect’s van for explosives.

Additionally, the courthouse was partially evacuated during this incident, along with several businesses in the area. The complaint notes that “citizens attempting to utilize this area were vastly inconvenienced because they did not have access for over two hours before the streets were reopened.”

According to the complaint, Hamdan in 2016 and 2017 was charged with misdemeanor battery (domestic abuse), disorderly conduct (domestic abuse) and bail jumping (domestic abuse) — a condition of his bond that he commit no further crimes.

Please Share & Help Wake America Up

Read more…

Audio: Robert Spencer debates James White on violence in Islam

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

Yesterday on Dr. Michael Brown’s Line of Fire radio show, I debated Dr. James White, a Christian evangelist, on the question, “Is True Islam Always Violent Islam?”

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBCWsabA5Y4

Of course, Islam has no central authority that can declare what is “true Islam” and what isn’t, but one can certainly speak about what is authoritative, mainstream Islam, and I did.

Read more…

Quebec Premier: “You cannot disconnect…terrorism from Islam in general”

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

“Haroun Bouazzi, co-president of the Association of Muslims and Arabs for a Secular Quebec, said..expecting the community to detect a lone wolf who buys a knife and travels to Michigan is asking a lot…’This person had an understanding of his faith that allowed him to kill people.’…Bouazzi said that instead of dwelling on the responsibility of Muslim leaders to prevent extremism, Couillard’s government should be tackling the exclusion of young Muslims that can lead to radicalization. ‘If somebody has to take responsibility for prevention, it’s the government,’ he said.”

Bouazzi does not explain how Ftouhi got “an understanding of his faith that allowed him to kill people.” Was it in a mosque in Quebec? Nor did he explain why the government has the responsibility to do something about this, but the Muslim community doesn’t. How can the Quebec government, a non-Muslim entity, change Muslims’ understanding of their faith?

Note that his declaration that “Couillard’s government should be tackling the exclusion of young Muslims that can lead to radicalization” is based on the assumption that has been discredited in numerous studies, that poverty and lack of opportunity leads to terrorism. It is essentially a veiled attempt at extortion, an attempt to compel the Quebec government to shower millions of dollars on the Muslim community, in the vain hope that it will eradicated jihad terrorism by doing so.

Couillard is to be commended for speaking an obvious truth that few dare to enunciate. Let’s hope he stands his ground.

“After Michigan attack, Quebec Premier calls on Muslim community to play role in preventing terrorism,” by Graeme Hamilton, National Post, June 22, 2017 (thanks to Michael):

MONTREAL – When Islamist terrorists strike in the West, it has become standard for political leaders to stress that the actions of a few should not tarnish an entire community. On Thursday, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard chose a different approach.

Responding to the arrest of Amor Ftouhi of Montreal after a terror assault in Michigan, Couillard said the province’s Muslim community needs to do more to prevent terrorism.

“Unfortunately, you cannot disconnect this type of event – terrorism – from Islam in general,” Couillard said in Quebec City when asked if he was worried the attack would fuel anti-Muslim sentiment. He said he shares the position French President Emmanuel Macron expressed this week in a speech to Muslim community leaders.

“He told them, it’s also your responsibility to act on the theological front, to explain to your people that this (terrorism) is not part of the religion, that it is contrary to the teachings of the religion. There is a dual responsibility,” Couillard said….

Couillard said his government is “completely against” intolerance and discrimination, but there are fears among Quebec Muslims that the latest attack and the premier’s reaction will feed a backlash.

“With remarks like this, saying Islam cannot be disconnected from terrorism, Mr. Couillard is pouring oil on the fire,” said Eve Torres, co-ordinator of a group that works to integrate Muslim women into Quebec society. “He is premier, and not only is he saying Islam and terrorism are inseparable, he says the responsibility for terrorism falls also on the Muslim community. It endangers communities that are already stigmatized.”

Haroun Bouazzi, co-president of the Association of Muslims and Arabs for a Secular Quebec, said community members have for years been working to combat radicalization. When young Quebecers seeking to join the jihad are arrested, it is usually an imam or family member who has tipped off police, he said.

But expecting the community to detect a lone wolf who buys a knife and travels to Michigan is asking a lot, he said.

“This person had an understanding of his faith that allowed him to kill people. That is obviously the reality, and we cannot bring back the words of ‘Allahu akbar’ inside his mouth. He actually yelled that,” Bouazzi said.

“But to link this fact and the responsibility of Muslim communities to play a special role more than any normal citizen is actually stigmatizing.”

Couillard was inspired by a speech Macron gave before the French Council of the Muslim Faith Tuesday night at a meal to break the Ramadan fast.

“It is up to you, religious leaders, to fight toe to toe on theological and religious terrain, to expose the usurping of your values, the appropriation of your religion’s history, the negation of 15 centuries of interpretation work done by your scholars,” Macron said. He added, “The battle of thought and faith must be fought on the ground, especially among the younger generations.”

Last week, Statistics Canada published data showing a sharp increase in hate crimes against Muslims in Quebec — even before taking into account the January attack on a Quebec City mosque that killed six. Bouazzi and Torres were among a group of Muslim activists who called on the government to deliver promised programs to combat racism.

Bouazzi said that instead of dwelling on the responsibility of Muslim leaders to prevent extremism, Couillard’s government should be tackling the exclusion of young Muslims that can lead to radicalization. “If somebody has to take responsibility for prevention, it’s the government,” he said.

Read more…

Indiana: Muslim threatens Goodwill store customers to convert to Islam, attacks police

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

It is the context of Khalid Sulaiman Bilal’s behaviour that makes this report so flabbergasting, but he is doing what he sees as his personal duty of “good will”; what he did is also what countless numbers of his coreligionists are doing around the world, as they follow the dictates of Islamic texts.

According to Quran 2:193:

Fight them until there is no fitnah and worship is for Allah.

In the Hadith (Sahih Muslim 33):

The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”

The good news is that Bilal was deported back to Saudi Arabia before he could inflict greater harm. The bad news is that there are many others like him among us in the West who — in their view — are obligated to subjugate infidels using violence and other methods of conquest.

“Saudi Student Deported After Allegedly Threatening Goodwill Store Shoppers to Convert to Islam”, by Warner Todd Huston, Breitbart, June 22, 2017:

A Saudi Arabian national and former student at Ball State University has been deported after being arrested in March for the alleged violent threatening of shoppers at an Indiana Goodwill store unless they converted to Islam.

Khalid Sulaiman Bilal, 24, was arrested on March 25, accused of threatening people in a Muncie, Indiana, Goodwill store. Police said Bilal was “forcibly” trying to convert shoppers to Islam, Fox 59 reported.

Bilal, charged with 15 crimes, reportedly threatened shoppers, resisted arrest, attacked police, and choked a store clerk, the Muncie Star Press reported.

In March, Fox 59 described the incident vividly:

Bilal allegedly entered the store and began forcefully trying to convert people to Islam while claiming to be the Prophet Muhammad and trying to place his hands on them. He struck and strangled an employee and told her he would kill her if she didn’t convert to Islam. He attacked responding officers, breaking one of the officer’s hands and repeatedly kicking the other. During the scuffle, Bilal yelled “Allahu Akbar,” a phrase meaning “God is greater” and commonly used by Islamic radicals before a violent attack, according to an affidavit filed by Homeland Security.

After a Department of Homeland Security investigation, Bilal was deported….

Read more…

This American Town is Now FULLY Under Sharia Law – EVERYONE Needs to See This

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

As we witness the demise of many European nations under waves of Muslim immigration, it would be a

The following video shows that, thanks to the policies of Barack Obama, at least one American town is already completely under Sharia Law.

And it won’t be the last if we don’t start supporting President Trump’s immigration policies.

It’s not about ending immigration. It’s about making sure those we do let in are prepared to integrate with American society and culture, NOT TRY TO OVERTHROW IT.

Watch and weep:

Video http://riseagainamerica.com/2017/04/07/american-town-now-fully-sharia-law-everyone-needs-see/

Read more…

“I’m a Muslim, it’s my duty to destroy Christian symbols,” says African Muslim invader who attacked a church in Italy

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

The 25-year-old Gambian Muslim who, in January, damaged a shrine containing the statue of the Madonna in the outside courtyeard of the Parish of the Madonna of the Rosary and set fire to a crib has been deported from Italy. He justified his act by reference to his Muslim faith.

%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-01-02-PHOTO-00003312-e1498063216129.jpg?resize=700%2C525" alt="" width="590" height="443" />

Immediato  When he was caught trying to flee the scene, he said it was his duty as a Muslim to destroy Christian symbols. Since the incident took place in January and he has now been expelled, this means he has served almost no prison time for the offenses of setting fires, property damage and violently resisting arrest. No doubt, he’ll be back again on one of the illegal alien Muslim smuggler boats getting rescued by the Italian Coast Guard on a daily basis these days.

%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/incendio-presepe-3.jpg?resize=640%2C427" alt="" width="590" height="394" />

Share this news

Read more…

Kansas: Mayor, FBI attend opening of mega-mosque in Overland Park

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

After

Several years ago, all that sat on this vast acreage of farmland was a small home. Then Muslims purchased the home and converted it into a mosque.

Before

Now, across the street from a public library and an elementary school sits an enormous mega mosque.

Excerpted from Islamo-pandering puff piece on Islam and Muslims. Source: Cross Section Of Community Celebrates New Mosque In Overland Park | KCUR

Crowds streamed into the new classic masjid, Arabic for mosque, at the Islamic Center of Johnson County.

Overland Park Mayor Carl Gerlach did the official honor of cutting a ceremonial ribbon for the construction project, which was conceived a decade ago.

“It’s important to Overland Park because these are great friends,” Gerlach says. “They’ve worked well with the city, are great community builders, and it makes us a stronger community building this mosque here.”

Overland Park mayor shaking hands with imam (who posted videos of Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf Qaradawi)

Zafir Hawa, a local cardiologist and trustee of the Islamic Center, estimates Johnson County is home to about 5,000 Muslims.

Mary Baker of Olathe Bible Church says her church has had a long relationship with ICJC.

“I pray for God’s protection over this mosque,” Baker says. “I think it’s extremely important in this day and age to build bridges between communities, so we can learn how we share values in spite of differences between the two faiths.”

Several members of the FBI were present at Friday’s ceremony.

Officials with the mosque consulted with the FBI before construction of the new building about security measures. Both the exterior and interior perimeters are equipped with special lights and panoramic surveillance cameras.

Special Agent in Charge Darrin Jones says the FBI is engaging with many different communities.


What he meant to say was, “many different Muslim communities.”

Creeping Sharia exposed this mosque’s oath of allegiance to the Koran. Since we reported on it the mosque promptly wiped the statement from their website. We screen capped before they erased it. Mega mosque coming to Overland Park, Kansas

icjc-kansas

The Qur’an in its scope is the full and final divinely revealed constitution for mankind. It is also the textbook of the Muslim Iman (Faith) and the source book of Islamic laws, rules and regulations for the Muslims.

The Islamic Center of Johnson County, Inc., unequivocally affirms the Qur’an and the Sunnah as its eternal and ultimate constitution.


And despite there being no threat whatsoever, and because the Muslims have an Islamic adviser to the chief of police, Taxpayers pay for extra police patrols at Kansas mosque.

Per their own website, the mosque is open but they are using the neighboring library for parking. Did they run out of parking spaces already? Not plan enough? Were they permitted to open the mosque prior to completing construction of the parking lot?  With the mayor, local police and FBI in pocket, and a newly selected Muslim city councilman, who will even question them?

Creeping Sharia, FBI, Immigration, Kansas, Legal, Media, Mosque, News, Politics, Religion, Sharia, Stealth Jihad, Zoning Jihad

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “Kansas: Mayor, FBI attend opening of mega-mosque in Overland Park

  1. sad sad sad. published to my public FB with my added comments:

    WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

    Of course the FBI will find nothing on “opening day:” although their avg IQ is only 75 (means half have IQ LESS than 75), they can hide bad stuff and lie to the FBI and governor. The brain dead liberal idiots we have in public office let these non assimilating taqiyya lying warriors in with welcome arms! HOW DARE THEY DESTROY MY COUNTRY LIKE THIS???? Which citizens of Overland Park will be the first beheaded? Which poor children will be raped and brutalized first? KEEP IT UP DUMB ASS LIBERALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. moe ham head

    dorothy we are not in kansas anymore

    • wellborn

      Looks like the wicked witch of the West really DOES EXIST–not to mention all the demons and devils from the PIT OF HELL that are coming out of the woodwork!!!!! I’m sooo sure the “good” citizens of Overland Park (like Mary Baker from the Bible Church) can’t wait to hear that screeching howling wailing racket blaring from the minarets FIVE TIMES A DAY!!!!! Hey Mary, did you stick your ass-end of in the air for the allah-god yet–YOU’RE PATHETIC, Mary!!!!! YOU’RE ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC!!!!!

  3. I the US the Arabs do not need to behead anyone they cut the throats of anyone who speaks against them not with a knife but with our very legal system. Yes they use the law to silence anyone. they are given aid by the liberals who think that in so doing they are in control; it will be a sad day when they wake up and find they ones holding the power ae those who have bought them heart and soul.

  4. Gail P

    As Christians are being killed and marginalized across the world (yes, in our America), the Islamic Caliphate is making inroads at an amazing pace, especially in this country. All you politically correct mush-head liberals, can’t you see what’s happening to your country? Or perhaps you prefer Sharia Law to our constitutional law and think that wearing hijabs and burkas is really cool, as well as female genital mutilation and wife beating, all in the name of the magnificent and beneficent Allah who tells you if you kill infidels you will go to heaven and have 72 virgins at your beck and call? Keep ignoring the obvious, and that’s just what America will be turned into, sooner rather than later.

Read more…